🇨🇦🍁 Canada First 🍁🇨🇦

► Go to http://turleybuysgold.com or text TURLEY to 35052 to get instant access to this free report and learn how to take full control of your financial future. *The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* ————————————————————————— ► Register for the FREE Live Training Here! https://bkprofit.com/turley *The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* ————————————————————————— ► America First Crypto Wealth: BlockTrustIRA’s patriotic AI platform brings Trump-era prosperity to hardworking Americans through sophisticated crypto investing previously hoarded by coastal elites. Get up to $2,500 in bonus crypto at https://turleytalkscrypto.com/ *The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* ————————————————————————— ► Join my new Courageous Patriots Club and get equipped to fight back and restore foundational values. Learn more at http://fight.turleytalks.com/join ——————————————————————— The use of any copyrighted material in this video is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Buy BaggyPants A Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/BaggyPants

On January 22nd 2026, Frances Widdowson, Jim McMurtry and Dallas Brodie rolled up to the Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre at 11 a.m to spark an open conversation about the so-called unmarked graves “discoveries” from 2021. Hundreds of counter-protesters including Antifa activists, Marxists and others who label any skepticism as "denialism" or worse, swarmed the scene. In this video Dan Dicks or Press For Truth gives a chronological breakdown of everything that happened yesterday at UBC proving the point that if the facts were on the side of the protesters they wold debate, instead of act like thugs. Help SAVE PRESS FOR TRUTH ➜ https://www.givesendgo.com/SavePressForTruth To get your money out of the dollar and into gold and silver visit: https://pressfortruth.ca/gold For all your detoxing, health and supplement needs visit: https://pressfortruth.thegoodinside.com Get 10% off your tickets to Anarchapulco 2026 with Promo Code PFT https://anarchapulco.com/?ref=5472 If you would like to support this kind of journalism please consider making a contribution here: Buy Me A Coffee ➜ https://buymeacoffee.com/pressfortruth Help SAVE PRESS FOR TRUTH ➜ https://www.givesendgo.com/SavePressForTruth Other Ways To DONATE ➜ https://pressfortruth.ca/donate/ SUBSCRIBESTAR ➜ https://www.subscribestar.com/pressfortruth PATREON ➜ https://www.patreon.com/PressForTruth DONATE via Paypal ➜ https://www.paypal.me/PressforTruth Or you can send an e-transfer to [email protected] If you’re old fashioned like we are and prefer to keep it old school, we also accept cash, cheques (made out to Dan Dicks), equipment and words of encouragement! You can send us those things here: Dan Dicks P.O. Box 1521 Squamish BC V8B 0B1 SUBSCRIBE: BITCHUTE ➜ https://www.bitchute.com/pressfortruth/ ODYSEE ➜ https://lbry.tv/@PressForTruth BAYSTON➜ https://bastyon.com/dandickspft MINDS ➜ https://www.minds.com/pressfortruth RUMBLE➜ https://rumble.com/user/PressForTruth HIVE ➜ https://hive.blog/@pressfortruth/posts BANNED ➜ https://banned.video/channel/press-for-truth YouTube ➜ https://www.youtube.com/@weavingspider Second Backup YouTube Channel ➜ https://www.youtube.com/@pressfortruthdandickspft

Thank you chair. I was incredibly accurate and and I can read directly from the statement here and I member member to site from this because what seizure had said and again all of us I believe should've been engaging with a number of stakeholders on this, but what he just said in its statement was that this needs to be the product of cross party consensus they want targeted amendments. It is difficult to offer targeted amendments and work across party lines when we are given a 40 or two business day window to do this and again is it more important to get it right or is it more important just to get this through to the liberal government can do what it loves to do which is claim a win without actually doing the work and in some cases going beyond to make problems worse, and I am aware that we are sitting on the house of common standing committee on justice and human rights here and I think that's tremendously relevant because it is this portfolio the justice portfolio that should've been engaged when the liberal government previously invoked the emergencies act and why that's relevant to the motion we are debating right now it means the emergencies act was government taking a statute that was designed for a very good reason and somewhat arguing necessary reason to deal with eventually, the eventualities in an emergencies that it might require extraordinary action and they use this to deal with a protest the Trudeau government the liberal government use the emergencies act to deal with a protest of people that were saying unkind things about the liberal government and in doing so they violated the lot and I don't mean they violated some bylaw. I don't mean that the government to you know violated some minor statute. They actually violated the most supreme law in the country, which is the constitution of Canada, and this is not my opinion. This is a decision by the federal court, the federal court which said not only did the liberal government break the law in invoking the emergencies act, but they broke the law in the measures that they chose to use the emergencies act for namely restricting mobility and freezing the bank account of political dissonance so how can we trust the government and by the way the liberals are fighting that in court they are appealing that decision in court so how can we trust a government that's so brazenly violates the charter rights of Canadians to redefine hate, and in doing so lower the threshold of what people can say on the Internet to lower the threshold of what people can say online and after the minister of justice testified before our committee admitted, but they'll see nine will in fact affect online speech will affect social media post. I saw on social media. There are a lot of people looking at from the United Kingdom. Examples of police literally knocking on peoples doors because of their tweets because they posted something on social media and and these are not even people who are charged necessarily somewhere, which was quite shameful but some of them were logged as "non-crime hate incidents a term that has emerged in the United Kingdom to deal with these cases where no one's even arguing there's a law broken, but they want to send a message to the state the authorities want to send a message that you don't get to say things as a pre-citizen unless we tell you to, and it's interesting and I mean that liberals want to claim to be a united front I know that Steven Gilbert has quit the liberal cabinet today. This is news that has has just come out which is quite interesting and this is again another example where the liberals have decided to ignore the constitution of this country on energy policy, so if they're ignoring the constitution on energy policy in which the federal government has the latitude to approve pipelines, how on earth can we expect them to follow the constitution when it comes to freedom of expression. I suspect we might see Mr. Gilboe in an orange jumpsuit, scaling the peace tower any day now, so if members want to take a suspension to go and watch that they may, but the reason that we are talking about the trustworthiness of the government here is because their desire to ram through Bill C9 is itself a symptom of the issues that we've been raising and witnesses have been raising.

🇨🇦 The System Canadians Paid For — And Can’t Access How Canadians Became Last in a System They Built SECTION 1 — THE PROMISE CANADIANS LIVED BY Canadians were raised to believe in a simple deal. You work. You pay taxes. You contribute quietly for decades. And when you need help — healthcare, EI, retirement — the system is there, but unreachable for many who paid into it. Many Canadians paid taxes from their very first jobs. Their parents paid enough years to retire — or tried to. Some only got a few years of retirement before they died. Others retired, realized they couldn’t afford it, and were forced back to work — sick, exhausted, and afraid. That matters — because it proves Canadians already sacrificed. SECTION 2 — WHAT CANADIANS GET IN RETURN Today, Canadians face a system that barely functions. No family doctors. Emergency rooms measured in hours, not care. Seniors working into their 70s after strokes. Injured workers forced to push through pain and exhaustion because help is denied. This isn’t because Canadians didn’t pay. It’s because the system they funded no longer prioritizes them. SECTION 3 — THE HOOPS CANADIANS ARE MADE TO JUMP THROUGH When Canadians ask for help, they are made to jump through hoops. Employment Insurance — a program Canadians pay into — takes months. Call centres. Paperwork. Confusion. People who are injured, stressed, or sick are expected to navigate a system that barely listens. Many eligible Canadians give up — not because they don’t qualify, but because the process itself is exhausting and inaccessible. Assistance programs judge people on technicalities, not reality. Zero income doesn’t matter. If someone else in the household earns a small amount — even if it doesn’t cover the bills — help is denied. The message becomes simple: Work injured, or don’t eat. SECTION 4 — THIS IS NOT ABOUT IDENTITY Canadians are not angry about helping people. Canadians are angry about sequence. Because at the same time Canadians are pushed through endless hoops, the system front-loads support elsewhere — before contribution. This is not about race. It is not about where someone comes from. It is about who paid first — and who is now last. SECTION 5 — THE RECEIPTS ARE NOT OPINIONS OR RUMOURS The receipts are not opinions. They are not rumours. And they are not hidden. The data exists in Canada Revenue Agency records, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada reports, Parliamentary Budget Officer analyses, Auditor General findings, and federal and provincial budget documents. Anyone can look it up. This explainer is not putting spreadsheets or screenshots on screen. It is explaining what official government data already shows. When this is posted, links to CRA, IRCC, the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the Auditor General, and budget documents will be included in the description so people can verify it themselves. What follows is not speculation — it is a summary of documented policy outcomes. Billions of dollars every year in Canada Child Benefit payments paid based on residency and income — not citizenship. No minimum years of tax contribution required. Over $7 billion paid to non-citizen residents since 2016. Healthcare coverage is provided immediately to certain new arrivals, including prescriptions, prenatal care, and hospital services — before provincial coverage even begins. When housing is unavailable, governments pay for hotels — often hundreds of dollars per night per family — for weeks or months at a time. Income supports, child benefits, food, furniture, clothing, settlement services, caseworkers and interpreters — all funded by Canadian tax dollars. Public schooling, ESL supports, transportation, special services — immediately — at an average cost of over $13,000 per child per year. These are not anecdotes. These are documented outcomes of policy decisions, and the sources will be linked in the description of this video. SECTION 6 — FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND RETIREMENT WITHOUT CONTRIBUTION Another issue Canadians are increasingly aware of — but rarely see discussed honestly — is how immigration and family reunification policies interact with retirement and senior benefits. Newcomers are able to sponsor parents and grandparents who may already be at or near retirement age and who have not worked or paid taxes in Canada for decades, or at all. Over time, these family members become eligible for senior supports based on residency, not long-term contribution. Programs like Old Age Security and income-tested supplements are funded entirely by Canadian taxpayers — including workers who paid into the system their entire lives and are now struggling to afford retirement themselves. This creates a growing imbalance. Canadians who worked here for 40 or 50 years are delaying retirement, returning to work, or going without — while others qualify for age-based benefits without having contributed a comparable share. This is not about resentment toward families. It is about policy sequencing and sustainability. When contribution is not aligned with eligibility — and when residency alone unlocks long-term supports — the burden shifts onto the same taxpayers who are already being told there is “no money” for healthcare, housing, or pensions. Asking whether this system is fair, sustainable, and properly balanced is not hostility. It is responsible governance. SECTION 7 — WHO FALLS THROUGH THE CRACKS (HOUSING & HOMELESSNESS) Another reality Canadians are noticing — quietly, carefully, and repeatedly — is who ends up homeless, and who does not. Across Canadian cities, encampments are filled overwhelmingly with people who were born here. People who worked here. People who paid taxes here. People who lost jobs, got sick, aged out of affordability, or were denied help when they needed it most. What Canadians are not seeing — in any significant numbers — are newly arrived families living on the streets. This is not an accusation. It is an observation about access and routing. New arrivals are directed immediately into housing systems: temporary accommodations, shelters, hotels, placement programs, and settlement housing — all publicly funded. Canadians, by contrast, are often told: “There’s nothing available.” “Try again later.” “Go to a shelter — if there’s space.” The result is a visible disparity. The harshest failure point of the system — homelessness — is absorbed almost entirely by people who already paid into it. This is not compassion failing. It is prioritization failing. SECTION 8 — GIVING MONEY AWAY WHILE CANADIANS STRUGGLE Canadians are also watching something else happen at the same time. While people here struggle to access healthcare, housing, income support, and basic stability, the federal government continues to send billions of dollars abroad. Foreign aid, international development funding, climate financing, military support, and global initiatives are funded by the same source as everything else: Canadian taxpayers. Canadians are told there is “no money” at home — yet money continues to flow outward. They are not asked whether this is affordable. They are told it is necessary. A government that says it cannot support its own citizens while committing billions internationally is not suffering from a lack of funds. It is making policy choices. Canadians are forced to contribute to those choices even as the system they pay into fails to meet their most basic needs. SECTION 9 — NON-ESSENTIAL AND SYMBOLIC SPENDING DURING A DOMESTIC CRISIS Canadians are also questioning how money is being spent inside Canada while core needs go unmet. They see funding directed toward symbolic initiatives, rebranding, consultants, apps, and programs that do not improve healthcare access, reduce housing costs, or help seniors live with dignity. They see billions allocated to gun buyback programs, despite no clear evidence of improved safety, while policing, courts, and border enforcement remain underfunded. They see governments invest in apps and digital platforms that fail or are abandoned, while essential systems like EI and healthcare access remain broken. Provinces like New Brunswick have publicly stated they cannot afford to participate in some of these initiatives — reinforcing that affordability is a real constraint, not a manufactured one. Canadians are not asking for perfection. They are asking why non-essential spending continues while essential services collapse. SECTION 10 — MEDICAL NEEDS CAPPED WHILE SYMBOLIC SPENDING EXPANDS Another reality Canadians see — especially families caring for seniors — is how basic medical needs are rationed. Many seniors rely on incontinence products, bladder supports, and medical hygiene supplies. These are not optional. They are not lifestyle items. They are medical necessities tied to age, illness, and dignity. Yet seniors are often capped on how many supplies they are allowed — even when their condition requires more, even when doctors recommend more. Families are told: “That’s the limit.” “Make it last.” “Pay out of pocket.” At the same time, Canadians watch money spent on symbolic placements of the same products, while seniors — who paid into the system for decades — are told they have reached their quota. This is not about inclusion versus exclusion. It is about medical necessity versus symbolic spending. If products exist, they should go first to the people who actually need them: seniors, patients, women, and caregivers struggling to afford basics. When dignity care is capped for seniors but expanded elsewhere for optics, that is not compassion. It is misallocation. SECTION 11 — MAiD AND END-OF-LIFE CARE: COST, ACCESS, AND FEAR There are published analyses and policy discussions that examine the costs associated with end-of-life care. At the same time, access to that care is collapsing. Palliative care is limited or unavailable in many regions. Home care is capped or delayed. Disability supports are inconsistent. Families are left to navigate pain, illness, and decline largely on their own. Against that backdrop, Medical Assistance in Dying has expanded rapidly. When one option becomes easier to access than care itself, people are right to feel uneasy. The concern is not about individual choice. It is about system design. A system that cannot reliably provide care, comfort, and dignity at the end of life — but can efficiently provide death — creates fear, especially among seniors, disabled Canadians, and the chronically ill. The issue is not one program. It is a system that expands the least expensive option while failing to expand care. That is why Canadians are asking hard questions. SECTION 12 — FORCED ADAPTATION BY DESIGN Canadians are not adapting by choice. They are adapting because the system forces them to. When Employment Insurance denies people who paid in. When claims drag on for months. When injured workers are told they don’t qualify on technicalities. When the process is so complex that people give up. Families are pushed off the support they earned and redirected to lesser assistance instead. Many who have been denied should never have been denied in the first place — yet they are treated as a burden for asking for support that was specifically meant to help Canadian taxpayers. This isn’t abuse of the system. It is the consequence of a system designed to deny first, delay second, and exhaust people until they walk away. That is not compassion failing. That is design working as intended. SECTION 13 — IN CLOSING This is not about race. It is not about where someone comes from. It is about fairness. It is about sequencing. It is about sustainability. Canadians paid first. Canadians built the system. Canadians should not be last. Sources & Verification All claims are supported by publicly available data from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO), the Auditor General of Canada, federal budgets, and other official sources. Full links are listed below for reference and verification. 🔗 SOURCES & LINKS (BY SECTION) ⸻ SECTION 1–3 (Context: Work, EI, hoops, denial of access) Employment Insurance (EI) • Government of Canada – EI Overview https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei.html • EI Eligibility & Insurable Hours https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/ei-regular-benefit/eligibility.html • Auditor General reports on EI delays & access https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_202203_e_44161.html ⸻ SECTION 5 — The Receipts Are Not Opinions or Rumours Canada Child Benefit (CCB) • CRA – Who can apply for the Canada Child Benefit https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/child-family-benefits/canada-child-benefit/who-apply.html • CRA – Canada Child Benefit program overview https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/child-family-benefits/canada-child-benefit.html • CRA – CCB statistics & total payments https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/child-family-benefits/benefits-statistics.html CCB payments to non-citizens • Juno News (based on official government response to parliamentary question) “Liberals dished out over $7.1 billion in CCB to non-citizens” https://www.junonews.com/p/exclusive-liberals-dished-out-71 ⸻ SECTION 6 — Family Reunification & Retirement Without Contribution Parent & Grandparent Sponsorship • IRCC – Sponsor your parents and grandparents https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/family-sponsorship/sponsor-parents-grandparents.html • IRCC – Eligibility requirements for sponsors https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/family-sponsorship/sponsor-parents-grandparents/eligibility.html Old Age Security (OAS) • Government of Canada – Old Age Security eligibility https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/publicpensions/cpp/old-age-security/eligibility.html • OAS residency requirements (10-year rule) https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/publicpensions/cpp/old-age-security/eligibility.html#h2.1 ⸻ SECTION 7 — Housing & Homelessness Federal housing & temporary accommodations • Auditor General – Housing and homelessness programs https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_202211_e_44189.html • Government of Canada – Reaching Home (Homelessness Strategy) https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/homelessness.html Hotel use for asylum seekers / newcomers • Parliamentary Budget Officer – Cost of housing asylum seekers https://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/en/publications/RP-2324-025-S–costs-asylum-seekers-canada–couts-demandeurs-asile-canada ⸻ SECTION 8 — Giving Money Away While Canadians Struggle Foreign Aid & International Spending • Global Affairs Canada – International Assistance https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/priorities-priorites.aspx • Federal Budget – International assistance & climate finance https://www.budget.canada.ca • Parliamentary Budget Officer – Canada’s international aid spending https://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/en/research–recherches?topic=international ⸻ SECTION 9 — Non-Essential & Symbolic Spending Gun Buyback Program • Government of Canada – Firearms Buyback Program https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/campaigns/firearms-buyback.html • Auditor General – Firearms program & delays https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_202305_e_44218.html Federal consultants & spending • Parliamentary Budget Officer – Use of consultants https://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/en/publications/RP-2324-015-S–use-consultants-federal-government–recours-consultants-gouvernement-federal New Brunswick affordability concerns • Government of New Brunswick – Public statements on affordability & participation limits https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/finance.html ⸻ SECTION 10 — Seniors & Medical Supply Caps Seniors care & home care limits • Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) – Home care & seniors https://www.cihi.ca/en/home-care • Auditor General – Seniors care & long-term care gaps https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_202103_e_43755.html ⸻ SECTION 11 — MAiD & End-of-Life Care MAiD program • Government of Canada – Medical Assistance in Dying https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/medical-assistance-dying.html Palliative care access • Health Canada – Palliative Care Framework https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-care-system/reports-publications/palliative-care/framework-palliative-care-canada.html • Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians – Access gaps https://www.cspcp.ca/resources/ ⸻ SECTION 12 — Forced Adaptation by Design System complexity & denial • Auditor General – Service Canada access & backlogs https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_202203_e_44161.html • Parliamentary Budget Officer – Social program access & barriers https://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/en/publications ⸻ SECTION 13 — In Closing (Foundational Law) Birthright citizenship (jus soli) • Citizenship Act – Birthright citizenship in Canada https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-29/section-3.html Sources & Verification: All claims are supported by publicly available data from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO), the Auditor General of Canada, federal budgets, and other official sources. Full links listed above.

At Davos, the contradictions of globalism are no longer subtle, they’re on full display. World leaders praise “integration” while warning that trade, supply chains, and finance are now weapons. They call China a “partner” while admitting dependence, coercion, and vulnerability. And they demand trust in a system that has hollowed out Western industry and sovereignty. Click here for today's sources: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sources-january-21-2026 Click here for Crowder Shop: https://crowdershop.com/

Official leader of the opposition Pierre Poilievre have sat down last week with our global anchor Don Friesen from how given the chance he pushed through an Alberta British Columbia pipeline to the aftermath of party deserters here's that interview Mr. Polly have a good to see you. Thanks for taking time with us today likewise and merry Christmas to you. Thanks. See you 2025. Let's talk about it. Hasn't been the easiest year for you. The conservatives did receive 41% of the popular vote in the last election. You have a lot of loyal support right across this country, which I'm sure you're very proud of, but you didn't win the election and you didn't win your own seat that would be a big blow to a lot of people in your position. Have you reflected on what went wrong? I have reflected and you write it is a big blow to a lot of people who you know who who voted for in record numbers actually vote voted for affordable food, affordable homes, safer streets after 10 years of inflation and rising crime and so we always reflect on how we can continue to inspire those 8.3 million people a record number who voted for us, but how we can inspire even more and so my message for the year to come will be one of hope. I think people desperately need hope hope that they can afford groceries. Hope they can afford homes and many have put hoping me in the past, but we have to keep inspiring them so that Moore will do so in the future what I meant with respect was a big blow to you personally have you reflected on what went wrong in the campaign in your own leadership well, yes, I have reflected and obviously my goal and one of the adjustments that we need to make is that people know that I'm a fighter but they need to know what I'm fighting for and who I'm fighting for in the lead up to the last election. You were way ahead in the polls. We didn't believe the polls you were on on your way to becoming Prime Minister when Justin Trudeau was still around when he left and a new liberal leader came on the scene your leading the polls began to diminished to the point where we said you lost the election so something happened in that time and and you can argue that more. Canadians put their faith in Mark Kearney, as a leader than in you what happened was that we got a record number of oats and the highest share of vote we've got since 1988 and now that happens to be true and I'm trying to move if you don't mind, I'm trying to move a little bit beyond that to say how do you broaden the tent now you were fighting for I think a lot of the same things you were fighting for before and as I said, you have a lot of very loyal support but if you want to take it to the next level if you're still leader when the next election is held, how do you change that equation? Well, my plan is affordability affordability affordability that is the single biggest issue facing Canadians after 10 years of liberal inflation so how do we take it to the next level we go to more people and tell them that we're going to cut back on the inflationary deficit so that dollars go further we make clear that we're going to cut taxes on work investment energy and home building so that people have to bring home more and they pay less. We're also gonna talk a lot of I've set a affordability but there's also the issue of crime. I mean 10 years of catching release has left Canadians and endangered. We're going to get repeal catch and release lock up the criminals and make it so people feel safe again in their communities there's immigration will be talking about the fact that immigration is still out of control and the government is allowing criminals and full false refugee claimants to come in and undermine our security and drain our taxpayers so those are all issues that we need to talk about in order to broaden our tent and win the support of Canadians for an affordable safe Canada under a conservative government. Is it possible that in the last election, many Canadians just thought you weren't the man for the moment and that it's your leadership. That's the issue. Well, my leadership got us a record number of votes. I know you don't like me. It is a fact though. I'm blocking our resources prediction of ideas I want to steal my ideas. I would say that they have stolen the carbon tax first thing that Mark Kearney acts and then as you as you wanted right, he's still in my words, but not the deeds so a couple of things so one I'm glad that Daniel Smith forced Mr. Carney to flip-flop on the threatened liberal production, cuts to the oil and gas sector and their costly regulations on the electricity sector. I Mr. Kearney has not committed to building a pipeline. He opposed the pipeline in question he testified against the pipeline and question and a parliamentary committee in 22, 121 and of course the liberal government in 2021 I can give you the right right but he was testifying. Are you suggesting that I know you suggest that he's he's doing this it's not it's not it's disingenuous the steel. He has assigned the memorandum of understanding with Alberta. You don't think it's real that's correct and I'll give you the background. He oppose the pipeline he testified before a parliamentary committee against that same pipeline, the liberal government killed that same pipeline in 2016 and numerous liberal members of the present caucus have already made public social media post saying it will never happen so he understands that pipelines are very popular so he wants to pretend he supports one until after the next election wealth telling people that he won't ever build one I think we need the conservative premier of Alberta seems very happy with the potential of another pipeline under Mark. Well, I want to see the reality and she said that under my leadership, we'd be well on the way to getting the pipeline done. She just said that the other day well that's why I need to win the next one and then we can actually get some projects done because this pipeline will be fantastic when it happens under a conservative garment $30 billion a year in overseas export less dependence on the Americans about $1800 and benefits per family per year and a stronger Canadian dollar, which will make our lives more affordable to buy homes and food and all of the things that you would get a pipeline built faster. What would you do to make that happen get out of the way because that's all that needs to happen right now these way of the pipeline construction, so the federal government is the only level of government that needs to approve the pipeline under our constitution section 92. The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction to approve or reject an interprovincial pipeline. The reason it doesn't happen even though it's wildly profitable and popular is that there is no federal permit to build it and the previously preapproved pipeline was then cancelled by this liberal government in 2016 so if we get the government out of the way approve a right of way the private sector and then go ahead and build a pipeline from Hardesty Alberta to the coast and so all we really need to do is get the Prime Minister out of the way because he is the only one who has the authority to approve a reject. What about the duty to consult indigenous leaders, we should do that you would do that of course, and what if through after those consultations the answer is still now well the answer is given by the Prime Minister and I am running. I'm saying if the indigenous leaders say no that I will I will thank them for their input and at the end of the day the Prime Minister has to decide in my decision and I'm telling Canadians before the election so they can vote on it is I will approve a pipeline. Nobody has a veto not under our constitution there's a duty to consult. There's no answer after the consultation. We don't want this. It won't matter to you. It's actually first of all it wouldn't matter. I would go ahead with the pipeline and I would also clarify when the liberals kill this pipeline last time in 20 1675% of indigenous communities along the path supported it they overrode and overpowered those first nations communities and I think it's a really unfortunate stereotype to say that first nations are against pipelines when the evidence is the overwhelming majority of them support it although I think the media attempt and sometimes tries to stereotype that they're all against the assembly of first nations meeting there's unanimous vote. To the Pacific at 75% of the first nations communities along the route, supporting it and benefitting from him and we have these first nations leaders in my own caucus who, for example, like Billy Moran, who is a former chief of the Uno first Nations and his community has been enriched because oil and gas has been allowed to expand first nation, support oil and gas, liberals and liberal elites often to the Pacific at 75% of the first Nations communities along the route, supporting it and benefitting from it and we have these first nations leaders in my own caucus who, for example, like Billy Moran, who is a former chief of the Uno first Nations and his community has been enriched because oil and gas has been allowed to expand first nation, support oil and gas liberals and liberal elites often try to stereotype and stigmatize first nations as being opposed to pipeline indigenous leaders who speak for themselves first but and there are those who do oppose it let me ask you about what's happened in your caucus recently. In the last month you've lost a couple of MPs two of them across the floor one is resigning. Does that send any signals to you about your leadership, signal to me that the Prime Minister tried to go trying to manipulate his way. Two of the majority that Canadians voters denied him during the election. I'm talking about conservative who I'm asking about. I'll address them. Let me let me just reach you. What one of them, Chris Donald Trump said he concluded after leaving the caucus this is from a statement that there is a better path forward than being under your leadership and he wants to be part of leading solutions rather than opposing everything and in an interview, he said being in Caucus felt a lot like a lot of the time like being in a frat house rather than being in a serious political party. What do you make of that? Well, I make of it. I look at the words that he said about it only weeks earlier about the liberal government, he said that Mark Carney's grocery price inflation was "inhumane and that Mark Kearney had broken his promise to be judged by the prices at the grocery store and then he went against the words that he spoke, and the voters who elected him for an affordable agenda, and then you have Mr. Ma, who who said also that Mark Kearney had had an irresponsible deficit that was driving up the cost of living and making life more expensive for his constituents and that now they've chosen to help Mr. Kearney add those costs on the backs of Canadians I think at the end of the day they should respect that that their constituents voted for our conservative plan for a more affordable and safe country and that's what they should respect. OK let's move onto another topic. I want to ask you about which is something that world leaders now have to deal with many of them are dealing with every day and that is President Trump. He is a unpredictable leader. I think that's fair to say people are not exactly sure how what if they're on solid ground when they're dealing with President Trump if you were Prime Minister, do you think you would be able to have reached a deal with him on tariffs and how would you feel sitting across the table from him trying to renegotiate after imagine yourself in that room well I would feel a great responsibility to defend Canadian workers and consumers, and I would live out that responsibility by getting a fair deal for the Canadian people which removes the game of which is to remove the unjustified American tariffs so that we can sell our goods into the US market and exchange for which show what we offer is a good reliable Canadian partner for minerals for energy for national international security. What would you do differently that Prime Minister Kearney has he has not been able to accomplish I'm asking you what you would do differently you know the Ontario premier calls President Trump a tyrant is that language you would use I would focus on the business relationship. We gotta get a deal at the end of the day. We're right next-door to the biggest economic force in the history of the world. My focus is on getting a deal and in the best possible arrangement for the Canadian people defend our sovereignty reopen market. I'm sure it is. Very because look we, I'm the leader that will restore the promise of this country. I share the values and purpose of our party to make this a country where hard work is rewarded food and homes are affordable where streets are safe and that's that and I've been leading the debate on all of those issues those issues that we heard you campaign very strongly in the last election when I'm asking you now is a year has passed almost a year in January won't be quite a year since the last election, but you do you feel you have to do something differently or it's the same messaging as the last campaign well like I said, I think people they know that I'm a fighter, but they have to know what I'm fighting for my wife. Why is the most important question if you lose another MP to the liberals, and I don't know if you know whether you will or not because I'm not sure there's no clarity on that it may or may not happen you would then be facing a liberal majority government and you would be opposition leader for potentially another three years. How would that sit with you? Well, I think would sit very badly with the Canadian people who voted against costly liberal you hang on as leader I'm not giving up I don't quit and the people of our party, the welders, the waitresses, the plumbers and police officers, the soldiers and small business people. They're the ones who I'm fighting for and I'm never gonna stop fighting for them. They will decide with their democratic vote. We are not a party that makes decisions through back room deals to form a costly majority government that nobody voted for, so I'm gonna keep on fighting for the Canadian people and their chance to have an affordable safe future as long as my party decides and the members and the grassroots people decide that I'm the one to champion them. Thanks for taking time with us. Thank you and merry Christmas once again.

►https://WEFReports.com | Help us keep holding the elites acountable! Ezra Levant confronts former Liberal cabinet minister Chrystia Freeland, who is now serving as an adviser to Ukraine. Needless to say, Freeland was absolutely vicious, saying that anyone who would dare question her must be working for Vladimir Putin. Visit Rebel News for more on this story ► https://rebelne.ws/3YPXujK Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story. https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content. Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous audience to help keep us reporting. Please consider supporting Rebel News by making a donation, purchasing a RebelNews+ subscription, shopping in our online store, or any of the other methods below: ►Support our independent journalism - https://rebelne.ws/donation ►We accept cryptocurrency! - http://rebelne.ws/crypto ►Rebel News Plus - Become a Premium Content subscriber - https://rebelne.ws/plus ►BUY Rebel News gear - https://rebelne.ws/store ►LISTEN to our FREE podcast - https://rebelne.ws/podcast Make sure to follow Rebel News on social media too! RUMBLE - https://rebelne.ws/rumble X - https://x.com/RebelNewsOnline INSTAGRAM - https://rebelne.ws/Instagram FACEBOOK - https://rebelne.ws/fbook

A Canadian woman campaigning for a wheelchair ramp to her private residence was instead offered a medically assisted DEATH via the MAID program! Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in Canada is a legal, health-system-delivered program for eligible adults with a serious, incurable condition, experiencing intolerable, irreversible decline. Source: illuminatibot @iluminatibot on X: https://x.com/iluminatibot/status/2014960411251245327 Buy amazing freedom fighter merchandise to help team humanity win this InfoWar - https://thealexjonesstore.com/GoodVsEvil Mirrored from / Original Video Source: Truth Provider - https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRTuy91xY3qI My Channels: NotMSM - https://rumble.com/c/NotMSM GoodVsEvil1 - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WcKcScJIjN6U/