Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People?

Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. For the greater good refers to the benefit or betterment of the majority of people, especially at the cost of smaller or individual concerns. It is a general advantage that can only be gained by losing or harming something that is considered less important. Some wars are fought for the greater good. The cutbacks that a company must face will be difficult, but they are for the greater good. The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself. What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. Welcome To The New World Order - The Year Zero - The Real Origin of the World - National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? The New World Order is Upon Us - Preserve your liberty by being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. For the greater good refers to the benefit or betterment of the majority of people, especially at the cost of smaller or individual concerns. It is a general advantage that can only be gained by losing or harming something that is considered less important. Some wars are fought for the greater good. The cutbacks that a company must face will be difficult, but they are for the greater good. The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself. From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English the greater good the greater good a general advantage that you can only gain by losing or harming something that is considered less important Some wars are fought for the greater good. great Examples from the Corpus the greater good This, I learned, was standard practice when a customer was about to be sacrificed for the greater good of Salomon. For the greater good of the parish or because he knew something? If an act promotes happiness for the most amount of people, it is good. If it decreases overall happiness, it is bad. The goal of our actions is to create the greatest happiness for the most amount of people. Since everyone’s happiness counts equally, utilitarianism considers maximizing the good from an impartial perspective, meaning that the interests of people close to you should not count higher than those of strangers. To illustrate, Plato imagined an ideal state in which private goods and nuclear families would be relinquished for the sake of the greater good of a harmonious society. Aristotle defined it in terms of a communally shared happiness, whose key constituents were wisdom, virtue and pleasure. World War One poster with the famous phrase "I want you for U. S. Army" (Get Your Covid-19 Shot Now) shows Uncle Sam pointing his finger at the viewer in order to recruit soldiers for the American Army during World War I. The printed phrase "Nearest recruiting station" (Get Your Covid-19 Shot Now) has a blank space below to add the address for enlisting. Parallel Worlds - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH Parallel worlds are hypothetical self-contained planes of existence that coexist with one's own. They are also known as alternate universes, parallel worlds, parallel dimensions, or alternate realities.0 The sum of all potential parallel universes that constitute reality is often called a "multiverse". "Parallel Worlds A Journey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, and the Future of the Cosmos" covers the Big Bang, the early development of the Universe, and parallel universes is in fiction or is it true today right now. Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion. Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the rules. Report any suspicious users to the yes I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. These are rules that visitors must follow to participate. They can be used as reasons to report or ban posts, comments, and users. Communities can have a maximum of 15 rules. 1. No uncivil, bigoted, misogynist, misandrist, racist comments or posts. - 2. No Misinformation - 3. No Memes - 4. No language error posts - 5. No jokes/satire/trolls posts - 6. Remove identifying personal information - 7. No 'likes"/"shares" posts - 8. No "Reddit Meta" Posts - 9. No posts about politicians being politicians - 10. No posts attacking a political party or side. You forgot that people also get shot for legitimately no reason now. For example, knocking on a door. Or, trying to help someone. Imagine being an American soldier in 1945 Europe, getting a glimpse into the future and you see these guys walking the Streets of your hometown. Reminds me of a few months ago, when there was a tweet going around about a question a journalist asked Harrison Ford "How would Indiana Jones feel about the rise of modern Nazis?" and Harrison's response was "Indy would push people aside to deliver the first punch." And people genuinely got upset about that? Saying nonsense about how violence isnt the answer. I'm sorry, but if you get upset about people wanting to punch Nazis, you're a Nazi sympathizer. Nazis always deserve to be punched. Always. These look to be young black people. How much of a loser do you have to be to believe all your problems are due to "other people" at that age? If it wasn't for Jews, minorities, me and my 8th grade education would be on easy street? Because freedom of speech entails allowing anyone to demonstrate, regardless of whether their beliefs are agreeable. The mistake people are making is thinking that allowing them to demonstrate is somehow an endorsement of their beliefs. It is not. Nazis are the most reviled ideology by far in the USA. These people have zero political power and are viewed with scorn. They are accomplishing nothing by marching but ousting themselves as bigots. Free speech, our first amendment grants a lot of latitude. And something like "Kill all person X" or incitement of violence is not protected, and is punished, nor is it depicted here. None of us agree with what they are doing, but many many many law suits and judgements have been argued and the law always erred on the side of Free speech. German Jews' Passports Declared Invalid On October 5, 1938, the Reich Ministry of the Interior invalidates all German passports held by Jews. Jews must surrender their old passports, which will become valid only after the letter “J” has been stamped on them. The government required Jews to identify themselves in ways that would permanently separate them from the rest of the German population. In an August 1938 law, authorities decreed that by January 1, 1939, Jewish men and women bearing first names of “non-Jewish” origin had to add “Israel” and “Sara,” respectively, to their given names. All German Jews were obliged to carry identity cards that indicated their heritage, and, in the autumn of 1938, all Jewish passports were stamped with an identifying red letter “J”. As Nazi leaders quickened their war preparations, antisemitic legislation in Germany and Austria paved the way for more radical persecution of Jews. Vs. Excelsior Pass Plus As of July 28, 2023, the Excelsior Pass Plus (EPP) and the NYS Wallet Apps will no longer be available. Following the reduced demand for access to digital COVID-19 test and vaccine records through the epass.ny.gov portal and the official end of the COVID-19 public health emergency on May 11, 2023, the NYS Wallet that hosts the Excelsior Pass Plus COVID vaccine credential, will be discontinued. Excelsior Pass Plus provided a secure, digital copy of your COVID-19 vaccination record. Your Vaccination Pass Plus provided safe access to your vaccination information and included vaccine type, site and date of vaccination, just like your CDC Vaccination Card, validated by the State of New York. Your data collected for Excelsior Pass Plus continues to be private and secure. New York has gained knowledge on digital credentialing from this effort and remains interested in the potential this type of technology could bring in the future. Vs. No shot? No service. A New Jerseyan's guide to dining in NYC with vaccination now required New York City took the unprecedented step of requiring patrons of restaurants, bars, theaters, museums and many other venues to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination for entry beginning Tuesday, Aug. 17. Although many New Jerseyans still work from their dining room tables, hundreds of thousands commute daily into New York and grab lunch there or descend on the city for some weekend fun and fine dining. Here's what you need to know about the city's "Key to NYC" vaccine mandate: What venues now require proof of vaccination? There are three main areas where proof of vaccination must be shown for entry: indoor dining, indoor entertainment and indoor fitness. But that encompasses plenty of different businesses. They include: Indoor dining: restaurants, bars, coffee shops, fast-food joints, nightclubs, catering halls, grocery stores with indoor dining, hotel banquet rooms and cafeterias. Indoor entertainment: movie theaters, museums, Broadway theaters, concert venues, sports arenas galleries, bowling alleys, arcades, pool halls, convention centers, aquariums and zoos. Indoor fitness: gyms, pools and dance studios. No shot, no proof, no service: NYC businesses begin checks No shot, no shoes, no service. Japanese American internment and America’s Concentration Camps And Covid-19 Camps Today depicts an in American history that too few know or understand the mass incarceration of loyal Americans without charge or trial solely on the basis of race. During World War II more than 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry—2/3 of whom were American citizens—were incarcerated in hastily built camps in America's deserts and wastelands. A broad outline to this experience, this exhibit tells a story of injustice and sorrow, perseverance and courage. It tells the story through words, photographs, home movies, artwork and artifacts of those who lived it. Silent and silenced for decades, they share their memories in hopes that the more we learn about what happened over fifty years ago, the less likely such an injustice will happen again to any other people. Vs. On January 6, 2021, following the defeat of President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, the leadership of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, two far-right militias, plotted to use force to stop the peaceful transition of power, culminating in an attack on the United States Capitol Building. January 6 Capitol riots latest defendants held without bail and with out charges filed in 2021 1,000+ Capitol Riot defendants are being held without bond before their trials. A landmark decision on American internment and America’s Concentration Camps And Covid-19 Camps Today with No bond ever for Capitol Riot suspects handed down by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is part of the reason why. WASHINGTON D.C., DC — The Department of Justice has arrested more than 1984+ people for taking part in the January 6 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol building. Some of those trials are months, possibly 2 to 3 years away. Verify viewer Kelley from Alexandria, Virginia asked the Verify team if some of the accused remain behind bars nearly six months later. “Is it true people arrested [for crimes on January 6th] are still being held in jail with no bail," she asked in an email. "What are the charges?" Let's Verify. THE QUESTION Are people accused of participating in the January 6th insurrection on the U.S. Capitol still being held in jail without bail? If so, what are their charges? OUR SOURCES Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court: United States v. Munchel THE ANSWER Yes, several 1,000+ people are being held without bail in the D.C. Jail for crimes they allegedly committed during the Capitol riots. WHAT WE FOUND Our Verify team turned to Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor now at West Coast Trial Lawyers, who said several Capitol Riot defendants remain in jail awaiting trial, even though some were arrested months ago. “Of the hundreds and hundreds of folks who have been arrested in the Capitol riots, the majority of them, most of them have received some sort of bail,” Rahmani said. “But the folks that engaged in the most violent acts, they are being detained without bond.” A landmark decision on bond for Capitol Riot suspects handed down by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is part of the reason why. In the case of United States v. Munchel, a three judge panel ruled those who “actually assaulted police officers and broke through windows, doors, and barricades, and those who aided, conspired with, planned, or coordinated such actions, are in a different category of dangerousness than those who cheered on the violence or entered the Capitol after others cleared the way.” The ruling instructed judges to release Capitol riot suspects, even if charged with serious crimes, unless the Department of Justice demonstrates a specific threat that defendant poses to the community. “The Court of Appeals said...the mere fact that you have these very strong political beliefs, that you had what may be considered a weapon on your person, that's not sufficient to hold someone indefinitely if they didn't engage in the most violent acts,” Rahmani said. "The court did, however, distinguish between folks that actually did assault police officers did, you know, break windows force open doors and those types of things.” Which is why people like Julian Khater and George Tanios are still in jail on charges of Assault on Federal Officer with Dangerous Weapon and Conspiracy to Injure an Officer, among others, for allegedly spraying pepper spray into the faces of law enforcement like Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick. Thomas Sibick is being held until his trial without bond on charges that include Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers and Taking from a Person Anything of Value by Force and Violence, because he’s accused of being part of the savage attack on DC Police Officer Mike Fanone and ripping Fanone’s badge and radio right off his uniform. A number of the Proud Boys militia, and even an Oath Keeper named Jessica Watkins, have also been denied pre-trial release, not because they assaulted police, but because they are charged with conspiracy with other members of their militias to pre-plan the attack on the Capitol. Conspiracy is also one of those thresholds the courts have decided you cannot cross if a judge is going to rule someone is not a threat to the community and eligible for pre-trial release. Rahmani said that for prosecutors arguing for defendants to be held without bond, it goes beyond protecting the safety of the community. “The biggest reason why federal prosecutors want to hold someone without bail is that it's much easier to get a plea agreement and a deal when someone's already in federal prison,” Rahmani said. “It's very difficult, especially for someone who has no criminal history, to sign that plea agreement and agree to surrender and go to federal prison. So, some of it is actually danger to the community, but some of it is actually strategy and tactics to get folks to plead guilty.” Still, judges have discretion to interpret the law as they see fit and some defense attorneys argue the decisions about who is released and who is detained aren’t always consistent. “Different judges have very different views on whether this conduct is dangerous,” Rahmani. “And it's a random rotation, and it's the luck of the draw.” A judge cited that same court of appeals ruling in ordering the release of Federico Klein, a State Department appointee of former President Donald Trump who is facing charges he assaulted police officers with a riot shield. That judge ruled that it was a "close call" but in his opinion, that judge deemed Klein does not pose a "substantial threat to the community" despite his "demonstrated willingness to use force to advance his personal beliefs." So we can Verify, yes, some people arrested for crimes on January 6th are still being held in jail without bail, all of which are being housed at the D.C. Jail. The Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki are founding documents of modern medical ethics that articulate a core set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation and clinical care. The Nuremberg Code focuses on the human rights of research subjects, the Declaration of Helsinki focuses on the obligations of physician-investigators to research subjects, and the federal regulations emphasize the obligations of research institutions that receive federal funds. Both the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki served as models for the current U.S. federal research regulations, which require not only informed consent of the research subject but also prior peer review of research protocols by a committee that includes a representative of the community. The Nuremberg Code was formulated 50 years ago, in August 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, by American judges sitting in judgment of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the concentration camps. The Declaration of Helsinki dealt with clinical research more directly, but was portrayed as a weakening of the stringent protections of Nuremberg. Issued by the Nuremberg Military Tribunal in 1947, the Nuremberg Code is a 10-point statement meant to prevent future abuse of human subjects. It states that, above all, participation in research must be voluntary. The other points are as follows: The results of the research must be useful and unobtainable by other means. The study must be rationally based on knowledge of the disease or condition to be studied. It must avoid unnecessary suffering. The study cannot include death or disabling injury as a foreseeable consequence. Its benefits must outweigh its risks. The study must use proper facilities to protect participants. The study must be conducted by qualified individuals. Participants may withdraw from the study if they wish. Investigators must be prepared to stop the study should participants die or become disabled as a result of participation. The Nuremberg Code was created by opining on the testimony of physician witnesses and was said to represent current thoughts on the topic of human experimentation. Although intended to refer to this particular trial and never formally adopted by any state or international agency, the Nuremberg Code has been tremendously influential—becoming the basis of later documents that are highly relevant to research today. https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Wiesing-DoH-Helsinki-20141111.pdf https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf A number of callers have asked whether compulsory vaccination breaches the Nuremberg Code. The short answer is no and it is laughable to suggest so. Following the Allied victory over Germany, the Allied powers enacted the International Military Tribunal on 19th November 1945. As part of the Tribunal, a series of legal trials were held against major war criminals and Nazi sympathisers. Crimes Against Humanity The first trial conducted under the Nuremberg Military Tribunals in 1947 became known as The Doctors’ Trial. In that trial, some 23 doctors from the German Nazi Party were tried for crimes against humanity. These doctors conducted atrocious experiments on unwilling prisoners of war, many taking place in the infamous Auschwitz concentration camp holding Jewish prisoners later to become known as the Holocaust. The point of the Nuremberg Code was to stamp out and protect humans involved in medical experiments and trials from cruel and life-threatening medical and surgical procedures. The 10 Elements of the Nuremberg Code are: Voluntary consent is essential. The results of an experiment must be for the greater good of society. Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation. Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury. No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability. The risks should never exceed the benefits. Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects. Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists. Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time. The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur. Vaccinations for Covid-19 are not experimental. In producing the Astrazeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer vaccine the makers followed well-established protocols during clinical trials. To even suggest that compulsory Covid-19 vaccination comes anywhere near what people went through during the Holocaust simply shows the complete ignorance of some. Nuremberg Code Emergency Laws Mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations do not fall under the Nuremberg Code. In any event, emergency laws promulgated in the various States and Territories prevail. COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination Legal and Bioethical Controversies The imposition of compulsory health treatments has always been a subject of animated legal and bioethical debate. What is at stake are two opposing interests that are in their own way protected by international treaties and constitutional provisions: the right to individual self-determination and the duty to defend and preserve collective safety. The global health crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic has placed the issue of the legitimacy of imposing compulsory vaccination at the center of the multifaceted debate on pandemic health policies. Indonesia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and the Federated States of Micronesia are currently the only four countries in the world where the COVID-19 vaccine is mandatory for all citizens. Italy was the first country in the European Union to introduce this obligation, effective from 8 January 2022 by virtue of the decree-law approved on 5 January 2022, which imposed vaccination compulsory for everyone over the age of 50. Similar paths have been undertaken by Greece and Austria, where the obligation will start respectively on 16 January 2022 (for citizens aged over 60) and 1 February 2022 (for citizens of all ages). However, in many civilized countries, “selective” forms of compulsory vaccination, i.e., aimed at specific categories of individuals, especially healthcare professionals, are already provided for. The present work aims to offer a concise and as much as possible exhaustive overview of the main ethical and legal issues related to compulsory COVID-19 vaccination, with reference to both the Italian and the international context, mainly European. Introduction On 4 November 2021, the World Health Organization officially declared the entry into the fourth pandemic wave, identifying Europe as the epicenter of the new epidemic phase. Although the proportion of the population fully vaccinated against COVID-19 is encouraging in industrialized countries (70% of the population in the US and Canada, 67% in South America, 64% in Asia and 62% in Europe have received at least one dose) (1), the impact of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy could be a major hindrance to this delicate phase of the pandemic fight. The international epidemiological trend has brought the issue of compulsory vaccination, temporarily neglected during the summer break, back to the attention of national institutions. COVID-19 vaccination is already compulsory in many countries for specific categories of workers, mostly healthcare professionals, but a mandatory vaccination extended indiscriminately to the entire population is still largely unprecedented. There are currently four countries in the world where COVID-19 vaccine is mandatory for all citizens: Indonesia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and the Federated States of Micronesia. On 5 January 2022, the Italian government approved a decree-law imposing compulsory vaccination for all citizens over the age of 50, which came into force on 8 January 2022. Italy was thus the first European country to adopt a form of compulsory vaccination extended to the entire population (albeit with a fixed age limit). On November 19, 2021, Austrian Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced that in Austria the COVID-19 vaccine will be mandatory for all citizens from February 2022. On 30 November 2021, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis declared that vaccination against COVID-19 will be compulsory in Greece from 16 January 2022 for all citizens over the age of 60. Although the subject of hundreds of years of jurisprudential and bioethical reflection, the issue of the imposition of compulsory health treatment is still, in 2021, very far from seeing an unambiguous and shared key to interpretation. Striking a fair balance between the protection of individual autonomy and the protection of collective health is in fact extraordinarily complex, especially when set in the peculiar epidemiological and scientific context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is because the COVID-19 vaccine has completely new features, from the technology used to make it to the particular way in which it combats the disease. This unique profile makes the discussion on compulsory vaccination particularly intriguing and raises legal and bioethical issues that have never before been addressed. At the Dawn of Compulsory Vaccination: the Fight Against Smallpox The first compulsory vaccination policy in history dates back to the late 18th century, during the American Revolutionary War, when General George Washington required his troops to be inoculated with the smallpox virus in 1777. Of all the diseases affecting the continental army, smallpox was one of the most fearsome threats, as it had a mortality rate of 10 to 60% in non-immune hosts. According to historians' estimates, at the end of the 7-year war, nine times as many soldiers died of the disease consequences (63,000) as died in battle (7,000). Washington had the merit of recognizing the seriousness of the disease early on and devising an effective immunization strategy for his army, which gave his troops a significant physical and psychological advantage over their opponents. A few years later, in 1796, English physician and naturalist Edward Jenner officially tested the first vaccine against smallpox by injecting a child's arm with a small amount of pus taken from the bumps of a woman suffering from cowpox, a form of smallpox that affects cows and, to a lesser extent, humans. Jenner concluded that cowpox inoculation was a safe alternative to human smallpox virus inoculation and equally effective in terms of protection against smallpox disease. After the scientific community recognized the efficacy and safety of the vaccine, the practice of smallpox vaccination spread widely in Europe, and several countries introduced mandatory vaccination requirements for their citizens, such as Norway in 1811, Russia in 1812 and Sweden in 1816. The first western nation to introduce free, universal, and compulsory smallpox vaccination was England with the Vaccination Acts of 1840, 1853 and 1867. The 1840 text provided for the smallpox vaccine to be free of charge and prohibited the variolation procedure, i.e., the inoculation of the subject to be immunized with human smallpox virus taken from an infected subject (the immunization technique practiced before Jenner's smallpox vaccine was developed). The 1856 Act made vaccination compulsory for all children up to 3 months and established penalties for non-compliance. The 1867 text tightened up the penalties for those who refused to vaccinate their children and introduced imprisonment for practicing variolation. In the following decades, the outbreak of new smallpox epidemics triggered by the Franco-Prussian war prompted many European states to introduce compulsory vaccination. In the United States of America, in 1905 the Supreme Federal Court issued a landmark judgement that legitimized the authority of states to “reasonably” violate personal liberties during a public health crisis by fining those who refused vaccination. In the late 1960s, the World Health Assembly (WHA) initiated a strategic plan for the definitive eradication of the smallpox virus, which led to Resolution 11.54, adopted in 1958 by the Eleventh World Health Assembly. On 1 January 1967, the World Health Organization launched the smallpox eradication programme, which led to the eradication of the virus in 1980. The worldwide effort to combat the disease made it possible to eradicate a virus that was responsible for 500 million deaths between the XIX and XX centuries, mainly through compulsory vaccination. Compulsory Vaccination in the European Regulatory Context The primary legal reference for the protection of fundamental human rights in the European regulatory context is the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), signed in Rome in 1950, in force since 1953, and adopted by the 47 member states of the Council of Europe. Article 8 (“Right to respect for private and family life”) states that “1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic wellbeing of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others”. According to the Convention, therefore, forms of interference with the right to individual privacy are permitted whenever necessary to protect the public health of a democratic society. This principle found a recent practical application in judgement no. 116/2021 of 8 April 2021 (Vavrička and others v. Czech Republic) by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which rejected the appeal of the parents of some Czech minors against national legislation prohibiting non-vaccinated children from enrolling in nursery school. The Strasbourg Court interpreted the imposition of compulsory vaccination against the 10 vaccine-preventable childhood infectious diseases (diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, Haemophilus influenzae type b infections, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, measles, mumps, rubella and–for children with specified health indications–pneumococcal infections) for admission to nursery school as a means of protecting public health, and as such not violating Article 8 of the ECHR. The judgement sets out in detail the seven requirements that justify the interference in private life by national legislation: 1. The primary objective of compulsory vaccination must be to protect public health. 2. The imposition of compulsory vaccination must be based on a “pressing social need”, e.g., due to a low rate of spontaneous vaccination against a specific disease that could threaten public health. 3. “Relevant and sufficient reasons” are needed to impose mandatory vaccination. 4. The safety level of vaccines must be carefully evaluated in relation to scientific evidence. 5. The obligation cannot apply to persons with contraindications to the administration of the vaccine. 6. The obligation must be enforced through penalties for non-compliance, and may not provide for the forced administration of the vaccine. 7. The possibility for persons contesting penalties arising from non-compliance with the obligation to initiate appeals should be guaranteed. Another important normative reference is represented by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, signed in Nice in 2000 and legally binding for the European institutions and member states with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2007. Article 1 (Human dignity) states: “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”. Article 3 (Right to the integrity of the person) establishes: “Everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity. In the fields of medicine and biology, the following must be respected in particular: the free and informed consent of the person concerned, according to the procedures laid down by law; the prohibition of eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons; the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain; the prohibition of the reproductive cloning of human beings”. The concept of free and informed consent expressed in Article 3 is borrowed from the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention), the first international treaty on bioethics, signed in Oviedo (Spain) on April 4, 1997, and entered into force on December 1, 1999, following ratification by the first five member states of the European Union. Article 5 of the Oviedo Convention states: “An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks”. The Legal bases of Compulsory Vaccination in the Italian Legal System In the Italian legal system, the right to health is enshrined in the Constitution, which in Article 32 states that “The Republic safeguards health as a fundamental right of the individual and as a collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent. No one may be obliged to undergo any health treatment except under the provisions of the law. Under any circumstances, the law may not violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person”. Therefore, health is not only a “fundamental right of the individual” but also a “collective interest”. The Italian Constitution aims on the one hand to protect the individual's right to self-determination, and on the other to guarantee the health of the community. The protection of public health may entail the imposition of compulsory health treatments, which would not be permitted under normal conditions, but which becomes legitimate if provided for by specific laws. The Italian Constitutional Court, the main constitutional guarantee body, which is called upon to verify the conformity of state and regional laws and acts having the force of law with the Constitution, fully illustrated the concept of balancing the protection of the right to individual self-determination and the safeguarding of public health in judgement no. 307 of 22 June 1990, concerning the constitutional legitimacy of compulsory polio vaccination for children within the first year of life: “… the law imposing a medical treatment is not incompatible with article 32 of the Constitution if the treatment is aimed at improving or preserving the state of health of those subject to it, but also at preserving the state of health of others, since it is precisely this further purpose, pertaining to health as an interest of the community, which justifies the compression of that self-determination of man which is inherent in the right of everyone to health as a fundamental right”. Similarly, in 1994, the same Court held that the protection of collective health “implies and includes the duty of the individual not to damage or endanger the health of others through his or her own behavior, in observance of the general principle that each person's right is limited by mutual recognition and equal protection of the coexisting rights of others”. In that judgment, no. 218 of 2 June 1994, the Court declared unconstitutional Article 5 of Law no. 135 of 5 June 1990 on AIDS (18), which provided that no one could be tested for HIV infection without his or her consent except on the grounds of clinical necessity in his or her own interest. In fact, the judges considered that the provision represented a prejudice to collective health, since “Article 32 of the Constitution implies the duty to protect the right of third parties who come into necessary contact with the person for activities involving a serious risk, not voluntarily assumed, of contagion”. Another recent confirmation of the non-incompatibility of the imposition of compulsory vaccination with Article 32 of the Constitution came again from the Italian Constitutional Court in 2018. With judgement no. 5 of January 18, 2018, the Italian Constitutional Court declared partly inadmissible and partly unfounded the question of constitutional illegitimacy raised by the Veneto region in relation to the vaccination requirement introduced by Law 119/2017 (transition from 4 to 10 mandatory vaccines for children from 0 to 16 years of age). The reasons for the judgement state: “The law imposing a health treatment is not incompatible with Art. 32 Cost. This is the case if the treatment is intended not only to improve or preserve the state of health of the person undergoing it, but also to preserve the state of health of others; if it is provided that it does not adversely affect the state of health of the person who is obliged to undergo it, except only for those consequences that appear normal and, therefore, tolerable; and if, in the hypothesis of further damage, the payment of an equitable indemnity in favor of the damaged party is provided for, and this regardless of the parallel protection of compensation …”. Regarding the last sentence of the judgment extract, the reference is to Law 210/1992 (“Economic indemnity for persons affected by irreversible pathological impairment following compulsory vaccinations, transfusions, and administration of hemoderivatives”), which protects victims of permanent damage deriving from compulsory health treatments, offering them the possibility of receiving adequate financial compensation after an appropriate medical-legal evaluation. Another constitutional principle of central importance in qualifying the imposition of compulsory health treatments is that set out in Article 2: “The Republic recognizes and guarantees the inviolable rights of the person, both as an individual and in the social groups where human personality is expressed. The Republic expects that the fundamental duties of political, economic and social solidarity be fulfilled”. Article 2 enshrines the principle of social solidarity between the individual and the community, according to which the citizen, as a member of a community, is called upon to act not only for his own personal interests, but also to protect collective interests. Thus, the combined provisions of Articles 32 and 2 of the Italian Constitution make the legitimacy of compulsory vaccination conditional on an appropriate balance between protecting the health of the individual and the community. In the near future (since the official publication of the decree-law passed on 5 January 2022), the vaccine will be compulsory in Italy for all citizens over the age of 50. Until 31 December 2021, the COVID-19 vaccine was compulsory in Italy for all healthcare professions and workers, pursuant to Article 4 of Decree-Law no. 44/2021. This was, in fact, a “selective” vaccination requirement, in that it was intended for a specific category of workers, and a “temporary” one, operating until 31 December 2021. According to the provisions of the law, failure to comply with the vaccination requirement by those who “carry out their activities in public or private health, social and health care and social assistance structures, in pharmacies or parapharmacies and professional offices” results in the suspension of the right to perform services or tasks involving interpersonal contacts. As a matter of fact, SARS-CoV-2 is classified as a human pathogenic agent of risk group 3) according to Art. 267 of Legislative Decree no. 81/2008 (the so-called “Unified Text on Occupational Safety and Health”), i.e., the category that “includes pathogenic microorganisms that can cause disease in humans and pose a serious risk to workers; they can spread in the community but effective prophylactic or therapeutic measures are usually available”. In line with this principle, EU Directive 2020/739 of 3 June 2020 also included SARS-CoV2 among the biological agents against which protection in the workplace is mandatory. On the basis of the combined provisions of Article 267 of Legislative Decree 81/2008 and Article 2087 of the Civil Code (which states that the employer is obliged to protect the physical integrity of employees), on 19 March 2021 the Court of Belluno issued an ordinance declaring legitimate the conduct of the management of a nursing home that had deemed unfit for duty and forced to take leave 10 healthcare workers who had refused to undergo the COVID-19 vaccine. The ordinance, therefore, rejected the appeal filed by the claimants, who argued the constitutional illegitimacy of Article 4 of Decree-Law no. 44/2021 insofar as it obliged healthcare workers to vaccinate. The Court held that the question was manifestly unfounded, since the imposition of medical treatment aimed at protecting the health of others is entirely compatible with the Italian Constitution, provided that the subject is guaranteed fair compensation in the event of damage beyond normal foreseeability. Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccine: the Reasons for Controversy The vast majority of civilized countries require their citizens to undergo a series of compulsory vaccinations starting from childhood. In Italy, for example, all minors between zero and 16 years of age and unaccompanied foreign minors must undergo 10 vaccinations. Children who are not up to date with vaccinations cannot access school services. The imposition of compulsory health treatments such as childhood vaccinations was always accompanied by a lively bioethics debate, which however never reached even remotely the proportions of the dispute regarding the compulsory vaccine against COVID-19. This is because COVID-19 vaccines have characteristics that make their mandatory imposition particularly controversial, chief among them the lack of final approval by regulators in many countries. With particular reference to the European context, any pharmaceutical company wishing to market a drug within the European Union must first apply for marketing authorization by submitting an application to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Based on recommendations provided by the EMA, which carefully evaluates the drug efficacy and safety profiles, the European Commission can issue 3 types of authorization: emergency use authorization (EUA), conditional marketing authorization (CMA), and standard marketing authorization (SMA). So far, the European Commission has granted four conditional marketing authorizations for vaccines developed by BioNTech and Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, after the EMA gave a positive assessment of their safety and efficacy. The other vaccines are at different stages of evaluation. Conditional marketing authorization is granted in cases where not all the clinical data for a drug required for standard authorization are available, but the benefit of placing the drug on the market immediately is considered to outweigh the risks related to the temporary incompleteness of the data. Conditional marketing authorization is granted when 4 requirements are simultaneously met: there is a favorable benefit-risk ratio for the drug; all conditions are in place to believe that the pharmaceutical company will be able to provide complete data after authorization; the medicine meets an unmet medical need; and the benefit of the drug's immediate availability to patients outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still needed. Conditional marketing authorization is valid for 1 year and may be renewed. The conditional marketing authorization imposes several obligations on the authorization holder that must be fulfilled within defined time frames, such as collecting additional data to demonstrate that the drug is effective and safe. The marketing authorization can be converted to a standard marketing authorization once the marketing authorization holder meets the imposed obligations and complete data confirm that the drug's benefits continue to outweigh the risks. The procedure for authorizing the marketing of a drug under the American regulatory authority, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), has similar characteristics, but is carried out more quickly due to the implementation of streamlined procedures such as “fast track”, “priority review”, and “accelerated approval”. This procedural simplification enabled the US FDA to grant final approval of the mRNA vaccine developed by BioNTech and Pfizer on 23 August 2021 for everyone over 16. Until then, commercialization of the vaccine in the United States had been granted by virtue of an emergency use authorization dated 11 December 2020. The vaccines developed by Moderna and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV are still marketed in the US due to an emergency authorization issued by the FDA on 18 December 2020 and 27 February 2021, respectively. The relatively unknown nature of the etiological agent responsible for the COVID-19 disease and the development of vaccines in an extraordinarily short timeframe make the described criticalities in the path to final approval of vaccines quite natural. In any case, it should be noted that, regardless of the marketing approval process, the COVID-19 vaccine is the first drug in history to have benefited from a “real-life” test of exceptional proportions, having been administered to over 5.5 billion people and having shown absolutely satisfactory efficacy and safety profiles. Regarding safety, according to EMA data, as of 28 October 2021, 412,571 adverse effects have been reported in 428,000,000 doses of Comirnaty vaccine administered to European citizens (0.09%), 214,528 in 68,800,000 doses of Vaxzevria (0.31%), 94,636 in 61,600,000 doses of Spikevax (0.15%) and 28,244 in 16,300,000 doses of Janssen (0.17%). The vast majority of recorded adverse effects were mild or moderate. Regarding efficacy, although COVID-19 vaccines show relatively modest effectiveness in preventing the contraction of viral infection, their overall ability to control the onset of serious illness requiring hospitalization and intensive care has been proven by the world's most authoritative clinical studies. Important decisions on compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 have been taken within the European institutions. The Council of Europe, the main international organization committed to protecting human rights, separate and independent from the European Union, signed Resolution no. 2361 on 27 January 2021 (“Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations”). The text clearly rules out the possibility of individual states making the COVID-19 vaccine compulsory and prohibits its use as a means of discrimination. In points 7.3.1 and 7.3.2, the Resolution requires member states to: “… ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to be vaccinated if they do not wish to do so; ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated”. However, this Resolution, being issued by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, is not a source of law, and is therefore neither binding nor mandatory for individual member states. A possible conflict between the domestic law of one of the European States and the Council of Europe Resolution never implies illegality of the national rules. This is not the case for the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, which is called upon to check whether national laws comply with the principles laid down in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Strasbourg Court has so far ruled on cases related to the COVID-19 pandemic on three occasions. In the first case (Le Mailloux v. France, 5 November 2020, declaration of inadmissibility), concerning a French citizen who claimed that national legislation had failed to comply with the positive obligations to protect life and health of persons enshrined in Article 2 ECHR by not providing citizens with adequate means of defense against the spread of the virus (masks and tests), the Court dismissed the application because the applicant did not have “victim” status. The second case concerns a Romanian citizen's appeal against the imposition of lockdown, which allegedly violated Article 5 of the ECHR, protecting personal freedom (Terheş v. Romania, 13 April 2021, declaration of inadmissibility). The Court dismissed the appeal because the lockdown does not impose restrictions that can be regarded as a “deprivation of liberty” within the meaning of Article 5 ECHR. The third case concerns an application for provisional measures made by 672 French firefighters, who invoking Articles 2 and 8 of the ECHR asked the Strasbourg Court to suspend as an interim measure the provisions of the French law no. 2021–1040 of 5 August 2021 imposing on their category the vaccination requirement to work (Abgrall and 671 Others v. France, 24 August 2021, rejection of requests for interim measures). The Court rejected the appeal of the 672 firefighters as being outside the scope of Article 39 of the Rules of Court, which governs the conditions for adopting interim measures. Indeed, the Court stated that granting interim measures is possible only in exceptional circumstances, when the applicants would otherwise face “a real risk of irreversible harm”. However, it must be emphasized that this judgment excludes the existence of conditions suitable for the adoption of emergency protective measures, and in no way precludes the possibility that the Court may subsequently declare the admissibility of the firemen's action concerning the compatibility of the French legislation with the principles of the ECHR. In summary, therefore, in none of the three decisions of inadmissibility the Strasbourg Court tackled head-on the question of the legitimacy of compulsory vaccination. How to Enforce a Potential Obligation? Another central issue regarding the actual applicability of a direct vaccination obligation to all nation citizens concerns how this obligation would be enforced. Basically, two compulsory vaccination policies are conceivable. The first consists of a highly coercive strategy, a “hard” compulsory vaccination, whereby the drug is administered against the individual's will through the intervention of law enforcement. The second, decidedly softer, option is to bar people who have not been vaccinated from participating in social and working life by adopting a vaccination passport. The policy of forced inoculation presents countless critical elements in its hypothetical application and must therefore be considered as merely abstract. On the other hand, the vaccine passport strategy is far more feasible and is in fact already partially applied in EU countries. The application is “partial” because not only vaccinated citizens, but also citizens who have recovered or tested negative to a molecular swab carried out within the last 72 h can obtain the EU digital COVID certificate. Shifting from a partial application of the digital COVID certificate to an extensive application, i.e., a vaccination passport granted only to those who have been vaccinated, would in fact represent the imposition of a vaccination obligation. However, according to this provision, there would be a thorny new issue to be addressed, that of the actual usefulness of vaccinating people who have recovered from COVID-19, and are therefore naturally immunized. Scientific evidence suggests that healed individuals with adequate antibody levels are more protected from reinfection than vaccinated people. Vaccination against COVID in recovered individuals may even be burdened with a higher probability of adverse effects. In accordance with these scientific data, it would not be unreasonable to grant vaccination passports not only to those who have been vaccinated, but also to those who can prove that they have recovered from the infection, as is the case in Switzerland. However, it should be noted that the introduction of a vaccine passport as a prerequisite for access to social and working life would have a paradoxical effect, i.e., it would exacerbate restrictions on the personal freedom of the population instead of restoring the freedoms of all (the primary objective of vaccination). In the light of this reflection, the choice of basing the compulsory vaccination policy on the immunity passport would therefore be counterproductive. This would open up a third way in which the compulsory vaccination could be enforced: the imposition of fines on individuals who do not wish to be vaccinated. The idea of creating a specific offense and the related criminal consequences (arrest and imprisonment) to punish those who do not intend to undergo vaccination is to be discarded, for the simple reason that no judicial system would be able to withstand the impact of such a measure. Italy, for example, had around 5.5 million unvaccinated people at the beginning of 2022, for which an equal number of criminal prosecutions should be initiated. A financial penalty for those who do not comply with the vaccination requirement would be much more feasible. This fine, however, to fulfill the task at hand, should be of such a magnitude as to have a substantial impact on the person's economic status. In other words, a system of economic penalties that provides for monetary sanctions commensurate with the income of the person sanctioned would be effective, as is already the case in some countries (Switzerland and Finland). In Italy, the size of economic sanctions is not related to the financial resources of the individual, and the definition of a fixed monetary amount as a fine to be paid in case of non-compliance with the vaccination obligation would lead to an obvious social inequity, with rich people willing to pay in order to preserve their non-vaccinated status and poor people forced to comply with the legal obligation. Conclusion The alarming rate of progression of the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in Europe, has placed the issue of compulsory vaccination at the center of the international legal and bioethical debate. As shown by the brief collection of principles enshrined in international treaties and jurisprudential pronouncements proposed, the right to individual self-determination is not configurable as intangible, being subordinate to the duty to ensure public safety. In this sense, in accordance with the legal guidelines outlined above, we consider the legal bases for imposing a generalized vaccination obligation to be sufficiently sound. Obviously, such an obligation must be based on reliable scientific data attesting to the absolute safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. Although authorizations for these vaccines are still largely conditional (only in the United States has one vaccine obtained final approval), it cannot be forgotten that more than 2 years after the pandemic broke out, SARS-CoV2 is putting even the most advanced health systems in serious difficulty. Vaccines have proved a great way to kill you and family's and to be an extraordinarily effective tool in containing the spread of the infection and limiting hospitalizations and planned for your deaths. Their safety and efficacy have been widely proven in studies carried out all over the world. These safety and efficacy profiles have enabled these drugs to obtain conditional approvals from the major regulatory agencies. These authorizations, although “conditional”, were granted after a thorough and scrupulous process of verifying the existence of a benefit-risk balance in favor of the benefits. As for adverse events, although their existence is undeniably documented, it is absolutely impossible to imagine that a worldwide vaccination campaign could result in an absolute absence of undesirable effects. Although it may therefore seem anomalous to impose a compulsory requirement for drugs that have not yet been definitively approved, in our opinion 4 the greater good and the extraordinary and exceptional nature of the plandemic situation makes it fully justifiable. In our view 4 the greater good, waiting for the final authorizations to be granted by new world order before imposing compulsory vaccination (or death its your choose) 4 the greater good of earth... it would pose a serious danger of delay in the fight against the fourth plandemic wave. The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good.

The film starts by following two people who go to a market and shows how they spread the virus to others. Eventually, their whole neighborhood gets infected. The film then explains ways we can protect ourselves and those around us. The story continues as a woman gets sick with the virus. Her family stays home so they don’t infect others, and learn the rules that they need to follow to stay safe while caring for her. The film makes the invisible coronavirus visible, and helps people grasp transmission in a simple and visual way. Through our experience with our animated films on cholera and Ebola, we learned that the image of the visible germ stays with people, helping them make the necessary behavior changes to protect themselves and others and prevent the disease from spreading. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Funeral Embalmer: 85% of Dead Bodies Now Have Strange Blood Clots Since COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-outs 80 Canadian Doctors DEAD Following COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates as Death Toll Continues to Rise 4,500 Dead Babies in VAERS From Pregnant Women Injected with COVID-19 Shots, but Florida Only Pulls COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendation for Young Men 32 Young Canadian Doctors “Died Suddenly” in the Past 16 Months While Fully COVID-19 Vaccinated SADS: “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” Explodes as Young and Healthy Adults Die Following COVID Vaccine Mandates 76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines 6 Canadian Medical Doctors Died Within 2 Weeks After 4th COVID Booster Shots for Employees Started at One Hospital 76,253 Dead 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. Injecting Babies with COVID-19 Vaccines: Brain Damage, Seizures, Rashes are Recorded Side Effects in VAERS Official Government Data Record 74,783 Deaths and 5,830,235 Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S. and Europe 45,316 Dead 4,416,778 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions – Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is New Category to Deny Vaccine Deaths FDA had Data Showing 82% – 97% of Pregnant Women Injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Lost Their Babies Before Approving the Shots 44,821 Dead 4,351,483 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Cases of Brain Damage in Children Skyrocket Following COVID-19 Vaccines Recorded Cases of Heart Disease Among Under 40 Years Old Explodes 20,000% After COVID-19 Vaccines Roll Out Killer COVID Vaccines: 4,400% Increase in Deaths Compared to All FDA-Approved Vaccines for Previous 30 Years 4,113 Fetal Deaths in VAERS Following COVID-19 Vaccines Not Including Those Murdered Alive to Develop the Vaccines 43,898 Dead,4,190,493 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Millions of American Lives in Danger as Airline Pilots Suffer Heart Problems from Mandatory COVID Vaccines 43,000 Deaths 4 MILLION Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European European Database of Adverse Reactions 1000% Increase in Vaccine Deaths and Injuries Following Pfizer COVID-19 EUA Vaccine for 5 to 11 Year Olds 42,507 DEAD 3,984,978 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions 17,500% Increase in Heart Disease in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines – This is NOT Rare! 22,000% Increase in Deaths following COVID Vaccines for Adults Over 50 as FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for this Age Group COVID-19 Vaccine Massacre: 68,000% Increase in Strokes, 44,000% Increase in Heart Disease, 6,800% Increase in Deaths Over Non-COVID Vaccines Moderna Seeks Approval from FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) to Start Injecting Children Under 6 with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines 41,834 DEAD 3.9 Million Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database as U.S. Military Deaths Soar 1100% The Thousands of Fetal Deaths Recorded After COVID-19 Vaccines that Nobody Wants to Report and that Facebook is Trying Hard to Censor 65,615 Deaths Now Reported in Europe and the USA Following COVID-19 Vaccines – Corporate Media Refuses to Publish this Data 2000% Increase in Fetal Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines but CDC Still Recommends Them for Pregnant Women Official Government Data: Twice as Many Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines in 1 Year as Deaths Following All Vaccines for the Previous 30 Years California Nurse: “I Want People to Know What I Lost to this Vaccine – I am Living a Nightmare, It’s Not Worth it.” German Health Insurance Claims Show 31,254 Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines While Official Government Stats Report Only 2,255 68,000% Increase in Strokes as FDA and HIH Secretly Study Reports of Neurological Injuries After COVID-19 Vaccines 40,000 Deaths Following COVID Shots in European Database as Life Insurance Death Claims Skyrocket 34-Year-Old Canadian Father Drops Dead in Front of His Daughters After COVID-19 Vaccine 6-Year-Old Minnesota Boy Develops Myocarditis And Becomes Severely Injured After Receiving Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Double-Vaccinated 20-Year-Old Florida Model Develops Myocarditis, Suffers Heart Attack And Has Both Legs Amputated Comedian Collapses on Stage During Joke: “I’m vaxxed, double vaxxed, boosted, and Jesus loves me most” GENOCIDE! Military Medical Whistleblowers Reveal Miscarriages, Birth Defects, and Infertility Rates Exploded in 2021 Following COVID Vaccines Government VAERS Data Reveal 15,600% Increase in Heart Disease Among Under 30 Year-Olds Following COVID-19 Vaccination COVID-19 Vaxxed Olympic Gold Medalist Dies at 51 but Media Calls Him “Anti-Vaxxer” Over 1 Million Deaths and Injuries Following COVID “Vaccines” Reported in VAERS as Second Year of “Experimental Use Authorization” Begins 2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020 Actor Bob Saget “Dies Suddenly” 1 Month After Receiving COVID Booster Shot Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs Year 2021 was America’s Holocaust: Unprecedented Lives Destroyed by Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines” One Year Anniversary of President Trump Forcing the FDA to give Emergency Use Authorization to the Pfizer Shot Registered Nurse Suffers Pericarditis from Pfizer Shot – Put in Hospital Section for Vaccine Injured as She was 7th Patient Admitted That Day for Heart Issues Following COVID Shots #RealNotRare New Website for COVID-19 Vaccine Injured German Study Finds ZERO COVID-19 Deaths in Healthy Children but the Children are Now Dying from the Vaccine 666 Cases of Heart Disease in 12 to 17-Year-Olds After COVID Shots – Less than 2 Cases Per Year Following All Vaccines for Past 30+ Years 7-Year-Old Girl Has Stroke and Brain Hemorrhage 7 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Shot Vaccine Cult Exposed by Government’s Own Data: More than 50% of ALL Vaccine Adverse Reactions Reported for Past 30+ Years Have Occurred in Past 11 Months Following COVID-19 Shots A List Of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving a COVID-19 Shot Fully Vaccinated Pro-Vaccine Canadian Senator Dead at the Age of 56 Bill Gates Charged with Murder for COVID-19 Vaccine Death in India’s High Court – Death Penalty Sought Pfizer’s War on Children Invades Canada and Israel as COVID Shots Begin to be Injected Into 5 to 11 Year Olds Families of South Korea’s COVID Vaccine Victims Mourn Loved Ones During Mass Memorial Service Vaccinated Doctors are Dying and Unvaccinated Doctors are Quitting or Being Fired: Who will Run the Hospitals? The Genocide of American Seniors Continues: 8 Dead in Fully-Vaccinated Connecticut Nursing Home Parents in NY Take to the Streets to Warn Ignorant Parents Injecting Their Children with Pfizer Shots as Injuries Among 5 to 11 Year Olds Now Being Reported Parents Sacrifice Hundreds of Thousands of Children Ages 5 to 11 to the COVID-19 Vaccine Gods This Weekend Cardiologist Medical Doctor who Wanted to Punch Anti-Vaxxers in the Face DEAD After COVID Booster Shot Texas Church Injects Young Children with COVID Shot in Halloween Celebration – Christian Churches Now Working with the CDC to Abuse and Murder Children Grieving Mother Who Threatened Health Impact News for Publishing Daughter’s Death following COVID-19 Shot Now Goes Public Do You Have Blood on Your Hands? Tens of Thousands of Children Age 5 to 11 Injected with Gene Therapy Shots 41 Year Old Florida Man Who Cursed Anti-Vaxxers Found Dead in His Home by Neighbors After Second COVID-19 Pfizer Shot 12-Year-Old In Germany Dies 2 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 12-Year-Old in Thailand In ICU After Heart Problems Caused By The Pfizer Shot Whistleblower Reveals Fraud in Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials as 5 to 11-Year-Olds Begin to be Injected – Vaccine Deaths and Injuries to Follow Doctors and COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Testify in Washington D.C. to Crimes Against Humanity – CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci are No Shows UK Stats Show 82% of COVID-19 Deaths and 66% of Hospitalizations were Among Fully Vaccinated for Past Month Fully Vaccinated are Suffering Far Higher Rates of Infection than the Unvaccinated, and It is Getting Worse White House To “Quickly” Vaccinate 28 Million Children Age 5-11 as Deaths and Injuries Continue to Increase among 12 to 19-Year-Olds Who Received a COVID-19 Shot Evidence Clearly Shows Deaths are Increasing Worldwide After COVID-19 Shots – Major Labor Shortages Loom As Deaths and Injuries to Teens Increase After COVID-19 Shots Pfizer Asks FDA for Emergency Authorization to Inject 5 to 11-Year-Olds Post COVID-19 Injections: The Dead Don’t Speak, but Those with Crippling Injuries Issue Warnings Denver Policeman Crippled After Mandatory Pfizer Shot – Are Law Enforcement the Key to Resisting Medical Tyranny? 1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots but Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get the Shot Study: COVID-19 Vaccines INCREASE Deaths and Hospitalizations from COVID-19 Based on Analysis of Most-Vaccinated Countries Whistleblower Lawsuit! Government Medicare Data Shows 48,465 DEAD Following COVID Shots – Remdesivir Drug has 25% Death Rate! Mockers of Anti-Vaxxers Continue to Die After Taking a COVID-19 Injection STUDY: Government’s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines Local Detroit TV Asks for Stories of Unvaxxed Dying from COVID – Gets over 180K Responses of Vaccine Injured and Dead Instead Teens 50X More Likely to Have Heart Disease After COVID Shots than All Other FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 Combined – CDC Admits True but Still Recommends It Besides Fetal Deaths, Breastfeeding Babies are Dying and becoming Sick following Mothers’ COVID Shots Military Members are Dying and Suffering Crippling Effects from COVID Vaccinations CDC: Teens Injected with COVID Shots have 7.5 X More Deaths, 15 X More Disabilities, 44 X More Hospitalizations than All FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 This is probably the key to everything. For the Vaxxed, for the Unvaxxed. Here is an explanation of the natural and synthetic parasites we are facing, and a guide to the three things you need to do to protect yourself and your family. I do not believe the vaccine is an irreversible step. NOTES: mRNA is too expensive to make. In 2018 a mRNA treatment cost $1 million and now only 2-3 years later they have it for billions of people for only $30 per dose? She says it doesn't make sense. She shows a short German video about Cancer as a parasitical infection. Questions Dr Lee Merritt asked herself: Why are cancers bursting out after the vax? Why does autoimmune disease respond to anti parasitical? Why do THEY (Fauci & others) hate antiparasiticals? Why can't we find mRNA's in these vaxxines? 18 labs around the country can NOT find mRNA's inside the vaxxines. Parasites & cancer under the microscope look identical. Shows Karen Kingstons work where they couldn't make a biological bioweapon work so used a synthetic nanoparticle smart hydrogel which IS the real spike protein. With this stuff in the body and 5G turned on it binds with the ACE-2 pathway and people get sick. Dose the population & control disease outbreak with external wavelength (5G). The best thing we can do right now is take the antiparasiticals. Mother parasite laying eggs. She gives off a hormone that keep the eggs unhatched but if she dies the eggs hatch. Specific time cycles to do the 3 day cycles. (28 minute mark) Start with a SHORT CYCLE of 3 days on & 5 days off. Gradually lengthen your cycle (Watch for a reaction). 2 months minimum. Once you can get to 3 days on & one month off you are on MAINTENANCE. In summary, parasites are at the heart of this. She like Chlorine Dioxide but if you tell anyone to take it you could go to jail. Check out her site THE MEDICAL REBEL as she has a simple guide on Chlorine Dioxide. https://drleemerritt.com/ Use at least 2 drugs for the cycles. Dr Lee Merritt uses NITAZOXANIDE & FENBENDAZOLE. NITAZOXANIDE (Alinia) 500mg twice daily for 3 days. Gut parasites (It takes out hydra (A fresh water parasite). Super duper stuff that gets rid of 85% tape worms in 3 days. FENBENDAZOLE (Panacur C) cycle- Gets into the brain & cysts)- 750mg daily for 3 days. CHLOROQUINE HYDROXYCLORIQUINE IVERMECTIN CHLORINE DIOXIDE. Source: The Medical Rebel rumble channel

For Greater Good 30 Day Gun Ban Nobody Is Safe From New Mexico Governor Suspends The Bill Of Right To Carry Firearms In Public In Albuquerque People's Republic Of The Tyrannical Government. Governor announces statewide enforcement plan for gun violence, fentanyl reduction – Plan includes 30-day suspension of concealed, open carry in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County Today. Second Amendment Is Now Suspension New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) Signed An Emergency 30 Day Order To Hell With Your Rights Now. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. SANTA FE – Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham announced on Friday a new public health order that outlines immediate actions aimed at quickly reducing gun violence and illegal drug use in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County. The recent shooting deaths of a thirteen-year-old girl on July 28, a five-year-old girl on August 14, and an eleven-year-old boy on September 6, as well as two mass shootings this year spurred the governor to declare gun violence a public health emergency on Thursday. Today’s public health order includes directives to curb the gun violence and drug abuse that the Governor has declared to be public health emergencies. “As I said yesterday, the time for standard measures has passed,” said Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. “And when New Mexicans are afraid to be in crowds, to take their kids to school, to leave a baseball game – when their very right to exist is threatened by the prospect of violence at every turn – something is very wrong.” During a substantive and earnest conversation on Friday with public safety officials including District Attorney Sam Bregman, Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen, Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina, former State Police Chief Pete Kassetas, and state law enforcement leadership, the governor expanded on her plans to drastically reduce the number of violent incidents and fentanyl-related deaths in New Mexico. The governor also on Friday signed an executive order declaring illegal drugs a public health emergency. The action plan includes a suspension of open and concealed carry laws in Bernalillo County, temporarily prohibiting the carrying of guns on public property with certain exceptions. Exceptions include for licensed security guards and law enforcement officers. Citizens with permits to carry firearms are free to possess their weapons on private property (such as at a gun range or gun store), provided they transport the firearm in a locked box, use a trigger lock, or some other mechanism that renders the gun incapable of being fired. The public health order also directs: – The Regulation and Licensing Division to conduct monthly inspections of licensed firearm dealers to ensure compliance with all sales and storage laws. – The Department of Health, along with the Environment Department, to begin wastewater testing for illegal substances such as fentanyl at schools. – The Department of Health to compile and issue a comprehensive report on gunshot victims presenting at hospitals in New Mexico, which shall include (if available): demographic data of gunshot victims, including age, gender, race, and ethnicity; data on gunshot victim’s healthcare outcomes; the brand and caliber of the firearm used; the general circumstances leading to the injury; the impact of gunshot victims on New Mexico’s healthcare system; and any other pertinent information. – A prohibition on firearms on state property, including state buildings and schools. This also includes other places of education where children gather, such as parks. – The State Police to add officers in Albuquerque with funding for overtime provided. – The Children, Youth and Families Department to immediately suspend the Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative and evaluate juvenile probation protocols. The orders signed go into effect immediately. With few exceptions for human trafficking and pedophile and gangs and sex and drug cartels and any and all criminal organization. All State law requires people to meet certain criteria before they can carry, possess, or dispose of a firearm. These qualifying factors include the following: Be a citizen of the United States. Be at least 21 years old, except for honorably discharged individuals from either the New York National Guard or the United States Military. Be of good moral character. Never had a guardian appointed based on incapacity, mental illness, subnormal intelligence, or other condition or disease. Never had a handgun license revoked. Never civilly confined in a secure treatment facility. Never convinced in all state or anywhere else of a felony or “serious offense.” The definition of “serious offense” includes acts like aiding in an escape from prison, child endangerment, disorderly conduct, illegally using a dangerous weapon, making burglar instruments, rape, receiving stolen property, sodomy, and unlawfully entering a building. Never discharged from the military under dishonorable conditions. Never involuntarily committed to a facility under the Department of Mental Hygiene’s jurisdiction. Not be a fugitive from justice. Not be an addicted or unlawful user of any controlled substance. Not have a domestic violence restraining order filed against you. Not illegally in the United States or admitted into the United States under a non-immigrant visa. Not present any other “good cause” for denial of the license. These are some of the most common reasons why people in New York are denied gun permits. Also, you will likely be required to complete a gun safety class before obtaining a firearm permit. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You! Every day, on average, 316 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides and suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, and police intervention. Every day, 106 people die from gun violence. 39 are murdered - 64 kill themselves - 1 is killed unintentionally - 1 dies but the intent is unknown - 115,551 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides & suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, or by police intervention. Every day, 210 people are shot and survive. - 95 are injured in an attack - 10 survive a suicide attempt - 90 are shot unintentionally - 4 are shot in a legal intervention 38,826 people die from gun violence. - 14,062 murdered - 23,437 die from suicide - 483 killed unintentionally - 521 killed by legal intervention - 324 die but intent was unknown 76,725 people survive gun injuries. - 34,566 injured in an attack - 3,554 survive a suicide attempt - 32,759 shot unintentionally - 1,376 people are shot by legal intervention Every year, 7,957 children and teens are shot in the United States. Among those: - 1,663 children and teens die from gun violence. - 864 are murdered - 6,294 children and teens survive gunshot injuries - 2,788 are intentionally shot by someone else and survive - 662 die from gun suicide - 166 survive an attempted gun suicide - 10 are killed by legal intervention - 101 are shot by legal intervention and survive - 89 are killed unintentionally Gun violence disproportionately impacts Black and Latin X Communities. - Every year, on average, 9,991 Black Americans die by gun violence. Of those: - 8,251 die from gun homicide - 1,447 die from gun suicide. - Black Americans compose 59% of victims of gun homicide but only 14% of the US population. Black Americans experience 8 times as many gun homicides as white Americans. And Black children and teens (ages 1-17) are three times more likely to be killed with a gun than their white peers. Every year, on average, 3,800 Latinos die due to gun violence - 2,508 are homicides - 1,102 are suicides - 114 are undetermined intent or legal intervention - 76 are unintentional shootings Every year, an average of 10,300 hate crimes involve firearms. - 28 hate crimes involve a firearm each day. Nearly a fifth of hate crimes are based on sexual identity and gender identity bias. LGBTQ+ are more likely to be targeted for a hate crime more than any other group. - 90% of suicides attempts with a gun are fatal. - LGBTQ+ youth are more likely to die by suicide than non-LGBTQ youth, implying that firearm suicides could have a disproportionate impact on transgender and adolescent members of the LGBTQ+ community. The first semi-automatic rifle was introduced in 1885, the first semi-automatic pistol in 1892, and the first semi-automatic shotgun in 1902. Semi-automatics account for about 20 percent of the 300 million privately-owned firearms in the United States and the percentage is quickly rising, because semi-automatics now account for about 50 percent of all new firearms bought annually. A semi-automatic rifle or semi-automatic pistol is an autoloading rifle or semi-automatic pistol that fires a single cartridge with each pull of the trigger, and uses part of the fired cartridge's energy to eject the case and load another cartridge into the chamber. For comparison, a single shot, derringer pistol and a bolt-action rifle requires the user to cycle the bolt manually before they can fire a second time, and a fully automatic rifle or pistol fires continuously until the trigger is released. This is called a Fully Automatic Sub Machine Guns. What’s the Difference ? Machine Gun vs. Submachine Gun... Submachine guns use handgun ammunition. Machine guns use rifle ammunition. If a gun-toting character pulls the trigger and holds it there while the business end goes bang-bang-bang, then there's an excellent chance that firearm is a submachine gun or a machine gun. So AR-15 and AK-47 Etc. Are Not Assault Weapon At ALL... Yes I Repeat Are Not Assault Weapon... So AR-15 and AK-47 & Other Guns Are and Fire Semi-Automatic Only The Same For 140 Years! Here’s a quick cheat sheet to avoid some easy pitfalls with this terminology. AR-15: Nope, the AR-15 isn’t a submachine gun or a machine gun. It’s not even an assault rifle. Read more about AR-15s here. Assault Rifle: Many, but not all, machine guns (not submachine guns) are assault rifles. If it meets the criteria in this post, then you’re good to go. Assault Weapon: Don’t use this term. At best, it’s vague. At worst, it introduces something politically loaded for no good reason. Read up on assault weapons in this post. Fully Automatic Pistol/Fully Automatic Handgun/Fully Automatic Rifle: Even though they’re technically correct, I’ve not heard of “fully automatic pistol” or “fully automatic handgun” being used all that often. “Submachine gun” or “machine pistol” are the better bets. “Fully automatic rifle,” on the other hand, is a solid substitute for “machine gun.” Machine Rifle: It’s tempting to use this term given machine guns use rifle ammunition, but writing in a “machine rifle” will probably win you a doofus award. Don’t be a doofus. Just write “machine gun.” Referring to a “Submachine Gun” as a “Machine Gun” Upon Second Reference: I think this works. If a character is using a submachine gun on the first reference, and you call it a “machine gun” on the second reference as an abbreviated form, that’s kosher. Just don’t call it a corn dog. It’s not a corn dog. Sub-Machine Gun vs. Submachine Gun: Pick one style and stick with it. I think “sub-machine gun” looks funky, and not in the good way like when I dance at wedding receptions. “Submachine gun” is the better of the two. Submachine Pistol: Even though they fire handgun ammunition, substituting in “submachine pistol” for “submachine gun” is just too weird for this planet (and your fiction). However, “machine pistol” is a thing, and is covered a little later in this post. Tactical Rifle: A good, but probably not great, catch-all for any military-esque, shouldered firearm. If you’re going for a generic depiction, pick submachine gun or machine gun and stick to it. Synonym for Gun A weapon is anything that is designed to, or is used to, cause damage to a person or animal. Gun is a category of weapons that have barrels and accelerate a projectile of some kind with an explosive. Also called firearms. Some weapons with similar forms are also called guns even though they do not use an explosive or a projectile. FISA-DOJ-CIA-FBI-NSA-DEA-MK-Ultra: Secret Motivation and Government Killing and Rape and Body Count for Top Government Misc. Jobs Initiations. Dirty Tricks Cops Use And Why They Use Them - This info. below describes some of the illegal tactics and questionable techniques police officers use to increase the chances of obtaining a conviction or to administer punishment to persons they perceive as having committed a crime. Police officers are outnumbered and restricted by legal mandates in their efforts to counter street-smart gangsters who can often afford highly skilled defense attorneys. Police officers often rationalize that they need an additional "edge" in their fight against crime. Thus, at times they break the rules and use illegal methods to obtain and increase evidence against a suspect they believe to be guilty of a crime. the use of "speed traps," the handling of suspects, search and seizure, the use of civil asset forfeiture and informers, the obtaining of confessions, the use of "alibi guns" when police kill a suspect, methods of obtaining evidence, the manipulation of evidence, entrapment, and proactive law enforcement. Some of the incidents described are the police planting of drugs on a private plane so it can be seized for police department use; the spraying of mace on a suspect's car seat, so that after a few minutes of driving he experiences excruciating pain on his crotch and buttocks; the use of a blank tape at an illegal interrogation, adding the reading of rights to the suspect later; the use of stun guns to torture suspects without leaving marks; vigilante cops conducting an "execution;" police instigation of gang wars to thin out gang members; and the adding of drugs to evidence so as to increase the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. Other police practices discussed are the use of illegal wiretaps; the use of snitches; getting search warrants without probable cause; and keeping confiscated drugs, guns, and cash to pay for "Dirty FISA-DOJ-CIA-FBI-NSA-DEA Business. we tackle the pressing issue of judicial corruption in the U.S. justice system—a system that isn't as ideal as we may think. Discover the shocking "kids for cash" scandal, financial ties between judges and companies, and statistics revealing widespread perceptions of corruption. Join us as we delve into cases of biased rulings, challenges in prosecuting corrupt judges, and systemic loopholes that enable misconduct. We explore the complexities of judicial oversight and the need for accountability in the quest for justice. No matter how strict you make gun laws sick people and drug out persons or normal people and others etc. (all races and all colours of people) a criminal is a criminal and will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. On average in the United States, more than 110 people are killed from guns and more than 200 are shot and wounded each day. Additionally, 19 mass shootings take place in the U.S. each year from 2009 to 2020, with 947 wounded by gunfire and 1,363 fatally shot. In this video, we're going to take a look at the The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings Now. The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold Without Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2022 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying sex worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2022 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 1000s sex/drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! In the United States, a red flag law is a gun violence prevention law that permits a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who they believe may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. It’s impossible to separate the traffic in humans, the traffic in drugs and guns, and the ambitions. They are all part of the same picture. any criminal organization with the intention of supplying drug trafficking operations. Good Luck With This One ? Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html With few exceptions for human trafficking and pedophile and gangs and sex and drug cartels and any and all criminal organization. All State law requires people to meet certain criteria before they can carry, possess, or dispose of a firearm. These qualifying factors include the following: Be a citizen of the United States. Be at least 21 years old, except for honorably discharged individuals from either the New York National Guard or the United States Military. Be of good moral character. Never had a guardian appointed based on incapacity, mental illness, subnormal intelligence, or other condition or disease. Never had a handgun license revoked. Never civilly confined in a secure treatment facility. Never convinced in all state or anywhere else of a felony or “serious offense.” The definition of “serious offense” includes acts like aiding in an escape from prison, child endangerment, disorderly conduct, illegally using a dangerous weapon, making burglar instruments, rape, receiving stolen property, sodomy, and unlawfully entering a building. Never discharged from the military under dishonorable conditions. Never involuntarily committed to a facility under the Department of Mental Hygiene’s jurisdiction. Not be a fugitive from justice. Not be an addicted or unlawful user of any controlled substance. Not have a domestic violence restraining order filed against you. Not illegally in the United States or admitted into the United States under a non-immigrant visa. Not present any other “good cause” for denial of the license. These are some of the most common reasons why people in New York are denied gun permits. Also, you will likely be required to complete a gun safety class before obtaining a firearm permit. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. https://rumble.com/v2etrk0-history-of-deadliest-prison-and-street-gangs-united-states-and-your-gun-rig.html https://rumble.com/v2eeblc-outrageous-police-killings-misconduct-police-brutality-and-public-trust-is-.html https://rumble.com/v2dnjoy-vietnam-requiem-and-horrors-of-war-and-killing-of-100s-millions-battle-grou.html https://rumble.com/v2cvtp6-questions-attorney-general-eric-holder-on-key-players-involved-fast-and-fur.html https://rumble.com/v2cuu12-76-million-gun-owners-gun-culture-and-2nd-amendment-laws-red-flags-u.s.-gan.html https://rumble.com/v2ck7r4-10-times-america-helped-overthrow-a-foreign-government-and-our-sovereign-na.html https://rumble.com/v2cfl0c-what-is-martial-law-in-the-us-habeas-corpus-insurrection-act-of-1807-nwo-.html https://rumble.com/v297zz4-the-great-dictator-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you.html https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html https://rumble.com/v28z52a-agent-killed-in-fast-and-furious-gun-operation-and-1000-more-now-dead-2022.html https://rumble.com/v28yen6-85-billion-worth-of-us-equipment-adds-to-world-terrorist-military-muscle-gr.html https://rumble.com/v27t6qc-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html One of the most hotly debated parts of the Constitution, the Second Amendment is a single sentence that leaves a lot open to interpretation. Passed in 1789 along with nine other amendments known as the Bill of Rights, it prevents the government from infringing on “well regulated Militias.” What this means, is up for debate. The Supreme Court released very few groundbreaking opinions on the topic until 2008 when they found the Second Amendment does in fact protect an individual right to bear arms. Constitutional rights are essential - but they aren't always easy to protect. If you believe a government entity has infringed on your Second Amendment rights, contact an experienced civil rights attorney to learn about your options. To learn more about gun control laws in your state, visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law. What the Second Amendment Says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Frequently Asked Questions What was the original intent of the Second Amendment? Many historians agree that the primary reason for passing the Second Amendment was to prevent the need for the United States to have a professional standing army. At the time it was passed, it seems it was not intended to grant a right for private individuals to keep weapons for self-defense. What does the right to bear arms really mean? The right to bear arms generally refers to a person’s right to possess weapons. Over the years, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution’s right to bear arms as an individual self-defense right, making it very difficult for Congress to regulate guns. What is a Second Amendment sanctuary? Second Amendment sanctuaries are cities, towns, and counties that resist state and federal gun laws. They adopt formal resolutions either declaring support for Second Amendment rights or withhold support for the enforcement of gun laws. In most cases, this means the local government will not enforce gun laws they don't agree with - such as bans on bump stocks, assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines. However, many legal experts say sanctuary resolutions have no legal authority, and challenges in the courts are likely to follow. United States Library of Congress, The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation For over 200 years, despite extensive debate and much legislative action with respect to regulation of the purchase, possession, and transportation of firearms, as well as proposals to substantially curtail ownership of firearms, there was no definitive resolution by the courts of just what right the Second Amendment protects. The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State) and its operative clause (the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed). To perhaps oversimplify the opposing arguments, the states’ rights thesis emphasized the importance of the prefatory clause, arguing that the purpose of the clause was to protect the states in their authority to maintain formal, organized militia units. The individual rights thesis emphasized the operative clause, so that individuals would be protected in the ownership, possession, and transportation of firearms. Whatever the Amendment meant, it was seen as a bar only to federal action, not state or private restraints. No matter how strict you make gun laws sick people and drug out persons or normal people and others etc. (all races and all colours of people) a criminal is a criminal and will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. On average in the United States, more than 110 people are killed from guns and more than 200 are shot and wounded each day. Additionally, 19 mass shootings take place in the U.S. each year from 2009 to 2020, with 947 wounded by gunfire and 1,363 fatally shot. In this video, we're going to take a look at the The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings Now. The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold Without Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2022 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying sex worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2022 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 1000s sex/drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! In the United States, a red flag law is a gun violence prevention law that permits a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who they believe may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. It’s impossible to separate the traffic in humans, the traffic in drugs and guns, and the ambitions. They are all part of the same picture. any criminal organization with the intention of supplying drug trafficking operations. Good Luck With This One ? Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html With few exceptions for human trafficking and pedophile and gangs and sex and drug cartels and any and all criminal organization. All State law requires people to meet certain criteria before they can carry, possess, or dispose of a firearm. These qualifying factors include the following: Be a citizen of the United States. Be at least 21 years old, except for honorably discharged individuals from either the New York National Guard or the United States Military. Be of good moral character. Never had a guardian appointed based on incapacity, mental illness, subnormal intelligence, or other condition or disease. Never had a handgun license revoked. Never civilly confined in a secure treatment facility. Never convinced in all state or anywhere else of a felony or “serious offense.” The definition of “serious offense” includes acts like aiding in an escape from prison, child endangerment, disorderly conduct, illegally using a dangerous weapon, making burglar instruments, rape, receiving stolen property, sodomy, and unlawfully entering a building. Never discharged from the military under dishonorable conditions. Never involuntarily committed to a facility under the Department of Mental Hygiene’s jurisdiction. Not be a fugitive from justice. Not be an addicted or unlawful user of any controlled substance. Not have a domestic violence restraining order filed against you. Not illegally in the United States or admitted into the United States under a non-immigrant visa. Not present any other “good cause” for denial of the license. These are some of the most common reasons why people in New York are denied gun permits. Also, you will likely be required to complete a gun safety class before obtaining a firearm permit. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You! Every day, on average, 316 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides and suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, and police intervention. Every day, 106 people die from gun violence. 39 are murdered - 64 kill themselves - 1 is killed unintentionally - 1 dies but the intent is unknown - 115,551 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides & suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, or by police intervention. Every day, 210 people are shot and survive. - 95 are injured in an attack - 10 survive a suicide attempt - 90 are shot unintentionally - 4 are shot in a legal intervention 38,826 people die from gun violence. - 14,062 murdered - 23,437 die from suicide - 483 killed unintentionally - 521 killed by legal intervention - 324 die but intent was unknown 76,725 people survive gun injuries. - 34,566 injured in an attack - 3,554 survive a suicide attempt - 32,759 shot unintentionally - 1,376 people are shot by legal intervention Every year, 7,957 children and teens are shot in the United States. Among those: - 1,663 children and teens die from gun violence. - 864 are murdered - 6,294 children and teens survive gunshot injuries - 2,788 are intentionally shot by someone else and survive - 662 die from gun suicide - 166 survive an attempted gun suicide - 10 are killed by legal intervention - 101 are shot by legal intervention and survive - 89 are killed unintentionally Gun violence disproportionately impacts Black and Latin X Communities. - Every year, on average, 9,991 Black Americans die by gun violence. Of those: - 8,251 die from gun homicide - 1,447 die from gun suicide. - Black Americans compose 59% of victims of gun homicide but only 14% of the US population. Black Americans experience 8 times as many gun homicides as white Americans. And Black children and teens (ages 1-17) are three times more likely to be killed with a gun than their white peers. Every year, on average, 3,800 Latinos die due to gun violence - 2,508 are homicides - 1,102 are suicides - 114 are undetermined intent or legal intervention - 76 are unintentional shootings Every year, an average of 10,300 hate crimes involve firearms. - 28 hate crimes involve a firearm each day. ASSAULT RIFLE BAN AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES https://rumble.com/v2kzj20-assault-rifle-ban-and-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-funny-.html The AR-15/M-16 Is a regular rifle. Is it because it’s black and scary looking? Is it because it’s a semi-automatic? Is it because the leftist media says so. What’s the difference between these two rifles. The top is the AR-15/M-16. The one under it is the Ruger Mini-14/ Etc.# Guns. One is black, the other has a normal looking wooden stock. Guess what? They both shoot the same 5.56x45/.223 cartridge. They are both semi-automatic. both will fire as fast as you can pull the trigger. So, if you’re afraid of the AR-15 because it’s black and scary looking, it’s time you grew up and act like an adult. If it’s because the leftist media says so, then it’s time you start thinking for yourself. The AR-15/M-16 has the same sporting purpose as the Mini-14 / Other Guns. Hell, it has the same home defenses or sporting purpose as any rifle. The first semi-automatic rifle was introduced 138 years ago in 1885, the first semi-automatic pistol in 1892, and the first semi-automatic shotgun in 1902. Semi-automatics account for about 20 percent of the 300 million privately-owned firearms in the United States and the percentage is quickly rising, because semi-automatics now account for about 50 percent of all new firearms bought annually. As we have discussed on Penn-Lago Pennsylvanians are afforded heavy protections by our State constitution, which states in Article 1 Section 21 that “the right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.” While not an unlimited right (arguably none of our rights are unlimited) it still provides serious protection compared to some of our surrounding States and other States in the Northeast. Following the Sandy Hook shooting of 2012 the State legislature in New York took it upon themselves to enact the NY SAFE (Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement) Act, which bans possession of “high capacity” magazines, or magazines with a capacity of over 10 rounds (originally 7). In addition, “assault rifles” are identified by the bill as weapons that accept detachable magazines and possess one or more of the following features: pistol grip, barrel shroud, telescoping or folding stock, thumbhole stock, bayonet mount, flash suppressor or muzzle break, a threaded barrel, a grenade launcher, shotguns that can accept detachable magazines, fixed magazines that hold in excess of 7 (now 10) rounds. Similarly, Connecticut passed a law restricting “assault rifles” which they define as selective fire weapons, or weapons placed on a limited (and somewhat arbitrary) list of semiautomatic AR, AK, and SKS variants. Magazines with capacities over 10 rounds are restricted, although ones owned prior to April 4, 2013 are grandfathered in as long as they are registered. Both Connecticut and New York’s laws were sued upon and eventually decided in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit court decided that although AR-15 style rifles are “commonly owned” because the answer to whether such weapons are “dangerous and unusual” was “elusive,” the right could be infringed upon. In short, the court said that while owning AR-15 style weapons is protected by the Second Amendment, the government could infringe upon that right if they have a “legitimate interest,” such as saving lives. In finding, the court said that AR-15 style weapons are “disproportionally used in crime, and particularly in mass shootings like the attack in Newtown.” The court used language borrowed from the court in Heller v. D.C. and the 1939 decision in U.S. v. Miller which suggested that the guidelines on what weapons could be lawfully owned under the Second Amendment should be based upon what weapons are in common use. Under this guidance weapons fitting under the title of “assault rifles” for purposes of the ban are protected as some of the most popular weapons sold in America. In fact, by some estimations sales of AR and AK style weapons each year outpace the sale of F150 pickup trucks in America. Even by the estimations the Second Circuit court used AR style weapons account for 2.5 % of all weapons owned in America, or roughly the same percentage of Toyota Prius’ on the road as compared to the total number of cars on the road, which the court decided was sufficient to establish common use. However, the recognized 2nd amendment right was not afforded strict scrutiny, which would have required that the New York and Connecticut laws which impact a constitutional right must serve a compelling state interest, and be narrowly tailored and necessary to serve that interest. Almost every other constitutionally enumerated right is tested using the strict scrutiny test in the courts. Instead, the Second Circuit decided that although the answer was elusive to the question whether AR style weapons are “dangerous and unusual,” they could still be banned as a way to prevent gun violence. The court used intermediate scrutiny in this determination (the proposed law is “substantially related” instead of “necessary” to the State interest at issue). It is unlikely this law would have passed a strict scrutiny test, as it seems to broad, and lacks the evidence needed to show that the law would be necessary to meet the State interest in minimizing firearm related deaths. After the Second Circuit decision, the firearm owners group who sued, the Connecticut Citizens Defense League (CCDL) appealed the decision. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court denied certiorari and said that they would not hear the case, thereby letting the Second Circuit decision upholding the law stand. While we do not know how this would have played out in the Supreme Court after the passing of Justice Scalia, we know that New York and Connecticut residents will remain burdened by the ban for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, even at the federal level “assault weapon” bans are not unheard of, and the federal government in fact banned such weapons between 1994, and 2004, when the ban expired. Congress chose not to renew the ban after its expiration. The overall constitutionality of individual states instituting such bans is still undecided, as the Supreme Court has not yet heard a case on the issue. District Courts remain somewhat split on the matter, or at least split on what test to use to properly evaluate assault weapon ban laws. The court of appeals for the Fourth Circuit said that a lower court used the wrong standard of review when they chose not to use the strict scrutiny standard in reviewing a Maryland assault rifle ban. That case has been sent back to the lower court to be reheard using the strict scrutiny standard. While Pennsylvanians remain solidly protected from such State weapons bans by our State constitution, it is wise for responsible gun owners to pay attention to the political landscape, and the potential for the federal government to attempt a renewal of such a ban in the future. States in other districts instituting similar bans can act as test cases for how a national ban may play out. Even for gun owners that do not own weapons that fit in the “assault weapons” category, remaining vigilant of our rights is important to prevent sliding further on what can be a slippery slope. Pay attention to coming court decisions, and remember to vote! 10 Of The Most Lethal Gangs In America - So Its Very Easy To Do - Walk Up To Any Gang Member And Say (Ha Ha Ha) Pleases Give Me Your Banned Guns ? ? Human stupidity is infinite– we all do dumb things from time to time that are quite facepalm-worthy. But some folks take the dumbness to another level and cause problems to themselves or others. A stupid person doesn’t have much intelligence or imagination, and they go through life making decisions that seem to lack all common sense. If you’ve got a brain but you don’t use it, you might be a bit stupid. The word comes from a Latin adjective that means “amazed or stunned,” and stupid people are stunned by everything because their minds are numb. You can make a stupid mistake when you’re not thinking, and you can call someone stupid if you’re feeling cruel, like “Hey, Stupid.” Zombies are stupid because their brains are dead. If that makes sense to you, then you’re not stupid, and you’re also not a zombie. Well done! Gang violence in the United States is a huge problem. A handful of violent gangs with internecine and brutal networks are responsible for thousands of deaths of both innocents and other gang members. Gang violence in the United States is a huge problem. A handful of violent gangs with internecine and brutal networks are responsible for thousands of deaths of both innocents and other gang members every year. It’s no longer a problem that local law enforcement agencies can handle – it’s much bigger than that and the Feds have known this for years. Here are a 10 of the most lethal gangs that the FBI is constantly vigilant of. MS 13: The gang known as Mara Salvatrucha or MS 13 is known to have about 10,000 members and it’s one of the most dangerous and violent gangs in operation today. They are operational in over 40 cities around the United States. This gang was founded in the Salvadoran immigrant community of Los Angeles in the 1980s, but their illicit operations stretch deep into north, east and southern states of the country. They specialize in all types of illegal behavior: drug trafficking, murder, extortion, racketeering and even child prostitution. The gang has even become a major force back in their native country of El Salvador because of the large amounts of gang members that have been deported back to their country. Their reach even influences the ruling political parties of El Salvador. In 2012, the Obama administration officially declared MS-13 to be an “International Criminal Organization.” Barrio 18: The 18th Street Gang goes by other nicknames like the “Barrio 18” or the “M-18” and it is a huge youth gang in the United States, Central American and even Canada. The FBI has been waging a major war on this gang since the 1990s in an attempt to root out their influence in all kinds of illegal activity: drug sales, murder-for-hire, prostitution, extortion and kidnapping. Most of their members tend to be of Mexican descent, but in recent years, they have become open to other nationalities as well. The Barrio 18 gang considers the MS 13 to be its arch rival and disputes between these two collectives have resulted in several gang murders over the years. Currently, the membership of this gang across the United States numbers in the tens of thousands and the FBI knows it always needs to keep several eyes on this group. Aryan Brotherhood: Unlike other gangs mentioned in this piece, the Aryan Brotherhood organization is a gang that has a major stronghold in the federal penitentiary system of the United States. According to the FBI, the gang’s members make up less than 0.1% of the prison population, but they account for 20% of all the murders that happen in jails across the United States. The Brotherhood is also known as The Brand or AB or One-Two has been in operation since the 1960s, and while they origins may have had central themes in common with Nazism, it has evolved into a true criminal syndicate. The AB is particularly scary; one inflexible rule for joining the gang is killing a Black or Hispanic prisoner. Also, once you’re in, you can never leave. The membership of this collective is about 10,000 both in and out of prison, and once you’re part of them, there is no leaving – you are “brotherhood” for life. Actually, last year, the brazen murder of two Texas prosecutors was considered to be the work of the AB. This is certainly one scary bunch. Mongols MC: We might watch shows like the hugely popular Sons of Anarchy on cable and think that these actors are portraying something so farfetched, but the truth is, it’s closer to reality than you might think. An example of a real life motorcycle gang that parallels the SAMCRO version on television is The Mongols Motorcycle Club which was formed in the 1970s in California. They are named of course after Genghis Khan’s ruthless Mongol empire and they are believed to have over 70 chapters spread throughout the nation. They specialize in the distribution and transportation of drugs, money laundering, extortion and armed assaults. They are not on the best of terms with the Hell’s Angels but they do have a good criminal cohort relationship with other motorcycle clubs like the Outlaws, Bandidos and Sons of Silence. Chicago’s Splinter Gangs: If you’ve been keeping up with the news lately, you know that the rate of gang violence in Chicago is hopelessly spiraling out of control. Even the hard-nosed mayor Rahm Emmanuel can’t seem to get a handle on the crisis. In 2012, there were 503 murders and in 2013, there were 415 murders. A huge part of this problem has to deal with the gang problem in the city – most specifically on the gritty south side of the city. In the 70s and 80s, bigger and more structured gangs like the Gangster Disciples, The Hit Squad and The Killa Ward were in control. But the Chicago PD did a major sweep and imprisoned a lot of these gang leaders. This has resulted in a more dangerous system of unsupervised splinter cliques with limited turf and no rules of operation. The scariest thing is what with these smaller gangs, there are still as many weapons on the street and the shooters are mostly young 14-year-olds. It’s truly a deplorable state of affairs. The Bloods: The notorious Bloods gang started off in the 1960s in Angeles, and eventually spread to several prisons in Texas in the 1980s. Ever since its inception, the Bloods gang (whose color is red) has had an arch rival in the form of the Crips (whose turf color is blue). The East Coast Bloods started in NYC a couple of decades later and has become an influential criminal enterprise in its own right. Actually just last year, a judge in Manhattan sentenced Omar Portee, one of the founders of the East Coast Bloods to 50 years in jail. In that trial, prosecutors proved that the East Coast Bloods gang was the largest, violent street gang in New York City and that it shared similar criminal and violence ideologies with the West Coast gang of the same name. The Mexican Mafia: The Mexican Mafia is a gang that has deep roots in the penitentiary system of America. It traces its origins back to the 1950’s and back then it was largely centered in the California Department of Corrections. It also goes by other names like EME or Emeros. Before members can join the MM they have to pass loyalty tests and these include cruel and criminal acts like beatings, thefts or even murder. The MM is also known to maintain a strong code of intra-gang ethics. For example in 1997, after a botched robbery by two gang members in Texas, the two culprits were quickly executed. One of them was found choked, stabbed and run over by a car and the other was found stabbed to death. The Mexican mafia is active in all kinds of illegal activities: drugs, racketeering, paid hits, fraud and have operations in several states including Florida, California, Arizona and Texas. Rollin’ 60 Crips: The Rollin’ 60 Neighborhood Crips is one of the major gangs operating out of Los Angeles. This gang is a splinter group of the notorious Westside Crips, and their formation goes back to the late 1970s. As far as their membership, it is believed that they have more than 2,000 members mostly recruited from the Westchester and Crenshaw neighborhoods of Los Angeles. With regards to criminal activities they partake in, the 60s are known for their involvement in bank-robberies, car-jackings, deadly weapon assaults, home invasions and even rapes. They have also been known to get into blood feuds with rival gangs like Inglewood Family Gangster Bloods and the Neighborhood Pirus. Barrio Azteca: This is another gang that is certainly of major concern to local and even international law enforcement organizations. Barrio Azteca or Los Azteca is a violent street gang with several thousand members operating out of southern states like New Mexico and Texas and even East Coast states like Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. The members of this gang even wield influence in Juarez, Mexico – where they have another 5,000 or more members. The reason this gang is so dangerous is that they are affiliated with the ruthless Juarez Drug Cartel in Mexico. This cartel has a militant arm called La Linea, and this sub-collective often hires gangsters and thugs from Barrio Azteca to do their dirty work. The gang is has been implicated in cocaine trafficking, high profile murders and even prison massacres. They are definitely not the crowd you want to be mingling with. Trinitarios: Most of the jail gangs already discussed started in Western and southern states. However Trinitarios is a gang that was formed in New York City. The group is comprised mostly of Dominican immigrants and it officially became active in 1989. This gang is considered as one of the fastest growing in the country – there are members in all the five boroughs of the city and a slew of other states including New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Ohio. This gang is considered to be particularly violent; in 2012, dozens of members of the Bronx chapter were rounded up for their involvement in nine murders and 24 attempted murders. They are also very active in drug trafficking, specializing in marijuana, crack cocaine, powder cocaine and oxycodone. The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution, adopted in 1791. It outlines Americans' rights in relation to their government and guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual, such as freedom of speech, press, and religion. It sets rules for due process of law and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Government to the people or the states. It prohibits serious criminal charges starting by a grand jury, double jeopardy, and property taking without just compensation. People have the right against self-incrimination and cannot be imprisoned without due process of law. The Bill of Rights: A Brief History “[A] bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse.” – Thomas Jefferson, December 20, 1787 In the summer of 1787, delegates from the 13 states convened in Philadelphia and drafted a remarkable blueprint for self-government — the Constitution of the United States. The first draft set up a system of checks and balances that included a strong executive branch, a representative legislature and a federal judiciary. The Constitution was remarkable, but deeply flawed. For one thing, it did not include a specific declaration – or bill – of individual rights. It specified what the government could do but did not say what it could not do. For another, it did not apply to everyone. The “consent of the governed” meant propertied white men only. The absence of a “bill of rights” turned out to be an obstacle to the Constitution’s ratification by the states. It would take four more years of intense debate before the new government’s form would be resolved. The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one. In the end, popular sentiment was decisive. Recently freed from the despotic English monarchy, the American people wanted strong guarantees that the new government would not trample upon their newly won freedoms of speech, press and religion, nor upon their right to be free from warrantless searches and seizures. So, the Constitution’s framers heeded Thomas Jefferson who argued: “A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.” The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution’s first ten amendments became the law of the land. Limitied Government Early American mistrust of government power came from the colonial experience itself. Most historians believe that the pivotal event was the Stamp Act, passed by the English Parliament in 1765. Taxes were imposed on every legal and business document. Newspapers, books and pamphlets were also taxed. Even more than the taxes themselves, the Americans resented the fact that they were imposed by a distant government in which they were not represented. And they were further enraged by the ways in which the Stamp Act was enforced. Armed with “writs of assistance” issued by Parliament, British customs inspectors entered people’s homes even if they had no evidence of a Stamp Act violation, and ransacked the people’s belongings in search of contraband. The colonialists came to hate these “warrantless” searches and they became a rallying point for opposition to British rule. From these experiences came a uniquely American view of power and liberty as natural enemies. The nation’s founders believed that containing the government’s power and protecting liberty was their most important task, and declared a new purpose for government: the protection of individual rights. The protection of rights was not the government’s only purpose. It was still expected to protect the community against foreign and domestic threats, to ensure economic growth, and to conduct foreign affairs. It was not, however, the government’s job to tell people how to live their lives, what religion to believe in, or what to write about in a pamphlet or newspaper. In this sense, the idea of individual rights is the oldest and most traditional of American values. “Certain Unalienable Rights” Democracy and liberty are often thought to be the same thing, but they are not. Democracy means that people ought to be able to vote for public officials in fair elections, and make most political decisions by majority rule. Liberty, on the other hand, means that even in a democracy, individuals have rights that no majority should be able to take away. The rights that the Constitution’s framers wanted to protect from government abuse were referred to in the Declaration of Independence as “unalienable rights.” They were also called “natural” rights, and to James Madison, they were “the great rights of mankind.” Although it is commonly thought that we are entitled to free speech because the First Amendment gives it to us, this country’s original citizens believed that as human beings, they were entitled to free speech, and they invented the First Amendment in order to protect it. The entire Bill of Rights was created to protect rights the original citizens believed were naturally theirs, including: Freedom of Religion The right to exercise one’s own religion, or no religion, free from any government influence or compulsion. Freedom of Speech, Press, Petition, and Assembly Even unpopular expression is protected from government suppression or censorship. Privacy ​The right to be free of unwarranted and unwanted government intrusion into one’s personal and private affairs, papers, and possessions. Due Process of Law ​The right to be treated fairly by the government whenever the loss of liberty or property is at stake. Equality Before the Law ​The right to be treated equally before the law, regardless of social status. ​ ​”An Impenetrable Bulwark” of Liberty The Bill of Rights established soaring principles that guaranteed the most fundamental rights in very general terms. But from the beginning, real live cases arose that raised difficult questions about how, and even if, the Bill of Rights would be applied. Before the paper rights could become actual rights, someone had to interpret what the language of the Bill of Rights meant in specific situations. Who would be the final arbiter of how the Constitution should be applied? At first, the answer was unclear. Thomas Jefferson thought that the federal judiciary should have that power; James Madison agreed that a system of independent courts would be “an impenetrable bulwark” of liberty. But the Constitution did not make this explicit, and the issue would not be resolved until 1803. That year, for the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional in a case called Marbury v. Madison. Although the facts of this case were fairly mundane (a dispute over the Secretary of State’s refusal to commission four judges appointed by the Senate), the principle it established – that the Supreme Court had the power to nullify acts of Congress that violated the Constitution – turned out to be the key to the development and protection of most of the rights Americans enjoy today. According to one eminent legal scholar, the independent judiciary was “America’s most distinctive contribution to constitutionalism.” Cases or Controversies The judicial branch of the new government was different from the legislative and executive branches in one very important respect: the courts did not have the power to initiate action by themselves. Congress could pass laws and the President could issue executive orders, but courts could not review these actions on their own initiative. Courts had to wait until a dispute – a “case or controversy” – broke out between real people who had something to gain or lose by the outcome. And as it turned out, the people whose rights were most vulnerable to governmental abuse had least capacity to sue. Thus, although the power of judicial review was established in 1803, more than a century would pass before the Supreme Court even had many opportunities to protect individual rights. For 130 years after ratification, the most notable thing about the Bill of Rights was its almost total lack of implementation by the courts. By the beginning of the 20th century, racial segregation was legal and pervaded all aspects of American society. Sex discrimination was firmly institutionalized and workers were arrested for labor union activities. Legal immigrants were deported for their political views, the police used physical coercion to extract confessions from criminal suspects, and members of minority religions were victims of persecution. As late as 1920, the U.S. Supreme Court had never once struck down any law or governmental action on First Amendment grounds. The most common constitutional violations went unchallenged because the people whose rights were most often denied were precisely those members of society who were least aware of their rights and least able to afford a lawyer. They had no access to those impenetrable bulwarks of liberty – the courts. The Bill of Rights was like an engine no one knew how to start. In the Public Interest In 1920, a small group of visionaries came together to discuss how to start the engine. Led by Roger Baldwin, a social worker and labor activist, the group included Crystal Eastman, Albert DeSilver, Jane Addams, Felix Frankfurter, Helen Keller and Arthur Garfield Hayes. They formed the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and dedicated themselves to holding the government to the Bill of Rights’ promises. The ACLU, the NAACP, founded in 1909, and labor unions, whose very right to exist had not yet been recognized by the courts, began to challenge constitutional violations in court on behalf of those who had been previously shut out. This was the beginning of what has come to be known as public interest law. They provided the missing ingredient that made our constitutional system and Bill of Rights finally work. Although they had few early victories, these organizations began to create a body of law that made First Amendment freedoms, privacy rights, and the principles of equality and fundamental fairness come alive. Gradually, the Bill of Rights was transformed from a “parchment barrier” to a protective wall that increasingly shielded each individual’s unalienable rights from the reach of government. Enormous progress was made between 1954 and 1973, when many rights long dormant became enforceable. Today, those achievements are being heavily challenged by a movement dedicated to rolling back the reach and effectiveness of the Bill of Rights and to undermining the independence of our courts. The development of the Bill of Rights was a pivotal event in the long story of liberty, but it is a story that is still unfolding. Rights, But Not for Everyone The Bill of Rights seemed to be written in broad language that excluded no one, but in fact, it was not intended to protect all the people – whole groups were left out. Women were second-class citizens, essentially the property of their husbands, unable even to vote until 1920, when the 19th Amendment was passed and ratified. Native Americans were entirely outside the constitutional system, defined as an alien people in their own land. They were governed not by ordinary American laws, but by federal treaties and statutes that stripped tribes of most of their land and much of their autonomy. The Bill of Rights was in force for nearly 135 years before Congress granted Native Americans U.S. citizenship. And it was well understood that there was a “race exception” to the Constitution. Slavery was this country’s original sin. For the first 78 years after it was ratified, the Constitution protected slavery and legalized racial subordination. Instead of constitutional rights, slaves were governed by “slave codes” that controlled every aspect of their lives. They had no access to the rule of law: they could not go to court, make contracts, or own any property. They could be whipped, branded, imprisoned without trial, and hanged. In short, as one infamous Supreme Court opinion declared: “Blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” It would take years of struggle and a bloody civil war before additional amendments to the Constitution were passed, giving slaves and their descendants the full rights of citizenship – at least on paper: The 13th Amendment abolished slavery; The 14th Amendment guatanteed to African Americans the right of due process and equal protection of the law; The 15th Amendment gave them the right to vote; But it would take a century more of struggle before these rights were effectively enforced. The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Second Amendment Is Now Suspension New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) Signed An Emergency 30 Day Order To Hell With Your Rights Now.

Plant biologist injecting tiny amounts of virus into tomato, potato, lettuce leaves. University of Ottawa plant biologist Allyson MacLean demonstrates the process for injecting edible plants with bacterial solution, which will hopefully cause the leaves to gradually produce a vaccine for COVID-19. Eating your veggies isn't only good for you — it may someday protect you against COVID-19. That's the hope of a plant biologist at the University of Ottawa who's working to create an edible vaccine for the novel coronavirus. Allyson MacLean's research involves injecting tomato, potato and lettuce plants with a tiny particle of viral DNA swimming in a bacterial solution. "We take a syringe that does not have a needle point. You press it up against the large leaf … and you basically push … the bacteria into the plant tissues," said MacLean, 41, an assistant professor of plant biology. The bacteria piggyback that DNA into the plant, which triggers the production of viral proteins. Eating the plant allows these proteins to pass through the digestive system, where they're taken up by special cells in the gut, stimulating a type of immunity. It's called "mucosal immunity," and it's of particular interest to the scientists currently joined in battle with COVID-19 because the virus that causes the disease, SARS-CoV-2, enters the body via the mucosal surface of the respiratory system. MacLean has spent a decade researching symbiosis in nature, specifically how microbes and plants co-exist. One of the most common microbes is Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which lives in soil and naturally latches onto plants. "It finds a wound in the plant and it gets in there. It takes part of its DNA and injects it into a plant cell. It basically makes the plant cells grow tumours … that the bacteria can then use as a food source," MacLean explained. "People realized a few decades ago that this was going on in nature," she said. "Somebody had the brilliant idea: OK, can we harness this as a way of making genetically modified organisms?" In her current research to create an edible vaccine for COVID-19, MacLean is using "parts of the virus that other researchers believe will elicit a strong protective antibody response." They're catching a ride into the plant tissue on the back of her old friend Agrobacterium. At this point in the research, MacLean is using a close relative of tobacco to determine the best way to make a plant express the viral proteins. Next stop, lettuce. The pandemic hasn't made MacLean's research easy. When COVID-19 struck in March, she struggled to move her hands-on laboratory course online, and began alternating work days with her husband so they could care for their two children, ages one and four. "It was having to simultaneously balance unprecedented challenges in terms of research, in terms of teaching and in terms of myself as a parent," MacLean said. "It was really hard." She was especially worried about her "precious transgenic mutant plants" that were left behind in the lab when the U of O campus was shut down due to COVID-19. "You can't just stop caring for them or you will lose them," said MacLean, who arranged permission to feed and fertilize the plants three times a week. MacLean had an early fascination with biology and ecology. As a child, she set up a dragon fly hospital in her bedroom, catching flies for her patients' dinner. She harboured a garter snake in her closet one winter. She remembers dabbing a drop of liquid paper on toads in her backyard to see if she could trace their movements. "I always very much loved living organisms. They just got smaller," she said. There are a few conventional COVID-19 vaccines already at the human trial stage, but "it's premature to stop exploring other avenues," said MacLean — especially if the outcome is a more efficient route to global immunity. "Plant-based vaccines are better for the developing world. They're cheaper to produce. They don't need … to be refrigerated for long periods of time." Plus, she believes people would rather eat their medicine than get a shot. "People are more willing to ingest a vaccine than they are to get a needle." MacLean's work will be tested on mice in collaboration with John Bell of the Ottawa Health Research Institute. "This project is pairing up a cancer researcher who uses viruses to tackle cancer and a plant biologist who normally studies the way microorganisms interact with plants," MacLean said. "We're both stretching out of our comfort zones." Covid-19 vaccine side effect leaves women questioning why birth control pill is not safer Concerns over blood clotting in connection with Covid-19 vaccines have raised questions around why birth control pills. In April, as the Food and Drug Administration paused use of Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine to evaluate the risk of blood clots in women younger than 50, many scientists noted that clots associated with birth control pills were much more common. The comparison was intended to reassure women of the vaccine’s safety. Instead, it has stoked anger in some quarters — not about the pause, but about the fact that most contraceptives available to women are hundreds of times riskier, and yet safer alternatives are not in sight. The clots linked to the vaccine were a dangerous type in the brain, while birth control pills increase the chances of a blood clot in the leg or lung — a point quickly noted by many experts. But the distinction made little difference to some women. “Where was everyone’s concern for blood clots when we started putting 14-year-old girls on the pill,” one woman wrote on Twitter. Another said, “If birth control was made for men, it’d taste like bacon and be free.” Some women heard, on social media and elsewhere, that they should not complain because they had chosen to take birth control knowing the risks involved. “That just made me double down,” said Mia Brett, an expert in legal history focused on race and sexuality at Stony Brook University in New York. “This is such a common response to women’s health care — that we point out something and it’s dismissed.” ‘They should be angry’ The torrent of fury online was familiar to experts in women’s health. “They should be angry — women’s health just does not get equal attention,” said Dr Eve Feinberg, a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist at Northwestern University. “There’s a huge sex bias in all of medicine.” Feinberg and many of the women online acknowledge that contraceptives have given women control over their fertility, and the benefits far exceed the harms. Rebecca Fishbein, a 31-year-old culture writer, started tweeting about the inadequacy of birth control pills almost immediately after the announcement of the pause. Still, “birth control is an incredible invention; thank God we have it,” she said in April in an interview. “I’ll fight anyone who tried to take it away.” ‘Overall, it’s incredibly safe’ Contraceptives have also improved over the years, with intrauterine devices and oral options that offer an ultralow dose of oestrogen. “Overall, it’s incredibly safe,” Feinberg said. “Everything that we do has risks.” But Feinberg said it was crucial for health care providers to discuss the risks with their patients and coach them on worrisome symptoms — a conversation many women said they had never had. Kelly Tyrrell, a communications professional in Madison, Wisconsin, was 37 when doctors discovered potentially fatal blood clots in her lungs. Tyrrell is an endurance athlete — wiry, strong and not prone to anxiety. In early 2019, she began waking up with a pain in her left calf. After one particularly bad morning, an urgent-care visit revealed that she had high blood levels of “D dimer,” a protein fragment that indicates the presence of clots. She had been taking birth control pills for 25 years, but none of the doctors made a connection. Instead, they said that given her age, fitness and the lack of other risk factors, her symptoms were unlikely to be from a blood clot. They sent her home with instructions to do stretches for her calf muscle. When she felt a tightness in her chest while running in Hawaii after her grandmother’s funeral, doctors said the cause was probably stress and anxiety. ‘I instantly burst into tears’ In July 2019, she finished a 100K race in Colorado and assumed that her aching lungs and purple lips were the result of running for 19 hours at a high altitude. But she knew something was seriously wrong on the morning of 24 October, 2019, when she became short of breath after walking up a short flight of stairs. This time, after ruling out heart problems, doctors scanned her lungs and discovered multiple clots. One had cut off blood flow to a portion of her right lung. “I instantly burst into tears,” Tyrrell recalled. The doctors put her on a course of blood thinners — and told her never to touch oestrogen again. Tyrrell switched to a copper IUD. Over time, she added, the incident had escalated into a sharp rage that was renewed by the Johnson & Johnson news. “Part of my anger was that a medication that I took to control my fertility ended up threatening my mortality,” she said. “I’m angry that I hadn’t been counselled better about that risk, or even what to look for.” Emily Farris, 36, was prescribed oral contraceptives at age 8 to help with migraines. In all of the conversations she has had with her many doctors over the years, “never once was blood clots brought up,” she said in an interview. On Twitter, some critics pointed out that the inserts with birth control packs clearly describe the blood clot risk. “My response is a bit incredulous to that,” said Farris, a political scientist at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth. The inserts for most medications have a long list of possible side effects, placing “a high burden for folks to try to sort through medical research, to sort through what probability and statistics mean,” she said. Even with a doctorate-level education, “I can’t assess those risks,” Farris added. “I think most Americans need someone to translate what the legalese kind of pamphlet is into real terms.” For Tyrrell, that elucidation came much too late. Her lungs have not felt the same since her diagnosis, but she cannot be sure whether that is because of lingering damage from a previous blood clot, new clots that she should be worried about or simply her age, she said, adding: “It’s never not on my mind anymore.” Following the death of a 32 year woman, who suffered from blood clotting a couple weeks after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Thailand has advised women think about whether to stop taking birth control pills before receiving the Covid-19 vaccines due to a possible increased risk of blood clots. The doctor spoke during a live streaming session following the death of 32 year old Naririn Angthong. The woman from Thailand’s Deep South province Yala died from blood clotting in her lungs 2 weeks after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. She was injected with the vaccine on May 14 and died on May 27 at Hat Yai Hospital. The death is still under investigation. While there’s no evidence that the vaccine will increase the risk of blood clots for women who are taking the daily contraceptive pill, the hormones in the medication increase the risk, according to Siraya Kitiyodom, an OB-GYN at Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital. She says women who are concerned with potential side effects of the vaccine might want to consider other birth control methods Another health official in Thailand also advised women to stop taking the pill before receiving a Covid-19 vaccine. The head of the Centre for Emerging Disease Health Sciences at the Faculty of Medicine at Chulalongkorn University, Thiravat Hemachudha, wrote on his Facebook page saying women should should stop taking hormone contraceptive pills at least 14 days before getting vaccinated against the coronavirus. He also said people should stop taking migraine medicine before getting the vaccine. Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines The future of vaccines may look more like eating a salad than getting a shot in the arm. UC Riverside scientists are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories. Messenger RNA or mRNA technology, used in COVID-19 vaccines, works by teaching our cells to recognize and protect us against infectious diseases. One of the challenges with this new technology is that it must be kept cold to maintain stability during transport and storage. If this new project is successful, plant-based mRNA vaccines -; which can be eaten -; could overcome this challenge with the ability to be stored at room temperature. The project's goals, made possible by a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, are threefold: showing that DNA containing the mRNA vaccines can be successfully delivered into the part of plant cells where it will replicate, demonstrating the plants can produce enough mRNA to rival a traditional shot, and finally, determining the right dosage. "Ideally, a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person," said Juan Pablo Giraldo, an associate professor in UCR's Department of Botany and Plant Sciences who is leading the research, done in collaboration with scientists from UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon University. Key to making this work are chloroplasts -; small organs in plant cells that convert sunlight into energy the plant can use. "They're tiny, solar-powered factories that produce sugar and other molecules which allow the plant to grow," Giraldo said. "They're also an untapped source for making desirable molecules." In the past, Giraldo has shown that it is possible for chloroplasts to express genes that aren't naturally part of the plant. He and his colleagues did this by sending foreign genetic material into plant cells inside a protective casing. Determining the optimal properties of these casings for delivery into plant cells is a specialty of Giraldo's laboratory. For this project Giraldo teamed up with Nicole Steinmetz, a UC San Diego professor of nanoengineering, to utilize nanotechnologies engineered by her team that will deliver genetic material to the chloroplasts. "Our idea is to repurpose naturally occurring nanoparticles, namely plant viruses, for gene delivery to the plants," Steinmetz said. "Some engineering goes into this to make the nanoparticles go to the chloroplasts and also to render them non-infectious toward the plants." For Giraldo, the chance to develop this idea with mRNA is the culmination of a dream. "One of the reasons I started working in nanotechnology was so I could apply it to plants and create new technology solutions. Not just for food, but for high-value products as well, like pharmaceuticals," Giraldo said. He is also co-leading a related project using nanomaterials to deliver nitrogen, a fertilizer, directly to chloroplasts, where plants need it most. Nitrogen is limited in the environment, but plants need it to grow. Most farmers apply nitrogen to the soil. As a result, roughly half of it ends up in groundwater, contaminating waterways, causing algae blooms, and interacting with other organisms. It also produces nitrous oxide, another pollutant. This alternative approach would get nitrogen into the chloroplasts through the leaves and control its release, a much more efficient mode of application that could help farmers and improve the environment. The National Science Foundation has granted Giraldo and his colleagues $1.6 million to develop this targeted nitrogen delivery technology. "I'm very excited about all of this research," Giraldo said. "I think it could have a huge impact on peoples' lives." Marijuana and COVID-19: What a Doctor Wants You to Know With the rapid spread of the new coronavirus throughout the globe, people are looking for ways to protect their health and lessen the risk of COVID-19 complications. Because having damaged lungs is one of the main risk factors for complications, smoking of any kind is being discouraged by health experts. As it's become legal in some parts of the U.S., many people use cannabis products for both medical and recreational purposes, and some who smoke, inhale, or vape marijuana are wondering if it’s safer to switch to alternatives, like “edibles” to protect their lungs and immune systems. Just like the developing science around COVID-19, the facts around cannabis are also murky. To help me navigate the data, I turned to several scientists behind the 2017 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report on the health effects of cannabis and related products. According to Daniele Piomelli, PhD, professor of anatomy and neurobiology, and Chair in Neuroscience at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, “we don’t have a lot to go on” when it comes to marijuana and the risk for viral infections like COVID-19, but there are definitely some steps we can take when it comes to reducing harms from marijuana use. Are edibles (and other non-inhaled forms) safer than smoking marijuana? There is a lot of evidence that points to an association between long-term cannabis smoking and lung damage causing chronic cough and phlegm production. There’s also evidence that when you stop, these lung symptoms can improve. “Are edibles safer than smoked cannabis? Yes, they are safer to the lung – that is a slam dunk,” says Piomelli. He stresses, however, that they are not risk free. He points out that it is almost impossible to know for sure how much THC (the active ingredient that gives the “high”) is in edible forms like gummies and chocolates because manufacturers are not bound by rules to abide by what is listed on the label. (While this is the case in most states, several states that have legalized cannabis use require that manufacturers lab test products to ensure the dosage information on the label is accurate for all legally sold products.) When someone smokes, they have a much better sense of when to stop based on how they are feeling. This is not the case for edibles, says Piomelli. “One or two hours later, all of a sudden, it can hit like a sledgehammer – you can have a ‘bad trip’ (and) once you have it there is no undoing it. You have to wait it out until it is metabolized and out of your system.” Side effects from overdose, like paranoia, panic, and nausea are mostly a risk for people who are switching to new products, where people don’t know how their bodies will react. Another important point is that edibles usually are high in sugar, which is not ideal for maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Does cannabis have beneficial effects that help with anxiety? There is growing concern about the mental health impacts of the coronavirus pandemic. Add social isolation from strict lockdowns to economic stressors, and there is growing evidence that people are looking for ways to curb their anxiety. A recent study showed that prescriptions for anti-anxiety medications, anti-depressants, and anti-insomnia medicines increased after the WHO declared a global pandemic. There’s also evidence that alcohol sales and alcohol consumption have increased during this time. Piomelli says “It’s understandable that people may be using more cannabis at home these days. Once the numbers are found out, we will have more data on this.” He suggests that cannabis products that people are comfortable and familiar with may be reasonable in moderation, and are likely safer than alcohol and other psychoactive substances. According to the NAS report, people should be aware, however that regular, long-term use may increase the risk for developing social anxiety disorder and heavy users are more likely to report thoughts of suicide. It’s also important to realize that if you are using cannabis to “self-medicate” for anxiety, you should reach out to a professional for help. How does cannabis affect the immune system? Given the COVID-19 pandemic, there’s a lot of interest around maintaining a healthy immune system. The NAS report delved into the evidence around the effects of cannabis on the immune system and the susceptibility to viral infections. There is an intriguing finding noting a small body of evidence that shows that cannabis may decrease the production of several inflammatory cytokines (immune system proteins). This is an important area of study right now, because scientists have found that in many of the most severe cases of COVID-19, there seems to be an over-production of these cytokines, also known as “cytokine storm,” which prompts the body to attack its own cells and tissues instead of fighting the virus. It’s really important to know, however, that the immune system is made up of a variety of cells and chemical signalers that interact through a complex interplay, so it’s hard to say where cannabis may help tamp down the immune system and where it may hurt by increasing the risk of infection. Piomelli points out that a few more scientific papers have been released since the 2017 NAS report looking at cannabis and viral infections. One particular study looked at the evidence not only around THC containing cannabis but also cannabidiol (CBD). CBD is also found in the cannabis plant, but unlike THC, does not have the properties that cause the “high.” The findings from this study are encouraging and will hopefully prompt further study because there may be a chance that CBD can help control inflammation and help manage certain viruses – but the evidence is still scant. “The point is we don’t enough data. I wish we did,” says Piomelli. Major takeaways: Inhaling, smoking, or vaping cannabis products in the face of COVID-19 is not recommended. If cannabis use is legal where you live and you want to switch to edibles or other forms of cannabis, make sure it’s a known entity that you have experience with, and use only in moderation. (Remember that these products can be high in sugar content.) With edibles, there is a higher risk of a “bad trip,” especially for those who have not used them in the past. There is not enough evidence to know the effects of cannabis on the immune system or on the susceptibility to viral infections. Consider other ways of managing anxiety. Creating a routine that includes exercise, proper nutrition, meditation, and regular social interactions can help manage stress in a healthy way. If you are using cannabis to treat anxiety, reach out for help from a mental health professional Editor's note: This post has been updated to acknowledge that edibles may be regulated in some states. COVID-19 vaccines: Get the facts Looking to get the facts about COVID-19 vaccines? Here's what you need to know about the different vaccines and the benefits of getting vaccinated. As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, you might have questions about COVID-19 vaccines. Find out about the different types of COVID-19 vaccines, how they work, the possible side effects, and the benefits for you and your family. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-vaccine/art-20484859 COVID-19 Vaccines Will Kill You ? Animation What Happens If You Get Coronavirus Effect - https://rumble.com/v2dt6zk-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-you-animation-what-happens-if-you-get-coronavir.html - These studies help prove that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy is not associated with higher rates of miscarriage. Nevertheless, more research is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and combat persistent misinformation. Continued investment and investigation is critical to fighting vaccine hesitancy and preventing the further spread of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed WHO’s DoV vision led to a collaboration in which Bill Gates’ GAVI serves on the leadership council. The Global Vaccine Action Plan (“GVAP”) – endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 – came out of the collaboration. The “leadership” that produced the GVAP are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance, UNICEF, United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the World Health Organization (“WHO”). Livestock Vax Based On COVID-19 Vaccine Technology Raises Concerns A livestock vaccine using the same technology as the COVID-19 vaccine hasn’t been approved for use, but some legislators are moving to implement labeling rules on foods coming from animals that receive the vaccine. A molecular biologist said the vaccine can’t get into the foods being labeled. Pharmaceutical companies are developing vaccines for livestock that work using the same technology as the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines are a sensitive topic for many, and though none of these livestock vaccines have been approved for use in the U.S., some lawmakers are introducing legislation to label meats that come from animals that have received these vaccines. A molecular biologist said these laws are unnecessary and misleading, because the vaccines can't get into the food supply. How They Work The vaccines work by introducing a piece of messenger RNA (mRNA) that corresponds to a viral protein. The mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus of the cell and cannot alter DNA. Using the mRNA, cells produce the viral protein, and the immune system, as part of its normal response, produces antibodies that fight off future infections. Currently, the COVID-19 vaccine is the only mRNA approved for use in the U.S. on humans. Lawmakers in Arizona, Idaho, and Missouri have introduced legislation related to the use of mRNA vaccines in food. The Arizona bill only restricts labeling such food as organic. The Idaho bill amends state law to prohibit the sale of such foods unless conspicuously labeled that the presence of the vaccine is in the food. The Missouri bill requires a conspicuous "Gene Therapy Product" label. Dr. Kevin Folta told Cowboy State Daily the proposed "gene therapy" label is inaccurate. It "means they have no idea what they are trying to regulate," Folta said, because "there is no integration into the DNA. Its a transient set of instructions, like a USB drive. Not a hard drive." Folta is a professor of the horticultural sciences in the horticultural sciences department of the University of Florida. He has a Ph.D. in molecular biology from the University of Illinois in Chicago. He's been an outspoken advocate against claims that genetically modified organisms are unsafe or that the use of pesticides and herbicides cause negative health impacts. mRNA-Free Cows To illustrate the lack of accurate information on these livestock vaccines, Folta recently tweeted a photo of a cow stating it was happily "mRNA free." Messenger RNA occurs naturally as part of the function of cells in the body. "mRNA is everywhere, and you cant live without mRNA," Folta said. Folta explained that the mRNA vaccines could save the cattle industry billions every year. There are a number of viral diseases, including hoof and mouth disease, pseudorabies and avian influenza. The vaccines, Folta explained, are used to vaccinate the animals against these and other highly contagious diseases. Some of these diseases are zoonotic, meaning humans can get them from animals, such as rabies, avian influenza, and lyme disease. The vaccines can also prevent the diseases from jumping from livestock to wildlife, which can be very susceptible to epidemics. Unfortunate Situation His efforts to communicate accurate science on agriculture issues have made him the target of organic food advocates. They accuse him of receiving funding from biotech companies. The Organic Consumers Association funded a campaign to file multiple Freedom of Information Act requests with the University of Florida to delve into Folta's emails, hoping to prove that he was paid by biotech companies to communicate his science-based perspectives. Nothing was ever found indicating he had committed any scientific misconduct. The campaign was such a drain on resources in the department that he was asked to cease his speaking engagements and just teach classes. He said he's been able to come to an understanding with the university. "It really is an unfortunate situation because we were making some really good progress," Folta said. Folta said that the vaccines can't get into the food people eat. "mRNA is an extremely unstable molecule. That's why it works. It's very temporary. So when an animal is slaughtered or when a plant dies, mRNA is the first thing to go," Folta said. He said it can't be stable at room temperature or when it's not being actively produced. Besides its instability, it's injected into a localized area on the animal. Because the vaccines can protect livestock herds from illness, the cattle industry is interested in the mRNA vaccines, Folta said. When it comes to communicating their safety, Folta said, the benefit to ranchers isn't always convincing because it runs up against a lot of anti-agricultural bias. He tries to stress the benefits to wildlife and humans. "There's way too much of that [anti-agriculture bias] out there. But the same people who don't like farmers sure do like conservation. So we can protect wild populations and humans," Folta said. Transparency Labeling Missouri State Rep. Holly Jones, who sponsored the Missouri bill, told Cowboy State Daily that the legislation doesn't ban the use of the vaccines. "The public deserves to understand what is in their food supply," Jones said. She said that mRNA technology is being used without the right amount of studies on safety and efficacy, and she doesn't think the "gene therapy" label would be problematic. Jones said that we already have labels we put on products, such as "grass-fed beef" and "non-GMO." "There needs to be something specific to gene therapy labeling, especially when it comes to our food supply," Jones said. "We have to be specific enough that people understand what they're putting in their body. I believe consumers deserve to have that information." Jones said that her bill would support farmers who would become vulnerable to lawsuits without those labels. "This is actually pro-business," Jones said. Catastrophic Brett Moline, director of public and governmental affairs for the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, told Cowboy State Daily that the vaccines in use today are vital to the livestock industries. When the cows are branded, they get a set of shots to protect them from diseases. "What's keeping the diseases from being on the front page is we don't have outbreaks of diseases, like black leg. You just don't hear about them anymore," Moline said. The health of the animals is important to producers and their bottom line, Moline said, and so keeping disease under control is part of the business. With profits in the industry on the margin, every animals health counts. "Happy cows make ranchers happy. To take away that tool could be just catastrophic," Moline said. COVID-19 AND BEEF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Q: Are animals responsible for COVID-19 in people? The predominant route of transmission of COVID-19 appears to be from human to human.1 According to the CDC, there is no evidence that animals, including pets, play a significant role in spreading the virus that causes COVID-19. In isolated cases, it appears the virus can spread from people to animals, though further research is needed to understand how animals could be affected by COVID-19. Based on limited information available, the risk of the virus spreading between animals and people is considered low.9 Current evidence suggests that the COVID-19 virus has an animal source. Ongoing investigations are important for identifying the animal source. To date, there is not enough scientific evidence to identify that source or to explain the route of transmission from an animal source to humans.1 Q: Can the bovine coronavirus vaccine be used to treat people? Bovine coronavirus is NOT the same as COVID-19. There is no evidence to suggest that the bovine coronavirus vaccine has any effect on humans or the COVID-19 strain. Vaccines are developed and tested for specific strains of viruses and species and should only be used according to label instructions. 2, 3 The bovine coronavirus, as the name suggests, is specific to cattle and other domestic animals (i.e., horses, water buffalo, deer, elk, etc.). There is no cross protection between bovine coronavirus and COVID-19. 2, 3 There are currently no antiviral drugs recommended or licensed by FDA to treat COVID-19, and there is no immunization available.4 Q: Will beef from cattle vaccinated for bovine coronavirus help build immunity against COVID-19? There is no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Even if a vaccine for bovine coronavirus is used in cattle, there is a 21-day or 60-day meat withdrawal period, depending on the vaccine, required prior to processing. This ensures the end product is safe for consumption and no medication would be present in the beef.5 Q: What impact is COVID-19 having on the beef supply? Cattle farmers and ranchers continue to produce high-quality beef. As COVID-19 continues to spread and impact economic activity, there is a great deal of uncertainty in terms of what it means for the beef industry, including on supply and demand. At this time, it’s impossible to measure the full effects of the virus or determine how it may continue to unfold. Q: How does bovine coronavirus affect cattle?2, 3 Bovine coronavirus is a cattle virus that farmers and ranchers have vaccinated their cattle against and managed for years. It can manifest as either a respiratory infection or gastrointestinal disease in cattle of all ages. Gastrointestinal signs include profuse diarrhea, dehydration, depression, reduced weight gain and anorexia. Bovine coronavirus has been associated with upper and lower respiratory tract disease and is a component of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex. Signs may include respiratory distress, fever, nasal discharge, and coughing. Like other viral infections, other factors can influence an animal’s risk of infection and its ability to overcome the infection. These include host factors such as immunologic status or coinfections with a secondary bacterial infection and environmental factors such as extreme cold or hot temperatures. Q: How do farmers and ranchers care for the cattle if they are sick with bovine coronavirus?5 Farmers and ranchers use a variety of tools, including vaccines, good nutrition programs, low-stress handling, and proper housing to keep animals healthy. If necessary, antibiotics may be a tool that farmers and ranchers use to treat an animal. Beef farmers and ranchers work with veterinarians and animal health experts to ensure antibiotics are used responsibly. The beef community has significantly invested in educational programs, like Beef Quality Assurance and research to maintain high standards of animal care and health, including continuously improving the stewardship of antibiotics used in cattle. Q: What is Beef Quality Assurance (BQA)?5 Developed in 1991, Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) is a voluntary certification program that provides the U.S. beef industry with a consistent set of animal welfare standards and best practices.  The BQA program exemplifies what beef farmers and ranchers have always cared about – a commitment to caring for their animals and providing families with the safest and highest-quality beef possible.  Consumers can feel good knowing there’s a national program in place that sets consistent animal welfare and care standards across the beef industry. The result is wholesome safe, high-quality meat. More than 85 percent of the beef supply in the U.S. comes from farms and ranches that adhere to BQA standards and guidelines, and this number continues to increase monthly.  The BQA program is nationally coordinated by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), a contractor to the Beef Checkoff.   Q: Can I become sick with COVID-19 from food? USDA is not aware of any reports at this time of human illnesses that suggest COVID-19 can be transmitted by food or food packaging. However, it is always important to follow good hygiene practices (i.e., wash hands and surfaces often, separate raw meat from other foods, cook to the right temperature, and refrigerate foods promptly) when handling or preparing foods.6 According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), meat from healthy livestock that is prepared and served in accordance with good hygiene and food safety principles remains safe to eat.1 Q: Are meat products compromised by COVID-19? USDA is not aware of any reports at this time of human illnesses that suggest COVID-19 can be transmitted by food or food packaging. However, it is always important to follow good hygiene practices (i.e., wash hands and surfaces often, separate raw meat from other foods, cook to the right temperature, and refrigerate foods promptly) when handling or preparing foods.6 According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), meat from healthy livestock that is prepared and served in accordance with good hygiene and food safety principles remains safe to eat.1 Q: Are food products produced in the United States a risk for the spread of COVID-19? There is no evidence to suggest that food produced in the United States can transmit COVID-19.6 According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), meat from healthy livestock that is prepared and served in accordance with good hygiene and food safety principles remains safe to eat.1 Q: Can I get sick with COVID-19 from touching food, the food packaging, or food contact surfaces, if the coronavirus was present on it? Currently there is no evidence of food or food packaging being associated with transmission of COVID-19. Like other viruses, it is possible that the virus that causes COVID-19 can survive on surfaces or objects. For that reason, it is critical to follow the 4 key steps of food safety — clean, separate, cook, and chill.6 Q: If an inspector or worker in a meat processing plant became infected with coronavirus, would the meat produced at that facility be safe to eat? Public health and food safety experts do not have any evidence to suggest that COVID-19 can be transmitted by food or food packaging. FSIS in-plant personnel who are ill with COVID-19 or any other illness will be excluded from work activities that could create unsanitary conditions (coughing or sneezing on product). COVID-19 is thought to spread mainly from person to person through respiratory droplets that can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby.1, 6 Q: Can companion animals spread COVID-19? Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that animals infected by humans are playing a role in the spread of COVID-19. Human outbreaks are driven by person to person transmission.1 Studies are underway to better understand the susceptibility of different animal species to the COVID-19 virus and to assess infection dynamics in susceptible animal species. Preliminary findings from laboratory studies suggest that, of the animal species investigated so far, cats are the most susceptible species for COVID-19, and, in a laboratory setting, cats were able to transmit infection to other cats. Ferrets also appear to be susceptible to infection but less so to disease. In the laboratory setting ferrets were also able to transmit infection to other ferrets. Dogs appear to be susceptible to infection but appear to be less affected than ferrets or cats.i1 While there are currently no reports of cattle testing positive for COVID-19, now that COVID-19 virus infections are widely distributed in the human population there is a possibility for some animals to become infected through close contact with infected humans or a fomite that carries the virus for a short time.i1 Further studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by COVID-19. State animal and public health officials are working closely with USDA and CDC to monitor this situation and will conduct additional testing if it is warranted.8 Q: Could a farmer or rancher with COVID-19 infect cattle with the virus? While there are currently no reports of cattle testing positive for COVID-19, now that COVID-19 virus infections are widely distributed in the human population there is a possibility for some animals to become infected through close contact with infected humans.1 Further studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by COVID-19. State animal and public health officials are working closely with USDA and CDC to monitor this situation and will conduct additional testing if it is warranted. Anyone sick with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals out of an abundance of caution during their illness, just as they would with other people. Although there have not been reports of animals beyond a tiger at the Bronx zoo becoming sick with COVID-19 in the United States, it is still recommended that people sick with COVID-19 limit contact with animals until more information is known about the virus. If a sick person must care for a pet or be around animals, they should wash their hands before and after the interaction. Q: If cattle were to become infected with COVID-19, would beef from those animals be safe for human consumption? There are currently no reports of cattle testing positive for COVID-19. The USDA is not aware of any reports at this time of human illnesses that suggest COVID-19 can be transmitted by food or food packaging. However, it is always important to follow good hygiene practices (i.e., wash hands and surfaces often, separate raw meat from other foods, cook to the right temperature, and refrigerate foods promptly) when handling or preparing foods.6 According to the World Organization for Animal Health, meat from healthy livestock that is prepared and served in accordance with good hygiene and food safety principles remains safe to eat.1 Q: Did animal agriculture contribute to the emergence of COVID-19? Current evidence suggests that the COVID-19 virus has an animal source. Ongoing investigations are important for identifying the animal source. To date, there is not enough scientific evidence to identify that source or to explain the route of transmission from an animal source to humans.1 There is no evidence that cattle contributed in any way to the introduction of COVID-19 to humans. Coronaviruses that infect animals can sometimes be spread to people, but this is rare.9 Q: Could animal agriculture lead to future zoonotic-based pandemics? The best way to prevent future zoonotic-based pandemics is universal adoption of CDC’s One Health approach to disease control. One Health is a collaborative approach that works at local, national and global levels to recognize the interconnections between people, animals, plants, and their shared environments. The World Organization for Animal Health envisions One Health as a collaborative global approach for understanding risks for human and animal health. It builds on intergovernmental standards for One Health by publishing worldwide information on animal health collected through country reporting as well as a network of international disease experts and programs for strengthening the capacity of national veterinary service programs. Since 2012, NCBA has been involved with the activities of the One Health Academy in Washington, DC, which meets monthly to allow for information exchange and policy discussions related to One Health topics. Q: Could a disease like COVID-19 originate in the U.S. in the future? How does the U.S. prevent zoonotic diseases? While One Health is an approach recommended globally by the United Nations and World Bank, in the U.S. both the USDA and CDC operate offices of One Health that provide interagency communication, education, and mitigation measures surrounding emerging and zoonotic diseases that could threaten the U.S. Both of these government agencies also collaborate on several well-established and important zoonotic disease surveillance programs. Throughout its history, the USDA has played a central role in protecting the health of U.S. animal agriculture through essential services involving risk assessment, port of entry inspection for imported animals and agricultural products, regulation of biological agents, development of animal vaccines, performing state-of-the-art animal diagnostic testing, and delivery of comprehensive disease surveillance, control, and eradication. The U.S. has a proven history of controlling zoonotic diseases as evidenced by measures put into place to address bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis in the 1900s. Today, the U.S. is considered essentially free of these diseases. 10, 11 In the U.S., in addition to work done by USDA and CDC to address emerging and zoonotic diseases that could threaten human and animal health, the beef industry’s Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program establishes that every member of the beef production system adheres to high standards of care in every aspect of production to deliver healthy animals and high-quality beef. All types of cattle operations work with a veterinarian to create a customized care plan for their animals. These high-quality care plans contribute to healthier animals with less risk of becoming ill by addressing nutrition, animal husbandry, vaccination plans to prevent disease and low-stress animal handling techniques. Q: Do feedyards or other cattle operations where a large number of cattle are in close contact increase the likelihood of a zoonotic disease or outbreak originating and/or spreading? The U.S. is very good at controlling zoonotic diseases as evidenced by measures put into place to address bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis in the 1900s. Today, the U.S. is considered essentially free of these diseases.10, 11 Programs like Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) provide a total quality assurance program that establishes that every member of the beef production system adheres to high standards of care in every aspect of production to deliver healthy animals and high quality beef. All types of cattle operations work with a veterinarian to create a customized care plan for their animals. These high-quality care plans contribute to healthier animals with less risk of becoming ill by addressing nutrition, animal husbandry, vaccination plans to prevent disease and low-stress animal handling techniques. Q: Would reducing meat consumption lower the risk of future zoonotic diseases and pandemics? No. Whether for food or other purposes, interactions between animals and humans occur globally. The best way to prevent future zoonotic-based pandemics is universal adoption of a One Health approach to disease control. One Health is a collaborative approach that works at local, national and global levels to recognize the interconnections between people, animals, plants, and their shared environments.

No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect” An independent analysis of the accumulated Yellow Card data, finally released 18 months after the first FOI request, shows unequivocal safety signals linking the mRNA vaccines to serious damage to the lymph system, the heart, and female reproduction 'Health regulator failing to keep public protected from mRNA shots' IN the UK, three Covid-19 vaccines - AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna (MO) - have been used in a nationwide inoculation programmed aimed at preventing harm from the so-called SARS-CoV2 virus. Expert Claims Covid Vaccines Will Kill 700 million People Around the World. During an interview with USA Watchdog in June, Dr. David Martin predicted that 700 million people will die worldwide due to the Covid injections. He based his estimation on the World Health Organization's vision of the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ (“DoV”). There appears to be no scientific evidence that the Pfizer, Moderna COVID-19 vaccines will kill miscarriages. Scientists have not found an increased risk for miscarriage among people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine just before and during early pregnancy, and data did not surface "any safety concerns for people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine late in pregnancy or for their babies." Therefore, it can be concluded that vaccines do or do not cause miscarriages.? COVID-19 continues to pose a high risk to pregnant people who contract the virus. Despite this concern, hesitancy surrounding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy remains, write the authors of a preprint article on COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy outcomes. As COVID-19 vaccines become more widely available, some have raised concerns regarding potential links between receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and experiencing miscarriage (also known as spontaneous abortion), and other adverse outcomes. However, miscarriage is a common occurrence – around 10 to 15 percent of all pregnancies in the United States end in miscarriage – and multiple studies have found no increase in miscarriage in persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine. One study team used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) v-safe pregnancy registry, a smartphone-based tool for people in the United States who have received a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants were included if they had received at least one vaccine dose prior to conception or before 20 weeks gestation and did not have a pregnancy loss before 6 weeks gestation – pregnancies lost beyond 20 weeks gestation are considered stillbirths not miscarriages, and 6 weeks gestation is typically the earliest a pregnancy can be detected. Out of 2,456 participants, 165 experienced a spontaneous abortion. The study found that the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion between 6 and 20 weeks gestation was 14.1 percent. Among the study participants, 65 participants were contacted in their first trimester, but could not be reached during their second. To account for this drop-out, the study team conducted a “sensitivity analysis” with the assumption that these 65 participants experienced a spontaneous abortion. In this analysis, the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion rose to 18.8 percent. The study team then used data from historical cohorts to represent the “typical” upper and lower ranges of risk of spontaneous abortion before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. They found that the calculated cumulative risk – both with and without the sensitivity analysis – fell within the expected risk range. A second study also concludes that the COVID-19 vaccine poses no increased risk for miscarriage and bolsters the findings of the prior study with the inclusion of a comparison group. This study used the Vaccine Safety Datalink database, a collaboration between the CDC and nine health systems across the United States. Researchers included individuals who received their first dose of the vaccine within 6 to 19 weeks gestation and assigned each an “index date” to reflect when they entered the study. They then compared this group to a contemporaneous cohort of unvaccinated pregnant individuals to determine the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. The study compared the odds that a participant who had a spontaneous abortion had received a vaccine within 28 days of the event with the odds that a participant who carried a pregnancy to term had the same vaccine criteria. The study team found that, compared to participants with ongoing pregnancies, those who had a spontaneous abortion were not significantly more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine. These studies help prove that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy is not associated with higher rates of miscarriage. Nevertheless, more research is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and combat persistent misinformation. Continued investment and investigation is critical to fighting vaccine hesitancy and preventing the further spread of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed WHO’s DoV vision led to a collaboration in which Bill Gates’ GAVI serves on the leadership council. The Global Vaccine Action Plan (“GVAP”) – endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 – came out of the collaboration. The “leadership” that produced the GVAP are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance, UNICEF, United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the World Health Organization (“WHO”). We previously published an article about Dr. Martin’s interview with USA Watchdog but we feel it’s important to remind readers of the scale of the estimated deaths from the bioweapon that is called a Covid vaccine. The number that might die from Covid injections may have been revealed back in 2011 when WHO announced their “decade of vaccines.” The objective for the decade of vaccination was a population reduction of 15% globally, which would be about 700 million people dead. Some may think this number of deaths is an exaggeration, but Dr. Martin is not the only one who has been raising the alarm. Dr. Robert Young estimated in August 2021 that 500 million people worldwide had already been injured, with potentially 35 million deaths, due to Covid injections. A year later in August 2022, Steve Kirsch estimated a ballpark number of 12 million Covid injection deaths based on an estimate of one death for every 1,000 doses – “we are killing nearly close to 10,000 people every single day,” he wrote. Also in August, Peter Halligan, by piecing together data from a variety of sources, suggested as many as 20 million people worldwide had died from Covid injections, while another 2.2 billion have suffered injuries – implying we are only just getting started. And finally, we have psychopath Bill Gates himself. In 2009 The Guardian reported on the first meeting of the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists including Bill Gates, George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner. “The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease,” The Guardian wrote. And here’s a reminder of what Gates said the following year at TedTalks in 2010 spouting his vision of how to “innovate to zero”: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 per cent.” David Martin, PhD, is an inventor, speaker, author, business executive and futurist. He is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM, an international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. During his hour-long interview in June, Dr. Martin told USA Watchdog that the Covid injections are “bioweapons.” Big Pharma and the government knew it and also knew it would cause massive deaths and permanent injuries. Dr. Martin said: “It’s going to get much worse … It is not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin … The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated … This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.” As to how many will die from Covid injections Dr. Martin said: “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people globally, and that would put the US participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people …There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.” Dr. Martin explained: “The dirty secret is . . . there are a lot of pilots having microvascular and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they are going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack. The problem is we are going to see that exact same phenomenon in the healthcare industry and at a much larger scale. So, we now have, along with the actual problem . . . of people getting sick and people dying, we actually have that targeting the healthcare industry writ large. This means we are going to have nurses and doctors who are going to be among the sick and dead. That also means the sick and the dying are also not going to get care.” On 3 March Dr. Martin filed a lawsuit against Joe Biden. He and his group are suing everybody from President Biden to the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and many others over the deaths and injuries from the Covid-19 bioweapons fraudulently passed off as “vaccines.” He contended that “this is far worse” than the Nuremberg trials of Nazis after WWII and added: “This is organised crime . . . They have hidden behind the immunity shield that absolves them of product liability by naming the delivery of a bioweapon – a vaccination program … This is actually a criminal act. This is an act of domestic terror, and it is an anti-trust violation. This is racketeering. This is old-school racketeering, and it is no different than the mob in the 1920s. This is old-school racketeering for personal gain and profit at the expense of human lives. You need to call it what it is, and it’s organized crime. I would say the Nazis were better than the people who are doing this … The real question is why did American citizens develop a weapon to kill Americans and get paid to do it? That is a morally outrageous question, and, unfortunately, almost no one is asking it.” 8 Ways mRNA COVID Vaccines Can Kill You. Dr Sherri Tenpenny has mapped out ten mechanisms of action of how the mRNA vaccine is going to kill people. She says, “When you inject the mRNA, the Messenger RNA starts to code for the spike protein…the NIH is now fighting with Moderna over patent rights, because you can’t patent anything that’s out in nature, so they had to manipulate the spike protein, in order to be able to patent it and then make an antibody to the spike protein. “Well, this anti-spike protein antibody is deadly. It’s absolutely deadly. And the first three papers I went through, I found that one of the things the spike protein does is it directly attacks lung tissue and breaks it down. “The second thing that it does is it inhibits your M2 macrophages, which are your anti-inflammatory macrophages, so you get cytokine storm and you die. “The third is that when that Messenger RNA goes in and makes an antibody to the spike protein, it binds it loosely, carries it into a cell and causes permanent replication. So it’s like having an “On” button with no “Off” button. You’re constantly making this little piece of protein develop more spike proteins against it, make more destruction. “And then, with this paper that I read last night, of this anti-spike protein, it attacks the astrocytes and the oligodendrocytes, which are two different kinds of cells in your brain. Two different kinds of central nervous system [cells]. It attacks the inner mitochondria membrane, in two different mechanisms and it attacks this neurofilament protein, which are the motor nerves, which suddenly –we’ve seen those people [with strong tremors], it’s because the spike protein antibody is affecting their motor neurons and their central nervous system. “And then the primary, number one symptom that people have after they get this vaccine is debilitating fatigue, that they can’t even function in the main part of their lives. Well, it’s because the spike protein antibody attacks the mitochondria and it attacks the GAD 65, which is the intracellular antigen inside of your mitochondria and it can also attack you pancreas. “If you’re diabetic, it’ll make your diabetes worse. If you’re not diabetic, it can cause you to have diabetes, stiff-person syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, which is what thing that you’re watching [massive tremors]; people not able to walk. “In the experiment that they did, they took different tissue antigens, like skin and lung and all this other stuff and then they dropped the serum that had the antibody all over it. 27 out of 55 of the tissue types reacted adversely to the spike antibody. “So you get this vaccine, you create this antibody, that’s why in the most recent VAERS report that came out this week, 181 deaths, already that have been reported and when you start reading through them, you kind of lay out what these antibodies do, you can see it, right in the VAERS report, what has happened to these people and it’s the anti-spike antibody that’s attacking them and that’s why the most number of deaths occurred about 19 days after the injection, because it takes a while to develop the antibody response. It doesn’t happen just like that. “Unless you have an anaphylactic reaction – probably to the polyethylene glycol– unless you have an immediate reaction to it, the delayed reaction is going to start – it takes a while – I talked to a bunch of epidemiologists in Europe and they said that it takes about 48 weeks to really see the most profound effects of autoimmune disease. “When I found the first four mechanisms of action, I said to a few friends of mine, ‘This is a perfectly-designed kill machine.’ “Perfectly-designed, because – the other thing is with that replicating thing, because with the vaccine, you’re going to see mutants [of COVID]. So now, we’re all talking about the mutants. The one thing they’re not asking these people, who’ve been diagnosed with this mutant strain, is ‘Have you had one of the not-approved vaccines?’ Nobody’s putting that together. “So, yes, 48 weeks – so it’s somewhere between 48 weeks, so it’s about a year and 6 to 7 months and a couple of years into the future. “So, like you were talking about the girl with meningitis vaccine? This is going to be even worse. So people have got to make some serious spiritual decisions about this…Are you going to say, ‘Oh, I want to get the vaccine so I can get on an airplane,’ or ‘So I can go out to eat,’ or I can keep my job.’ That gets a little harder. Or ‘So I can continue in professional school,’ which gets a little bit harder. “People are going to have to start making some really hard spiritual decisions about this.” Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Funeral Embalmer: 85% of Dead Bodies Now Have Strange Blood Clots Since COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-outs 80 Canadian Doctors DEAD Following COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates as Death Toll Continues to Rise 4,500 Dead Babies in VAERS From Pregnant Women Injected with COVID-19 Shots, but Florida Only Pulls COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendation for Young Men 32 Young Canadian Doctors “Died Suddenly” in the Past 16 Months While Fully COVID-19 Vaccinated SADS: “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” Explodes as Young and Healthy Adults Die Following COVID Vaccine Mandates 76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines 6 Canadian Medical Doctors Died Within 2 Weeks After 4th COVID Booster Shots for Employees Started at One Hospital 76,253 Dead 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. Injecting Babies with COVID-19 Vaccines: Brain Damage, Seizures, Rashes are Recorded Side Effects in VAERS Official Government Data Record 74,783 Deaths and 5,830,235 Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S. and Europe 45,316 Dead 4,416,778 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions – Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is New Category to Deny Vaccine Deaths FDA had Data Showing 82% – 97% of Pregnant Women Injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Lost Their Babies Before Approving the Shots 44,821 Dead 4,351,483 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Cases of Brain Damage in Children Skyrocket Following COVID-19 Vaccines Recorded Cases of Heart Disease Among Under 40 Years Old Explodes 20,000% After COVID-19 Vaccines Roll Out Killer COVID Vaccines: 4,400% Increase in Deaths Compared to All FDA-Approved Vaccines for Previous 30 Years 4,113 Fetal Deaths in VAERS Following COVID-19 Vaccines Not Including Those Murdered Alive to Develop the Vaccines 43,898 Dead,4,190,493 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Millions of American Lives in Danger as Airline Pilots Suffer Heart Problems from Mandatory COVID Vaccines 43,000 Deaths 4 MILLION Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European European Database of Adverse Reactions 1000% Increase in Vaccine Deaths and Injuries Following Pfizer COVID-19 EUA Vaccine for 5 to 11 Year Olds 42,507 DEAD 3,984,978 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions 17,500% Increase in Heart Disease in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines – This is NOT Rare! 22,000% Increase in Deaths following COVID Vaccines for Adults Over 50 as FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for this Age Group COVID-19 Vaccine Massacre: 68,000% Increase in Strokes, 44,000% Increase in Heart Disease, 6,800% Increase in Deaths Over Non-COVID Vaccines Moderna Seeks Approval from FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) to Start Injecting Children Under 6 with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines 41,834 DEAD 3.9 Million Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database as U.S. Military Deaths Soar 1100% The Thousands of Fetal Deaths Recorded After COVID-19 Vaccines that Nobody Wants to Report and that Facebook is Trying Hard to Censor 65,615 Deaths Now Reported in Europe and the USA Following COVID-19 Vaccines – Corporate Media Refuses to Publish this Data 2000% Increase in Fetal Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines but CDC Still Recommends Them for Pregnant Women Official Government Data: Twice as Many Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines in 1 Year as Deaths Following All Vaccines for the Previous 30 Years California Nurse: “I Want People to Know What I Lost to this Vaccine – I am Living a Nightmare, It’s Not Worth it.” German Health Insurance Claims Show 31,254 Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines While Official Government Stats Report Only 2,255 68,000% Increase in Strokes as FDA and HIH Secretly Study Reports of Neurological Injuries After COVID-19 Vaccines 40,000 Deaths Following COVID Shots in European Database as Life Insurance Death Claims Skyrocket 34-Year-Old Canadian Father Drops Dead in Front of His Daughters After COVID-19 Vaccine 6-Year-Old Minnesota Boy Develops Myocarditis And Becomes Severely Injured After Receiving Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Double-Vaccinated 20-Year-Old Florida Model Develops Myocarditis, Suffers Heart Attack And Has Both Legs Amputated Comedian Collapses on Stage During Joke: “I’m vaxxed, double vaxxed, boosted, and Jesus loves me most” GENOCIDE! Military Medical Whistleblowers Reveal Miscarriages, Birth Defects, and Infertility Rates Exploded in 2021 Following COVID Vaccines Government VAERS Data Reveal 15,600% Increase in Heart Disease Among Under 30 Year-Olds Following COVID-19 Vaccination COVID-19 Vaxxed Olympic Gold Medalist Dies at 51 but Media Calls Him “Anti-Vaxxer” Over 1 Million Deaths and Injuries Following COVID “Vaccines” Reported in VAERS as Second Year of “Experimental Use Authorization” Begins 2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020 Actor Bob Saget “Dies Suddenly” 1 Month After Receiving COVID Booster Shot Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs Year 2021 was America’s Holocaust: Unprecedented Lives Destroyed by Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines” One Year Anniversary of President Trump Forcing the FDA to give Emergency Use Authorization to the Pfizer Shot Registered Nurse Suffers Pericarditis from Pfizer Shot – Put in Hospital Section for Vaccine Injured as She was 7th Patient Admitted That Day for Heart Issues Following COVID Shots #RealNotRare New Website for COVID-19 Vaccine Injured German Study Finds ZERO COVID-19 Deaths in Healthy Children but the Children are Now Dying from the Vaccine 666 Cases of Heart Disease in 12 to 17-Year-Olds After COVID Shots – Less than 2 Cases Per Year Following All Vaccines for Past 30+ Years 7-Year-Old Girl Has Stroke and Brain Hemorrhage 7 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Shot Vaccine Cult Exposed by Government’s Own Data: More than 50% of ALL Vaccine Adverse Reactions Reported for Past 30+ Years Have Occurred in Past 11 Months Following COVID-19 Shots A List Of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving a COVID-19 Shot Fully Vaccinated Pro-Vaccine Canadian Senator Dead at the Age of 56 Bill Gates Charged with Murder for COVID-19 Vaccine Death in India’s High Court – Death Penalty Sought Pfizer’s War on Children Invades Canada and Israel as COVID Shots Begin to be Injected Into 5 to 11 Year Olds Families of South Korea’s COVID Vaccine Victims Mourn Loved Ones During Mass Memorial Service Vaccinated Doctors are Dying and Unvaccinated Doctors are Quitting or Being Fired: Who will Run the Hospitals? The Genocide of American Seniors Continues: 8 Dead in Fully-Vaccinated Connecticut Nursing Home Parents in NY Take to the Streets to Warn Ignorant Parents Injecting Their Children with Pfizer Shots as Injuries Among 5 to 11 Year Olds Now Being Reported Parents Sacrifice Hundreds of Thousands of Children Ages 5 to 11 to the COVID-19 Vaccine Gods This Weekend Cardiologist Medical Doctor who Wanted to Punch Anti-Vaxxers in the Face DEAD After COVID Booster Shot Texas Church Injects Young Children with COVID Shot in Halloween Celebration – Christian Churches Now Working with the CDC to Abuse and Murder Children Grieving Mother Who Threatened Health Impact News for Publishing Daughter’s Death following COVID-19 Shot Now Goes Public Do You Have Blood on Your Hands? Tens of Thousands of Children Age 5 to 11 Injected with Gene Therapy Shots 41 Year Old Florida Man Who Cursed Anti-Vaxxers Found Dead in His Home by Neighbors After Second COVID-19 Pfizer Shot 12-Year-Old In Germany Dies 2 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 12-Year-Old in Thailand In ICU After Heart Problems Caused By The Pfizer Shot Whistleblower Reveals Fraud in Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials as 5 to 11-Year-Olds Begin to be Injected – Vaccine Deaths and Injuries to Follow Doctors and COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Testify in Washington D.C. to Crimes Against Humanity – CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci are No Shows UK Stats Show 82% of COVID-19 Deaths and 66% of Hospitalizations were Among Fully Vaccinated for Past Month Fully Vaccinated are Suffering Far Higher Rates of Infection than the Unvaccinated, and It is Getting Worse White House To “Quickly” Vaccinate 28 Million Children Age 5-11 as Deaths and Injuries Continue to Increase among 12 to 19-Year-Olds Who Received a COVID-19 Shot Evidence Clearly Shows Deaths are Increasing Worldwide After COVID-19 Shots – Major Labor Shortages Loom As Deaths and Injuries to Teens Increase After COVID-19 Shots Pfizer Asks FDA for Emergency Authorization to Inject 5 to 11-Year-Olds Post COVID-19 Injections: The Dead Don’t Speak, but Those with Crippling Injuries Issue Warnings Denver Policeman Crippled After Mandatory Pfizer Shot – Are Law Enforcement the Key to Resisting Medical Tyranny? 1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots but Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get the Shot Study: COVID-19 Vaccines INCREASE Deaths and Hospitalizations from COVID-19 Based on Analysis of Most-Vaccinated Countries Whistleblower Lawsuit! Government Medicare Data Shows 48,465 DEAD Following COVID Shots – Remdesivir Drug has 25% Death Rate! Mockers of Anti-Vaxxers Continue to Die After Taking a COVID-19 Injection STUDY: Government’s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines Local Detroit TV Asks for Stories of Unvaxxed Dying from COVID – Gets over 180K Responses of Vaccine Injured and Dead Instead Teens 50X More Likely to Have Heart Disease After COVID Shots than All Other FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 Combined – CDC Admits True but Still Recommends It Besides Fetal Deaths, Breastfeeding Babies are Dying and becoming Sick following Mothers’ COVID Shots Military Members are Dying and Suffering Crippling Effects from COVID Vaccinations CDC: Teens Injected with COVID Shots have 7.5 X More Deaths, 15 X More Disabilities, 44 X More Hospitalizations than All FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 This is probably the key to everything. For the Vaxxed, for the Unvaxxed. Here is an explanation of the natural and synthetic parasites we are facing, and a guide to the three things you need to do to protect yourself and your family. I do not believe the vaccine is an irreversible step. NOTES: mRNA is too expensive to make. In 2018 a mRNA treatment cost $1 million and now only 2-3 years later they have it for billions of people for only $30 per dose? She says it doesn't make sense. She shows a short German video about Cancer as a parasitical infection. Questions Dr Lee Merritt asked herself: Why are cancers bursting out after the vax? Why does autoimmune disease respond to anti parasitical? Why do THEY (Fauci & others) hate antiparasiticals? Why can't we find mRNA's in these vaxxines? 18 labs around the country can NOT find mRNA's inside the vaxxines. Parasites & cancer under the microscope look identical. Shows Karen Kingstons work where they couldn't make a biological bioweapon work so used a synthetic nanoparticle smart hydrogel which IS the real spike protein. With this stuff in the body and 5G turned on it binds with the ACE-2 pathway and people get sick. Dose the population & control disease outbreak with external wavelength (5G). The best thing we can do right now is take the antiparasiticals. Mother parasite laying eggs. She gives off a hormone that keep the eggs unhatched but if she dies the eggs hatch. Specific time cycles to do the 3 day cycles. (28 minute mark) Start with a SHORT CYCLE of 3 days on & 5 days off. Gradually lengthen your cycle (Watch for a reaction). 2 months minimum. Once you can get to 3 days on & one month off you are on MAINTENANCE. In summary, parasites are at the heart of this. She like Chlorine Dioxide but if you tell anyone to take it you could go to jail. Check out her site THE MEDICAL REBEL as she has a simple guide on Chlorine Dioxide. https://drleemerritt.com/ Use at least 2 drugs for the cycles. Dr Lee Merritt uses NITAZOXANIDE & FENBENDAZOLE. NITAZOXANIDE (Alinia) 500mg twice daily for 3 days. Gut parasites (It takes out hydra (A fresh water parasite). Super duper stuff that gets rid of 85% tape worms in 3 days. FENBENDAZOLE (Panacur C) cycle- Gets into the brain & cysts)- 750mg daily for 3 days. CHLOROQUINE HYDROXYCLORIQUINE IVERMECTIN CHLORINE DIOXIDE. Source: The Medical Rebel rumble channel

Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) is a rare event that occurs in adults whose hearts suddenly stop pumping, causing sudden cardiac arrest and possibly death. SADS is a loosely defined umbrella term for a series of cardiac syndromes that cause sudden cardiac arrest and possibly death. Some of these syndromes are the result of structural problems in the heart, while others may be the result of irregularities within the electrical channels. Sudden loss of consciousness or death often occurs during physical exercise or emotional upset. Young people with a particular family history are being urged to get their hearts screened even if they are fit and healthy, as they could be at risk of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS). The most common SADS conditions include genetic arrhythmia syndromes such as long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), and Brugada syndrome. Globalist Klaus Schwab declares unvaccinated people to be a threat to humanity WEF globalist Klaus Schwab declares unvaccinated people to be a threat to humanity. Several dozen heads of the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Economic Forum (WEF), and various other globalist bodies have declared that the “Great Reset” needs to include the establishment of a global “pandemic” treaty to ensure that all humans are “vaccinated” in accordance with government edicts. WEF head Klaus Schwab, who looks an awful lot like an aged Heinrich Himmler of the Nazi SS, says humans who refuse to go along with the plan are a threat to everyone else. He, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and many of the other usual suspects all agree. These international “leaders” signed on to a letter that says the next phase of the plan-demic transition into a New World Order necessitates that the world’s social engineers and societal architects “build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations.” The letter goes on to declare the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) as the “biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s,” adding that there will definitely be “other pandemics and other major health emergencies” in the years to come. “No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone,” the letter adds. “The question is not if, but when. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly co-ordinated fashion. The Covid-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.” Chinese virus “vaccines” are the first piece of the Mark of the Beast Schwab stated just a few weeks ago that he believes “nobody will be safe” unless “everybody is vaccinated.” It does not matter if a “vaccine” is experimental and still undergoing clinical trials, which is the case for all Chinese virus vaccines currently being distributed. If the government says you should get it, then you have to get it, Schwab contends. The other signatories have essentially declared that they believe the same thing. All injections, no matter their purpose or the risks involved, must be taken by all humanity in order for everyone to feel “safe” against scary germs from China or elsewhere. This will bring about a “public good” that will fulfill the tenets of the New World Order as long planned by the secret societies, and as delineated on the Georgia Guide-Stones, in the Noahide laws, and in other key deep state texts that function as blueprints for a future totalitarian world. The Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plan-demic is just one piece of this much larger agenda, which involves injecting all of humanity with the first piece of the Mark of the Beast. Once the vaccine “software” is installed, more components will be added later to bring about total and absolute worship of the “beast.” Nobody will be able to buy or sell anything without first being “vaccinated.” By agreeing to get vaccinated, people are giving their worship and allegiance to the New World Order beast system known as Western “medicine,” which is forever enslaving them through lies and deception. “The main goal of this treaty would be to foster an all of government and all of society approach, strengthening national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics,” the letter further reads. “This includes greatly enhancing international co-operation to improve, for example, alert systems, data-sharing, research and local, regional and global production and distribution of medical and public health counter-measures such as vaccines, medicines, diagnostics and personal protective equipment.” Bill Gates played a big role in developing Mark of the Beast “vaccines” for global control and Vaccine Alliance, the headquarters of which is located in Geneva, Switzerland, a widely recognized locale of deep state activity, is another creation of Bill and Melinda Gates. It is located right next door to the World Health Organization (WHO) headquarters, and is considered to be a public-private partnership – “[t]he public part being WHO, plus a number of developing countries,” Koenig notes. Other private partners to GAVI include pharmaceutical giants Johnson & Johnson (J&J), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck & Co., and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Not Everyone in Germany is on board with Gates’ plan, including Dr. Reiner Füllmich, co-founder of the Corona Commission, a consortium of medical doctors, virologists, immunologists, lawyers and university professors. Dr. Füllmich is concerned that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines from the likes of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna may contain hidden nanoparticles that could be accessible via electromagnetic radiation such as the kind released by 5G and soon-to-be 6G. We already know that Gates and Co. has been busy working on “vaccine” technologies that will be paired with microchips and other new world order paraphernalia for global control. It is entirely within the realm of possibility that such technology is already fully developed and hidden within the “remedies” being offered for the Chinese virus. Switzerland is already using such a technology that comes with a built-in, all-electronic identification platform. The Swiss government has reportedly outsourced management of its Agenda ID2020 program to the private sector, meaning large corporations will be in charge of handling the data. At some point, the “vaccines” offered by the likes of Bill Gates will openly contain this technology. For now, the deep state wants us all to think that people are simply getting “vaccinated” for Chinese germs, including with secret vaccines hidden within Chinese virus “test kits.” Gates has already openly admitted that the plan is to have every person on the planet – except himself, of course – vaccinated for the Chinese virus. All roughly seven billion people will also get an ID chip inserted into their bodies, which will help the elitists better manage their global “herd.” “With an electromagnetic field and with 5G / 6G EM-waves allowing inputs and access of data in your body – the control of each individual is almost complete,” warns Koenig. “The ‘almost’ refers to the planned access to your brainwaves.” This is a centralized general electronic data collection of every citizen to which every government agency, police – and possibly also the private sector would have access. It covers all that is known about an individual citizen, now up to 200 points of in formation and possibly more as time goes on, from your bank account to your shopping habits, health records (vaccination records, of course), your political inclinations, and probably even your dating habits and other entries into your private sphere. Agenda ID2020 was designed by Bill Gates as part of the “vaccination package”. It is backed by the Rockefeller Foundation, Accenture, the WEF and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, now simply called the Vaccine Alliance), also a Gates creation (2001), with HQ in Geneva, Switzerland. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html Once you see this you'll have no faith in these people again! The system-serving airheads that should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity like most politicians, oligarchs, globalists and most medias. So many innocent people of all age groups have died or been severely injured for life after listening to the advice of Hollywood celebrities, talk show hosts and politicians regarding the vaccine for covid-19. It’s right that medical ethics should be highly scrutinized, especially in cases like the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out where the process has been accelerated. However, it’s important not to mix up the atrocities of the past with current debates about medicine and policy. Imai et al. (1) have characterized yet another variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, this one originating in Brazil. The good news is that it appears that vaccines currently available are still expected to provide protection against this variant. However, what about the next variant, one we have not seen yet? Will we still be protected? In 1859, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species (2), in which he outlined the principles of natural selection and survival of the fittest. The world presently has the unwelcome opportunity to see the principles of evolution as enumerated by Darwin play out in real time, in the interactions of the human population with SARS-CoV-2. The world could have easily skipped this unpleasant lesson, had there not been such large numbers of the human population unwilling to be vaccinated against this disease. SARS-CoV-2 has shown that it can mutate into many variants of the original agent (3). An unvaccinated pool of individuals provides a reservoir for the virus to continue to grow and multiply, and therefore more opportunities for such variants to emerge. When this occurs within a background of a largely vaccinated population, natural selection will favor a variant that is resistant to the vaccine. Reference: Imai S, et al. (2000) Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature 403(6771):795-800 Significance Since SARS-CoV-2 emerged in China, it has spread rapidly around the world. Effective vaccines and therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2−induced disease (coronavirus disease 2019;COVID-19) are urgently needed. We found that SARS-CoV-2 isolates replicate efficiently in the lungs of Syrian hamsters and cause severe pathological lesions in the lungs of these animals similar to commonly reported imaging features of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2−infected hamsters mounted neutralizing antibody responses and were protected against rechallenge with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, passive transfer of convalescent serum to naïve hamsters inhibited virus replication in their lungs. Syrian hamsters are a useful small animal model for the evaluation of vaccines, immunotherapies, and antiviral drugs. Abstract At the end of 2019, a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SARS-CoV-2) was detected in Wuhan, China, that spread rapidly around the world, with severe consequences for human health and the global economy. Here, we assessed the replicative ability and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 isolates in Syrian hamsters. SARS-CoV-2 isolates replicated efficiently in the lungs of hamsters, causing severe pathological lung lesions following intranasal infection. In addition, microcomputed tomographic imaging revealed severe lung injury that shared characteristics with SARS-CoV-2−infected human lung, including severe, bilateral, peripherally distributed, multilobular ground glass opacity, and regions of lung consolidation. SARS-CoV-2−infected hamsters mounted neutralizing antibody responses and were protected against subsequent rechallenge with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, passive transfer of convalescent serum to naïve hamsters efficiently suppressed the replication of the virus in the lungs even when the serum was administrated 2 d postinfection of the serum-treated hamsters. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that this Syrian hamster model will be useful for understanding SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and testing vaccines and antiviral drugs. Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. There have now been more deaths and vaccine side effects reported during the past 20 months to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines than there have been for the entire previous 30 years for all FDA-approved vaccines before the Emergency Use Authorization of the COVID-19 shots in December of 2020. (834,124 cases, 9,278 deaths – source.) 46,999 Deaths and 4,731,833 Injuries in EudraVigilance The European (EEA and non-EEA countries) database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, verified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and they are now reporting 46,999 fatalities, and 4,731,833 injuries following injections of five experimental COVID-19 shots: COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414) COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) COVID-19 VACCINE NOVAVAX (NVX-COV2373) From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (2,143,362) are serious injuries. “Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.” A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results. Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.* Here is the summary data through July 30, 2022. Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 22,191 deaths and 2,448,297 injuries to 30/07/2022 72,801 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 315 deaths 84,773 Cardiac disorders incl. 3,205 deaths 768 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 69 deaths 31,480 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 17 deaths 3,122 Endocrine disorders incl. 12 deaths 35,427 Eye disorders incl. 57 deaths 172,416 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 887 deaths 628,578 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 6,073 deaths 2,795 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 126 deaths 26,839 Immune system disorders incl. 140 deaths 164,955 Infections and infestations incl. 2,300 deaths 43,540 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 504 deaths 58,107 Investigations incl. 608 deaths 15,362 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 389 deaths 274,956 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 314 deaths 2,852 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 269 deaths 376,478 Nervous system disorders incl. 2,369 deaths 3,350 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 84 deaths 319 Product issues incl. 4 deaths 42,571 Psychiatric disorders incl. 250 deaths 8,846 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 332 deaths 102,925 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 9 deaths 99,625 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 2,361 deaths 106,932 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 203 deaths 6,403 Social circumstances incl. 28 deaths 26,452 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 283 deaths 55,625 Vascular disorders incl. 983 deaths Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine SPIKEVAX/mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 12,285 deaths and 782,763 injuries to 30/07/2022 20,959 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 140 deaths 27,417 Cardiac disorders incl. 1,351 deaths 244 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 15 deaths 9,266 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 8 deaths 819 Endocrine disorders incl. 6 deaths 10,432 Eye disorders incl. 41 deaths 61,275 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 467 deaths 206,650 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 3,942 deaths 1,041 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 66 deaths 8,808 Immune system disorders incl. 43 deaths 34,547 Infections and infestations incl. 1,123 deaths 11,502 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 236 deaths 17,404 Investigations incl. 409 deaths 6,277 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 291 deaths 97,363 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 249 deaths 954 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 105 deaths 128,358 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,185 deaths 1,089 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 12 deaths 127 Product issues incl. 3 deaths 12,948 Psychiatric disorders incl. 198 deaths 4,108 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 236 deaths 21,794 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 9 deaths 31,925 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,303 deaths 40,979 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 110 deaths 3,143 Social circumstances incl. 45 deaths 7,090 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 224 deaths 16,244 Vascular disorders incl. 468 deaths Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ Astra Zeneca: 9,427 deaths and 1,328,069 injuries to 30/07/2022 15,427 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 335 deaths 23,779 Cardiac disorders incl. 991 deaths 281 Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 11 deaths 14,975 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 8 deaths 834 Endocrine disorders incl. 7 deaths 22,260 Eye disorders incl. 33 deaths 119,238 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 501 deaths 357,237 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,198 deaths 1,202 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 84 deaths 6,727 Immune system disorders incl. 47 deaths 58,172 Infections and infestations incl. 800 deaths 15,172 Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 232 deaths 32,384 Investigations incl. 226 deaths 14,713 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 150 deaths 191,884 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 197 deaths 915 Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 55 deaths 263,649 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,356 deaths 718 Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 23 deaths 207 Product issues incl. 1 death 23,695 Psychiatric disorders incl. 84 deaths 4,860 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 101 deaths 18,374 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths 46,318 Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,254 deaths 58,025 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 77 deaths 2,440 Social circumstances incl. 11 deaths 3,147 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 43 deaths 31,436 Vascular disorders incl. 599 deaths Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 3,096 deaths and 169,472 injuries to 30/07/2022 1,687 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 69 deaths 3,734 Cardiac disorders incl. 258 deaths 59 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 3 deaths 1,846 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths 153 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths 2,223 Eye disorders incl. 16 deaths 11,562 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 123 deaths 46,545 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 858 deaths 212 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 22 deaths 793 Immune system disorders incl. 12 deaths 14,808 Infections and infestations incl. 261 deaths 1,594 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 37 deaths 7,694 Investigations incl. 164 deaths 1,064 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 84 deaths 21,229 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 71 deaths 148 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 12 deaths 29,060 Nervous system disorders incl. 298 deaths 126 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death 35 Product issues 2,483 Psychiatric disorders incl. 35 deaths 722 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 50 deaths 4,066 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths 5,970 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 390 deaths 5,188 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 16 deaths 690 Social circumstances incl. 7 deaths 1,201 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 101 deaths 4,580 Vascular disorders incl. 197 deaths Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine NUVAXOVID(NVX-COV2373) from Novavax: 0 deaths and 3,096 injuries to 30/07/2022 72 Blood and lymphatic system disorders 182 Cardiac disorders 1 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders 42 Ear and labyrinth disorders 1 Endocrine disorders 60 Eye disorders 225 Gastrointestinal disorders 727 General disorders and administration site conditions 3 Hepatobiliary disorders 27 Immune system disorders 170 Infections and infestations 28 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications 83 Investigations 17 Metabolism and nutrition disorders 416 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders 1 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) 577 Nervous system disorders 2 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions 1 Product issues 49 Psychiatric disorders 19 Renal and urinary disorders 58 Reproductive system and breast disorders 165 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders 207 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders 5 Social circumstances 26 Surgical and medical procedures 68 Vascular disorders https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us In this week's edition of the Covid Q&A, we look at the impact unvaccinated people are having on the pandemic. In hopes of making this very confusing time just a little less so, each week Bloomberg Prognosis is picking one question sent in by readers and putting it to experts in the field. This week's question comes to us from Robert in Northridge, California. Robert asks: I've heard that the longer we have unvaccinated people around, the likelier it is that a new Covid variant will develop that resists vaccines. Is this true? The number of unvaccinated Americans is certainly a major public health concern. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 25% of U.S. adults are still unvaccinated, and many are clustered in regions where inoculation rates are especially low. Those clusters can easily become hot spots because they give the virus so many vulnerable hosts to attack. Indeed, that’s what we’ve seen recently as cases skyrocketed in especially undervaccinated states like Louisiana and Arkansas. As Christopher Martin, a professor of public health at West Virginia University, explains it, these undervaccinated pockets create more opportunity for the virus to mutate. “Large numbers of unvaccinated people do make variants more likely,” he says. The virus that causes Covid-19 replicates only when inside a human host, and it does so by hijacking our cellular machinery to make more copies of itself instead of more copies of human cells. But that process is messy, and mistakes in the genetic code occur frequently as the virus copies itself. Those mistakes often result in mutations that create slightly different versions of the invading pathogen. “If any one of these random errors confers an advantage to that virus, such as making it more contagious like delta, that variant can quickly become the dominant one circulating in the population,” says Martin. Martin explains that because our world is so interconnected, variants can spread quickly. The delta version, for example, was first identified in India in late 2020 and in the U.S in early May (though it was likely here earlier). By July it was accounting for 80% of new U.S. Covid cases. Even as delta drives the current surge in the U.S., there are four other variants scientists are concerned about. “More are to be expected so long as the virus is circulating widely,” says Martin. And though the coronavirus does appear to be infecting vaccinated people as well in greater numbers than we expected, the unvaccinated are still far more likely to contract and spread the disease. “Each of us remains at risk so long as there are large numbers of unvaccinated people anywhere in the world.” US is split between the vaccinated and unvaccinated – and deaths and hospitalizations reflect this divide In recent weeks, one piece of data has gotten a lot of attention: 99.5% of all the people dying from COVID-19 in the U.S. are unvaccinated. We are two researchers who work in public health and study immunity, viruses and other microbes. Since the start of the pandemic, public health experts have been concerned about what might happen if large sections of the U.S. population, for whatever reason, did not get vaccinated. Over the past few weeks, the answer to that question is starting to emerge. ‘Two Americas’ of vaccination As of mid-July 2021, the U.S. has fully vaccinated more than 160 million people – just under 50% of the population – against COVID-19. Despite a surplus of available vaccines, in recent weeks the rate of vaccination has slowed substantially. In early April, health workers administered roughly 4 million new vaccines daily. Today, that number is about 450,000 doses a day. As people sought vaccines over the past few months, the U.S. has split into what Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is calling “two Americas” – one of the vaccinated population and one of the unvaccinated population. These two Americas are divided geographically and in most cases along political lines. Vaccination rates will continue to rise, albeit slowly, as rural areas get better access to vaccines and messaging persuades some vaccine-hesitant people to get the shot. But according to survey data from late June and early July, more than 10% of adults 18 or older say they are probably not or definitely not going to get a coronavirus vaccine, with another 5% saying they are unsure. It seems likely there will be a large unvaccinated population for the time being. Which America is safer? The vaccines themselves are nothing short of remarkable in their effectiveness at protecting against COVID-19. Unvaccinated people, by comparison, are extremely susceptible to the coronavirus, particularly to the delta variant and the data on deaths and hospitalizations show this discrepancy clearly. On July 16, 2021, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky revealed that 99.5% of recent U.S. deaths from COVID-19 were of unvaccinated people. “Those deaths were preventable with a simple, safe shot,” she said. In Early July, Fauci said that 99.2% of people who died recently were unvaccinated. In the state of Maryland, every patient who died from COVID-19 in June was unvaccinated. In her July 16 statement, Walensky also said that 97% of current COVID-19 hospitalizations are of unvaccinated people. An earlier analysis done by The Associated Press found that 98.9% of all hospitalized COVID-19 patients in May were unvaccinated. The director of the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services recently stated that all new hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Los Angeles were unvaccinated. A tale of two states It is hard to find data about overall cases among unvaccinated compared with vaccinated individuals. This results partly from the CDC’s transition in May 2021 to focusing on hospitalizations of COVID-19 vaccine recipients rather than cases. But one way to get at this data is to compare two states with large differences in vaccination rates. As the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 surges across the U.S., one can observe the consequences of this split into a vaccinated and unvaccinated America in real time. In the state of Missouri, only 40% of people are vaccinated. In some counties within Missouri, as few as 14.7% of the residents are vaccinated. Not surprisingly, the state has seen a surge in COVID-19 cases through the middle of July, with 2,000 to 3,000 new cases per day. The rate of spread is also increasing. Already, some hospitals are running out of ventilators and intensive care beds. Contrast this with Massachusetts, where 63% of people are fully vaccinated. Though the state is also seeing an increase in cases, total new infections numbered only around 200 to 300 per day. The number of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Massachusetts is also down 95% since January 2021. As of July 20, 2021, Missouri had 1,357 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, almost 13 times more than the 106 patients in Massachusetts. This is despite Missouri’s having a slightly smaller population that is much more dispersed. Does it matter if people stay unvaccinated? Ultimately, with a large portion of the U.S. population still unvaccinated, COVID-19 is not going to disappear in the near future. The U.S. will continue to see outbreaks of the virus in communities with low vaccine uptake. Even if people in these undervaccinated areas rush to get shots when outbreaks happen, it takes about a month for vaccination to produce strong immunity. As long as SARS-CoV-2 is circulating in the U.S., unvaccinated people will continue to experience the full, dangerous clinical effects of COVID–19. But in addition, while the virus spreads among the unvaccinated, it will also continue spreading at a low level to vaccinated individuals. Though most of those infections will not progress to severe COVID-19, according to the CDC, as of mid-July more than 5,000 vaccinated people, mostly over 65 years old, had been hospitalized and 1,000 had died. These numbers are of course sad, but they pale in comparison to hospitalizations and deaths among the unvaccinated population. The vaccines are doing exactly what they were designed to do: prevent severe COVID-19 with amazing efficiency. With vaccines free and widely available, for most people in the U.S. it is a choice: Do you want to be part of the unvaccinated America or the vaccinated one? Artist covering one eye with 666 Illuminati can be flashed in public by puppet ? https://rumble.com/v28ziyu-artist-covering-one-eye-with-666-illuminati-can-be-flashed-in-public-by-pup.html Hand signs of the Illuminati can be flashed in public by puppet world leaders and celebrities while the unsuspecting masses remain ignorant. Like Illuminati symbols, only Illuminati insiders are aware of the true meanings hidden behind the signs, hand gestures or semaphores. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, but lose his soul? Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now. https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html We're on the verge of creating autonomous weapons that can kill without any help from humans. Thousands of experts are concerned about this - and the latest campaign effort against this tech is a chilling video demonstrating the kind of future we're heading for. In the Slaughterbots short, which we've embedded below, swarms of AI-controlled drones carry out strikes on thousands of unprepared victims with targeted precision. What makes the clip so scary is that the scenario is entirely plausible. The video starts with a spectacular press event where the technology is unveiled for the first time. The miniature drones are able to take out "the bad guys" – whoever they happen to be – without any collateral damage, nuclear weapons, or troops on the ground. All the drone bots need is a profile: age, sex, fitness, uniform, and ethnicity. Sinclair's Soldiers in New Media War on Media a video that showcased news anchors https://rumble.com/v28zjlc-sinclairs-soldiers-in-new-media-war-on-media-a-video-that-showcased-news-an.html This video did not go unnoticed. It became part of an effort by a media watch dog group to stifle Sinclair’s attempts to acquire even more local television stations. Timothy Burke himself was not pleased with this weaponizing of what he himself called his “dumb video”. In fact, Sinclair Broadcast Group, owner or operator of nearly 200 television stations in the U.S., would be forcing its news anchors to record a promo about “the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction, a rate far higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, when the survey was conducted. Sixteen percent of the survey respondents had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the vaccination program. Whole banking system is a scam and fractional lending is just part of the problem ? https://rumble.com/v2a45g0-whole-banking-system-is-a-scam-and-fractional-lending-is-just-part-of-the-p.html Understand The Concept He believes that if the concept of the banking is not understood, then the banks are broken. Godfrey named a Fractional Reserve Banking system as a legalized fraud, as banks are able to lend money they don’t actually have. Godfrey thinks that the bank doesn’t have money, and still, they earn and branded it as a criminal scandal, which has been going on for quite a long period. As if that is not enough, there is a political swear, and most of the problems start in politics and central bank, which are part of the same political system. On artificial printing of money, which has been going since long. He stated that the central banks fix the rate of interest, but there is no cost of value for money. The retail banks are only manipulating and that the central banks are manipulating the interest rates. When banks broke out due to their own incompetence, taxpayers pick up the tab. In short, he branded the banks as fraudulent and a scam. New World Order Plan To Control Secret Evidence Revealed Death UN 21 Agenda U.S.A. https://rumble.com/v2bivd0-new-world-order-plan-to-control-secret-evidence-revealed-death-un-21-agenda.html Speaker Pelosi's said her laptop had over 18,000+ documents and over 368,000+ pages of emails that were uploaded to who? or hacked by who? before shy got back to her office during the Jan. 6 insurrection. Riley June Williams, 22 was found guilty of six federal counts in November of 2022. Democrats woman of house wearing all white at state of the new world order speech rather than Republicans with red shoe lace who are the true saviors of the new world order and other civil liberties. A laptop stolen from the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the U.S. Capitol attack has not been recovered from the home or car of a Pennsylvania woman accused of helping steal it, the woman’s lawyer said Tuesday. Yes its still missing or sold to who ? A Organ Donor Card Will Get You Killed Very Fast As A Doctors Will Sell You 4 Money https://rumble.com/v2auj9m-a-organ-donor-card-will-get-you-killed-very-fast-as-a-doctors-will-sell-you.html You are worth more money to me if you are dead for your body parts to sell on the black market and organ harvesting is a rampant trade in human organs, involving collusion between organized criminals and corrupt doctors, police, jails, government and medical administration staff. We dive into the body trade and see the ways it operates and the risks involved for the desperate people at both ends of the deal, in what is an unregulated and often perilous market. Biden Admin. Sale Girls 11 to 14 Age To Sex Trade 4 Illegals Arrive On Ghost Flights! https://rumble.com/v2anh4g-biden-admin.-sale-girls-11-to-14-age-to-sex-trade-4-illegals-arrive-on-ghos.html Government officials say that secret flights on a variety of factors, including (Over 20,000 missing children so far) because of air space restrictions and weather conditions, and that no attempt is made to hide their arrival (a lie). The more fundamental concern expressed by politicians who keep talking about “ghost flights the Biden administration sex traders and pedophile pickers look at the unattended and or unaccompanied girl 11 to 14 and some boys so no one will look for them, for the secret flights at night only to sell to sex slave traders in u.s.a. biden admin doesn’t want media attention on illegal immigration flights, its open border policies, or the results of those policies. How do we know? A security officer just said so, in an sex explosive video of secretive, dark-of-night flights transporting illegal immigrants to various points at night only throughout the U.S.A. What is Martial law in the US ? Habeas corpus ? Insurrection Act of 1807 ? NWO ? https://rumble.com/v2cfl0c-what-is-martial-law-in-the-us-habeas-corpus-insurrection-act-of-1807-nwo-.html Martial Law, Gun Confiscation and FEMA Death Camps Coming Soon ? As of Jan 4, 2023, the Insurrection Act of 1807 still applies in limiting a US President's ability under Title 10 to federalize National Guard troops for martial law purposes. Federal Emergency Management Agency Death Camp's Purchase 30,000 Guillotines https://rumble.com/v2cfd3c-federal-emergency-management-agency-death-camps-purchase-30000-guillotines.html Executive Orders associated with FEMADC that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Why Did the U.S. Government Recently Purchase 30,000 Guillotines? The use of guillotines for “governmental purposes” was lobbied for and passed in the U.S. Congress The information we received is that 15,000 are currently stored in Georgia and 15,000 in Montana Are the beheadings by Muslim's and Others today meant to desensitize us against U.S. Government beheadings in the future? Rex 84 FEMADC’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America and A Police State America. https://rumble.com/v2cf4yu-rex-84-femadcs-blueprint-for-martial-law-in-america-and-a-police-state-amer.html F.E.M.A.D.C. (Federal Emergency Management Agency Death Camp's) is a cover for a secret "continuity of government" plan in case the American people ever rebelled, that was exposed publicly by Congressman Jack Brooks. It is designed to give all control of government and states over to the president and FEMADC, suspend the constitution. Readiness Exercise 1984 (Rex 84) was an armed forces exercise conducted on behalf of the United States federal government to test our military's ability to detain large numbers of American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency. The military exercise anticipated civil disturbances, major demonstrations and strikes that would affect continuity of government. Pedophile Bill Gates Is Lying To You On Vaccine Patent Protection # WO2020060606A1 https://rumble.com/v2bvqos-pedophile-bill-gates-is-lying-to-you-on-vaccine-patent-protection-wo2020060.html The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (brand name: Comirnaty) was granted full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in August 2021 for people ages 16 and older. It was the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization. For the primary series: two shots, 4 to 8 weeks apart.1 The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 3 weeks (or 21 days) after the first dose; Moderna COVID-19 vaccine 4 weeks (or 28 days) after the first dose. The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute. Orwellian Dystopia Both Side's Are Wrong Answer To Extremism Isn’t More Extremism https://rumble.com/v2bngfk-orwellian-dystopia-both-sides-are-wrong-answer-to-extremism-isnt-more-extre.html America’s left and right are radicalizing each other, and the precedents from overseas are deeply unsettling. It’s all politics. And it still is, for those who really listen close. It’s why we need to flip the script and tell the real story of what happened in 1948 and 1964. I also believe America needs to echo, once again, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream and “look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” That’s what made America great…and will make America great again. It’s known as “The Big Switch.” That’s when Southern Democrat politicians converted to Republicanism and refashioned the G.O.P. into a racist political party. Orwell's "1984" has been quoted left and right, for years, but the reality that we currently live in has never resembled the dystopia that the author describes in his best-known novel as much as it does today. We are voluntarily giving up our privacy. We are forced to use it as a currency. That has never been the case before, but today it is. COVID-19 Blood and Non Vaccines Blood and Secret Pedophile's Blood Bank U.S.A. https://rumble.com/v2dye2c-covid-19-blood-and-non-vaccines-blood-and-secret-pedophiles-blood-bank-u.s..html Blood Feasting Pedophiles, Parasitic Monsters Literally and Predatory Feeding Off the 9.6 Million Children Gone Missing Each Year Around the World… Top Secret “Pedophile” has reverberated throughout America. But beneath our anger and revulsion, a fundamental question pulsates: Are those who abuse their positions of trust to prey upon children—a category certainly not limited to those in religious orders—sick … or are they evil? We need the answer to that fundamental question. Because, without the truth, we cannot act. And until we act, nothing will change. Global child sex trafficking networks generate huge profits, run by the world’s most powerful individuals. A 2014 International Labor Organization report estimates that two-thirds of the annual profits from forced labor come from sexual slavery that amounts to $99 billion USD each year. And of that $99 billion, most is produced off the blood, sweat, tears, and flesh of helpless underage child sex slaves caught up in global trafficking rings operated by this same diabolical global elite. COVID-19 Vaccines Will Kill You? Animation What Happens If You Get Coronavirus Effect https://rumble.com/v2dt6zk-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-you-animation-what-happens-if-you-get-coronavir.html No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect” An independent analysis of the accumulated Yellow Card data, finally released 18 months after the first FOI request, shows unequivocal safety signals linking the mRNA vaccines to serious damage to the lymph system, the heart, and female reproduction 'Health regulator failing to keep public protected from mRNA shots' IN the UK, three Covid-19 vaccines - AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna (MO) - have been used in a nationwide inoculation programmed aimed at preventing harm from the so-called SARS-CoV2 virus. Vladimir Putin Intercepts Adrenochrome Shipment Headed For Hollywood United States https://rumble.com/v2czvsg-vladimir-putin-intercepts-adrenochrome-shipment-headed-for-hollywood-united.html Adrenochrome is a simple molecule that most undergraduate chemistry students could synthesize in a lab, he said in a July 30, 2020, phone interview with Lead Stories. Taking it from living humans makes no sense, he said, since a child's adrenal gland would be unlikely to yield more than a half of a milligram, even if there were a process for extraction of it from the gland and purification to remove tissue. He said a cow's adrenal gland, easily obtained from any butcher, would be much bigger and bovine adrenochrome is identical to that found in humans, if there were a process to extract adrenochrome from the organ. CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html In 1990, a failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least 18 ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. How the CIA Turned Us onto LSD and Heroin Secrets of America's False War on Drugs. Through in-depth interviews with academic researchers, historians, journalists, former federal agents, and drug dealers, America's Fake War on Drugs tells true tales of how, for instance, the CIA and Department of Defense helped to introduce LSD to Americans in the 1950s. "The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back," Lappé tells Nick Gillespie in a wide-ranging conversation about the longest war the U.S. government has fought. "With that supply they began a [secret mind-control] program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved." In-Depth Plant-Based Covid-19 Vaccine People Testing's Now-You Will Eat Your Shot https://rumble.com/v2hftq4-in-depth-plant-based-covid-19-vaccine-people-testings-now-you-will-eat-your.html Anti-GMO forces target New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) despite similarities to conventional crops For years, critics of GMOs have focused on the idea that modern technologies have allowed plant breeders to take genetic material from one species and add it to another—adding ‘foreign genes’, they call it. These transgenic crosses are responsible for most of the GMO crops that dominate US farmland. But they’ve also offered a rallying point for critics, who’ve built a deceptive narrative around the idea that these “Frankenfoods” should be feared and shunned by consumers. U.S. Government Is Selling Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us - Its Not From Mexico https://rumble.com/v2giyy1-u.s.-government-is-selling-fentanyl-laced-w-xylazine-to-kill-us-its-not-fro.html America Is Largest Drug Cartels In The World and Fentanyl Alone or Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us is a potent synthetic opioid drug approved by and sold by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an analgesic (pain relief) and anesthetic. It is approximately 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin as an analgesic. Illicitly manufactured, fentanyl is added to heroin, disguising it as highly potent heroin, so users don’t realize that the heroin they’re purchasing may contain fentanyl. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was originally developed as an analgesic – or painkiller – for surgery. It has a specific chemical structure with multiple areas that can be modified, often illicitly, to form related compounds with marked differences in potency. Fentanyl’s chemical backbone (the structure in the center) has multiple areas (the colored circles) that can be substituted with different functional groups (the colored boxes around the edges) to change its potency. Sanctuary Cities And Sanctuary States And Federal Government In U.S.A. For Sale ? https://rumble.com/v2n4l0m-sanctuary-cities-and-sanctuary-states-and-federal-government-in-u.s.a.-for-.html Felons, Illegals And MS13 Welcome Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in USA have been there for long, known for protecting undocumented immigrants in USA, but do they really face a threat from anyone winning the election? Donald Trump’s victory in the US Presidential Elections has led to a surge across the world with the kind of words he has been saying publicly or the agendas he has propagated till date. He might be a clear winner but still has a lot of resistance on his so called would be plan for his era as the US President ahead. 600 Billion Dollars Poison Ingredient Making Your Food Toxic To Eat Processed Food https://rumble.com/v2mesq8-600-billion-dollars-poison-ingredient-making-your-food-toxic-to-eat-process.html Nina deserves a lot more accreditation on this video, she was one of the first people to shed light on the problems with seed oils and the history of how they came to be. Top Ten Toxic Food Ingredients in Processed Food - Any food that has been canned, dehydrated, or had chemicals added to it is a processed food, and these foods make up about 60 percent of the average American diet. - Most of us don't think of the food we eat as poison, but some of the ingredients commonly found in processed foods can be considered toxic. By "toxic," I mean chemicals or highly processed ingredients that aren't good for you or can cause harm to your health. I'm talking about refined grains, trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, and all the other artificial junk you can't even pronounce on the ingredient lists. Docs Worldwide Warn You to Not Take the Covid 19 Vaccine Will Kill You Dead Soon https://rumble.com/v2ksf52-docs-worldwide-warn-you-to-not-take-the-covid-19-vaccine-will-kill-you-dead.html 32 Doctors from 11 Countries warn against taking the COVID-19 Vaccine. The COVID vaccine has proven NOT SAFE nor EFFECTIVE, it has not been properly tested and should not be given to humans, the animals died! In addition, there is not a clear definition of any new disease for which it can be tested against. There has not been a virus that has been purified or shown to the cause of an illness. There is reason to believe the COVID-19 vaccine is dangerous and deadly. Left Wing Vs. Right Wing Yes Two Wings of the Same Bird All Politicians Are Corruption https://rumble.com/v2k15za-left-wing-vs.-right-wing-yes-two-wings-of-the-same-bird-all-politicians-are.html The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Truth Behind Meat Production Chicken Waffle Beef Burger An Eye-Opening Exploration https://rumble.com/v2mmrac-truth-behind-meat-production-chicken-waffle-beef-burger-an-eye-opening-expl.html Narrated by Oscar-nominee James Cromwell, this powerful film takes viewers on an eye-opening exploration behind the closed doors of the nation's largest industrial farms, hatcheries, and slaughter plants -- revealing the often-unseen journey that animals make from Farm to Fridge. If this documentary moves you, please take a moment to consider if these animals lives are worth taking for merely taste. Thinking about going vegan? The Truth About the Meat Industry What is left out of our food labels? Behind the cow industry are disturbing secrets you are not supposed to know. Supermarket beef has become an industrialized, unnatural product laced with lies beyond the labels. What actually happens to that meat before it reaches grocery store shelves? In this blog I’ll unveil the dirty truth behind the cattle slaughter process everyone needs to hear. Lab-Grown And Real Human Meat Was FDA Approved Cannibalism A Sprit Cooking https://rumble.com/v2mnkmi-lab-grown-and-real-human-meat-was-fda-approved-cannibalism-a-sprit-cooking.html There is something deeply disquieting about cannibalism. Motives and technicalities do not matter; eating human flesh is now universally considered revolting, whatever the circumstances. However, if we trust a long line of anthropologists and ethnographers, this has not always been the case in all parts of the world and is therefore not self-evident. Stripped of all cultural context and psychological connotations and in purely detached terms, the act of cannibalising a corpse might be considered a victimless crime, the victim of the act being a lifeless body destined to decay anyway. And yet, cannibalism is instinctively perceived in virtually all cultures today as grisly violence and, more than that, a violation of all that makes us human. It is probably this perception that led some scholars to question whether human beings could ever have engaged in such practices, except in the most wretched conditions. Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby And Young Kids Too Rejuvenating Potion https://rumble.com/v2q0z7u-pedophiles-eating-alive-and-aborted-baby-and-young-kids-too-rejuvenating-po.html Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs. Which is Worse? Planned Parenthood Is Largest Food Suppliers Human Meat In The World Today. "You Are What You Eat." Most of us have likely heard this saying before and are familiar with its simple and sensible meaning. When we were younger, this adage taught us (hopefully) to take care of what we put into our bodies because the food we eat can have a direct affect on our health as a whole. Selling Human Meat Per Planned Parenthood Rules All Sell At Cost/Lost For Non-Profit Organization. Gates from Hell - Like you Never Knew Him (Bill Gates) Before ? Corbett Report - W0W https://rumble.com/v2afwv2-gates-from-hell-like-you-never-knew-him-bill-gates-before-corbett-report-w0.html There can be no doubt that Bill Gates has worn many hats on his remarkable journey from his early life as the privileged son of a Seattle-area power couple to his current status as one of the richest and most influential people on the planet. But, as we have seen in our exploration of Gates' rise as unelected global health czar and population control advocate, the question of who Bill Gates really is is no mere philosophical pursuit. Today we will attempt to answer that question as we examine the motives, the ideology, and the connections of this man who has been so instrumental in shaping the post-corona virus world. Pedophile and A Pizza Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Evidence ** GRAPHIC ** https://rumble.com/v2bbfv2-pedophile-and-a-pizza-secret-human-trafficking-and-child-sex-ring-evidence-.html CIA Director Pompeo Oversees Capture Of UN Pedophile Who Leaked Video Of Hillary Clinton Killing Child (True ?) What is the real world evidence and sources for these words that I've seen shared so much? “hotdog” = boy “pizza” = girl “cheese” = little girl “pasta” = little boy “ice cream” = male prostitute “walnut” = person of color “map” = semen “sauce” = orgy - So I searching online for any evidence that "pizza," "hotdogs," "cheese," or "pasta" are code words used by pedophiles. Found nothing, yet this "fact" has been repeated in virtually every post about Pizzagate. What's the source? Of course it's possible that the only Pedophile using these words and their kid sex friends. It may be their own private language. Podesta’s email account was hijacked and the hackers took his entire private library of emails. This sucked hard for Podesta because the hackers had tons of high ranking-sensitive information. From October through November 20,000+ pages of emails were uploaded to wiki-leaks.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (brand name: Comirnaty) was granted full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in August 2021 for people ages 16 and older. It was the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization. For the primary series: two shots, 4 to 8 weeks apart.1 The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 3 weeks (or 21 days) after the first dose; Moderna COVID-19 vaccine 4 weeks (or 28 days) after the first dose. The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute. Microsoft Patent - Bill Gates - Patent Description: "Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data" - Patent #: WO2020060606A1 - WO = World Order? - 2020 = 2020 - 060606 = 666 (Number of the Beast) This patent seems to be created for establishing the relationship between the global Crypto-currency, the One World Cashless Society, and a body device ( Covid 19/21 Vaccine and RFID microchip and or quantum dot tattoo or hydrogel or another like-solution? ) in order to use a cashless payment system? Surely sounds related to the Mark of the Beast and the coming Beast System of Revelation. In December researchers at MIT, under the supervision of (Bill) Gates, have developed exactly this “brand of the Beast” in the form of quantum dot tags that fluoresce after they are injected during a vaccination. Quantum dots are small, semiconducting nanoparticles, in the range of 2 to 10 nanometers. The tags are incorporated in a Band-Aid-like “tattoo” composed of sugar-based microneedles that dissolve into the skin. As the needles dissolve they deliver the vaccine and leave a grid pattern under skin, a bar code-like tattoo that determines your future. This grid contains an invisible record of your medical history. Instead of ink, your vital details are written in quantum dots, tiny semiconducting crystals that reflect light, that glow under infrared light. With this technology (Bill) Gates can embed vaccines and medical records directly into the skin. The ink is only visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter. The technology would enable instant tracking and access to a person’s medical history. Thousands of Child Rape Photos Traded Out of Bill Gates’ Mansion “They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.” –Bill Gates Summary: Bill Gates finds himself under scrutiny as people who are very close to him turn out to be making money from pedophilia Gates Foundation are not going to comment on this incident. The ‘brand’ would be hurt. Distancing itself would be wise, but to dissociate from the crime would not be trivial. The amusing thing — not that child abuse is in any way amusing — is that he actually uses Google (not Microsoft) at Gates’ home.”We already wrote many articles about how Bill Gates gets children addicted to malware (like a drug dealer), but his staff goes further by trading pedophilia out of Gates’ own home. The amusing thing — not that child abuse is in any way amusing — is that he actually uses Google (not Microsoft) at Gates’ home. The British press has this to say: has this to say An engineer employed at the home of Bill and Melinda Gates has been charged with possession of child porn after he was discovered to have more than 6,000 images depicting rape and sexual abuse. Rick Allen Jones, 51, of Seattle, allegedly had thousands of images stashed on his home computer, according to court documents this week. Gates employee sentenced for child pornography collection Seattle man admits to possessing child molestation video, sentenced to 90 days in jail A Seattle man previously employed as an engineer at Bill and Melinda Gates’ home, who was caught with a 6,000-image child pornography collection, won’t see prison time for that offense. Charged in late December, Rick Allen Jones admitted he’d been collecting child rape videos and photos for a decade before police intervened. Jones quietly pleaded guilty to related charges on Friday and was sentenced to 90 days in King County Jail, as well as two years of probation. Jones is now required to register as a sex offender and to stay away from children unless certain conditions are met. Pleading guilty, Jones admitted to possessing child pornography showing the sexual abuse of a boy. He also admitted to failing to report the child pornography. Jones, 52, was first contacted by police at the Microsoft founder’s estate while working for the billionaire couple in March 2014. Jones drew investigators’ attention in late 2013 after sharing a suspicious photo through Google's email service. The photo captured the sexual exploitation of two pre-teen boys. Investigators tracked the image to Jones’ Ballard apartment, which they searched on March 20, 2014. Jones was not there at the time, but investigators learned he was likely working at the Gates’ Medina home. Two detectives drove to the sprawling, lakefront estate and met Jones in the estate security office, according to charging papers. They then interviewed him in a parked SUV. Jones initially claimed he shared child pornography online just once but then admitted he’d been collecting it for years. “Jones said that he had been collecting (child pornography) for about 10 years now and has had an interest in young boys since he himself was a teenager,” a Seattle Police Department detective told the court. Detectives have since reviewed electronics seized from Jones’ apartment. They claimed to have found 6,495 images known to law enforcement to be child pornography, including 133 in which the children abused on camera have been identified by police. Among the images were photos showing the anal rape of an 8- to 10-year-old boy and the rape of an 8- to 10-year-old girl. The charges to which Jones pleaded guilty – child pornography possession, a felony, and failing to report child pornography, a misdemeanor – would ordinarily have meant a three- to nine-month jail term. Prosecutors agreed to recommend a slightly shorter jail term in part because Jones is the caretaker for his ailing mother. Jones was judged to be a low-risk offender following a psychiatric evaluation. Jones is expected to report to King County Jail on July 10. He had not previously been jailed in the matter. The New York Times reported Saturday that the Microsoft co-founder was charmed by Jeffrey Epstein, with whom he met several times after Epstein's release from jail. Billionaire Bill Gates, who has repeatedly minimized his ties toJeffrey Epstein, visited the convicted sex offender multiple times in the years after Epstein was released from prison, according to aNew York Timesinvestigation published Saturday. Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, and Epstein met repeatedly starting in 2011, including at least three times at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, according aTimesreport compiled from interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, photographs, emails and other documents. In one e-mail reviewed by theTimes, Gates told colleagues in 2011 following his first meeting with Epstein, “His lifestyle is very different and kind of intriguing although it would not work for me.” A Gates spokeswoman told theTimesthat the email “was referring only to the unique décor of the Epstein residence,” and his “habit of spontaneously bringing acquaintances in to meet Mr. Gates.” Epstein, who was indicted in July on federal sex trafficking charges and denied bail,committed suicidein August in a federal prison. According to theTimes, Epstein also spoke with the Gates Foundation and JPMorgan on a possible multibillion-dollar global health charitable fund that would have generated enormous fees for Epstein. The fund never came to fruition and Gates' representative said the tech titan and the foundation were unaware that Epstein would have received fees from the project. Bridgitt Arnold, Gates’s spokeswoman, told theNew York Timesthat Gates “regrets” every meeting he had with Epstein. “Bill Gates regrets ever meeting with Epstein and recognizes it was an error in judgment to do so,” Arnold told the newspaper. “Gates recognizes that entertaining Epstein’s ideas related to philanthropy gave Epstein an undeserved platform that was at odds with Gates’s personal values and the values of his foundation.” However, Ronan Farrow’sNew Yorkerinvestigation found that Epstein“directed” a $2 million donation from Gatesto the MIT Media Lab in October 2014 (along with another $5.5 million from investor Leon Black). Epstein was listed as “disqualified” in MIT’s donor database, theNew Yorkerrevealed, yet the Media Lab continued to take his money, marking the donor as anonymous, and even “consulted him about the use of the funds.” “Gates would like a write up on our one science program for tues next week,” Epstein allegedly wrote in an email to Joi Ito, the lab’s director. In an internal email, Ito wrote, “This is a $2M gift from Bill Gates directed by Jeffrey Epstein.” Peter Cohen, the lab’s former Director of Development and Strategy, replied, “For gift recording purposes, we will not be mentioning Jeffrey’s name as the impetus for this gift.” CNBC reported thatEpstein allegedly scored a meeting with Gatesafter aggressively lobbying his business allies to put in a good word for him. According to the report, the Microsoft mogul met with Epstein in New York in 2013 with other wealthy patrons to discuss “growing philanthropy.” After this meeting, Gates reportedly took a ride on Epstein’s plane to meet his family in Florida. TheTimesalso reported that Epstein and Gates were seen in private conversation at a California TED conference in 2011. After Gates’ $2 million donation to MIT in October 2014, the Internet billionaire apparently stopped talking to Epstein, a snub the financier complained about to an acquaintance at the end of that year. However, theTimesalso reported that at least two senior Gates Foundation officials maintained contact with Epstein until late 2017. And Gates was not Epstein’s only Microsoft connection. When Epstein’slast will and testamentwas filed in August—just two days before his jail-cell suicide—the document named Boris Nikolic, a former adviser to Gates and his foundation, as the backup executor to his $577 million estate. Nikolic, a biotech venture capitalist who worked at Harvard, said he was “shocked” to learn he was listed in the will. “I was not consulted in these matters and I have no intent to fulfill these duties, whatsoever,” he said in a statement obtained by Bloomberg. Last month, theNew York PostreportedNikolic formally declinedtaking on the role. According to theTimes, Nikolic was apparently brought into Epstein's orbit through Melanie Walker, a colleague at the Gates Foundation. Walker told theTimesshe had met Epstein in 1992 just after she graduated from college; he told her he could get her a modeling job at Victoria's Secret, the company owned by his only known client, Lex Wexner. Walker later stayed in a Manhattan apartment building owned by Epstein and remained close to him over the years. Editor’s note: This article has been updated to clarify that this research was developed to help avoid preventable deaths in parts of the world where paper or digital systems for storing patients’ vaccination records aren’t available. Many vaccines require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, people may not receive all of the necessary doses. The method is still in an experimental stage and is not being used for any current vaccinations, including Covid-19 vaccines.

You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Video Once you see this you'll have no faith in these people again! The system-serving airheads that should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity like most politicians, oligarchs, globalists and most medias. So many innocent people of all age groups have died or been severely injured for life after listening to the advice of Hollywood celebrities, talk show hosts and politicians regarding the vaccine for covid-19. It’s right that medical ethics should be highly scrutinized, especially in cases like the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out where the process has been accelerated. However, it’s important not to mix up the atrocities of the past with current debates about medicine and policy. Long Covid 19 Bioweapon Created To Make You Sick With Multiple Diseases, And You Will Eventually Die. Some people continue to experience health problems long after having COVID-19. Understand the possible symptoms and risk factors for post-COVID-19 syndrome. Long COVID 19 - 21, also known as Post-COVID Conditions (PCC), is a multisystemic condition characterized by signs, symptoms, and conditions that persist or develop after acute COVID-19 infection. Symptoms can last weeks, months, or even years and can include damage to the brain, heart, kidneys, and lungs. Even people who had no symptoms when they were infected can develop symptoms later. At least 86 million individuals around the world have long COVID, based on a conservative estimated incidence of 10% of infected people and more than 869 million documented COVID-19 cases worldwide. The incidence of Long COVID may be decreasing in the US, with the percentage of participants reporting having new or continuing COVID-19 symptoms dropping to 11% in January 2023. The PCR test isn't even safe! The Scientist/ Creator of the test said it won't work to test C0vid and he said Fauki has no idea what he's doing and for that they killed him! Do you realize yet that they are trying to kill us all? Experts, Scientists, Attorneys & Physician around the world have been speaking out to warn you and save lives. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose by telling you this. Use common sense and critical thinking and do some serious research quick. Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. For the greater good refers to the benefit or betterment of the majority of people, especially at the cost of smaller or individual concerns. It is a general advantage that can only be gained by losing or harming something that is considered less important. Some wars are fought for the greater good. The cutbacks that a company must face will be difficult, but they are for the greater good. The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself. All agree that the C vaccine is not at all a vaccine, but a bioweapon created to make you sick with multiple diseases, and you will eventually die if you continue taking more! They are injecting horrible diseases and other nano particles into your cells that cannot be removed. Once you take it, your life span is drastically reduced and you will become sterile. The masks don't work, social distancing won't work, your chances of long-term healthie are FAR GREATER if you do nothing and take nothing. Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes. They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system. Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious. They have spent millions to put fear in you, nothing you think you know about viruses and bacteria are true, you have been lied to. Every single person being pushing this should be punished for this. Corrupt governments, corps and media are part of the great cover-up and guilty of world genocide. This is the biggest crime ever perpetrated against mankind. It must be exposed before it's too late. No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect” An independent analysis of the accumulated Yellow Card data, finally released 18 months after the first FOI request, shows unequivocal safety signals linking the mRNA vaccines to serious damage to the lymph system, the heart, and female reproduction 'Health regulator failing to keep public protected from mRNA shots' IN the UK, three Covid-19 vaccines - AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna (MO) - have been used in a nationwide inoculation programmed aimed at preventing harm from the so-called SARS-CoV2 virus. Expert Claims Covid Vaccines Will Kill 700 million People Around the World. During an interview with USA Watchdog in June, Dr. David Martin predicted that 700 million people will die worldwide due to the Covid injections. He based his estimation on the World Health Organization's vision of the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ (“DoV”). There appears to be no scientific evidence that the Pfizer, Moderna COVID-19 vaccines will kill miscarriages. Scientists have not found an increased risk for miscarriage among people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine just before and during early pregnancy, and data did not surface "any safety concerns for people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine late in pregnancy or for their babies." Therefore, it can be concluded that vaccines do or do not cause miscarriages.? COVID-19 continues to pose a high risk to pregnant people who contract the virus. Despite this concern, hesitancy surrounding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy remains, write the authors of a preprint article on COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy outcomes. As COVID-19 vaccines become more widely available, some have raised concerns regarding potential links between receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and experiencing miscarriage (also known as spontaneous abortion), and other adverse outcomes. However, miscarriage is a common occurrence – around 10 to 15 percent of all pregnancies in the United States end in miscarriage – and multiple studies have found no increase in miscarriage in persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine. One study team used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) v-safe pregnancy registry, a smartphone-based tool for people in the United States who have received a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants were included if they had received at least one vaccine dose prior to conception or before 20 weeks gestation and did not have a pregnancy loss before 6 weeks gestation – pregnancies lost beyond 20 weeks gestation are considered stillbirths not miscarriages, and 6 weeks gestation is typically the earliest a pregnancy can be detected. Out of 2,456 participants, 165 experienced a spontaneous abortion. The study found that the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion between 6 and 20 weeks gestation was 14.1 percent. Among the study participants, 65 participants were contacted in their first trimester, but could not be reached during their second. To account for this drop-out, the study team conducted a “sensitivity analysis” with the assumption that these 65 participants experienced a spontaneous abortion. In this analysis, the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion rose to 18.8 percent. The study team then used data from historical cohorts to represent the “typical” upper and lower ranges of risk of spontaneous abortion before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. They found that the calculated cumulative risk – both with and without the sensitivity analysis – fell within the expected risk range. A second study also concludes that the COVID-19 vaccine poses no increased risk for miscarriage and bolsters the findings of the prior study with the inclusion of a comparison group. This study used the Vaccine Safety Datalink database, a collaboration between the CDC and nine health systems across the United States. Researchers included individuals who received their first dose of the vaccine within 6 to 19 weeks gestation and assigned each an “index date” to reflect when they entered the study. They then compared this group to a contemporaneous cohort of unvaccinated pregnant individuals to determine the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. The study compared the odds that a participant who had a spontaneous abortion had received a vaccine within 28 days of the event with the odds that a participant who carried a pregnancy to term had the same vaccine criteria. The study team found that, compared to participants with ongoing pregnancies, those who had a spontaneous abortion were not significantly more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine. These studies help prove that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy is not associated with higher rates of miscarriage. Nevertheless, more research is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and combat persistent misinformation. Continued investment and investigation is critical to fighting vaccine hesitancy and preventing the further spread of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed WHO’s DoV vision led to a collaboration in which Bill Gates’ GAVI serves on the leadership council. The Global Vaccine Action Plan (“GVAP”) – endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 – came out of the collaboration. The “leadership” that produced the GVAP are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance, UNICEF, United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the World Health Organization (“WHO”). We previously published an article about Dr. Martin’s interview with USA Watchdog but we feel it’s important to remind readers of the scale of the estimated deaths from the bioweapon that is called a Covid vaccine. The number that might die from Covid injections may have been revealed back in 2011 when WHO announced their “decade of vaccines.” The objective for the decade of vaccination was a population reduction of 15% globally, which would be about 700 million people dead. Some may think this number of deaths is an exaggeration, but Dr. Martin is not the only one who has been raising the alarm. Dr. Robert Young estimated in August 2021 that 500 million people worldwide had already been injured, with potentially 35 million deaths, due to Covid injections. A year later in August 2022, Steve Kirsch estimated a ballpark number of 12 million Covid injection deaths based on an estimate of one death for every 1,000 doses – “we are killing nearly close to 10,000 people every single day,” he wrote. Also in August, Peter Halligan, by piecing together data from a variety of sources, suggested as many as 20 million people worldwide had died from Covid injections, while another 2.2 billion have suffered injuries – implying we are only just getting started. And finally, we have psychopath Bill Gates himself. In 2009 The Guardian reported on the first meeting of the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists including Bill Gates, George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner. “The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease,” The Guardian wrote. And here’s a reminder of what Gates said the following year at TedTalks in 2010 spouting his vision of how to “innovate to zero”: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 per cent.” David Martin, PhD, is an inventor, speaker, author, business executive and futurist. He is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM, an international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. During his hour-long interview in June, Dr. Martin told USA Watchdog that the Covid injections are “bioweapons.” Big Pharma and the government knew it and also knew it would cause massive deaths and permanent injuries. Dr. Martin said: “It’s going to get much worse … It is not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin … The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated … This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.” As to how many will die from Covid injections Dr. Martin said: “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people globally, and that would put the US participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people …There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.” Dr. Martin explained: “The dirty secret is . . . there are a lot of pilots having microvascular and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they are going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack. The problem is we are going to see that exact same phenomenon in the healthcare industry and at a much larger scale. So, we now have, along with the actual problem . . . of people getting sick and people dying, we actually have that targeting the healthcare industry writ large. This means we are going to have nurses and doctors who are going to be among the sick and dead. That also means the sick and the dying are also not going to get care.” On 3 March Dr. Martin filed a lawsuit against Joe Biden. He and his group are suing everybody from President Biden to the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and many others over the deaths and injuries from the Covid-19 bioweapons fraudulently passed off as “vaccines.” He contended that “this is far worse” than the Nuremberg trials of Nazis after WWII and added: “This is organised crime . . . They have hidden behind the immunity shield that absolves them of product liability by naming the delivery of a bioweapon – a vaccination program … This is actually a criminal act. This is an act of domestic terror, and it is an anti-trust violation. This is racketeering. This is old-school racketeering, and it is no different than the mob in the 1920s. This is old-school racketeering for personal gain and profit at the expense of human lives. You need to call it what it is, and it’s organized crime. I would say the Nazis were better than the people who are doing this … The real question is why did American citizens develop a weapon to kill Americans and get paid to do it? That is a morally outrageous question, and, unfortunately, almost no one is asking it.” 8 Ways mRNA COVID Vaccines Can Kill You. Dr Sherri Tenpenny has mapped out ten mechanisms of action of how the mRNA vaccine is going to kill people. She says, “When you inject the mRNA, the Messenger RNA starts to code for the spike protein…the NIH is now fighting with Moderna over patent rights, because you can’t patent anything that’s out in nature, so they had to manipulate the spike protein, in order to be able to patent it and then make an antibody to the spike protein. “Well, this anti-spike protein antibody is deadly. It’s absolutely deadly. And the first three papers I went through, I found that one of the things the spike protein does is it directly attacks lung tissue and breaks it down. “The second thing that it does is it inhibits your M2 macrophages, which are your anti-inflammatory macrophages, so you get cytokine storm and you die. “The third is that when that Messenger RNA goes in and makes an antibody to the spike protein, it binds it loosely, carries it into a cell and causes permanent replication. So it’s like having an “On” button with no “Off” button. You’re constantly making this little piece of protein develop more spike proteins against it, make more destruction. “And then, with this paper that I read last night, of this anti-spike protein, it attacks the astrocytes and the oligodendrocytes, which are two different kinds of cells in your brain. Two different kinds of central nervous system [cells]. It attacks the inner mitochondria membrane, in two different mechanisms and it attacks this neurofilament protein, which are the motor nerves, which suddenly –we’ve seen those people [with strong tremors], it’s because the spike protein antibody is affecting their motor neurons and their central nervous system. “And then the primary, number one symptom that people have after they get this vaccine is debilitating fatigue, that they can’t even function in the main part of their lives. Well, it’s because the spike protein antibody attacks the mitochondria and it attacks the GAD 65, which is the intracellular antigen inside of your mitochondria and it can also attack you pancreas. “If you’re diabetic, it’ll make your diabetes worse. If you’re not diabetic, it can cause you to have diabetes, stiff-person syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, which is what thing that you’re watching [massive tremors]; people not able to walk. “In the experiment that they did, they took different tissue antigens, like skin and lung and all this other stuff and then they dropped the serum that had the antibody all over it. 27 out of 55 of the tissue types reacted adversely to the spike antibody. “So you get this vaccine, you create this antibody, that’s why in the most recent VAERS report that came out this week, 181 deaths, already that have been reported and when you start reading through them, you kind of lay out what these antibodies do, you can see it, right in the VAERS report, what has happened to these people and it’s the anti-spike antibody that’s attacking them and that’s why the most number of deaths occurred about 19 days after the injection, because it takes a while to develop the antibody response. It doesn’t happen just like that. “Unless you have an anaphylactic reaction – probably to the polyethylene glycol– unless you have an immediate reaction to it, the delayed reaction is going to start – it takes a while – I talked to a bunch of epidemiologists in Europe and they said that it takes about 48 weeks to really see the most profound effects of autoimmune disease. “When I found the first four mechanisms of action, I said to a few friends of mine, ‘This is a perfectly-designed kill machine.’ “Perfectly-designed, because – the other thing is with that replicating thing, because with the vaccine, you’re going to see mutants [of COVID]. So now, we’re all talking about the mutants. The one thing they’re not asking these people, who’ve been diagnosed with this mutant strain, is ‘Have you had one of the not-approved vaccines?’ Nobody’s putting that together. “So, yes, 48 weeks – so it’s somewhere between 48 weeks, so it’s about a year and 6 to 7 months and a couple of years into the future. “So, like you were talking about the girl with meningitis vaccine? This is going to be even worse. So people have got to make some serious spiritual decisions about this…Are you going to say, ‘Oh, I want to get the vaccine so I can get on an airplane,’ or ‘So I can go out to eat,’ or I can keep my job.’ That gets a little harder. Or ‘So I can continue in professional school,’ which gets a little bit harder. “People are going to have to start making some really hard spiritual decisions about this.” Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction, a rate far higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, when the survey was conducted. Sixteen percent of the survey respondents had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the vaccination program. The program "appears to have adversely affected the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve in terms of retaining needed experienced personnel," states the report, which was released in late October. The GAO recommended that the Department of Defense (DoD) set up an active surveillance program for vaccine reactions. DoD launched a program in 1998 to inoculate all troops against anthrax. The program was cut back to a few select units in 2000 because of a vaccine shortage due to the manufacturer's difficulty in gaining Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for its operation after a plant renovation. In January 2002 the FDA finally approved the new production system. Last May, DoD announced it would step up the vaccination program again, but the shots would be required only for personnel deployed longer than 15 days in high-risk areas. Nuremberg Code: Directives for Human Experimentation The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide. Read the founding documents of modern medical ethics, The Nuremberg Code, the Declarations of Helsinki and Geneva, and the International Code of Medical Ethics, which articulate a core set of ethical principles to guide human experimentation and clinical care. Nuremberg Code is a 10-point set of rules for the conduct of human experiments articulated in 1947 in the trials of Nazi doctors and bureaucrats convicted of crimes against humanity for their roles in concentration camp experiments. U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - Agent Orange - Yes It's Safe - The Chemical That Destroyed Generations. The U.S. defeated most of the resolutions, arguing that Agent Orange was not a chemical or a biological weapon as it was considered a herbicide and a defoliant and it was used in effort to destroy plant crops and to deprive the enemy of concealment and not meant to target human beings. Agent Orange, mixture of herbicides that U.S. military forces sprayed in Vietnam from 1962 to 1971 during the Vietnam War for the dual purpose of defoliating forest areas that might conceal Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces and destroying crops that might feed the enemy. Agent Orange was a mixture of plant-killing chemicals (herbicides) used by the United States military during the Vietnam War as a defoliant to remove tree cover, destroy crops, and clear vegetation around US bases. About 3 million Americans served in the armed forces in Vietnam and nearby areas. Many of these veterans, as well as other people in the area, were exposed to Agent Orange. Exposure to Agent Orange could have occurred when the chemicals were breathed in, ingested in contaminated food or drinks, or absorbed through the skin. Exposure might have been possible through the eyes or through breaks in the skin, as well. One of the challenges in assessing the health effects of Agent Orange exposure has been determining how much an individual was exposed to (or even what they were exposed to). Very little information on this is available. The Vietnam Memorial lists the names of more than 58,000 Americans who died. However, the wall does not document the names of the 2.8 million U.S. veterans exposed to the deadly chemical Agent Orange, and later died. Let's honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice during war - and because of war. Paraquat Pot: The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical In The 1980s When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. At least 1,000 children in the United States have lost their lives to COVID-19, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to available data as of December 15, a breakdown of 677,393 coronavirus deaths showed 1,005 persons between the ages of 0 and 17. Among those, 319 children between the ages of 0 and 4 had died from the disease. The data set showed 213 kids between the ages of 5 and 11 had died from COVID-19, while 240 children between 12 and 15; and 233 children aged 16 to 17 had succumbed to the virus. The figures reflect COVID-19 cases and deaths reported to the CDC since January 21, 2020. Some U.S. states and territories report statistics without detailed demographic data. The virus is much more likely to kill those in older age groups, with the highest number of deaths in the U.S. being among those aged 85 or older, the same data set showed. 190,983 deaths in the CDC statistics were in that age group. According to the CDC, as many as half of all COVID-19 infections in children may be asymptomatic—higher than older age groups—but they can still get quite ill from it. Potential serious complications include multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), a rare condition in which different body parts become inflamed, including the skin, eyes, brain, heart, kidneys, lungs or gastrointestinal organs. More than 2,300 cases of MIS-C were reported in children aged 5 through 11 from April 2020 to October 2021, the CDC said last month. Currently in the U.S., the only vaccine that has been authorized for children is Pfizer-BioNTech. Those as young as five can get the vaccine. Children 16 or older can get a COVID-19 booster shot. Countries in the European Union started vaccinating children aged 5 to 11 this week as parts of the 27-nation bloc reported a surge in COVID-19 cases over the past months, with fears that cases will continue to skyrocket over the Christmas break. Greece, Italy, Spain and Hungary are some of the countries that have opened vaccine eligibility to younger children aged 5 to 11 as the Omicron variant spreads. The EU approved children aged 5 to 11 for a reduced dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine last month. The new Omicron variant is expected to become dominant in the EU by mid-January. Despite 66.6 percent of the EU being fully vaccinated, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed disappointment on Wednesday that the pandemic would again disrupt Christmas and New Year celebrations. Only days after the Omicron variant was discovered by South African scientists in mid-November, public health experts noted that there had been a marked rise in the number of children being admitted to hospitals with the disease, but cases were "mild." Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 14–23, 2020 Summary What is already known about this topic? Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that occurs rarely after vaccination. What is added by this report? During December 14–23, 2020, monitoring by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System detected 21 cases of anaphylaxis after administration of a reported 1,893,360 first doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (11.1 cases per million doses); 71% of these occurred within 15 minutes of vaccination. What are the implications for public health practice? Locations administering COVID-19 vaccines should adhere to CDC guidance for use of COVID-19 vaccines, including screening recipients for contraindications and precautions, having the necessary supplies available to manage anaphylaxis, implementing the recommended postvaccination observation periods, and immediately treating suspected cases of anaphylaxis with intramuscular injection of epinephrine. Noting that the United States accounts for about one-quarter of global COVID-19 cases and deaths, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the U.S. has “the worst record of any country in the world.” While the U.S. has the most confirmed cases and deaths by a wide margin, it does not have the most in either category on a per-capita basis. Pelosi emphasized the U.S. share of coronavirus-related cases and deaths during a June 28 interview on ABC’s “This Week” in which she argued the Trump administration is not taking the growing outbreak in several U.S. states seriously. “We are 4% of the world’s population,” the Democratic leader told host George Stephanopoulos. “We are 25% of the cases and the deaths, 25%. We have the worst record of any country in the world. And the president says we’re making progress or whatever.” Pelosi got the percentages right, but where the U.S. ranks in dealing with the pandemic depends on how one looks at the numbers. Total Confirmed Cases Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, Drew Hammill, confirmed to FactCheck.org in an email that the congresswoman labeled the U.S. the “worst” based on it “having the most coronavirus deaths and confirmed cases of any country.” According to the University of Oxford-based project Our World in Data, as of June 28, the day Pelosi made her claim, there were 9.95 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide, and 2.51 million, or 25%, of those cases were in the U.S — the most of any nation. The U.S. total was 1.2 million cases more than the second-highest country, Brazil, which had 1.31 million cases as of that day. I AM running through what the Nuremberg code is how the military has crossed the line with the Chemtrails and Flouride in the water parasites being sprayed poisoning the animal live stock poisoning the food with chemical additives and paraquat pot poisoning .. Clear violation of international Law, their time is extremely limited and are being dealt with as we speak. Flying right out of military bases human trafficking out of military bases, Drug and Arms trafficking out of military bases, and underground bunkers cloning underground, cloned military personell, cloned police force, forcing corporate policy on citizens during a war when there is NO LAW during war.. so maybe everyone should start doing there job because if the people have to handle this to save time we will include you all in the same bunch consider you all accomplices and let GOD sort you all out.. Also another reason why it might be in their best interest to get right with GOD. Why is the Nuremberg Code being used to oppose Covid-19 vaccines? As the UK Covid-19 vaccine roll out has gathered pace, and the use of “vaccine passports” continue to be debated, an increasing number of social media users are voicing their opposition to these moves and claiming they are an infringement of their rights under the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical research principles, developed in the wake of Nazi atrocities—specifically the inhumane and often fatal experimentation on human subjects without consent—during World War Two. We spoke to experts in medical ethics, healthcare law and social epidemiology about the Nuremberg Code and whether its principles are applicable to the current vaccine roll out or vaccine passports. We also discussed whether the code is legally binding and the darker links the claims seem to draw between the current pandemic and the Nazi era. What is the Nuremberg Code? The Nuremberg Code was created in 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany, following the trial of a group of Nazi doctors accused of conducting inhumane and often deadly experiments on prisoners of concentration camps without their consent. At the conclusion of what’s also referred to as ‘The Doctors Trial’, 16 people were found guilty. The Nuremberg Code was developed in response to the horrors of this experimentation, with the aim of protecting human subjects in medical research. The Code, and particularly its emphasis on informed consent, has had a profound impact on international human rights law and medical ethics. The Nuremberg Code consists of 10 principles, the first of which being that the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential in any experiment on humans. Other principles include that the experiment should be for the good of society, that all unnecessary physical and mental suffering or injury should be avoided and no experiment should be conducted if there is good reason to believe it may result in death or a disabling injury. They also say that the human subject should be free to exit the experiment if they are suffering, and that the scientist in charge must be prepared to end the experiment if they have good reason to believe it may cause injury, disability or death to the subject if it continues. The Nuremberg Code and Covid-19 vaccines We have seen several examples of posts on social media claiming that Covid-19 vaccines violate the Nuremberg Code because they are somehow “experimental” and, as people receiving the vaccines are not made aware of this, they are unable to give their informed consent. This claim that the Covid-19 vaccines are experimental is simply not true, and something we have corrected multiple times. The three Covid vaccines currently given temporary authorisation for use in the UK have been shown to be safe and effective in large scale clinical trials. Dr Alexis Paton, lecturer in social epidemiology and the sociology of health at Aston University, Birmingham, told Full Fact that the Nuremberg Code is “very specifically about experimentation” and so although its principles would be applicable when discussing clinical vaccine trials, it is no longer relevant once a vaccine has been authorised. She said: “The Nuremberg Code is about the active experimentation on humans, for the most part during some sort of clinical trial of some description. So when we talk about Pfizer or AstraZeneca [vaccines], we’re out of the auspices of the Nuremberg Code because this is a product that has been trialled, with appropriate ethics in place, and has been approved and is now in production and being used globally.” Informed consent is still required for those receiving the Covid-19 or any other vaccine. But Professor Emma Cave, professor of healthcare law at Durham University, explained that the need for this does not come from the Nuremberg Code. She said: “The Nuremberg Code relates to research, where the emphasis of informed consent requirements is on preventing the research participants from being used as a means to an end. “Informed consent for treatment serves a slightly different purpose. It prevents a battery or negligence, and protects the autonomy rights of the patient. So informed consent is doing slightly different things in relation to research and treatment.” Arguments that the vaccines are experimental usually hinge on the fact that data is being collected on any side effects in recipients, although it is normal that authorities continue to monitor the safety of all vaccines once they are approved. Data on the long term protection and safety of the Covid-19 will continue to be collected over the coming years. Dr Julian Sheather, special advisor in ethics and human rights to the British Medical Association, told Full Fact it would be “impossible” and “unethical” to roll out any medical intervention without collecting data on it. “It’s true of all drugs. The same would be true of something like [the anti-depressant] Prozac. There will still be people out there gathering data. Are we going to say that every single drug in circulation is an experiment?” Other claims about the ‘experimental’ nature of the vaccines hinge on the fact they were given temporary authorisation to allow them to be distributed faster (although the vaccines still went through extensive clinical testing) and the fact the vaccines were developed so quickly (thanks in part to extra funding made available and ongoing work from before the pandemic). The Nuremberg Code and vaccine passports At the time of writing, the government has said that people who have had both doses of the vaccine can use the NHS app (separate to the NHS Covid-19 app) to demonstrate proof of vaccination when travelling to another country, if the country requires it. No other firm plans for ‘vaccine passports’ to gain access to certain places or events within the UK have been confirmed by the government, but discussion of their potential use has proved controversial. A number of posts on social media have claimed that vaccine passports are a violation of the Nuremberg Code, on the grounds that if you have to have a vaccine in order to do something like travel or work, you are not actually consenting but are being forced. Professor Cave said the Nuremberg Code was not relevant to vaccine passports. “You could still say it’s unethical or it’s problematic, but not by focusing on the Nuremberg Code. It’s not an experimental product in that context. “If restrictions are applied in relation to those who haven’t been vaccinated against Covid, consideration needs to be taken of the potential impact on people’s ability to choose freely and on the possibility that such a policy might discriminate against some groups within society. “We should be debating these matters, but we need to be accurate about the principles that we’re calling upon and the laws that we’re calling upon when we’re saying whether or not something is justifiable.” Dr Paton told Full Fact: “The Nuremberg Code is all about experimental subjects’ rights and the responsibilities of those doing the experiment. A vaccine passport is a policy document. “It’s not unprecedented either. For example, anyone who has ever travelled to a lot of the countries in Africa knows that you won’t be granted a visa if you don’t have proof of a Yellow Fever vaccination. But that’s not experimentation. That has nothing to do with us being human subjects of a trial of any kind. It’s about the government and politics.” Is following the Nuremberg Code a legal requirement? Although the Nuremberg Code is not relevant in the case of the current vaccine roll out or vaccine passports, there is still the question of whether a government could be forced by law, to halt or alter its vaccine programme if it is found to be in violation of the Code’s principles. Professor Cave told Full Fact: “The Code isn’t and wasn’t legally binding. It’s not legally enforceable, it’s a guideline rather than law. “But it is really important because it’s a blueprint for many of today’s legal and ethical standards, internationally and nationally [...] the Nuremberg Code isn’t legally enforceable in itself, but its legacy has changed the way research is conducted and safeguarded to protect the human rights of research participants.” We’ve seen multiple claims that various groups are attempting to take legal action using the Nuremberg Code over vaccination. Some international claims about this have already been fact checked. One is that a complaint has been filed with the International Criminal Court against the Israeli government, arguing that its vaccination programme is in violation of the Nuremberg Code, although Reuters has recently disproved claims that the court has “accepted” this allegation. Similarly, reports that a Canadian court ruled that anyone who tries to force someone to be vaccinated can be prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code have been debunked. Morally grotesque” It is important to note that the Nuremberg Code is not the only set of ethical guidelines for human experimentation. For example, social media users could have drawn on the more recent Declaration of Helsinki (adopted in 1964, last updated 2013), UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) or the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans (fourth version published 2016) to make similar (albeit also incorrect) claims. But what is specific to the Nuremberg Code is the direct association with the atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War Two, and the emotional response this triggers. Although the social media posts don’t explicitly say it, by evoking the Nuremberg Code to talk about the Covid-19 pandemic, they link the horrors of concentration camps to the current vaccine roll out. Misinformation thrives when feelings are manipulated in this way, as claims which create an emotional response are most likely to be shared. The Nuremberg Code would only be relevant at the research trial stage of a vaccine’s development, not its roll out to the general public. But even then, experts told us they felt it would not be an appropriate link to draw. Dr Paton said: “I think it really does a disservice to people who volunteered to be part of the Covid-19 trials. The Nuremberg Code was developed because of really truly horrific atrocities that we found humans can inflict on other humans. “And to compare volunteers who want to help develop a vaccine, where the risks have been mitigated and they are being closely monitored, with the decisions of Nazi doctors to perform experiments on humans without anaesthetic, without safety, without regard for whether the human subject lived or died, I think is really inappropriate.” Dr Sheather added: “It’s terrible bad faith, to be honest with you. Because the Nuremberg trials were investigations into the most brutal forms of medical violation of human beings in the name of some form of research. These research subjects were tested to death and destruction. “Drawing a link between this final roll out of these vaccines and what the Nazi doctors were doing is morally grotesque.” It’s right that medical ethics should be highly scrutinized, especially in cases like the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out where the process has been accelerated. However, it’s important not to mix up the atrocities of the past with current debates about medicine and policy. What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. Welcome To The New World Order - The Year Zero - The Real Origin of the World - National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? The New World Order is Upon Us - Preserve your liberty by being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. For the greater good refers to the benefit or betterment of the majority of people, especially at the cost of smaller or individual concerns. It is a general advantage that can only be gained by losing or harming something that is considered less important. Some wars are fought for the greater good. The cutbacks that a company must face will be difficult, but they are for the greater good. The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself. From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English the greater good the greater good a general advantage that you can only gain by losing or harming something that is considered less important Some wars are fought for the greater good. great Examples from the Corpus the greater good This, I learned, was standard practice when a customer was about to be sacrificed for the greater good of Salomon. For the greater good of the parish or because he knew something? If an act promotes happiness for the most amount of people, it is good. If it decreases overall happiness, it is bad. The goal of our actions is to create the greatest happiness for the most amount of people. Since everyone’s happiness counts equally, utilitarianism considers maximizing the good from an impartial perspective, meaning that the interests of people close to you should not count higher than those of strangers. To illustrate, Plato imagined an ideal state in which private goods and nuclear families would be relinquished for the sake of the greater good of a harmonious society. Aristotle defined it in terms of a communally shared happiness, whose key constituents were wisdom, virtue and pleasure. World War One poster with the famous phrase "I want you for U. S. Army" (Get Your Covid-19 Shot Now) shows Uncle Sam pointing his finger at the viewer in order to recruit soldiers for the American Army during World War I. The printed phrase "Nearest recruiting station" (Get Your Covid-19 Shot Now) has a blank space below to add the address for enlisting. Parallel Worlds - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Some people who have been infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 can experience long-term effects from their infection, known as Long COVID or Post-COVID Conditions (PCC). Long COVID is broadly defined as signs, symptoms, and conditions that continue or develop after acute COVID-19 infection. This definition of Long COVID was developed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in collaboration with CDC and other partners. People call Long COVID by many names, including Post-COVID Conditions, long-haul COVID, post-acute COVID-19, long-term effects of COVID, and chronic COVID. The term post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection (PASC) is also used to refer to a subset of Long COVID. What You Need to Know Long COVID can include a wide range of ongoing health problems; these conditions can last weeks, months, or years. Long COVID occurs more often in people who had severe COVID-19 illness, but anyone who has been infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 can experience it. People who are not vaccinated against COVID-19 and become infected may have a higher risk of developing Long COVID compared to people who have been vaccinated. People can be reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, multiple times. Each time a person is infected or reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, they have a risk of developing Long COVID. While most people with Long COVID have evidence of infection or COVID-19 illness, in some cases, a person with Long COVID may not have tested positive for the virus or known they were infected. CDC and partners are working to understand more about who experiences Long COVID and why, including whether groups disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 are at higher risk. About Long COVID Long COVID is a wide range of new, returning, or ongoing health problems that people experience after being infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. Most people with COVID-19 get better within a few days to a few weeks after infection, so at least 4 weeks after infection is the start of when Long COVID could first be identified. Anyone who was infected can experience Long COVID. Most people with Long COVID experienced symptoms days after first learning they had COVID-19, but some people who later experienced Long COVID did not know when they got infected. There is no test that determines if your symptoms or condition is due to COVID-19. Long COVID is not one illness. Your healthcare provider considers a diagnosis of Long COVID based on your health history, including if you had a diagnosis of COVID-19 either by a positive test or by symptoms or exposure, as well as based on a health examination. Symptoms People with Long COVID may experience many symptoms. People with Long COVID can have a wide range of symptoms that can last weeks, months, or even years after infection. Sometimes the symptoms can even go away and come back again. For some people, Long COVID can last weeks, months, or years after COVID-19 illness and can sometimes result in disability. Long COVID may not affect everyone the same way. People with Long COVID may experience health problems from different types and combinations of symptoms that may emerge, persist, resolve, and reemerge over different lengths of time. Though most patients’ symptoms slowly improve with time, speaking with your healthcare provider about the symptoms you are experiencing after having COVID-19 could help determine if you might have Long COVID. People who experience Long COVID most commonly report: General symptoms (Not a Comprehensive List) Tiredness or fatigue that interferes with daily life Symptoms that get worse after physical or mental effort (also known as “post-exertional malaise”) Fever Respiratory and heart symptoms Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath Cough Chest pain Fast-beating or pounding heart (also known as heart palpitations) Neurological symptoms Difficulty thinking or concentrating (sometimes referred to as “brain fog”) Headache Sleep problems Dizziness when you stand up (lightheadedness) Pins-and-needles feelings Change in smell or taste Depression or anxiety Digestive symptoms Diarrhea Stomach pain Other symptoms Joint or muscle pain Rash Changes in menstrual cycles Symptoms that are hard to explain and manage Some people with Long COVID have symptoms that are not explained by tests or easy to manage. People with Long COVID may develop or continue to have symptoms that are hard to explain and manage. Clinical evaluations and results of routine blood tests, chest X-rays, and electrocardiograms may be normal. The symptoms are similar to those reported by people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and other poorly understood chronic illnesses that may occur after other infections. People with these unexplained symptoms may be misunderstood by their healthcare providers, which can result in a delay in diagnosis and receiving the appropriate care or treatment. Review these tips to help prepare for a healthcare provider appointment for Long COVID. Health conditions Some people experience new health conditions after COVID-19 illness. Some people, especially those who had severe COVID-19, experience multiorgan effects or autoimmune conditions with symptoms lasting weeks, months, or even years after COVID-19 illness. Multi-organ effects can involve many body systems, including the heart, lung, kidney, skin, and brain. As a result of these effects, people who have had COVID-19 may be more likely to develop new health conditions such as diabetes, heart conditions, blood clots, or neurological conditions compared with people who have not had COVID-19. People experiencing any severe illness may develop health problems People experiencing any severe illness, hospitalization, or treatment may develop problems such as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). PICS refers to the health effects that may begin when a person is in an intensive care unit (ICU), and which may persist after a person returns home. These effects can include muscle weakness, problems with thinking and judgment, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a long-term reaction to a very stressful event. While PICS is not specific to infection with SARS-CoV-2, it may occur and contribute to the person’s experience of Long COVID. For people who experience PICS following a COVID-19 diagnosis, it is difficult to determine whether these health problems are caused by a severe illness, the virus itself, or a combination of both. People More Likely to Develop Long COVID Some people may be more at risk for developing Long COVID. Researchers are working to understand which people or groups of people are more likely to have Long COVID, and why. Studies have shown that some groups of people may be affected more by Long COVID. These are examples and not a comprehensive list of people or groups who might be more at risk than other groups for developing Long COVID: People who have experienced more severe COVID-19 illness, especially those who were hospitalized or needed intensive care. People who had underlying health conditions prior to COVID-19. People who did not get a COVID-19 vaccine. People who experience multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) during or after COVID-19 illness. Health Inequities May Affect Populations at Risk for Long COVID Some people are at increased risk of getting sick from COVID-19 because of where they live or work, or because they can’t get health care. Health inequities may put some people from racial or ethnic minority groups and some people with disabilities at greater risk for developing Long COVID. Scientists are researching some of those factors that may place these communities at higher risk of getting infected or developing Long COVID. Preventing Long COVID The best way to prevent Long COVID is to protect yourself and others from becoming infected. For people who are eligible, CDC recommends staying up to date on COVID-19 vaccination, along with improving ventilation, getting tested for COVID-19 if needed, and seeking treatment for COVID-19 if eligible. Additional preventative measures include avoiding close contact with people who have a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 illness and washing hands or using alcohol-based hand sanitizer. Research suggests that people who get a COVID-19 infection after vaccination are less likely to report Long COVID, compared to people who are unvaccinated. CDC, other federal agencies, and non-federal partners are working to identify further measures to lessen a person’s risk of developing Long COVID. Learn more about protecting yourself and others from COVID-19. Living with Long COVID Living with Long COVID can be hard, especially when there are no immediate answers or solutions. People experiencing Long COVID can seek care from a healthcare provider to come up with a personal medical management plan that can help improve their symptoms and quality of life. Review these tips to help prepare for a healthcare provider appointment for Long COVID. In addition, there are many support groups being organized that can help patients and their caregivers. Although Long COVID appears to be less common in children and adolescents than in adults, long-term effects after COVID-19 do occur in children and adolescents. CDC is using multiple approaches to estimate how many people experience Long COVID. Each approach can provide a piece of the puzzle to give us a better picture of who is experiencing Long COVID. For example, some studies look for the presence of Long COVID based on self-reported symptoms, while others collect symptoms and conditions recorded in medical records. Some studies focus only on people who have been hospitalized, while others include people who were not hospitalized. The estimates for how many people experience Long COVID can be quite different depending on who was included in the study, as well as how and when the study collected information. Estimates of the proportion of people who had COVID-19 that go on to experience Long COVID can vary.

Covid-19 Special How About Getting Vaccinated Against Coronavirus It Will Kill You. No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect” An independent analysis of the accumulated Yellow Card data, finally released 18 months after the first FOI request, shows unequivocal safety signals linking the mRNA vaccines to serious damage to the lymph system, the heart, and female reproduction 'Health regulator failing to keep public protected from mRNA shots' IN the UK, three Covid-19 vaccines - AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna (MO) - have been used in a nationwide inoculation programmed aimed at preventing harm from the so-called SARS-CoV2 virus. Expert Claims Covid Vaccines Will Kill 700 million People Around the World. During an interview with USA Watchdog in June, Dr. David Martin predicted that 700 million people will die worldwide due to the Covid injections. He based his estimation on the World Health Organization's vision of the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ (“DoV”). There appears to be no scientific evidence that the Pfizer, Moderna COVID-19 vaccines will kill miscarriages. Scientists have not found an increased risk for miscarriage among people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine just before and during early pregnancy, and data did not surface "any safety concerns for people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine late in pregnancy or for their babies." Therefore, it can be concluded that vaccines do or do not cause miscarriages.? COVID-19 continues to pose a high risk to pregnant people who contract the virus. Despite this concern, hesitancy surrounding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy remains, write the authors of a preprint article on COVID-19 vaccines and pregnancy outcomes. As COVID-19 vaccines become more widely available, some have raised concerns regarding potential links between receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and experiencing miscarriage (also known as spontaneous abortion), and other adverse outcomes. However, miscarriage is a common occurrence – around 10 to 15 percent of all pregnancies in the United States end in miscarriage – and multiple studies have found no increase in miscarriage in persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine. One study team used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) v-safe pregnancy registry, a smartphone-based tool for people in the United States who have received a COVID-19 vaccine. Participants were included if they had received at least one vaccine dose prior to conception or before 20 weeks gestation and did not have a pregnancy loss before 6 weeks gestation – pregnancies lost beyond 20 weeks gestation are considered stillbirths not miscarriages, and 6 weeks gestation is typically the earliest a pregnancy can be detected. Out of 2,456 participants, 165 experienced a spontaneous abortion. The study found that the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion between 6 and 20 weeks gestation was 14.1 percent. Among the study participants, 65 participants were contacted in their first trimester, but could not be reached during their second. To account for this drop-out, the study team conducted a “sensitivity analysis” with the assumption that these 65 participants experienced a spontaneous abortion. In this analysis, the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion rose to 18.8 percent. The study team then used data from historical cohorts to represent the “typical” upper and lower ranges of risk of spontaneous abortion before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. They found that the calculated cumulative risk – both with and without the sensitivity analysis – fell within the expected risk range. A second study also concludes that the COVID-19 vaccine poses no increased risk for miscarriage and bolsters the findings of the prior study with the inclusion of a comparison group. This study used the Vaccine Safety Datalink database, a collaboration between the CDC and nine health systems across the United States. Researchers included individuals who received their first dose of the vaccine within 6 to 19 weeks gestation and assigned each an “index date” to reflect when they entered the study. They then compared this group to a contemporaneous cohort of unvaccinated pregnant individuals to determine the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. The study compared the odds that a participant who had a spontaneous abortion had received a vaccine within 28 days of the event with the odds that a participant who carried a pregnancy to term had the same vaccine criteria. The study team found that, compared to participants with ongoing pregnancies, those who had a spontaneous abortion were not significantly more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine. These studies help prove that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy is not associated with higher rates of miscarriage. Nevertheless, more research is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and combat persistent misinformation. Continued investment and investigation is critical to fighting vaccine hesitancy and preventing the further spread of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations. WHO’s DoV vision led to a collaboration in which Bill Gates’ GAVI serves on the leadership council. The Global Vaccine Action Plan (“GVAP”) – endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 – came out of the collaboration. The “leadership” that produced the GVAP are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance, UNICEF, United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the World Health Organization (“WHO”). We previously published an article about Dr. Martin’s interview with USA Watchdog but we feel it’s important to remind readers of the scale of the estimated deaths from the bioweapon that is called a Covid vaccine. The number that might die from Covid injections may have been revealed back in 2011 when WHO announced their “decade of vaccines.” The objective for the decade of vaccination was a population reduction of 15% globally, which would be about 700 million people dead. Some may think this number of deaths is an exaggeration, but Dr. Martin is not the only one who has been raising the alarm. Dr. Robert Young estimated in August 2021 that 500 million people worldwide had already been injured, with potentially 35 million deaths, due to Covid injections. A year later in August 2022, Steve Kirsch estimated a ballpark number of 12 million Covid injection deaths based on an estimate of one death for every 1,000 doses – “we are killing nearly close to 10,000 people every single day,” he wrote. Also in August, Peter Halligan, by piecing together data from a variety of sources, suggested as many as 20 million people worldwide had died from Covid injections, while another 2.2 billion have suffered injuries – implying we are only just getting started. And finally, we have psychopath Bill Gates himself. In 2009 The Guardian reported on the first meeting of the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists including Bill Gates, George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner. “The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease,” The Guardian wrote. And here’s a reminder of what Gates said the following year at TedTalks in 2010 spouting his vision of how to “innovate to zero”: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 per cent.” David Martin, PhD, is an inventor, speaker, author, business executive and futurist. He is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM, an international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. During his hour-long interview in June, Dr. Martin told USA Watchdog that the Covid injections are “bioweapons.” Big Pharma and the government knew it and also knew it would cause massive deaths and permanent injuries. Dr. Martin said: “It’s going to get much worse … It is not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin … The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated … This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.” As to how many will die from Covid injections Dr. Martin said: “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people globally, and that would put the US participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people …There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.” Dr. Martin explained: “The dirty secret is . . . there are a lot of pilots having microvascular and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they are going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack. The problem is we are going to see that exact same phenomenon in the healthcare industry and at a much larger scale. So, we now have, along with the actual problem . . . of people getting sick and people dying, we actually have that targeting the healthcare industry writ large. This means we are going to have nurses and doctors who are going to be among the sick and dead. That also means the sick and the dying are also not going to get care.” On 3 March Dr. Martin filed a lawsuit against Joe Biden. He and his group are suing everybody from President Biden to the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and many others over the deaths and injuries from the Covid-19 bioweapons fraudulently passed off as “vaccines.” He contended that “this is far worse” than the Nuremberg trials of Nazis after WWII and added: “This is organised crime . . . They have hidden behind the immunity shield that absolves them of product liability by naming the delivery of a bioweapon – a vaccination program … This is actually a criminal act. This is an act of domestic terror, and it is an anti-trust violation. This is racketeering. This is old-school racketeering, and it is no different than the mob in the 1920s. This is old-school racketeering for personal gain and profit at the expense of human lives. You need to call it what it is, and it’s organized crime. I would say the Nazis were better than the people who are doing this … The real question is why did American citizens develop a weapon to kill Americans and get paid to do it? That is a morally outrageous question, and, unfortunately, almost no one is asking it.” 8 Ways mRNA COVID Vaccines Can Kill You. Dr Sherri Tenpenny has mapped out ten mechanisms of action of how the mRNA vaccine is going to kill people. She says, “When you inject the mRNA, the Messenger RNA starts to code for the spike protein…the NIH is now fighting with Moderna over patent rights, because you can’t patent anything that’s out in nature, so they had to manipulate the spike protein, in order to be able to patent it and then make an antibody to the spike protein. “Well, this anti-spike protein antibody is deadly. It’s absolutely deadly. And the first three papers I went through, I found that one of the things the spike protein does is it directly attacks lung tissue and breaks it down. “The second thing that it does is it inhibits your M2 macrophages, which are your anti-inflammatory macrophages, so you get cytokine storm and you die. “The third is that when that Messenger RNA goes in and makes an antibody to the spike protein, it binds it loosely, carries it into a cell and causes permanent replication. So it’s like having an “On” button with no “Off” button. You’re constantly making this little piece of protein develop more spike proteins against it, make more destruction. “And then, with this paper that I read last night, of this anti-spike protein, it attacks the astrocytes and the oligodendrocytes, which are two different kinds of cells in your brain. Two different kinds of central nervous system [cells]. It attacks the inner mitochondria membrane, in two different mechanisms and it attacks this neurofilament protein, which are the motor nerves, which suddenly –we’ve seen those people [with strong tremors], it’s because the spike protein antibody is affecting their motor neurons and their central nervous system. “And then the primary, number one symptom that people have after they get this vaccine is debilitating fatigue, that they can’t even function in the main part of their lives. Well, it’s because the spike protein antibody attacks the mitochondria and it attacks the GAD 65, which is the intracellular antigen inside of your mitochondria and it can also attack you pancreas. “If you’re diabetic, it’ll make your diabetes worse. If you’re not diabetic, it can cause you to have diabetes, stiff-person syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, which is what thing that you’re watching [massive tremors]; people not able to walk. “In the experiment that they did, they took different tissue antigens, like skin and lung and all this other stuff and then they dropped the serum that had the antibody all over it. 27 out of 55 of the tissue types reacted adversely to the spike antibody. “So you get this vaccine, you create this antibody, that’s why in the most recent VAERS report that came out this week, 181 deaths, already that have been reported and when you start reading through them, you kind of lay out what these antibodies do, you can see it, right in the VAERS report, what has happened to these people and it’s the anti-spike antibody that’s attacking them and that’s why the most number of deaths occurred about 19 days after the injection, because it takes a while to develop the antibody response. It doesn’t happen just like that. “Unless you have an anaphylactic reaction – probably to the polyethylene glycol– unless you have an immediate reaction to it, the delayed reaction is going to start – it takes a while – I talked to a bunch of epidemiologists in Europe and they said that it takes about 48 weeks to really see the most profound effects of autoimmune disease. “When I found the first four mechanisms of action, I said to a few friends of mine, ‘This is a perfectly-designed kill machine.’ “Perfectly-designed, because – the other thing is with that replicating thing, because with the vaccine, you’re going to see mutants [of COVID]. So now, we’re all talking about the mutants. The one thing they’re not asking these people, who’ve been diagnosed with this mutant strain, is ‘Have you had one of the not-approved vaccines?’ Nobody’s putting that together. “So, yes, 48 weeks – so it’s somewhere between 48 weeks, so it’s about a year and 6 to 7 months and a couple of years into the future. “So, like you were talking about the girl with meningitis vaccine? This is going to be even worse. So people have got to make some serious spiritual decisions about this…Are you going to say, ‘Oh, I want to get the vaccine so I can get on an airplane,’ or ‘So I can go out to eat,’ or I can keep my job.’ That gets a little harder. Or ‘So I can continue in professional school,’ which gets a little bit harder. “People are going to have to start making some really hard spiritual decisions about this.” https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Funeral Embalmer: 85% of Dead Bodies Now Have Strange Blood Clots Since COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-outs 80 Canadian Doctors DEAD Following COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates as Death Toll Continues to Rise 4,500 Dead Babies in VAERS From Pregnant Women Injected with COVID-19 Shots, but Florida Only Pulls COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendation for Young Men 32 Young Canadian Doctors “Died Suddenly” in the Past 16 Months While Fully COVID-19 Vaccinated SADS: “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” Explodes as Young and Healthy Adults Die Following COVID Vaccine Mandates 76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines 6 Canadian Medical Doctors Died Within 2 Weeks After 4th COVID Booster Shots for Employees Started at One Hospital 76,253 Dead 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. Injecting Babies with COVID-19 Vaccines: Brain Damage, Seizures, Rashes are Recorded Side Effects in VAERS Official Government Data Record 74,783 Deaths and 5,830,235 Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S. and Europe 45,316 Dead 4,416,778 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions – Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is New Category to Deny Vaccine Deaths FDA had Data Showing 82% – 97% of Pregnant Women Injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Lost Their Babies Before Approving the Shots 44,821 Dead 4,351,483 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Cases of Brain Damage in Children Skyrocket Following COVID-19 Vaccines Recorded Cases of Heart Disease Among Under 40 Years Old Explodes 20,000% After COVID-19 Vaccines Roll Out Killer COVID Vaccines: 4,400% Increase in Deaths Compared to All FDA-Approved Vaccines for Previous 30 Years 4,113 Fetal Deaths in VAERS Following COVID-19 Vaccines Not Including Those Murdered Alive to Develop the Vaccines 43,898 Dead,4,190,493 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions Millions of American Lives in Danger as Airline Pilots Suffer Heart Problems from Mandatory COVID Vaccines 43,000 Deaths 4 MILLION Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European European Database of Adverse Reactions 1000% Increase in Vaccine Deaths and Injuries Following Pfizer COVID-19 EUA Vaccine for 5 to 11 Year Olds 42,507 DEAD 3,984,978 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions 17,500% Increase in Heart Disease in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines – This is NOT Rare! 22,000% Increase in Deaths following COVID Vaccines for Adults Over 50 as FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for this Age Group COVID-19 Vaccine Massacre: 68,000% Increase in Strokes, 44,000% Increase in Heart Disease, 6,800% Increase in Deaths Over Non-COVID Vaccines Moderna Seeks Approval from FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) to Start Injecting Children Under 6 with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines 41,834 DEAD 3.9 Million Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database as U.S. Military Deaths Soar 1100% The Thousands of Fetal Deaths Recorded After COVID-19 Vaccines that Nobody Wants to Report and that Facebook is Trying Hard to Censor 65,615 Deaths Now Reported in Europe and the USA Following COVID-19 Vaccines – Corporate Media Refuses to Publish this Data 2000% Increase in Fetal Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines but CDC Still Recommends Them for Pregnant Women Official Government Data: Twice as Many Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines in 1 Year as Deaths Following All Vaccines for the Previous 30 Years California Nurse: “I Want People to Know What I Lost to this Vaccine – I am Living a Nightmare, It’s Not Worth it.” German Health Insurance Claims Show 31,254 Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccines While Official Government Stats Report Only 2,255 68,000% Increase in Strokes as FDA and HIH Secretly Study Reports of Neurological Injuries After COVID-19 Vaccines 40,000 Deaths Following COVID Shots in European Database as Life Insurance Death Claims Skyrocket 34-Year-Old Canadian Father Drops Dead in Front of His Daughters After COVID-19 Vaccine 6-Year-Old Minnesota Boy Develops Myocarditis And Becomes Severely Injured After Receiving Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Double-Vaccinated 20-Year-Old Florida Model Develops Myocarditis, Suffers Heart Attack And Has Both Legs Amputated Comedian Collapses on Stage During Joke: “I’m vaxxed, double vaxxed, boosted, and Jesus loves me most” GENOCIDE! Military Medical Whistleblowers Reveal Miscarriages, Birth Defects, and Infertility Rates Exploded in 2021 Following COVID Vaccines Government VAERS Data Reveal 15,600% Increase in Heart Disease Among Under 30 Year-Olds Following COVID-19 Vaccination COVID-19 Vaxxed Olympic Gold Medalist Dies at 51 but Media Calls Him “Anti-Vaxxer” Over 1 Million Deaths and Injuries Following COVID “Vaccines” Reported in VAERS as Second Year of “Experimental Use Authorization” Begins 2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020 Actor Bob Saget “Dies Suddenly” 1 Month After Receiving COVID Booster Shot Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs Year 2021 was America’s Holocaust: Unprecedented Lives Destroyed by Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines” One Year Anniversary of President Trump Forcing the FDA to give Emergency Use Authorization to the Pfizer Shot Registered Nurse Suffers Pericarditis from Pfizer Shot – Put in Hospital Section for Vaccine Injured as She was 7th Patient Admitted That Day for Heart Issues Following COVID Shots #RealNotRare New Website for COVID-19 Vaccine Injured German Study Finds ZERO COVID-19 Deaths in Healthy Children but the Children are Now Dying from the Vaccine 666 Cases of Heart Disease in 12 to 17-Year-Olds After COVID Shots – Less than 2 Cases Per Year Following All Vaccines for Past 30+ Years 7-Year-Old Girl Has Stroke and Brain Hemorrhage 7 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Shot Vaccine Cult Exposed by Government’s Own Data: More than 50% of ALL Vaccine Adverse Reactions Reported for Past 30+ Years Have Occurred in Past 11 Months Following COVID-19 Shots A List Of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving a COVID-19 Shot Fully Vaccinated Pro-Vaccine Canadian Senator Dead at the Age of 56 Bill Gates Charged with Murder for COVID-19 Vaccine Death in India’s High Court – Death Penalty Sought Pfizer’s War on Children Invades Canada and Israel as COVID Shots Begin to be Injected Into 5 to 11 Year Olds Families of South Korea’s COVID Vaccine Victims Mourn Loved Ones During Mass Memorial Service Vaccinated Doctors are Dying and Unvaccinated Doctors are Quitting or Being Fired: Who will Run the Hospitals? The Genocide of American Seniors Continues: 8 Dead in Fully-Vaccinated Connecticut Nursing Home Parents in NY Take to the Streets to Warn Ignorant Parents Injecting Their Children with Pfizer Shots as Injuries Among 5 to 11 Year Olds Now Being Reported Parents Sacrifice Hundreds of Thousands of Children Ages 5 to 11 to the COVID-19 Vaccine Gods This Weekend Cardiologist Medical Doctor who Wanted to Punch Anti-Vaxxers in the Face DEAD After COVID Booster Shot Texas Church Injects Young Children with COVID Shot in Halloween Celebration – Christian Churches Now Working with the CDC to Abuse and Murder Children Grieving Mother Who Threatened Health Impact News for Publishing Daughter’s Death following COVID-19 Shot Now Goes Public Do You Have Blood on Your Hands? Tens of Thousands of Children Age 5 to 11 Injected with Gene Therapy Shots 41 Year Old Florida Man Who Cursed Anti-Vaxxers Found Dead in His Home by Neighbors After Second COVID-19 Pfizer Shot 12-Year-Old In Germany Dies 2 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 12-Year-Old in Thailand In ICU After Heart Problems Caused By The Pfizer Shot Whistleblower Reveals Fraud in Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials as 5 to 11-Year-Olds Begin to be Injected – Vaccine Deaths and Injuries to Follow Doctors and COVID-19 Vaccine Injured Testify in Washington D.C. to Crimes Against Humanity – CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci are No Shows UK Stats Show 82% of COVID-19 Deaths and 66% of Hospitalizations were Among Fully Vaccinated for Past Month Fully Vaccinated are Suffering Far Higher Rates of Infection than the Unvaccinated, and It is Getting Worse White House To “Quickly” Vaccinate 28 Million Children Age 5-11 as Deaths and Injuries Continue to Increase among 12 to 19-Year-Olds Who Received a COVID-19 Shot Evidence Clearly Shows Deaths are Increasing Worldwide After COVID-19 Shots – Major Labor Shortages Loom As Deaths and Injuries to Teens Increase After COVID-19 Shots Pfizer Asks FDA for Emergency Authorization to Inject 5 to 11-Year-Olds Post COVID-19 Injections: The Dead Don’t Speak, but Those with Crippling Injuries Issue Warnings Denver Policeman Crippled After Mandatory Pfizer Shot – Are Law Enforcement the Key to Resisting Medical Tyranny? 1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots but Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get the Shot Study: COVID-19 Vaccines INCREASE Deaths and Hospitalizations from COVID-19 Based on Analysis of Most-Vaccinated Countries Whistleblower Lawsuit! Government Medicare Data Shows 48,465 DEAD Following COVID Shots – Remdesivir Drug has 25% Death Rate! Mockers of Anti-Vaxxers Continue to Die After Taking a COVID-19 Injection STUDY: Government’s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines Local Detroit TV Asks for Stories of Unvaxxed Dying from COVID – Gets over 180K Responses of Vaccine Injured and Dead Instead Teens 50X More Likely to Have Heart Disease After COVID Shots than All Other FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 Combined – CDC Admits True but Still Recommends It Besides Fetal Deaths, Breastfeeding Babies are Dying and becoming Sick following Mothers’ COVID Shots Military Members are Dying and Suffering Crippling Effects from COVID Vaccinations CDC: Teens Injected with COVID Shots have 7.5 X More Deaths, 15 X More Disabilities, 44 X More Hospitalizations than All FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 18 U.S.C. § 175 – BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS “[Whoever] knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, [or knowingly assists a foreign state, or attempts, threatens, or conspires], shall be fined or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial federal jurisdiction over an offense under this law committed by or against a national of the United States.” Section 1091 of Title 18, - GENOCIDE United States Code, prohibits genocide whether committed in time of peace or time of war. Genocide is defined in § 1091 and includes [VIOLENT ATTACKS] with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, political, ethnic, racial, or religious group. [VIOLENT ATTACKS] - MURDER AND THREAT OF VIOLENCE Intentional knowing willful collusion aiding and abetting bioengineering COVID lethal bio-weapons, experiments medical and scientific mass killing human beings with mandated known toxic lethal injections, threat of violence and use of force intimidation and coercion to gain compliance. COVID-19 Vaccines Will Kill You? Animation What Happens If You Get Coronavirus Effect https://rumble.com/v2dt6zk-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-you-animation-what-happens-if-you-get-coronavir.html Covid-19 U.S.A. Paid Chinese Scientists For Gain-Of-Function-Research For Bioweapon https://rumble.com/v2dpvnu-covid-19-u.s.a.-paid-chinese-scientists-for-gain-of-function-research-for-b.html The world is witnessing one of the worst pandemics in history. Millions of lives have been lost, major economies have been crippled and large scale destruction has taken place. More than a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, the world is still investigating what led to the outbreak of the deadly virus. Was it an accidental lab leak? Does the virus have a natural origin? Or Is Covid-19 an act of bioterrorism? Ever since the first covid positive case was reported in China's Wuhan, theories around the origin of Covid-19 have multiplied like the virus itself. China’s reluctance to allow in independent investigators muddied the waters even further. The secrecy shrouding the origin of SARS-Cov-2 begs the question - What is China hiding? Was the virus bioengineered? Is Covid-19 a bioweapon? Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction, a rate far higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, when the survey was conducted. Sixteen percent of the survey respondents had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the vaccination program. 44,821 Dead 4,351,483 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions. The European (EEA and non-EEA countries) database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, verified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and they are now reporting 44,821 fatalities, and 4,351,483 injuries following injections of five experimental COVID-19 shots: COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414) COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) COVID-19 VACCINE NOVAVAX (NVX-COV2373) From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,972,105) are serious injuries. “Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.” A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results. Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.* Here is the summary data through May 21, 2022. Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2, Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 21,070 deaths and 2,207,919 injuries to 21/05/2022 67,512 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 303 deaths 78,229 Cardiac disorders incl. 3,061 deaths 694 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 63 deaths 29,164 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 16 deaths 2,801 Endocrine disorders incl. 10 deaths 32,801 Eye disorders incl. 54 deaths 161,894 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 837 deaths 550,894 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 5,821 deaths 2,542 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 121 deaths 24,583 Immune system disorders incl. 134 deaths 123,754 Infections and infestations incl. 2,182 deaths 41,268 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 441 deaths 53,565 Investigations incl. 582 deaths 14,151 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 368 deaths 253,409 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 287 deaths 2,466 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 241 deaths 348,167 Nervous system disorders incl. 2,266 deaths 3,188 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 85 deaths 301 Product issues incl. 4 deaths 39,004 Psychiatric disorders incl. 242 deaths 8,112 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 312 deaths 95,775 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 8 deaths 92,246 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 2,233 deaths 98,876 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 185 deaths 5,415 Social circumstances incl. 27 deaths 25,013 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 251 deaths 52,095 Vascular disorders incl. 936 deaths Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine SPIKEVAX/mRNA-1273 (CX-024414) from Moderna: 11,916 deaths and 720,662 injuries to 21/05/2022 19,456 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 134 deaths 24,903 Cardiac disorders incl. 1,315 deaths 224 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 15 deaths 8,515 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 8 deaths 741 Endocrine disorders incl. 6 deaths 9,632 Eye disorders incl. 36 deaths 57,258 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 451 deaths 190,630 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 3,850 deaths 968 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 64 deaths 8,062 Immune system disorders incl. 39 deaths 31,759 Infections and infestations incl. 1089 deaths 10,916 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 215 deaths 15,827 Investigations incl. 405 deaths 5,813 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 282 deaths 89,472 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 238 deaths 860 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 92 deaths 118,849 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,146 deaths 1,032 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 13 deaths 120 Product issues incl. 3 deaths 11,834 Psychiatric disorders incl. 193 deaths 3,818 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 230 deaths 19,671 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 9 deaths 29,456 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,264 deaths 37,258 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 107 deaths 2,747 Social circumstances incl. 45 deaths 5,716 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 218 deaths 15,125 Vascular disorders incl. 449 deaths Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 8,958 deaths and 1,267,883 injuries to 21/05/2022 14,856 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 320 deaths 23,037 Cardiac disorders incl. 946 deaths 269 Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 10 deaths 14,620 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 7 deaths 784 Endocrine disorders incl. 6 deaths 21,601 Eye disorders incl. 33 deaths 114,466 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 474 deaths 337,830 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,084 deaths 1,154 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 80 deaths 6,407 Immune system disorders incl. 44 deaths 54,461 Infections and infestations incl. 745 deaths 14,617 Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 219 deaths 30,652 Investigations incl. 223 deaths 14,191 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 142 deaths 182,458 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 188 deaths 854 Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 50 deaths 252,545 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,298 deaths 698 Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 22 deaths 205 Product issues incl. 1 death 22,791 Psychiatric disorders incl. 78 deaths 4,703 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 91 deaths 18,099 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths 44,746 Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,200 deaths 56,079 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 77 deaths 2,221 Social circumstances incl. 10 deaths 2,869 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 39 deaths 30,670 Vascular disorders incl. 568 deaths Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 2,877 deaths and 152,918 injuries to 21/05/2022 1,529 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 65 deaths 3,353 Cardiac disorders incl. 244 deaths 55 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths 1,688 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths 135 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths 2,012 Eye disorders incl. 12 deaths 10,769 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 106 deaths 41,462 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 816 deaths 191 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 17 deaths 713 Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths 12,281 Infections and infestations incl. 246 deaths 1,425 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 31 deaths 7,093 Investigations incl. 154 deaths 950 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 77 deaths 19,497 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 63 deaths 123 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 11 deaths 26,795 Nervous system disorders incl. 274 deaths 110 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death 34 Product issues 2,205 Psychiatric disorders incl. 31 deaths 666 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 43 deaths 3,864 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths 5,401 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 358 deaths 4,636 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 13 deaths 546 Social circumstances incl. 7 deaths 1,119 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 96 deaths 4,266 Vascular disorders incl. 188 deaths Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine NUVAXOVID (NVX-COV2373) from Novavax: 0 deaths and 2,101 injuries to 21/05/2022 44 Blood and lymphatic system disorders 116 Cardiac disorders 26 Ear and labyrinth disorders 1 Endocrine disorders 46 Eye disorders 154 Gastrointestinal disorders 463 General disorders and administration site conditions 3 Hepatobiliary disorders 8 Immune system disorders 102 Infections and infestations 19 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications 57 Investigations 13 Metabolism and nutrition disorders 275 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders 2 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) 373 Nervous system disorders 1 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions 1 Product issues 36 Psychiatric disorders 11 Renal and urinary disorders 39 Reproductive system and breast disorders 105 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders 142 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders 3 Social circumstances 9 Surgical and medical procedures 52 Vascular disorders

32 Doctors from 11 Countries warn against taking the COVID-19 Vaccine. The COVID vaccine has proven NOT SAFE nor EFFECTIVE, it has not been properly tested and should not be given to humans, the animals died! In addition, there is not a clear definition of any new disease for which it can be tested against. There has not been a virus that has been purified or shown to the cause of an illness. There is reason to believe the COVID-19 vaccine is dangerous and deadly. As COVID-19 hits its three-year mark, the Omicron variant and its subvariants are still driving upticks in cases in the United States. The good news is that vaccines are still expected to be effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19. In the U.S., infants, children, and adults ages 6 months and older are eligible to be vaccinated, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As the SARS-CoV-2 virus mutates and new variants continue to emerge, it’s important to keep up with how well the vaccines are performing, but it’s also a daunting task, given the flood of information (and misinformation) coming at us from so many directions. We mapped out a comparison of the most prominent COVID-19 vaccines. The Four Vaccines In Use In The U.S.A. Now Pfizer-BioNTech The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (brand name: Comirnaty) was granted full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in August 2021 for people ages 16 and older. Before that, it was the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) back in December 2020, after the company reported that its vaccine was highly effective at preventing symptomatic disease. This is a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, which uses a relatively new technology. It must be stored in freezer-level temperatures, which can make it more difficult to distribute than some other vaccines. Who can get it: Anyone ages 16 and older in the U.S. Infants, children, and teenagers ages 6 months to 15 years are eligible under an EUA. Dosage: For the primary series: two shots, 3-8 weeks apart. Dosages for infants and children are different than those for adults. If you had COVID-19 recently, you might consider delaying your second primary dose or your booster by 3 months from when you started to experience symptoms or (if you had no symptoms) the date of your positive test result. For some people older than 12, especially boys and men between ages 12 and 39, the CDC suggests an eight-week interval between the two shots to reduce the risk of myocarditis, an uncommon side effect (see FDA warnings below). Who can get a booster: Most adults should get an updated Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna bivalent booster at least 2 months after their primary series. Infants as young as 6 months, children, and teenagers are also eligible for the Pfizer bivalent booster. (Children who haven’t had the vaccine yet are now eligible for a Pfizer series that includes two doses of the monovalent vaccine followed by the bivalent booster—and those who have started the series will get the bivalent vaccine as their third dose. Children who have had all three Pfizer primary shots already are not eligible at this time for the updated booster.) The bivalent boosters authorized in August 2022 are designed to protect against disease caused by the original strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5. If you are immunocompromised: Children and teenagers ages 5 to 17 should receive three Pfizer-BioNTech primary doses, including a second dose three weeks after the first, and a third dose four weeks later. Teenagers 12 and older also can get a Pfizer-BioNTech booster shot three months after completing their initial series, and a second booster four weeks after the first. Adults who are immunocompromised can choose between the three available vaccines, following a schedule similar to immunocompromised teens (depending on which vaccine they choose—Pfizer or Moderna are recommended over Johnson & Johnson). More information for immunocompromised individuals is available on the CDC website. Possible side effects: Pain, redness, or swelling at the site where the shot was administered, and/or tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, or nausea throughout the rest of the body. If these side effects occur, they should go away in a few days. A few side effects are serious, but rare. These include anaphylaxis, a severe reaction that is treatable with epinephrine (the drug in Epipens®). FDA warnings: The FDA added a warning label on the mRNA vaccines regarding serious (but rare) cases of inflammation of the heart muscle (myocarditis) and of the outer lining of the heart (pericarditis) in adolescents and young adults, more often occurring after the second dose of an mRNA vaccine. The inflammation, in most cases, gets better on its own without treatment. How it works: It uses mRNA technology, which is a new type of vaccine. It works by sending instructions to host cells in the body for making copies of a spike protein (like the spikes you see sticking out of the coronavirus in pictures). But our cells recognize that this protein doesn’t belong, and the immune system reacts by activating immune cells and producing antibodies. This will prompt the body to recognize and attack the real SARS CoV-2 spike protein if you become exposed to the actual virus. How well it works: When Pfizer-BioNTech applied for FDA authorization for its vaccine in December 2020, its initial Phase 3 clinical data surpassed expectations with 95% efficacy for the prevention of COVID-19, based on an independent analysis by the FDA. Later data on effectiveness (the vaccine's performance when used in the real world) for adults showed that the protection from the mRNA two-dose primary series wanes over time; but booster doses bring the immune system back to robust levels. How well it works against variants: While Pfizer’s primary vaccine was designed to protect against the original SARS CoV-2 virus, the new bivalent (or “updated”) booster is designed to prevent two virus strains, the original one and the Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5. In January, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published a study based on people 12 and older included in North Carolina’s state vaccine registry data. The study found the bivalent vaccine to be 58.7% effective against hospitalization compared to 25% for the monovalent one that preceded it; its effectiveness against infection was 61.8% compared to 24.9% for the monovalent. Scientists noted that this study covered a period when Omicron subvariants BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. were also circulating, which suggests the updated vaccine is more effective against those strains in addition to the ones it was designed to target. Another study in January from the CDC assessed the bivalent vaccine’s effectiveness against the most recent Omicron subvariants, XBB and XBB.1.5, in people who had previously received two to four monovalent vaccine doses, and found it to be similar to how well it worked against BA.5 for at least the first three months after vaccination. The CDC’s study was based on COVID-19 tests performed in the pharmacy, and it found effectiveness against the XBB strains varied by age: in ages 18 to 49, it was 49% against the XBB strains versus 52% against the BA.5 viruses; in ages 50 to 64, it was 40% compared to 43% for BA.5; and in people 65 and older, 43%, compared to 37% for the BA.5 viruses. In November 2022, Pfizer announced that a clinical trial showed levels of neutralizing antibodies in the bivalent booster were fourfold higher in people 55 and older than in people of similar ages who got a monovalent booster, which targeted only the original virus. (Antibodies are known to provide protection against infection or reinfection and severe disease.) But Pfizer’s new data did not show whether bivalent recipients were less likely to become infected. Moderna The FDA granted the Moderna vaccine (brand name: Spikevax) full approval for people 18 and older in January 2022, upgrading the vaccine’s EUA, which was granted in December 2020 (a week after Pfizer-BioNTech). Moderna uses the same mRNA technology as Pfizer-BioNTech and had a similarly high efficacy at preventing symptomatic disease when the companies applied for authorization; it also needs to be stored in freezer-level temperatures. Who can get it: Infants, children, and adults ages 6 months and older in the U.S. Dosage: For the primary series: two shots, 4 to 8 weeks apart. If you had COVID-19 recently, you might consider delaying your second primary dose or your booster by 3 months from when you started to experience symptoms or (if you had no symptoms) the date of your first positive test result. Dosages for children are different than dosages for adults. For some people older than 12, especially boys and men between ages 12 and 39, the CDC suggests an eight-week interval between the two shots to reduce the risk of myocarditis, an uncommon side effect (see FDA warnings below). Who can get the booster: Most adults should get an updated Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna bivalent booster at least five 2 months after their primary Moderna series. Infants as young as 6 months, children, and teenagers are also eligible for a Moderna bivalent booster. Bivalent booster shots authorized in August 2022 are designed to protect against disease caused by the original strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5. If you are immunocompromised: Anyone 18 and older who is moderately or severely immunocompromised should get an additional primary shot (or third dose) of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine 28 days after their second Moderna shot. They will be eligible for a booster shot five months later and can choose either a Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech booster in most cases. Adults with certain immune deficiencies should also get a second Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna booster; immunocompromised teenagers ages 12-17 must get this booster from Pfizer. More information for immunocompromised people is available on the CDC website. Possible side effects: The side effects are similar to Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine: Pain, redness, or swelling at the site where the shot was administered—and/or tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, or nausea throughout the rest of the body. If any of these side effects occur, they should go away in a few days. A few side effects are serious, but rare. These include anaphylaxis, a severe reaction that is treatable with epinephrine (the drug in Epipens®). FDA warnings: The FDA placed a warning label on the Moderna vaccine regarding a “likely association” with reported cases of heart inflammation in young adults. This inflammation may occur in the heart muscle (myocarditis) or in the outer lining of the heart (pericarditis)—it more often occurs after the second dose of an mRNA vaccine. The inflammation, in most cases, gets better on its own without treatment. How it works: Similar to the Pfizer vaccine, this is an mRNA vaccine that sends the body’s cells instructions for making a spike protein that will train the immune system to recognize it. The immune system will then attack the spike protein the next time it sees one (attached to the actual SARS CoV-2 virus). How well it works: Moderna’s initial Phase 3 clinical data in December 2020 was similar to Pfizer-BioNTech’s—at that point, both vaccines showed about 95% efficacy for prevention of COVID-19. Later data on real-world effectiveness for adults showed that the protection from the mRNA two-dose primary series wanes over time, but booster doses bring the immune system back to robust levels. How well it works against variants: Moderna’s bivalent booster was FDA-authorized at the same time as Pfizer’s. It also targets both the original SARS CoV-2 strain and the Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sublineages. In January, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published a study based on people 12 and older included in North Carolina’s state vaccine registry data. The study found the bivalent vaccine to be 58.7% effective against hospitalization compared to 25% for the monovalent one that preceded it; its effectiveness against infection was 61.8% compared to 24.9% for the monovalent. Scientists noted that this study covered a period when Omicron BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. were also circulating, which suggests the updated vaccine is more effective against those strains in addition to the ones it was designed to target. Another study in January from the CDC assessed the bivalent vaccine’s effectiveness against the most recent Omicron subvariants, XBB and XBB.1.5. in people who had previously received two to four monovalent vaccine doses, and found it to be similar to how well it worked against BA.5 for at least the first three months after vaccination. The CDC’s study was based on COVID-19 tests performed in the pharmacy, and it found effectiveness against the XBB strains varied by age: in ages 18 to 49, it was 49% against the XBB strains versus 52% against the BA.5 viruses; in ages 50 to 64, it was 40% compared to 43% for BA.5; and in people 65 and older, 43%, compared to 37% for the BA.5 viruses. Novavax The Novavax vaccine (brand names: Nuvaxovid and Covovax) was the fourth COVID-19 vaccine to be administered in the U.S. This vaccine, which is a protein adjuvant, had a 90% efficacy in its clinical trial, performing almost as well as the mRNA vaccines in their early trials. It is simpler to make than some of the other vaccines and can be stored in a refrigerator, making it easier to distribute. Status: The vaccine was authorized in the U.S. in July 2022 and a booster was announced a few months later in October. Who can get it: People 12 and older. Dosage: 2 doses, 3-8 weeks apart. If you had COVID-19 recently, you might consider delaying your second primary dose or your booster by 3 months from when you started to experience symptoms or (if you had no symptoms) the date of your positive test result. Who can get the booster: The Novavax booster protects against the original SARS CoV-2 virus and may not protect against recent Omicron subvariants. Adults who have not received a booster shot previously may choose to get it six months after completing their primary vaccination if they are unable to receive the bivalent booster for a medical or any other reason. Alternatively, adults are eligible for a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna bivalent booster at least two months after their primary Novavax vaccination, and teenagers ages 12 through 17 must get a Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster. Possible side effects: Injection site tenderness, fatigue, headache, muscle pain. There were rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis (six cases in 40,000 participants) in the clinical trial. How it works: Unlike the mRNA and vector vaccines, this is a protein adjuvant (an adjuvant is an ingredient used to strengthen the immune response). While other vaccines trick the body’s cells into creating parts of the virus that can trigger the immune system, the Novavax vaccine takes a different approach. It contains the spike protein of the coronavirus itself, but formulated as a nanoparticle, which cannot cause disease. When the vaccine is injected, this stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies and T-cell immune responses. How well it works: 90% effective overall against lab-confirmed, symptomatic infection and 100% effective against moderate and severe disease in Phase 3 trial results published in The New England Journal of Medicine in December 2021. While the efficacy was similar among participants from several demographic groups (the study looked at subgroups based on demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, and those at high risk for COVID), efficacy was lower—at about 67%—in Hispanic or Latino participants, as compared to participants who were not Hispanic or Latino. Notably there were few infections among people in the study who were Hispanic or Latino overall (just 8 in the Novavax group and 11 in the placebo group), making these results somewhat difficult to interpret. How well it works on virus variants: The data presented to the FDA was gathered before Omicron or its recent subvariants started to circulate, but the company says it expects to have a vaccine that will protect against the recent Omicron subvariants in 2023. Johnson & Johnson The FDA authorized Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine (brand name: Janssen) in February 2021. Unlike the first two vaccines, this is a carrier, or virus vector, vaccine, a type of vaccine that has been used before for the flu. A one-shot strategy made J&J’s vaccine easier to distribute and administer to people who found it the be the most convenient vaccine to get. But in the spring of 2021, concerns over rare blood clots associated with the vaccine prompted the government to put a pause on it, which was soon lifted. Then, in December the CDC again responded to those concerns by expressing a preference for the Pfizer and Moderna shots. In May, the FDA put new restrictions on who can get the J&J vaccine based on another review of data on the life-threatening clots. Who can get it: Adults 18 and older who specifically request the J&J vaccine or who cannot have the other available vaccines for medical reasons. Dosage: Single shot. Fully effective two weeks after vaccination. Who can get the booster: Anyone who had the J&J primary shot can get a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna bivalent booster at least 2 months later. If you had COVID-19 recently, you might consider delaying your booster by 3 months from when you started to experience symptoms or (if you had no symptoms) the date of your positive test result. If you are immunocompromised: If you got the single J&J shot, you should get a second shot from either Pfizer or Moderna at four weeks, and a booster two months later (Pfizer and Moderna are preferred in most situations). Immunocompromised teenagers and adults ages 12 and older can receive a 2nd booster (4th dose) of an mRNA vaccine at least four months after their first booster. Possible side effects: Pain, redness, swelling in the arm where the shot was administered; tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, nausea throughout the rest of the body. If any of these side effects occur, they should go away in a few days. FDA warnings: In July, the FDA attached a warning to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine after rare cases of the neurological disorder Guillain-Barré syndrome were reported in a small number of vaccination recipients. Most of the cases occurred within 42 days after vaccination. In April 2021, the FDA added a warning label after ending a pause on the vaccine it had recommended “out of an abundance of caution” over an uncommon, but potentially fatal, blood clotting disorder that occurred in a small number of recipients. In December, the FDA updated its fact sheet on the shot to include information about the rare but serious blood clotting disorder called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) that was associated with the vaccine. In May, after another review of available data on this risk, the FDA made a decision to put restrictions on access to the J&J vaccine. How it works: This is a carrier vaccine, which uses a different approach than the mRNA vaccines to instruct human cells to make the SARS CoV-2 spike protein. Scientists engineer a harmless adenovirus (a common virus that, when not inactivated, can cause colds, bronchitis, and other illnesses) as a shell to carry genetic code on the spike proteins to the cells (similar to a Trojan Horse). The shell and the code can’t make you sick, but once the code is inside the cells, the cells produce a spike protein to train the body’s immune system, which creates antibodies and memory cells to protect against an actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. How well it works: The data J&J submitted to the FDA in early 2021 when it applied for authorization for its vaccine showed 67% efficacy in preventing moderate to severe/critical disease by 14 days after vaccination—and 66% effective 28 days after vaccination. How well it works against variants: At the end of 2021, J&J announced that preliminary study results from South Africa showed a J&J booster to be 85% effective against hospitalization at a time when Omicron was the dominant variant in that country. More data on the vaccine’s effectiveness against Omicron is forthcoming. An additional bivalent booster offers extra protection for those at high risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. The number of cases of COVID-19 may be dropping, but the disease is still a concern for those who are 65 and older (more than 53 million people in the United States) and those with weak immune systems (about 7 million people). Those two groups are more likely than others to get severely ill or die from COVID-19—that’s why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are offering a second bivalent booster shot. This booster is identical to the reformulated, or "bivalent," booster introduced in fall 2022 in that it targets two virus strains: Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5 and the original SARS-CoV-2 virus. The bivalent boosters are available from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. “I support the booster for those who are eligible and want to get it,” says Yale Medicine infectious diseases specialist Scott Roberts, MD. Studies have shown that COVID-19 vaccines can prevent COVID-related hospitalization and death. What’s more, the vast majority of the more than 1.1 million deaths from COVID-19 in the U.S. have been in people 50 and older, and the numbers increase with age, according to CDC data. Still, only 42.4% of people 65 and older—and 16.7% of all eligible people in the U.S.—have gotten the first bivalent shot, according to the CDC. “I consider that number to be quite poor,” Dr. Roberts says. As part of a bigger plan, the FDA also announced that the current bivalent mRNA vaccines will replace the original monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which target the original, or ancestral, SARS-CoV-2 virus strain; they are no longer authorized for use in the U.S. The agency is also planning to further simplify future COVID-19 vaccinations by offering a reformulated booster for a vastly expanded age group in the fall, around the same time as the flu shot becomes available. That booster will be based on recommendations about current circulating SARS-CoV-2 virus strains. Below, Dr. Roberts answered common questions about the FDA's decision to offer an additional COVID-19 booster to certain groups. 1. Should you get an additional COVID-19 booster? ­­­ It depends. The CDC recommends that everyone 6 years of age and older receive an updated (bivalent) mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of whether they previously completed their (monovalent) primary series. But if you’re age 6 and older and have already received an updated mRNA vaccine, you don’t need to take any action unless you are 65 and older or immunocompromised. If you are 65 and older, you are eligible for an additional bivalent booster if you had your primary COVID-19 vaccine and are at least four months out from a previous bivalent booster shot. You are also eligible for an additional booster two months out from your last shot if you are moderately or severely immunocompromised, meaning you’re an organ transplant recipient, you receive immunosuppressive medications or treatments (such as chemotherapy), you’re on certain medications that weaken your immune system over time (such as corticosteroids), or you have a weakened immune system due to a medical condition (such as cancer). You can self-attest to your immunocompromised status, which means you do not need documentation to get any COVID-19 vaccine doses you are eligible to receive, according to the CDC. The FDA also allows additional doses for immunocompromised people “at the discretion of, and at intervals determined by, their health care provider.” 2. Why is an additional dose of the bivalent vaccine allowed only for certain groups? Older or immunocompromised people are more vulnerable to severe disease, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19. That vulnerability is a growing concern as the bivalent boosters first offered last fall are already showing a decline in effectiveness. In April, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that the bivalent booster offered last fall provided added protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19, but it waned over time. It also showed older adults and those who are immunocompromised to be much more vulnerable to hospitalization and death from COVID-19 than young, healthy people. Another consideration is that older people’s bodies mount a less robust immune response to COVID-19, even if they are vaccinated. “This is true with many types of vaccines, and it's also true of viruses, such as respiratory syncytial virus infection [RSV] and influenza,” Dr. Roberts says. “It makes age one of the greatest risk factors for a negative outcome, in terms of infectious diseases, such as COVID.” 3. How do these changes to COVID vaccination affect children? Because the monovalent (original) mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the U.S., unvaccinated children 6 months through 4 years of age may receive a three-dose primary series of the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent vaccine. Those who are unvaccinated and 6 months through 5 years of age may get a two-dose primary series of the Moderna bivalent vaccine. Children in the above-mentioned age groups who have already received one, two, or three doses of a monovalent COVID-19 vaccine may get a bivalent shot, but the number of doses they receive will depend on the type of vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer) they’ve already received, their age, and vaccination history. 4. What if you’ve never been vaccinated against COVID-19? Most unvaccinated people are eligible for a single dose of a bivalent COVID vaccine, rather than multiple primary doses of the original monovalent mRNA vaccines. 5. What if you were vaccinated with the Novavax or Johnson & Johnson vaccine? For the majority of people, the CDC recommends the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Novavax boosters (and vaccines) over the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. This is because the Johnson & Johnson vaccine has been associated with a rare but serious blood clotting disorder. However, the Johnson & Johnson booster may be used in the following circumstances: For people 18 and over who had a severe reaction to a Pfizer or Moderna vaccine For those who would otherwise remain unvaccinated due to limited accessibility of Pfizer, Moderna, or Novavax boosters For those who prefer the Johnson & Johnson vaccine despite safety concerns. The Novavax vaccine is available in limited situations as a booster to people 18 and older. The CDC says people may get a Novavax booster if they cannot or do not want to receive a Pfizer or Moderna bivalent booster, they completed their primary vaccine series at least 6 months previously, and they have not received another booster dose. 6. How is this COVID booster different from the previous one? It’s not. These boosters are the same as the bivalent boosters first offered last fall. As with the previous boosters, these are mRNA vaccines, offered by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, that target two virus strains: the original SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5. 7. Will this shot protect against the current Omicron strain, XBB.1.5? Neither the 2022 bivalent booster nor this one is specifically formulated to protect against Omicron XBB.1.5, which in mid-April was the virus strain responsible for more than 88% of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. “However, that doesn’t mean this booster won’t protect against XBB.1.5 or other new Omicron variants that may arise,” Dr. Roberts says. XBB.1.5 is still an Omicron offshoot, and we know the bivalent booster has been effective against Omicron subvariants, Dr. Roberts explains. A CDC study in January assessed the bivalent vaccine introduced last fall for its effectiveness against Omicron subvariants XBB and XBB.1.5 in people who had previously received two to four monovalent vaccine doses. Scientists found that the updated booster’s real-world effectiveness against symptomatic infection for the first three months after vaccination for those strains was similar to what it was against BA.5. “If you have some immunity to a variant and are exposed to a new offshoot of it, you’ll have some protection,” Dr. Roberts says. 8. Why is the additional bivalent booster allowed but not ‘recommended’ for immunocompromised people or those 65 and older? “The CDC is giving people the option,” says Dr. Roberts. Although he is recommending the vaccine to eligible patients, some have given the authorization of a second bivalent booster mixed reviews. For example, some experts challenging the additional booster have brought up what’s called “immune imprinting,” a theory that says if you keep boosting against older COVID variants, you could be turning your immune response’s focus to the older variants no longer circulating. Then, future boosters that target newer variants may not generate as robust a response for you, Dr. Roberts explains. “However, that’s a hypothetical area of concern, and we haven't seen it play out yet in the data,” Dr. Roberts says. “Most data supports the boosters as being effective,” he says. “They do a good job of boosting the immune response against the current variants.” 9. Where can I get the COVID-19 bivalent booster? As with previous COVID-19 vaccines, this booster will be available at participating pharmacies and provider offices. To find a location near you that carries the vaccine and to schedule an appointment, go to Vaccines.gov. 6 myths about the COVID-19 vaccines — debunked or is it real debunked today. Wondering whether the vaccines are safe, whether they reduce transmission of the virus, or whether they protect against the new variants? Here's the evidence behind the vaccines' safety and efficacy. By March 1, approximately 50 million U.S. residents had received at least one dose of a coronavirus vaccine. With the pace of vaccinations likely to accelerate rapidly in the coming weeks — Pfizer and Moderna, the makers of the two currently approved mRNA vaccines, have each promised to deliver 100 million doses by the end of March, with Johnson & Johnson providing an additional 20 million — many more U.S. residents will suddenly have access to a vaccine. That’s good news, except for the fact that recent polls show a distressing number of people are still uncertain about whether they will get vaccinated when it’s their turn. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll in late February found that 44% of U.S. adults are still on the fence or unlikely to be vaccinated: 22% said they wanted to wait and see how the vaccines are working, 7% would get a vaccine only if it was required of them, and 15% said they definitely would not get vaccinated. That could translate into a protracted recovery for the country, as most experts estimate that 80% to 85% of the population needs to have some level of immunity for the pandemic to end. Vaccine hesitancy has many causes, not least among them distrust of the medical establishment — particularly among Black and Latinx communities — and concern about the rapid development of the vaccines. In recent weeks, though, mixed messaging about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines — whether they work, whether they protect against the new coronavirus variants, whether we can ever stop masking and social distancing — has many experts concerned that even more people will opt out. “I’m concerned that there are some broad statements about the vaccines that are informing the dialogue that aren’t true that are making people really worried,” says Monica Gandhi, MD, MPH, professor of medicine and associate division chief of the Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine at the University of California San Francisco at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center. We spoke with Gandhi and several other prominent academic experts about some common myths — and facts — about the vaccines. Myth #1: The vaccines are dangerous. During clinical trials, the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines were found to be exceedingly safe, with headache, fatigue, and arm pain reported as the most common side effects. “These vaccines do cause temporary side effects in a good proportion of people who get them. You’re going to feel a little achy, as if you’re fighting off a low-grade bug, especially after the second dose of the mRNA vaccine,” says Megan Ranney, MD, MPH, an emergency medicine physician and founding director of the Brown-Lifespan Center for Digital Health at Brown University. “These side effects show that your immune system is mounting a response, they are to be expected, and they are not dangerous.” As the vaccines have rolled out to a wider population, though, a few people have reported having an allergic reaction to the vaccine, including anaphylaxis — a severe, life-threatening reaction. A report published in JAMA Network on Feb. 12, 2021, of vaccinations between Dec. 14, 2020, through Jan. 18, 2021, found that a total of 66 people suffered anaphylaxis after vaccination during that time period — and that the rate was approximately 4.7 cases per million doses for the Pfizer vaccine and 2.5 cases per million doses for the Moderna vaccine. Most of those 66 people received epinephrine and/or steroid treatment, a few were hospitalized, and none died. “The post-trial monitoring has shown that the rate of anaphylaxis is really not much higher, if at all, than any other type of vaccine out there,” Ranney explains. “The data is super clear that the benefit of the vaccines … far outweighs this very small risk, which is in the order of three per million vaccines administered. And anaphylaxis is completely treatable.” Myth #2: The vaccines don’t really work that well — they don’t reduce virus transmission. Most experts have been urging people to continue following public health guidelines, including masking and social distancing, even after they’ve been fully vaccinated with two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine — and after enough time has passed for those vaccinations to have taken effect (generally two weeks). The reason for this recommendation is because while the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been shown to have 95% efficacy against illness (and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is 85% protective against severe disease), the clinical trials were not designed to test whether any of the trial participants contracted COVID-19 but showed no symptoms. “The experts are saying that the vaccines do not reduce transmission, but that is an inaccurate statement,” Gandhi says. “Vaccines have always decreased transmission. What they should be saying is that the clinical trials were not designed to test for asymptomatic infection, but there is every biological reason in the world to believe that they will reduce asymptomatic transmission.” There is already evidence to support this, she says. First, when the vaccines were studied in macaque monkeys (during preclinical testing), they did eliminate asymptomatic infection — researchers swabbed the vaccinated macaques’ noses and found little or no virus. Second, the types of antibodies that are stimulated by most systemic vaccines (IgG and IgA) do tend to block viral infection in the nose (and no viral load in the nose most likely translates to no transmission). Finally, when monoclonal antibodies are given to COVID-19 patients, those antibodies reduce the viral load throughout the respiratory tract, including the nose. The most convincing evidence, though, is just starting to emerge among real-world data. In Israel, where more than 90% of those age 60 and over have been vaccinated, “cases have plummeted in this population,” Gandhi notes. “Not just hospitalizations, which we expected, but cases [asymptomatic infection] as well.” Moreover, data from vaccinated health care workers recently published in the Lancet and preprint servers show reduced rates of asymptomatic infection and low viral loads in the nose when swabbing after vaccination. “I think that in a few months, we are going to be able to say with certainty that these vaccines not only protect you, they also protect those around you,” Ranney says. Myth #3: If you’ve already had COVID-19, you don’t need to get the vaccine. In early January, a group of scientists at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) in California published the results of a study examining the immune responses of 188 people who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. What they found was that 90% of study participants still had a robust immune response six to eight months after infection — and likely will continue to have immunity much longer, explains Alessandro Sette, PhD, an immunologist at the LJI whose lab has conducted extensive research into the immune response to SARS-CoV-2. That said, 10% of previously infected individuals did not show sufficient immune response — either in their production of protective antibodies, or memory B cells, or helper or killer T cells, all of which the study measured. “If someone has had COVID, I don’t think you can assume that they are protected,” Sette says. “It’s like saying, ‘Would you feel comfortable driving a car where there’s a 90% chance that the brakes work?’ Personally, I would take it into the shop.” There is some evidence, though, that for those who have had COVID-19, just one dose of the two-dose vaccination regimen by Pfizer or Moderna might provide sufficient protection. One study conducted by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York found that the level of antibodies produced after a single vaccine dose in those who had been previously infected was equal to or greater than that produced after two doses of vaccine in those who had never been infected. Similarly, a study at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) found that health care workers who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 had significantly higher antibody responses after one vaccine dose compared to those who had not previously been infected. “What we found was that for health care workers, if you have validated previous infection and antibodies, a single dose can be protective when you have limited doses available,” says Matthew Frieman, PhD, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at UMSOM and a co-author of the paper. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends that those who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 should be vaccinated with two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, though they should wait until they have recovered if they experienced symptoms. “Until we have more data, the safest way is to get two doses of the vaccine,” Frieman explains. Myth #4: The variants are going to get us anyway, vaccines or not. For the last few months, concern has been growing that a number of SARS-CoV-2 variants — mutated versions of the virus that seem to be contributing to greater numbers of hospitalizations and deaths in some parts of the world — could render the vaccines impotent. The important thing to remember is that not all variants are the same, says Frieman. Emerging data from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, as well as the vaccine candidates from Novavax and AstraZeneca that are not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration, suggest that all of these vaccines are highly protective against both the original virus and the so-called U.K. variant — also known as the B.1.1.7 variant — that is projected to become the dominant strain in the United States by the end of March. “The general consensus is that if you are vaccinated with any of the vaccines that we have now [including the vaccines from Novavax and AstraZeneca], you are protected against the 2020 strains and the U.K. variant,” Frieman notes. The so-called South African variant, technically known as B.1.351, and the Brazilian variant, known as P.1, are similar and do not seem to be as easily neutralized by the vaccines, Sette says. But that doesn’t mean the vaccines are completely useless. “We have been doing some calculations and it seems that most of the pieces that the T cells recognize are not changed in the variants,” he says. “What that means is that the T cell response [induced by the vaccine] may not prevent infection, but it can impact disease severity.” Gandhi agrees. “We are talking about the variants as if our T cell responses stimulated by the vaccine are not important. But they’re very important in preventing severe disease. And that matters because we never would have been in this mess with SARS-CoV-2 if it didn’t cause severe disease.” Myth #5: We’re never going to go back to normal, so why get vaccinated? In fact, the Biden administration announced in mid-February that it had purchased 600 million doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, to be delivered by the end of July. Coupled with Johnson & Johnson’s pledge to deliver an additional 100 million doses by the end of June, that would be more than enough to vaccinate every U.S. resident. In the meantime, vaccination will allow you and your vaccinated pals to return to some semblance of normality even sooner. What might that look like? Can two people who are fully vaccinated be with each other without masking? “The answer is a firm and definitive yes,” Gandhi says. “If you are around other people who have been vaccinated, you can take that mask off and enjoy being with them,” Ranney adds. Can a vaccinated person be around an unvaccinated person without masking? No. “While I’m almost positive that vaccination is going to take away transmission, if you had a little viral RNA in your nose, we would never want a vaccinated person to pass that on to an unvaccinated person,” Gandhi says. “So, mask around the unvaccinated until they are vaccinated too.” Can two vaccinated people enjoy dinner in an indoor restaurant? Maybe. “Because these are such powerful vaccines, you should be able to go out to eat, especially right now, when most of the restaurants have extra ventilation and spacing and the waiters are all wearing masks,” Gandhi says. Ranney is a bit more cautious. “A couple of months from now, when most of us are vaccinated, going back to restaurants is going to be very safe,” she says. “But right now, given the high rates of COVID in the community and the fact that the vaccines are not 100% effective, that would not be my first choice.” Instead, she would recommend having your vaccinated friends over for dinner in your home. Can you hug your grandkids? While the vaccines aren’t likely to be available to children until later in 2021, Ranney plans to reunite her parents and children as soon as her parents are fully vaccinated. “The risk to them of getting really sick from COVID is quite low. But the risk to them emotionally from continuing to be separated from my kids is higher. It’s a risk-benefit equation. We’re not going to completely eliminate COVID from the world, so two weeks after my parents get their second dose, we’re going to get together.” Can you fly or go to the gym? “If vaccinated, you can go to an indoor gym, fly (maintaining your masking for others), and start opening up your life,” Gandhi says. Myth #6: As-yet-unidentified variants are going to get us eventually. While scientists are monitoring several new variants across the globe, there is some concern that SARS-CoV-2 may mutate into a highly transmissible, highly deadly virus that even our powerful vaccines cannot combat. But while that’s always a possibility, immunologists are generally convinced that humans have the upper hand. For one, surveillance has increased across the globe, and scientists are on the lookout for any new variants that might crop up in ways that they might not have been during earlier surges, when health care systems were overwhelmed. Second, if new variants do emerge, vaccine companies are prepared to quickly alter the vaccines. And altering the existing vaccines will not require large-scale clinical trials, since any alterations are unlikely to affect the underlying safety of the vaccines. “Essentially, you are just changing a few amino acids,” Sette says. Third, as transmission rates go down (as they have in Israel), that will also control the variants. “If you don’t control the number of infections, you have millions of people who are walking incubators, where the virus continues to replicate and more mutations and more variants can occur,” Sette says. “Whatever can be done to stop the spread at the same time that more people are vaccinated is a major variable.” More important, though, is that there is increasing evidence that the virus only has so many tricks up its sleeve, Sette says. He points to the fact that a similar mutation originated in both South Africa and Brazil as evidence that the ways in which this virus can mutate may be finite. “It’s not that each variant comes up with a completely new set of mutations,” he says. “The fact that the same set of mutations has been used by two different variants on two different continents is strong genetic evidence that the virus is mutating itself into a corner.” And then, SARS-CoV-2 may wind up as nothing more than the fifth cause of the common cold — behind the four other coronaviruses that currently make us miserable (but don’t usually kill us) the rest of the year. It doesn’t require much in the way of a leap of the imagination to anticipate that the same murderous regime that has brought us forced abortion and sterilization, forced organ harvesting, and genocide in real time would also be developing deadly bioweapons to release upon the world. This is probably the key to everything. For the Vaxxed, for the Unvaxxed. Here is an explanation of the natural and synthetic parasites we are facing, and a guide to the three things you need to do to protect yourself and your family. I do not believe the vaccine is an irreversible step. NOTES: mRNA is too expensive to make. In 2018 a mRNA treatment cost $1 million and now only 2-3 years later they have it for billions of people for only $30 per dose? She says it doesn't make sense. She shows a short German video about Cancer as a parasitical infection. Questions Dr Lee Merritt asked herself: Why are cancers bursting out after the vax? Why does autoimmune disease respond to anti parasitical? Why do THEY (Fauci & others) hate antiparasiticals? Why can't we find mRNA's in these vaxxines? 18 labs around the country can NOT find mRNA's inside the vaxxines. Parasites & cancer under the microscope look identical. Shows Karen Kingstons work where they couldn't make a biological bioweapon work so used a synthetic nanoparticle smart hydrogel which IS the real spike protein. With this stuff in the body and 5G turned on it binds with the ACE-2 pathway and people get sick. Dose the population & control disease outbreak with external wavelength (5G). The best thing we can do right now is take the antiparasiticals. Mother parasite laying eggs. She gives off a hormone that keep the eggs unhatched but if she dies the eggs hatch. Specific time cycles to do the 3 day cycles. (28 minute mark) Start with a SHORT CYCLE of 3 days on & 5 days off. Gradually lengthen your cycle (Watch for a reaction). 2 months minimum. Once you can get to 3 days on & one month off you are on MAINTENANCE. In summary, parasites are at the heart of this. She like Chlorine Dioxide but if you tell anyone to take it you could go to jail. Check out her site THE MEDICAL REBEL as she has a simple guide on Chlorine Dioxide. https://drleemerritt.com/ Use at least 2 drugs for the cycles. Dr Lee Merritt uses NITAZOXANIDE & FENBENDAZOLE. NITAZOXANIDE (Alinia) 500mg twice daily for 3 days. Gut parasites (It takes out hydra (A fresh water parasite). Super duper stuff that gets rid of 85% tape worms in 3 days. FENBENDAZOLE (Panacur C) cycle- Gets into the brain & cysts)- 750mg daily for 3 days. CHLOROQUINE HYDROXYCLORIQUINE IVERMECTIN CHLORINE DIOXIDE. Source: The Medical Rebel rumble channel