Jordan Peterson's Conservative Manifesto

The source for my insistence that there is a problem with individual sovereignty

Wherein I take issue with his unqualified defense of individual sovereignty. It's bollocks, us the Brits might put it.

I am beginning a multi-part response to Jordan Peterson's statement of political doctrine. He calls it "conservative". But, really, it's just Lockean Liberalism.

Wherein I complain that Peterson doesn't go far enough.

The core of the problem is how these two principles are conceptualized, and set against concepts like community, responsibility, and tradition.

The one question Peterson really struggles with

The third leg of the liberty-autonomy-agency stool

The Sovereign Individual becomes the Sovereign Citizen

An argument from consequence, in defense of Merit.

Sure, responsibility is great. But what does Jordan mean?