🇨🇦 Canadian Citizens Journal

When accountability weakens, the effects don’t stay inside Parliament. In Part 4, we focus on what structural power shifts mean for citizens and taxpayers — including faster decision-making, less explanation, large spending commitments, and reduced public consent. Democracy doesn’t vanish in moments like this. It becomes distant. And distance is where frustration grows. #CivicExplainer #CanadianPolitics #Democracy #Accountability #PublicInterest #CCJ #CitizenJournalism #Parliament

When people hear the word “silencing,” they often imagine bans or arrests. In democratic systems, whistleblowers are more often silenced politically — through credibility attacks, procedural barriers, lack of protection, and narrative control. In Part 3, we explain how this happens without censorship, and why the cost of speaking up often discourages future disclosures. The issue isn’t whether truth exists — it’s whether it’s allowed to reach the public record. #CivicExplainer #CanadianPolitics #Democracy #Accountability #PublicInterest #CCJ #CitizenJournalism #Parliament

Most people think accountability disappears all at once. In reality, it weakens quietly — through process, control of committees, and limits on scrutiny. In Part 2 of this CCJ Civic Explainer series, we look at how accountability mechanisms function inside Parliament, and how those mechanisms change when one party controls the system meant to oversee itself. This is not about intent. It’s about structure — and why structure matters. #CivicExplainer #CanadianPolitics #Democracy #Accountability #PublicInterest #CCJ #CitizenJournalism #Parliament

A lot of Canadians are feeling uneasy — not because of one policy or one headline, but because decision-making is starting to feel more distant and harder to question. This civic explainer is not about accusations or party politics. It’s about understanding how power works inside Parliament — and why people are right to pay attention when that power shifts. In Part 1, we explain the structural difference between minority and majority governments, and why the removal of parliamentary friction matters when trust is already low. Democracy doesn’t disappear overnight. It changes through process — and understanding that process is essential for informed citizens. #CivicExplainer #CanadianPolitics #Democracy #Accountability #PublicInterest #CCJ #CitizenJournalism #Parliament

🇨🇦📢 CCJ Daily News Brief — December 16, 2025 This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. Unfiltered Canadian truth. ⸻ I want to talk about something Mario4theNorth recently brought to light — and why it matters to how Canadians are being informed. A number of people tried sharing Mario’s video and were stopped by a so-called “fact check,” claiming the clip was missing context. Let’s be honest. That’s how video clips work. A clip is an excerpt — not the full hearing, not the full testimony, not the entire video. No reasonable person believes a short clip is the whole event. If people want the full context, they’re capable of searching for it — and they do. Labeling a factual clip as “misleading” simply because it’s a clip isn’t transparency. It’s misdirection. In this case, Mario shared actual parliamentary testimony, quoting a government official’s own words about digital processing related to refugee entry. He didn’t invent anything. He didn’t change the wording. He repeated what was said. Instead of addressing the testimony itself, the so-called fact check reframed the issue — narrowing definitions, changing the focus, and then debunking a claim that was never made. That’s not fact-checking. That’s twisting context to imply dishonesty. What makes it worse is the pattern. Unrelated topics — wildfires, voting procedures, refugee processing, gold reserves — are grouped together to create the appearance of “misinformation,” even when each claim stands on its own. That practice is misleading. Bundling separate issues to discredit a person is no different than lying by implication. When organizations do this without transparency, without clear methodology, and without honestly addressing what was actually said, they lose credibility. At that point, calling them “fact checkers” becomes laughable. Facts don’t need spin. They don’t need gatekeepers. They need honesty. This is why I rely on primary sources. I read parliamentary transcripts. I watch full hearings. I look at original documents. I decide for myself. When fact-checking organizations are not transparent and mislead the public through framing and implication, they are not a trustworthy source of information — and I don’t acknowledge them. That’s not ignorance. That’s discernment. I mean… someone’s got to fact-check the fact-checkers. Canadians deserve clarity, not labels. Truth, not narrative enforcement. Transparency, not manipulation. This is why I don’t watch the news. This is the Canadian Citizens Journal.

🇨🇦 Canada’s Debt: What You’re Told vs What the Numbers Actually Say Canadians are often told that Canada has the lowest debt in the G7. That claim relies on net debt, which subtracts assets — including CPP and QPP pension funds — from government debt. The problem? Pension funds are future obligations owed to Canadians, not free government money. When debt is measured honestly using gross debt, without subtracting pension obligations, Canada’s ranking drops sharply — placing us near the bottom of advanced economies. Same data. Different framing. One version reassures. The other informs. Credit to Mario4theNorth for bringing this issue to light. Transparency matters. This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. #CanadianDebt #FollowTheMoney #BudgetTruth #Mario4theNorth #CCJNews #FiscalTransparency #GrossDebtVsNetDebt #CanadaPolitics

🇨🇦📢 CCJ Daily News Brief — December 16, 2025 This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. Unfiltered Canadian truth. What the Government Isn’t Telling You About Canada’s Debt I want to give credit to Mario4theNorth, who recently brought attention to a major issue with how the federal government presents Canada’s debt. Canadians are constantly told that Canada has the lowest debt in the G7. What politicians usually mean is lowest net debt — and that word net is doing a lot of work. Net debt is calculated by taking government debt and subtracting assets. One of the largest “assets” Ottawa subtracts is Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan funds, totaling close to $800 billion. But here’s the problem. Those pension funds are not free government money. They are future obligations owed to Canadians — pensions people paid into and expect to receive. In plain language, that’s a liability, not a spendable asset. When pension obligations are subtracted, Canada’s debt suddenly looks much smaller — allowing politicians to claim we’re fiscally strong. But when economists and international institutions look at gross debt, which does not subtract pension obligations, Canada’s position changes dramatically. Measured honestly, Canada drops from near the top of the G7 to near the bottom, ranking among the more highly indebted advanced economies. This isn’t speculation. OECD and IMF-style analyses have repeatedly warned that net debt figures can be misleading when pension obligations are treated as assets. This doesn’t mean pensions are gone. It means Canadians are being shown a selective version of the financial picture. So when you hear claims that Canada’s finances are strong, ask one simple question: Strong by which measure — and what was excluded? Credit to Mario4theNorth for bringing this issue into public view. Canadians deserve transparency — not accounting optics. This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. #CanadianDebt #FollowTheMoney #BudgetTruth #Mario4theNorth #CCJNews #FiscalTransparency #GrossDebtVsNetDebt #CanadaPolitics CanadianDebt, FollowTheMoney, BudgetTruth, Mario4theNorth, CCJNews, FiscalTransparency, GrossDebtVsNetDebt, CanadaPolitics

🇨🇦📢 CCJ Daily News Brief — December 16, 2025 This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. Unfiltered Canadian truth. ⸻ What the Canadian Taxpayers Federation Is Pointing Out (And What I Do Instead) ⸻ I want to share something the Canadian Taxpayers Federation has been pointing out — and why many Canadians, including myself, no longer rely on legacy news to understand what’s really happening in this country. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation recently appeared before committee to raise serious concerns about the CBC — concerns rooted in documents, financial disclosures, and the CBC’s own reporting. According to the CTF, the CBC is receiving $1.4 billion a year in taxpayer funding. They point out that this same money could instead fund thousands of paramedics and police officers, or help tens of thousands of Canadian families afford groceries — at a time when Canadians are struggling. The CTF also highlighted executive compensation. Documents they obtained show CBC President and CEO Catherine Tait earns between $460,000 and $551,000 annually, with bonuses of up to 28%, while layoffs were announced in CBC newsrooms. At the same time, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation points to the CBC’s own audience data, showing that over 98% of Canadians are not watching CBC News. In Toronto, CBC’s 6 p.m. news reaches less than 1% of the population. But the most serious issue the CTF raises isn’t just cost or ratings. It’s independence. They argue that a journalist who is paid by the government cannot fully hold the government to account — because government funding creates a built-in conflict of interest. And this is where I want to speak personally. I don’t watch legacy news. Not because I don’t care — but because I don’t want information filtered, softened, or framed for me before I ever see it. Instead, I go where the Canadian Taxpayers Federation went — to the source documents. I read Parliamentary committee transcripts. I review government budgets and public accounts. I listen to unedited hearings, not just selected clips. I follow independent journalists and citizen researchers who publish documents and evidence, not narratives. I compare sources. I pay attention to what’s missing. Because Canadians deserve information that is not candy-coated, not twisted, and not shaped to protect institutions instead of the public. You don’t have to stop watching the news — but it should never be your only source of information. Read the documents. Follow the money. Think for yourself. This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. 🇨🇦📺 CCJ News Brief — Why Defunding the CBC Is Back on the Table https://rumble.com/v733j0m--ccj-news-brief-why-defunding-the-cbc-is-back-on-the-table.html #DefundCBC #CanadaPoli #TaxpayerAccountability #MediaIndependence #CanadianCitizensJournal #FreePress #FollowTheMoney #PublicFunds #CCJ

CCJ News Brief — Parliamentary adjournment in effect from December 12, 2025, to January 26, 2026. #CanadianPolitics #Parliament #Accountability #Transparency #CostOfLiving #PublicInterest #CitizenJournalism #CanadaNews #GovernmentOversight #CCJ

CCJ Daily News Brief — When Politics Destroy Lives - The Helen Grus Case CCJ Daily News Brief December 16, 2025 This is the Canadian Citizens Journal. Unfiltered Canadian truth. In Canada, a police detective was punished — not for wrongdoing — but for asking the wrong questions. Detective Helen Grus worked in Ottawa’s Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Unit. Her job included investigating unexplained infant deaths. In late 2021, she noticed something alarming: Sudden infant death cases had tripled. She did what police are trained to do. She reviewed files. She raised concerns internally. She briefed senior command. She did not accuse. She did not reach conclusions. She asked for monitoring and proper investigation. Two weeks later, she was suspended. Not for falsifying evidence. Not for leaking information. Not for misconduct toward the public. But because her questions had “political ramifications.” In 2025, an internal tribunal ruled that police must seek permission before investigating issues involving public officials. That ruling means this: The government may not be investigated — without government approval. This is not accountability. This is not justice. This is not independent policing. When politics override investigation, truth is buried — and lives are left without answers. This is the Helen Grus case. And it should concern every Canadian. “This is the Canadian Citizens Journal.”