Deep State

OG vid https://www.bitchute.com/video/bIxc0xG4L94

RFK Jr on the Shawn Ryan Show. "Conspiracy theorist" was a move they used to limit MARK LANE's influence after he won the lawsuit for Liberty Lobby against E. Howard Hunt by destroying Hunt's alibi. https://rumble.com/v6ix6ad-e.howard-hunt-v-mark-lane-trial-that-proved-cia-complicity-mx-city-theachil.html

Full show: https://odysee.com/@Weezy:a/jfkoperationmockingbird:f

AI short film from Deep Dive America YT, Music "Dark Times" by Kevin MacLeod Probably just review for most people here but you can share with your family if they dont know, pretty clear explanation.

Patel Patriot & Burning Bright on Devolution Power Hour #378 this week. Full Show: https://rumble.com/v6x8l46-devolution-power-hour-ep.-378.html Timestamps are from the radio program without the intro: add 6:10 IIRC to transcript to find them talking about it "Devolution Power Hour Ep. 378: Election Setups, Cybersecurity Theater, and the Narrative Wars -Jon Herold and Burning Bright return for Episode 378 of Devolution Power Hour to unpack the latest narrative shifts and psyops as we barrel toward the 2024 election. The duo digs into Rasmussen’s explosive poll showing 60% of voters suspect the CIA played a role in the assassination of JFK [didnt get to this, or any of the other description, I understood this was the episode plan before they were alerted to Sperry's posts, so maybe next ep], then tie that distrust into the broader awakening of the American public. They explore the strange coincidences surrounding Meta’s recent outage, hinting at predictive programming and election interference pretexts. Discussion also includes the DOJ’s indictment of two Iranians over election-related cyberattacks, which Jon and BB argue is a carefully timed narrative weapon. -With sharp analysis, they trace the evolution of “RussiaGate” through to “IranGate,” spotlighting the weaponization of intelligence and media in managing the political battlefield. From Jon’s Substack dive into a DOD contractor’s links to election software, to the ongoing shift from COVID to climate as the next control vector, this episode connects the dots on the elite’s toolkit of chaos. All wrapped in the show’s signature balance of wit, receipts, and hard-hitting analysis. TRANSCRIPT 🔗 00:09 The Badlands. Running the Badlands. Explain those Badlands. That's a hell of a name. We are right about the fraud. Joe Biden can't be president. Congress. 00:25 The chair declares the joint recession resolved. 00:32 Foreign. Good evening, everybody, and welcome to the Wednesday edition of the Devolution Power Hour. Hope everybody's having a great week so far. Bernie Bright, how are you doing? 00:47 Pretty good. I always. I was having some. Was my audio working? 00:53 I don't even sound as gay as usual, so. Oh, yeah, appears to be just fine. 00:57 Today was one of those weird days where I was like, I feel like we're not gonna have anything to talk about. And then of course, did like 40 minutes of perusing. Now we'll have too much as usual, I'm sure. 01:09 Yeah, sorry. If you get the right background in here. One second. It was, it was a good day. Like, I. There's a ton of stuff to talk about, but then at the end of the day, I have my kids, were playing around, I got them a trampoline, put that together, and then I cut my son's hair. And all of a sudden I was like, oh, my Gosh, it's like 8:30. They haven't gotten other baths done or anything. And I just got here like five minutes before the show and we didn't talk anything about what we're going to talk about, so we're going to wing it. 01:32 I think trampoline is going to kill your grass, man. 01:35 Well, move it around a little bit. 01:38 You got some nice grass. I. I have to say, we've had like a drought in my area and I do not have irrigation. 01:45 Oh, no. 01:45 And every day I just kind of sadly walk along the dried husk of what was a beautiful lawn and hang my head in shame. 01:57 Yeah, you should be ashamed if you have a bad lawn. I got lucky. When I moved in here, there was sprinklers and I like to use them in the summer. And especially because the neighbors one side of my house, they're very, like, very wealthy and they have like a huge, like awesome backyard with a pool and a slide and. And it just. I'm very jealous of the backyard. But the one thing I can do is, like, I'm going to make my yard look greener. At least one of a pool, but it'll be greener, right? So I take pride in that. 02:29 Well, I'm upset about mine. So anyway, it's put me in a sour mood, but I'll get out of it. 02:35 Yeah, like you're in a sour mood right now. From here? 02:38 Yeah, because of my lawn. 02:39 Oh, it's that bad, huh? Maybe we should change. 02:43 It's usually pretty great. It's like. It's like the best thing about my house, and it's become the worst this year. 02:49 You have a big backyard. How come you don't? How can you. Sprinklers. 02:53 They were just never installed, and I assume it would be very expensive to install them. 02:59 You probably do that yourself, though. I did that at my old house. Just dig a little trench and. I mean, there is some stuff I had. I did call a plumber and just said, anyway, this has nothing to do with devolution or just do irrigation info. War talk. 03:14 Irrigation. Anybody have any irrigation advice in the chat? 03:19 By the way, I do have a question. We're debating doing a fantasy football league for the Badlands hosts, and I'm wondering if people would be interested in, like, watching us do a draft or something. I think that'd be fun. 03:33 Yeah. 03:33 And. 03:34 And as G said in the chat, sats. I think he's on to something. I would recommend that any Badlander who does decide to join, if we do a SATS league, you best have some SATs, because you don't want to commit to SATs. A SATs price without any. 03:51 Well, depending if we get enough just for Badlands hosts, like, if we open up to everybody. We can't have a. Like, you only have so many people in the league now. How are we gonna choose? We can't play favorites. 04:01 I just meant I would hope every Badlands host has sets. 04:05 Yeah, we know the NFL is faking gay. It's still be fun to do, like, that show, I think, and. And do a little league and talk crap to each other. But anyway, I do want to. I want to talk at least a little bit about some of the stuff I covered on my show today, namely the Rico Grande situation, because there's some, I think, new developments and then beyond that, I don't. Whatever you want to talk about, man. 04:30 Was Mrs. Bright telling everybody my wood is unchopped in the driveway. I've been. I'm gonna chop it. 04:37 You have unchopped wood in your driveway? 04:39 Yeah, I've been meaning to chop it. Just hadn't got around to it. I had a non functioning shoulder for quite a while. It's good to go though chopping. 04:47 I think you had surgery on that shoulder like a year ago. How long has that wood been in the driveway unchopped? 04:53 Probably about a year. 04:54 Oh, wow. 04:56 Yeah. 04:56 So you ordered wood knowing you couldn't drop it? 05:00 No, My dad cut a tree down, and I need to chop it. Chop the rest of it. 05:06 He cut the tree down in your yard? 05:09 I was at a gart. I was at a gart, and I came home, and my dad was like, I didn't like that apple tree that was in your next. Your driveway because it was, like, dying. So he cut it down, and I was happy about it. But I did tell him, like, dad, you can't just do that. Can't just cut another man's tree down without talking about it first. 05:29 Yeah, but. 05:30 Yeah, but we will talk about actual stuff, too, besides just that. 05:34 Maybe. We'll see. We'll see. Maybe we should just talk lawn care the rest of the show and, like, landscaping and shrubbery. 05:44 And all of those subjects. 05:46 So anyway, let's. Let's get a quick word from our sponsors, and then, yeah, we'll get into the Rico grande stuff and whatever else comes up. We might need your help tonight, Chad, with any topics that you want us to go over. The first up, I'll probably get rid of that. First up, we got a little chef iq. This thing is Chef iq. Hadn't heard of them before until I got the little meat thermometer, which calling the meat thermometer is. I don't know. You can't even call it that. It's so much better than that. It's awesome. We've been using it all the time now. I still got to take my video, but whatever. It's amazing. And then I got the ice thing, the ice machine, which revolutionized ice for me. I. I cannot drink any ice. I even have it right now. I got the. 06:28 The ice from the ice machine and then the slushy machine, and now the mini oven. They're doing a flash sale right now. And you gotta check out the smart convection oven that sits beautifully on your countertop. Replaces that old air fryer that doesn't do anything very well. And listen to all the things that the mini IQ Oven can do. It fries chicken that tastes like takeout, except it's healthier. Bakes pizza like a pizza oven. It grills steaks, hamburgers, chicken, and fish like your outdoor grill. It bakes bread like a bread maker. It cooks bacon to your liking until spread to perfection. It even comes with an egg tray that makes whipping up delicious eggs a breeze. And bakes cakes and muffins so moisture, you'll think they come from a bakery. Best of all, your IQ mini oven connects to your smartphone app. 07:14 So whatever you're cooking, just like with your little Meat thermometer. And you can use those in conjunction with each other. That's what I've been doing. It tells you when it's all done. Perfection. It's amazing. So check it out, Chef IQ.com use promo code DPH. They are revolutionizing the kitchen game. It's awesome. 07:34 Awesome stuff. I love the. 07:36 The. 07:36 Maybe we should call them like skewer. Skewer monitors or something. Monitors. Because you're right. Thermometers. Meat thermometers. Isn't. Isn't quite enough. 07:46 It's really not. 07:48 But it's good stuff, as you guys have seen with my amazing video. 07:52 Yeah. What is. What is it? The neuralink. Right? That's what Elon's using. It's like that. 07:56 That's what we need for grilling. I see where you're going with this. We should be able to mentally regulate. Yeah, exactly. Speak. I want. I want my grill to read my thoughts. Exactly what I'm thinking about how I want everything done. 08:13 We joke about this, but someday that'll probably be the case. 08:16 Yeah, right. 08:17 It will be reality. We also got a little CB Distillery. Good friends over at Seab Distillery. Seabeed Distilleries. VIP sale is on for a few days only. You can save up to 50% on everything with Code Rumble. They only do this sale a couple times a year, so I highly encourage you to take advantage if better sleep, less stress and pain relief after exercise. Sound good to you? You need to hear about CBD from CB Distillery. They have plant based solutions for just about everything. Sleep, stress, mood and focus, even pain after exercise. All made with high quality clean ingredients. They even have CBD for your pets. Many of you already are feeling the difference, especially with their sleep products. That's my personal favorite. So if you're still tossing and turning at night or struggling with any other health concern, ditch the tylenols. 09:04 Ditch the cabinet medicine. But by the way, this is not like healthcare advice. Get advice from your healthcare provider, but ditch those things and try cbd. CBD from CB Distillery. You can say big promo Code Rumble. R U M B L e. Up to 50% off. CBDistillery.com promo code RUMBLE. Not available in Idaho, Iowa and South Dakota. I think when we're down there for guard, we need to have a word with South Dakota about why they don't allow cbd. I just don't understand. I'll never understand. 09:29 Funny. These state by state, like the. The very peculiar specific restrictions on things. 09:35 That is weird. We already got a new member, new YouTube member. Kathy LaBelle, thank you for that. Try to keep an eye on those tonight. Ash wants to know if your dad is George Washington because of the apple tree. 09:47 He is not dissimilar George Washington. I always talk about my dad, that it's a bit of a paradox where he's like a huge Revolutionary War enthusiast, but being born and raised in the northeast and being in the trades and the unions, he was a JFK Democrat, so he remains vote blue no matter who. Even though I'm like, dad, all these guys you read about all the time are super based and you're just not. 10:15 That's rude. 10:16 Well, I mean he is, he just doesn't know he is. That's the thing. Oh, can't be chopping down trees and then voting for Joe Biden. 10:24 I think that's probably the best part of like, that's the best kind of base is the people who are super based and don't even realize it and aren't even like trying to be based. 10:31 Right. 10:32 The best kind of base I wish. 10:33 You would have, I don't know, Ben Shapiro is the best kind of base to me. Just kind of that sneering, snickering, like smarmy college groomer style based Judaism. That's what we need. 10:46 Waiting for you to throw the Jewish thing out there. 10:48 I wasn't gonna, I wasn't going to do it, man. But it was implied. 10:52 Implied. All right, let's. I got a couple of videos to show you guys. So again, if you watched my show today, which I know all 12,000 of you tuning in right now probably digs, why wouldn't you? You probably saw some of this. But now you're going to get to see it again and you'll get a lot of words from Burning Bright in response. So it will be different. It will be different. Let's start with this video from Devin Nunez. He did an interview with John Solomon, which I think that's notable in and of itself. John Solomon, his role in this whole thing, being like the leading reporter on all of it. It's, it's very important. We've talked about this before. He was the guy at the very end. And plus, isn't he like in the Q drops? 11:35 I know people talk about that a lot. 11:36 As far as off the top of my head, it was John Solomon and Sarah Carter were specifically talked about in the drops. There could have been others, but Solomon certainly was believed by many who followed the drops to have some sort of protection and Been in being handed stuff like second or third hand. 11:56 Yeah. So that's interesting. Plus, at the very end of Trump's term, it was Trump's chief of staff. Why can't I think of it now? What the heck? Who's the chief of staff again? At the very end, Mark Meadows. He delivered the Russiagate binder to John Solomon and John Sullivan was going to make copies because Trump had declassified everything. And then the next morning the Secret Service came and picked it up because they wanted to make further redactions. And at that point it all disappeared in the thin air. Nobody knew where it went. All seems a little fishy, right? But Devin Nunez, also key player in this. This is what he had to say on a show. And pay attention to what he says here at the beginning, talking about what happened because of the intelligence community shenanigans. 12:38 What these guys are doing is like the Charles Manson of politics and manipulation of intelligence and conspiracy. People have died, people have been. People have lost their livelihoods, people have lost their careers. People have not been promoted. Families have been destroyed. Finances have been wiped out. Millions of Americans were kicked off of social media. News networks like Will America's Voice were not allowed onto the legacy media platforms. This damage is far and wide. Biden has been ongoing for a long time, so Nixon is not even a drop in the bucket to what this kind of two or three dozen criminals in and around the Clinton operation, the DNC and Obama's operation and Biden's operation for that matter, have been doing now for over a decade. 13:32 So again, right at the beginning, talks about all the things that have happened and he says people have died. Just kind of funny. He compares them to the Charles Manson like. 13:41 Yeah, I mean, like psychopath. Yeah, like notorious. The person you think of when it comes to. Not just psychopath, actually, but I'm willing to accept that as a calm, satanic, ritualistic psychopath. 13:56 So it is. Isn't he the guy too, who, like, he was the ringleader and he got a lot of like the underlings to carry out all these murders for him. 14:04 Exactly. 14:04 Very similar to like an Obama who being the ringleader, got all the intelligence community to carry out the dirty work for him. 14:11 Right. 14:12 Maybe that's, maybe that's where he's going with that. But okay, so then that was, I think two days ago, and then this was either this morning or last night, I'm not sure. But John Solomon went on with Liz Wheeler and he described, I mean, a lot of different things, but the Big stuff here is a little bit towards the middle end when he gets into what the actual charges that they're going to be going after these people for. And we've been kind of waiting to figure out, like, what are they going to use to charge these people with this grand conspiracy? Because there has to be like some sort of large, you know, superseding crime and then there's going to be other crimes that led to furthering the overall overarching crowd. I don't even know what, how to describe it. 14:50 Overarching maybe, but we've been curious what that's going to be. And he finally kind of disclosed it and yeah, it's pretty juicy. So take a listen. And I do know the audio on this is a little on the low side. It's not my video and I don't control your volume button. So if it's too soft, just. 15:09 Turn up a little bit to make it easy to gather evidence. I think three places to look are New York and Washington, just for assisting grand juries, but not for bringing indictments as common that prosecutors use multiple grand juries because of where people live, save the travel costs. I think the big banana grand jury, the one that will decide on indictments, will probably be put in Fort Pierce, Florida, which is the same area where President Trump's Mar A Lago classified documents case was brought and ultimately dismissed. The reason for that is that's where the most recent acts of an ongoing conspiracy may have been committed, which is. That's where the raid on Mar A Lago was authorized from, where Jack Smith did his work. 15:49 So remember, he's getting inside info from. I don't know if it's Cash Patel or who Dan Bongino, maybe it's Pambanti. He's the leading edge. And so when he's saying this stuff, he kind of makes it sound like he's speculating, but he's really, it doesn't. He's not speculating every time. So far he's been pretty much right about what's. How this is going to play out. And so he knows that the most recent thing they're going after is the Mar A Lago raid and the Jack Smith stuff, which is why they can down in Florida. That is interesting and important. 16:21 Yeah, yeah, he's pretty much been like the teaser trailers of this stuff and he started it off, what, two weeks ago by saying, you know, in the wake of the Epstein files a month ago, that. Yeah, right, the MAGA base, you know, should in so many words should rest assured that the disclosures that they're looking for are coming. 16:40 Which, by the way, I do have a new Epstein clip that I'm sure the audience is going to love. 16:48 Trump. 16:48 We'll get to that later, though. Yeah. 16:51 Where it was determined that Jack Smith wasn't lawfully empaneled as a special prosecutor. That's an important act. And where there are now concerns, according to the Office of Special Counsel, the whistleblower office, that Jack Smith may have engaged in election politics while operating as a prosecutor. So the reason that's important is if you do the most current events and you impanel the grand jury in Florida for charging purposes, all the things that can go all the way back to 2016 can flow through that one grand jury as the charging instrument. And the way we're going to see this evolve is that we've already had grand juries, right? We had John Durham do grand juries. He brought indictments. People got acquitted. They're not looking at this as Mickey Mouse little cases. They're not looking at, this guy lied, this guy filed a false report. 17:35 They're looking at what started with Hillary Clinton's clearing on the email case and the starting of Russia collusion through Ukraine impeachment, where they hide Hunter Biden's problems, but try to pretend Donald Trump has a Ukraine problem all the way through. Jack Smith is one ongoing criminal conspiracy. And in that, the charge, the overriding charge of the conspiracy will be deprivation of civil liberties under color of government authority, meaning the United States government used its powers in the intelligence community and the FBI and the Justice Department to meddle in elections. And by doing so, they deprived people like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos and President Trump and Mike Flynn of their civil liberties. They may have deprived all Americans of their civil rights to a fair and free election. And as a result, that is the overarching charge of the conspiracy. 18:25 Then there are many overt acts and sub crimes that could be charged against that, false statements. But when you take it in that context. 18:32 So I think this is huge because he kind of lays it all out and then when you couple it with what Devin Nunez said about the people have died, that's what I think is so interesting. This is the actual crime here, the deprivation of rights under color of Law, Section 242of Title 18. And if you go down here to the bottom, whoever, under any color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom, willfully subjects any person in any state, territory, commonwealth, possession or district to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the constitutional laws of the United States in the very end shall be finer this title or imprisoned not more than 10 year. I just want to get to the very end of this. Oh, if death results from the act. Sorry, last thing. 19:18 If death results from the acts committed in violation of the section, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or both, or maybe sentenced to death. So I don't know. He said that on John Solomon's show, by the way, that people have died. And then John Solomon later is like, yeah, this is where they're going to. And now we have a potential avenue for what I know a lot of people want to see. I, I don't think we'll actually get there. But it's notable. Just saying it's notable. 19:48 Well, yeah, one of the. I mean, if we go to the end point there, none of us knows how this is all going to play out, but certainly this is the most. Sure. Anybody's been, you know, following this stuff for years, whether you've been following it for a few years or all the way back to the drops, et cetera, or just back to when Trump was publicly accusing Hillary Clinton of being a treasonous witch, essentially, and the absolutely infamous, maybe the first truly memetic deployment of Donald Trump, you'd be in jail. I mean, that one shattered the American political paradigm. And, you know, that was the declaration of war, I think, for many at the time, but for many in hindsight, certainly with all this stuff, if you go to the end point, many people want to see traitors get hanged. 20:37 They want to see justice in an extremely public way. I'm certainly sympathetic to that. I can make a very strong argument that seeing a very public accounting of justice is something that is needed as a paradigm shift for the nation. And, and by that I mean essentially a generational paradigm shift, because that's the type of thing that carrying out of justice, especially if it's against whether it's the big, big names that we've been talking about that I just mentioned, or even heads of intel agencies, etc. Whoever the traitors are, as it's determined, even people that have not followed a lot of this stuff, which is most people, by that I mean in depth, most Americans are tangentially aware of this narrative, but they will. It forces engagement with the narrative, any carrying out of justice to that degree. 21:35 But if I want to say, you know, to your point, when you're like, I don't necessarily think we're going to see that. I don't see that as a negative take. I don't see that as, you know, some people will say that's dooming. We need justice. Like, we're not going to prevail without justice. And if I want to go in that direction and say, we're not going to see executions, we're not going to see that kind of biblical justice rendered upon these kinds of names. I don't think it's this pussification, pacification type thing of we don't want to hurt people's feelings. I actually could see this as a weapon, a unifying weapon of Donald Trump. And I think he really has given many hints over the years that he sees the value, the mass psychological value in being seen as merciful. 22:23 And he's hinted at this for a long time, specifically with regards to Hillary Clinton, like, oh, I didn't arrest her at that time because of national unity. I think we're going to see justice. But when it comes to what you just read there and the end points of what we could do, I think Trump probably sees the value in not doing those things, even though he could do things. And I think that's like the ultimate full story arc of Trump, the inversion in terms of how the other side of the country sees him in. If he's the one who comes in and is like, I know what we should do, but we're not going to. But now we're all going to go forward together. There's going to be justice, I think, but just maybe not what some people want. 23:10 Yeah, no, I, I totally agree. There's going to be justice. I'm not trying to, like, doom about that. I'm, I've been all in. I've been like, rereading everything. My mind map is going insane right now. I'm having a lot of fun, like, digging through all this stuff. I do think you can prove a whole host of different crimes and, like, just based on publicly available information, you can make a lot of inferences as well. You would need the sauce to back up some of those other bigger crimes and some of the bigger names where. I don't think, when I said I don't think they'll do it or get there, it just specifically refers to the death aspect because. 23:41 Yeah, me too. 23:42 Even. Even though I think it's interesting that Devin Nunez said, you know, people have died because of this, like in the court of law to get to that end state of that rule or that, you know, whatever section Title the law is for them to be able to even use the death penalty, you have to prove that these people's actions directly cause the death to happen. And I, I think they're going to have a hard time doing that. 24:07 I like everything you said there about Trump, you know, maybe not even being willing to do that if it got to that point, which I think that's an interesting discussion to have too, but I don't even think it's going to get to the point where he's going to need to make a decision on it, because as far as what we know now and what we've seen now, I don't think there's enough of a. There, there to make that leap in a court of law. You know what I mean? Like, can you prove that people wouldn't have died or would. Yeah, maybe. Let's just use J6 as an example. Would nobody have died on J6 if they didn't do the intelligence community shenanigans in 2016? I mean, probably. But can you prove that? 24:47 I don't think you're gonna be able to make those type of connections, and that's why I think it's not, I don't think it's gonna get there. But I do think the way they're doing this with the overarching, like, all these things, like, they're gonna be able to pursue a lot more people a lot broader. They're gonna have a lot broader of a brush than what we saw with, like, Durham and some of these other investigations. I mean, Durham was the only one that actually tried to bring forth indictments, and it was basically a nothing burger, and they didn't even let him use half the evidence in some of this stuff. 25:12 Right. 25:13 If they can pierce some of this attorney client privilege and some of the privilege, executive privilege that Obama and some of these people were invoking along the way. I think they're going to be able to go a long ways and rope in a ton of people from the Obama administration, the Biden administration, and it's going to be huge. I just don't think we're going to see these life in prison sentences. But I'm getting ahead of myself even talking about that, you know. 25:39 Yeah, I think, maybe, I think some of the hints that Solomon's dropping there as well, some of the overall language I like that he's using is the start. He's saying, like, this is the start. And I don't think just he's talking about the justice phase. But he's talking about what we've been talking about for a while, that this collusion, speaking of collusion between Obama and Clinton, the Obama presidency and the Clinton campaign is the kickoff of the whole grand conspiracy, the overarching conspiracy that continued on straight through the first Trump term, straight through Obama, I mean, Biden, and then straight into the steal of 2020. He's. I think that, I do think the word treason is notable that Trump always brings into these discussions in terms of. Because that's kind of. That. That cut through of. Maybe you can't. 26:37 If you did want to get these kind of people for high crimes, then maybe to your point, you can't necessarily nail them on this specific kind of causal relationship of your actions caused this to happen. But with treason, you don't have to do that. Like, with treason, you don't need to say your treasonous acts caused this. The act of treason itself, the act of betraying your country. If you're in a position where you can be hit with that, it renders everything else moot. So I do think there's a reason Trump has been dropping treason comms forever. I don't think he's just been doing that as sort of a narrative booster. And I think we could see this whole legal campaign grand conspiracy run and then it could escalate to that level separately. 27:31 I would love to see it happen. You know, I'm just also trying, like, while I'm on the rug and I'm very excited, I'm also trying to, like, set realistic expectations and temper my own expectations just so I'm not, like, disappointed in the end result. I, I don't know if there's enough outside of our bubble. We're in a bubble on in our community and even on Twitter and on the social medias. I would say, by and large, the general public thinking of my friend group that I text with, they never send me anything having to do with any of the Russiagate stuff ever. Yeah, they'll send me Epstein stuff. Epstein questions. I just got a question the other day. Do you think we're actually going to see the Epstein files? 28:13 They haven't sent me a single question that I can remember since I even started this. The devolution stuff about the Russiagate stuff or Spygate stuff or justice or any of that stuff. I don't know if a majority of the people want the justice like we do. If they got it. If they saw, like, oh, Hillary's going to prison, that's great. She's the worst. I don't think they're going to be, oh, she's only getting five years and 10 years in prison. She's not being hanged for treason. What the heck? I don't think we're going to get that kind of demand outside of our community. Do you understand what I'm saying with that? 28:44 Yeah, I do. And that's why I don't know if I had said this last week. But I think this is going to be a little counterintuitive the way this all rolls out. I think it's going to be a little counterintuitive for a lot of infowar people, meaning that we know what the conspiracy is, we know what the crimes are. To your point, even people who are MAGA people are like, they really don't understand. They just know that Trump called these people liars, etc. I think this is going to happen in a bit of an inverted pattern. So by that, I mean it's not going to be like the narrative seeding phase and the germination phase that's been the last decade. And to your point there, it has saturated and reached who it's going to reach. 29:30 The people who could be convinced about these traitors, etc. By the story alone have been convinced or not, or they have completely defected from the entire conversation. They think it's too toxic. It's he said, she said. And I'm saying those normies, they even apply that he said, she said at this point to administrations, Liberal and Republican DOJs. I mean, look at the whole lawfare campaign they carried out against Trump. A lot of them will just say, well, this is just the Trump administration doing the same thing. Which is why I think that an actual arrest, an indictment of a major, major figure, that is going to be the thing that prompts the active engagement with the story. 30:20 So it's not going to be that they're going to win this argument and get the public mandate for justice and then the arrests are going to happen, which I think is how a lot of used to think of this. I think the arrest is going to happen and then everybody is going to be glued to the argument. And I do think, you know, maybe not everybody, but if you get, you know, major figures, I mean, look at how mimetic Donald Trump getting indicted was nationwide. And now if you have that, but it's Hillary Clinton, for example, and then you've got all this actual information coming out that's not just like tax receipts and hearsay and nothing burgers in the Trump trial. 31:03 I think essentially that was setting the template of we're going to get a rerun of this with the other players, but with all actual crimes. So it's not going to ever hit anybody, everybody. But I think that's how you actually prompt the engagement. You get people actively paying attention to it, including lefties, because it's going to be so dramatic. And then, you know, you just let the facts tell the story. 31:29 I mean, everything you said, I agree with it. You know, if a shocking like Hillary Clinton charged with treason like that would kind of force people to pay attention and then maybe start understanding, like, what's going on. I'm a little distracted because people in the chat are saying, like, Angie K just posted. John, check what I just tagged you. And BBN new D class just dropped by Paul Sperry. Paul Sperry doesn't have any authority to D class stuff. So I'm curious, I'm trying to find, like, what you're referring to here. Can you just like, post on. Post the link to whatever you're talking about? Because that would be helpful because I'm not seeing anything online. 32:13 And if we do get the new D class stuff to drop right now, that will totally hijack the rest of the show and that's all we're going to be doing. 32:20 Live digging. 32:22 Yeah, but I don't see anything. I feel like that would be. Oh, wait, no, this can't be. 32:34 Clinton plan 2.0 transcripts. The Clinton plan never ended. Continued after the election as Clinton campaign officials secretly met with Fusion GPS to refinance and repush the anti Trump dossier. 32:48 But that's not like the actual documents, is it? 32:50 Right. Well, it says transcripts. 32:55 Paul Sperry is sometimes good, but also Paul Sperry is sometimes just regurgitate stuff that's already been out. 33:02 Right. This, he's, this has the early feel of that. I've got the. 33:06 He's reporting for a second. Yeah, pull it up. 33:10 So the lead just says top officials within the Hillary Clinton campaign re engaged with opposition research. 33:16 Go back to the top. Go back to the top. This is a 2020 article. 33:22 Oh, man. So he's just, he's taking a victory lap is what it seems like he's saying. Told y'. 33:31 All. And people in the chat are saying he's reporting a D class. Like, yeah, we know. More D classes coming. I think they must be talking about this one here. Hold on. 33:39 Okay. 33:39 Pull you off developing Sources tell me ODNI and CIA are preparing affidavits for more than a dozen additional whistleblowers who will attest to intelligence abusing Trump, which could be presented as evidence to a grant federal grand jury. Once Bondi selects distract or district to your case. Yeah, I'm not seeing anything new. 34:00 I think that's interesting though, even. I mean, obviously it's interesting on its face. The grand jury thing that's obviously been in the news all day. But you know, how, what's a grand jury all about? It's literally about storytelling. It's, it's not, you know, they're not bringing, they're not bringing a conviction or, you know, deciding a case, but it's all about is the case going to be brought and it's going to be interesting. We're not going to be in that room. But based on the reporting, it's interesting to consider how are they going to lay out this story to the segment we just did. Right. 34:39 Like, if you're trying to get people, ostensibly a random assortment of American citizens of any political persuasion, if you're trying to get them to bring charges against very notable figures in a very partisan environment, what's the story that they bring forth to do that? What order do they do it in that. That, you know, we might get hints based on what saw how Solomon is laying his case out. 35:09 Yeah, it's. The thing about it right now is it's still super convoluted. Like you're gonna need to be able to tell this story in such a easily digestible way. Yeah, that isn't convoluted. I mean, I can even just. Let me show you my mind map real quick. Like it's shit all over the place. It's not even like that much, but all these linked other things and you know, like there's a ton of stuff on here. It doesn't look like much, but even this is like confusing trying to map out the story. Right. 35:39 Yeah. 35:39 How are you going to be able to digest this for like you need a five minute little video that proves it so that 0the normies are like, oh, that is bad. Yeah, that is bad. 35:51 I think, I think the way in is relatively simple. And then when you peel back the layers, it gets incredibly complex. Right. The mechanisms of how these crimes were committed are complex. And then as Solomon has been saying for a month, etc, it goes forward on the timeline into all these different crimes. Right. But if we're Just thinking, grand jury, what's. How does he word it there? Intelligence abuses against Trump. Right. That's essentially what they're saying this is being impaneled for. I think the lead in is fairly simple. It's. You have everyone knows about the Russiagate conspiracy, right. No matter what your normie friends, my normie friends think about it or care about it, everyone knows about it. It's just a ubiquitous thing. 36:48 So, okay, grand jury, you know the Russiagate thing, that giant narrative that demonized Donald Trump for his entire first term and dogged him, that story was made up in collusion between the sitting outgoing Obama administration and the incoming Hillary Clinton campaign. I think that even to a bipartisan audience, whether they agree with it or not is a pretty simple sell. All the details of how that was done get very complicated, but you're basically just saying, you know, the most famous thing ever discussed about Donald Trump, it's a lie. And we are here to prove to you that the sitting president and the person, he wanted to win the election. And that's all public. Right. A lot of, A lot of the heavy lifting for a grand jury has been done by these public figures. Donald Trump amplified the Russiagate narrative. 37:47 All of them amplified the narrative. And nobody, Democrat or Republican, would have any qualms about accepting the premise that Barack Obama wanted Hillary Clinton to be the next president. Right. And might have been willing to do something to make that happen. So I think that's. And I even love that Solomon and others are using that word collusion. It's per. It's a perfect inversion, right? How do you invert the Russia collusion narrative? Collusion between Obama and Clinton, then? I really think we're at the beginning of years of not a trial, but trials of, well, then it led to this, and then it led to the election, and then it led to this. But for this grand jury, you know, I know Solomon, I might be wrong here. 38:33 I know Solomon's talking about a grand conspiracy, but you can have a grand conspiracy that is just about Russiagate and then you can bring other charges about everything that then led out from that. 38:46 No, that's wrong because you have to. In order to have the. The statute limitations, you have to do the most recent stuff, otherwise the Russiagate stuff doesn't fit in. So it has to include it all. 38:56 What I'm a starting point anyway. 38:58 Oh, yeah, he said it there. And it's what we've been saying. It starts with the mid year exam and how they handled that and then switched over to the Russiagate stuff, like the two different handlings, which I think once, and I think I've said this before too, once they get through whatever this phase is that they get through, maybe we don't get the justice that we want and demand from just this grand RICO case, but what if we go back and reopen the mid year exam and Hillary Clinton's emails that was never properly investigated because of what they were doing with this grand RICO case. And what if we go back to the Benghazi thing and what if we go back to like the gun smuggling stuff because of how they handled. 39:39 If you can prove that the intelligence community did not properly handle intelligence or weaponized the government in the opposite direction by not actually doing what they're supposed to do, how many crimes were committed that they didn't, they just let slip through the cracks. Like those things can then probably be reopened and re examined regardless of the statute of limitations because of the conspiracy aspect of this whole thing coming up to like this most recent date. 40:05 Yeah, man. And, yeah. And a few weeks ago, I think when this was kind of first re. Breaking in the info war, a lot of our conversation was about how this starting point, this narrative starting point goes forward in time, which is usually what we talk about. But to your point there it goes backward. And you know the key question that would come out of a trial like this and a case like this becomes why? And I think by that I mean if it is sufficiently proven and argued that Obama and Clinton colluded in this way to stop the Trump administration from gaining power, the question becomes why? And I don't think the answer is going to be left at well, he was a political opponent, really a sitting president. 40:51 If this goes the way we think it could go, a sitting president committed felonies and treason and a former Secretary of state did the same thing for a political reason. Or to your point, was it to. Was the collusion itself to cover up all of the crime, the lifetime of administrative administration crime they committed at the highest levels of government. So that might maybe to reframe the years will not be this narrative we're looking at, but all the other stuff that certainly could be going on for a long period of time. 41:32 Yeah, I'm hoping with the strike force being assembled it won't take too long. But speaking of collusion stuff, one of the more fun things that I've been doing lately is trying to, trying to show that Obama was much more connected to this than people are trying to let on. Like Everybody always says, like, Obama was at the center of this whole thing. And we basically know that to be true. We believe it to be true, but can we actually prove it to be true? I don't necessarily know. We can make that case yet. And maybe we'll get some sort of confession to come out of a Brennan or somebody. Somebody's going to roll and say that. Yeah, I was directed from him. And we have a couple subtle pieces that are like, yeah, this is coming from the White House. Come from the top. 42:11 There's a discussion going around about him having immunity. We've talked about that a lot on this show. 42:17 Trump is amplifying that. 42:19 Yeah, Trump is amplifying that. But so one of the more fun things I've been doing is trying to, like, piece him in and find the piece of the puzzle that connects him to Hillary. And that's what I've been doing on my mind map. And so there's a lot of talk about. Did you watch that clip, by the way? 42:35 I watched a couple earlier today. 42:37 Okay. Yeah. So you'll have seen this, too. I talked about this in my show, but there's a lot of talk the last couple days about Martha's Vineyard because what's his name, Les Wexner? Is. Is he bought it or bought the former house that Obama used to rent? He used to rent it. Obama didn't own it. So it wasn't a payoff to Obama. It was probably was some form of money laundering. But Obama wasn't the beneficiary of it because he wasn't the owner of the house. But I went back and looked at all the times that Obama was there and I was thinking like, okay, he was there. He wasn't really doing anything. And I found this article of Obama attending all these, like, dinners and different things. 43:11 And it's like, I wonder if Hillary at any point was in the same place at the same time, because I don't think Obama is dumb and I don't think he was going to, you know, send a text message or an email or a strongly worded letter or anything implicating himself in green lighting. This entire thing he would be doing, you know, okay, they happen to be in the same place at the same time. I showed back on a recent show that back in July, Obama was on a plane with Hillary Clinton going to a campaign stop July 5, right here. The president, Secretary Clinton were on a plane for an hour and five minutes by themselves. And the very next day, I mean, it's the same day that Steel Provided his first reports same day that Comey dropped the charges on Clinton. 44:01 Didn't bring charges, whatever. It's a lot of stuff started kicking off. So every time these two meet, things kind of start to spark up. Back In August of 2016, Obama was in at Martha's Vineyard. He went to Valerie Jarrett's house to watch fireworks. Well, Hillary Clinton was in Martha's Vineyard that same time frame, 19th, 20th. And then the very next day is when Rodney Joffe started his work, emailed his team, they start digging on stuff, looking for a connection. The Alpha bank hoax, a connection via the Internet IP addresses between Trump and Russia. 44:41 And why I think that's notable is I found this one quote which I didn't find before, and this is something we talked about before, but I just think it makes the point hit home that much harder, is on August 22, three days after Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were both just happened to be in Martha's Vineyard at the same time. And then two days after Joffe starts off the whole thing, one of his researchers responded to an email of his and said, like, hey, bro, how do we, like, tell people that this isn't spoofed UDP traffic, which. Which is basically fabrication of IP traffic. He's like asking like, we can do this, but how are we going to be able to defend ourselves from the criticism that we didn't fabricate this whole thing? That's essentially what this email is saying. 45:23 And why that's so interesting is going back to that whistleblower that we got recently, where he's basically saying, yeah, I was looking into these email addresses to find a connection to Russia. I was questioning these specific connections and I was told to shut it down. And then I later thought that some of this DNS service might, you know, be other third parties, not Russia, possibly somebody related to the Durham investigation. And there's this little enclosure three that we don't have yet. And so the whole thing, it just, it sparked from this Obama meeting. Yeah, hypothetical. Maybe they didn't. I can't prove they met, but it is sure weird that they were both in the same place, the same time, same date, and all the stuff that sparked afterwards. So I thought it was interesting enough to show. 46:04 Yeah. And, you know, if we're speculating on the sort of, the rollout, how does this start rolling out narratively? Obviously we're seeing how it's rolling out. It's. It's clearly rolling out in order, starting with Russia. Russia gate. You know, this community wasn't built just On Russiagate, the truth community, that was the beginning, and so it's obviously starting there. I think that's very encouraging. What I'm really interested in is who are going to be those first figures who are indicted, questioned publicly, etc. And I think that a lot of what you're laying out there, both with, both from the white hat perspective and the black hat perspective, is it's going to be intel. I think. 46:50 I don't know this for sure, but kind of going back to what we've talked about at the beginning of the show here, when you're looking at those big names, the original characters in the infowar, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, those are the big juicy names. Those are the prime characters. I don't think that's where it's going to start. The. The people who have been paying attention to how the sausage is made, like in this community, they're going to understand that it involves those figures. Everyone's going to understand it involves Donald Trump in terms of being the target of this operation. But it makes sense that when we first started hearing about this resurfacing a month ago, it was all about, you know, Clapper, Brennan, Comey. 47:32 And I think not only from a legal perspective is that a great place to start, but from a narrative perspective and a public awareness perspective in terms of this, the unraveling of a scandal. I think it's also a great place to start because with your mind map that you're going over here, a lot of the quotes that you've got there, it's like you've got intel talking about how they were told not to look into this. You've got this spy versus spy crap going on. So what's, what would be great is if you've got Comey, you've got Brennan, you've got these guys, you know, cracking under the pressure. And again, the magical word. Why? The question why. Why did you. What did you do? That story is going to be told very publicly. Why did you do it? 48:16 And that why allows them to organically bring in the bigger names. I think it's a better way to start. And I think patriots know that, again, they could go after. I'm sure that they could go after whoever. They have proof of crimes. The stupidest, easiest thing to say, right? But I don't think they're going to start with the biggest names. I think they're gonna start with the hatchet men, the ones who did the acts. And then that allows them to tell the story. It allows those Men to be forced to tell the story about why they did those acts. James Comey did not act of his own accord, nor did John Brennan. And on and on down the line. 48:58 So, you know, and what's going to be great, even in terms of some of the documents that you've been, you know, highlighting in recent weeks, it's probably going to be a lot of other intel assets that are going to be doing the tell alls in these trials about their former bosses, which is going to be great to not just have it in documents. 49:19 Yeah. The best part too is if, you know, we talked about this last week, I think, and John Solomon had a clip where he's like, well, if Barack Obama has immunity, then he can't plead the fifth Amendment because otherwise he would be lying. You know, he'll have to tell the truth. Totally. If he doesn't, he'll be lying to Congress and then he can be charged for that. Well, if that's true, he's gonna have to tell the truth about this whole thing. And Obama's gonna have to be the one that's like, yeah, I know Brennan has been denying all these things, but he actually is guilty of everything. He did do all that. Yep, he did do all that. And that would just be really interesting to see, I think. 49:52 Yeah. And then you're gonna get the, you know, the, the war dogs turning on their masters and saying, I only did this because my commander in chief instructed me to do this. And that's going to get into some interesting and squirrely territory. I don't think it's going to protect them, but from a public, you know, like, it's hard for us to imagine a lot of normies giving a shit about this. So we open the show that way. For years we've talked about this, but these are juicy kind of things. Even for just Normieville to have former heads of the FBI out there, you know, as their ship is sinking in public because there's no way for them to escape accountability or the fact finding mission that's going to show. This is what the record shows. 50:36 Their only way out is to say I did it. And this is why. This is, this is for whom I did it. 50:43 Yep. And so I hope we get to that point. I hope there's enough evidence that comes out. And the best part about this, at least in my opinion, I don't think we've seen the most damning stuff yet. Like it's gradually it's like a crescendo. There's a lot, there's a huge base of information that we've had for a long time to like build this picture that we know what happened here and we're just getting those little pieces to fit in the middle. And I don't think we've gotten the most damning stuff yet. We've gotten a lot of stuff that has reinforced what we've already known. But the best evidence they're going to save. They're not going to. You never give publicly the stuff you have until you're ready to like full bore go against everything. 51:21 You know, like that's how you engage not just on the legal side, but in the infowars side. You let these people come out there and deny and say all this stuff and make up all this bullshit. That's fine. When you're ready and can prove your case and handle some of the stuff that you need to on the legal side and not compromise the legal side. That's when you show the bombs, right? That's when you drop those bombs. 51:41 Yeah. 51:41 And that's still coming. 51:43 Yeah. It's like jeopardy, Double jeopardy, all that kind of stuff. It's like you let them play the string out. And I like that you draw a distinction there. You know, I think there's a distinction between the legality, the legal framework of how all this is going to unfold and the story of how it's all going to unfold. I said this on a show, you know, maybe a year ago or something like that, but I know it sounds simple, but I, I do think people get so in the weeds of the legality that they do kind of forget that very literally most aspects of our legal system, for good reason, they're storytelling. What is a claim in court is. It is a story that you are bringing into court asserting something. What are you doing before a grand jury? Jury. 52:25 You are literally telling them stories. And the, and the burden of proof, I've been on a grand jury. It's, it's very, it's fairly low. Rather, you know, you're not convicting people. So the narrative inroads, the narrative threshold rather is lower for a grand jury than obviously it's going to be in some kind of trial. But even still, the narrative framework, it should start with the hatchet men. It should start with the easiest to explain crimes and the easiest to prove crimes. And then you get into motive and you get into who and you get into why. And that, like the smallest trials of a murder or something, I mean, you know, micro trial like that and the highest trial of grand conspiracy and treason. They should follow that framework. There's a reason they do. 53:17 You know, you open with your theory of the case, which I think in this one is probably going to be the Barack Obama administration colluded with the incoming Clinton administration to frame Donald Trump as a Russian asset. It's actually simple. I think we all overcomplicate it because we can't help but think of the dominoes that deployment set off for the next decade. 53:41 Yeah, I mean, that's obviously the big, a big part of this, but the part that I'm most excited about, we have the biggest base of information about the Russiagate stuff. In order for them to actually go after this crime, they have to still be able to get the conspiracy at a much more recent date. And we don't have any actual like, you know, behind the scenes discussions or interviews or dates or anything having to do with anything really that happened since Trump left office. We have the Mueller or, sorry, the Durham report and the Mueller probe and all these IG investigations and those pretty much ended 2019. We've had some, or, sorry, 2023, we've had a few other things, but we don't have any of the behind the scenes stuff for the Jack Smith or the impeachment hoax or any of those things. 54:24 And that's the stuff that's gonna be really fun to tie it all together. 54:26 Because they're all hitting the news in different ways at the same time. 54:29 Of course we're basing our judgment on this is like treason and these people effed up based on just the Russia collusion hoax. When they're telling us that, yeah, that's just the start. There's a 10 year window here and we're going to tie it all together. That's the exciting stuff for me is we don't know what that is. And if it's as damning as the Durham stuff is, I mean, it's going to be a no brainer if they can do this properly. That's, that's what's exciting. And what you said there too, about the, what'd you say, the grand jury thing, there is a lower threshold that you need to actually get an indictment out of that and there's no defense, like the defense doesn't come in and offer the defense for any of that stuff. 55:10 So I see no issue with them, especially in Florida, getting grand jury diamonds. 55:15 It's very active. It's. It's a very. It's a. It's a very proactive phase of the legal process where it's. The accuser comes in. Yeah. And tells the story. It's like, is this story it. The way I almost think of it is it's not. Is this story compelling enough or do you believe it could be true enough to convict somebody and send them to prison forever or charge them with treason? It's basically, is this story compelling enough to hear more about it in a more formal setting and to hear from the other side? Would you like to hear from the other side? If you would, then you still should vote to bring this to trial. And that's kind of. It's kind of an interesting aspect of the grand juries that you're in a strange way by. 55:56 It absolves a lot of grand juries of any kind of feeling of guilt because they don't. They don't have to think that they're passing judgment. They're saying, well, actually, I want to hear from the accused. And the only way to do that is to go to trial. 56:10 Yep. Which. This will get there. I'm almost positive for sure. I'm curious to see who. The prosecutor. Yeah. Oh, I already said, like, that rug. It's a rug we've been on before. It's formed to us. Like, we left an imprint, so it's very easy to climb back on. It'll probably be more difficult to. To have it pulled out from under us. What is the kid moving around? 56:34 I just. He's, like, laying face down. So I'm doing a breathing check, but he's fine. 56:40 Is he laying face down, like, right next to you or. 56:43 No. On a monitor. On my monitor. 56:44 How can you check for breathing on the monitor? 56:47 I could see him. It's a pretty legit monitor. It's like a trail cam. 56:53 To check breathing and everything. 56:56 Well, I can just see him. I can see his. His. His back going up and down. 57:00 Oh, gotcha. Awesome. Well, while you're doing that, let's do a quick promo for Gart, then we'll get into the. What? I don't even know what we're going to talk about next. Maybe the Epstein stuff, and then we'll see what else we got for you guys. One second. 57:19 I'm in South Dakota. Trouble ain't hard to find. 57:32 Can't make it to Deadwood. 57:34 No problem. 57:35 Join us virtually for the ninth stop on the Badlands Great American Restoration Tour, streaming live August 15th through 17th from legendary Deadwood, South Dakota. Experience GART from anywhere with our exclusive virtual livestream ticket. Your pass unlocks front row access to lively discussions and the premiere of Codex 9 11, all from the comfort of your own home. Make new friends and have your questions answered live from the group chat. Grab a ticket to join us in Deadwood. Visit bank Badlands Media TV Deadwood, and get your pass today. 58:29 It's exciting stuff. I can't believe I'm gonna be there next week. Next week this time, actually. 58:35 Absolute madness. 58:36 Less than a week. It's crazy. 58:38 There is a. There is another live stream tomorrow afternoon, 2pm, exclusive live stream for anybody who is a ticket holder in person or virtual. So if you get that, you'll get an email probably around noon Eastern with the link to the live stream. Replays are available too, if you're, you know, busy during the day. But those are just kind of smaller, more intimate with a few of the hosts. We'll jump on and probably argue with Ash about something. 59:06 Mostly arguing. Man, I tried so hard to avoid an Ash and G Money panel, and it happened again. 59:14 Which one is it? 59:16 Future of Representation. 59:18 Oh, my God. 59:19 But Ash. Ash assured me she will not participate in G Money shenanigans, and I'm gonna have G. Money do the same thing. But I do have, like. I can show you guys a little bit of our panel schedule, give you an idea what we're going to be doing. Hold for processing here. How do I share that window? There we go. 59:45 You know, I do love how I. I always suspect that there are sock accounts in the tr. In the chat. 59:51 Oh, it's super obvious right now. 59:53 And then somebody comes in and says Trump is a kid and Ash is a Jew. So, you know, this is just. 01:00:01 Oh, there's some other ones that are, like, pretty. 01:00:05 Yeah, yeah, that one's not sneaky. But there's. There's. There's plenty of. We know what you guys are doing, and it's the same old shit. 01:00:16 Yeah. So none of this. None of this is final, but this is a, likely saying. I don't even know if I'm allowed to do this. I don't know if Mrs. Bright's gonna get, you know, real upset about me showing this ahead of schedule, but just to give you guys some teasers, these are the panels. Future Manifest Destiny. Future of Entertainment. Future of Health. Future of Work. Little Q and A. Future of the Intelligence Community. Future of Info Warring. Future of Representation. Future of Past. We'll put out some more info on what those are. But these panels are great because we get some more mix and mashups of hosts that typically don't do shows together and keeping themed make for a really entertaining and educational experience for everybody. 01:01:01 And plus, obviously with the involvement from those in the telegram

Mike Benz

I don't believe any of this ever happened, but let me clarify: someone did put on a mask, ring a doorbell etc (who is not fat enough to be the guy they tell us did it) and they acted out their script for whatever reason, but they did shoot any lawmakers. The DS has a long history of faking these shootings and this was probably a PR stunt for Kobluchar and launching point for new anti-4A laws. But now the guy's saying Walz made him do it 🤣🤣🤣🤣 It wasn't suppposed to go this way!

Just a ridiculous story. https://www.dailywire.com/news/minnesota-state-senator-wife-say-they-were-shot-a-combined-17-times-by-masked-assassin https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/06/20/now-we-know-why-the-minnesota-assassin-story-disappeared-overnight-n4941019