Show: Expert Witness with Doug Minor and Steven Palmieri

In "Expert Witness" Ep 20, Doug Minor, a seasoned credit repair expert turned witness, discusses how the credit industry handles disputes of inaccurate data. If unresolved, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors, with Minor’s damage assessments strengthening cases. He suggests credit repair organizations (CROs) add expert witness services for extra income and credibility, bridging the gap to litigation. Minor evaluates cases for potential lawsuits, aiding CROs in connecting clients with attorneys. His expertise enhances odds against bureaus, especially in unique scenarios like address disputes for vulnerable consumers.

In "Expert Witness" Ep 19, Doug Minor, a former credit repair expert turned witness, explains how the credit industry allows disputes of inaccurate data. If uncorrected, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors, with Minor’s expertise bolstering their cases. He highlights how becoming an expert witness enhances credibility for credit repair organizations, increasing success odds against bureaus. Minor discusses finding a niche, leveraging experience, and the courtroom process, noting thousands of annual cases need experts. His role exemplifies how professional testimony strengthens consumer lawsuits.

In "Expert Witness" Ep 18, Steven Palmieri and Doug Minor, a credit damages expert, explain how the credit reporting industry allows disputes of inaccurate data. If unresolved, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors, with Minor’s expert testimony strengthening their case. He discusses courtroom unpredictability, emphasizing preparation and likability as key to influencing outcomes. Minor’s role enhances leverage against bureaus, though significant policy shifts typically need major judgments or regulation. The episode ties pre-litigation strategies to litigation success, highlighting how expert support boosts odds against credit entities.

In this episode of "Expert Witness," Doug Minor, a credit reporting damages expert, discusses his role in helping consumers dispute inaccurate credit information. He explains how expert witnesses provide critical opinions that strengthen legal cases against credit bureaus and creditors when inaccurate data isn't corrected. Minor highlights the process of writing expert reports and rebuttals, emphasizing their importance in court. With his extensive experience, he calculates damages from credit inaccuracies, enhancing a consumer's chances of winning lawsuits. The discussion underscores how expert testimony can be pivotal in holding credit bureaus accountable.

In Episode 16 of "Expert Witness," Doug Miner and Steven Palmieri discuss leveraging factual disputes in credit repair, mirroring Doug’s expert witness approach. Doug, a credit damages expert, highlights how the industry disputes inaccuracies via Metro 2 standards. If unresolved, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors. Doug assesses damages—like wrongful foreclosures impacting credit lines—enhancing case strength and win odds. He urges CROs to align disputes with clients’ goals, using factual data to boost outcomes or attorney referrals. Contact: doug@dougminer.com.

In Episode 15 of "Expert Witness," hosts Doug Miner and Steven Palmieri explore how the credit reporting industry disputes inaccurate data using the Metro 2 standard. Doug, a seasoned expert witness, explains that if errors aren’t fixed, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors. He uses Metro 2 to assess inaccuracies, like wrongful foreclosures, that trigger damaging credit line cuts. As an expert, Doug bolsters cases by quantifying damages, enhancing win odds against bureaus and creditors. He urges CROs to stay current and build fact-based disputes for better outcomes or attorney referrals.

In Episode 14 of "Expert Witness," hosts Doug Miner and Steven Palmieri discuss how the credit reporting industry disputes inaccurate data. Doug, a former credit repair expert turned witness, explains that if errors persist, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors. He emphasizes knowing opposing experts’ tactics, enhancing case strategy. As an expert, Doug strengthens consumer cases by assessing damages, increasing win odds against bureaus and creditors. He advises CROs to build solid fact-based disputes, improving deletion rates or attorney handoffs for litigation.

In Episode 13 of "Expert Witness," hosts Doug Miner and Steven Palmieri, joined by Matt Listro, explore how the credit reporting industry disputes inaccurate data, particularly in mortgage forbearance and foreclosure cases. Doug, a full-time expert witness, notes that if errors aren’t corrected, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors. He discusses cases with significant equity, where misreported forbearances lead to wrongful foreclosures. As an expert, Doug assesses damages, enhancing case strength and win odds against bureaus and creditors by leveraging his mortgage expertise, often halting foreclosures or securing settlements.

In Episode 12 of "Expert Witness," hosts Doug Miner and Steven Palmieri discuss how the credit reporting industry disputes inaccurate data, focusing on divorce-related credit issues. Doug, a seasoned expert witness, explains that if inaccuracies persist, consumers can sue creditors or bureaus. He highlights how divorce decrees often fail to shield ex-spouses from joint debt, leading to credit damage. As an expert, Doug quantifies damages, strengthening cases and boosting win odds against bureaus and creditors by leveraging his mortgage and credit repair expertise, often settling disputes pre-litigation.

In Episode 11 of "Expert Witness," host Steven Palmieri interviews James Wilhite, an arbitration specialist in credit repair. James explains how the credit reporting industry disputes inaccurate data using arbitration clauses in contracts, particularly against utility and credit card companies. If errors persist, consumers can sue bureaus and creditors. His expertise in leveraging arbitration strengthens consumer cases, often forcing settlements or deletions, increasing win odds against unprepared creditors by exploiting their reluctance to engage in costly arbitration processes.