Rob Reiner WHO KILLED JFK

desription coming

The researchers are so supset he included Tosh Plumley, it seems to be all they care about. But none of them care that he believes Paul Landis. Groubert nails the Landis project here- https://rumble.com/v6qen0w-groubert-landis-book-is-a-ds-op-and-written-by-james-robenalt-identical-to-.html I think there's some truth to the case Phil Nelson made for Plumlee although ultimately he may be wrong https://lbjthemasterofdeceit.com/2021/06/13/in-defense-of-tosh-plumlee-how-his-critics-unintentionally-help-to-vindicate-him-and-his-story-of-that-day/ as I believe he was about LBJ and Judyth Baker. DiEugenio wrote a series of negative reviews- https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/rob-reiners-who-killed-jfk https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/rob-reiners-who-killed-jfk-pt-2 https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/rob-reiners-who-killed-jfk-pt-3 https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/rob-reiners-who-killed-jfk-pt-4 He too, complains about using Plumlee as a source for contested claim (Oswald defector training in Nags Head ), then he cites E Howard Hunt for one. Really nitpicks everything and so many suggestions what should have been there, it wouldn't have been Reiner's story, it would have been DiEugenio's. Maybe this is why he didn't consult DiEugenio on the podcast, as he had for the TV show. I don't think he wanted DiEugenio telling him what to say every 5 min. And for me, I'd much rather hear Reiner's unproven theory on Nag's Head, which makes sense that's he'd get trained since he undertook that job, and more circumstantially that he was in NC since he contacted John Hurt with his supposed last phone call. I enjoyed that story and I was glad not to hear another recounting of the candy box falling down on LHO's mommy's nose. Everyone who listens to this podcast and develops enough interest to learn about this on their own will hear that story. I think Crumpton tells it well here- https://rumble.com/v6rxj8r-oswalds-records-in-the-marines-discrepancies-cia-connections-matt-crumpton-.html So I don't care much for these reviews from DiEugenio. The first time listener hearing about this doesn't need to have every detail fact-checked, he'll do it himself later or he'll forget the various details altogether, so it isn't important. Another thing is someone I believe mischaracterized Reiner's position inthe DiEugneio comment, and JD did not correct, he agreed with the guy (and gave more interesting background). The guy said Reiner claimed in the Black Op Radio interview that the CIA was staging a fake assassination whic got real, unintentionally. That's not my impression, but he does seem to suggest Harvey and the others weren't taking orders from higher up, but rogue agents on their own. That is retarded but not nearly as bad as characterized. What I believe Reiner will say is there was an abort team, per Plumley. If real that would mean there were factions in the CIA that weren't in on it or had a contingency plan to take the credit if it were foiled, or not take the blaim. something like that. Not that they killed him on accident. This is the interview, I didn't here anything like JD and his commenter described- https://rumble.com/v4angni-black-op-radio-1184-guest-rob-reiner.html What I heard is Reiner has studied this a long time and he wanted to put out what he knows, and consolidate the decades of findings into one streamlined account. Then people can find out about two brains at the autopsy if they want more. I'll post my own, far less detailed writeup about this when I post the last combo. I will make this into a 5 part series of longer shows instead of 11 little ones. I skipped ep 2 except the trailer but you can read about it above. Will certainly skip the Landis bonus ep. But You can read about all of that in JD's substack above. Here is a positive writeup with spoilers so don't read if you're waiting for the last show- https://randallbeach.substack.com/p/rob-reiner-names-four-shooters-in #Rob Reiner podcast #Who Killed JFK

ep 6 the Leadup ep 7 Unusual Bedfellows 11m intro. I put in some lesser known stuff I think is explosive, on Dulles & Angleton then links it into the Mob. This is the best one so far. Earlier shows- https://rumble.com/playlists/THEIHMnlyeQ Watch my Dulles compilation- https://rumble.com/v6qahiu-dulles-still-ran-cia-after-jfk-fired-him-installed-front-director-and-kille.html

Custom intro featuring Michael Franzese, who says CIA ordered the hit on Oswald. Second-to-last compilation, others here- https://rumble.com/playlists/THEIHMnlyeQ #Rob Reiner #Who Killed JFK Podcast

Posted this yesterday but one of my (4min) clips got zapped out of the sequence in the editor, not sure how. So this is the full compilation if anyone saw that. The supplementary compilation on Reiner's suspects is the last 45m. I made it because it was a bit of a let-down that he didn't give more info on the guys he named. This Ep. is not as good as the other ones in the series because he steps away from reviewing the literature and speculates on who he and Dick Russell think were on Dealey Plaza. His other episodes are really good, for the reason he gives in the opening interview here. 60 years of info condensed into 11 30m shows, the most important parts but the rabbit holes: body/casket shell game at the autopsy, Tippit and the evidence the Z Film is a forgery. So, these are the names, and he didn't prove it as advertised but they're not any worse than anyone else's list. HOWEVER, him saying that "rogue factions" did it is TOTALLY WRONG and sounds like something John Brennan might have put him up to. It was coordinated at the highest levels of government, by the govt. DoD involvement is undeniable after what Lifton and Horne uncovered about the autopsy and Z custody, and a whole-of-gov operation. It CANNOT be rogue factions. EWO has some interesting stuff about the CIA stealing NG equipment for Bay of Pigs, but that wasn't rogue operators, it was Bill Harvey running the point, it went all the way up the CIA's chain of command from him, and all those same guys were involved in the JFKA. It was CIA, JCS and US MIL. Reiner aired this before the Jack Ruby episode but I thought this one should be the last one. Reiner WKJFK Playlist- https://rumble.com/playlists/THEIHMnlyeQ Reiner's/Russell's SUSPECTS have some overlap with HANK ALBARELLI'S, and Russell wrote the forward for his book Coup in Dallas. I always wanted to figure Albarelli out but it's almost a completely different field of research. But I put it together as I made this and that's at the end. [SPOILERS BELOW] I got the idea from this show- https://rumble.com/v733zqe-reiner-morley-on-meeting-w-john-brennan-on-the-russia-hoax-and-his-jfk-proj.html ... that Reiner might have had some agreement with John Brennan to name CANNON and maybe who else to name- But JACK CANNON/CANON is one of Dick Russell's suspects. REINER NAMES THESE GUYS- Planning Dealey Plaza- GENERAL WILLOUGHBY BILL HARVEY Running the Oswald op and killing him with Ruby- DULLES, ANGLETON, ATLEE PHILLIPS Mechanics on Dealey Plaza- HERMENIO DIAZ (Trafficante's guy) CHARLES NICOLETTI (Giancana's guy) JACK CANON/CANNON JEAN RENE SOUETRE (different guy than Lucien Sarti) The clip series on Cannon is from Eyes Wide Open. Really good YT show and that season is underway and looking into Willoughby and Canon, so that will be the new Sunday program starting next week. Also looking through stuff about Albarelli & Lafitte. There's not a lot to look through, unless I read the book itself and run sections of it through the AI reader and I don't have time to do that and run this channel. But You'll get the idea at the end of this and you can pursue it if you want. Look up Anna's archive and Brave-AI search the other domains (last part of the URL after the last period.) it runs on besides .org, and you can get that book for free and numerous others, almost all of them actually. I've compiled a huge library of JFK books, mainly from there. Last clip with CORY HUGHES on Lafitt is as far as the free version goes, to see the full video join FKN.

Interview with Rob Reiner discussing his new JFK Assassination podcast. Actor and filmmaker Rob Reiner's new podcast on the JFK assassination <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6hD4xxJbvSRRyYoG196aSw" target="_blank">Who Killed JFK?</a> (Spotify) How Rob Reiner got interested in the case FREE Borrowable Ebook: <a href="https://archive.org/details/rushtojudgmentcr00lane" target="_blank">Rush to Judgement</a> (1967) by Mark Lane FREE Borrowable Ebook: <a href="https://archive.org/details/manwhoknewtoomuc0000russ" target="_blank">The Man Who Knew Too Much (Richard Case Nagell)</a> (revised) by Dick Russell James Angleton and Allen Dulles The podcast has been created in a way that makes it very easy for beginners to understand <a href="https://archive.org/download/OperationNorthwoods/operation_northwoods.pdf" target="_blank">Operation Northwoods</a> (PDF) George Joannides's role with the HSCA There maybe a book released in the near future based on the podcast

Memorial for Reiner who I dont think is dead either. I no longer believe stories about public figures' private lives. Despite the well-justified skepticism toward Reiner, who partook in the Russia hoax, it appears on further examination that his JFK work was genuine. But you never know. I think King and Fetzer are right that many researchers work for the other side. I believe after reading DiEugenio's tribute to Reiner, here- https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/31886-rob-reiner-and-wife-michele-are-dead/ that Reiner would have made an impactful tv series if Ted Gold had not been foolish with the title and got the project shuttered, the reason Reiner made that podcast. Larry Schnapf who helps Morely at JFKFacts says they will put out their long form interview with Russell this weekend on Reiner's death & the state of JFK.

from JFK Facts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PZhkWL5KHU Rob Reiner WHO KILLED JFK Playlist- https://rumble.com/playlists/THEIHMnlyeQ

Mark Lane Rush to Judgement Rob Reiner & Dick Russell Shooters Roselli & Mac Wallace TRANSCRIPT and AI Summaries- https://fullchan.net/?3c9b7441d0550b59#AwzAfKhtP9Gy7Wx8RP8gwV9wov4nFVVmrwbRESierE1m These guys dog everyone, there's some substance to their criticisms but they are Paramount Tactical style critics, in that they rarely account for the possibility of fraud, false documents, people being paid by the govt to lie. They really try hard to accuse people of being the kind of person who lies, and they never ask if so-and-so is part of an agency or organization or running an op for someone. I read a blistering criticism of Mellon's fingerprint study that they don't seem to be aware of. For one, that there were several fingerprints and she took ONE and acted like she debunked everything. For two those fingerprints were probably planted in the first place, for the Book Depository shooter hoax. Glen Semple was the first to name Mac Wallace, and he named him as an accomplice to Oswald. Then there were problems with Mellon's FBI guy's analysis and not addresses central components of the original proof (matching the planted fingerprint to the actual guy whose finger they made it from). It's a match IMO, she was wrong, and Wallace still wasn't the shooter. There's no reason to call a cheap thug, the mafia and CIA have seasoned pros, they don't need LBJ's connections either, and he didn't have the means as VP to alter the parade route and security protocols, or especially to run the autopsy show. Which PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT by itself the Mil Indistrial Complex Theory is *NOT* speculation. They also side with this guy Steve Roe, a shill associated with Fred Litwin, who to some degree debunked DiEugenio's claims in the Oliver Stone Serial/Movie Destiny Betrayed, and the magic bullet ce-399 custody.... Elmer Todd's initials were there the whole time he says, and research after researcher for years wasn't able to see them in person, vs now on the NIST digital "recreation".....so there's a pitfall to document-driven research, in a case where the government serially fabricates documents and other evidence, and you get some police report 60 years later to challenge the way the story was told, not the fact that he was arrested and was a CIA guy all that time involved with the people in question, well, maybe that police report is real, but it could also not be real, and either way you have a cia guy with said record arrested from the bank robbery, and they say he must have been robbing it for real. Well ok but if he was, that could be something he'd do to go to jail, anyway.