Landmark Case – Queen not valid

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca [email protected] Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support). Show less

U.K.: Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System - Queen not valid monarch Queen-elizabeth-unhappyLandmark Case Could Stymie Legal System Written by Debra Siddons If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days." For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH) Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the 12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of you less familiar with this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the following links:- http://mtrial.org http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/ 7/7/ Ripple effect http://jforjustice.co.uk/77/ There are two very important precedents that were established with this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was based on two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, and with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years. In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the second point. At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited. The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece of man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect. To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times, which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her other numerous crimes. All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "her majesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority from her. All cases brought by the state are "Regina vs. Xxxxxxx", which means they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn't really the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or the jurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do any of "her majesty's" courts or judges. Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth could lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are obviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is by a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury trial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth. No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority. That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days. The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the Laws of God. These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at the start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully. To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two pieces of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined. Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God. Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked awareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, but didn't know. We know now. For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, we aren't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all you really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the BAR. So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to this insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread the word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion can begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your freedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World Order". For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit: http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm#crimes By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this simple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a second precedent set during this landmark case. While the official reason for this trial was to address this trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice", the real reason for this trial was so the authorities could punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect" which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream media reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy theory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of people who see it." That's how powerful the truth really is. This was the first time this information was shown at an official proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the jurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London on July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For those unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of correcting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the outset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers" (who were also found not guilty). John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United States and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind Jane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the event. As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on record. And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of that official record. This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice sounding words, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of the hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up around us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and the courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of the personal cost. "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke by Debra Siddons REGINA/THE QUEEN V JAH LAWFUL ARGUMENT AGAINST JURISDICTION & SOVEREIGNTY 1. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s Fraudulent Coronation. The person who purports to be the queen has never, in fact, rightfully or Lawfully been crowned as the Sovereign. This knowledge stems from the fact that the Coronation Stone / The Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned upon is a fake. The real Coronation Stone; made from Bethel porphyry, weighing more than 4cwt. (458lbs.) according to the BBC telex in the film “The Coronation Stone”, (Covenant Recordings), and Ian R. Hamilton Q.C. in three of his books: “No Stone Unturned” (pages 36, 44), “A Touch of Treason” (page 50) and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny” (pages 27, 35); was removed from Westminster Abbey at 04:00 hrs on the 25th of December in 1950, by his group of four Scottish Nationalist students, which included and was led by Ian Robertson Hamilton himself. The other three were Alan Stuart, Gavin Vernon and Kay Matheson, as stated in his books. Further details at: http://jahtruth.net/stone.htm . The real Coronation Stone (“National Treasure No. 1”), was taken to Scotland where, in Glasgow, it was handed over to Bertie Gray to repair it, and was later hidden by industrialist and philanthropist John Rollo in his factory, under his office-floor, according to Ian R. Hamilton’s books – “No Stone Unturned” and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny”, and the factory-manager, when I visited him. A fake stone copy had previously been made in 1920 by stone-mason, Bertie Gray, for a prior plan to repatriate the Coronation Stone, and it was made of Scottish sandstone from a quarry near Scone in Perthshire, weighing 3cwt. (336lbs.). The conspirators had used it to practice with, before going to London to Westminster Abbey to remove the real Coronation Stone from the abbey. It was that fake stone copy which was placed on the High Altar Stone at Arbroath Abbey, at Midday on the 11th April of 1951, wrapped in a Scottish Saltyre (St. Andrew’s Flag – Dark blue with white diagonal cross on it) and found by the authorities, then transported to England, where it was used for the “queen’s” coronation, according to Bertie Gray’s children in a Daily Record Newspaper article. Link to Daily Record article The stone upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned weighs exactly 3cwt (336lbs.) as attested to by Historic Scotland in their official booklet titled “The Stone of Destiny”, “Symbol of Nationhood”, obtainable from Edinburgh Castle, published by Historic Scotland, (ISBN 1 900168 44 8), who have had the stone that she was crowned on in their care, in Edinburgh Castle, since it was returned to Scotland by John Major’s Conservative government in 1996. As previously stated, the genuine Coronation Stone weighs more than 4 cwt. (458lbs.), but the one that Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg was crowned on, that has been on display in Edinburgh Castle since 1996, weighs 336lbs, not 458lbs., and thus cannot be the genuine Coronation Stone, for that and other reasons, that I will go into in great and minute detail later, during the hearing on 9th May 2011. Therefore, never having been Lawfully crowned, she has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s “authority” comes from her. Further, and without prejudice to the above... 2. Some of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s other Crimes. Sample Crimes/Points of Law:- 1. Mrs. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg/Mountbatten; un-Lawfully residing in Buckingham Palace, London; also known by the criminal aliases Windsor and QE2, was knowingly and willfully, with malice-aforethought, fraudulently crowned on a fake Coronation Stone / Lia Fail / Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar on June 2nd in 1953, and has been fraudulently masquerading as the rightful British Sovereign/Crown for the last 58 years, which the Defendant can prove beyond doubt, and is a major part of why the fraudulent British so-called “crown” is attacking the Defendant with this false, malicious, frivolous, ridiculous and politically motivated charge. It is Mrs. Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg who should be arrested and charged; for her innumerable acts of high-treason against God and Christ, Whose church she falsely claims to head and in defiance of Whom she had herself fraudulently crowned, and Whom she has continued to rule in defiance of, and in opposition to, ever since; not the Defendant. 2. Allowing people to legislate in defiance of God’s Law (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32) that she swore and affirmed, in writing, to maintain to the utmost of her power (Exhibit 1), and, in many cases, actually reversing what The Law states into being the very opposite of it. She has fraudulently imprisoned and punished people for enforcing The Law themselves as God commands them to do, and thus un-Lawfully prevented or deterred others from doing so. She has given Royal-Assent to 3,401 Acts of Parliament (as of 24/03/2011) and thus broken The Law against legislating 3,401 times. The very first time she gave “Royal-Assent” to ANY “Act of Parliament”, or any other piece of legislation, or allowed Parliament or anyone to legislate, she broke her Coronation Oath and was thus no longer the monarch, with immediate effect, even if she had been Lawfully crowned in the first-place, which she most definitely was not. Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add to the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the Lord your God which I COMMAND you. 11:1 Therefore thou shalt love the Lord thy God, and keep His charge, and His Statutes, and His Judgments, and His Commandments, always. 12:8 Ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day, every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes. 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it. A Bill MUST have Royal Assent before it can become an Act of Parliament (law). http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage-bill/lords/lrds-royal-assent/ 3. Allowing the forming of political parties and demon-crazy (democracy) to divide, weaken, conquer and ruin the people (Deuteronomy 5:32, 17:20; Matthew 12:25). Deuteronomy 5:32 Ye shall observe to do therefore as the Lord your God hath commanded you: ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left. 17:20 That his (the Sovereign’s) heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, [to] the right hand, or [to] the left… Matthew 12:25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: 4. Removal of the death-penalty that is prescribed as the deterrent for capital crimes in The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; e.g. Sodomy (Deuteronomy 23:17; Leviticus 20:13); Pedophilia; Rape; Murder; Adultery; etc., thus encouraging these crimes, that are now legion. Deuteronomy 23:17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. Leviticus 20:13 If a man lie also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Etc., etc., etc. 5. Actually encouraging and promoting sodomy, by legalizing it, then further enacting un-Lawful anti-discrimination legislation, promoting it in schools, and giving knighthoods to high-profile sodomites in the music, film and fashion industries, instead of having them Lawfully executed as a deterrent to others. Music - Elton John Film - Ian McKellen of Stonewall; John Gielgud Fashion – Norman Hartnell knighted 1977 and Hardy Amies knighted 1989. 6. Enriching herself in defiance of God’s Law that she swore to uphold, at the expense of her subjects, driving them into debt-slavery (Egypt), poverty and homelessness (Deuteronomy 17:14-20). Including the collecting of graven-images and expensive jewellery (her famous art and Fabergé collections, etc.) Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me; 17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, WHOM THE LORD THY GOD SHALL CHOOSE (see Psalm 2): [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother. 17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt (slavery under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way. 17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold. 17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites: 17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes, to DO them: 17:20 That his heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, to the right hand, or to the left… 7. Legalising, facilitating and engaging in usury/interest, that has caused the ruin, bankruptcy and debt-slavery of the entire nation.http://jahtruth.net/greeneco.htm Deuteronomy 23:19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury/interest to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury: 8. Ignoring the “Year of Release,” where all debts are forgiven/cancelled every seven years, and the “Year of Jubilee” every fifty years, where all property is redistributed back to its owner and the wealth shared out, so that there will be no poor amongst the people. Deuteronomy 15:1 At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. 15:2 And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the Lord's release. 15:4 Save when (to the end that) there be no poor among you; … Leviticus 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim Liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a Jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. 9. Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg has also broken God’s Law by allowing the EU, which is not the British people’s racial brother, but is a stranger, to rule over you / us, in contravention of Deuteronomy 17:15. Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me; 17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest NOT set a stranger over thee, which [is] not thy brother. Deuteronomy 7:2 And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, [and] utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them: 7:3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. 7:4 For they will turn away thy son from following Me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. 7:5 But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. 7:6 For thou [art] an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that [are] upon the face of the earth. 7:7 The Lord did not set His love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye [were] the fewest of all people: 7:8 But because the Lord loved you, and because He would keep the Oath which He had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 7:9 Know therefore that the Lord thy God, He [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His Commandments to a thousand generations; 7:10 And repayeth them that hate (or disobey) Him to their face, to destroy them: He will not be slack to him that hateth (or disobeyeth) Him, He will repay him to his face. 7:11 Thou shalt therefore KEEP the Commandments, and the Statutes, and the Judgments, which I command thee this day, to DOthem. 7:12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these Judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee The Covenant and the mercy which He sware unto thy fathers: 7:13 And He will love thee, and bless thee, and multiply thee: He will also bless the fruit of thy womb, and the fruit of thy land, thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep, in the land which He sware unto thy fathers to give thee. 7:14 Thou shalt be blessed above all people: there shall not be male or female barren among you, or among your cattle. 7:15 And the Lord will take away from thee all sickness, and will put none of the evil diseases of Egypt, which thou knowest, upon thee; but will lay them upon all [them] that hate thee. 7:16 And thou shalt consume all the people which the Lord thy God shall deliver thee; thine eye shall have no pity upon them: neither shalt thou serve their gods; for that [will be] a snare unto thee. 7:17 If thou shalt say in thine heart, These nations [are] more than I; how can I dispossess them? 7:18 Thou shalt not be afraid of them: [but] shalt well remember what the Lord thy God did unto Pharaoh, and unto all Egypt (and pharaoh ruled the whole known world at that time); 7:19 The great temptations which thine eyes saw, and the signs, and the wonders, and the mighty hand, and the stretched out arm, whereby the Lord thy God brought thee out: so shall the Lord thy God do unto all the people of whom thou art afraid. 7:20 Moreover the Lord thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed. 7:21 Thou shalt not be affrighted at them: for the Lord thy God [is] among you, a mighty God and terrible. 7:22 And the Lord thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee. 7:23 But the Lord thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed. 7:24 And He shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them. 7:25 The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold [that is] on them, nor take [it] unto thee, lest thou be snared therein: for it [is] an abomination to the Lord thy God. 7:26 Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: [but] thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it [is] a cursed thing. 8:1 All the Commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers. 8:2 And thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, [and] to test thee, to know what [was] in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep His Commandments (Law), or not. God warned His people, YOU, the British-Israel people ( http://jahtruth.net/britca.htm ), in the Revelation/Apocalypse to John, to come out of the Mother of Harlots’, abominable (Rev. 17:5) Babylonian ( http://jahtruth.net/robab.htm ) Market System:- Revelation/Apocalypse 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, COME OUT of her, MY people, that ye take not part in her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues (punishment). 10. She has allowed Witchcraft and condoned it - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284449/100-UK-servicemen-class-pagans-MoD-reveals.html - and Satanism - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3948329.stm - in her/the realm and in her/the armed forces. Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Deuteronomy 18:9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. 18:10 There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a WITCH, 18:11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a WIZARD, or a necromancer (medium). 18:12 For all that do these things [are] an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee. 18:13 Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God (Matt. 5:48). Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven IS perfect. Deuteronomy 32:15 But the Beloved waxed fat, and rebelled: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered [withfatness]; then he forsook God [which] made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation. 32:16 They provoked Him to jealousy with strange [gods], with abominations provoked they Him to anger. 32:17 They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new [gods that] came newly up, whom your fathers feared not. Revelation/Apocalypse 21:7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my (adopted) son. 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and SORCERERS, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and brimstone: which is the second death. She has given an O.B.E. to Joanne "Jo" Rowling (J. K. Rowling), who promotes witchcraft, thus herself condoning the promotion of witchcraft, and the poisoning of the minds of the nation and its children. The other and major part of witchcraft/sorcery, that she has also allowed, and probably actually invested in, is the chemical and pharmaceutical industry that is slowly poisoning the nation through chemical-fertilizers, pesticides, chemtrails, vaccines, etc., and other pharmaceutical products/medicines/poisons (witches’ brews / potions) in order to maximize their profits, because they do not make any money from healthy people. That is why there are more sick people every year and a correspondingly higher NHS budget, rather than less sick people and a correspondingly shrinking NHS budget. The NHS, doctors and pharmacists are therefore obviously harming the population, not healing it. http://www.rense.com/general34/quotes.htm http://jahtruth.net/heal.htm Note well that it states in Revelation/Apocalypse 21:8 “ALL LIARS shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and Brimstone . . .” and the word Parliament means “Speaking Lies” from the French words Parler which means to speak, and mentir which means to tell lies. Also the word Politics, poly meaning many; tics are blood-sucking parasites; thus politics means many blood-sucking parasites. 11. Each and every single one of the above crimes carries the death-penalty, with public execution; under The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; for not doing so, along with all those who likewise reject The Law of God — Deuteronomy 17:8-13, 27:26; Malachi chapter 4. Deuteronomy 17:8 If there arise a matter too hard for thee in Judgment, between blood and blood, between plea and plea, and between stroke and stroke, being matters of controversy within thy gates: then shalt thou arise, and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall choose; 17:9 And thou shalt come unto the priests the Levites, and unto the judge that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they shall show thee The Sentence of Judgment: 17:10 And thou shalt do according to The Sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee: 17:11 According to The Sentence of The Law which they shall teach thee, and according to the Judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline to do The Sentence which they shall show thee, and turn not away from it to the right hand, nor to the left. 17:12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thus thou shalt put away the evil from Israel. 17:13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously (in thinking they are a law unto themselves). 27:26 Cursed be he (like Elizabeth) that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to DO them. Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill (in the Greek Original – pleroo = to fully preach it). 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, till ALL (the Prophecies) be fulfilled. 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least Commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of heaven. 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes (lawyers) and Pharisees (politicians), ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of heaven. James 2:10 He who breaks the least of these Commandments and teaches others to do so is guilty of all. The renowned English jurist Sir William Blackstone famously stated, “No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.” All of The Law references quoted are copied from the Sovereign’s Bible (Exhibit 2) upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’sCoronation Oath (Exhibit 1) was sworn (all emphasis mine), containing God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. It is a special large print and specially bound edition of the king James Authorised Version (1611) of the Holy Bible, that she placed her right hand upon, swore the Coronation Oath upon and then kissed, before she signed the Coronation Oath (Exhibit 1). 12. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg is therefore not only massively in breach of contract, but also massively in breach of The Law, and thus is not only NOT the Lawful Sovereign, never has been, and thus has NO jurisdiction to prosecute me, but is also a criminal, guilty of capital crimes, that carry the death-penalty, according to The Law she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. That Perfect Royal Law of Liberty was given by God to the British-Israel peoples to protect the British-Israel peoples from exploitation, oppression, poverty and harm, and which God has warned the British-Israel peoples to return to, with dire consequences for failure to do so. Her obscene wealth and that of her relatives, cronies and accomplices must be seized and shared out amongst the poor and homeless. Malachi 4:1 For, behold, the Day cometh, that shall burn like an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave of them neither root nor branch(nothing). 4:2 But unto you that fear My name shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. 4:3 And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in The Day that I shall do [this], saith the Lord of hosts. 4:4 Remember ye (and return to) The Law of Moses My servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, [with] the Statutes and Judgments. 4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the Lord: 4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse (see verse 1). 13. The person who purports to be queen was, in fact, as proven above, never rightfully nor Lawfully the Sovereign/Crown. Therefore the Crown/Prosecution/Regina has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s authority comes from her. 14. In addition, without prejudice to the above, based on God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power (Exhibit 1) the “queen” is in breach of contract. She has amongst other things accumulated a large amount of personal wealth and done many other things that are expressly forbidden, some of which are listed above, and so she has breached her contract with God and the British-Israel people. Therefore, even if, which is not admitted, the “queen” was genuinely crowned, the breach of contract disqualifies her from sitting and renders null and void proceedings instituted in her name. It is therefore of the utmost importance that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg and the Sovereign’s Bible, that is kept in Lambeth Palace*, be present in court on May 9th for my challenge to her jurisdiction and sovereignty to be heard, and for me to face my false-accuser, examine her and have her arrested. * Class-Mark Ref. No.: E185 1953 [**] Signed: _______________________ Date: 31/03/2011