Russian collusion evidence

Former CIA Director John Brennan says the CIA pays people to be spies and then blackmails them He doesn’t consider it “Blackmail” because it’s about “National Security” “It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about” “Agents, the people that you recruit, foreign citizens, if they are hesitant to continue to spy for you, you can remind them that when they were first recruited and they signed a sheet of paper saying that they had taken some money from us, which is usually what happens, that you could remind them about that almost as a way to scare them into continuing to work with you. So the pressure — It sounds like blackmail — It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about. You have to do whatever you can in order to keep people working for the CIA.” https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1998537463590175132?s=20

UNKNOWN FEMALE: “Thank you, Counselor. Justice Thomas?” Thomas: “Just so I’m clear, is there any First Amendment interest in coordinated expenditures?” ELIAS: “Your Honor, I think that there is an interest, a First Amendment interest in coordinated expenditures in two regards. Number one, there is an interest anytime any entity or person wishes to make a contribution to a political committee, they are expressing First Amendment speech. They are engaged in First Amendment speech. Buckley said that that is satisfied by allowing them to contribute. So essentially, the speech is in the first dollar. It is in showing support for that candidate. And that’s why the contribution limits could be $3,500. Because the idea to contribution of the candidates, because though the donor is engaged in First Amendment activity, engaged in First Amendment speech, it is essentially symbolic speech. It’s the act of giving money. So that’s number one. Number two, I — again, I think this case would be a very different one if the as-applied challenge, first of all, if it was an as-applied challenge, but second, if it was an as-applied challenge where what the party wanted was its own speech, and it wanted to coordinate that speech with the candidate. That would pose a very different case. And there would be different considerations on how that could be limited, which is why in 1996, the brief of the Democratic Party went to what the scope of coordination was, that there should be less of a sweep of what is considered coordinated. But if you’re saying is their First Amendment speech with respect to paying the bills of a campaign so that the campaign staff stayed at a hotel, it is just in the act of making the donation. It’s just in the act of making the in-kind contribution.” Thomas: “I still don’t understand what you’re saying. If the party coordinates with the candidate and pays the bill, is that speech or does that have a First Amendment protection, or is it simply, as you say, a bill-paying exercise?” ELIAS: “It is speech. It is speech. And under Buckley, what it is treated as is a contribution. And therefore, though it is speech, it is subject to limit by Congress on how much can be spent in engaging in that speech.”

Boom. The Mar-A-Lago raid may be the ultimate boomerang that backfires on the deep state. "Four grand juries are currently gathering evidence. At some point, they'll roll them up, and they'll take them to Fort Pierce, Florida. That's where the raid on Donald Trump was litigated...There is a sweet irony to the fact that that's where the boomerang may end up. All the litigation Jack Smith did is the final act of the conspiracy. It's the same conspiracy. Hillary has a problem: Russia Collusion. Hunter Biden has a problem: Ukraine impeachment. Joe Biden has a classified problem: Donald Trump is going to have a problem.... The final act of the conspiracy is the cover-up of Joe Biden's classified documents by charging President Trump and you work your way back." Kash Patel in 2022: "Now you have a six-year saga of criminal activity from Russiagate to the raid. It's the same people who started and launched Russiagate that are now supervising and doing the Mar-A-Lago raid... And the mainstream media is covering and applauding it... This same crew want to hide from the public the 40% of documents that Devin and I found during Russiagate but were unable to get out to the public. The documents that President Trump declassified....Stay tuned. All roads begin and end with Russiagate and I think we are going to be proven right."

Kash Patel just proved through declassified documents that Adam Schiff was directing the leaking of classified documents in an attempt to stop Trump. There is a reason why Kash told us Adam Schiff was the worst criminal in congress in the last 250 years. It was so bad, what he was doing, that people thought he was committing tCongressreasonous crimes. Think about this. Donald Trump was impeached by people like Adam Schiff based off a continual hoax and literal coup. Adam Schiff should be charged for more than just mortgage fraud. That should be the least of his worries. He was a major player in the the attempt to overthrow a duly elected President of the United States and he should suffer the consequences.