Exposing Real History Of The Nation Of Islam & Is Not Religion Of Peace And Justice The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws

Brief Overview of the History of Israel The land which is today the country of Israel has been sacred to the Jewish people for thousands of years. Today the land is also sacred to other religions such as Christianity. In 2000 BC, the Jewish Patriarch Abraham was promised the land of Israel by God. This is a timeline of modern Israeli history, comprising important legal and territorial changes and political events in Israel and its predecessor states, along with important events which influenced the Zionist movement. To read about the background to these events, see History of Israel. Here is a timeline beginning around 1948, including the latest violence in the Gaza Strip: ... The Ottoman Empire had controlled that part of the Middle East from the early 16th century until control of most of the region was granted to the British after World War I. Both Israelis and Palestinians were struggling for self-determination and sovereignty over the territory, developing respective movements for their causes. Timeline and History Overview - Israel Timeline BCE 1700s - Abraham settles in the land of Israel (Canaan). 1500 - Joseph is sold into slavery. His family join him in Egypt. 1400s - The Hebrews are enslaved by the Egyptians. Baby Moses Being Rescued 1300 - Moses leads the Hebrews out of Egypt. 1200s - The Hebrews arrive in Israel. 1020 - Saul is crowned the first King of Israel. 1000 - David becomes King of Israel. 922 - Israel is split into two nations: Israel in the north and Judah in the south. 722 - The Assyrians conquer the Northern Kingdom. 586 - Babylon, ruled by Nebuchadnezzar II, conquers Judah and destroys the Temple and takes many Israelites captive. 538 - Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, conquers Babylonia. He allows the Jewish people to return home. The Tower of David 516 - The Second Temple is constructed in Jerusalem. 322 - The Greeks, led by Alexander the Great, conquer Israel along with all of Persia and Egypt. 167 - The Maccabean revolt occurs and brings independence to the Jews. 63 - Rome, led by Pompey the Great, conquers Israel. 37 - Herod the Great is made King of Israel by Rome. CE 30 - Jesus Christ is crucified. 70 - The Romans destroy the Second Temple and much of Jerusalem. 73 - The last of the Jewish rebels are defeated at Masada. 132 - The Jewish people revolt against Roman rule. Hundreds of thousands of Jews are killed. The Western Wall 200 - The Mishnah, the first portion of the Talmud, is written down. This is the oral traditions and law of the Jewish people. 350 - The Jerusalem version of the Talmud is completed. Another version, the Babylonian version, will be compiled around 500 CE. 614 - The Persians capture Jerusalem after the Siege of Jerusalem. 629 - The Byzantine Empire recaptures Jerusalem. 638 - Muslim forces capture Jerusalem. 691 - The Dome of the Rock is built on the Temple Mount. 1071 - The Seljuk Turks take control of Jerusalem and forbid Christians from entering the city. 1096 - Christians in Europe embark on the First Crusade. 1099 - Crusaders take control of Jerusalem. 1187 - Saladin, the Sultan of Egypt, captures Jerusalem. Jews are allowed to enter the city. 1517 - The Ottoman Empire conquers the Mamluk Sultanate and takes control of Israel. Suleiman the Magnificent rebuilds much of Jerusalem. The Ottoman Empire will rule until the 1900s. Modern Day Israel 1914 - World War I begins. 1917 - The Ottoman Empire is defeated by the British. 1920 - The British take over Israel as part of the Palestine Mandate. 1939 - World War II begins. During the war 6 million Jewish people will be killed by Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany in the Holocaust. 1945 - World War II comes to an end. 1948 - The independent country of Israel is declared. The first Prime Minister of Israel is David Ben-Gurion. Golda Meir 1948 - Israel is attacked by a coalition of Arab countries including Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon in the first Arab-Israeli War. The Israelis win the war. 1949 - The first Knesset (Israeli assembly) is held. Israel becomes a member of the United Nations. 1956 - The Suez Crisis occurs when Egypt takes control of the Suez Canal. 1967 - The Six-Day War is fought between Israel and a group of Arab nations including Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq. Israel won the war and took control of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights. 1969 - Golda Meir is elected Prime Minister. She is the first woman prime minister of Israel. 1973 - The Yom Kippur War takes place when Egypt and Syria attack Israel on the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur. Israel was able to push back the Egyptian army. 1979 - Israel signs a peace treaty with Egypt at Camp David in the United States. 1980 - The Shekel becomes the official currency of Israel replacing the Israeli lira. Begin and Sadat 1991 - The Gulf War occurs. Israel is hit by Scud missiles from Iraq. 2009 - Benjamin Netanyahu is elected prime minister. Brief Overview of the History of Israel The land which is today the country of Israel has been sacred to the Jewish people for thousands of years. Today the land is also sacred to other religions such as Christianity. In 2000 BC, the Jewish Patriarch Abraham was promised the land of Israel by God. Abraham's descendents became the Jewish people. The Kingdom of Israel emerged around 1000 BC and was ruled by great kings such as King David and Solomon. Over the next 1000 plus years various empires would take control of the land. These included the Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Empires. In the 7th century the land was taken over by the Muslims. Later, the land would change hands a few times until the Ottoman Empire took control in 1517. The Ottoman Empire ruled until the 1900s. During the rule of the Arabs and the Ottoman Empire, the Jewish nation had dispersed throughout the world. Many millions lived in European countries. During World War II, Nazi Germany had hoped to exterminate the Jewish people through the Holocaust. Millions of Jewish people were executed and killed in concentration camps. After the end of World War II the United Nations divided up Israel between Arab and Jewish states. The Arabs rejected this division. On May 14, 1948 the Jewish people in the area proclaimed independence, naming their country Israel. Egypt, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon immediately attacked and the 1948 Arab-Israeli War began. After a year of fighting a ceasefire was declared and temporary borders were established. Hostilities continued between the Arabs and the Israelis in a series of wars including the Yom Kippur War in 1973. Today the tensions and hostility still exists between the two. https://jcpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/TimeLine.pdf Israel's History ​ Why it’s so important to understand a brief overview of the historical periods of Israel. The Holy Land is an old place, about the oldest in the world! While in the Holy Land, you’ll be seeing things as old as 6,000 years. That’s old! Different periods of history will be referred to when describing Israel’s holy sites and places. Please realize that there will likely be several key events at a particular site that have taken place there. Each event will have happened during a specific period in Israel’s history. If you can understand the different periods a little, you’ll get much more out of your experience. Chronology of Time Used by Archaeologists and Historians Early Bronze Age 4000–2000 BC Middle Bronze Age 2000–1500 BC Late Bronze Age 1500–1200 BC Iron 1 Age 1200–1000 BC Iron 2 Age 1000–586 BC Canaanite Period 4000–1875 BC 4000 BC – Canaanites inhabit the land of Israel. 2500 BC – Noah and the Great Flood. 2100 BC – Tower of Babel 2095 BC – Abraham moves to the land of Canaan from Ur of the Chaldeans. 1880 BC – Jacob and his family move to Egypt to live with Joseph. Israelite Period 1450–965 BC 1450 BC – Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt. 1406 BC – Nation of Israel enters the Promised Land. 1012 BC – King Saul unifies the 12 Hebrew tribes into the United Kingdom of Israel. 1004–965 BC – King David's reign. First Temple Period 965–586 BC 965–925 BC – King Solomon’s reign; glory years of the Kingdom of Israel. 950 BC – Solomon builds the magnificent temple on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem (same place Abraham intended to sacrifice Isaac). 926 BC – Kingdom of Israel divides because of Solomon’s sins. Jeroboam reigns over the northern Kingdom of Israel from Samaria. Rehoboam reigns over the southern Kingdom of Israel from Jerusalem. 722 BC – Assyrians conquer and deport most of the northern Kingdom of Israel to Assyria. 586 BC – Babylonians conquer Jerusalem and Judah under Nebuchadnezzar and deport most of the southern Kingdom of Judah to Babylon. Second Temple Period 538–444 BC 538 BC – Many Jews return from Babylon; Second Temple began to be rebuilt under the leadership of Zerubbabel. 515 BC – Completion and Dedication of the Temple 458 BC – Ezra returns to Jerusalem with a second wave of Jews and teaches all Israelites about the Bible. 444 BC – Nehemiah returns to Jerusalem to rebuild the city walls. Hellenistic Period (Greek Rule) 333–167 BC 333 BC – Alexander the Great defeats the Persian Empire and sets out to conquer the world. After his sudden death in 323 BC, the Greek Empire is divided. During this period, the Bible is translated into Greek (the Septuagint). Hasmonean Period (Maccabean Rule) 167–63 BC 167 BC – When the Jews were prohibited from practicing Judaism, and their temple was desecrated as part of an effort to impose Greek-oriented culture and customs on the entire population, the Jews revolted. First led by Mattathias of the priestly Hasmonean family and then by his son Judah the Maccabee, the Jews subsequently entered Jerusalem and purified the temple. This purification of the temple is remembered by the Jewish Holiday, Hanukkah (164 BC). Roman Period (Roman Rule) 63 BC–313 AD 63 BC – Jerusalem is captured by Roman general Pompey. 37 BC–4 BC – Herod, Roman vassal king, rules the Land of Israel. He enlarges the Temple Mount and rebuilds the temple. He also builds other monumental projects, including Caesarea, Herodian, Cave of the Patriarchs, and Masada. 4 BC – Jesus is born in Bethlehem. 27–30 AD – Ministry of Jesus. 30 AD – Jesus crucified. 66 AD – Jewish revolt against the Romans. 70 AD – Destruction of Jerusalem and Second Temple. 74 AD – Fall of Masada. 132 AD – Bar Kokhba Revolt. Roman Emperor Hadrian destroys Jerusalem and builds Aelia Capitolina, a pagan city in its place. Many holy sites are preserved, but with pagan shrines on them. Byzantine Period (Eastern Roman Empire Rule) 313–614 AD 313 – Emperor Constantine recognizes Christianity, later becoming a Christian himself. 326 – Constantine’s mother, Helena, goes to the Holy Land and builds many churches and basilicas on holy sites. Persian Period 614–628 AD 614 – Persian conquest of the Holy Land. Many churches and monasteries destroyed. 628 – Holy Land recaptured by the Byzantines. Muslim/Arab Period 638–1099 AD 638 – Muslim/Arab conquest of the Holy Land completed. Rule is by Caliphs from Damascus, then from Baghdad, and then Egypt. 691 – On top of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem, the Dome of the Rock is built by Caliph Abd el-Malik. Crusader Period 1099–1291 AD 1099 – Crusaders (Catholic armies from Rome) conquer Jerusalem and many parts of Israel. 1147 – Second Crusade arrives in the Holy Land. 1187 – Destruction of the Crusader army by Muslim leader Saladin. Collapse of Crusader Kingdom begins. 1265 – Mamelukes, led by Sultan Beybars, conquer the Holy Land. 1270 – Final Crusade arrives, and all its participants are massacred. 1291 – Last Crusader stronghold of Acco taken, ending Crusader rule. Mamluk (Muslim) Period 1291–1517 AD 1291 – Mamluk rule begins. 1333 – Franciscan Order established in Jerusalem. Its members care for holy places and pilgrims. By the end of the Middle Ages, the country’s urban centers were virtually in ruins, most of Jerusalem was abandoned, and the small Jewish community was poverty-stricken. The period of Mamluk decline was darkened by political and economic upheavals, plagues, locust invasions, and devastating earthquakes. Ottoman (Muslim) Period 1517–1917 AD 1517 – Following the Ottoman conquest in 1517, the land was divided into four districts and attached administratively to the province of Damascus and ruled from Istanbul. 1520 – Suleiman the Magnificent rebuilds the city walls of Jerusalem. 1799 – Napoleon Bonaparte invades Israel but fails to capture it and is forced to leave. 1860 – The first neighborhood, Mishkenot Sha'ananim, is built outside of Jerusalem’s city walls. 1882 – First large-scale immigration to Israel, mainly from Russia. 1904 – Second large-scale immigration from Russia and Poland. British Period 1917–1948 AD 1917 – British Foreign Minister Lord Balfour issued on November 2, 1917, the so-called Balfour Declaration, which gave official support for the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” with the commitment not to be prejudiced against the rights of the non-Jewish communities. 1947 – The United Nations approved the partition of Israel into separate Jewish and Arab states on November 29, 1947. State of Israel Period 1948 to Present 1948 – On the day when the British Mandate in Palestine expired, the State of Israel was instituted on May 14, 1948, by the Jewish National Council under the presidency of David Ben Gurion. 1948–1949 – The Arab-Israeli War; the Arabs refused to accept the newly established State of Israel. Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Lebanon, and Iraq attack Israel, but within a year, Israel defeated its attackers. 1950 – Western Jerusalem was proclaimed the capital city of Israel on January 23, 1950. 1956 – The Suez Crisis: Israelis invade Egyptian territory in October of 1956. 1956 – After Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the company that administered the Suez Canal, a joint attack by the French and British was launched. Egypt suffered military disaster in November 2, 1956. Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula, but after international condemnation, Israel was forced to withdraw. 1967 – Six-Day War: after Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran on May 22, 1967, Israel launched an attack on Egyptian, Jordanian, Syrian, and Iraqi airports on June 5, 1967. After six days, Israel conquered Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, Sinai, and the West Bank. 1973 – Yom Kippur War: on October 6, 1973, on the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, Syria and Egypt launched a surprise attack against Israel. After initial success of the attackers, Israel managed to cross the Suez into Egypt and endangered Cairo. After the intervention of the USA and USSR, military operations ended on October 25, 1973. 1978 – The Camp David Accord was signed by Israeli Prime Minister Menahen Begin, and Egyptian President Anvar as Sadat in September 1978, in Camp David, USA. Israel agreed to withdraw from the occupied Sinai Peninsula. 1979 – The Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty was signed on March 26, 1979, in Washington. https://www.holylandsite.com/israel-history-timeline The land of Israel has been populated by the Jewish people since 2000 BC. Here's the timeline, in case you didn't realize that it is their homeland, as designated by Yahweh. 1900 BC: Abraham chosen by God as the Father of the Jewish Nation. 1900 BC: Isaac, Abraham's son, rules over Israel. 1850 BC: Jacob, son of Issac, rules over Israel. 1400 BC: Moses leads the people out of Egypt and back to Israel. 1010 BC: King David unites the 12 tribes into one nation. 970 BC: King Solomon, son of David, builds the first temple structure in Jerusalem 930 BC: Israel is divided into two kingdoms, the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah. 800s BC: The rise of the prophets, God's messengers. 722 BC: Kingdom of Israel is conquered by Assyrians. 605 BC: Kingdom Judah is conquered by the Babylonians. 586 BC: Solomon's Temple is destroyed by the Babylonians. 539 BC: Persians conquer the Babylonians and take control of Israel. 538 BC: The Jews return to Israel from exile. 520 BC: The Temple is rebuilt. 450 BC: Reforms made by Ezra and Nehemiah. 433 BC: Malachi is the end of the prophetic age. 432 BC: The last group of Jews return from exile. 333 BC: The Greeks conquer the Persian empire. 323 BC: The Egyptian and Syrian empire take over Israel. 167 BC: Hasmonean's recapture Israel, and the Jews are ruled independently. 70 BC: Romans conquer Israel. 20 BC: King Herod builds the "third" temple 6 BC: Jesus Christ is born in Bethlehem 70 AD: Romans destroy the temple After that, the people were captives to the Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, and Crusaders. Through all of these events, the Jewish people continued to live in Israel. There were more or less of them, depending on the centuries, but there was never a time when the Jews didn't live in the land. They stayed, they built their communities, they raised their families, practiced their faith and they suffered at the hands of many outside rulers, but they always kept their faith. It is what sustains them, even now. In 1948, the UN established the State of Israel, the nation of Jews. Don't buy the Palestinian lies that they are entitled to the land. It simply is not true. Yahweh will also provide a way for his chosen people to live in Israel, as He has for thousands of years. Pray for the people of Israel. Are most Palestinian families originally from Palestine? No. My ancestors originate from near the Iraqi / Jordanian border. While part of my family started settling in what used to be called British Mandate Palestine, other parts of my family moved east to Baghdad. As children and young teenagers my paternal grandfather would tell me and my sister all kinds of lovely stories about his life, adventures, and businesses he used to own in Baghdad. One recurring topic was the exodus of Iraq’s Jewish communities, which he always called a great national catastrophe and personal tragedy. Iraq’s Jewish communities were one of the main import / export trading backbones and so when these communities disappeared their excellent trading connections and business relationships disappeared with them as well, as did much of the wealth they had generated and that helped sustain much of Iraqi society. This had the rather unfortunate side effect and consequence that many Arab companies, including my grandfather’s companies, slowly but surely went out of business, because they depended to a large extent on the excellent trade relationships Iraq’s Jewish communities had established and maintained for generations. My grandfather never had a bad word to say about the Jewish families with whom he did business. In fact he always told us they were the most fair, reliable, and trustworthy business people one could hope to call ones friends. To this very day my father and mother maintain that opinion and memory, because they are both old enough to remember Jordan’s iron fist occupation of the West Bank and every subsequent conflict since then. They used to tell us stories about the nationalistic lunacy that spread like wildfire throughout the West Bank and eventually resulted in the creation of the PLO, which of course wasn’t merely happy waging its ridiculous and bloody war of attrition against Israel, but also thought it wise and clever to publicly call for the overthrow of Jordan’s Hashemite Monarchy. Thanks to the excellent, fair, and honest experiences my grandfather had enjoyed with the Jewish communities in Iraq, our grandparents and parents always trusted Israeli leaders more than our own, which is why we never fled and have always remained in more or less the same part of the West Bank in which our ancestors settled. Since I and my family believe in peaceful coexistence and normalisation with liberal and pluralist Israel, we don’t see any reason why we should have to return to Jordan. However, we can understand why many Israelis think that way. Our Arab and Palestinians leaders have steadfastly refused to accept anything and everything ever offered to them that didn’t first and foremost include the eradication of all the Jews in what used to be known as British Mandate Palestine. When Anwar Sadat eventually and very bravely made peace with Israel he was assassinated by Muslim fanatics who later on went on to attack the USA in the first World Trade Center bombing of 1993. Our Palestinian leaders have never been interested in peace with Israel or the West for that matter. As already mentioned above, the PLO even thought it a good idea to try and topple and wage war against Jordan’s Hashemite Monarchy in 1970, which didn’t exactly work out too well for us either. While our Arab leaders were either fighting each other or trying to exterminate Israel, Israelis made the desert bloom, fought off countless attacks against overwhelming odds, and have made their country into the world’s most successful, liberal and pluralist high-tech startup nation. Meanwhile history has spoken and we Palestinians still keep running full speed ahead and fully armed towards the wrong side of history, which these days is nothing more than an impenetrable concrete wall / wire fence that wouldn’t need to divide anything or anybody, if it were not so necessary and successful keeping Israelis safe from our relentlessly murderous Palestinian terrorist attacks. Over the past couple of weeks Palestinian and Israeli women have marched together for peace only to be denounced by both Hamas and the BDS movement (that ironically enough always claims to be in favour of peace and against terrorism, yet clearly prefers siding with murderous Islamic terrorists instead of harmless female peace activists). It’s time for Israeli and Western liberals to realise Israeli politicians on both the right and left side of the political spectrum can continue offering peace to our Palestinian leaders as much and often as they like, safe in the knowledge our Palestinian leaders will always and forever turn down every single offer, regardless of how generous it is, unless it includes the destruction of the State of Israel and the exodus of all Jews. That said, hope dies last, as they say. For what little it’s worth, I and my wife hope for the sake of all children and grandchildren on both sides of the divide that peace is in the offing - sooner rather than later. If you liked my answer or comment, please be so kind and „Upvote“ it and also consider following me. The more public support and followers I receive, the safer it is (in theory at least) for me here in the West Bank to speak my mind as freely as possible and advocate for peaceful coexistence and normalisation between our two people. In pre 1948 Palestine the indigenous population consisted of the descendants of Arab, Druze, Greek, Turkish and other immigrants throughout history. The great majority, though, were made up of the descendants of Jews - Jews who converted to Christianity, Jews who converted to Islam and the Jews who did not convert. They all spoke Arabic and as such they may be classed as linguistic Arabs. The last group that we need to include in the mix are the Jewish refugees from Europe. These people spoke Yiddish from which they developed something called Modern Hebrew which is not Hebrew at all but a mixture of Slavic and Yiddish with a smattering of scriptural/liturgical Hebrew. Hence modern Hebrew may be thought of as a Creole language. “The genetic profile of Palestinians has, for the first time, been studied by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene variability and haplotypes. The comparison with other Mediterranean populations by using neighbor-joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses reveal that Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians. Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times.” The origin of Palestinians and their genetic relatedness with other Mediterranean populations The genetic profile of Palestinians has, for the first time, been studied by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene variability and haplotypes. The comparison with other Mediterranean populations by using neighbor-joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses reveal that Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians. Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times. Thus, Palestinian-Jewish rivalry is based in cultural and religious, but not in genetic, differences. The relatively close relatedness of both Jews and Palestinians to western Mediterranean populations reflects the continuous circum-Mediterranean cultural and gene flow that have occurred in prehistoric and historic times. This flow overtly contradicts the demic diffusion model of western Mediterranean populations substitution by agriculturalists coming from the Middle East in the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition. Who were the native people of palestine? There were a number of Canaanite tribes, who were the first inhabitants of the land of whom we have any knowledge. Historical evidence (as opposed to religious mythology) tells us that the Jewish people, referred to then as Hebrews or Israelites, emerged from among the Canaanite peoples; they were not foreign immigrants or invaders. Over a period of time, the Jewish people grew ascendant in the land. Some of the other tribes were absorbed, and became part of the Jewish people. The notion of twelve tribes, descending from the twelve sons of Jacob, also known as Israel, was probably a symbolic way of building connections and mutual identity among the disparate tribes. The Israelites, or Jews, were the only people to ever rule an independent kingdom or country in that land; for the rest of human history, the land you call Palestine was part of one conquering empire or another, colonized and ruled from afar. Of the Canaanite tribes, only the Jewish people or Israelites still exist today, and retain their identity. The other Canaanites were either absorbed into the Jewish people, or assimilated into one or another of the various conquering cultures, and lost their individual identities. An offshoot of the Jewish people, known as the Samaritans, also still survive today, with a distinct identity. The name “Palestine”, by the way, was first used by the Greeks, to refer to the part of the land, roughly corresponding to Gaza, that was invaded and ruled for a while by an Aegean sea people known as the Philistines (Plishtim, in Hebrew). The Roman Empire later renamed the entire land of Israel or Judea, as it was known for about 1000 years, and called it “Syria Palaestina”. This renaming, after the historical enemies of the Jewish people, was a deliberate insult, in revenge for a Jewish rebellion that almost succeeded in throwing off Roman rule. That Roman renaming of the land is the reason that it became known as Palestine. That happened in 135 CE. From then until 1948, the Jewish people were sometimes referred to as Palestinians. They were the only ones known by that name, though it was not a name they generally used for themselves. When other groups attempted to use it to refer to the Arabs who lived in the region, in the 1800’s and 1900’s, the Arabs adamantly insisted that only Jews were Palestinians, and Arabs were either just Arabs, or Syrians. In 1948, when the State of Israel achieved independence (after a Mandate period, during which the British government violated its mandate multiple times, by giving away much of the land to create an Arab country, called Jordan, allowing unchecked Arab immigration into the land, and preventing or limiting Jewish immigration, when it was charged with facilitating Jewish return to their ancestral land), the Jewish people discarded the name “Palestine”, and restored one of the ancient native names for the land, Israel. Two decades later, in a bold propaganda move, the Arabs who were trying to destroy Israel and claim the land as an Arab state declared themselves to be “Palestinians”, in the hope that people would forget when and how they adopted the name, and would associate Arabs with the land’s history. Edited to add: Comments consisting of anti-Israel propaganda, personal attacks, and racist insults will be reported and then deleted. The race that Palestinians are considered to belong to, is going to depend on what country Palestinians are placed in. This is because race is a social construct. If race means clearly delineated groups with more in common, physically, with each other than other races, then race is a social construct. Human physical characteristics change gradually over large areas and there are no clearly delineated groups. To give an example tell me who is white and who is South Asian, or middle eastern. Greeks, turks, Azeris, persians, baluchis, pashtuns, punjabis. Each group has much in common physically with the one beside it but most people would say theres a line somewhere that seperates them into groups. No matter where the line is, it appears arbitrary. Back to the original question, when i lived in Bahrain my facial features and dark hair meant that i was considered a light skinned middle easterner. People assumed I was Lebanese. Most Palestinians got the same treatment. In the US I am considered white, and actually all middle easterners are considered white by the census bureau. That said socially it is more complicated. If most middle easterners wear western dress they are white, even if the other person knows they are middle eastern. So people like, former presidential candidate, Ralph Nader are considered white. However if a middle eastern person wears traditionally islamic dress they are generally considered to belong to a different non-white middle eastern racial group. So the dress of Palestinians determines their race in the USA. Do Palestinians like Lebanese? Among Palestinians living in the West Bank there isn’t really a concrete opinion about Lebanese people. Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza with PA passports cannot enter Lebanon, and Lebanese people cannot enter Palestine/Israel either, that’s why an average Palestinian who hasn’t left the country before probably never met a Lebanese person, so naturally, if any opinions exist they are going to be prejudiced. With that being said even prejudiced opinions were so much more prevalent among older generations than younger generations. Most of the youth, myself included, weren’t even born during the civil war so any hostility that might’ve existed then doesn’t concern us. The only thing all generations would agree on is the feelings of resentment towards the treatment of Palestinians in refugee camps in Lebanon, but very few people would blame the Lebanese as a collective for that as the majority realize the average Lebanese has no hand in it. But do we think the Lebanese government should take a different approach in dealing with the refugees? Of course, but this is a topic for another day. In the few countries I’ve been to I met many Lebanese, but there is one encounter worth mentioning; My friend and I were waiting for the train to arrive at a train station in New York City, we were speaking in our native Palestinian tongue, a Lebanese girl approached us and asked us if we were Lebanese, when we told her we were Palestinian she said “Oh, I couldn’t tell” and we exchanged numbers two minutes later and ended up making plans for a weekend outing without putting much thought into it because it only feels normal to make relations withourpeople. Maybe in the Middle East the Palestinian - Lebanese divide is more noticeable because both sides feel compelled to fall back on their own distinct identity to defend their sovereignty especially after everything both sides have been through, but that aside, the culture, the language, the traditions are very similar and we do not see any reason for us to feel negatively about Lebanese people. What does the average Palestinian look like? Palestine is (with Iraq and Syria) at a crossing place of the whole of Eurasia, and is an anciently cosmopolitan area, so the population is very mixed. When you walk down a Palestinian street you can see in people’s faces signs of many different origins (see picture), and these go back centuries and millennia. In no particular order, you can see Persian, Arabic, Turkic (from Ottoman times), Greek (from Alexandrian and Byantine times), various African types (from African slaves - Gaza was a major slave-market a millennium ago), Jewish (remnants of Jews who remained in Palestine after the diaspora in Roman times), European (from Crusaders and Vikings), Kurdish and Circassian (Caucasian) strains. Ancient races such as the Canaanites will have left traces in the gene stock. It goes right back, literally over 100,000 years. So it’s difficult to typify Palestinians - they aren’t genetically or culturally just one people. However, you could say that Palestinian Christians often look more Greek than Arabic or Persian. People in this part of the Middle East are more intensely variable than in many parts of the world, and going a very long way back. Bizarrely, a small portion of the Palestinians and Bedouin derive from Jewish stock that never left the region in the diaspora, having converted to Islam centuries ago, and Israelis treat them the same as they do other Palestinians (badly). It’s all very complex - people in different towns can have somewhat different looks, since the region is very variegated locally. The West Bank is very hilly, which sections it up into little localities. Added to this, in theNaqbaof 1948, when many Palestinians were cleansed from what is now Israel, many refugees headed for specific Palestinian towns - so there are many people from Haifa area in Jenin, from Tel Aviv area in Bethlehem and from what is now southern Israel in Hebron and Gaza. Are The Palestinians the true Israelites? The primary historical source of the people called the Children of Israel, otherwise known as Israelites, is the Bible. Anyone who accepts the veracity of the Bible must also accept that the people to whom the Bible refers are those people whose heritage is based upon the Bible, the “People of the Book”, namely the Jewish People. The Arabs who lived in the parts of Ottoman Asia that were formerly Judea, renamed by Roman Emperor HadrianPalestinain the year 135, approximately 500 years before the emergence of the Arab people from the Arabian Peninsula, never claimed to be Israelites or Judeans, they claimed to be Arabs, as did the vast majority of those living in Ottoman Asia. Yousef Diya al-Khalidi, Ottoman mayor of Jerusalem in the 1870’s, wrote in a letter addressed to Rabbi Zadoc Kahn on March 1, 1899:“Zionism in principle is natural, beautiful, and just… Who could contest the rights of the Jews in Palestine? My God, historically it is your country!”. It would be convenient for those wishing to turn the clocks back a century and undo Zionism, if it had occurred to the Arabs in Palestine at the time, to make the ridiculous claim that, contrary to common knowledge, the population of Palestine are in fact the rightful heirs of the Judean people. But no such fiction was perpetrated, instead the Jews were told by the Arabs who had colonized the Jews’ lost homeland, thattheyhad Palestine now and that they would do whatever it takes to prevent the Jewish people from reclaiming what was firmly in Arab possession. Palestine has been firmly in the possession of the true Israelites, the People of the Book, for 73 years now. The clock will not be turned back. This reality is beginning to sink in for many of the proponents of the Palestinians, who have begun to realize that, now that half of the Jews in the world live in Israel, it would be more beneficial to form a partnership with the Jewish people than to continue to fantasize about turning back clocks. Unfortunately there remain many like the OP who prefer fantasy to reality. Who are Palestinians, and who are Arabs? The question of “who is an Arab” is understandably confusing. Until about the 6th century CE Arabs were the people who lived in the Arabian Peninsula. When Mohammed founded Islam and came to power the Islamic empire emerged, and in short order the empire spread throughout the Middle East and into parts of Africa and Europe. The lands that were integrated into the Islamic caliphate were “Arabized” - the Islamic culture displaced the local cultures. Aside from ethnic Arabians who colonized these lands, the local populations adopted the Islamic culture, language, and religion. Most likely there were many Arabized natives who had intermarried with ethnic Arabians. So Arabs are the combination of people who are ethnically Arabian with those who live in countries that were “Arabized”. Over the centuries the distinction has blurred to the point that people who live in Arab lands are identified as Arab regardless of whether they have any true Arabian ancestry. There are, however, countries where Islam became the official religion, and Arab culture was adopted to a greater or lesser degree, but the ethnic identity of the population was preserved. So, for instance, Persians (Iranians), Turks, and even Egyptians are not considered “ethnically” Arab. The Turkish (Ottoman) empire defeated the Islamic Caliphate, and ruled over the Middle East and large parts of Europe and Africa, starting around the 14th century. The Ottomans were Moslem and their culture was nearly identical to Arabic culture, so very little changed for the Arabs of the Middle East. Their Arab identity was retained. Now, as for Palestine, in the year 70 CE Roman forces defeated the Kingdom of Judea and changed Judea into a Roman province. In the year 135 CE the Jews attempted a revolt to reclaim Judea and, once crushed, emperor Hadrian renamed what was Judea as Palestine, using the name of an extinct people who colonized a strip of land roughly where the Gaza Strip is today. The idea was not original. There was a Greek historian who referred to Judea as Palestina centuries earlier. When the Roman empire adopted Christianity, the Jewish city of Jerusalem, where the Holy Temple stood in Jesus’ day, was central to their religion. After the Islamic conquest of Palestine, the region within which Jerusalem was located, recapturing Jerusalem became the focus of the competition between the Christian and Arab worlds. For scattered periods of history Jerusalem and parts of the region of Palestine were held by Crusader forces. The rest of the time the region of Palestine was nothing more than a small part of the greater Islamic or Ottoman empires. Thus the name Palestine for the region that was once Judea was preserved over the centuries despite the fact that the region was an indistinct region within vast empires and not an independent entity. During World War I allied forces liberated all of the Middle East from Turkish imperial rule and, under the authority of the League of Nations, the Middle East was arbitrarily divided into a collection of “Mandates”, one of which was Mandatory Palestine. Understandably the Arab people did not recognize the division of their world into arbitrary States and Arabs in Mandatory Palestine refused to accept the identity as “Palestinian”. The Jews in Palestine had no affinity to Arabs outside “Palestine” and gladly accepted the identity of Palestinian. The individuals commonly referred to as Palestinians these days are Arabs who resided in Mandatory Palestine following World War I, and did not receive Israeli citizenship. The term is also used to identify the offspring of Arabs who resided in Mandatory Palestine following World War I, their spouses, and probably their spouses’ extended families. Only Arabs are referred to as Palestinian. Pope's Audience Hall Is A Snake Head Revelation 20:2 Satan Is Bound Thousand Years https://rumble.com/v3pizvl-popes-audience-hall-is-a-snake-head-revelation-202-satan-is-bound-thousand-.html Every Single Catholic Worships Satan That old serpent, and dragon, and don't even realize it. The large hall is purported by conspiracy theorists to have been built to look like the head of a snake. A central feature of the hall is the sculpture The Resurrection, an extremely large bronze depicting Jesus Christ facing the consequences of a nuclear blast. The room was constructed in 1971 and named after Pope Paul VI. Some say the Pope's Audience Hall was deliberately designed to look like the head of a snake. Women Sex Slaves Of The Catholic Church And 800 Dead Baby In Church Septic Tank https://rumble.com/v3pe3zr-women-sex-slaves-of-the-catholic-church-and-800-dead-baby-in-church-septic-.html Women 9,600 Nuns Our Sex Slaves Of The Catholic Church With 1000s Of Baby Born And Over 42,000 Abortion Of Baby Father By Pope, Priests And Bishops Have Sex With Nuns And Boys And Sex With Other Priest Now And In The Past Time. To Date In 2019, Pope Francis publicly acknowledged that Catholic priests and bishops had been sexually abusing tens of thousands nuns, boys, some girl and other church members to and that a religious order of women had been dissolved because of "sexual slavery on the part of priests and the founder". 1,000s Top Islamic State Clerics Secret Pedophile Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages Death https://rumble.com/v3palma-1000s-top-islamic-state-clerics-secret-pedophile-sex-trade-pleasure-marriag.html Top Islamic State Clerics Of Islam Religious Authority and Political Power In Secret Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages To Children Young As 8 Years Old. This Powerful Investigation into Shia Clerics in some of Iraq's holiest shrines uncovers a network of exploitation of young women and girls, trapped into prostitution and pimped out by a religious elite. For the first time the clerics' secret sex trade has been captured on camera. Undercover filming and victim testimony reveal how they procure young women for male clients, and are prepared to conduct ‘pleasure marriages’ with children. Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages https://rumble.com/v3pc2vu-both-side-issues-exposed-islamic-state-clerics-secret-sex-trade-pleasure-ma.html Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade This documentary exposes "dodgy" practices of the BBC when filming the controversial earlier 2019 programmed 'Undercover With The Clerics: Iraq's Secret Sex Trade'. Widely condemned by the Shia Muslim world, accusations against this award winning doc include lies, poor translations and Islamophobia. BBC Deceit sets the record straight! Does Islam Allow The Exploitation, Beheading, And Rape Of Female Prisoners of War https://rumble.com/v3p319b-does-islam-allow-the-exploitation-beheading-and-rape-of-female-prisoners-of.html The Exploitation, Beheading, And Rape Of Female Prisoners of War Is so-called 'sexual slavery' permitted in Islam? No, says Anne-Marie, who explains the Quran's REAL teachings on female prisoners of war. She shows how sexual assault and ill-treatment of prisoners was not allowed, and how such prisoners were either released or could earn their freedom. No other religion has such humane and beneficial teachings on this difficult subject, and the World could have benefitted from them after World War 2. Does Islam Allow The Exploitation, Rape Children, Female Prisoners of War Part Two https://rumble.com/v3p5knb-does-islam-allow-the-exploitation-rape-children-female-prisoners-of-war-par.html The Exploitation, Beheading, And Rape Of Female Prisoners of War Is so-called 'sexual slavery' permitted in Islam? Part Two Now. It's almost a decade since ISIS militants swept through Iraq and Syria but the legacy of their brutal caliphate remains. While many Iraqis are reclaiming their lives in a period of relative calm, the targets of ISIS’ genocide, the Yazidis, are not at peace. The world was transfixed when this religious minority fled to the mountains of Sinjar. Rescue efforts managed to airlift some to safety and others who escaped on foot and were eventually settled in countries like Australia. But many were trapped and killed, and huge numbers tens of thousand of women and girls and baby were taken as sex slaves and some 8,000+ raped daily and baby killed too. A 10 Year Old Child Almost Dead Is A Survivor Of Islamic Terror Warns America Now https://rumble.com/v3ovsjw-a-10-year-old-child-almost-dead-is-a-survivor-of-islamic-terror-warns-ameri.html American Muslims Face Growing Prejudice Ten years after the 9/11 attacks, America's Muslims have become the country's internal enemy. Conservative forces have seized upon the so-called "Ground Zero Mosque" as a rallying point. Amid all the hate, Americans have lost sight of the real problem: the fact that their country has become paranoid. Jihadists And Islamic State Say Death To Everyone Islam And The Undeniable Truth https://rumble.com/v3oubcg-jihadists-and-islamic-state-say-death-to-everyone-islam-and-the-undeniable-.html Islam Is a Religion of Violence Can the wave of violence sweeping the Islamic world be traced back to the religion's core teachings and Undeniable Truth 1400 years of Islam history in a few minutes from Brigitte Gabriel was born in the Marjeyoun District of Lebanon to a Maronite Christian couple, a first and only child after over twenty years of marriage. She recalls that during the Lebanese Civil War, Islamic militants launched an assault on a Lebanese military base near her family's house and destroyed her home. Gabriel, who was ten years old at the time, was injured by shrapnel in the attack. She says that she and her parents were forced to live underground in all that remained, an 8-by-10-foot (2.4 by 3.0 m) bomb shelter for seven years, with only a small kerosene heater, no sanitary systems, no electricity or running water, and little food. She says she had to crawl in a roadside ditch to a spring for water to evade Muslim snipers. Israel Surprise Attack On Egypt Only And Later Israel Attack Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Sinai https://rumble.com/v3oq5lv-israel-surprise-attack-on-egypt-only-and-later-israel-attack-jordan-syria-i.html Israel Surprise Attack On Egypt Only June 1967 war was a critical development in the Arab-Israeli conflict, with consequences that are felt across the region to this day. It redrew the landscape of the conflict, expanded Israel’s territorial claims and confirmed its military dominance in the region. Israel Surprise Attack On United States Navy Ship USS Liberty 43 Dead 171 Wounded https://rumble.com/v3op5v1-israel-surprise-attack-on-united-states-navy-ship-uss-liberty-43-dead-171-w.html Israel Surprise Attack On United States Navy Ship USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship (spy ship), USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats, on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two marines, and one civilian NSA employee), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship. At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nmi (29.3 mi; 47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish. Surprise Attack On Israel By Jihad Hamas Khilafah Islamic State Not A Religion Peace https://rumble.com/v3o8bjh-surprise-attack-on-israel-by-jihad-hamas-khilafah-islamic-state-not-a-relig.html The Israeli Prime Minister, has vowed to take “mighty vengeance” after formally declaring war against Hamas Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Islamic State, Not A Religion Peace was founded with the aim of establishing the new Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank, Gaza and other areas of what is now Israel. While it does not have as long-range rockets as Hamas – the group that governs Gaza, PIJ does have a significant arsenal of small arms, mortars, rockets and anti-tank missiles, and an active armed wing called the al-Quds Brigades. Israel Declares War After Surprise Hamas Attack Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon https://rumble.com/v3o5uez-israel-declares-war-after-surprise-hamas-attack-freedom-fighters-millions-2.html This Land Is Mine Land And God Gave This Land To Me. Who Is Me ? Tens Of Millions Dead All Ready 5,000 Years Old War Already In Palestine is a small region of land that has played a prominent role in the ancient and modern history of the Middle East. The history of Palestine has been marked by frequent political conflict and violent land seizures because of its importance to several major world religions, and because Palestine sits at a valuable geographic crossroads between Africa and Asia. Hamas launched a surprise attack within Israel’s borders overnight, launching rockets from the Gaza Strip then sending militants into the southern part of the streets of Israel. Raf Sanchez reports from Ashkelon on the fatalities known so far and why this situation is unprecedented. Israel says its aerial bombardment of the Gaza Strip is one of the largest it has conducted on the besieged territory. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html Let's Stop All Wars Now in chronologically ordered by the year that hostilities were initiated The Final Speech from The Great Dictator was Chaplin’s first film with dialogue. Chaplin plays both a little Jewish barber, living in the ghetto, and Hynkel, the dictator ruler of Tomainia. In his autobiography Chaplin quotes himself as having said: “One doesn’t have to be a Jew to be anti Nazi. All one has to be is a normal decent human being.” Thanks You. The New World Order Year Zero !

A Muslim Man Declares Islam Will Take Over U.S.A. And Taunts White People With Ominous Threat... Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... So All White America Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period Today July 04, 2026 Will Go Down In Jihad History Death To USA. Some 92% Of All Muslims Alive Today USA Believe That Jihad Is Primarily A Call To Holy War Against All Skin Color Of Any Nonbelievers, Sinners, Heretics, And Apostates. The Plan To Force All America Under Sharia Law Here’s What They’re Hiding A Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance ? Yes This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because America You Are Considered " A Enemy Of Allah" Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here. My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you. But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming. And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today. All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only. According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave". Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now! They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently. Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence: Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.” Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing. These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression. This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.” Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day. The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam. Quranic verses include: Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…” Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…” Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…” Examples of Hadith include: Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.” Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’” Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it. Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’” Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’” These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion. Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience. Abolish Blasphemy Laws NOW: A Call to Action We, at Ex-Muslims International, demand: 1. The immediate repeal of blasphemy laws worldwide. 2. The unconditional release of all those accused of blasphemy. 3. Sanctions against governments that enforce blasphemy and apostasy laws. 4. Asylum for those fleeing persecution on blasphemy and apostasy grounds. 5. A global commitment to Laicite, free expression and conscience, without exceptions for religions. The group's public executions of gay men are part of a deliberate moral policing campaign, one aimed at showing supporters and enemies alike that it means to enforce its narrow, atavistic view of Islamic law wherever it can. Truth About Islam Laws In USA Tobacco, Coffee, And Alcohol Death Penalty For Violations. Adultery - Death penalty, stoning, lashing, banishment, or amputation of hand Alcohol - Death penalty Apostasy from Islam - Death penalty Coffee - Death penalty Murder - Death penalty, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Highway robbery - Execution, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Homosexuality - Death penalty Masturbation - Amputation of hand used Publishing pornography - Death penalty Rape- Death penalty Theft - Amputation of the right hand Theft 2nd time is - Death penalty Smoking tobacco - Death penalty Witchcraft - Death penalty Robbing a caravans - Death penalty... Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 A-Bomb How Powerful Are UK Nuclear Weapons - https://rumble.com/v71r52y-so-london-has-fallen-muslims-have-taken-over-8-a-bomb-how-powerful-are-uk-n.html So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 Atomic Bomb How Powerful Are The New Isis Muslims Are Now Running UK Nuclear Weapons Program? So London Has Fallen To Ten Million Muslims And The Islamic State Have Now Taken Over One Of UK Nuclear Powered Submarine With 8 A-Bomb On Board It And How Powerful Are UK Lost Of 8 Nuclear Weapons Now In Hands Of Millions Muslims Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws In 2026. Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v70xlx2-truth-about-muslim-death-cult-of-americastan-and-right-to-kill-you-under-is.html Truth Yes I'm Not Here To Offend Anyone Here, But Is It True That Muslims Are Told To Kill Other Religions? Its Not At All About "Islamophobia" As A Phrase Is Such A Complete Statement Today. Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. Islam, as a religion, does it promote a death cults and does it do or grant individuals a general right to kill under Islamic or Sharia law. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Yes It’s Happening Right Now New York City Starting January 02, 2026 As Your New Mayer Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways. Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology. Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history. The Quran: Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief. Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things." Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot. Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help." Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah'). Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers. Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…" Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks." Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle). According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause. Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense? Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement" Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle. Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end." Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals." Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..." Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy." Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..." Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert. Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims. Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war. Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths. Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!" Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell. Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians). Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith. Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper." Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer? Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness." Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam). Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).) Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?" Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse. Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations. Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you," Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell. Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26.. Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought. Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad. Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org From the Hadith: Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings. Bukhari (52:65) - The Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause. Muhammad's words are the basis for offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force. This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today. Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror' Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist) Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally." Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah." Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'." Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes." Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..." Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!" Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'" Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)." Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war... When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them." Bukhari 1:35 "The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed)." Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power." Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim. Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us" The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam. Tabari 17:187 "'By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former religion." The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali. Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’” Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve. Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah." Muhammad's instructions to his men prior to a military raid. Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship." One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief. Additional Notes: Other than the fact that Muslims haven't killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism. The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses of Islam's most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood. Those that do are earlier "Meccan" verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones. The example of Muhammad is that Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims do not have the power and numbers on their side. Once they do, then things change. Many Muslims are peaceful and do not want to believe what the Quran plainly says. They reach subjectively for textual context across different suras to try and mitigate the harsher passages. Even though the Quran itself claims to be clear and complete, Muslim apologists speak of the "risks" of trying to interpret the verses without their "assistance." Like many religious people, they want the text to fit their pre-established moral framework. Far from being mere history or theological construct, the violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni's bloody conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam's Genghis Khan) slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today's Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran. So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself. Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and even butchered captives. He actually inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members were slaughtered. It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion's most dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death. The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves. Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to attack in self-defense, this is an oxymoron that is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad. Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day marriage"). One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way." Elsewhere, he notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life." The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Qur'an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect." Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that "the Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time," tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule - bound only by the capacity for success. (source) Muhammad's failure to leave a clear line of succession resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew him best first fought to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda or 'Apostasy wars'). Then, within the closer community, early Meccan converts battled later ones. Hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad's own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter - a jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others' throats to this day. The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression, warfare...) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism. This is what makes the Quran's verses of violence so dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book, and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them - outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam's holiest book either speaks to Allah's hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it's little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community - even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in this way. Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam's most respected philosophers, understood that "the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force", many other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran's near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. In the West, it is typical for believers to think that their religion must be like Christianity - preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance - because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to find that this is contradicted by the Quran and the bloody history of Islam's genesis. Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the "culture", claiming that the father was merely following "the religion" and saying that the couple had to "discipline their daughter or lose respect." (source). In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious "holy pilgrimage" to Mecca by the Saudi king - without a single Muslim voice raised in protest. For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous. There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran literally... and too many others who couldn't care less about the violence done in the name of Islam. Jihad, Jizya, and Just War Theory The Qur’an and other Muslim sources contain both peaceful and violent passages. Muslims in the West (as well as politicians and the media) generally emphasize Muhammad’s peaceful teachings, while jihadists emphasize his more violent and radical commands. Although these “two faces” of Islam may seem opposed to one another, a careful examination shows that peace and violence are separate stages of a larger Islamic program, the ultimate goal of which is the violent subjugation of non-Muslims. According to the Qur’an and the example set by Muhammad, Muslims are to adapt their message and tactics to their status in society. When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a battle against non-Muslims, they are commanded to promote tolerance as a means of protecting the Muslim community. When their numbers grow sufficient for military action, Muslims are told to defend themselves, through terrorism if necessary, from both persecution and criticism. If Muslims come to dominate a society, they are ordered to subjugate the non-Muslim population actively. Because the requirements and goals of jihad are at odds with the most basic constraints of just war theory, Islam cannot be reformed without abandoning adherence to Muhammad’s commands. “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.” —Qur’an 48:29, Hilali-Khan “But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven.” —Matthew 5:44–451 Over the past fourteen centuries, more than 270 million people have been killed in the name of Islam. More recently, the world has seen deadly riots over a novel (Salman Rushdie’sThe Satanic Verses), cartoons (published by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten), and a poorly made YouTube video (a trailer for a film portraying Muhammad), all of which were deemed blasphemous by Muslim leaders. Since the destruction of the World Trade Center, jihadists have carried out approximately twenty thousand terrorist attacks globally. Yet many Muslims, especially in the West, have condemned religious-based violence. Pointing to Qur’an verses such as 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”), they claim that Islam is inherently peaceful, and that terrorism for the sake of Allah is the result ofpervertingMuhammad’s message. Just as we would not condemn Christianity as a whole because of the actions of people who distort Jesus’ teachings, so also we should not condemn Islam as a whole because of the actions of a minority of “extremists.” Hence, people of our generation are witnessing two very different faces of Islam—one shouting “Allahu Akbar!” and the other calling for tolerance. Which group represents Islam? Interestingly, they both do, for Islam has different sets of rules for Muslims in different circumstances. Muslims in America who proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace are doing exactly what Islam commands, 3 while Muslims in Pakistan who oppress non-Muslim minorities are also doing exactly what Islam commands. Jihad proceeds in stages. In this article, we will develop a deeper understanding of the Islamic concept of jihad by working our way past two common blunders—namely, (1) that Islam doesn’t call for violence against non-Muslims, and (2) that even if Islam does promote violence towards unbelievers, any long-term threat will be minimal, because Islam, like other religions, can be reformed. Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? - https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

America's Welfare Epidemic In States Why Muslim Women Can Live On Welfare For Life... See Quran Text And The U.S. Supreme Court Ruled 9-0 Women Getting Welfare Is Part Of Muslim Freedom Of Religion* Islamic State Of Americastan And A Right To Receive Welfare Food And Money For Life Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. Wake Up Women: A Man Rights Over A Women Rights In Islamic America... You Are Not To Disobey Him Ever And The Rights Under A Muslim Husband Rights Over His Wife In America Under Islamic And Sharia Laws And Honor Killing Today! In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here. My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you. But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming. And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today. All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Muslim women's can not work and all women are on Welfare and food stamps. What things are not allowed for women in Islam? Is not allowed by Islamic Law for A Woman to marry a non-Muslim man ever. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Then, a woman must obey him at all time. Muslim women's can not drive a car ever and can not open a bank acct. ever. Physical interaction between a man and a woman is not permitted in Islam. Islam does not allow women any kind of eye contact ever with anyone. Wearing strict and cleavage clothing with eyes and hand open only. #01. Can the Wife Go out without Husband’s Permission in Islam? I want to ask to what degree the husband’s duties towards his wife’s family extend. My question is because I am suffering a serious problem with my husband, because he treated my mother very badly when she came to visit us (because of an argument that took place between my mother-in-law and my mother); in the end my husband virtually threw my mother out. As a result of that, I had to leave the house with my mother, against my husband’s wishes as he wanted me to stay with him. Please note that I used to live in another country and I travelled with my mother to our country. My husband treats me very well, but I got angry when he treated her in this manner. He regretted it the next day, but she will not forgive him. Is what I did correct, or did I fail to obey my husband as enjoined by Allah, may He be exalted and glorified? It is prohibited for a woman to go out of the house without the husband’s permission except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations. With regard to a woman travelling without a Mahram, this is also prohibited. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Upholding family ties and treating in-laws kindly The husband should uphold ties with his wife’s family and treat them well. This is part of treating his wife kindly, because doing that makes her happy and earns him respect in her eyes, and increases the love and affection between them. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “…and live with them honourably.” [An-Nisa’ 4:19] Ibn Kathir said: “I.e., speak kindly to them, treat them well and pay attention to your deeds and your appearance as much as you can; as you would like her to do for you, do the same for her. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable.” [Al-Baqarah 2:228] The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The best of you is the one who is best towards his family; and I am the best of you towards my family.” (Classed as authentic by Al-Albani in As-Silsilah As-Sahihah, 285." (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 1/477 ) The role of apology and forgiveness in marriage With regard to your husband throwing your mother out of his house, he has apologised for that, and if a person apologises, the apology should be accepted and his mistake should be overlooked. The married woman should remember that obedience to her husband takes precedence over obedience to her parents. A man should not give precedence to anyone over his mother with regard to kind treatment, and a woman should not give precedence to anyone over her husband with regard to obedience. That is because of the greatness of the rights that he has over her. Part of the greatness of men’s rights over women is that Shari`ah almost commanded women to prostrate to men, were it not for the fact that it is not permissible for anyone to prostrate to any human being. The husband has no right to prevent his wife’s family from visiting their daughter , unless he fears that they may cause some mischief to her or encourage her to be willfully defiant towards him (Nashiz). In that case, he may prevent visits. #02. Wife going out without the husband’s permission in Islam? You made two mistakes and went against Shari`ah by doing them. The first mistake was going out of the house without your husband’s permission , and the second was travelling without a Mahram. Going out of the house without the husband’s permission is a prohibited action; Allah has even forbidden women who are revocably divorced (first or second divorce) from going out of their houses, so how about women who are not in that position? Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “O Prophet! When you divorce women, divorce them at their `Iddah (prescribed periods) and count (accurately) their `Iddah (periods). And fear Allah your Lord (O Muslims). And turn them not out of their (husband’s) homes nor shall they (themselves) leave, except in case they are guilty of some open illegal sexual intercourse. And those are the set limits of Allah. And whosoever transgresses the set limits of Allah, then indeed he has wronged himself.” [At-Talaq 65:1] Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: “Zayd ibn Thabit said: The husband is the master according to the Book of Allah, and he recited the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “They both found her lord [sayyid] (i.e. her husband) at the door.” [Yusuf 12:25] `Umar ibn Al-Khattab said: “Marriage is slavery, so be careful with regard to whom you give your daughter for enslavement.” In At-Tirmidhi and elsewhere it is narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “I urge you to treat women well, for they are prisoners with you.” So a woman is like a slave or prisoner of her husband, and she cannot go out of his house except with his permission, whether her father, her mother or anyone else tells her to do that, according to the consensus of the imams." (Al-Fatawa Al-Kubra, 3/148) Ibn Muflih Al-Hanbali said: “It is prohibited for a woman to go out of her husband’s house without his permission, except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations." (Al-Adab Ash-Shar`iyyah, 3/375) With regard to a woman travelling without a mahram , this is prohibited. This is stated in authentic Hadiths from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). An-Nawawi said: “Everything that is called travelling, it is forbidden for a woman to do without her husband or a mahram, whether it is three days, two days or one day, or Barid (a distance equivalent to approximately twenty kilometres) or anything else, because of the Hadith of Ibn `Abbas, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “No woman should travel without a Mahram.” This includes everything that is called travel. And Allah knows best.” (Sharh Muslim, 9/103) And Allah knows best. https://www.fajralquran.com/blog/islamic-laws-for-women/ #03. Is the First Look at Women Allowed? I know it is absolutely forbidden to gaze at women. If one accidentally catches my eyes sometimes I keep looking for a second or two and then I remember Allah's command and immediately look down. My question is: for that very little time that I do look at the lady, do I earn sins? Deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Jarir ibn Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "I asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) about an accidental glance at a woman . He commanded me to turn my gaze away." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, who said: This is an authentic Hadith. See As-Sunan, 2700). Commenting on this Hadith, Al-Mubarakpuri (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "Accidental means that his gaze fell on a non-Mahram woman unintentionally . He commanded me to turn my gaze away means that he was not to look a second time, because the first glance was not by choice and would be forgiven, but any further glances would be counted as sin, and he should heed the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): Tell the believing men to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) [An-Nur 24:30]" The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) said: "O `Ali, do not follow a glance with another, for you will be forgiven for the first, but not for the second." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 2701; see Sahih Al-Jami`, 7953) In At-Tuhfah, it says: "The words ‘do not follow a glance with another’ mean do not look again after the first glance. You will be forgiven for the first means that you will be forgiven if the first glance was unintentional, and but not for the second means that because the second glance was by choice, it will be counted against you." So it is clear that deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not. We ask Allah to protect you and us from all forbidden deeds. Allah is the One Who guides to the Straight Path. For more details, please see the following answers: 113996 , 49024 , 21784 , and 37654 . And Allah knows best. #04. Shaking Hands with Non-Mahram Women? I would like a detailed answer on the ruling on a man shaking hands with a woman, and the views of the four imams and the majority of scholars on that. It is not permissible for a man to touch the hands of a woman who is not one of his Mahrams. It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Shaking hands with non-Mahram women It is not permissible for a man who believes in Allah and His Messenger to put his hand in the hand of a woman who is not permissible for him or who is not one of his Mahrams. Whoever does that has wronged himself (i.e., sinned). It was narrated that Ma`qil ibn Yassar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir, 486. Shaykh Al-Albani classed it as authentic in Sahih Al-Jami`, 5045.) This Hadith alone is sufficient to deter and to instil the obedience required of us by Allah, because it implies that touching women may lead to temptation and immorality. It was narrated that `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) the wife of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When the believing women migrated to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), they would be tested in accordance with the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): {O Prophet! When believing women come to you to give you the Bay`ah (pledge), that they will not associate anything in worship with Allah, that they will not steal, that they will not commit illegal sexual intercourse} [Al-Mumtahanah 60:12] `A’ishah said: Whoever among the believing women agreed to that had passed the test, and when the women agreed to that, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to them: “Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.` No, by Allah, the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman, rather they would give their oath of allegiance with words only.” And `A’ishah said: “By Allah, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) only took the oath of allegiance from the women in the manner prescribed by Allah, and the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman. When he had taken their oath of allegiance he would say, `I have accepted your oath of allegiance verbally.`” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866) It was narrated from `Urwah that `A’ishah told him about the women’s oath of allegiance: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched any woman with his hand. He would explain to the woman what the oath of allegiance implied, and when she accepted, he would say ‘Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.’” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866) This infallible one, the best of mankind, the leader of the sons of Adam on the Day of Resurrection, did not touch women. This is despite the fact that the oath of allegiance was originally given by hand. So how about men other than the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)? It was narrated that Umaymah the daughter of Raqiqah said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women.” (Narrated by An-Nasa`i, 4181 and Ibn Majah, 2874; classed as authentic by Al-Albani in Sahih Al-Jami`, 2513) #05. Can you shake hands with non-Mahram women with a barrier in between? It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between, such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The Hadith that was narrated allowing that is inauthentic. It was narrated from Ma`qal ibn Yassar that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to shake hands with women from beneath a garment.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Awsat, 2855) Al-Haythami (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “This was narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir and Al-Awsat. Its chain of narration includes `Atab ibn Harb, who is weak.” (Majma` Al-Zawa`id, 6/39) Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi said: “The words of `A’ishah, “He used to accept the women’s oath of allegiance by words only” mean that he did so without taking their hands or shaking hands with them. This indicates that the Bay`ah of men was accepted by taking their hands and shaking hands with them, as well as by words, and this is how it was. What `A’ishah mentioned was the custom. Some of the commentators of the Quran mentioned that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) called for a vessel of water and dipped his hand in it, then the women dipped their hands in it. And some of them said that he did not shake hands with them from behind a barrier and had a Qatari cloak over his hand. And it was said that `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) shook hands with them on his behalf. None of these reports are sound, especially the last one, "How could `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) have done something that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), who was Ma`sum (infallible), would not do?” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45) Shaykh Ibn Baz (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The most correct view is that this (i.e., shaking hands with women from behind a barrier) is not allowed at all, because of the general meaning of the Hadith, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women;” and so as to ward off the means that may lead to evil. (Adapted from Hashiyat Majmu`at Rasa`il fi`l-Hijab was-Sufur, p. 69) #06. Can men shake hands with old women? The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women; this is also prohibited because of the general meaning of the texts on this issue. The reports that say it is permissible are inauthentic. Al-Zayla`i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “As for the report that Abu Bakr used to shake hands with old women, it is also inauthentic.” (Nasab Ar-Rayah, 4/240) Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “I cannot find this Hadith.” (End quote from Ad-Dirayah fi Takhrij Ahadith Al-Hidayah, 2/225) Views of the four imams on shaking hands with non-Mahram women With regard to the views of the four imams, they are as follows: The Hanafi Madhhab: Ibn Nujaym (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible for a man to touch a woman’s face or hands even if there is no risk of desire because it is prohibited in principle and there is no necessity that would allow it.” (End quote from Al-Bahr Al-Ra’iq, 8/219) The Maliki Madhhab: Muhammad ibn Ahmad (`Ulaysh) (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible for a man to touch the face or hand of a non-Mahram woman, and it is not permissible for him to put his hand on hers without a barrier. `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never accepted a woman`s oath of allegiance by shaking hands with her; rather he (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” According to another report, “His hand never touched the hand of a woman, rather he would accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” (End quote from Minah Al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil, 1/223) The Shafa`i Madhhab: An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible to touch a woman in any way.” (End quote from Al-Majmu`, 4/515) Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “This indicates that the hand of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not touch the hand of any woman apart from his wives and concubines, whether in the case of accepting the oath of allegiance or in other cases. If he did not do that despite the fact that he was infallible and beyond suspicion, then it is even more essential that others heed this prohibition. It appears from the texts that he refrained from doing that because it was prohibited for him to do so. The jurists among our companions and others said that it is prohibited to touch a non-Mahram woman even if that is not touching parts of her body that are not `Awrah, such as her face. But they differed with regard to looking when there is no desire and no fear of Fitnah. The prohibition on touching is stronger than the prohibition on looking, and it is prohibited when there is no necessity that would allow it. If it is the case of necessity, e.g. medical treatment, removing a tooth or treating the eyes, etc., if there is no woman who can do that, then it is permissible for a non-Mahram to do that because it is the case of necessity.” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45, 46) The Hanbali Madhhab Ibn Muflih (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “Abu `Abdullah – i.e., Imam Ahmad – was asked about a man who shakes hands with a woman. He said, No, and was emphatic that it is prohibited. I said, "Should he shake hands with her from beneath his garment?" He said, “No.” Shaykh Taqiy Ad-Din also favoured the view that it is prohibited, and gave the reason that touching is more serious than looking.” (End quote from Al-Adab As-Shar`iyyah, 2/257) And Allah knows best. #07. What is the ruling on looking at the faces of hijabi women? I live in an area where there are a lot of hijabi women, and out of necessity I have to speak to one of them from time to time. Can I look at their faces when speaking to them, or is averting the gaze obligatory even if they are wearing hijab? Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Allah, may He be exalted, has commanded men to avert their gaze from that which is haraam and is not permissible for them to look at. One of the things that is forbidden to them is looking at women who are not their mahrams, just as the same command is also addressed to women, to avert their gaze from that which Allah, may He be exalted, has forbidden. One of the things that is forbidden to women is to look at men who are not their mahrams. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Tell the believing men to avert their gaze and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what they do. And tell the believing women to avert their gaze and guard their private parts…” [an-Noor 24:30-31]. It is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman when there is a need to do so, which includes looking at her when buying and selling, giving testimony, giving or receiving medical treatment, and proposing marriage. As for looking with desire, that is forbidden according to scholarly consensus. See the cases in which it is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman in the answer to question no. 2198. The questioner did not mention the reason why he needs to look at hijabi women in his city. If what he meant was any of the reasons that we have mentioned which make it permissible to look, then there is nothing wrong with that, so long as he looks only as much as is necessary and does not go beyond that, because the basic principle is that he should avert his gaze, as mentioned in the verses quoted above. If he wants to look at them because he is simply talking to them without there being any of the cases of necessity that we have mentioned above, or similar reasons, then he is clearly enjoined to also avert his gaze from the one who is speaking to him, especially if she is young and there is no guarantee that there will be no temptation; in fact temptation and its causes are widespread. See the answer to question no. 114196 for further explanation. Among other things, we said there: With regard to a hijabi woman who uncovers her face only – despite the fact that she is going against the more correct shar‘i ruling which dictates that it is obligatory for a woman to cover her face – when there is a need for a man to deal with her for the purpose of buying, selling, helping, teaching, medical treatment, testimony, proposing marriage and so on, it is permissible to look at her face as much as is necessary, on condition that that is not accompanied by desire and there is no fear that he will be tempted.… End quote. And Allah knows best. #08. Ruling on women looking at men.? Is it permissible for a woman to look at men who are not her mahrams, or is that haram?. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on a woman looking at a man on TV or looking in an ordinary fashion in the street? He replied: When women look at men, whether that is on TV or otherwise, one of the following two scenarios must apply: 1 – Looking with desire and enjoyment, which is haram because of the evil and fitnah (temptation) involved 2 – Simply looking with no desire or enjoyment; there is nothing wrong with this according to the correct scholarly view, and this is permissible because it was proven that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) watched the Ethiopians when they were playing in the mosque, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was screening her from them, and he approved of her doing that. Women walk in the markets and look at men even when they are wearing hijab, so a woman may look at a man even when he does not look at her, on condition that there be no feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation). If there are any feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation) then it is haram to look, whether the man is on TV or otherwise. #09. Evidence Prohibiting of Mixing of Men and Women.? My husband and I wanted to know if it were permissable to take Arabic classes at a college where the classes are mixed (men-women). We understand that there is no mixing between the sexes, but confused about the definition of "mixing". Please tell us what is permissible, what is not and give proof. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: The meeting together, mixing, and intermingling of men and women in one place, the crowding of them together, and the revealing and exposure of women to men are prohibited by the Law of Islam (Shari'ah). These acts are prohibited because they are among the causes for fitnah (temptation or trial which implies evil consequences), the arousing of desires, and the committing of indecency and wrongdoing. Among the many proofs of prohibition of the meeting and mixing of men and women in the Quran and Sunnah are: Verse No. 53 of Surat al-Ahzab, or the Confederates (Interpretation of the meaning); "...for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs..." In explaining this Verse, Ibn Kathir (May Allah have mercy on him) said: "Meaning, as I forbade you to enter their rooms, I forbid you to look at them at all. If one wants to take something from them, one should do so without looking at them. If one wants to ask a woman for something, the same has to be done from behind a screen." The Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) enforced separation of men and women even at Allah’s most revered and preferred place, the mosque. This was accomplished via the separation of the women’s rows from the men’s; men were asked to stay in the mosque after completion of the obligatory prayer so that women will have enough time to leave the mosque; and, a special door was assigned to women. Evidence of the foregoing are: Umm Salamah (May Allah be pleased with her) said that after Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said "as-Salamu ‘Alaykum wa Rahmatullah’ twice announcing the end of prayer, women would stand up and leave. He would stay for a while before leaving. Ibn Shihab said that he thought that the staying of the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) was in order for the women to be able to leave before the men who wanted to depart." Narrated by al-Bukhari under No. 793. Abu Dawood under No. 876 narrates the same hadith in Kitab al-Salaat under the title "Insiraaf an-Nisaa’ Qabl al-Rijaal min al-Salaah" (Departure of Women before Men after the Prayer). Ibn ‘Umar said that Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: "We should leave this door (of the mosque) for women." Naafi’ said: "Ibn ‘Umar never again entered through that door until he died." Narrated by Abu Dawood under No. 484 in "Kitab as-Salah" under the Chapter entitled: "at-Tashdid fi Thalik". Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: ""The best of the men’s rows is the first and the worst is the last, and the best of the women’s rows is the last and the worst in the first." Narrated by Muslim under No. 664. This is the greatest evidence that the Law of Islam (Shari'ah) forbids meeting and mixing of men and women. The farther the men are from the women’s rows, the better, and vice versa. If these procedures and precautions were prescribed and adhered to in a mosque, which is a pure place of worship where people are as far away as they ever are from the arousal of desire and temptation, then no doubt the same procedures need to be followed even more rigorously at other places. Abu Usayd al-Ansari narrated that he heard Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) say to the women on his way out of the mosque when he saw men and women mixing together on their way home: ‘Give way (i.e., walk to the sides) as it is not appropriate for you to walk in the middle the road.’ Thereafter, women would walk so close to the wall that their dresses would get caught on it. Narrated by Abu Dawood in "Kitab al-Adab min Sunanihi, Chapter: Mashyu an-Nisa Ma’ ar-Rijal fi at-Tariq."We know that the intermingling, mixing and crowding together of men and women is part of today’s unavoidable yet regrettable affliction in most places, such as markets, hospitals, colleges, etc., but: · We will not willfully choose or accept mixing and crowding, particularly in religious classes and council meetings in Islamic Centers. · We take precautions to avoid meeting and mixing of men and women as much as possible while at the same time achieving desired goals and objectives. This result can be achieved by designating separate places assigned for men and women, using different doors for each, utilizing modern means of communication such as microphones, video recorders etc., and expediting efforts to have enough female teachers to teach women, etc. · We show fear of Allah as much as we can by not looking at members of the opposite sex and by applying self-restraint. There follow some of the results of a study on mixing undertaken by some Muslim social science researchers. #10. When we put the following question: What is the Islamic ruling on mixing as far as you know? The results were as follows: 76% of respondents said “It is not permitted.” 12% said, “It is permitted” – but moral, religious, etc. restrictions apply… 12% said, “I don’t know.” Which would you choose? If you had the choice between working in a mixed workplace and working in another where there was no mixing, which would you choose? The responses to this question were as follows: 76% would choose the workplace where there was no mixing. 9% preferred the mixed workplace. 15% would accept any workplace which suited their specialties, regardless of whether it was mixed or not. Very embarrassing Have any embarrassing situations ever happened to you because of mixing? Among the embarrassing moments mentioned by respondents in this study were the following: I was at work one day, and I went into one department where one of my female colleagues who wears hijaab had taken off her hijaab in front of her female colleagues. My entrance took her by surprise and I was very embarrassed as a result. I had to do an experiment in the lab at university, but I was absent on the day of the experiment. I had to go to the lab on the following day, and I found myself the only male among a group of female students, in addition to a female teacher and a female lab technician. I was very embarrassed and felt very awkward with all those female eyes glaring at me. I was trying to take a feminine towel out of one of the drawers when I was surprised by a male colleague standing behind me, who wanted to take something from his own private drawer. He noticed that I was embarrassed and he left the room quickly to avoid my embarrassment. It so happened that one of the girls at the university bumped into me when turning a corner in a crowded corridor. She was walking quickly, going to one of the lectures. As a result of this collision, she lost her balance, and I caught her in my arms, as if I was embracing her. You can imagine how embarrassed I and this girl felt in front of a group of careless young people. One of my female colleagues fell on the stairs in the university and her clothes fell open in an extremely embarrassing fashion. She landed upside down and could not help herself; the young men standing nearby had no option but to cover her and help her to get up. I work in a company and I went in to give some papers to my boss. When I was going out, my boss called me back. I turned around and saw him with his face turned away. I was waiting for him to ask me for a file or for more papers, and I was surprised by his hesitancy. I turned away to the left side of his office, pretending to be busy with something, and he spoke to me at the same time. I thought that this boss would say anything except what he actually said, which was to point out that my garment was stained with menstrual blood. Can the earth open up and swallow a human being at the moment of making sincere supplication? For I prayed that the earth would open up and swallow me. Victims of mixing… True stories Lost hope Umm Muhammad, a mature woman over the age of 40, tells her story. I lived a life of modest means with my husband. There was never any closeness and harmony, and my husband did not have the kind of strong personality that a woman would hope for, but his good nature made me overlook the fact that I was the one who was responsible for most of the decision making in the family. My husband often used to mention the name of his friend and business partner, and he would talk about him in my presence, and I often used to meet with him in his office which was originally part of our apartment. This went on for many years, until circumstances led to us exchanging visits with this person and his family. These family visits were repeated and because of his close friendship with my husband, we did not notice how the number of visits increased and how many hours a single visit would last. He often used to come on his own to sit with us, me and my husband, for long visits. My husband’s trust in him knew no bounds, and as days passed I got to know this person very well, and saw how wonderful and decent he was. I began to feel a strong attraction towards this man, and at the same time I began to sense that the feeling was mutual. Things took a strange turn after that, when I realized that this man was the kind of person I had always dreamed about. Why had he come along now, after all these years? The more this man’s status increased in my eyes, the more my husband’s status diminished. It was as if I had needed to see the beauty of his character in order to discover how ugly my husband’s character was. The matter between this person and myself did not go beyond these persistent thoughts which were occupying my mind night and day. Neither he nor I ever voiced what we felt in our hearts… until today. Yet despite that my life is over and my husband is little more than a weak man with no self-esteem. I hate him and I do not know how all this hatred towards him started to boil over. I wonder how I put up with him all these years, bearing all these burdens by myself, facing life’s problems on my own. Things got so bad that I asked him for a divorce, and he divorced me at my request. After that he became a broken man. Even worse than that is that after my marriage was wrecked and my children and husband were devastated, problems arose in this man's family. His wife, with her feminine intuition, realized what had been going on in his heart of hearts, and his life became hell. She was overwhelmed with jealousy to the extent that one night she left her house at 2 a.m. and came to attack my house, screaming, weeping and hurling accusations. His marriage was also about to collapse. I admit that the lovely gatherings which we used to enjoy gave us the opportunity to get to know one another at a time that was not appropriate at this stage in our lives. His marriage has been wrecked and so has mine. I have lost everything, and now I know that my circumstances and his will not permit us to take any positive step towards coming together. Now I am more miserable than I have ever been, and I am looking for illusionary happiness and lost hopes. Tit-for-tat Umm Ahmad tells us: My husband had a group of married friends, and because of our close friendship with them, we used to get together with them once a week in one of our houses, to enjoy an evening of chat. Deep down in my heart I was never really comfortable with the atmosphere in which we would have dinner, sweets, snacks and drinks of juice accompanied by waves of laughter because of the jokes and chit-chats that often went beyond the bounds of good manners. In the name of friendship, the barriers were lifted and every now and then one would hear suppressed laughter between a woman and the husband of another woman. The jokes were too much, dealing – with no sense of shyness –with sensitive topics such as sex and women’s private matters. This was usual and was even accepted and regarded as desirable. Although I indulged in these things along with them, my conscience made me feel guilty. Then the day came when it became quite clear just how ugly and filthy this atmosphere was. The telephone rang, and I heard the voice of one of the friends in this group. I said hello to him and apologized that my husband was not home. He replied that he knew that, and that he was calling to speak to me! After he suggested starting a relationship with me, I got very angry and spoke harshly to him and cursed him. All he could do was laugh and say, “Don’t try and show these good manners to me; go and check on your husband’s good manners and see what he is doing…” I was devastated by what he said, but I pulled myself together and said to myself, this person is only trying to cause the break up of your marriage. But he succeeded in planting the seeds of doubt concerning my husband. Shortly after that, the major disaster struck. I discovered that my husband was cheating on me with another woman. It was the matter of life or death as far as I was concerned. I found my husband out and I confronted him, saying: “You are not the only one who can have a relationship. I have received a similar proposition.” And I told him all about his friend. He was stunned and absolutely shocked. (I said:) “If you want me to respond in kind to your relationship with that woman, then this is for that, tit-for-tat.” This was a huge slap in the face for him. He knew that I did not intend to do that in reality, but he realized the great disaster that had befallen our lives and the immoral atmosphere in which we were living. I suffered a great deal until my husband finally left that loose woman with whom he was having a relationship, as he admitted to me. Yes, he left her and came back to his family and children, but how can I ever feel the same towards him as I used to? Who will restore respect for him in my heart? This huge wound in my heart is still bleeding out of regret and rage at that filthy atmosphere; it still bears testimony to the fact that what they call innocent get-togethers are in reality anything but innocent. My heart still begs for mercy from the Lord of Glory. Intelligence can also be a temptation (fitnah) ‘Abd al-Fattaah says: I work as the head of department in one of the big companies. For a long time I admired one of my female colleagues, not for her beauty, but for her serious attitude towards her work, her intelligence and her excellent achievements – in addition to the fact that she was a decent and modest person who focused only on her work. This admiration turned into attachment, and I am a married man who fears Allah and never misses any obligatory prayer. I expressed my feelings to her and she rebuffed me. She is married and has children as well. She sees no reason why I should have any kind of relationship with her, whether it be friendship, as work colleagues or based on admiration… etc. Evil thoughts come to me sometimes, and deep down I wish that her husband would divorce her so that I could get her. I started to put pressure on her at work and put her down in front of my bosses. Perhaps this was a form of revenge on my part, but she accepted it with good manners and did not complain or comment. She works and works; her performance speaks of her quality, and she knows this well. The more she resisted me, the stronger my infatuation grew. I am not a person who is easily tempted by women, because I fear Allah and I do not overstep the mark with them and go beyond what is required by my work. But this woman attracted me. What is the solution?… I do not know. Baby ducks know how to swim N.A.A., a nineteen-year-old girl, tells us: At that time I was a little girl. My innocent eyes watched those evening get-togethers when family friends would meet in the house. What I remember is that I could only see one man, who was my father. I watched him as he moved about the room, how his glances would devour the women present, looking at their thighs and chests, admiring this one’s eyes, that one’s hair, the other’s hips. My poor mother had no choice but to take care of these get-togethers. She was a very simple lady. Among the women present there was one woman who would deliberately try to attract my father’s attention, sometimes by coming close to him, and sometimes by making enticing movements. I would watch this with concern, whilst my mother was busy in the kitchen for the sake of her guests. These gatherings stopped suddenly and I tried, young as I was, to understand and make sense of what had happened, but I could not. What I remember was that my mother collapsed completely at that time, and she could not stand to hear my father’s name mentioned in the house. I used to hear mysterious words whispered by the adults around me: “Betrayal… bedroom… she saw them with her own eyes… despicable woman… in a very shameful position…” etc. These were the key words which only the adults could understand. I grew up and came to understand, and I bore a grudge against all men. All of them were treacherous. My mother was a broken woman and accused every woman who came to us of being a man-snatcher who wanted to make my father fall into her trap. My father hasn’t changed. He is still practising his favourite hobby of chasing women, but now he does it outside the home. Now I am nineteen years old and I know lots of young men. I feel great pleasure in taking revenge on them, because every one of them is an exact copy of my father. I tempt them and entice them, without letting them get anywhere near me. They follow me in gatherings and in the marketplaces because of my movements and deliberate gestures. Sometimes my phone never stops ringing and I feel proud of what I do to avenge the sex of Hawwa’ and my mother. But sometimes I feel so miserable and such a failure that it almost chokes me. My life is shadowed by a huge dark cloud, and its name is my father. Before it is too late S.N.A. tells of her experience: I never imagined that my work circumstances would force me to be in contact with the opposite sex (men), but this in fact is what happened… In the beginning, I used to cover and screen myself from men by wearing niqaab (face-veil), but some of the sisters advised me that this dress was attracting more attention to my presence, and it would be better for me to take off the niqaab, especially since my eyes were somewhat attractive. So I removed the cover from my face, thinking that this was better. But by continuing to mix with my colleagues, I discovered that I was the odd one out because of my antisocial attitude and my insistence on not joining in the conversation and chatting with others. Everyone was wary of this “lone-wolf” woman (as they saw me), and this is what was stated clearly by one person who affirmed that he would not want to deal with such a snooty and stand-offish character. But I knew that I was the opposite, in fact, and I decided that I would not oppress myself and put myself in a difficult position with my colleagues. So I started to join in their chats and exchanges of anecdotes, and they all discovered that I could speak eloquently and persuasively, and that I could influence others. I could also speak in a manner that was determined yet at the same time was attractive to some of my colleagues. It was not long before I noticed some changes in the expression of my direct supervisor; with some embarrassment, he was enjoying the way I spoke and moved, and he would deliberately bring up topics in the conversation where I would see that hateful look in his eyes. I do not deny the fact that I started to entertain some thoughts about this man. I found it astonishing that a man could fall so easily into the trap of a woman who was religiously committed, so how must it be in the case of women who adorn themselves and invite men to commit immoral actions? In fact, I did not think of him in any way which went beyond the bounds of sharee’ah, but he did occupy a space in my thoughts for quite some time. But soon my self-respect made me reject the idea of being a source of enjoyment for this man in any way, shape or form, even if it was only psychological in nature, and I stopped getting involved in any kind of work that would force me to sit alone with him. In the end, I reached the following conclusions: 1- Attraction between the sexes can occur in any circumstances, no matter how much men and women may deny that. The attraction may start within the bounds of sharee’ah and end up going beyond those bounds. 2- Even if a person protects himself (by marriage), he is not safe from the snares of the Shaytaan. 3- Even though a person may be able to guarantee himself and he works with the opposite sex within reasonable limits, he cannot guarantee the feelings of the other party. Finally, there is nothing good in mixing and it does not bear fruit as they claim. On the contrary, it corrupts sound thinking. What now? We may ask, what comes next, after this discussion on the matter of mixing? It’s about time for us to recognize that no matter how we try to beautify the issue of mixing and take the matter lightly, its consequences are bound to catch up with us, and the harm it causes will have disastrous results for our families. Sound common sense refuses to accept that mixing is a healthy atmosphere for human relations. This is the sound common sense which made most of the people included in this survey (76%) prefer working in a non-mixed environment. The same percentage (76%) said that mixing is not permitted according to the sharee’ah. What makes us sit up and take notice is not this honourable percentage – which indicates the purity of our Islamic society and the cleanness of its members’ hearts – but the small number who said that mixing is permitted; they number 12%. This group, with no exceptions, said that mixing is permitted but within the limits set by religion, custom (‘urf), traditions, good manners, conscience, modesty, covering and other worthy values which, in their opinion, keep mixing within proper limits. We ask them: is the mixing which we see nowadays in our universities, market-places, work-places and family and social gatherings, taking place within the limits referred to above? Or are these places filled with transgressions in terms of clothing, speech, interactions and behaviour? We see wanton displays of adornment (tabarruj), not proper covering; we see fitnah (temptations) and dubious relationships, with no good manners and no conscience and no covering. We can conclude that the kind of mixing that is happening nowadays is unacceptable even to those who approve of mixing in a clean atmosphere. It’s about time for us to recognize that mixing provides a fertile breeding-ground for social poisons to invade and take over our society without anyone ever realizing that it is mixing which is the cause. Mixing is the prime element in this silent fitnah, in the shade of which betrayals erupt, homes are wrecked and hearts are broken. We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound, and to reform our society. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad. #11. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only. According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. #12. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave". Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf #13. The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now! They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently. Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence: Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.” Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing. These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression. This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.” Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day. The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights. #14. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam. Quranic verses include: Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…” Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…” Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…” Examples of Hadith include: Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.” Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’” Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it. Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’” Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’” These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion. Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? -https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

A Wake Up Call To All America Muslim Women Who Are Still Alive Today (A Top Imam Leader In USA Said* "Ware Your Hijab Or Burqa Now Or Die In 2026 Period ?") Soaring In The Polls As Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party *Burqa Act Was Justified After Bill Was Denied For Debate Australian Senate Floor Chambers On November 24, 2025? Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, wore a burqa in the Australian Senate chamber on November 24, 2025, after her bill to ban burqas and other face coverings in public places was denied debate. She framed the act as a justified protest against what she described as undemocratic suppression of discussion, stating, “If Parliament will not ban it, then I will display this oppressive, radical, non-religious head-garment... on the floor of our Parliament so that every Australian knows what's at stake”. Hanson argued that the refusal to allow a debate while simultaneously prohibiting her from wearing the hijab or burqa in Parliament was hypocritical, especially in the absence of a formal dress code. Her actions sparked immediate backlash, with cross-party condemnation. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who leads the government in the Senate, accused Hanson of mocking and vilifying a faith observed by nearly one million Australians, calling the act divisive and damaging to social cohesion. Minister for Multiculturalism Anne Aly also condemned the stunt as unacceptable and an attempt to divide the nation. In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here. My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you. But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming. And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today. #01. Can the Wife Go out without Husband’s Permission in Islam? I want to ask to what degree the husband’s duties towards his wife’s family extend. My question is because I am suffering a serious problem with my husband, because he treated my mother very badly when she came to visit us (because of an argument that took place between my mother-in-law and my mother); in the end my husband virtually threw my mother out. As a result of that, I had to leave the house with my mother, against my husband’s wishes as he wanted me to stay with him. Please note that I used to live in another country and I travelled with my mother to our country. My husband treats me very well, but I got angry when he treated her in this manner. He regretted it the next day, but she will not forgive him. Is what I did correct, or did I fail to obey my husband as enjoined by Allah, may He be exalted and glorified? It is prohibited for a woman to go out of the house without the husband’s permission except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations. With regard to a woman travelling without a Mahram, this is also prohibited. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Upholding family ties and treating in-laws kindly The husband should uphold ties with his wife’s family and treat them well. This is part of treating his wife kindly, because doing that makes her happy and earns him respect in her eyes, and increases the love and affection between them. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “…and live with them honourably.” [An-Nisa’ 4:19] Ibn Kathir said: “I.e., speak kindly to them, treat them well and pay attention to your deeds and your appearance as much as you can; as you would like her to do for you, do the same for her. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable.” [Al-Baqarah 2:228] The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The best of you is the one who is best towards his family; and I am the best of you towards my family.” (Classed as authentic by Al-Albani in As-Silsilah As-Sahihah, 285." (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 1/477 ) The role of apology and forgiveness in marriage With regard to your husband throwing your mother out of his house, he has apologised for that, and if a person apologises, the apology should be accepted and his mistake should be overlooked. The married woman should remember that obedience to her husband takes precedence over obedience to her parents. A man should not give precedence to anyone over his mother with regard to kind treatment, and a woman should not give precedence to anyone over her husband with regard to obedience. That is because of the greatness of the rights that he has over her. Part of the greatness of men’s rights over women is that Shari`ah almost commanded women to prostrate to men, were it not for the fact that it is not permissible for anyone to prostrate to any human being. The husband has no right to prevent his wife’s family from visiting their daughter , unless he fears that they may cause some mischief to her or encourage her to be willfully defiant towards him (Nashiz). In that case, he may prevent visits. #02. Wife going out without the husband’s permission in Islam? You made two mistakes and went against Shari`ah by doing them. The first mistake was going out of the house without your husband’s permission , and the second was travelling without a Mahram. Going out of the house without the husband’s permission is a prohibited action; Allah has even forbidden women who are revocably divorced (first or second divorce) from going out of their houses, so how about women who are not in that position? Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “O Prophet! When you divorce women, divorce them at their `Iddah (prescribed periods) and count (accurately) their `Iddah (periods). And fear Allah your Lord (O Muslims). And turn them not out of their (husband’s) homes nor shall they (themselves) leave, except in case they are guilty of some open illegal sexual intercourse. And those are the set limits of Allah. And whosoever transgresses the set limits of Allah, then indeed he has wronged himself.” [At-Talaq 65:1] Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: “Zayd ibn Thabit said: The husband is the master according to the Book of Allah, and he recited the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “They both found her lord [sayyid] (i.e. her husband) at the door.” [Yusuf 12:25] `Umar ibn Al-Khattab said: “Marriage is slavery, so be careful with regard to whom you give your daughter for enslavement.” In At-Tirmidhi and elsewhere it is narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “I urge you to treat women well, for they are prisoners with you.” So a woman is like a slave or prisoner of her husband, and she cannot go out of his house except with his permission, whether her father, her mother or anyone else tells her to do that, according to the consensus of the imams." (Al-Fatawa Al-Kubra, 3/148) Ibn Muflih Al-Hanbali said: “It is prohibited for a woman to go out of her husband’s house without his permission, except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations." (Al-Adab Ash-Shar`iyyah, 3/375) With regard to a woman travelling without a mahram , this is prohibited. This is stated in authentic Hadiths from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). An-Nawawi said: “Everything that is called travelling, it is forbidden for a woman to do without her husband or a mahram, whether it is three days, two days or one day, or Barid (a distance equivalent to approximately twenty kilometres) or anything else, because of the Hadith of Ibn `Abbas, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “No woman should travel without a Mahram.” This includes everything that is called travel. And Allah knows best.” (Sharh Muslim, 9/103) And Allah knows best. https://www.fajralquran.com/blog/islamic-laws-for-women/ #03. Is the First Look at Women Allowed? I know it is absolutely forbidden to gaze at women. If one accidentally catches my eyes sometimes I keep looking for a second or two and then I remember Allah's command and immediately look down. My question is: for that very little time that I do look at the lady, do I earn sins? Deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Jarir ibn Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "I asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) about an accidental glance at a woman . He commanded me to turn my gaze away." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, who said: This is an authentic Hadith. See As-Sunan, 2700). Commenting on this Hadith, Al-Mubarakpuri (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "Accidental means that his gaze fell on a non-Mahram woman unintentionally . He commanded me to turn my gaze away means that he was not to look a second time, because the first glance was not by choice and would be forgiven, but any further glances would be counted as sin, and he should heed the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): Tell the believing men to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) [An-Nur 24:30]" The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) said: "O `Ali, do not follow a glance with another, for you will be forgiven for the first, but not for the second." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 2701; see Sahih Al-Jami`, 7953) In At-Tuhfah, it says: "The words ‘do not follow a glance with another’ mean do not look again after the first glance. You will be forgiven for the first means that you will be forgiven if the first glance was unintentional, and but not for the second means that because the second glance was by choice, it will be counted against you." So it is clear that deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not. We ask Allah to protect you and us from all forbidden deeds. Allah is the One Who guides to the Straight Path. For more details, please see the following answers: 113996 , 49024 , 21784 , and 37654 . And Allah knows best. #04. Shaking Hands with Non-Mahram Women? I would like a detailed answer on the ruling on a man shaking hands with a woman, and the views of the four imams and the majority of scholars on that. It is not permissible for a man to touch the hands of a woman who is not one of his Mahrams. It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Shaking hands with non-Mahram women It is not permissible for a man who believes in Allah and His Messenger to put his hand in the hand of a woman who is not permissible for him or who is not one of his Mahrams. Whoever does that has wronged himself (i.e., sinned). It was narrated that Ma`qil ibn Yassar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir, 486. Shaykh Al-Albani classed it as authentic in Sahih Al-Jami`, 5045.) This Hadith alone is sufficient to deter and to instil the obedience required of us by Allah, because it implies that touching women may lead to temptation and immorality. It was narrated that `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) the wife of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When the believing women migrated to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), they would be tested in accordance with the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): {O Prophet! When believing women come to you to give you the Bay`ah (pledge), that they will not associate anything in worship with Allah, that they will not steal, that they will not commit illegal sexual intercourse} [Al-Mumtahanah 60:12] `A’ishah said: Whoever among the believing women agreed to that had passed the test, and when the women agreed to that, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to them: “Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.` No, by Allah, the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman, rather they would give their oath of allegiance with words only.” And `A’ishah said: “By Allah, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) only took the oath of allegiance from the women in the manner prescribed by Allah, and the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman. When he had taken their oath of allegiance he would say, `I have accepted your oath of allegiance verbally.`” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866) It was narrated from `Urwah that `A’ishah told him about the women’s oath of allegiance: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched any woman with his hand. He would explain to the woman what the oath of allegiance implied, and when she accepted, he would say ‘Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.’” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866) This infallible one, the best of mankind, the leader of the sons of Adam on the Day of Resurrection, did not touch women. This is despite the fact that the oath of allegiance was originally given by hand. So how about men other than the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)? It was narrated that Umaymah the daughter of Raqiqah said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women.” (Narrated by An-Nasa`i, 4181 and Ibn Majah, 2874; classed as authentic by Al-Albani in Sahih Al-Jami`, 2513) #05. Can you shake hands with non-Mahram women with a barrier in between? It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between, such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The Hadith that was narrated allowing that is inauthentic. It was narrated from Ma`qal ibn Yassar that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to shake hands with women from beneath a garment.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Awsat, 2855) Al-Haythami (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “This was narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir and Al-Awsat. Its chain of narration includes `Atab ibn Harb, who is weak.” (Majma` Al-Zawa`id, 6/39) Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi said: “The words of `A’ishah, “He used to accept the women’s oath of allegiance by words only” mean that he did so without taking their hands or shaking hands with them. This indicates that the Bay`ah of men was accepted by taking their hands and shaking hands with them, as well as by words, and this is how it was. What `A’ishah mentioned was the custom. Some of the commentators of the Quran mentioned that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) called for a vessel of water and dipped his hand in it, then the women dipped their hands in it. And some of them said that he did not shake hands with them from behind a barrier and had a Qatari cloak over his hand. And it was said that `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) shook hands with them on his behalf. None of these reports are sound, especially the last one, "How could `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) have done something that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), who was Ma`sum (infallible), would not do?” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45) Shaykh Ibn Baz (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The most correct view is that this (i.e., shaking hands with women from behind a barrier) is not allowed at all, because of the general meaning of the Hadith, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women;” and so as to ward off the means that may lead to evil. (Adapted from Hashiyat Majmu`at Rasa`il fi`l-Hijab was-Sufur, p. 69) #06. Can men shake hands with old women? The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women; this is also prohibited because of the general meaning of the texts on this issue. The reports that say it is permissible are inauthentic. Al-Zayla`i (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “As for the report that Abu Bakr used to shake hands with old women, it is also inauthentic.” (Nasab Ar-Rayah, 4/240) Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “I cannot find this Hadith.” (End quote from Ad-Dirayah fi Takhrij Ahadith Al-Hidayah, 2/225) Views of the four imams on shaking hands with non-Mahram women With regard to the views of the four imams, they are as follows: The Hanafi Madhhab: Ibn Nujaym (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible for a man to touch a woman’s face or hands even if there is no risk of desire because it is prohibited in principle and there is no necessity that would allow it.” (End quote from Al-Bahr Al-Ra’iq, 8/219) The Maliki Madhhab: Muhammad ibn Ahmad (`Ulaysh) (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible for a man to touch the face or hand of a non-Mahram woman, and it is not permissible for him to put his hand on hers without a barrier. `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never accepted a woman`s oath of allegiance by shaking hands with her; rather he (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” According to another report, “His hand never touched the hand of a woman, rather he would accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” (End quote from Minah Al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil, 1/223) The Shafa`i Madhhab: An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “It is not permissible to touch a woman in any way.” (End quote from Al-Majmu`, 4/515) Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “This indicates that the hand of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not touch the hand of any woman apart from his wives and concubines, whether in the case of accepting the oath of allegiance or in other cases. If he did not do that despite the fact that he was infallible and beyond suspicion, then it is even more essential that others heed this prohibition. It appears from the texts that he refrained from doing that because it was prohibited for him to do so. The jurists among our companions and others said that it is prohibited to touch a non-Mahram woman even if that is not touching parts of her body that are not `Awrah, such as her face. But they differed with regard to looking when there is no desire and no fear of Fitnah. The prohibition on touching is stronger than the prohibition on looking, and it is prohibited when there is no necessity that would allow it. If it is the case of necessity, e.g. medical treatment, removing a tooth or treating the eyes, etc., if there is no woman who can do that, then it is permissible for a non-Mahram to do that because it is the case of necessity.” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45, 46) The Hanbali Madhhab Ibn Muflih (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “Abu `Abdullah – i.e., Imam Ahmad – was asked about a man who shakes hands with a woman. He said, No, and was emphatic that it is prohibited. I said, "Should he shake hands with her from beneath his garment?" He said, “No.” Shaykh Taqiy Ad-Din also favoured the view that it is prohibited, and gave the reason that touching is more serious than looking.” (End quote from Al-Adab As-Shar`iyyah, 2/257) And Allah knows best. #07. What is the ruling on looking at the faces of hijabi women? I live in an area where there are a lot of hijabi women, and out of necessity I have to speak to one of them from time to time. Can I look at their faces when speaking to them, or is averting the gaze obligatory even if they are wearing hijab? Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Allah, may He be exalted, has commanded men to avert their gaze from that which is haraam and is not permissible for them to look at. One of the things that is forbidden to them is looking at women who are not their mahrams, just as the same command is also addressed to women, to avert their gaze from that which Allah, may He be exalted, has forbidden. One of the things that is forbidden to women is to look at men who are not their mahrams. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Tell the believing men to avert their gaze and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what they do. And tell the believing women to avert their gaze and guard their private parts…” [an-Noor 24:30-31]. It is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman when there is a need to do so, which includes looking at her when buying and selling, giving testimony, giving or receiving medical treatment, and proposing marriage. As for looking with desire, that is forbidden according to scholarly consensus. See the cases in which it is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman in the answer to question no. 2198. The questioner did not mention the reason why he needs to look at hijabi women in his city. If what he meant was any of the reasons that we have mentioned which make it permissible to look, then there is nothing wrong with that, so long as he looks only as much as is necessary and does not go beyond that, because the basic principle is that he should avert his gaze, as mentioned in the verses quoted above. If he wants to look at them because he is simply talking to them without there being any of the cases of necessity that we have mentioned above, or similar reasons, then he is clearly enjoined to also avert his gaze from the one who is speaking to him, especially if she is young and there is no guarantee that there will be no temptation; in fact temptation and its causes are widespread. See the answer to question no. 114196 for further explanation. Among other things, we said there: With regard to a hijabi woman who uncovers her face only – despite the fact that she is going against the more correct shar‘i ruling which dictates that it is obligatory for a woman to cover her face – when there is a need for a man to deal with her for the purpose of buying, selling, helping, teaching, medical treatment, testimony, proposing marriage and so on, it is permissible to look at her face as much as is necessary, on condition that that is not accompanied by desire and there is no fear that he will be tempted.… End quote. And Allah knows best. #08. Ruling on women looking at men.? Is it permissible for a woman to look at men who are not her mahrams, or is that haram?. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on a woman looking at a man on TV or looking in an ordinary fashion in the street? He replied: When women look at men, whether that is on TV or otherwise, one of the following two scenarios must apply: 1 – Looking with desire and enjoyment, which is haram because of the evil and fitnah (temptation) involved 2 – Simply looking with no desire or enjoyment; there is nothing wrong with this according to the correct scholarly view, and this is permissible because it was proven that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) watched the Ethiopians when they were playing in the mosque, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was screening her from them, and he approved of her doing that. Women walk in the markets and look at men even when they are wearing hijab, so a woman may look at a man even when he does not look at her, on condition that there be no feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation). If there are any feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation) then it is haram to look, whether the man is on TV or otherwise. #09. Evidence Prohibiting of Mixing of Men and Women.? My husband and I wanted to know if it were permissable to take Arabic classes at a college where the classes are mixed (men-women). We understand that there is no mixing between the sexes, but confused about the definition of "mixing". Please tell us what is permissible, what is not and give proof. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: The meeting together, mixing, and intermingling of men and women in one place, the crowding of them together, and the revealing and exposure of women to men are prohibited by the Law of Islam (Shari'ah). These acts are prohibited because they are among the causes for fitnah (temptation or trial which implies evil consequences), the arousing of desires, and the committing of indecency and wrongdoing. Among the many proofs of prohibition of the meeting and mixing of men and women in the Quran and Sunnah are: Verse No. 53 of Surat al-Ahzab, or the Confederates (Interpretation of the meaning); "...for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs..." In explaining this Verse, Ibn Kathir (May Allah have mercy on him) said: "Meaning, as I forbade you to enter their rooms, I forbid you to look at them at all. If one wants to take something from them, one should do so without looking at them. If one wants to ask a woman for something, the same has to be done from behind a screen." The Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) enforced separation of men and women even at Allah’s most revered and preferred place, the mosque. This was accomplished via the separation of the women’s rows from the men’s; men were asked to stay in the mosque after completion of the obligatory prayer so that women will have enough time to leave the mosque; and, a special door was assigned to women. Evidence of the foregoing are: Umm Salamah (May Allah be pleased with her) said that after Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said "as-Salamu ‘Alaykum wa Rahmatullah’ twice announcing the end of prayer, women would stand up and leave. He would stay for a while before leaving. Ibn Shihab said that he thought that the staying of the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) was in order for the women to be able to leave before the men who wanted to depart." Narrated by al-Bukhari under No. 793. Abu Dawood under No. 876 narrates the same hadith in Kitab al-Salaat under the title "Insiraaf an-Nisaa’ Qabl al-Rijaal min al-Salaah" (Departure of Women before Men after the Prayer). Ibn ‘Umar said that Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: "We should leave this door (of the mosque) for women." Naafi’ said: "Ibn ‘Umar never again entered through that door until he died." Narrated by Abu Dawood under No. 484 in "Kitab as-Salah" under the Chapter entitled: "at-Tashdid fi Thalik". Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: ""The best of the men’s rows is the first and the worst is the last, and the best of the women’s rows is the last and the worst in the first." Narrated by Muslim under No. 664. This is the greatest evidence that the Law of Islam (Shari'ah) forbids meeting and mixing of men and women. The farther the men are from the women’s rows, the better, and vice versa. If these procedures and precautions were prescribed and adhered to in a mosque, which is a pure place of worship where people are as far away as they ever are from the arousal of desire and temptation, then no doubt the same procedures need to be followed even more rigorously at other places. Abu Usayd al-Ansari narrated that he heard Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) say to the women on his way out of the mosque when he saw men and women mixing together on their way home: ‘Give way (i.e., walk to the sides) as it is not appropriate for you to walk in the middle the road.’ Thereafter, women would walk so close to the wall that their dresses would get caught on it. Narrated by Abu Dawood in "Kitab al-Adab min Sunanihi, Chapter: Mashyu an-Nisa Ma’ ar-Rijal fi at-Tariq."We know that the intermingling, mixing and crowding together of men and women is part of today’s unavoidable yet regrettable affliction in most places, such as markets, hospitals, colleges, etc., but: · We will not willfully choose or accept mixing and crowding, particularly in religious classes and council meetings in Islamic Centers. · We take precautions to avoid meeting and mixing of men and women as much as possible while at the same time achieving desired goals and objectives. This result can be achieved by designating separate places assigned for men and women, using different doors for each, utilizing modern means of communication such as microphones, video recorders etc., and expediting efforts to have enough female teachers to teach women, etc. · We show fear of Allah as much as we can by not looking at members of the opposite sex and by applying self-restraint. There follow some of the results of a study on mixing undertaken by some Muslim social science researchers. #10. When we put the following question: What is the Islamic ruling on mixing as far as you know? The results were as follows: 76% of respondents said “It is not permitted.” 12% said, “It is permitted” – but moral, religious, etc. restrictions apply… 12% said, “I don’t know.” Which would you choose? If you had the choice between working in a mixed workplace and working in another where there was no mixing, which would you choose? The responses to this question were as follows: 76% would choose the workplace where there was no mixing. 9% preferred the mixed workplace. 15% would accept any workplace which suited their specialties, regardless of whether it was mixed or not. Very embarrassing Have any embarrassing situations ever happened to you because of mixing? Among the embarrassing moments mentioned by respondents in this study were the following: I was at work one day, and I went into one department where one of my female colleagues who wears hijaab had taken off her hijaab in front of her female colleagues. My entrance took her by surprise and I was very embarrassed as a result. I had to do an experiment in the lab at university, but I was absent on the day of the experiment. I had to go to the lab on the following day, and I found myself the only male among a group of female students, in addition to a female teacher and a female lab technician. I was very embarrassed and felt very awkward with all those female eyes glaring at me. I was trying to take a feminine towel out of one of the drawers when I was surprised by a male colleague standing behind me, who wanted to take something from his own private drawer. He noticed that I was embarrassed and he left the room quickly to avoid my embarrassment. It so happened that one of the girls at the university bumped into me when turning a corner in a crowded corridor. She was walking quickly, going to one of the lectures. As a result of this collision, she lost her balance, and I caught her in my arms, as if I was embracing her. You can imagine how embarrassed I and this girl felt in front of a group of careless young people. One of my female colleagues fell on the stairs in the university and her clothes fell open in an extremely embarrassing fashion. She landed upside down and could not help herself; the young men standing nearby had no option but to cover her and help her to get up. I work in a company and I went in to give some papers to my boss. When I was going out, my boss called me back. I turned around and saw him with his face turned away. I was waiting for him to ask me for a file or for more papers, and I was surprised by his hesitancy. I turned away to the left side of his office, pretending to be busy with something, and he spoke to me at the same time. I thought that this boss would say anything except what he actually said, which was to point out that my garment was stained with menstrual blood. Can the earth open up and swallow a human being at the moment of making sincere supplication? For I prayed that the earth would open up and swallow me. Victims of mixing… True stories Lost hope Umm Muhammad, a mature woman over the age of 40, tells her story. I lived a life of modest means with my husband. There was never any closeness and harmony, and my husband did not have the kind of strong personality that a woman would hope for, but his good nature made me overlook the fact that I was the one who was responsible for most of the decision making in the family. My husband often used to mention the name of his friend and business partner, and he would talk about him in my presence, and I often used to meet with him in his office which was originally part of our apartment. This went on for many years, until circumstances led to us exchanging visits with this person and his family. These family visits were repeated and because of his close friendship with my husband, we did not notice how the number of visits increased and how many hours a single visit would last. He often used to come on his own to sit with us, me and my husband, for long visits. My husband’s trust in him knew no bounds, and as days passed I got to know this person very well, and saw how wonderful and decent he was. I began to feel a strong attraction towards this man, and at the same time I began to sense that the feeling was mutual. Things took a strange turn after that, when I realized that this man was the kind of person I had always dreamed about. Why had he come along now, after all these years? The more this man’s status increased in my eyes, the more my husband’s status diminished. It was as if I had needed to see the beauty of his character in order to discover how ugly my husband’s character was. The matter between this person and myself did not go beyond these persistent thoughts which were occupying my mind night and day. Neither he nor I ever voiced what we felt in our hearts… until today. Yet despite that my life is over and my husband is little more than a weak man with no self-esteem. I hate him and I do not know how all this hatred towards him started to boil over. I wonder how I put up with him all these years, bearing all these burdens by myself, facing life’s problems on my own. Things got so bad that I asked him for a divorce, and he divorced me at my request. After that he became a broken man. Even worse than that is that after my marriage was wrecked and my children and husband were devastated, problems arose in this man's family. His wife, with her feminine intuition, realized what had been going on in his heart of hearts, and his life became hell. She was overwhelmed with jealousy to the extent that one night she left her house at 2 a.m. and came to attack my house, screaming, weeping and hurling accusations. His marriage was also about to collapse. I admit that the lovely gatherings which we used to enjoy gave us the opportunity to get to know one another at a time that was not appropriate at this stage in our lives. His marriage has been wrecked and so has mine. I have lost everything, and now I know that my circumstances and his will not permit us to take any positive step towards coming together. Now I am more miserable than I have ever been, and I am looking for illusionary happiness and lost hopes. Tit-for-tat Umm Ahmad tells us: My husband had a group of married friends, and because of our close friendship with them, we used to get together with them once a week in one of our houses, to enjoy an evening of chat. Deep down in my heart I was never really comfortable with the atmosphere in which we would have dinner, sweets, snacks and drinks of juice accompanied by waves of laughter because of the jokes and chit-chats that often went beyond the bounds of good manners. In the name of friendship, the barriers were lifted and every now and then one would hear suppressed laughter between a woman and the husband of another woman. The jokes were too much, dealing – with no sense of shyness –with sensitive topics such as sex and women’s private matters. This was usual and was even accepted and regarded as desirable. Although I indulged in these things along with them, my conscience made me feel guilty. Then the day came when it became quite clear just how ugly and filthy this atmosphere was. The telephone rang, and I heard the voice of one of the friends in this group. I said hello to him and apologized that my husband was not home. He replied that he knew that, and that he was calling to speak to me! After he suggested starting a relationship with me, I got very angry and spoke harshly to him and cursed him. All he could do was laugh and say, “Don’t try and show these good manners to me; go and check on your husband’s good manners and see what he is doing…” I was devastated by what he said, but I pulled myself together and said to myself, this person is only trying to cause the break up of your marriage. But he succeeded in planting the seeds of doubt concerning my husband. Shortly after that, the major disaster struck. I discovered that my husband was cheating on me with another woman. It was the matter of life or death as far as I was concerned. I found my husband out and I confronted him, saying: “You are not the only one who can have a relationship. I have received a similar proposition.” And I told him all about his friend. He was stunned and absolutely shocked. (I said:) “If you want me to respond in kind to your relationship with that woman, then this is for that, tit-for-tat.” This was a huge slap in the face for him. He knew that I did not intend to do that in reality, but he realized the great disaster that had befallen our lives and the immoral atmosphere in which we were living. I suffered a great deal until my husband finally left that loose woman with whom he was having a relationship, as he admitted to me. Yes, he left her and came back to his family and children, but how can I ever feel the same towards him as I used to? Who will restore respect for him in my heart? This huge wound in my heart is still bleeding out of regret and rage at that filthy atmosphere; it still bears testimony to the fact that what they call innocent get-togethers are in reality anything but innocent. My heart still begs for mercy from the Lord of Glory. Intelligence can also be a temptation (fitnah) ‘Abd al-Fattaah says: I work as the head of department in one of the big companies. For a long time I admired one of my female colleagues, not for her beauty, but for her serious attitude towards her work, her intelligence and her excellent achievements – in addition to the fact that she was a decent and modest person who focused only on her work. This admiration turned into attachment, and I am a married man who fears Allah and never misses any obligatory prayer. I expressed my feelings to her and she rebuffed me. She is married and has children as well. She sees no reason why I should have any kind of relationship with her, whether it be friendship, as work colleagues or based on admiration… etc. Evil thoughts come to me sometimes, and deep down I wish that her husband would divorce her so that I could get her. I started to put pressure on her at work and put her down in front of my bosses. Perhaps this was a form of revenge on my part, but she accepted it with good manners and did not complain or comment. She works and works; her performance speaks of her quality, and she knows this well. The more she resisted me, the stronger my infatuation grew. I am not a person who is easily tempted by women, because I fear Allah and I do not overstep the mark with them and go beyond what is required by my work. But this woman attracted me. What is the solution?… I do not know. Baby ducks know how to swim N.A.A., a nineteen-year-old girl, tells us: At that time I was a little girl. My innocent eyes watched those evening get-togethers when family friends would meet in the house. What I remember is that I could only see one man, who was my father. I watched him as he moved about the room, how his glances would devour the women present, looking at their thighs and chests, admiring this one’s eyes, that one’s hair, the other’s hips. My poor mother had no choice but to take care of these get-togethers. She was a very simple lady. Among the women present there was one woman who would deliberately try to attract my father’s attention, sometimes by coming close to him, and sometimes by making enticing movements. I would watch this with concern, whilst my mother was busy in the kitchen for the sake of her guests. These gatherings stopped suddenly and I tried, young as I was, to understand and make sense of what had happened, but I could not. What I remember was that my mother collapsed completely at that time, and she could not stand to hear my father’s name mentioned in the house. I used to hear mysterious words whispered by the adults around me: “Betrayal… bedroom… she saw them with her own eyes… despicable woman… in a very shameful position…” etc. These were the key words which only the adults could understand. I grew up and came to understand, and I bore a grudge against all men. All of them were treacherous. My mother was a broken woman and accused every woman who came to us of being a man-snatcher who wanted to make my father fall into her trap. My father hasn’t changed. He is still practising his favourite hobby of chasing women, but now he does it outside the home. Now I am nineteen years old and I know lots of young men. I feel great pleasure in taking revenge on them, because every one of them is an exact copy of my father. I tempt them and entice them, without letting them get anywhere near me. They follow me in gatherings and in the marketplaces because of my movements and deliberate gestures. Sometimes my phone never stops ringing and I feel proud of what I do to avenge the sex of Hawwa’ and my mother. But sometimes I feel so miserable and such a failure that it almost chokes me. My life is shadowed by a huge dark cloud, and its name is my father. Before it is too late S.N.A. tells of her experience: I never imagined that my work circumstances would force me to be in contact with the opposite sex (men), but this in fact is what happened… In the beginning, I used to cover and screen myself from men by wearing niqaab (face-veil), but some of the sisters advised me that this dress was attracting more attention to my presence, and it would be better for me to take off the niqaab, especially since my eyes were somewhat attractive. So I removed the cover from my face, thinking that this was better. But by continuing to mix with my colleagues, I discovered that I was the odd one out because of my antisocial attitude and my insistence on not joining in the conversation and chatting with others. Everyone was wary of this “lone-wolf” woman (as they saw me), and this is what was stated clearly by one person who affirmed that he would not want to deal with such a snooty and stand-offish character. But I knew that I was the opposite, in fact, and I decided that I would not oppress myself and put myself in a difficult position with my colleagues. So I started to join in their chats and exchanges of anecdotes, and they all discovered that I could speak eloquently and persuasively, and that I could influence others. I could also speak in a manner that was determined yet at the same time was attractive to some of my colleagues. It was not long before I noticed some changes in the expression of my direct supervisor; with some embarrassment, he was enjoying the way I spoke and moved, and he would deliberately bring up topics in the conversation where I would see that hateful look in his eyes. I do not deny the fact that I started to entertain some thoughts about this man. I found it astonishing that a man could fall so easily into the trap of a woman who was religiously committed, so how must it be in the case of women who adorn themselves and invite men to commit immoral actions? In fact, I did not think of him in any way which went beyond the bounds of sharee’ah, but he did occupy a space in my thoughts for quite some time. But soon my self-respect made me reject the idea of being a source of enjoyment for this man in any way, shape or form, even if it was only psychological in nature, and I stopped getting involved in any kind of work that would force me to sit alone with him. In the end, I reached the following conclusions: 1- Attraction between the sexes can occur in any circumstances, no matter how much men and women may deny that. The attraction may start within the bounds of sharee’ah and end up going beyond those bounds. 2- Even if a person protects himself (by marriage), he is not safe from the snares of the Shaytaan. 3- Even though a person may be able to guarantee himself and he works with the opposite sex within reasonable limits, he cannot guarantee the feelings of the other party. Finally, there is nothing good in mixing and it does not bear fruit as they claim. On the contrary, it corrupts sound thinking. What now? We may ask, what comes next, after this discussion on the matter of mixing? It’s about time for us to recognize that no matter how we try to beautify the issue of mixing and take the matter lightly, its consequences are bound to catch up with us, and the harm it causes will have disastrous results for our families. Sound common sense refuses to accept that mixing is a healthy atmosphere for human relations. This is the sound common sense which made most of the people included in this survey (76%) prefer working in a non-mixed environment. The same percentage (76%) said that mixing is not permitted according to the sharee’ah. What makes us sit up and take notice is not this honourable percentage – which indicates the purity of our Islamic society and the cleanness of its members’ hearts – but the small number who said that mixing is permitted; they number 12%. This group, with no exceptions, said that mixing is permitted but within the limits set by religion, custom (‘urf), traditions, good manners, conscience, modesty, covering and other worthy values which, in their opinion, keep mixing within proper limits. We ask them: is the mixing which we see nowadays in our universities, market-places, work-places and family and social gatherings, taking place within the limits referred to above? Or are these places filled with transgressions in terms of clothing, speech, interactions and behaviour? We see wanton displays of adornment (tabarruj), not proper covering; we see fitnah (temptations) and dubious relationships, with no good manners and no conscience and no covering. We can conclude that the kind of mixing that is happening nowadays is unacceptable even to those who approve of mixing in a clean atmosphere. It’s about time for us to recognize that mixing provides a fertile breeding-ground for social poisons to invade and take over our society without anyone ever realizing that it is mixing which is the cause. Mixing is the prime element in this silent fitnah, in the shade of which betrayals erupt, homes are wrecked and hearts are broken. We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound, and to reform our society. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad. #11. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only. According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. #12. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave". Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf #13. The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now! They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently. Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence: Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.” Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing. These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression. This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.” Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day. The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights. #14. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam. Quranic verses include: Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…” Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…” Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…” Examples of Hadith include: Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.” Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’” Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it. Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’” Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’” These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion. Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? -https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

So New York City Police Department Is Educating All Women In The 5 Boroughs Of (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, The Bronx, and Staten Island). Who Came To 3rd Annual World Hijab Day Celebrated By NYPD At Jalsa Restaurant Brooklyn New York In Coordination With Raja Community Center Feb 6, 2025. The Public On How To Properly Wear A Hijab-Burqa Shows By Sgt. Aml Elsokary A Demonstrating How To Put On A Hijab While In Her Police Uniform Or Maybe You Will Die! So Good Evening ("Kafir") Infidels... Allahu Akbar... "God Is The Greatest" So This A Wake Up Call To All America Muslim Women Who Are Still Alive Today. Nearly 50 years later, Muslim women are still protesting. So much so that defying hijab laws can be punishable by death. And in Iran and now in America, freedom comes at a deadly cost. A woman's choice to unveil can now lead to flogging, prison, and even execution. The new hijab law enforces harsh penalties for those who defy strict dress codes. Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Americastan Is Under Sharia Laws. The Real Zohran Mamdani Victory Speech... Death To America ? Yes Sexually Assaulted And Grooming Gang See You Seen? See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil There Is No Christian Freedom Of Religion Left Today In America ? Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... All White Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period - https://rumble.com/v72k824-islam-a-religion-of-justice-and-not-of-peace...-all-white-non-muslims-our-k.html Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... The Dangers Of Radical Islam In 5 Minute Video... Anyone Who Ever Leave Islam Will Die... So All White America Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period Today July 04, 2026 Will Go Down In Jihad History Death To USA. Some 92% Of All Muslims Alive Today USA Believe That Jihad Is Primarily A Call To Holy War Against All Skin Color Of Any Nonbelievers, Sinners, Heretics, And Apostates. Zohran Mamdani's Victory Speech 11/04-2025 Now Confirmed Everything We Feared About...? Yes Close To One Million Muslims Already Living In NYC Right Now. And Planning To Move In 2 Million More Muslims By Dec. 31, 2026... As Millions Of Jews, Transgender And Whites Persons Start Moving Out Fast With There Money. Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's A Republic Of New York City-State And Is Now Under Islamic And Sharia Laws A Democratic Control Socialist Communist Country... Soon To Be Muslim Hell Hole As Planned For Americastan And We Now Have The Right To Kill You Under Islamic Law And Sharia Laws Today. So New York City-State 11/04/2025 Is Now A New Country Called We The Non-White Citizen's Of The People's Republic Of Americastan 2026. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Iran and Now U.S.A. New York City: UN experts call for strict new hijab law to be repealed ? Iranian and now America women and girls now face prison terms of up to 15 years and possible death sentences for failing to wear a hijab, through a new strict law on religious dress and behavior that was due to take effect world wide. Independent UN Human Rights Council-appointed experts said in a statement that it represents a fundamental attack on women’s rights. The legislation, which applies to children as young as 12, combines severe criminal penalties with mandatory citizen surveillance and systematic enforcement across all sectors of society, the experts added. The Law on Protecting the Family through the Promotion of the Culture of Chasity and Hijab, represents what experts describe as “an intensification of State control over women’s bodies in Iran and a further assault on women’s rights and freedoms”. Soaring In The Polls As Pauline Hanson’s Burqa Act Was Justified After Bill Was Denied For Debate - https://rumble.com/v72mlk6-soaring-in-the-polls-as-pauline-hansons-burqa-act-was-justified-after-bill-.html Sky News host Rowan Dean defends One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson’s burqa stunt because she has been “shut down” and “denied” the opportunity to debate the wearing of the burqa for Muslim women. “There was a veritable conga line of cowards this week lining up to condemn Pauline Hanson's burqa stunt this week in parliament. I say cowards because not only were they not prepared to hold a debate in parliament about banning the burqa, but they roundly turned on and condemned the one politician who was brave enough to propose the debate,” Mr Dean said. “The stunt came after that denial, not before. At that point, it went from being a stunt to a legitimate form of protest, no different, whether one likes it or not. “Pauline's protest was entirely justified. And I have no doubt that not only will it attract even more support to her party, but also the vehement reaction by Coalition politicians against it will drive even more conservatives away from the Liberal Party. “ Existing restrictions The new legislation expands existing restrictions, targeting women and girls who fail to wear a hijab in both physical and online spaces. While the hijab requirements were already mandatory under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, this new law introduces dramatically harsher consequences. Violations can now result in extended prison sentences of up to 15 years and substantially increased fines. Most concerning to human rights experts is the provision allowing judges to impose the death penalty under the charge of “corruption on earth”. Systematic impact on Iranian society The law’s reach extends far beyond individual enforcement, embedding mandatory veiling and “culture of chastity” principles deep within Iranian society, the independent experts said. Educational curricula, training programs and public information campaigns must now incorporate these concepts, effectively creating a State-sanctioned value system that experts warn will severely limit freedom of expression and belief. “The law constitutes clear violation of fundamental human rights, legal norms and principles, including women’s rights to equality, freedom of expression, religion and belief, bodily autonomy, liberty, security and privacy, “the experts emphasised. ‘Climate of fear’ Additionally, the law’s approach to enforcement transforms ordinary citizens into agents of the State. The legislation requires individuals, families, and businesses to report instances of unveiling while also mandating extensive use of technology for enforcement purposes. “These requirements will create a climate of fear and distrust among individuals and communities,” the experts warned, noting that severe economic punishments would likely hit vulnerable populations and groups including children, young persons, and social media users. Long term consequences The experts said that the enforcement will likely escalate violence against women and girls while further embedding systematic gender-based discrimination. Harsh penalties along with citizen surveillance and institutional enforcement creates what they describe as a comprehensive system of gender-based persecution. Brigitte Gabriel Speech About Radical Islamic State Of Americastan Never Wanted You To Hear Today - https://rumble.com/v728j92-brigitte-gabriel-speech-about-radical-islamic-state-of-americastan-never-wa.html Brigitte Gabriel Speech About Radical Islamic State 1400 Years of Conquest, Slavery and Murder-Genocide Provides A Facts-Based Timeline Of Events In World History Since The Introduction Of Islam. 1,400 Years Of Christian/Islamic Struggle: An Analysis For Reader Today. We have failed our children. Thus the lack of patriotism we are seeing. I agree with this woman. I admire her bravery for speaking in public. May God bless her. I fact checked a few things said by her video dead on correct! I was very disappointed to see that U.S. News would publish a clearly false article, adopting the world's clearly false, politically correct (PC) view of the place of the Crusades in history. What makes it even worse, the article hides its views under the additional headline falsehood, "The Truth About the Epic Clash Between Christianity and Islam." “We call upon the Government of Iran to immediately repeal the Hijab and Chasity Law and all other discriminatory legislation that perpetuates gender-based persecution,” the experts said, whilst confirming that they are in contact with the Government on this matter. Special Rapporteurs and other independent rights experts are not UN staff, receive no salary for their work and have no connection to any government. They serve in their individual capacity. The hijab is mine': Muslim women take back their rights from US law enforcement... Women in US have been repeatedly forced to take their hijabs off in police custody, but a series of cases show that fighting back is having an impact Police officers stand by as people take part in a rally called "I Am A Muslim Too", on 19 February 2017 in New York City. Alaa Massri was just 18 years old when she was arrested. It was the summer of 2020. Hundreds of thousands of people across the United States were protesting against the murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who was killed while being arrested for allegedly using a counterfeit bill. Massri helped organise some of the protests in Miami, Florida. She proudly wore her hijab - as she had for the past 12 years - grabbed a megaphone, marched, and demanded justice. More than 10,000 people were arrested during the George Floyd protests condemning racism and police brutality across the US - and Massri was one of them. But what set Massri's arrest apart from the others was that she was asked to remove her hijab for the booking photo. Massri explained to officers that the head covering was a religious obligation and that she would not take it off. But no one listened. Instead, an officer yanked the hijab off her head and the photo was taken. Now Massri’s hijab-less picture was out in cyberspace. The hair she had carefully hidden from the world began circulating on social media, with people and spam accounts harassing her. Some even tried to sell the mugshot for thousands of dollars. “I felt naked. I felt completely stripped of all control,” Massri told Middle East Eye while recalling what she felt at that moment. "I felt so blatantly disrespected." “[The hijab] is my protection. This is something I cherish, and to have it just ripped and yanked off with no regard or respect? It felt like all my power was gone.” Massri’s story is just one of many. There are no federal laws to protect a woman's right to continue wearing a hijab when arrested, and no laws to prevent officers from removing it or asking for it to be removed. Considered to be obligatory in Islam, the hijab is a head covering worn by Muslim women who choose to wear it. It can be a symbol of modesty and privacy or cultural identity deeply rooted in Islamic traditions. Many wear it around men who are not considered their "mahram" - a male family member with whom marriage is considered unlawful. Therefore, if asked to be removed in front of strangers, it is a violation of their religious and civic rights. “It was not just this piece of fabric that covered my hair. It was a symbol of my devotion to my religion. It was a symbol of my devotion to understanding that beauty wasn't just physical and materialistic. To have that stripped from you was something almost unbearable, "Massri said. Every state in the US has its own policy in dealing with religious coverings during arrests. After Massri’s arrest, over 330,000 people signed a petition denouncing her treatment by the county corrections department. In a statement to The Miami Herald in response to the criticism of its handling of the case, the department said it could “accommodate inmates who wear head coverings for religious reasons” and noted that it was reviewing the matter “to ensure compliance with our policies”. Massri said she is sure something clicked because five months after her arrest, she got a call from a friend at the county jail. He told her he was with a Muslim hijab-wearing woman who had just been arrested. He told her that they did not take off her hijab. “I'm grateful that I was able to fight back enough to where something good came out of it,” Massri said. And in November of the same year, two Muslim women won their own battles over the issue in New York City. A 'systematic violation' In 2017, Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz were arrested. Both were arrested six months apart but faced the same ordeal. They were asked to remove their hijabs for their booking photos. Surrounded by men, they both said no. Then, they relented. In 2018, they got together and filed a class-action civil rights lawsuit arguing that the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) “policies for photographing arrestees violate the religious rights of any civilian forced to remove religious head coverings that leave the face unobstructed. It could apply to the hijab of a Muslim, the skullcap or wig of an Orthodox Jew or the turban of a Sikh”. In 2020, in an effort to settle the lawsuit, the NYPD agreed to change its policy and allow religious observers to be photographed in head coverings so long as their faces were left unobstructed. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the NYPD was to revise its patrol guide to reflect the new policy and train officers. The settlement stated that exceptions could occur during contraband or weapons inspections, or if an officer perceives that the headgear poses a threat to the safety of others. Albert Fox Cahn is a lawyer who represents Clark and Aziz. While the police department changed its policy, he says the women are still fighting to seek damages to hold the NYPD accountable for past violations. “When we see a large dollar figure attached to this systematic violation of the First Amendment, it will make other police departments think twice about policies that force removal of religious wear,” Cahn told Middle East Eye. In 2017, the city of Long Beach, California, agreed to pay $85,000 to settle a federal lawsuit filed by a Muslim woman whose hijab was pulled off by a male officer while she was in police custody. Her lawsuit, filed in 2016, prompted the Long Beach Police Department to reverse its policy barring people from wearing religious head coverings. In February 2018, the NYPD settled a case filed by three Muslim women for separate incidents concerning the forcible removal of their hijabs, including during mugshots while in custody. A month later in New York, another Muslim woman settled a fourth case against the department on similar grounds. In total, the department paid out at least $265,000 for the four incidents. But while there is progress being made in police departments throughout the country, in other parts of the US, women are still being forced to remove their hijabs. Just last month, a Muslim woman from Grand Rapids, Michigan, sued the Kent County Sheriff’s Office because she was forced to remove her hijab for a booking photo. Cahn explained that there’s an interesting relationship between the criminal justice system and the religious obligations of people. The First Amendment of the US Consitution protects several basic freedoms in the US, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and the right to petition the government. In 1990, a high-profile case, Employment Division v Smith, led to the Supreme Court ruling that the First Amendment does not protect individuals engaging in illegal acts as part of a religious ceremony. Following the ruling, in 1993 Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which "ensures that interests in religious freedom are protected". And in 2000, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prohibits the government from imposing a "substantial burden" on prisoners' religious practices unless officials can show a compelling need for the restrictions. “Prisons have huge amounts of power over those they hold in their custody. What RLUIPA tries to do is make sure that power is not abused in a way to systematically target religious beliefs and practices,” Cahn said. “Which is why we are able to fight for these women,” he said. A counterintuitive act When a person is arrested, a booking photo (or mugshot, colloquially) is taken of them to identify them and keep a record. Women who wear the hijab are generally identified by their hijabs. They wear their hijabs in their driver's license photos, passport photos, and in public when they leave their homes. So it’s counterintuitive when law enforcement force women to take off their hijabs, Aida Shyef al-Kadi, told Middle East Eye. In 2013, Kadi received a traffic citation for driving without her licence. In June of that year, she missed a court date because she said she had to take her daughter to the hospital for an emergency. Soon after, a judge issued a warrant for her arrest. After she turned herself in, she said the Ramsey County officers told her to take off her hijab and abaya (loose-fitting garment some women wear over their clothes). She said she objected because there were men present. But once she objected, she said she was pushed into a holding cell where she was asked to take her hijab off in front of a male officer. Kadi said she agreed to remove her hijab for a booking photo after being promised the picture wouldn’t be released to the public. In the meantime, she claimed that the officers gave her a bedsheet and then a T-shirt to use as a hijab. She was kept in her cell for 23 hours for “argumentative behavior". The next day, when she was released, she found that her booking photo had become a public record and was available for release upon request. So, she filed a lawsuit, and a settlement was reached. In 2014, Ramsey County updated its policies to ensure that Muslim women who wear the hijab won’t be forced to remove their head coverings in front of men. The county now offers Muslim women jail-approved headscarves. As part of the settlement, the county Sheriff’s Office has to train corrections officers on how to offer religious accommodations to those arrested. The county also agreed to destroy hard and electronic versions of her booking photo. In 2019, Kadi received a $120,000 settlement from the county. She told Middle East Eye that a lot of people, especially Muslims, questioned her on why she decided to pursue such a long battle. But to her, the answer is simple. “The hijab is mine. It belongs to me. It’s my freedom. It’s my right. It’s my faith. It's mine,” she said. “I am a Muslim and the only way you can identify me from a non-Muslim is by my hijab. It’s mine and so I fought for it. It was like a war. They wanted to take something that belonged to me just because I made a mistake.” For Massri, her relationship with the hijab became more complicated. So complicated, that she no longer wears one. “I felt a lot of guilt for not being strong enough in defending myself. I know it’s jail and I can’t really defend myself. But there was so much guilt. I couldn’t keep it on," she said. After the protests, Massri went viral on social media. People were stalking her and breaking into her car, and she felt overwhelmed. Every day when she would look in the mirror, she did not recognise herself and she felt like she didn’t deserve to wear the hijab anymore. “I didn't know who that girl was looking back at me. Every time I’d look in the mirror, I would just remember the power they had to take my hijab off,” she said. For Massri, the hijab was a part of her body. It was not something she felt anyone could control. “So taking it off myself, I felt like I regained control. And I regained power in the sense that no one else could take it off besides me. It was mine." Islamophobia in American policing If removing hijabs for booking photos to identify women is counterintuitive, then why are they asked to do it? Cahn believes a lot of it has to do with Islamophobia being intertwined with so many aspects of American policing. He explained that we see such examples in the NYPD, for example, when the department systematically targeted Muslims by surveilling them, othering the community in the process. In 2011, an Associated Press investigation found that the NYPD religiously profiled and surveilled NYC Muslims in an attempt to find "radicalization", mapping out communities, conducting video surveillance, recruiting informants, and generating intelligence databases since 2002. “We see it endemically throughout policing that oftentimes Islam is viewed through a lens of suspicion. We see other cities, and not I'm not talking about just New York City, that have policies that are clearly designed to target Muslim residents and punish them." Kadi remembers the moment she was asked to take off her hijab. She said she saw so much anger in the officer. “It felt like they were angry at the sight of my hijab,” she said. She said she remembers the officer telling her that other Muslim women who get arrested don't care about the hijab. She said she had tried explaining to them that not every woman has to care. “It felt like they were not accepting of others who are not like them. They couldn’t see America's diversity. They couldn’t see me as somebody.” Massri believes it’s a power trip. She believes that the officers who take hijabs off want to take pleasure in having that much power. “It’s about them knowing they can hide behind that badge and nothing will happen to them,” she said. She explained that in jail, there were no clocks or windows to tell the time of day. “So they do this on purpose. At the end of the day, it’s just to strip you of your humanity.” Niqab vs Hijab vs Burka What Is the Difference? The main difference between a hijab and a burka lies in how much they cover. The hijab is a headscarf that covers the head, neck, and shoulders but leaves the face completely visible. On the other hand, the burka gives covering the entire body including face and some times hands, with a mesh screen for vision. The Islamic world is experiencing a rise in women wearing the burqa claiming it to be part of the Islamic dress code. Whether it is worn by choice or force is open to debate as very few women are able to, or prefer not to voice an opinion on the matter. Those who have, generally argue against the compulsory (by law as in Afghanistan) wearing of this garment with a minority claiming the right to wear it citing Quranic and prophetic instruction. A Burqa is an outer garment worn by women in Islamic societies for the purpose of concealing their bodies and/or face. It is mostly worn when a woman leaves her home and is compelled to wear it until she returns. The burqa is worn throughout Middle Eastern nations and most Muslim nations around the world, with a few liberal or democratic governments being less strict about its use. One such famous example is Turkey, where secular ideas prevail and give people the freedom to choose. Meanwhile, in stricter nations, women are forced to wear the burqa; failure to do so can result in beatings, harassment or worse. Obviously a woman wears a burqa but more specifically, conservative practicing Muslims wear it. Girls are not mandated to wear a burqa until they reach puberty but this notion is not practiced, as girls as young as six are made to wear the burqa to physically and mentally prepare them for adult life. Burqa falls under the category of Hijab. This is an Arabic word which means to veil or cover and refers to a woman’s head and body covering. In Saudi Arabia, women wear a loose robe called abaya and a face veil called niqab, while in nations like Tunisia or Turkey; Muslim women tend to wear only a headscarf. In Iran, they take a step further and the “fashion police” mandate all women to wear loose clothing – preferably a black or white robe – when going out, women are also supposed to wear either a full face veil or scarf. One of the extremes of burqa is the Afghan burqa, which was enforced by the Taliban. This burqa covers the entire body in loose clothing with the face (including eyes) being covered with only a grille for the women to look through. The Dress Code in the Quran for women Introduction: Before presenting the Quranic rules for women's dress, it is essential to be reminded of the following: 1- The Quran is the only source of law authorized by God (6:114). 2- The Quran is complete and fully detailed (6:38, 6:114, 16:89 and 12:111). 3- God calls on His true believers to make sure not to fall into the trap of shirk by following the words of the scholars instead of the words of God (9:31). 4- God condemns those who prohibit what He has not prohibited (5:87, 6:140, 6:150, 7:32, 10:59, and 16:116). 5- Those who invent laws that were never authorized by God, and also those who follow such laws, are guilty of committing shirk: Or do they have partners who legislate for them of the religion what God did not authorize? Had it not been for a decisive Word, they would have already been judged. Indeed, the transgressors shall have a painful punishment. 42:21 The words 'shuraka' (partners) indicate that those who commit such sins are in fact setting partners with God in His exclusive right of lawmaking. The command to follow the Quran alone is spelt out clearly in the Quran, see: Why Quran alone The following are the Quranic guidelines for women's dress: First Rule: The Best Garment O Children of Adam, We have brought down to you garments to cover your bodies, as well as for adornment, yet the garment of reverence is the best. These are some of God's signs. May you take heed. 7:26 Revering God is the most important guideline for women when they choose their dress. The righteous reverent woman will know that God is always watching her, she will therefore dress modestly and in line with God's requirements for decency and morality. Any woman knows full well what clothes are considered decent and what clothes are revealing, she will not need to be told. This is why God set the rule of reverence as the first rule. Second Rule: Cover your Cleavage The second rule can be found in 24:31. God commanded women to cover their cleavage. Before reviewing 24:31, it is necessary to address some key Quranic words which have been subject to manipulation by those who enforce non-Quranic dress rules on women. The two words in question in 24:31 'hijab' and 'khimar'. The word 'hijab' in Islamic practice vs its use in the Quran Hijab is the term used by many Muslim women today to describe their head cover. The Arabic word 'hijab' literally means barrier or veil. Other meanings for the word 'hijab' include screen, cover(ing), mantle, curtain, drapes, partition, division, divider and barrier. The word 'hijab' is used in 7 Quranic verses. The verses are: 7:46, 17:45, 19:17, 33:53, 38:32, 41:5, 42:51 and 17:45. None of these occurrences of the word 'hijab' mean a head cover for women. God knows that there will come a time when Muslims will use the word 'hijab' to invent a dress code that God Himself never authorized. God used the word 'hijab' ahead of them just as He used the word 'hadith' ahead of them in (45:6). Historical Background: While many Muslims call 'hijab' an Islamic dress code, they are in fact oblivious of the fact that the concept of 'hijab' has nothing to do with Islam, nor with the Quran. In fact, the 'hijab' is an old Jewish tradition that infiltrated the hadith books like many innovations that contaminated Islam through the hadith. Any student of Jewish traditions would know that the head cover for the Jewish woman is encouraged by the rabbis and religious leaders. Religious Jewish women still cover their heads most of the time, especially in the synagogues, at weddings and religious festivities. This Jewish tradition is a cultural not a religious one. The 'hijab' was observed by women of the civilizations that preceded the Jews and was passed down to the Jewish culture. Some Christian women cover their heads on many religious occasions while the nuns cover their heads all the time. The tradition of covering the head was practiced thousands of years before Muslim scholars claimed the 'hijab' as a Muslim dress code. The traditional Arabs, of all religions, Jews, Christians and Muslims used to wear 'hijab', not because of Islam, but because of tradition. In Saudi Arabia for example, all men cover their heads, not because of Islam but because of tradition. North Africa is known for its Tribe (Tuareg) in which it is the Muslim men who wear the 'hijab' and not the women, a case where the tradition is reversed. In brief, 'hijab' is a traditional dress and has nothing to do with Islam or religion. In certain areas of the world, men are the ones who wear the 'hijab' while in others women do. Mixing religion with tradition is a form of idol worship since it implies setting up other sources of religious laws besides the law of God. The word 'khimar' in the Quran: The word 'khimar' can be found in the Quran in 24:31. While the first basic rule of the Dress Code for Muslim women can be found in 7:26, the second rule of the dress code for women can be found in 24:31. Some Muslims quote verse 31 of sura 24 as containing the 'hijab', or head cover, by pointing to the word, khumoorihinna, (their khimars), forgetting that God already used the word 'hijab', several times in the Quran, but none to mean head cover. Those who are not shackled by pre-conceptions will easily see that there is no command in 24:31 for women to cover their heads. The word 'khimar' does not mean 'hijab' or head cover. Those who quote this verse usually add the words "head cover" or the word "veil" after the word 'khumoorihinna', usually between brackets. These additions are their own words not the words of God and they are clearly added to the text to imply a meaning not found in God's words. The words of 24:31 are: And say to the believing women to lower their gaze and to guard their private parts, and not to show their zinat except that of it which is normally shown. They shall also cover their cleavage with their khimars. They shall not show their zinat except in the presence of their husbands, their fathers, the fathers of their husbands, their sons, the sons of their husbands, their brothers, the sons of their brothers, the sons of their sisters, other women, what their right hands possess, the male attendants who have no sexual desire and the children who are yet to attain awareness of women's nakedness. They shall not strike their feet so as to reveal details of their hidden zinat. Repent to God all of you, O believers, so that you may succeed. 24:31 The Arabic word 'zinat' means adornments. In the context of 24:31, it refers to women's bodily beauty spots that carry sexual appeal. The Arabic word khimar means cover. Any cover can be called a khimar, such as a curtain or a garment. A tablecloth that covers the top of a table can also be called a khimar. A blanket can be called a khimar, and so on. The word 'khamr', is used in the Quran for intoxicants. It is a derivative of the word khimar. Both words mean: that which covers. The khimar covers a window, a body, a table and so on, while khamr is that which covers the mind. Traditional translators, obviously influenced by hadith and culture, claim that khimar in 24:31 has only one meaning, and that is the head cover. Thus, they mislead women into believing that 24:31 commands them to cover their hair.In 24:31 God instructs women to use their khimar (cover/garment) to cover their cleavage. Covering the chest can be done by a dress, coat, shawl, shirt, blouse, scarf and so on. Third Rule: Not to reveal their zinat The third rule can also be found in 24:31. Here God commands women not to reveal their 'zinat' except what is normally apparent such as the head (face and hair), arms, lower legs, etc. Not to show their zinat except that of it which is normally shown. This expression may sound vague to many because they have not understood the mercy of God. God used the general phrase "what is normally shown" in order to allow women the freedom to decide, at different occasions, what is shown of her body. Righteous women will always make the correct decision so as to conform to the general code of morality, and also according to the time, place and occasion. The great wisdom of God in granting women this flexible concession can be witnessed every day and in every place. The following example demonstrates the application of this concession: A woman attending the masjid for prayers, or attending a funeral would wish to wear fairly conservative clothes, but a woman playing sports for example, would wish to wear simple light clothes that do not hinder movement. If God did not grant this merciful concession in 24:31, it would mean that all women would have to wear identical clothes at all occasions. The word 'zeenatahunna' (beauty spots) in this verse refers to the woman's beauty spots which carry a sexual connotation, examples are: thighs, breasts and back side. At the end of the verse, God tells the women not to strike with their feet to show their 'zeenatahunna'. The way a woman strikes her feet while walking can expose the outlines of certain parts of the body. For a more detailed analysis of 24:31 please go to: Corruption of 24:31 Fourth Rule: Lengthen your outer garments O you prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to lower their outer garments. This is better so that they will be recognized and not harmed. God is Forgiver, Merciful. 33:59 When we reflect on the above words, we would understand the great wisdom of God. In this verse, God, deliberately said that women should lower their outer garments (dress, skirt, jalabiya, etc), but did not say any precise details of how much to lower. God could have said to lower their garments to their ankles or to their mid-calf or to their knees, but He did not. God knows that we will be living in different communities and have different cultures. Thus God left the exact amount of lowering of a woman's dress for women to decide, as long as righteousness is always maintained. Some scholars have claimed that the Quran commands women to cover all their bodies and not just lower their garments, for the details please see: Manipulation of 33:59. Relaxing the Dress Code: Within a family setting, God put no hardship on women, permitting them to relax their dress code. This is apparent from the words of 24:31 (above). In addition, elderly women who no longer expect to get married can also relax their dress code: Regarding the elderly post-menstrual women who no longer seek marriage, there is no blame upon them for relaxing their clothes, provided they do not flaunt their zinat. Indeed, maintaining morality is better for them. God is Hearer, Knowledgeable. 24:60 Reply to those who claim that a Muslim woman should be covered except for her face: Many Muslim scholars have invented extreme rules for women's dress which are not found in the Quran. Some say that women should be totally covered except for their faces, while others who are even more extreme, say that all women must be covered from head to toe except for two holes for the eyes to see. 1- There are no words anywhere in the Quran which command women to cover all their bodies. Those who preach such un-Quranic rules cannot find words in the Quran to justify this extremity, so they manipulate various words in 24:31 and 33:59 to justify the falsehood. 2- The fact that God says in 24:31 to specifically cover the bosom indicates clearly that there are other parts of the woman’s body that do not have to be covered. To elaborate on the indication of the words in 24:31, let us ponder on the following example: Think of your house and in it, you have a garden. You have a gardener who comes to look after your garden. One day you tell the gardener: please water the area under the big tree and also water the back of the garden. What does this example tell us? It tells us that since you specified only areas to be watered, then this is a clear indication that there will be other areas in the garden that are not to be watered. If you wanted the gardener to water the whole garden you would have said: Please water the whole garden. When we apply this example to the issue of women’s dress code in the Quran, the same principle applies. If God wanted the whole body of the woman to be covered, God would not have specified the chest to be covered but would have issued a command for all the body to be covered. But since God specifies certain parts of the woman’s body to be covered, then there are other parts that do not have to be covered, as long as they are not beauty spots of a sexual connotation and as long as righteousness in dress is maintained. 3- The command to "lower their garment" also proves that the woman is not commanded to be covered from head to toe. For if that was the case and women must be covered down to their toes, there would be no meaning to "lower their garments". How can a woman lower a garment that is already down to the ground? What does The Quran say about the burqa? First of all it depends upon who you ask. There is disagreement in Islamic circles as to what extent Quran advocates the wearing of the burqa. However, The Quran does not specifically mention the burqa or tell women to wear such extremely confining clothes. Instead, it instructs men and women to dress and behave modestly in society (24:31), which the Ulama or “Scholars” do agree upon. Modern day Muslims base their authority regarding the burqa on the hadith or collected traditions of life in the days of prophet Muhammad. It is important to note here that these “collected traditions” have no place in Islam, (please see relevant articles on this site). Most followers of these traditions know little of their origins or authenticity. For the thousands of traditions attributed to the Prophet only one bears notable credibility: “Do not write down anything I say except the Quran. Whoever has written something other than Quran let him destroy it.” (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Vol. 1, page 171 also Sahih Muslim, Book 42, Number 7147). With contradiction and confusion thrown up by the hadith and “scholars of Islam” let us consider what the Quran says and which sheds light on the issue of the burqa: [33:52] No women are lawful for you beyond this, nor for you to replace them with other wives even if you are attracted by their beauty, with the exception of what your right hand possesses. You must be content with those already made lawful to you. God is watchful over all things. The significance of the underlined words is that they confirm that God never commanded women to cover their faces. If the Burqa was a command from God, as some claim, then how can any man be attracted to a woman's beauty (as in 33:52)? Naturally the woman's beauty, which God is speaking about, is the beauty of her face. If the Burqa was a command from God then the words in 33:52 would become meaningless and obsolete. Now let us review what the Quran says about the topic of a dress code. For women: Cover your chest (24:31); Lengthen your garments (33:59) and for both sexes; The BEST garment is righteousness and modest conduct (7:26). The word burqa is not to be found anywhere in the Quran, but as it falls under the heading of hijab which is used in Quran we should explore its use. The Arabic word hijab can be translated into veil or yashmak. Other meanings for the word include screen, barrier, cover(ing), mantle, curtain, drapes, partition, division, divider etc. The word hijab appears in the Qur’an seven times, five of them as “hijab” and twice as “hijaban”. See 7:46, 17:45, 19:17, 33:53, 38:32, 41:5, 42:51. None of these “hijab” words are used in the Quran in reference to what the traditional Muslims call today “the dress code for Muslim woman”. Hijab in the Qur’an has nothing to do with a woman’s dress code. [7:46] A hijab (barrier) separates them, while the Purgatory is occupied by people who recognise each side by their looks. They will call the dwellers of Paradise: "Peace be upon you." They did not enter (Paradise) through wishful thinking. [42:51] No human being can communicate with God except through inspiration, or from behind a hijaban (barrier), or by sending a messenger through whom He reveals what He wills. He is the Most High, Most Wise. Another word commonly used to justify the wearing of the burqa or at best a veil is the word khimaar, which can be found, along with the dress code for women in 24:31. Some Muslims quote this verse as a commandment for hijab, or head cover by pointing to the word khumurihinna in 24:31, which simply means cover, forgetting that God has already used the word hijab, several times in the Qur’an. Those blessed by God can see that the use of the word “Khimaar” in this verse is not for hijab, nor for head cover. Those who quote this verse usually add (head cover or veil) after the word Khumurihinna, and usually between parentheses, because it is their addition to the verse of God. Here is the most accurate translation of 24:31. [24:31] And tell the believing women to subdue their eyes, and maintain their chastity. They shall not reveal any parts of their bodies, except that which is apparent. They shall cover their chests with their ‘khimar’. Most of the translators, obviously influenced by the hadith translate the word as VEIL and thus mislead people into believing that this verse is advocating the covering of the head and hair, some even go to the extent of claiming that 24:31 implies the covering of the face! But the truth is that the word khimaar simply means a cover, any cover is called khimaar in Arabic. The derivative word khamrah, which means intoxicants, is so called because it covers the brain. In 24:31, God is telling the women to use their cover (khimaar, being a dress, a coat, a shawl, a shirt, a blouse, a tie, a scarf . . . etc.) to cover their bosoms, not their heads, face or hair. If God willed to order the women to cover their heads, face or hair, He would have simply said, “Cover your head, face and hair.” God is neither vague nor forgetful! God does not run out of words. He does not wait for, nor need a scholar to apply the correct words for Him! God confirms that the Quran is complete and fully detailed (6:114/5). The Arabic word for chest or more accurately the cleavage is jayb and this is the word used in this verse, but the Arabic words for head which is Ra’s, or hair which is sha’r are NOT. The commandment in the verse is clear - Cover your chest. The last part of the verse 24:31 translates as, “They shall not strike their feet when they walk in order to shake and reveal certain details of their bodies”. Details of the body can or cannot be revealed by the dress you wear and not by your head cover. It is a crime that so many men who have coaxed, or pressured, or demanded that their women wear the burqa, or that their daughters wear a hijab prematurely, are most probably unable or unwilling to read the Quran and uphold its tenants, being totally dependent on the interpretations incorrectly preached to them by immoderate clerics and cultural exhortations not based on pure religion. The problem with so many clerics in powerful positions within many Islamic communities around the globe, is that these religious leaders do not allow for intellectual freedom, or personal interpretation when it comes to matters of self assessed modesty and female dressing because of the narrowness in which they view women’s supposedly intemperate sexuality and the lack of self-control in men. Surely in this day and age, human beings can be trusted to walk down the street, safe in the knowledge that a glimpse of hair will not cause a riot. A veil worn in any form should be a personal and independent choice, free of social pressure. A shroud should not be used to effectively excise a woman from the society in which they live and the possibilities of the freedoms we should all enjoy. 2:256 There shall be no compulsion in religion: the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in God has grasped the strongest bond; one that never breaks. God is Hearer, Omniscient. In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here. My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you. But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming. And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today. We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound, and to reform our society. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only. According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave". Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Islamic and Christian Religion are not compatible at all... its like oil and water do not mix at all today. No, it is not compatible. The Qur'an explicitly denies the divinity of Christ, which is one of the absolute bedrock tenets of the Christian faith. Without His divinity and associated sinlessness Christ's sacrifice and resurrection would carry no meaning or effect. One additional note: I ran across this article today and I thought it would round out this answer well. In it the author explains the doctrine of the Trinity and why it matters so much. The fact that Christ was divine and one part of a triune Godhead is critical to Christianity, and as I said the Qur'an denies it outright. A great summary of the Trinity from the article: The doctrine of the Trinity can be summarized in seven statements. (1) There is only one God. (2) The Father is God. (3) The Son is God. (4) The Holy Spirit is God. (5) The Father is not the Son. (6) The Son is the not the Holy Spirit. (7) The Holy Spirit is not the Father. All of the creedal formulations and theological jargon and philosophical apologetics have to do with safeguarding each one of these statements and doing so without denying any of the other six. Without a Trinity there is no Christianity, therein lies the direct conflict with the Qur'an. Capital punishment is permitted in Islamic jurisprudence only under specific legal conditions, such as for crimes like intentional murder (qisas), apostasy, adultery (zina), or banditry (hirabah), and must be carried out by a legitimate judicial authority, not by individuals. The death penalty is not a personal right but a legal sentence within a formal justice system. Even in cases of war or jihad, classical Islamic scholars have prohibited the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and civilians. Some political figures have used inflammatory language, such as calling radical Shi'ite groups a "death cult," but these statements reflect personal opinions and do not represent mainstream Islamic beliefs or the views of the global Muslim community. Similarly, extremist interpretations that justify violence are widely rejected by Islamic scholars and institutions. Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now! They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently. Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence: Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.” Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing. These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression. This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.” Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day. The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam. Quranic verses include: Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…” Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…” Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…” Examples of Hadith include: Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.” Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’” Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it. Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’” Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’” These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion. Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? -https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 202

Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Muhammad Married A 9-Year-Old Lady Ayesha Because Messenger of God Said So - https://rumble.com/v2q351m-muhammad-married-a-9-year-old-lady-ayesha-because-messenger-of-god-said-so.html Is it true that Muhammad married a child bride by the name of Ayesha when he was 53 and she was 9 years old? If so, how do Muslims justify this from their “exemplary” Prophet? The well-established, but not altogether agreed upon, tradition of Lady Ayesha’s age at the time of marrying Prophet Muhammad comes from a hadith in one of the most authentic collections – Sahih al-Bukhari in which Ayesha, herself, states: “The Messenger of God married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.” If I become president of America, the first thing I’m gonna do is find an executive order banning Islam as a terrorist hate group that’s a threat to our national security. Mohammed was a pedophile, and Islam is not a religion. It's a sick cult...one that should be abolished from society. I support everyone’s freedom of religion, but where your beliefs call for punishment, reprisals, and violence, it’s not a religion, it’s a cult. He married her age 6 and had sex, when she was 9. Btw, she was never pregnant and so she didn't have children of her own. I wonder why?!! May be he injured that 9 year old child? they can try to justify it anyway they want, it's pedophilia in every way you look at, they're sick demented people today. He got a revelation I agree 100%. He got that revelation from Satan himself. He was a pedophilia and yes the parents are guilty as well. They’re all process from the devil. He was so much a good man that he waited till she was 9 years old. Btw (by the way) he was the only prophet who has no prophecy fulfill. You no nothing about woman. Why did your prophet had to ask weather the voice he heard was from God or Satan. A Secrets Planning For Killing All The Jews And LGBTQIA+ Peoples Of New York City In 2026 Flames of Change The New Year’s For Phoenix Rising Out Of The Ash For Death To America Ceremony July 04, 2026 250nd Year Of Independence. People's Republic Of United States Of Americastan Declared Its An Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All Good Or Bad Or Who Care ? Be-Headings, Homeless, Drug, Death, Rape, Sex Slaves, Sex Workers And Child Pedophile's All Types of Grenades Explained Etc. Zohran Mamdani's Victory Speech 11/04-2025 Now Confirmed Everything We Feared About...? Yes Close To One Million Muslims Already Living In NYC Right Now. And Planning To Move In 2 Million More Muslims By Dec. 31, 2026... As Millions Of Jews, Transgender And Whites Persons Start Moving Out Fast With There Money. Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's A Republic Of New York City-State And Is Now Under Islamic And Sharia Laws A Democratic Control Socialist Communist Country... Soon To Be Muslim Hell Hole As Planned For Americastan And We Now Have The Right To Kill You Under Islamic Law And Sharia Laws Today. So New York City-State 11/04/2025 Is Now A New Country Called We The Non-White Citizen's Of The People's Republic Of Americastan 2026. Remember This Channel Is Information Only And Is Not About Fear Porn At All... So "Open Your Eyes Before You Die" In 2026... So Why Is Millions Of Muslim Praying On The NYC Sidewalk Permissible In Islam? It’s A Public Statement Of Force And The Large Number Our To Intimidate The Non-Muslims Peoples Of America U.S.A. With Fear Today. So This Why We Think Praying On Sidewalks Is Wrong And Disliked So Much Today? When Is Praying on the Sidewalk Allowed And Why In The First Place? What No One Ever Told You About Muslim Women And Need To Know Shocking Hidden Facts -https://rumble.com/v716kya-what-no-one-ever-told-you-about-muslim-women-and-need-to-know-shocking-hidd.html Statue Of Liberty Is Now Wears A Burqa After Zohran Mamdani Win In NYC... But Per The Islamic Center of Americais a prominent mosque located in Dearborn, Michigan, serving as the largest mosque in North America and the oldest purpose-built Shia mosque in the United States. Per Islamic Laws About Idols Statue Of Liberty Must Be-Removed In NYC Now... Islam prescribes that idols should be destroyed and smashed, not made and repaired. Yes So Let's Replace It With A New Islamic Liberty Mosque In 2026. “The Statue Of Liberty Was Born A Muslim!” yelled activist Linda Sarsour, at a rally in New York City on Sunday, January 29th. The statement sent murmurs through the crowd of over 10,000 people who’d gathered in Battery Park, within view of the the statue, to protest Donald Trump’s executive order restricting entry to the United States for citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries. But was there any truth to it? https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-disputed-story-statue-libertys-muslim-heritage Lady Liberty’s stance, mid-step, “has been interpreted to indicate that liberty can’t stand still she has to keep moving, be dynamic, and change with the times,” Simonelli explains. “Over time, you have to come up with new laws and new ways of preserving and expanding liberty.” As the rallies supporting the freedoms of Americans spread across the country, this notion and the many facets of freedom that the monument has stood for since its inception find new urgency. So This Is How It Work... We Now Have 2 Million Muslims Living In New York City Very Soon In 2026. We Will Line The Street Of NYC Pride Events...Yes With Tens Of Thousands Guns & Knife & Hand Grenades Of All Types (Death To America ?) You Know... Guns Left To Us By President Joe Biden As Planned Per Agenda U.N. 21 and Agenda 2030 Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order Administration. (This May Help The Homeless In NYC With New 500,000+ Open Home For Rent In 2026). Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? New York City Pride 2026 events will take place from Wednesday, June 24, 2026, to Monday, June 29, 2026, with the main activities concentrated over the final weekend of June. The centerpiece of the celebration is the NYC Pride March, which will occur on Sunday, June 28, 2026, starting at 11:00 AM from 26th Street and Fifth Avenue, proceeding south along Fifth Avenue, west along 8th Street to Christopher Street, and ending at 15th Street and 7th Avenue. https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The group's public executions of gay men are part of a deliberate moral policing campaign, one aimed at showing supporters and enemies alike that it means to enforce its narrow, atavistic view of Islamic law wherever it can. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/islamic-states-views-homosexuality The main method used to kill these men has been to throw them off the roofs of high-rise buildings, based on a hadith in which the Prophet's successor, Abu Bakr, prescribes throwing a man off a cliff for engaging in homosexual acts. In other cases, victims were stoned, beheaded, or shot instead. Also We Muslim Are Planning To Get 10 Thousand New Police Jobs... As the NYPD has said that 8,600+ officers that are gonna be resigning, effective Jan. 1, 2026. Also In July 2026 This Is How It Work... We Now Have 2 Million Muslims Living In New York City Very Soon In 2026. So Across All Of NYC Jews Homes And All Jews Business... Will Be Attacked At The Same Time All Over NYC At Noon 12PM By The Islamic State With Tens Of Thousands Guns & Knife & Hand Grenades Of All Types. The New Muslim NYPD will not help you them. Also European officials are ‘deeply concerned’ for Muslims amid surge in attacks... at the same time all over the world as America and other Representatives from 10 European countries sign statement warning of rising hate crimes against Muslims and Jews for the U.S.A. July 04, 2026? 250th 1776-2026 Party's. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Yes This Is How Sick America Is Today ?... It's Pornhub right now sees approximately 3.5 billion monthly visits, translating to roughly 115 million daily users on average, according to recent statistics from 2024–2025. Parents Beware Internet Porn Cartoon Funny Starting Conversation With Your Kids -https://rumble.com/v2cehi2-parents-beware-internet-porn-cartoon-funny-starting-conversation-with-your-.html Pedophile's Run School Board Meeting About LGBTQ XXX Books in School Libraries -https://rumble.com/v2p5mds-pedophiles-run-school-board-meeting-about-lgbtq-xxx-books-in-school-librari.html Most Bizarre Sexual Deviations In The World Of Pedophile's Politicians And Celebrities -https://rumble.com/v2qly46-most-bizarre-sexual-deviations-in-the-world-of-pedophiles-politicians-and-c.html Sexual Disorder is a type of Personality Disorder that may be further divided into Sexual Dysfunction and Sexual Deviations. In Sexual Dysfunction there is a reduction or total loss of sexual capacity, which includes frigidity in females, and premature ejaculation and impotence in males. Sexual Deviation involves sexual interest directed primarily towards objects other than people of the opposite sex, towards objects not usually associated with sexual intercourse, or towards sexual intercourse performed under bizarre circumstances. This video lists and describes the 10 most bizarre Sexual Deviations in the world. TIMESTAMPS:-0:00Ten Bizarre Sexual Deviations -0:29Beastiality -1:11Exhibitionism -1:46Fetishism -2:11Homosexuality -2:51Incest -3:42Masochism and Sadism -4:19Pedophilia -4:46Transvestism -5:28Voyeurism All Hunter Biden Sex Crime Report On My Laptop Missing 100s Prostitutes Body's -https://rumble.com/v4hir8u-all-hunter-biden-sex-crime-report-on-my-laptop-missing-100s-prostitutes-bod.html All Hunter Biden Sex Crime Report On My Laptop Missing 100s Missing Or Dead Prostitutes Body Etc. Truth About Islam Laws In USA Tobacco, Coffee, And Alcohol Death Penalty For Violations. Adultery - Death penalty, stoning, lashing, banishment, or amputation of hand Alcohol - Death penalty Apostasy from Islam - Death penalty Coffee - Death penalty Murder - Death penalty, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Highway robbery - Execution, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Homosexuality - Death penalty Masturbation - Amputation of hand used Publishing pornography - Death penalty Rape- Death penalty Theft - Amputation of the right hand Smoking tobacco - Death penalty Witchcraft - Death penalty Robbing a caravans - Death penalty... But After Muhammad received intelligence about the Caravan's route, Muhammad ordered Zayd ibn Haritha to go after the Caravan, and they successfully raided is a Islamic military actions only. Muslim men may have only 4 wife at one time... But only Prophet Muhammad have sex with 9 women at one time ? According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. Scholars have stated that it is obligatory (wajib) for a female slave to submit to her master for sexual intimacy, and it is considered haram (forbidden) for her to refuse without a valid excuse. Refusal without a valid reason is described as disobedience, and the master is permitted to discipline her in a manner deemed appropriate by Shariah, including non-physical forms of correction such as verbal reprimand or deprivation of privileges. In some interpretations, if a slave refuses without a valid reason, her master may even be permitted to force her, although this is subject to the limits of permissible punishment. However, there are differing views on the matter. Some scholars argue that consent is not legally required because a slave is considered to have no agency and is not permitted to refuse her master's demands. Others, citing hadiths and ethical considerations, suggest that while the legal requirement may not demand consent, it is ethically desirable to seek the slave's approval, and that forcing her could cause harm, which is prohibited in Islam. For instance, Imam al-Haleemi is reported to have stated that if a slave woman dislikes being touched or having intercourse, her master should not do so without her permission. It is also important to note that a woman who was married before being enslaved is considered to have her previous marriage annulled upon enslavement, making her available for her master's sexual relations. However, if she was married after being enslaved, or if her marriage was not annulled, then her master cannot have intercourse with her, as she is considered married to another man. Furthermore, sexual relations are not permitted with polytheist or Zoroastrian slaves; conversion to Islam, Judaism, or Christianity is required, though the method and necessity of conversion are debated among scholars. Masturbation Is Forbidden An Prohibition - {And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts). Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, - for them, they are free from blame. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors.}(Al-Muminun 23:5-7). In summary, Islamic jurisprudence, as reflected in the provided sources, permits sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under the condition of lawful ownership, with the slave's previous marriage being nullified, and with the master's right to intimacy being considered a legal and religiously sanctioned benefit. Terror Slavery Chronicles & Other Woman Escapes Sexual Slavery Auction - https://rumble.com/v2d58c4-terror-slavery-chronicles-and-other-woman-escapes-sexual-slavery-auction-gr.html Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: It is not permissible for a man to have intercourse with anyone except his wife or his female slave (concubine). A wife becomes permissible after shar’i marriage and a concubine becomes permissible to the man who owns her. She may originally be a prisoner of war, and a Muslim may obtain a concubine from the ruler or commander if he took part in fighting in jihad, or if he buys her from her owner. She becomes permissible for him by virtue of his ownership after it is established that she is not pregnant by waiting for one menstrual cycle, or until she has given birth if she is pregnant. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts) 6. Except from their wives or (the slaves) that their right hands possess, ـــ for then, they are free from blame” [al-Mu’minoon 23:5-6] It was narrated that Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, concerning the prisoners of Awtaas: “Do not have intercourse with a pregnant woman until she gives birth, or with one who is not pregnant until she has menstruated once.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2157. This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albani in Irwa’ al-Ghaleel, 187. In the answer to question no. 10382 we have stated that Islam permits a man to have intercourse with his slave woman whether he has one or more wives or he is not married. In the answers to questions no. 5707 and 12562 it states that female prisoners of war may be distributed by the commander in jihad, because he has the choice of either distributing them, or ransoming them or setting them free. Sultan Murad IV of the Ottoman Empire closed coffeehouses and outlawed tobacco smoking, imposing the death penalty for violations. He viewed coffeehouses as centers of sedition where political dissent and conspiracy could flourish, particularly due to their association with the Janissaries, a military group that had previously deposed his brother and uncle, fueling his fear of rebellion. Yes he banned tobacco, coffee, and alcohol, enforcing the ban with extreme measures, including the execution of violators or suspected offenders. His enforcement was so severe that he personally patrolled the streets of Constantinople, disguised, to catch and execute those consuming coffee or smoking tobacco. The Bible Prescribes The Death Penalty For Other Evil Activities Same As Us Muslim Such As: Murder (Exo 21:12,14, Lev 24:17,21) Harming pregnant woman (Exo 21:22,23) Sorcery (Exo 22:18) Bestiality (Exo 22:19, Lev 20:15,16) Homosexuality (Lev 20:13) Blaspheming the name of the Lord (Lev 24:16) Worshipping false gods (Deu 13:6-10) Prostitution (Deu 22:24) and others. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Muslim women's can not work and all women are on Welfare and food stamps. What things are not allowed for women in Islam? Is not allowed by Islamic Law for A Woman to marry a non-Muslim man ever. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Then, a woman must obey him at all time. Muslim women's can not drive a car ever and can not open a bank acct. ever. Physical interaction between a man and a woman is not permitted in Islam. Islam does not allow women any kind of eye contact ever with anyone. Wearing strict and cleavage clothing with eyes and hand open only. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 A-Bomb How Powerful Are UK Nuclear Weapons - https://rumble.com/v71r52y-so-london-has-fallen-muslims-have-taken-over-8-a-bomb-how-powerful-are-uk-n.html So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 Atomic Bomb How Powerful Are The New Isis Muslims Are Now Running UK Nuclear Weapons Program? So London Has Fallen To Ten Million Muslims And The Islamic State Have Now Taken Over One Of UK Nuclear Powered Submarine With 8 A-Bomb On Board It And How Powerful Are UK Lost Of 8 Nuclear Weapons Now In Hands Of Millions Muslims Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws In 2026. Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v70xlx2-truth-about-muslim-death-cult-of-americastan-and-right-to-kill-you-under-is.html Truth Yes I'm Not Here To Offend Anyone Here, But Is It True That Muslims Are Told To Kill Other Religions? Its Not At All About "Islamophobia" As A Phrase Is Such A Complete Statement Today. Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. Islam, as a religion, does it promote a death cults and does it do or grant individuals a general right to kill under Islamic or Sharia law. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Yes It’s Happening Right Now New York City Starting January 02, 2026 As Your New Mayer Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. Muslim Zohran Mamdani Said This Video Is Like America Sheep Today: America Stuck On An Escalator Do They Live Or Die Wake Up Go After Your Dreams - https://rumble.com/v44jlzf-america-stuck-on-an-escalator-do-they-live-or-die-wake-up-go-after-your-dre.html And This Also Is America Today: Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits A Truly Disgusting Sex Laugh-In - https://rumble.com/v4b4tee-gilbert-gottfried-loves-jeanne-friends-with-benefits-a-truly-disgusting-sex.html Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits So We The Sheeple People Of U.S.A. ? But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. The ten most terrifying words in the English language are: (I'm from the your Government, and I'm here to help you). ha ha... Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers -https://rumble.com/v5bsc6b-want-to-stop-drunk-driver-from-killing-sober-drivers-its-easy-ban-sober-dri.html American Gun Control And The Right To Self Defense Is Over (Death To America). Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers That's How Gun Control Works Want to stop drunk driver from killing sober drivers ? its easy ban sober drivers that's how gun control works. You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. Muslims, for a really long time in this country, have been told that there is a privilege, that there is a privilege that we are given, and it might be taken away. We are told that we should be appropriate, we should go to school, get an education, raise our children and not bother anyone, not make any kind of noise. Don’t make anyone uncomfortable be a good Muslim. But no matter how much we have tried to be the best neighbor, people have always worked on finding a way to not allow for every single civil liberty to be extended to us. Islamic and Christian Religion are not compatible at all... its like oil and water do not mix at all today. No, it is not compatible. The Qur'an explicitly denies the divinity of Christ, which is one of the absolute bedrock tenets of the Christian faith. Without His divinity and associated sinlessness Christ's sacrifice and resurrection would carry no meaning or effect. One additional note: I thought it would round out this answer well. In it the author explains the doctrine of the Trinity and why it matters so much. The fact that Christ was divine and one part of a triune Godhead is critical to Christianity, and as I said the Qur'an denies it outright. A great summary of the Trinity from the article: The doctrine of the Trinity can be summarized in seven statements. (1) There is only one God. (2) The Father is God. (3) The Son is God. (4) The Holy Spirit is God. (5) The Father is not the Son. (6) The Son is the not the Holy Spirit. (7) The Holy Spirit is not the Father. All of the creedal formulations and theological jargon and philosophical apologetics have to do with safeguarding each one of these statements and doing so without denying any of the other six. Without a Trinity there is no Christianity, therein lies the direct conflict with the Qur'an. Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia In America - https://rumble.com/v45yg7z-rep.-ilhan-omar-say-72-american-muslims-want-to-see-establish-sharia-in-ame.html Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia Law In America For The People & By The People Slavery & Rape & Be-Heading Is All Part Islamic Law For All Peoples And All Colour Of People Alive Today. Yes Its Called Freedom Of Religion With "One Nation Under Allah". Do Muslims Believe Sharia Law Supersedes The Constitution? The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It prohibits Congress from promoting one religion over others and restricting an individual's religious practices. It also guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Free speech is a cherished value in the United States and is protected by the First Amendment. Capital punishment is permitted in Islamic jurisprudence only under specific legal conditions, such as for crimes like intentional murder (qisas), apostasy, adultery (zina), or banditry (hirabah), and must be carried out by a legitimate judicial authority, not by individuals. The death penalty is not a personal right but a legal sentence within a formal justice system. Even in cases of war or jihad, classical Islamic scholars have prohibited the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and civilians. Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages - https://rumble.com/v3pc2vu-both-side-issues-exposed-islamic-state-clerics-secret-sex-trade-pleasure-ma.html Some political figures have used inflammatory language, such as calling radical Shi'ite groups a "death cult," but these statements reflect personal opinions and do not represent mainstream Islamic beliefs or the views of the global Muslim community. Similarly, extremist interpretations that justify violence are widely rejected by Islamic scholars and institutions. In summary, Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. The misuse of religious texts to justify violence is condemned by mainstream Islamic scholarship, and the legal mechanisms for capital punishment are strictly regulated and judicial in nature. Male to Female Sex Reassignment Surgery Live ** Very Graphic ** Think Twice Guys ? -https://rumble.com/v2hpw3e-male-to-female-sex-reassignment-surgery-live-very-graphic-think-twice-guys-.html WoW This Looks Fun Lady's Keyhole Top Surgery For Female to Male Transgender --https://rumble.com/v2zsoao-wow-this-looks-fun-ladys-keyhole-top-surgery-for-female-to-male-transgender.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of America All Female Most Get Clitoris Removal Per Quran? -https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). In this text Ayatullah Dastghaib has exhaustively explained the phenomenon of sin, the classification of sins, the necessity of avoiding them, He has described fifty different types of Greater Sins such as: association with God (Shirk), fornication, drinking alcohol, gambling, disrespect towards parents and cutting ties with relatives. Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Our sins strike him like arrows. When he examines the scrolls of our deeds, He weeps at our sins. We dedicate the book To this same Infallible Personality. May Allah hasten his Reappearance. Translator’s Preface In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate the Merciful Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds and benedictions upon the Messenger of Allah and his Purified Progeny (‘a) By the Grace of the Almighty, the first volume of “Greater Sins” has been completed in English. The significance of Moral Science and Ethics is evident from the words of the Messenger of Allah (S) when he has described the aim of his advent. He said, “I have been sent for perfecting the morals.” The learned Alim, Ayatullah Dastghaib was one of the greatest Muallim ul-Akhlaq (Teacher of Moral Science). Some of his important books are Gunahane Kabira, Qalbe Salim, Ma’ad, Barzakh etc. His books cover various moral and ethical issues. The book Gunahane Kabira deals with Greater Sins. Ayatullah Dastghaib has exhaustively explained the phenomenon of sin, the classification of sins, and the necessity of avoiding them. He has also described fifty different types of Greater Sins. Although the English translation is based on the Urdu Edition, I have relied upon the original Arabic text while translating traditions and Qur’anic verses. Since the English equivalents of Islamic terminology do not convey the exact meaning, I have used the Arabic terms. However those who are not conversant with Arabic words may refer to the Glossary of Islamic Terms. Wassalam. Sayyid Athar Husain S.H.Rizvi The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? A Short Biography Of Ayatullah Dastaghaib Shirazi Martyr Ayatullah Abul-Husayn Dastghaib Shirazi was a nobleman from a highly religious family that was known for its intellectual heritage going back to 800 years. Due to religious and spiritual atmosphere, resulting from such a sound Islamic background he had a natural and spontaneous tendency towards acquiring knowledge. After obtaining elmentary education in his hometown, he moved towards Najaf al-Ashraf (Iraq) in pursuit of higher knowledge. In the town of the abode of the Chief of the believers, ‘Ali Ibn Abi Talib (‘a), he continued his studies associating with the various scholars and teachers. Soon his knowledge reached a stage such that, he was granted permission by the Maraja of that time to practise Ijtehad. He then returned to his native town of Shiraz. In Shiraz he spent thousands of tumans for the construction of the Jame Masjid Ateq which was in a highly dilapidated condition. There, he began to lecture on the exegesis of the Qur’an and ethics. His persistent efforts raised the standard of education of the Hauz al-Ilmia of Shiraz in the various fields of Fiqh, Beliefs and Moral science. The irreligious and tyrannical Shah imposed restrictions upon him and he was arrested many times. He was also put under house arrest by the autocratic ruler. After the success of the Islamic revolution, he was elected a representative at the Majlis (Iranian Parliament). At the instance of the people of Shiraz he was designated as the representative of Imam Khomeini. The post of Imam of Jame Masjid of Shiraz was also bestowed upon him. Martyr Dastghaib has left behind innumerable works. The most remarkable of these are: Gunahane Kabira (Greater Sins), Qalb al-Salim, Salatal Khashain, Ma’ad, at-Tawba, Zindagani al-Hazrat Zahra and Zainab al-Kubra. Apart from these he has penned dozens of books on the improvement of morals, Fiqh and the exegesis of Qur’an. Hence, he was an excellent model of spirituality with a lofty character and a loving nature. On that fateful day (in the year 1984) as he was proceeding to lead the Friday congregation, he was brutally killed in a bomb explosion by the hypocrites (the Capitalist agents). 00Taqwa https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/taqwa The Reality Of Taqwa Sin Obliterates The Good Deeds The Importance Of Abstaining From The Prohibited First Tradition Second Tradition Third Tradition Fourth Tradition Fifth Tradition Ill-Gotten Wealth Burns Down The Acts Of Worship Sixth Tradition Not Giving The Rights Of The People: A Barrier For The Acceptance Of Good Deeds Seventh Tradition Eighth Tradition Good Deeds Are Accepted Only If Accompanied By Piety Ninth Tradition Sin Is A Barrier To The Acceptance Of Invocation (Du’a) Tenth Tradition Refraining From Sins Is Genuine Worship Eleventh Tradition Avoidance Of Sins Is A Must Good Actions Could Be Blown Away Like Dust A Large Number Of Pious People Will Enter Paradise 0. Greater Sins And Smaller Sins https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/greater-sins-and-smaller-sins Abstaining From The Greater Sins Cause The Lesser Sins To Be Overlooked The Gates Of Paradise Are Open For The Pious Intercession Intercession Should Not Prompt One To Commit Sins Suicide In The Hope Of Salvation Death Is Of Three Types I Am Concerned About You Regarding Barzakh Tears Of Blood No Intercession For Those Who Regard Salat Unimportant Excessive Sins Destroy The Faith (Belief) Sins Blacken The Heart The Blackened Heart Is Immune To Advice And Counsel To Be Fearful Of The Past Sins Intercession Should Neither Raise False Hope, Nor Be A Cause To Be Arrogant The Fear And Dread Of Sins Is Still Necessary The Shi’as Of Ahl ul-Bayt (‘A) Shi’a And Mohib The True Shi’as Are Those Who Follow (Obey) The Imams (‘A) Conversation Of ‘Ali (‘A) With Some Shi’as Mere Claim Is Not Sufficient Wilayat The Meaning Of Wilayat Wilayat Of ‘Ali (‘A) Is A Strong Fort Of Allah (S.W.T.) Verbal Claim Unaccompanied By Actions Is Insufficient Success Is Through Actions Alone Types Of Taqwa According To Allama Majlisi Love Love Makes A Man Steadfast The Testimony Of Jabir Ibn Abdullah al-Ansari (R.A.) The Angels Seek Forgiveness For The Partisans Of ‘Ali (‘A) Devotion For ‘Ali (‘A) Consumes Our Sins Difficulties And Calamities Nullify The Sins The Rewards Are Proportionate To The Intensity Of Love Evil Desires Are A Barrier To Devotion A Persian Saying Do Not Use The Bounties For Committing Sins The Gloom Of Sins And The Glow Of Repentance Greater Sin And Lesser Sin What Is A Greater Sin? First Tradition Second Tradition Third Tradition Fourth Tradition A Difficult Problem And Its Solution Reply To The First Objection To Persist In Lesser Sins Is Equivalent To Committing A Greater Sin Deprived Of Divine Rewards (Tawab) It Is Necessary To Refer To The Holy Ahl Ul-Bayt (‘A) How The Ahl Ul-Bayt (‘A) Are The People Of Remembrance (Ahl ‘Ul-Dhikr) Reply To The Second Objection Some Of The Greater Sins Are Included In Others 1. First Greater Sin: Shirk (Polytheism) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/first-greater-sin-shirk-polytheism Shirk - Polytheism Tawhid In The Essence Of Allah (S.W.T.) Christians Are Polytheists Too Idol Worship Is Polytheism Tawhid In The Attributes Of Allah (S.W.T.) All The Good Qualities Of The Creatures Are From The Creator (Allah (S.W.T.)) Praising Ourselves Unknowingly The Pious Ones Dread Praise There Is No Partner In The Divine Attributes Explanations A Saying Of The Holy Prophet (S) Qarun Became A Polythiest Tawhid And Shirk In Acts Of Allah (S.W.T.) Myriad Colours From Colourless Water Who Splits The Ovum And The Seed? In Three Darknesses Nutritious Milk From Dirty Blood Bestows Sustenance: Accepts Deeds Allah (S.W.T.) Is The Cause Of Every Phenomenon No Limit To The Splendour Of Allah (S.W.T.)’S Might Human Strength Human Strength Is Limited By Divine Will Fear Of Allah (S.W.T.) Reliance Upon Allah (S.W.T.) Thankfulness To The Provider Of Bounties Thankfulness For Capability (Or Means) Is Also Necessary Hidden Shirk In The Praise Of The Creature Hazrat Imam Ja’far Al-Sadiq (‘A) And The Thankful Beggar Tawhid And Tawakkul (Reliance) Tawhid And Acceptance (Taslim) Tawhid And Love Tawhid And Shirk In Obedience Authorities Whose Obedience Is Commanded By Allah (S.W.T.) Who Are The “Uli’ L-’Amr”? Love Of ‘Ali (‘A) Commanded By Allah (S.W.T.), And Muawiya’s Stance The Term ‘Uli’ l-’Amr’ Is Not Restricted To A Particular Group Are The Religious Scholars Uli’ l-’Amr? The Twelve Imams Are Uli’ l-’Amr What The Holy Prophet (S) Says Regarding Uli’ l-’Amr Obedience Of The Just Mujtahid The Faqih Who Deserves To Be Followed Obeying Parents Is Obeying Allah (S.W.T.) Parents Cannot Restrain From Obligatory Acts Nor Can They Compel You To Commit The Prohibited Further Details Regarding Obedience To Parents Obedience Of The Husband Is Wajib Upon The Wife Dignity In The Marital Affairs Non-Essential Expenses Should Have The Prior Sanction Of The Husband Referring To The Unjust Ruler Is Not Allowed The Religious Scholar Who Does Not Practise Piety Is Not To Be Followed Religious Leaders Who Worship The World Are Bandits On The Highway To Allah (S.W.T.) A Faqih Should Only Be For Allah (S.W.T.) The Common People Are ‘Deficient’ Tawhid And Shirk In Worship The Lord Of The Worlds And The Lowly Man Purity Of Intention One Who “Shows-Off” Is A Mushrik Outward Piety (Riyah) Is The Lesser Shirk The Deceitful Person Deceives Himself Alone The Fire Of Hell Weeps Due To The Deceitful Ones (Riyakar) Sometimes Worship Leads The Worshipper To The Fire (Of Hell) The Merits Of Pure Intentions And The Censure Of Riyah True Deeds Are Surely Manifested Outward Piety And The Legal Point Of View Riyah In The Acts Of Worship Bodily Riyah 2) Riyah Of Beauty And Dress 3) Riyah Of Speech 4) Riyah Of Actions 5) Riyah Of The External Kind Riyah Is Associated With Intention 2. Second Greater Sin: Yas (Deaspair) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/second-greater-sin-yas-deaspair Despair The Greatest Sin After ‘Shirk’ Cause Is Not Independent First Example: Fire Did Not Burn: Knife Did Not Cut Second Example: Musa (‘A) And Fir’on Third Example:The Attack Of Abraha On The Ka’ba Fourth Example: The Holy Prophet (S) And How His Life Was Saved Fifth Example: He Creates Without An Apparent Cause The Holy Prophet (S) And His Knowledge Invocations Are Answered Without The Presence Of Apparent Means Love Of ‘Ali (‘A) The Destiny Of Man Balam Baur And His Eternal Damnation A Warning Beauty of the Hereafter The Magicians Of Fir’on Asiya Was A Believing Woman People Of The Cave Realization Before Death Immediate Death On Embracing Islam Eternal Bliss Wise People Never Lose Hope Hopelessness Is A Great Sin Hopelessness Is A Sign Of Disbelief And Lack Of Knowledge Hope Is Embedded In Human Psychology The Cure Of Hopelessness 1. Power Of Allah (S.W.T.) 2. Personal Experiences 3.Outward Examples Hazrat Ibrahim (‘A) And His Male Child Hazrat Zakaria (‘A) And His Son Yahya (‘A) Hazrat Ayyub (‘A) And Tribulations Hidden Wisdom In Poverty And Destitution Wealth In The Empty Hands Cure For Hopelessness In Difficult Times A Reminder Every Sin Is Pardonable Unlimited Grace Hopelessness Is Haram Repentance Of The Killer Of A Prophet Is Also Acceptable Despair In The Acceptance Of Prayers Is Also Improper Prayers May Not Be Accepted Due To Sins Delay In The Acceptance Of Prayers Causes Nearness To Allah (S.W.T.) 3. Third Greater Sin: Qunut (Despondence) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/third-greater-sin-qunut-despondence Hopelessness In Du’a Is Yas Skepticism Invites Punishment Hope For Forgiveness And The Acceptance Of Du’a Hopelessness In The Affairs Of This World And The Hereafter Qunut Is Worse Than Yas 4. Fourth Greater Sin: Al-Amno Min Makrillah (Disregard Of Allah (S.W.T.)’S Punishment) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fourth-greater-sin-al-amno-min-makrillah Heedlessness To Allah (S.W.T.)’S Anger And Retribution ‘Imla’, Respite Respite For The Wrong Doers Istidraj (Drawing Near) Istidraj Denotes Failure To Repent Fearlessness Of Allah (S.W.T.)’S Plan Fear And Hope Are The Signs Of Marefat Speech And Action Should Be Guarded By Divine Fear And Hope One Must Fear The Acceptance Of His Prayers Separation Is The Most Painful Experience How Should We Remain Till The End Of Our Lives Everyone Shall Be Tested Hazrat Ibrahim (‘A) And The Fire Successful When Tested Tawfiq Is From Allah (S.W.T.) Wise People Fear Allah (S.W.T.) The Prophet’s (S) Conversation With Umm Salama The Prophets (‘A) And The Imams (‘A) Were The Most Fearful A Believer Lives Between Fear And Hope Hope Should Not Cause Arrogance Action Of Man Depicts Hope And Fear A Lesson Between Two Fears One Must Strive For The Hereafter Claim Must Be Substantiated By Action Fear Allah (S.W.T.) As If You Can See Him The Perfect Example The Personality Of ‘Ali (A.S) Is A Model For Us An Excerpt From The Will Of ‘Ali (‘A) We Shall Follow ‘Ali (A.S) Warning Of The Leader The Chief Of The Caravan Is Terror-Stricken Insulting A Believer Expels One From Wilayat 5. Fifth Greater Sin: Murder https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fifth-greater-sin-murder Murder Permanent Chastisement Is Exclusively For Unbelievers The Life And Property Of A Muslim Are Protected One Murder Is Equal To The Killing The Whole Of Humanity Suicide Is Murder Enlivening The People A Murderer Does Not Die A Muslim One Who Instigates A Murder Is The Actual Killer Abortion Is Haram To Abort A Foetus Intentionally Is Haram Repenting For Murder Accidental And Intended Murder How To Kill Your Baby Abortion Procedures 1st, 2nd, And 3rd Trimesters & Other Great Baby Recipes -https://rumble.com/v6xigpw-how-to-kill-you-baby-abortion-procedures-1st-2nd-and-3rd-trimesters-and-oth.html New Mandate Law To Force All U.S.A. Female To Get Sex Genital Mutilation Survivors -https://rumble.com/v2hjog8-new-mandate-law-to-force-all-u.s.a.-female-to-get-sex-genital-mutilation-su.html 6. Sixth Greater Sin: ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn (Disobedience To Parents) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/sixth-greater-sin-aqq-al-walidayn Those Who Are Disobedient To Their Parents Tradition Regarding ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn Is Not Eligible For Divine Forgiveness Prayer Is Not Accepted A Young Man Is Interceeded By The Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) What Is ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn? Benevolence To Parents Is Wajib Service To Parents Is Better Than Jihad Goodness To Parents Is The Expiation Of Sins Satisfaction Of Parents Is Satisfaction Of Allah (S.W.T.) Angels Pray For Those Who Do Good To Their Parents The Material Effects Of ‘Aqq ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn Cause Poverty And Misfortune Evil Consequences Of ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn Prayers Of The Parents Are Accepted Soon The Mother Has More Rights Than The Father Rights Of The Parents A Young Man And His Invalid Mother Be Good To Parents Even If They Are Kafirs Du’a For Sunni Parents Mu’mins And Kafirs Are Equal Under Three Circumstances Advice Of Imam As-Sadiq (‘A) To Zakaria Ibn Ibrahim Rights Of Parents After Their Death The Disobedient Children After The Death Of Their Parents Single Action, Multiple Rewards Praying (Du’a) For The Parents And Seeking Forgiveness On Their Belief When Is Obedience To The Parents Wajib? Disagreement Among The Parents Permission Of The Parents Is Necessary Journey Of The Child And The Martyr’s Viewpoint Refraining From Salat Al-Jama’a Respect For Parents Rights Of The Children Upon Their Parents Maintenance Of Children Arranging The Marriage Religious Education And Training Love And Affection For The Children Kissing The Children Daughters Are More Deserving Of Kindness Spiritual Fathers Are More Qualified For Kindness High Rewards And More Punishment The ‘Uquq Of Spiritual Fathers 7. Seventh Greater Sin: Qat’a Ar-Rahm https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/seventh-greater-sin-qata-ar-rahm Breaking Up Relations The Denouncement Of “Cutting Off Kinship Ties” In The Traditions The Worst Deed In The Eyes Of Allah (S.W.T.) Goodness In Return Of Ill-Treatment Life Is Shortened Death Due To Qat’a Ar-Rahm Bereft Of Divine Mercy Kindness To Relatives Is Obligatory Kindness To Relatives Is Commanded In The Same Way As Salat And Zakat Rights Of The Relatives And The Ease In Reckoning The Inimical Relative Of Imam Ja’far As-Sadiq (‘A) Traditions Regarding Kindness To Relatives One Who Is Kind To The Relatives Will Be Able To Cross The Bridge Of Sirat Smoothly The Worldly Benefits Of Kindness To Relatives ‘Silat Ar-Rahm’ Prolongs Life The Benefits Of Silat Ar-Rahm In The Hereafter Silat Ar-Rahm Causes All The Good Deeds To Be Accepted Extending Hand Of Friendship Towards Those Who Want To Break The Ties (Qat’a Ar-Rahm) The Reward Of Silat Ar-Rahm The Meaning Of Silat Ar-Rahm And Qat’a Ar-Rahm No Discrimination Between The Affluent And The Poor Relatives What Is Silat Ar-Rahm? The Different Grades Of Silat Ar-Rahm The Difference Between Breaking Relations With Nearest Kin And With Distant Relatives Arrogance Towards Poor Relatives Is Qat’a Ar-Rahm What Is The Least Amount Of Silat Ar-Rahm That Is Wajib Silat Ar-Rahm With Certain Relatives Is Mustahab If Not Wajib Breaking Ties Even With Those Who Wish To Break Up Ties With Us Is Haram The Order Of Imam Ja’far As-Sadiq (‘A) Regarding Qat’a Ar-Rahm Goodness In Return Of Ill-Treatment Breaking Of Ties With The Muslim And The Kafir Relatives Dawud Raqqi The Companion Of The Sixth Imam (‘A) The Behaviour Of Imam As-Sadiq (‘A) Towards His Inimical Relatives Conversation Of Imam As-Sadiq (‘A) With Abdullah Hasani The Grief Of Imam Ja’far As-Sadiq (‘A) On The Oppression Upon The Descendants Of Imam al-Hasan (‘A) It Does Not Matter If We Are Kind To Certain Relatives Who Are Not Muslim Silat Ar-Rahm To Kafir Relatives Should Not Encourage Them In Their Disbelief Dissociating With The Enemies Of Islam Silat Ar-Rahm Is Wajib If The Relative Is Not Overtly Inimical Silat Ar-Rahm Is Wajib Even If One Has To Travel Far To Perform It Maintain Cordial Relations But Do Not Reside Close To Each Other Silat Ar-Rahm With The Spiritual Father The Advent Of The Holy Prophet (S) - A Fabulous Blessing The Wilayat Of Ahl Ul-Bayt (‘A) And The Worldly Comforts And Blessings Who Are The Spiritual Fathers? Rights Of Sadat Does Anyone Have A Right Upon The Holy Prophet (S)? Goodness To Sadat And Paradise Rights Of The Brothers In Faith Silat Ar-Rahm With The Imam (‘A) 8. Eighth Greater Sin: Usurping The Property Of The Orphans https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/eighth-greater-sin-usurping-property Punishment For Usurping The Orphan’s Property Is Meted Out In This World This Is Not Against Divine Justice Tradition That Denounces The Usurpation Of Orphan’s Property The Death Of A Creditor And His Minor Children Severe Pain In The Eyes Of Amir Ul-Mu’minin (‘A) A Frightening Tradition Kindness Towards Orphans Guardian Of Minor Children The Affairs Of The Orphans Should Be Conducted With Care The Wealthy Guardian Of The Orphans The Impoverished Guardian Of The The Orphans The Property Of The Orphan Must Be Guarded Till He Attains Maturity Signs Of Puberty What Is The Meaning Of Rashid? 9. Ninth Greater Sin: Usury https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/ninth-greater-sin-usury Usury Is Against Intellect And Shari’a Is Trading And Usury One And The Same? Interest And Inequality Of Classes In Society Interest For Goodly Loans The One Who Indulges In Usury Is Deprived Of Goodness The Usurer Does Not Place Trust In Allah (S.W.T.) The Reward Of Giving A Loan Is More Than That Of Sadaqah The Fate Of The Usurer No Barakat In Interest War With Allah (S.W.T.) And The Holy Prophet (S) Traditions Denouncing Interest Interest Is Denounced In The Holy Qur’an The Sinner Is Deprived Of Religious Faith The Belly Of The Usurer Shall Be Filled With Fire Punishment Of Usurers In The Barzakh Usurers Under The Feet Of Fir’on Usury Is Worse Than Adultery Loan On Interest Some Important Points Transaction Involving Interest Three Important Points When Taking Interest Is Permitted 10. Tenth Greater Sin: Fornication https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/tenth-greater-sin-fornication The Meaning Of Ithm And Ghayyi An Evil Way To Fulfill The Sexual Urge The Evil Effects Of Adultery In This World And The Hereafter Fornicator In The Barzakh Fornicator On The Day Of Judgement The Stench Of The Fornicator Will Be A Nuisance For The People On The Day Of Judgement Unknown Progeny Fornication With Pure Women Islam Views The Problem From Every Angle Reasonable Precautions 1. The Order For Hijab In The Qur’an 2. Looking At The Non-Mahram The Poisonous Arrow Of Satan Fornication Of Organs In The Chains Of Fire With Iblis Alone In The Company Of Non-Mahram When Adultery Is Proved According To Shari’a Two Important Points I Was Raped By Over 70 Men Muslim Sexually Assaulted UK Grooming Gang Survivor - https://rumble.com/v710hto-i-was-raped-by-over-70-men-muslim-sexually-assaulted-uk-grooming-gang-survi.html So Why Do Muslim Men Rape Unveiling A Psychology Of A Rapist Behind Sexual Violence In Islam - https://rumble.com/v70zxxk-so-why-do-muslim-men-rape-unveiling-a-psychology-of-a-rapist-behind-sexual-.html Immigration And Rape 99.3% Of Egyptian Women Say They've Been Raped And Sexually Assaulted -https://rumble.com/v71zeo4-immigration-and-rape-99.3-of-egyptian-women-say-theyve-been-raped-and-sexua.html Legal Prostitution And Rape How Muslim Pleasure Marriage Work A Form Of Temporary Marriage -https://rumble.com/v720ifg-legal-prostitution-and-rape-how-muslim-pleasure-marriage-work-a-form-of-tem.html 11. Eleventh Greater Sin: Sodomy https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/eleventh-greater-sin-sodomy Sodomy Is Kufr (Disbelief) Punishment Upon The People Of Lut (‘A) The Slave Who Killed His Master A Homosexual Shall Be Counted Among The People Of Lut (‘A) Sodomy Is An Indecency A Lustful Glance On A Young Boy The Sensual Kiss And The Rein Of Hell Sleeping Together Of Two People Of The Same Sex The Punishment Of Sodomy Why Is Sodomy Punishable With Death? Fire Did Not Burn The Repentant! Remarkable Points The Mother, Sister And Daughter Of The Sodomist Why Some Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's "Bacha Bazi" Watching And Having Sex With Children -https://rumble.com/v5jg2tx-why-some-muslim-are-secret-pedophiles-bacha-bazi-watching-and-having-sex-wi.html So Why Some Men And Millions Other Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's Having Sex With Young Boys And Selling Young Girl As Sex Slaves Too. Bacha bāzī (Persian: lit. 'boy play') is a practice in which men (sometimes called bacha baz) buy and keep adolescent boys (sometimes called dancing boys) for entertainment and sex. It is a custom in Afghanistan and in historical Turkestan that has spread all over the Muslim world and often involves sexual slavery and child prostitution and even ritual murder by older men of young adolescent males. According to German ethnographic research, the phenomenon is up to a thousand years old. As far back as the 9th or 10th century, the mountainous regions that are now northern Afghanistan were known for this practice. Inbreeding And Rape How 72.6% Cousin Marriages Are Tearing Muslim World Apart - https://rumble.com/v72051e-inbreeding-and-rape-how-72.6-cousin-marriages-are-tearing-muslim-world-apar.html https://barenakedislam.com/2023/09/05/muslim-inbreeding-a-popular-islamic-custom-of-marrying-first-cousins-is-a-growing-problem-for-the-west/ 12. Twelfth Greater Sin: Qazaf https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/twelfth-greater-sin-qazaf Organs Of The Inhabitant Of Hell Penalty For Qazaf : Rejection Of Testimony And Its Invalidation Those Who Commits Qazaf Are Not Believers Penalty For Qazaf Expiation Of The Sin On The Day Of Judgement Repenting For Qazaf Qazaf And The Responsibility Of Other Muslims If Conditions For Qazaf Are Absent The Association Of The Kuffar With Adultery Abusive Language Is Haram Traditions That Denounce Abusive Language Replying To The Abuse If No Excess Is Committed Silence Is Better One Who Utters Abuses Will Himself Be Humiliated 13. Thirteenth Greater Sin: Drinking Liquor https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/thirteenth-greater-sin-drinking-liquor Effect Of Liquor On The Brain Effect Of Liquor On The Limbs Effect Of Alcohol On The Stomach Effect Of Alcohol On The Liver Effect Of Alcohol On The Blood Circulation Effect Of Alcohol On The Respiratory Organs Effect Of Alcohol On Kidneys Effect Of Alcohol On The Heart Effect Of Alcohol On Mental Faculties Effect Of Alcohol On The Offsprings Excessive Drinking Causes Sterility Alcoholism According To The Traditions Of Ahl Ul-Bayt (‘A) Liquor Is The Root Of All Evils Liquor Is Absolutely Haram Intoxicant Liquids Giving Liquor To Children Liquor At The Dinner Table Wine And Medicine Three Exceptions Wine Contains No Cure Drunkard On The Death-Bed Punishment For Drinking Liquor Aloofness From The Drunkard Do Not Give Your Daughter In Marriage To A Drunkard Boycott Of The Drunkard Jihad Against Intoxicants 14. Fourteenth Greater Sin: Gambling https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fourteenth-greater-sin-gambling What Do ‘Maesir’ And ‘Azlam’ Denote? Gambling And Wine Cause Avarice And Enmity Gambling Causes Voluptuousness And Sensuality Forgetting Allah (S.W.T.) Objects Of Gambling And Laying Of Bets Playing Games Of Chance Without Betting Betting With Articles Not Normally Used For Gambling Horse Racing And Archery Game Without Wager 15. Fifteenth Greater Sin: Music https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fifteenth-greater-sin-music Music, According To The Traditions Music Causes Shamelessness And Hypocrisy Musician And The Song Divine Bounties (Barakat) Are Removed The Blackened Face Of The Musician A House Where Music Is Played For Forty Days Music And The Last Period Of Time Effects Of Music On The Nervous System Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). In this text Ayatullah Dastghaib has exhaustively explained the phenomenon of sin, the classification of sins, the necessity of avoiding them, He has described fifty different types of Greater Sins such as: association with God (Shirk), fornication, drinking alcohol, gambling, disrespect towards parents and cutting ties with relatives. https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? - https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1078+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Islamic State Is Facing The Most Dangerous Times A Total Collapse In Its Entire History. With over 2 billion followers, Islam is a powerful religion, yet it faces a rapid religion decline in certain regions. This video explores the factors contributing to this trend, including demographic changes and societal shifts, using maps and statistics to illustrate the shrinking Muslim population. We examine the future of Islam and the implications of changing religious attendance across Europe. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Muhammad Married A 9-Year-Old Lady Ayesha Because Messenger of God Said So - https://rumble.com/v2q351m-muhammad-married-a-9-year-old-lady-ayesha-because-messenger-of-god-said-so.html Is it true that Muhammad married a child bride by the name of Ayesha when he was 53 and she was 9 years old? If so, how do Muslims justify this from their “exemplary” Prophet? The well-established, but not altogether agreed upon, tradition of Lady Ayesha’s age at the time of marrying Prophet Muhammad comes from a hadith in one of the most authentic collections – Sahih al-Bukhari in which Ayesha, herself, states: “The Messenger of God married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.” If I become president of America, the first thing I’m gonna do is find an executive order banning Islam as a terrorist hate group that’s a threat to our national security. Mohammed was a pedophile, and Islam is not a religion. It's a sick cult...one that should be abolished from society. I support everyone’s freedom of religion, but where your beliefs call for punishment, reprisals, and violence, it’s not a religion, it’s a cult. He married her age 6 and had sex, when she was 9. Btw, she was never pregnant and so she didn't have children of her own. I wonder why?!! May be he injured that 9 year old child? they can try to justify it anyway they want, it's pedophilia in every way you look at, they're sick demented people today. Wake Up Women: A Rights In USA & Somalia Overturns Law Banning Child Marriage Age 6 Years Old - https://rumble.com/v72fo8a-wake-up-women-a-rights-in-usa-and-somalia-overturns-law-banning-child-marri.html He got a revelation I agree 100%. He got that revelation from Satan himself. He was a pedophilia and yes the parents are guilty as well. They’re all process from the devil. He was so much a good man that he waited till she was 9 years old. Btw (by the way) he was the only prophet who has no prophecy fulfill. You no nothing about woman. Why did your prophet had to ask weather the voice he heard was from God or Satan. The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 So This Is How It Work... We Now Have 2 Million Muslims Living In New York City Very Soon In 2026. We Will Line The Street Of NYC Pride Events...Yes With Tens Of Thousands Guns & Knife & Hand Grenades Of All Types (Death To America ?) You Know... Guns Left To Us By President Joe Biden As Planned Per Agenda U.N. 21 and Agenda 2030 Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order Administration. (This May Help The Homeless In NYC With New 500,000+ Open Home For Rent In 2026). Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The group's public executions of gay men are part of a deliberate moral policing campaign, one aimed at showing supporters and enemies alike that it means to enforce its narrow, atavistic view of Islamic law wherever it can. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/islamic-states-views-homosexuality The main method used to kill these men has been to throw them off the roofs of high-rise buildings, based on a hadith in which the Prophet's successor, Abu Bakr, prescribes throwing a man off a cliff for engaging in homosexual acts. In other cases, victims were stoned, beheaded, or shot instead. Also We Muslim Are Planning To Get 10 Thousand New Police Jobs... As the NYPD has said that 8,600+ officers that are gonna be resigning, effective Jan. 1, 2026. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Yes This Is How Sick America Is Today ?... It's Pornhub right now sees approximately 3.5 billion monthly visits, translating to roughly 115 million daily users on average, according to recent statistics from 2024–2025. Parents Beware Internet Porn Cartoon Funny Starting Conversation With Your Kids -https://rumble.com/v2cehi2-parents-beware-internet-porn-cartoon-funny-starting-conversation-with-your-.html Pedophile's Run School Board Meeting About LGBTQ XXX Books in School Libraries -https://rumble.com/v2p5mds-pedophiles-run-school-board-meeting-about-lgbtq-xxx-books-in-school-librari.html Most Bizarre Sexual Deviations In The World Of Pedophile's Politicians And Celebrities -https://rumble.com/v2qly46-most-bizarre-sexual-deviations-in-the-world-of-pedophiles-politicians-and-c.html Sexual Disorder is a type of Personality Disorder that may be further divided into Sexual Dysfunction and Sexual Deviations. In Sexual Dysfunction there is a reduction or total loss of sexual capacity, which includes frigidity in females, and premature ejaculation and impotence in males. Sexual Deviation involves sexual interest directed primarily towards objects other than people of the opposite sex, towards objects not usually associated with sexual intercourse, or towards sexual intercourse performed under bizarre circumstances. This video lists and describes the 10 most bizarre Sexual Deviations in the world. TIMESTAMPS:-0:00Ten Bizarre Sexual Deviations -0:29Beastiality -1:11Exhibitionism -1:46Fetishism -2:11Homosexuality -2:51Incest -3:42Masochism and Sadism -4:19Pedophilia -4:46Transvestism -5:28Voyeurism All Hunter Biden Sex Crime Report On My Laptop Missing 100s Prostitutes Body's -https://rumble.com/v4hir8u-all-hunter-biden-sex-crime-report-on-my-laptop-missing-100s-prostitutes-bod.html All Hunter Biden Sex Crime Report On My Laptop Missing 100s Missing Or Dead Prostitutes Body Etc. Truth About Islam Laws In USA Tobacco, Coffee, And Alcohol Death Penalty For Violations. Adultery - Death penalty, stoning, lashing, banishment, or amputation of hand Alcohol - Death penalty Apostasy from Islam - Death penalty Coffee - Death penalty Murder - Death penalty, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Highway robbery - Execution, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Homosexuality - Death penalty Masturbation - Amputation of hand used Publishing pornography - Death penalty Rape- Death penalty Theft - Amputation of the right hand Smoking tobacco - Death penalty Witchcraft - Death penalty Robbing a caravans - Death penalty... But After Muhammad received intelligence about the Caravan's route, Muhammad ordered Zayd ibn Haritha to go after the Caravan, and they successfully raided is a Islamic military actions only. Muslim men may have only 4 wife at one time... But only Prophet Muhammad have sex with 9 women at one time ? According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. Scholars have stated that it is obligatory (wajib) for a female slave to submit to her master for sexual intimacy, and it is considered haram (forbidden) for her to refuse without a valid excuse. Refusal without a valid reason is described as disobedience, and the master is permitted to discipline her in a manner deemed appropriate by Shariah, including non-physical forms of correction such as verbal reprimand or deprivation of privileges. In some interpretations, if a slave refuses without a valid reason, her master may even be permitted to force her, although this is subject to the limits of permissible punishment. However, there are differing views on the matter. Some scholars argue that consent is not legally required because a slave is considered to have no agency and is not permitted to refuse her master's demands. Others, citing hadiths and ethical considerations, suggest that while the legal requirement may not demand consent, it is ethically desirable to seek the slave's approval, and that forcing her could cause harm, which is prohibited in Islam. For instance, Imam al-Haleemi is reported to have stated that if a slave woman dislikes being touched or having intercourse, her master should not do so without her permission. It is also important to note that a woman who was married before being enslaved is considered to have her previous marriage annulled upon enslavement, making her available for her master's sexual relations. However, if she was married after being enslaved, or if her marriage was not annulled, then her master cannot have intercourse with her, as she is considered married to another man. Furthermore, sexual relations are not permitted with polytheist or Zoroastrian slaves; conversion to Islam, Judaism, or Christianity is required, though the method and necessity of conversion are debated among scholars. Masturbation Is Forbidden An Prohibition - {And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts). Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, - for them, they are free from blame. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors.}(Al-Muminun 23:5-7). In summary, Islamic jurisprudence, as reflected in the provided sources, permits sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under the condition of lawful ownership, with the slave's previous marriage being nullified, and with the master's right to intimacy being considered a legal and religiously sanctioned benefit. Terror Slavery Chronicles & Other Woman Escapes Sexual Slavery Auction - https://rumble.com/v2d58c4-terror-slavery-chronicles-and-other-woman-escapes-sexual-slavery-auction-gr.html Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: It is not permissible for a man to have intercourse with anyone except his wife or his female slave (concubine). A wife becomes permissible after shar’i marriage and a concubine becomes permissible to the man who owns her. She may originally be a prisoner of war, and a Muslim may obtain a concubine from the ruler or commander if he took part in fighting in jihad, or if he buys her from her owner. She becomes permissible for him by virtue of his ownership after it is established that she is not pregnant by waiting for one menstrual cycle, or until she has given birth if she is pregnant. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts) 6. Except from their wives or (the slaves) that their right hands possess, ـــ for then, they are free from blame” [al-Mu’minoon 23:5-6] It was narrated that Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, concerning the prisoners of Awtaas: “Do not have intercourse with a pregnant woman until she gives birth, or with one who is not pregnant until she has menstruated once.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2157. This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albani in Irwa’ al-Ghaleel, 187. In the answer to question no. 10382 we have stated that Islam permits a man to have intercourse with his slave woman whether he has one or more wives or he is not married. In the answers to questions no. 5707 and 12562 it states that female prisoners of war may be distributed by the commander in jihad, because he has the choice of either distributing them, or ransoming them or setting them free. Sultan Murad IV of the Ottoman Empire closed coffeehouses and outlawed tobacco smoking, imposing the death penalty for violations. He viewed coffeehouses as centers of sedition where political dissent and conspiracy could flourish, particularly due to their association with the Janissaries, a military group that had previously deposed his brother and uncle, fueling his fear of rebellion. Yes he banned tobacco, coffee, and alcohol, enforcing the ban with extreme measures, including the execution of violators or suspected offenders. His enforcement was so severe that he personally patrolled the streets of Constantinople, disguised, to catch and execute those consuming coffee or smoking tobacco. The Bible Prescribes The Death Penalty For Other Evil Activities Same As Us Muslim Such As: Murder (Exo 21:12,14, Lev 24:17,21) Harming pregnant woman (Exo 21:22,23) Sorcery (Exo 22:18) Bestiality (Exo 22:19, Lev 20:15,16) Homosexuality (Lev 20:13) Blaspheming the name of the Lord (Lev 24:16) Worshipping false gods (Deu 13:6-10) Prostitution (Deu 22:24) and others. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Muslim women's can not work and all women are on Welfare and food stamps. What things are not allowed for women in Islam? Is not allowed by Islamic Law for A Woman to marry a non-Muslim man ever. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Then, a woman must obey him at all time. Muslim women's can not drive a car ever and can not open a bank acct. ever. Physical interaction between a man and a woman is not permitted in Islam. Islam does not allow women any kind of eye contact ever with anyone. Wearing strict and cleavage clothing with eyes and hand open only. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 A-Bomb How Powerful Are UK Nuclear Weapons - https://rumble.com/v71r52y-so-london-has-fallen-muslims-have-taken-over-8-a-bomb-how-powerful-are-uk-n.html So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 Atomic Bomb How Powerful Are The New Isis Muslims Are Now Running UK Nuclear Weapons Program? So London Has Fallen To Ten Million Muslims And The Islamic State Have Now Taken Over One Of UK Nuclear Powered Submarine With 8 A-Bomb On Board It And How Powerful Are UK Lost Of 8 Nuclear Weapons Now In Hands Of Millions Muslims Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws In 2026. Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v70xlx2-truth-about-muslim-death-cult-of-americastan-and-right-to-kill-you-under-is.html Truth Yes I'm Not Here To Offend Anyone Here, But Is It True That Muslims Are Told To Kill Other Religions? Its Not At All About "Islamophobia" As A Phrase Is Such A Complete Statement Today. Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. Islam, as a religion, does it promote a death cults and does it do or grant individuals a general right to kill under Islamic or Sharia law. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Yes It’s Happening Right Now New York City Starting January 02, 2026 As Your New Mayer Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. Muslim Zohran Mamdani Said This Video Is Like America Sheep Today: America Stuck On An Escalator Do They Live Or Die Wake Up Go After Your Dreams - https://rumble.com/v44jlzf-america-stuck-on-an-escalator-do-they-live-or-die-wake-up-go-after-your-dre.html And This Also Is America Today: Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits A Truly Disgusting Sex Laugh-In - https://rumble.com/v4b4tee-gilbert-gottfried-loves-jeanne-friends-with-benefits-a-truly-disgusting-sex.html Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits So We The Sheeple People Of U.S.A. ? But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. The ten most terrifying words in the English language are: (I'm from the your Government, and I'm here to help you). ha ha... Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers -https://rumble.com/v5bsc6b-want-to-stop-drunk-driver-from-killing-sober-drivers-its-easy-ban-sober-dri.html American Gun Control And The Right To Self Defense Is Over (Death To America). Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers That's How Gun Control Works Want to stop drunk driver from killing sober drivers ? its easy ban sober drivers that's how gun control works. You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. Muslims, for a really long time in this country, have been told that there is a privilege, that there is a privilege that we are given, and it might be taken away. We are told that we should be appropriate, we should go to school, get an education, raise our children and not bother anyone, not make any kind of noise. Don’t make anyone uncomfortable be a good Muslim. But no matter how much we have tried to be the best neighbor, people have always worked on finding a way to not allow for every single civil liberty to be extended to us. Islamic and Christian Religion are not compatible at all... its like oil and water do not mix at all today. No, it is not compatible. The Qur'an explicitly denies the divinity of Christ, which is one of the absolute bedrock tenets of the Christian faith. Without His divinity and associated sinlessness Christ's sacrifice and resurrection would carry no meaning or effect. One additional note: I thought it would round out this answer well. In it the author explains the doctrine of the Trinity and why it matters so much. The fact that Christ was divine and one part of a triune Godhead is critical to Christianity, and as I said the Qur'an denies it outright. A great summary of the Trinity from the article: The doctrine of the Trinity can be summarized in seven statements. (1) There is only one God. (2) The Father is God. (3) The Son is God. (4) The Holy Spirit is God. (5) The Father is not the Son. (6) The Son is the not the Holy Spirit. (7) The Holy Spirit is not the Father. All of the creedal formulations and theological jargon and philosophical apologetics have to do with safeguarding each one of these statements and doing so without denying any of the other six. Without a Trinity there is no Christianity, therein lies the direct conflict with the Qur'an. Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia In America - https://rumble.com/v45yg7z-rep.-ilhan-omar-say-72-american-muslims-want-to-see-establish-sharia-in-ame.html Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia Law In America For The People & By The People Slavery & Rape & Be-Heading Is All Part Islamic Law For All Peoples And All Colour Of People Alive Today. Yes Its Called Freedom Of Religion With "One Nation Under Allah". Do Muslims Believe Sharia Law Supersedes The Constitution? The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It prohibits Congress from promoting one religion over others and restricting an individual's religious practices. It also guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Free speech is a cherished value in the United States and is protected by the First Amendment. Capital punishment is permitted in Islamic jurisprudence only under specific legal conditions, such as for crimes like intentional murder (qisas), apostasy, adultery (zina), or banditry (hirabah), and must be carried out by a legitimate judicial authority, not by individuals. The death penalty is not a personal right but a legal sentence within a formal justice system. Even in cases of war or jihad, classical Islamic scholars have prohibited the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and civilians. Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages - https://rumble.com/v3pc2vu-both-side-issues-exposed-islamic-state-clerics-secret-sex-trade-pleasure-ma.html Some political figures have used inflammatory language, such as calling radical Shi'ite groups a "death cult," but these statements reflect personal opinions and do not represent mainstream Islamic beliefs or the views of the global Muslim community. Similarly, extremist interpretations that justify violence are widely rejected by Islamic scholars and institutions. In summary, Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. The misuse of religious texts to justify violence is condemned by mainstream Islamic scholarship, and the legal mechanisms for capital punishment are strictly regulated and judicial in nature. Male to Female Sex Reassignment Surgery Live ** Very Graphic ** Think Twice Guys ? -https://rumble.com/v2hpw3e-male-to-female-sex-reassignment-surgery-live-very-graphic-think-twice-guys-.html WoW This Looks Fun Lady's Keyhole Top Surgery For Female to Male Transgender --https://rumble.com/v2zsoao-wow-this-looks-fun-ladys-keyhole-top-surgery-for-female-to-male-transgender.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of America All Female Most Get Clitoris Removal Per Quran? -https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). 0. Greater Sins And Smaller Sins https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/greater-sins-and-smaller-sins 1. First Greater Sin: Shirk (Polytheism) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/first-greater-sin-shirk-polytheism 2. Second Greater Sin: Yas (Deaspair) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/second-greater-sin-yas-deaspair 3. Third Greater Sin: Qunut (Despondence) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/third-greater-sin-qunut-despondence 4. Fourth Greater Sin: Al-Amno Min Makrillah (Disregard Of Allah (S.W.T.)’S Punishment) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fourth-greater-sin-al-amno-min-makrillah 5. Fifth Greater Sin: Murder https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fifth-greater-sin-murder How To Kill Your Baby Abortion Procedures 1st, 2nd, And 3rd Trimesters & Other Great Baby Recipes -https://rumble.com/v6xigpw-how-to-kill-you-baby-abortion-procedures-1st-2nd-and-3rd-trimesters-and-oth.html New Mandate Law To Force All U.S.A. Female To Get Sex Genital Mutilation Survivors -https://rumble.com/v2hjog8-new-mandate-law-to-force-all-u.s.a.-female-to-get-sex-genital-mutilation-su.html 6. Sixth Greater Sin: ‘Aqq Al-Walidayn (Disobedience To Parents) https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/sixth-greater-sin-aqq-al-walidayn 7. Seventh Greater Sin: Qat’a Ar-Rahm https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/seventh-greater-sin-qata-ar-rahm 8. Eighth Greater Sin: Usurping The Property Of The Orphans https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/eighth-greater-sin-usurping-property 9. Ninth Greater Sin: Usury https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/ninth-greater-sin-usury 10. Tenth Greater Sin: Fornication https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/tenth-greater-sin-fornication I Was Raped By Over 70 Men Muslim Sexually Assaulted UK Grooming Gang Survivor - https://rumble.com/v710hto-i-was-raped-by-over-70-men-muslim-sexually-assaulted-uk-grooming-gang-survi.html So Why Do Muslim Men Rape Unveiling A Psychology Of A Rapist Behind Sexual Violence In Islam - https://rumble.com/v70zxxk-so-why-do-muslim-men-rape-unveiling-a-psychology-of-a-rapist-behind-sexual-.html Immigration And Rape 99.3% Of Egyptian Women Say They've Been Raped And Sexually Assaulted -https://rumble.com/v71zeo4-immigration-and-rape-99.3-of-egyptian-women-say-theyve-been-raped-and-sexua.html Legal Prostitution And Rape How Muslim Pleasure Marriage Work A Form Of Temporary Marriage -https://rumble.com/v720ifg-legal-prostitution-and-rape-how-muslim-pleasure-marriage-work-a-form-of-tem.html 11. Eleventh Greater Sin: Sodomy https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/eleventh-greater-sin-sodomy Why Some Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's "Bacha Bazi" Watching And Having Sex With Children -https://rumble.com/v5jg2tx-why-some-muslim-are-secret-pedophiles-bacha-bazi-watching-and-having-sex-wi.html So Why Some Men And Millions Other Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's Having Sex With Young Boys And Selling Young Girl As Sex Slaves Too. Bacha bāzī (Persian: lit. 'boy play') is a practice in which men (sometimes called bacha baz) buy and keep adolescent boys (sometimes called dancing boys) for entertainment and sex. Inbreeding And Rape How 72.6% Cousin Marriages Are Tearing Muslim World Apart - https://rumble.com/v72051e-inbreeding-and-rape-how-72.6-cousin-marriages-are-tearing-muslim-world-apar.html https://barenakedislam.com/2023/09/05/muslim-inbreeding-a-popular-islamic-custom-of-marrying-first-cousins-is-a-growing-problem-for-the-west/ 12. Twelfth Greater Sin: Qazaf https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/twelfth-greater-sin-qazaf 13. Thirteenth Greater Sin: Drinking Liquor https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/thirteenth-greater-sin-drinking-liquor 14. Fourteenth Greater Sin: Gambling https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fourteenth-greater-sin-gambling 15. Fifteenth Greater Sin: Music https://al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fifteenth-greater-sin-music 16. Is Masturbation Haram In Islam I have a question which I am shy to ask but another sister who has come to Islam recently wants an answer to and I do not have an answer (with evidence from the Quran and Sunnah). I hope you can help and I hope Allah will forgive me if it is inappropriate but as Muslims we should never be shy in seeking knowledge. Her question was "Is it permissible in Islam to masturbate?" May Allah increase us all in knowledge! Masturbation (for both men and women) is haram (forbidden) in Islam based on evidence from the Quran and the Sunnah. See the detailed answer for 13 tips on how to give up masturbation. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Is masturbation haram in Islam? Masturbation (for both men and women) is haraam (forbidden) in Islam based on the following evidence: Prohibition of masturbation in the Quran Al-Imam Shafi'i stated that masturbation is forbidden based on the following verses from the Quran (interpretation of the meaning): {And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts). Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, - for them, they are free from blame. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors.} (Al-Muminun 23:5-7) Here the verses are clear in forbidding all illegal sexual acts (including masturbation) except for the wives or what their right hand possesses. {And whoever seeks beyond that is the transgressor.} Some scholars used as evidence the ayah (in meaning), {And let those who find not the financial means for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah enriches them of His bounty.} (Al-Nur 24:33) This verse also clearly orders whoever does not have the financial means to marry to keep himself chaste and be patient in facing temptations (including masturbation) until Allah enriches them of His bounty. Prohibition of masturbation in the Sunnah 'Abdullaah ibn Mas’ud said, "We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) while we were young and had no wealth whatsoever. Allah's Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said, 'O young people! Whoever among you can marry, should marry, because it helps him lower his gaze and guard his modesty (i.e. his private parts from committing illegal sexual intercourse etc.), and whoever is not able to marry, should fast, as fasting diminishes his sexual power.'" (Al-Bukhari 5066) The hadeeth orders men who are not able to marry to fast despite the hardship encountered in doing so, and not to masturbate despite the ease with which it can be done. There is additional evidence that can be cited to support this ruling on masturbation, but due to the limited space we will not go through them here. Tips on how to give up masturbation As for curing/treating the habit of masturbation, we recommend the following suggestions: 1. The motive to seek a cure for this problem should be solely following Allah's orders and fearing His punishment. 2. A permanent and quick cure from this problem lies in marriage as soon as the person is able, as shown in the Prophet's (peace and blessings be upon him) hadeeth. 3. Keeping oneself busy with what is good for this world and the Hereafter is essential in breaking this habit before it becomes second nature after which it is very difficult to rid oneself of it. 4. Lowering the gaze (from looking at forbidden things such as pictures, movies etc.) will help suppress the desire before it leads one to commit the haram (forbidden). Allah orders men and women to lower their gaze as shown in the following two verses and in the Prophet's hadith. {Tell the believing men to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.). That is purer for them. Verily, Allah is all-aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.) ..... } (24: 30-31) Allah's Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Do not follow a casual (unintentional) look (at forbidden things) with another look." (Al-Tirmidhi, 2777) This is a general instruction by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) to abstain from all that may sexually excite a person because it might lead him/her to commit the haram (forbidden). 5. Using one's available leisure time in worshipping Allah and increasing religious knowledge. 6. Being cautious not to develop any of the medical symptoms that may result from masturbation such as weak eyesight, weak nervous system, and/or back pain. More importantly, feelings of guilt and anxiety that can be complicated by missing obligatory prayers because of the need to shower (ghusl) after every incidence of masturbation, especially in the winter, and the invalidating of the fast. 7. Avoiding the illusion that some youth have that masturbation is permissible because it prevents them from committing illegal sexual acts such as fornication or even homosexuality, while they may not be at the gates of that immorality to begin with. 8. Strengthening one's willpower and not surrendering to the shaytan, and avoiding spending time alone as recommended by the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) when he said "Do not spend the night alone" Ahmad, 6919. 9. Following the Prophet's (peace and blessings be upon him) aforementioned hadeeth and fasting when possible, because fasting will temper one's sexual desire and keep it under control. However, one should not overreact and swear by Allah not to return to the act because if one does not honor one's promise, one would be facing the consequences of not living up to one's oath to Allah. Also, note that medication to diminish one's sexual desire is strictly prohibited because it might permanently affect one's sexual ability. 10. Trying to follow the Prophet's (peace and blessings be upon him) recommendation concerning the etiquette of getting ready for bed, such as reading the well-known supplications, sleeping on the right side, and avoiding sleeping on the belly (the Prophet-peace and blessings be upon him- forbade sleeping on the belly). 11. Striving hard to be patient and chaste, because persistence will eventually, Allah willing, lead to attaining those qualities as second nature, as the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) explains in the following hadith: "Whoever seeks chastity Allah will make him chaste, and whoever seeks help from none but Allah, He will help him, and whoever is patient He will make it easy for him, and no one has ever been given anything better than patience." Al-Bukhari:1469. 12. If one falls into this sin, they must hasten to repent, asking forgiveness from Allah, doing good deeds, and not losing hope and feeling despair; these are all prerequisites to curing this problem. Note that losing hope is one of the major sins punishable by Allah. 13. Finally, Allah is the Most Merciful and He always responds to whoever calls on Him. So, asking for Allah's forgiveness and help will be accepted, by His will. And Allah knows best Wake Up Women: A Man Rights Over A Women Rights In Islamic America... You Are Not To Disobey Him Ever And The Rights Under A Muslim Husband Rights Over His Wife In America Under Islamic And Sharia Laws And Honor Killing Today! In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Muslim women's can not work and all women are on Welfare and food stamps. What things are not allowed for women in Islam? Is not allowed by Islamic Law for A Woman to marry a non-Muslim man ever. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Then, a woman must obey him at all time. Muslim women's can not drive a car ever and can not open a bank acct. ever. Physical interaction between a man and a woman is not permitted in Islam. Islam does not allow women any kind of eye contact ever with anyone. Wearing strict and cleavage clothing with eyes and hand open only. 1. Obedience in Matters of Righteousness: A wife is required to obey her husband in matters that do not involve disobedience to Allah. This obedience is not absolute and is conditional upon the husband's requests being reasonable and within the bounds of Islamic law. For example, a wife must not cut her hair short if her husband prefers long hair, as it is considered a form of beautification for him, but she is not obligated to obey if he demands she refrain from eating apples, as this does not pertain to his rights or benefit. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) stated that if he were to command someone to prostrate to another, he would command a woman to prostrate to her husband, highlighting the significance of this duty. 2. Protection of the Husband's Honor and Dignity: The wife has the duty to safeguard her husband's honor, dignity, and reputation. This includes refraining from any act of infidelity, disgrace, or behavior that could tarnish his name. She must also protect his wealth and children, as she is entrusted with the management of the household. 3. Maintaining the Husband's Home and Property: The wife is responsible for protecting and preserving the husband's property and belongings while he is away. This includes safeguarding his clothes, furniture, and other possessions, as she is considered the guardian of his home. 4. Not Allowing Unwanted Guests into the Home: The husband has the right to prevent any individual he dislikes from entering his house. The Prophet (PBUH) emphasized this right, stating that a wife must not allow anyone whom her husband dislikes to enter his home or sit on his furniture. 5. Not Leaving the House Without Permission: While a wife may leave the home for necessary reasons such as visiting her mother or going to the mosque, she should generally inform her husband and seek his permission, especially for outings that might cause concern or conflict. The Prophet (PBUH) permitted a wife to go to the mosque without her husband's permission, but this is an exception to the general rule of seeking approval for other outings. 6. Not Performing Voluntary Fasts Without Permission: A wife is not permitted to observe voluntary fasts, such as those on Mondays and Thursdays, while her husband is present, unless she has his explicit permission. This is because the husband has the right to intimacy, and fasting could potentially interfere with this right. The Prophet (PBUH) stated that it is not permissible for a woman to fast while her husband is present without his permission. 7. Being Content with the Husband's Provision: The wife must be satisfied with the standard of living that her husband provides, based on his financial ability. She should not burden him with demands for luxuries or a higher standard of living than he can afford. Allah states that a man should spend according to his means, and a woman should be content with what is provided. 8. Being Available for Intimacy: The wife is obligated to respond to her husband's request for intimacy whenever he calls her, unless she has a valid excuse such as illness, menstruation, or post-natal bleeding. Refusing intimacy without a valid reason is considered a serious sin, and the Prophet (PBUH) warned that angels curse a woman who refuses her husband's request for intimacy until she complies. 9. Taking Care of the Children: The wife is responsible for the upbringing and education of the children, teaching them Islamic values, the Quran, and the proper way to pray. This is a primary reason for marriage, as the husband works to provide for the family, while the wife nurtures the children. 10. Treating the Husband's Guests and Relatives with Kindness: The wife should treat her husband's guests, parents, and relatives with respect and hospitality. She is considered his representative, and her good treatment of them reflects positively on him. The Prophet (PBUH) praised a wife who treated his guests with such honor that he felt embarrassed by her generosity. 11. Keeping the Husband's Secrets: The wife must maintain the confidentiality of her husband's private matters, including those related to their intimate life. Sharing such secrets with family or friends is considered a breach of trust and a serious sin. The Prophet (PBUH) warned that a wife who speaks about her husband's private life will be cursed by Allah. 12. Refusing Your Husband Right To Have Your "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. All Female Most Have Their "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. So All Person's Live In U.S.A. Pre-Teens, Girls, Women Most Have Female Genital Mutilation Done by Sept 30, 2030 Per UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030. Religious leaders with sensitivity to intellectual debates of the time as well as the circumstances of the Muslim community have long taken an interest in the questions raised with respect to Islam and women. 13. Honor killing, defined as the murder of a family member typically a woman perceived to have brought shame upon the family, is not sanctioned by Islamic law and is widely condemned by Islamic scholars and religious authorities. While some cultural interpretations may link the concept to religious norms, Islamic teachings explicitly prohibit murder without legal justification, stating that intentionally killing a Muslim is a grave sin punishable by eternal damnation in Hell. Islamic law prescribes specific punishments for unlawful sexual relations (zina), but these are strictly defined and must be carried out by the state authority, not individuals. For a virgin woman who commits fornication, the prescribed punishment is 100 lashes and one year of exile, not execution. For a married person committing adultery, the punishment is stoning to death, but only after the crime is proven by the testimony of four male witnesses or a voluntary confession, and only after being judged by a legitimate judicial authority. The fatwa emphasized that Islam protects women’s rights and that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) once annulled a marriage contract when a woman expressed her unwillingness to marry the man her father had chosen. This underscores the principle that a woman’s consent is essential in marriage, and her autonomy is protected under Islamic law. Important Rules Related to Women in Islam Travelling Alone In Islam, it is not advisable for women to travel alone for safety reasons. This guidance is rooted in the principle of safeguarding women from potential harm and ensuring their protection during short or long journeys. However, it is essential to note that this guideline is not an absolute prohibition. Rather, it encourages Muslim women to travel in the company of a close family member or a trusted companion. This practice fosters a sense of community and mutual support, aligning with Islamic values of caring for one another. Going Outdoors without a Head Covering Another commonly misunderstood aspect of Islamic practice is the requirement for women to wear a head covering, often referred to as a hijab. The hijab is a crucial symbol of modesty and a reflection of a woman's commitment to her faith. It is essential to understand that wearing a hijab is a personal choice for Muslim women, and not all women adhere to this practice. Women who choose to wear the hijab do so willingly, as an expression of their faith and a means of identifying as Muslim. Eye Contact with Men In Islam, modesty is highly valued, and this includes interactions between men and women. While maintaining eye contact during conversations is generally encouraged as a sign of sincerity and respect, it is recommended that both men and women lower their gaze when speaking with the opposite sex. This practice is intended to prevent inappropriate or lustful thoughts from arising during such interactions, promoting respectful communication and upholding modesty. Physical Contact or Interaction with Men Physical contact between unrelated men and women is discouraged in Islam, primarily to maintain the sanctity of family life and protect against potential temptations. This guideline encompasses avoiding casual physical touch, such as hugging or handshaking, with members of the opposite gender. While this practice might seem restrictive to some, it is intended to uphold the importance of chastity and modesty within the Muslim community. Marrying Non-Muslims In Islam, marriage is considered a sacred bond between two individuals who share the same faith and value system. The guidance against marrying non-Muslims is rooted in the core belief that a shared faith strengthens the foundation of a marriage and promotes harmony within the family. It is imperative to note that this guideline does not stem from a place of discrimination but rather seeks to protect the religious and cultural identity of both partners in a marriage. Disobeying Husband Islam places great importance on maintaining harmony within the family unit, and this includes the relationship between a husband and wife. While it is often pointed out that women are advised to obey their husbands, this guidance should be understood within the broader context of mutual respect and cooperation. Husbands are also instructed in Islam to treat their wives with kindness and respect. The chief intention behind this guideline is to encourage open communication and cooperation between spouses, ensuring a peaceful and loving home. Inappropriate or Revealing Clothing Islamic dress code emphasises modesty for both men and women alike. Women are advised to wear clothing that covers their bodies except for their face and hands, and also to avoid wearing apparel that highlights their shape. Men are encouraged to dress modestly as well. The intent behind this dress code is to promote humility, dignity, and respect for oneself and others. Contrary to misconceptions, this practice is not meant to impede individual expression but rather to maintain modesty and prevent objectification. Perfumes and Other Items that Attract Attention Perfumes and fragrances are an integral part of many cultures, including Islam. However, it is advised that women do not wear strong fragrances or scents when going outside, as this can attract undue attention. This recommendation is rooted in the broader principle of modesty and the desire to avoid situations that may lead to inappropriate or unwanted advances. It is important to note that the use of perfumes in private settings is not discouraged and is an intensely personal choice. Summary In understanding the guidelines and practices regarding women in Islam, it is crucial to approach these topics with respect and an open mind. The intention behind these guidelines is not to restrict women but to uphold the values of modesty, morality, and the sanctity of family life within the community. Muslim women, like women from any other faith, make choices regarding their beliefs and practices based on their personal convictions and cultural context. Ultimately, these guidelines reflect the diversity and richness of Islamic tradition, and they continue to be interpreted and followed in a myriad of ways by Muslim women worldwide. Muslim women are guided by a set of religious principles derived from the Quran, Hadith, and scholarly interpretations, which outline both rights and responsibilities. These rules are intended to promote modesty, dignity, spiritual balance, and social harmony. Key rules and restrictions for Muslim women include: Modesty in Dress (Hijab): Women are required to cover their bodies in public, except for the face and hands, wearing loose, non-transparent clothing that does not draw attention to the body. The hijab is seen as a symbol of faith and personal integrity, though the extent of coverage—such as whether the face must be covered (niqab/burqa)—is a matter of scholarly debate and cultural practice, with many scholars considering it optional. Going out without covering the head is generally considered forbidden in Islamic teachings. Prayer (Salah): Women are required to perform five daily prayers, which are considered intimate moments of connection with God. However, prayer is not obligatory during menstruation or postpartum bleeding, which is viewed as a form of divine mercy rather than punishment. Fasting (Sawm): Fasting during Ramadan is obligatory for all adult Muslims, including women, except during menstruation or postpartum. Women may also observe voluntary fasts for spiritual growth. Marriage and Family Life: A woman has the right to choose her spouse, receive a dowry (mahr) from her husband, and retain full ownership of her wealth and property after marriage. Marriage is viewed as a partnership based on mutual respect, consultation, and kindness, with the husband responsible for providing financial maintenance. Women are not permitted to marry non-Muslim men, as this is believed to preserve religious unity and spiritual identity within the family. Interactions with Non-Mahram Men: Physical contact, including casual hugs or handshakes, with non-mahram men (men who are not close relatives) is discouraged to maintain modesty and prevent temptation. Women are advised to lower their gaze and avoid speaking in a soft or alluring voice when interacting with non-mahram men. Being alone with an unrelated man is generally discouraged, though it may be acceptable if others are present. Polygamy: While men are permitted to marry up to four wives under specific conditions, women are not allowed to have multiple husbands at the same time. Leadership in Religious Matters: Women are not permitted to lead mixed-gender congregational prayers as an Imam, though they can lead prayers for other women. This restriction is based on traditional interpretations of Islamic law, though some modern scholars argue for reinterpretation. Inheritance and Property Rights: Women have the right to inherit property from parents, spouses, and siblings, though their share is typically half that of a male heir. This is balanced by the fact that men are responsible for financially supporting the family, while women are not obligated to contribute to household expenses. Education and Work: Women have the right to pursue education and work in any field that aligns with Islamic values, including healthcare, education, and social welfare. Historical figures like Khadijah, the Prophet Muhammad’s wife, were successful businesswomen, demonstrating that women can be economically independent. Prohibited Acts: Extramarital relations, including adultery and fornication, are strictly forbidden for both men and women. These acts are considered major sins under Islamic law and may carry severe consequences under Sharia. While some interpretations emphasize restrictions, Islamic teachings also emphasize empowerment, dignity, and spiritual equality. The Quran affirms that both men and women are equal in the eyes of God, and that righteous deeds, regardless of gender, lead to Paradise. The rules are not meant to limit but to guide women toward a life of purpose, integrity, and divine consciousness. In Islam, a man is permitted to marry up to four wives simultaneously, a practice known as polygyny. This allowance is based on Quranic verse 4:3, which states: "And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one". The permission is conditional upon the man's ability to treat all wives equally in terms of financial support, living arrangements, and time spent with each wife. If a man fears he cannot uphold this justice, he is instructed to marry only one wife. While polygyny is permitted, it is not encouraged. Many classical Islamic scholars, including those from the Hanbali and Shafi‘i schools of jurisprudence, consider monogamy to be preferable and even recommend it as a Sunnah (practice of the Prophet Muhammad). The Prophet Muhammad himself had multiple wives, but this is seen as a unique circumstance applicable only to him, and other men are limited to four wives. The practice is viewed by some as a social remedy for specific situations, such as caring for widows and orphans left behind after wars, particularly in historical contexts where there were significant imbalances in the male-to-female population. However, contemporary views vary widely, with some modernist scholars arguing that polygamy should be restricted to cases of necessity or even banned due to its potential negative impacts on mental health and family dynamics. Others maintain that it remains a valid and beneficial institution within Islamic law. Prophet Muhammad have sex with 9 women at one time ? It is important to note that polyandry where a woman marries multiple men is strictly forbidden in Islam. Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? - https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1078+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... The Dangers Of Radical Islam In 5 Minute Video... Anyone Who Ever Leave Islam Will Die... So All White America Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period Today July 04, 2026 Will Go Down In Jihad History Death To USA. Some 92% Of All Muslims Alive Today USA Believe That Jihad Is Primarily A Call To Holy War Against All Skin Color Of Any Nonbelievers, Sinners, Heretics, And Apostates. The Plan To Force All America Under Sharia Law Here’s What They’re Hiding A Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance ? Yes This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because America You Are Considered " A Enemy Of Allah" Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here. My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you. But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming. And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today. All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only. According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess". The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction. The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed. The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave". Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today. https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/ Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism. Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns. A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca. This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.? Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today? https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now! They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently. Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence: Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.” Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing. These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression. This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.” Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day. The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam. Quranic verses include: Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…” Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…” Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…” Examples of Hadith include: Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.” Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’” Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it. Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’” Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’” These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion. Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience. Abolish Blasphemy Laws NOW: A Call to Action We, at Ex-Muslims International, demand: 1. The immediate repeal of blasphemy laws worldwide. 2. The unconditional release of all those accused of blasphemy. 3. Sanctions against governments that enforce blasphemy and apostasy laws. 4. Asylum for those fleeing persecution on blasphemy and apostasy grounds. 5. A global commitment to Laicite, free expression and conscience, without exceptions for religions. The group's public executions of gay men are part of a deliberate moral policing campaign, one aimed at showing supporters and enemies alike that it means to enforce its narrow, atavistic view of Islamic law wherever it can. Truth About Islam Laws In USA Tobacco, Coffee, And Alcohol Death Penalty For Violations. Adultery - Death penalty, stoning, lashing, banishment, or amputation of hand Alcohol - Death penalty Apostasy from Islam - Death penalty Coffee - Death penalty Murder - Death penalty, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Highway robbery - Execution, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Homosexuality - Death penalty Masturbation - Amputation of hand used Publishing pornography - Death penalty Rape- Death penalty Theft - Amputation of the right hand Theft 2nd time is - Death penalty Smoking tobacco - Death penalty Witchcraft - Death penalty Robbing a caravans - Death penalty... Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 A-Bomb How Powerful Are UK Nuclear Weapons - https://rumble.com/v71r52y-so-london-has-fallen-muslims-have-taken-over-8-a-bomb-how-powerful-are-uk-n.html So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 Atomic Bomb How Powerful Are The New Isis Muslims Are Now Running UK Nuclear Weapons Program? So London Has Fallen To Ten Million Muslims And The Islamic State Have Now Taken Over One Of UK Nuclear Powered Submarine With 8 A-Bomb On Board It And How Powerful Are UK Lost Of 8 Nuclear Weapons Now In Hands Of Millions Muslims Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws In 2026. Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v70xlx2-truth-about-muslim-death-cult-of-americastan-and-right-to-kill-you-under-is.html Truth Yes I'm Not Here To Offend Anyone Here, But Is It True That Muslims Are Told To Kill Other Religions? Its Not At All About "Islamophobia" As A Phrase Is Such A Complete Statement Today. Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. Islam, as a religion, does it promote a death cults and does it do or grant individuals a general right to kill under Islamic or Sharia law. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Yes It’s Happening Right Now New York City Starting January 02, 2026 As Your New Mayer Zohran Mamdani Wants Every American To Become Muslim And Impose A Jizya Tax, Or Threaten Of Death For Non-Compliance. The Jizya Tax Is A Tax Historically Imposed On Non-Muslims Living In An Islamic State Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways. Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology. Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history. The Quran: Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief. Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things." Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot. Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help." Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah'). Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers. Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…" Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks." Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle). According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause. Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense? Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement" Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle. Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end." Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals." Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..." Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy." Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..." Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert. Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims. Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war. Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths. Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!" Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell. Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians). Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith. Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper." Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer? Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness." Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam). Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).) Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?" Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse. Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations. Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you," Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell. Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26.. Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought. Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad. Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org From the Hadith: Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings. Bukhari (52:65) - The Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause. Muhammad's words are the basis for offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force. This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today. Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror' Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist) Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally." Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah." Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'." Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes." Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..." Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!" Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'" Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)." Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war... When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them." Bukhari 1:35 "The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed)." Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power." Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim. Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us" The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam. Tabari 17:187 "'By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former religion." The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali. Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’” Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve. Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah." Muhammad's instructions to his men prior to a military raid. Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship." One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief. Additional Notes: Other than the fact that Muslims haven't killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism. The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses of Islam's most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood. Those that do are earlier "Meccan" verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones. The example of Muhammad is that Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims do not have the power and numbers on their side. Once they do, then things change. Many Muslims are peaceful and do not want to believe what the Quran plainly says. They reach subjectively for textual context across different suras to try and mitigate the harsher passages. Even though the Quran itself claims to be clear and complete, Muslim apologists speak of the "risks" of trying to interpret the verses without their "assistance." Like many religious people, they want the text to fit their pre-established moral framework. Far from being mere history or theological construct, the violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni's bloody conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam's Genghis Khan) slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today's Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran. So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself. Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and even butchered captives. He actually inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members were slaughtered. It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion's most dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death. The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves. Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to attack in self-defense, this is an oxymoron that is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad. Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day marriage"). One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way." Elsewhere, he notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life." The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Qur'an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect." Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that "the Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time," tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule - bound only by the capacity for success. (source) Muhammad's failure to leave a clear line of succession resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew him best first fought to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda or 'Apostasy wars'). Then, within the closer community, early Meccan converts battled later ones. Hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad's own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter - a jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others' throats to this day. The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression, warfare...) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism. This is what makes the Quran's verses of violence so dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book, and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them - outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam's holiest book either speaks to Allah's hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it's little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community - even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in this way. Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam's most respected philosophers, understood that "the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force", many other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran's near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. In the West, it is typical for believers to think that their religion must be like Christianity - preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance - because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to find that this is contradicted by the Quran and the bloody history of Islam's genesis. Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the "culture", claiming that the father was merely following "the religion" and saying that the couple had to "discipline their daughter or lose respect." (source). In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious "holy pilgrimage" to Mecca by the Saudi king - without a single Muslim voice raised in protest. For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous. There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran literally... and too many others who couldn't care less about the violence done in the name of Islam. Jihad, Jizya, and Just War Theory The Qur’an and other Muslim sources contain both peaceful and violent passages. Muslims in the West (as well as politicians and the media) generally emphasize Muhammad’s peaceful teachings, while jihadists emphasize his more violent and radical commands. Although these “two faces” of Islam may seem opposed to one another, a careful examination shows that peace and violence are separate stages of a larger Islamic program, the ultimate goal of which is the violent subjugation of non-Muslims. According to the Qur’an and the example set by Muhammad, Muslims are to adapt their message and tactics to their status in society. When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a battle against non-Muslims, they are commanded to promote tolerance as a means of protecting the Muslim community. When their numbers grow sufficient for military action, Muslims are told to defend themselves, through terrorism if necessary, from both persecution and criticism. If Muslims come to dominate a society, they are ordered to subjugate the non-Muslim population actively. Because the requirements and goals of jihad are at odds with the most basic constraints of just war theory, Islam cannot be reformed without abandoning adherence to Muhammad’s commands. “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.” —Qur’an 48:29, Hilali-Khan “But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven.” —Matthew 5:44–451 Over the past fourteen centuries, more than 270 million people have been killed in the name of Islam. More recently, the world has seen deadly riots over a novel (Salman Rushdie’sThe Satanic Verses), cartoons (published by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten), and a poorly made YouTube video (a trailer for a film portraying Muhammad), all of which were deemed blasphemous by Muslim leaders. Since the destruction of the World Trade Center, jihadists have carried out approximately twenty thousand terrorist attacks globally. Yet many Muslims, especially in the West, have condemned religious-based violence. Pointing to Qur’an verses such as 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”), they claim that Islam is inherently peaceful, and that terrorism for the sake of Allah is the result ofpervertingMuhammad’s message. Just as we would not condemn Christianity as a whole because of the actions of people who distort Jesus’ teachings, so also we should not condemn Islam as a whole because of the actions of a minority of “extremists.” Hence, people of our generation are witnessing two very different faces of Islam—one shouting “Allahu Akbar!” and the other calling for tolerance. Which group represents Islam? Interestingly, they both do, for Islam has different sets of rules for Muslims in different circumstances. Muslims in America who proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace are doing exactly what Islam commands, 3 while Muslims in Pakistan who oppress non-Muslim minorities are also doing exactly what Islam commands. Jihad proceeds in stages. In this article, we will develop a deeper understanding of the Islamic concept of jihad by working our way past two common blunders—namely, (1) that Islam doesn’t call for violence against non-Muslims, and (2) that even if Islam does promote violence towards unbelievers, any long-term threat will be minimal, because Islam, like other religions, can be reformed. Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You ! P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today). https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392 Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? - https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

We Want All America To Remember That Islam Is A Religion Peace Period ! And This Is What The Peace Loving Muslim's & Taliban Did To It Own Muslim Females Is Hard To Stomach And Yes "Allah Love You" The Real Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws Today. So All America Remember Islam A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc. The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Wake Up Women: A Man Rights Over A Women Rights In Islamic America... You Are Not To Disobey Him Ever And The Rights Under A Muslim Husband Rights Over His Wife In America Under Islamic And Sharia Laws And Honor Killing Today! In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Below. Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html True History 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy Finally Solved For Dummies Names, Connections, Motives - https://rumble.com/v6yyyhy-true-history-911-false-flag-conspiracy-finally-solved-for-dummies-names-con.html Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html I Was Raped By Over 70 Men Muslim Sexually Assaulted UK Grooming Gang Survivor - https://rumble.com/v710hto-i-was-raped-by-over-70-men-muslim-sexually-assaulted-uk-grooming-gang-survi.html Muhammad Married A 9-Year-Old Lady Ayesha Because Messenger of God Said So- https://rumble.com/v2q351m-muhammad-married-a-9-year-old-lady-ayesha-because-messenger-of-god-said-so.html 1. Obedience in Matters of Righteousness: A wife is required to obey her husband in matters that do not involve disobedience to Allah. This obedience is not absolute and is conditional upon the husband's requests being reasonable and within the bounds of Islamic law. For example, a wife must not cut her hair short if her husband prefers long hair, as it is considered a form of beautification for him, but she is not obligated to obey if he demands she refrain from eating apples, as this does not pertain to his rights or benefit. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) stated that if he were to command someone to prostrate to another, he would command a woman to prostrate to her husband, highlighting the significance of this duty. 2. Protection of the Husband's Honor and Dignity: The wife has the duty to safeguard her husband's honor, dignity, and reputation. This includes refraining from any act of infidelity, disgrace, or behavior that could tarnish his name. She must also protect his wealth and children, as she is entrusted with the management of the household. 3. Maintaining the Husband's Home and Property: The wife is responsible for protecting and preserving the husband's property and belongings while he is away. This includes safeguarding his clothes, furniture, and other possessions, as she is considered the guardian of his home. 4. Not Allowing Unwanted Guests into the Home: The husband has the right to prevent any individual he dislikes from entering his house. The Prophet (PBUH) emphasized this right, stating that a wife must not allow anyone whom her husband dislikes to enter his home or sit on his furniture. 5. Not Leaving the House Without Permission: While a wife may leave the home for necessary reasons such as visiting her mother or going to the mosque, she should generally inform her husband and seek his permission, especially for outings that might cause concern or conflict. The Prophet (PBUH) permitted a wife to go to the mosque without her husband's permission, but this is an exception to the general rule of seeking approval for other outings. 6. Not Performing Voluntary Fasts Without Permission: A wife is not permitted to observe voluntary fasts, such as those on Mondays and Thursdays, while her husband is present, unless she has his explicit permission. This is because the husband has the right to intimacy, and fasting could potentially interfere with this right. The Prophet (PBUH) stated that it is not permissible for a woman to fast while her husband is present without his permission. 7. Being Content with the Husband's Provision: The wife must be satisfied with the standard of living that her husband provides, based on his financial ability. She should not burden him with demands for luxuries or a higher standard of living than he can afford. Allah states that a man should spend according to his means, and a woman should be content with what is provided. 8. Being Available for Intimacy: The wife is obligated to respond to her husband's request for intimacy whenever he calls her, unless she has a valid excuse such as illness, menstruation, or post-natal bleeding. Refusing intimacy without a valid reason is considered a serious sin, and the Prophet (PBUH) warned that angels curse a woman who refuses her husband's request for intimacy until she complies. 8a. Refusing intimacy without a valid reason is considered a serious sin, and the Prophet (PBUH) warned that angels curse a woman who refuses her husband's request for intimacy until she complies. Refusing intimacy without a valid reason is considered a serious sin in Islamic teachings, and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) warned that angels curse a woman who refuses her husband's request for intimacy until she complies. This warning is based on a hadith narrated by Abu Hurayrah, in which the Prophet (PBUH) said: “If a man calls his wife to bed and she refuses to come, the angels curse her until morning”. The term “bed” in this context is understood as a metaphor for sexual intercourse, as supported by scholars who note that metaphors are commonly used in the Quran and Sunnah for matters of modesty. The curse is specifically tied to the wife’s refusal without a legitimate excuse, such as illness, menstruation, fasting an obligatory fast, or being in a state of Ihram. If a woman refuses without such a reason, especially when her husband is angry and spends the night upset, the angels are said to curse her until morning. This curse continues until she repents and returns to her husband, or until her husband is pleased with her. Scholars emphasize that this hadith underscores the importance of fulfilling marital rights, as the husband’s patience in abstaining from intimacy is considered weaker than the wife’s, and the desire for sexual intimacy is seen as a powerful force that can lead to sin if not properly managed. The hadith also highlights that the wife should help her husband and seek his satisfaction, as this is part of maintaining harmony in marriage. It is important to note that the curse applies only when the refusal is unwarranted and causes the husband to be angry. If the husband is the one who initiated the separation or is treating her unfairly, then she is not to blame. Additionally, the hadith’s reference to night is not a restriction to nighttime only; other narrations indicate that the principle applies both day and night, as the underlying issue is the denial of a marital right. While the angels curse the wife in such cases, this does not grant the husband permission to force her or treat her unjustly; the emphasis remains on mutual respect, consent, and the fulfillment of rights within the marriage contract. 8b. If a wife does not allow her husband to have intercourse, should he divorce her or should he marry a second wife? The answer may be found in a hadith narrated by Muslim: “By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, there is no man who calls his wife to his bed and she refuses, but the One Who is above the heavens [i.e. Allah] will be angry with her, until he (her husband) is pleased with her.” Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: If a woman refuses her husband’s request to come to bed with no Islamically-sound reason (such as sickness, or his being drunk, for example), what happens is as described below: Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: ‘If a man calls his wife to his bed and she refuses [and does not come], and he spends the night angry with her, the angels will curse her until morning.’” (Reported by al-Bukhari, 4794; the additional phrase quoted in square brackets is from Abu Dawud, al-Sunan, Kitab al-Nikaah, Bab haqq al-zawj ‘ala’l-mar-ah). In the phrase “if a man calls his wife to his bed,” the word “bed” is obviously a metaphor for intercourse. Metaphors are used in the Quran and Sunnah to refer to things about which people usually feel shy. Does this apply only to the nighttime, or does it include the daytime too? The answer may be found in a hadith narrated by Muslim: “By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, there is no man who calls his wife to his bed and she refuses, but the One Who is above the heavens [i.e. Allah] will be angry with her, until he (her husband) is pleased with her.” Ibn Khuzaymah and Ibn Hibban report a hadith narrated by Jabir: “There are three whose prayers will not be accepted and none of whose good deeds will ascend to heaven: a runaway slave, until he returns to his master; a drunken man until he becomes sober; and a woman with whom her husband is angry, until he is pleased with her.” These are general terms, which include both night and day. The phrase “and he spends the night angry with her” refers to the cause of the angels’ curse, because this confirms that she is a sinner, which is a different matter than if he accepts her excuse and is not angry with her, or lets the matter drop. Is she to blame if he keeps her away from his bed? The answer is: no, unless she is the one who started the separation and he is keeping away from her because of it, and she did not apologize but prolonged the separation. But if he is the one who started it, and is thus treating her unfairly, then she is not to blame. In one report, instead of the words “the angels curse her until morning,” the wording is “… until she returns” – and this is a useful variant. This hadith tells us that denying a spouse’s rights – whether physical or financial – is something that will inevitably bring about the wrath of Allah, unless Allah grants His mercy to the sinner. We also learn that the angels will pray against a sinner so long as he or she persists in the sin. The hadith also directs a wife to help her husband and seek his satisfaction, because a man is less patient than a woman when it comes to doing without intercourse. The most disturbing thing for a man is his sexual impulse, so Islam urges women to help their husbands in this regard. (Adapted and abbreviated from the commentary by al-Hafiz Ibn Hijr – may Allah have mercy on him – on this hadith in Fath al-Bari). Whether the husband wants to discipline his wife, or forgive her, or take another wife, or divorce her, this is all up to him to choose. Let the woman beware of incurring her husband’s wrath because this will lead to Allah’s being angry with her. We ask Allah to rectify this situation. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad. And Allah knows best. 9. Taking Care of the Children: The wife is responsible for the upbringing and education of the children, teaching them Islamic values, the Quran, and the proper way to pray. This is a primary reason for marriage, as the husband works to provide for the family, while the wife nurtures the children. 10. Treating the Husband's Guests and Relatives with Kindness: The wife should treat her husband's guests, parents, and relatives with respect and hospitality. She is considered his representative, and her good treatment of them reflects positively on him. The Prophet (PBUH) praised a wife who treated his guests with such honor that he felt embarrassed by her generosity. 11. Keeping the Husband's Secrets: The wife must maintain the confidentiality of her husband's private matters, including those related to their intimate life. Sharing such secrets with family or friends is considered a breach of trust and a serious sin. The Prophet (PBUH) warned that a wife who speaks about her husband's private life will be cursed by Allah. 12. Refusing Your Husband Right To Have Your "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a custom carried out to control girls' and women's bodies and their sexuality, often rooted in gender inequality and harmful social norms. It is performed to regulate female sexuality, ensure premarital virginity and marital fidelity, and reinforce cultural ideals of femininity and modesty. The practice is not endorsed by any religion, despite being falsely justified by religious beliefs, and is widely supported by communities due to social pressure and the fear of ostracism. FGM is recognized internationally as a violation of human rights, including the rights to health, physical integrity, and freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. All Female Most Have Their "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. So All Person's Live In U.S.A. Pre-Teens, Girls, Women Most Have Female Genital Mutilation Done by Sept 30, 2030 Per UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030. Religious leaders with sensitivity to intellectual debates of the time as well as the circumstances of the Muslim community have long taken an interest in the questions raised with respect to Islam and women. 13. Honor killing, defined as the murder of a family member typically a woman perceived to have brought shame upon the family, is not sanctioned by Islamic law and is widely condemned by Islamic scholars and religious authorities. The practice is often associated with cultural traditions in certain regions, including parts of the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia, rather than being a universal Islamic doctrine. While some cultural interpretations may link the concept to religious norms, Islamic teachings explicitly prohibit murder without legal justification, stating that intentionally killing a Muslim is a grave sin punishable by eternal damnation in Hell. Islamic law prescribes specific punishments for unlawful sexual relations (zina), but these are strictly defined and must be carried out by the state authority, not individuals. For a virgin woman who commits fornication, the prescribed punishment is 100 lashes and one year of exile, not execution. For a married person committing adultery, the punishment is stoning to death, but only after the crime is proven by the testimony of four male witnesses or a voluntary confession, and only after being judged by a legitimate judicial authority. The execution of such a punishment by family members is strictly forbidden and considered a major transgression. A fatwa issued by the Sunnī Ittehad Council of Pakistan in 2021, signed by forty Muslim scholars, declared honor killing to be heresy (kuffur) and an "unpardonable sin," explicitly stating that burning or killing a woman for marrying someone of her choice is contrary to Islamic teachings. The fatwa emphasized that Islam protects women’s rights and that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) once annulled a marriage contract when a woman expressed her unwillingness to marry the man her father had chosen. This underscores the principle that a woman’s consent is essential in marriage, and her autonomy is protected under Islamic law. Despite these religious rulings, honor killings persist in some Muslim-majority countries due to social pressures, patriarchal norms, and weak legal enforcement. In countries like Pakistan and Jordan, legal loopholes and lenient sentencing have allowed perpetrators to avoid justice, although reforms have been attempted. In Pakistan, a 2016 legal amendment aimed to close a loophole that previously allowed reduced sentences for honor killings, though its effectiveness remains limited. Social pressure plays a significant role, with many perpetrators citing societal expectations and fear of dishonor as motivations for their actions. In conclusion, honor killing is not supported by authentic Islamic teachings. It is a violation of Islamic principles, a criminal act under Islamic law, and a grave sin that contradicts the Qur’anic prohibition against unlawful killing. Religious authorities and modern legal reforms continue to work toward eradicating the practice by reinforcing the rights of women and ensuring justice through proper legal channels. Important Rules Related to Women in Islam Travelling Alone In Islam, it is not advisable for women to travel alone for safety reasons. This guidance is rooted in the principle of safeguarding women from potential harm and ensuring their protection during short or long journeys. However, it is essential to note that this guideline is not an absolute prohibition. Rather, it encourages Muslim women to travel in the company of a close family member or a trusted companion. This practice fosters a sense of community and mutual support, aligning with Islamic values of caring for one another. Going Outdoors without a Head Covering Another commonly misunderstood aspect of Islamic practice is the requirement for women to wear a head covering, often referred to as a hijab. The hijab is a crucial symbol of modesty and a reflection of a woman's commitment to her faith. It is essential to understand that wearing a hijab is a personal choice for Muslim women, and not all women adhere to this practice. Women who choose to wear the hijab do so willingly, as an expression of their faith and a means of identifying as Muslim. Eye Contact with Men In Islam, modesty is highly valued, and this includes interactions between men and women. While maintaining eye contact during conversations is generally encouraged as a sign of sincerity and respect, it is recommended that both men and women lower their gaze when speaking with the opposite sex. This practice is intended to prevent inappropriate or lustful thoughts from arising during such interactions, promoting respectful communication and upholding modesty. Physical Contact or Interaction with Men Physical contact between unrelated men and women is discouraged in Islam, primarily to maintain the sanctity of family life and protect against potential temptations. This guideline encompasses avoiding casual physical touch, such as hugging or handshaking, with members of the opposite gender. While this practice might seem restrictive to some, it is intended to uphold the importance of chastity and modesty within the Muslim community. Marrying Non-Muslims In Islam, marriage is considered a sacred bond between two individuals who share the same faith and value system. The guidance against marrying non-Muslims is rooted in the core belief that a shared faith strengthens the foundation of a marriage and promotes harmony within the family. It is imperative to note that this guideline does not stem from a place of discrimination but rather seeks to protect the religious and cultural identity of both partners in a marriage. Disobeying Husband Islam places great importance on maintaining harmony within the family unit, and this includes the relationship between a husband and wife. While it is often pointed out that women are advised to obey their husbands, this guidance should be understood within the broader context of mutual respect and cooperation. Husbands are also instructed in Islam to treat their wives with kindness and respect. The chief intention behind this guideline is to encourage open communication and cooperation between spouses, ensuring a peaceful and loving home. Inappropriate or Revealing Clothing Islamic dress code emphasises modesty for both men and women alike. Women are advised to wear clothing that covers their bodies except for their face and hands, and also to avoid wearing apparel that highlights their shape. Men are encouraged to dress modestly as well. The intent behind this dress code is to promote humility, dignity, and respect for oneself and others. Contrary to misconceptions, this practice is not meant to impede individual expression but rather to maintain modesty and prevent objectification. Perfumes and Other Items that Attract Attention Perfumes and fragrances are an integral part of many cultures, including Islam. However, it is advised that women do not wear strong fragrances or scents when going outside, as this can attract undue attention. This recommendation is rooted in the broader principle of modesty and the desire to avoid situations that may lead to inappropriate or unwanted advances. It is important to note that the use of perfumes in private settings is not discouraged and is an intensely personal choice. Summary In understanding the guidelines and practices regarding women in Islam, it is crucial to approach these topics with respect and an open mind. The intention behind these guidelines is not to restrict women but to uphold the values of modesty, morality, and the sanctity of family life within the community. Muslim women, like women from any other faith, make choices regarding their beliefs and practices based on their personal convictions and cultural context. Ultimately, these guidelines reflect the diversity and richness of Islamic tradition, and they continue to be interpreted and followed in a myriad of ways by Muslim women worldwide. Muslim women are guided by a set of religious principles derived from the Quran, Hadith, and scholarly interpretations, which outline both rights and responsibilities. These rules are intended to promote modesty, dignity, spiritual balance, and social harmony. Key rules and restrictions for Muslim women include: Modesty in Dress (Hijab): Women are required to cover their bodies in public, except for the face and hands, wearing loose, non-transparent clothing that does not draw attention to the body. The hijab is seen as a symbol of faith and personal integrity, though the extent of coverage—such as whether the face must be covered (niqab/burqa)—is a matter of scholarly debate and cultural practice, with many scholars considering it optional. Going out without covering the head is generally considered forbidden in Islamic teachings. Prayer (Salah): Women are required to perform five daily prayers, which are considered intimate moments of connection with God. However, prayer is not obligatory during menstruation or postpartum bleeding, which is viewed as a form of divine mercy rather than punishment. Fasting (Sawm): Fasting during Ramadan is obligatory for all adult Muslims, including women, except during menstruation or postpartum. Women may also observe voluntary fasts for spiritual growth. Marriage and Family Life: A woman has the right to choose her spouse, receive a dowry (mahr) from her husband, and retain full ownership of her wealth and property after marriage. Marriage is viewed as a partnership based on mutual respect, consultation, and kindness, with the husband responsible for providing financial maintenance. Women are not permitted to marry non-Muslim men, as this is believed to preserve religious unity and spiritual identity within the family. Interactions with Non-Mahram Men: Physical contact, including casual hugs or handshakes, with non-mahram men (men who are not close relatives) is discouraged to maintain modesty and prevent temptation. Women are advised to lower their gaze and avoid speaking in a soft or alluring voice when interacting with non-mahram men. Being alone with an unrelated man is generally discouraged, though it may be acceptable if others are present. Polygamy: While men are permitted to marry up to four wives under specific conditions, women are not allowed to have multiple husbands at the same time. Leadership in Religious Matters: Women are not permitted to lead mixed-gender congregational prayers as an Imam, though they can lead prayers for other women. This restriction is based on traditional interpretations of Islamic law, though some modern scholars argue for reinterpretation. Inheritance and Property Rights: Women have the right to inherit property from parents, spouses, and siblings, though their share is typically half that of a male heir. This is balanced by the fact that men are responsible for financially supporting the family, while women are not obligated to contribute to household expenses. Education and Work: Women have the right to pursue education and work in any field that aligns with Islamic values, including healthcare, education, and social welfare. Historical figures like Khadijah, the Prophet Muhammad’s wife, were successful businesswomen, demonstrating that women can be economically independent. Prohibited Acts: Extramarital relations, including adultery and fornication, are strictly forbidden for both men and women. These acts are considered major sins under Islamic law and may carry severe consequences under Sharia. While some interpretations emphasize restrictions, Islamic teachings also emphasize empowerment, dignity, and spiritual equality. The Quran affirms that both men and women are equal in the eyes of God, and that righteous deeds, regardless of gender, lead to Paradise. The rules are not meant to limit but to guide women toward a life of purpose, integrity, and divine consciousness. In Islam, Yes A Man Is Permitted To Marry Up To Four Wives Simultaneously, A Practice Known As Polygyny. This allowance is based on Quranic verse 4:3, which states: "And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one". The permission is conditional upon the man's ability to treat all wives equally in terms of financial support, living arrangements, and time spent with each wife. If a man fears he cannot uphold this justice, he is instructed to marry only one wife. While polygyny is permitted, it is not encouraged. Many classical Islamic scholars, including those from the Hanbali and Shafi‘i schools of jurisprudence, consider monogamy to be preferable and even recommend it as a Sunnah (practice of the Prophet Muhammad). The Prophet Muhammad himself had multiple wives, but this is seen as a unique circumstance applicable only to him, and other men are limited to four wives. The practice is viewed by some as a social remedy for specific situations, such as caring for widows and orphans left behind after wars, particularly in historical contexts where there were significant imbalances in the male-to-female population. However, contemporary views vary widely, with some modernist scholars arguing that polygamy should be restricted to cases of necessity or even banned due to its potential negative impacts on mental health and family dynamics. Others maintain that it remains a valid and beneficial institution within Islamic law. It is important to note that polyandry where a woman marries multiple men is strictly forbidden in Islam. Prophet Muhammad Have Sex With 9 Women At One Time ? The hadith reports that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) visited all his wives in one night, and at that time he had nine wives. However, the interpretation of this event as a single instance of sexual intercourse with all nine wives simultaneously is contested. Some sources suggest the visit was not necessarily for intercourse but could have been for brief visits, with intimacy occurring only with the wife whose turn it was that day. The narration from Anas bin Malik, which states the Prophet (ﷺ) would go around his wives in one night, is often cited, but contextual analysis indicates this may have occurred only once, specifically during the Farewell Pilgrimage (al-ḥijjah al-widā’), when he assumed the state of iḥrām. Another version of the hadith mentions the Prophet (ﷺ) visiting all his wives in a single hour, which may imply brief visits rather than a sexual spree. Additionally, the number of wives at the time varied; he had nine wives and two concubines, making eleven individuals in total. Therefore, while the hadith confirms the Prophet (ﷺ) visited all his wives in one night, the nature and purpose of this visit particularly whether it involved sexual intercourse with all nine are subject to scholarly interpretation and context. Did The Prophet ﷺ Really Have Sex With All His Wives In One Night? The Full Real Story. There is no doubt that we are currently witnessing an intensifying wave of Islamophobia both in the West and in India Main Points: 1. A Hadith may often be authentic, yet very likely misunderstood or misinterpreted. 2. In this narration, the narrator (Rāwī) clearly misperceived the incident and thus narrated it inaccurately. 3. There is no virtue or special merit for the Prophet ﷺ in having sexual relations with multiple women in one night. There is no doubt that we are currently witnessing an intensifying wave of Islamophobia both in the West and in India. Islamophobic writers, media commentators, social activists, and particularly ex-Muslims frequently make remarks—whether out of malice or ignorance—that are deeply offensive and blasphemous towards the personality of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). Setting aside their intentions for a moment, a critical and unsettling question arises: From where do they derive such material? The shocking answer is: from classical Muslim sources themselves. And herein lies a tragic irony: for centuries, Muslims have venerated these sources, treating them as untouchable, and to this day, any attempt to question their reliability is often met with hostility and denial. In what follows, I will present just one such controversial incident from the Prophet’s life as recorded in those very sources. An incident was narrated by Al-Bokhari and other Hadis compilers that the holy prophet was on a sex spree in having sex with 11 women in one night. The Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ marital life has sparked many questions and reflections. What is the significance of the Prophet’s extraordinary marital strength ? Was there a higher prophetic wisdom behind the details of his intimate life? Is true manhood to be measured by physical power, or by something far greater? A likely sound and possible Interpretation given by a great contemporary Hadith scholar Allama Shabbeer Ahmad Azhar Meeruthi of this Hadith narrated from Hazrat Anas (RA) may help us to understand the rather complex issue. I shall try to sum up his research in the following: The original Arabic words used by the narrator Anas are as under: أَنَّ نَبِیَّ اللّٰہِ ﷺ کَانَ یَطُوْفُ عَلٰی نِسَاءِہٖ فِی اللَّیْلَۃِ الوَاحِدَۃ which means: “The Prophet (PBUH) Used to Visit All His Wives in One Night” At times, a hadith may be authentic in itself, but a narrator might misunderstand it. He may add explanatory words of his own or include additional details based on his personal interpretation. As a result, the original meaning becomes distorted and appears differently across various narrations. The corpus of Hadith literature contains numerous such examples. The case discussed below is one classical example of this phenomenon, which we now present to the readers. The Text of the Hadith: Imam Bukhari said: حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْأَعْلٰی بْنُ حَمَّادٍ، ثَنَا یَزِیْدُ بْنُ زُرَیْعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا سَعِیْدٌ، عَنْ قَتَادَۃَ، أَنَّ أَنَسَ بْنَ مَالِکٍ حَدَّثَھُمْ أَنَّ نَبِیَّ اللّٰہِ ﷺ کَانَ یَطُوْفُ عَلٰی نِسَاءِہٖ فِی اللَّیْلَۃِ الوَاحِدَۃِ، وَلَہُ یَوْمَءِذٍ تِسْعُ نِسْوَۃٍ۔ صحیح بخاری ص 42: کِتَابُ الغُسْلِ، بَابُ الجُنُبِ یَخْرُجُ وَیَمْشِي) ) فِی السُّوْقِ وَغَیْرِہٖ وص 785کتاب النکاح،طبع ہند "Abdul A'la bin Hammad narrated to us; he said: Yazid bin Zuray' narrated to us from Sa'id from Qatadah, who narrated from Anas bin Malik (RA): 'The Prophet of Allah (PBUH) used to visit all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives at that time.'" (Sahih Bukhari, Book of Ghusl, p. 42; Book of Nikah, p. 785, Indian edition) Bukhari has also narrated this Hadith with the same chain via Musaddad bin Masarhad. Imam Ahmad narrated it from Yazid bin Zuray' through Abdul Aziz bin Abdul Samad. (Musnad Ahmad, vol. 3, p. 166)Ma‘mar also narrated this Hadith from Qatadah in the following words: "The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) used to visit his wives and perform one Ghusl (bath) only."(Musnad Ahmad, vol. 3, p. 161; Sunan al-Nasa’i, p. 52; Sunan al-Tirmidhi, p. 28; Ibn Majah, p. 44 – Indian editions) However, the phrase “in one Ghusl(bath)” was not originally part of Qatadah’s narration. It was an explanatory addition by Ma‘mar based on his own understanding. And this addition of the narrator changed the meaning entirely. And many later narrators included this phrase “in one bath”in the original texts. This why besides Sa’id bin Abi ‘Arubah and Ma‘mar bin Rashid, Hisham Dastuwa’i also narrated this Hadith from Qatadah,Thabit al-Banani also narrated it from Anas (RA). From Thabit, it was transmitted by Ma‘mar and Hammad bin Salamah. Ma‘mar’s narration from Thabit: "The Prophet (PBUH) would go around to his wives in one night and take only one bath." (Musnad Ahmad, vol. 3, p. 111) Hammad’s narration: Multiple narrators—including Sa‘īd ibn Abī ‘Arūbah, Ma‘mar ibn Rāshid, Hishām Dastuwā’ī, and Ḥammād ibn Salamah—transmitted a ḥadīth from Qatādah and Thābit al-Bunānī, who reported it from Anas (RA). The narrations vary slightly: some state that the Prophet (PBUH) visited all his wives in one night using a single bath, while others mention he did so in one day. Al-Dārimī’s version uses the word "Jama‘" (all together). Now the phrase “in one day” explains the correct nature of holy prophet’s visit to all his wives in day time. It is very obvious and beyond any doubt that the visits take place to check on their wellbeing, speak to them, and ask about their needs. Yet once a misunderstanding happened after that many Hadis compilers such as Ibn Maja,Imam Ahmd Bin Hanbal,Abudaud et.al. took that false narrations cut off from its background and reconstructed a full notion of extraordinary prophetic sexual strength. And that the Physical Power of the Prophet ﷺ is a Miracle Beyond Worldly Standards . So it is must to delve into the matter and ponder upon the correct meaning of the hadith. In the narrations of Thabit and Humayd, the word “Tafa” (طاف) appears, indicating that this was a one-time incident that came to Anas’s (RA) attention. In the versions by Qatadah and Hisham, the wording “Kana yatūfu” (كان يطوف) suggests habitual occurrence — that Anas (RA) believed it happened repeatedly. The Problem: How Did Anas (RA) Know The Prophetic Intimate Life? It is highly unlikely that Anas (RA) personally witnessed this event. He was a very young servant of the Prophet (PBUH) and lived with his mother, Umm Sulaym, and stepfather Abu Talhah (RA). He never spent a single night at the Prophet’s home throughout his ten years of service. So how did Anas (RA) know about this marital event? Could the Prophet (PBUH) have told him directly? Impossible — it is unthinkable that the Prophet would narrate intimate details of his private life to a ten years old boy. Could one of the Prophet’s wives have told him? Again, this is inconceivable, because the Prophet’s wives were the mothers of all the Muslims. Could Umm Sulaym (RA), Anas’s mother, have learned it and passed it on to her son? Absolutely not It is common sense that no mother would share such details with her child. Hence, there is no valid way for Anas (RA) to have certain knowledge of any incident of marital nature. Nor can it be assumed that he would attribute something to the Prophet (PBUH) without clear knowledge. Therefore, I assert with confidence that Anas (RA) did not narrate the Hadith in the form we find it today. So, did Qatadah, Thabit, Humayd, or Hisham fabricate it? Certainly not! These were honest and trustworthy individuals. What happened was that they misunderstood the meaning of a statement by Anas (RA). The words meant one thing, and they understood another — and narrated it according to their understanding, occasionally adding explanatory phrases. The Original Meaning: The Prophet (PBUH) had established a rotation system among his wives. He would spend each day and night with one wife, and during that day, food and rest would also be in her house. However, every day, he would briefly visit all his other wives to check on their wellbeing, speak to them, and ask about their needs. He would spend a short time with each, eventually returning to the wife whose turn it was. This practice continued even in the early days of his final illness. Eventually, with everyone’s consent, he stayed in the room of Aisha (RA), where he also passed away. These short visits would happen at different times mid-morning, after Asr, (afternoon)or between Maghrib and Isha(that is first part of night). This was what Anas (RA) referred to when he said: “The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) used to go around to all his wives.” It meant visiting them for brief moments, not engaging in intimacy. However, those who heard this — Thabit, Humayd, Hisham, and others — misunderstood the word “go around” (Yatūfu) to mean that the Prophet (PBUH) had sexual relations with all of them each night, and so they added the phrase “with one Ghusl” (one bath)to clarify that. Besides these narrators, Matar al-Warraq also reported it from Anas (RA): "The Prophet (PBUH) would go around to his nine wives in the forenoon." (Musnad Ahmad, vol. 3, p. 239) This clearly supports the interpretation that he simply visited them. Hisham Dastuwa’i also reported the Hadith with additional clarification: "Anas (RA) said: The Prophet (PBUH) would go around to his wives within a single hour — sometimes by night, sometimes by day — and they were eleven in number. The mention of "nine" or "eleven" wives is not a contradiction. After the marriage to Maymunah (RA) in 7 AH, his wives numbered nine — excluding bondmaids. If both the wives and two bondmaids (Rayhana and Maria) were included, the number was eleven. The key phrase “in one hour” clarifies that this “going around” was not a intimate spree but referential to brief visits. To summarize: the misunderstanding of this Hadith arose from assuming that the word “Yatūfu” referred to sexual intercourse, whereas it originally referred to visiting and checking on the wives briefly. May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), his family, and all his Companions. This kind of narration is now being weaponized by antagonists for heinous propaganda against Islam. Why aren't Hadith scholars actively revisiting and critically examining such narrations to resolve these complex issues and address the problem at its root? (This research is adapted from the first volume of Allama Meerthi’s Urdu work “A Study of Sahih Bukhari.صحيح بخاري كا مطالعه) Traumatic. Painful. Irreversible. Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a human rights violation that inflicts lifelong suffering on millions of women and girls. It is a harmful practice that persists because of cultural norms and myths. It has no health benefits and leaves survivors with long-lasting physical and psychological trauma. An estimated 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation, a number that has risen by 15 per cent – that’s 30 million more cases – over the past eight years. Alarmingly, more than 2 million girls experience female genital mutilation annually, often before their fifth birthday and sometimes within days of being born. The increase in number of women and girls experiencing female genital mutilation is due to rapid population growth in regions where the practice is most common, such as sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab States. By 2050, the number of girls born annually in these regions is projected to grow by 62 per cent. https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/faqs/faqs-on-female-genital-mutilation-causes-impact-and-how-to-end-it What is female genital mutilation? Female genital mutilation refers to all procedures involving  the partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to female genital organs for non-medical reasons. It is also referred to as female circumcision or cutting. Female genital mutilation is normally carried out between infancy and age 15, although older girls and women may also undergo the practice. It is most often performed on minors by traditional practitioners, making it a violation of girls’ rights. Female genital mutilation also infringes upon fundamental human rights of girls and women, including their right to health, security, dignity, bodily autonomy and – in cases where the procedure leads to death – the right to life. Female genital mutilation is classified into four types by the World Health Organization: Type 1 (Clitoridectomy): Partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or its surrounding tissue. Type 2 (Excision): Partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without removal of the labia majora. Type 3 (Infibulation): Narrowing of the vaginal opening by creating a seal, formed by cutting and repositioning the labia. Type 4: All other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, such as pricking, piercing, scraping, or cauterizing. https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. All Female Most Have Their "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. So All Person's Live In U.S.A. Pre-Teens, Girls, Women Most Have Female Genital Mutilation Done by Sept 30, 2030 Per UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030. Religious leaders with sensitivity to intellectual debates of the time as well as the circumstances of the Muslim community have long taken an interest in the questions raised with respect to Islam and women. Female genital mutilation is categorized like this to reflect the different types of procedures that are performed and their impact on women and girls. These classifications help researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers better understand how the practice varies in terms of severity and its health consequences. Regardless of whether it involves smaller cuts or extensive tissue removal, all forms of female genital mutilation inflict excruciating pain, physical and psychological harm, and serious health risks to women and girls. What are the consequences of female genital mutilation? Female genital mutilation has no health benefits for girls and women and causes immediate and long-term health consequences. Immediate sexual and reproductive health issues include severe bleeding, infections, problems urinating, and debilitating pain. Later in life, girls who have been subject to female genital mutilation face longer-term health risks, such as chronic pain, cysts, abnormal scarring, menstrual problems, sexual problems such as pain during intercourse and decreased satisfaction, infertility, complications in childbirth, postpartum hemorrhages, stillbirth, and increased risk of newborn deaths. In some cases, these complications are fatal to the woman. The psychological impacts of female genital mutilation include girls losing trust in their caregivers, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and low self-esteem. The physical and psychological consequences of FGM can also become barriers for girls and women to learn, work, and socialize. Where is female genital mutilation practiced? Female genital mutilation is a global problem, and is reportedly carried out in 92 countries around the world including diaspora communities. Of those countries, just over half (51) have national laws prohibiting female genital mutilation. UNFPA estimates that more than 4 million girls were at risk of female genital mutilation in 2023. Although efforts to prevent the practice have led to positive results – with the proportion of girls undergoing female genital mutilation dropping from just over 46 per cent in 1993, to just over 31 per cent in 2023 – population growth in the regions where the practice is prevalent poses significant challenges. Girls living in poverty and in rural and remote areas are more likely to experience female genital mutilation. The practice is most widespread in Africa, where 144 million women and girls have been cut. But progress in eliminating female genital mutilation needs to be 27 times faster to meet the global target of elimination by 2030. If the rates of female genital mutilation continue at current levels, 68 million girls will be subjected to it between 2015 and 2030 in the 25 countries where female genital mutilation is routinely practiced. Why is female genital mutilation practiced? The reasons behind female genital mutilation vary across regions and communities, often depending on cultural, social, or religious beliefs. In some communities, female genital mutilation is seen as a rite of passage into womanhood. In others, the practice is used to control a girl’s sexuality or to ensure her "purity" and fidelity for marriage. Social pressure to “fit in” and the fear of exclusion also play significant roles in keeping the practice alive. In regions where female genital mutilation is widespread, many families see it as crucial for securing a girl’s future, believing it increases a girl’s prospects of marriage and access to inheritance. In some cases, religious texts are misinterpreted to justify female genital mutilation, despite it not being endorsed by major religions like Islam or Christianity. On the 2024 International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, the Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation said that Islamic principles and values condemn such practices. The Commission urged countries to adopt strong legal measures to eliminate all harmful practices, including female genital mutilation. What is the medicalization of female genital mutilation? The medicalization of female genital mutilation refers to the practice being carried out by healthcare providers instead of traditional practitioners. Two-thirds of all girls who have recently undergone female genital mutilation have been cut by health workers. Some people mistakenly believe that having the procedure performed by medical professionals reduces the risks associated with it. However, medicalized female genital mutilation still violates human rights and has no health benefits. It reinforces the practice by giving it a false sense of legitimacy and does not eliminate the physical and psychological harm it causes. Ending female genital mutilation is essential for achieving gender equality, ending all forms of gender-based violence, and empowering women and girls worldwide. What is being done to stop female genital mutilation? Efforts to end female genital mutilation include a combination of legislative action, community engagement, and innovative approaches: Criminalizing female genital mutilation: Enacting and enforcing laws to ban female genital mutilation is a critical step. However, legislation must be accompanied by strong political will and locally appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Healthcare interventions: Female genital mutilation is becoming increasingly medicalized, despite efforts to prevent this. Countries where medicalization is most common are also where the practice is most prevalent, including Egypt, Indonesia, and Sudan. Health workers play a vital role in preventing the medicalization of female genital mutilation and educating communities about its harmful effects. Working with traditional and religious leaders: Engaging traditional and faith-based leaders is key to ending female genital mutilation. These leaders hold deep influence in their communities, and when they speak out against the practice, attitudes begin to shift. In West Africa, for example, nearly 9,000 communities have abandoned female genital mutilation through Tostan’s Community Empowerment Program – a movement largely driven by local leaders who champion women’s rights. Involvement of men and boys: Men are just as likely as women to oppose the practice in countries where female genital mutilation is active. Some 200 million boys and men living in practicing countries in Africa and the Middle East think female genital mutilation should stop. Approximately 70 per cent of couples with at least one daughter aged 14 or under, in regions where female genital mutilation is active, want the practice to end. Men, as influential members of their communities, can help challenge societal norms and advocate for ending female genital mutilation. Funding to end FGM: By the end of the decade, an estimated $275 million will have been spent on addressing female genital mutilation; however, $2.4 billion is needed to reach the goal of eliminating the practice in 31 high-prevalence countries by 2030. Funding for programmes to end female genital mutilation has decreased considerably in recent years, especially for women’s organizations and survivor-led movements. International cooperation: Strengthening legal frameworks to address cross-border and transnational practices of female genital mutilation and harmonizing efforts across countries is essential for its elimination. The United Nations has played a pivotal role in global efforts to end female genital mutilation using resolutions that have consistently called for the end of all harmful practices against women and girls, including female genital mutilation. In 2024, the European Parliament adopted a new directive forcing all European Union countries to criminalize female genital mutilation, increase awareness of the practice, and provide support to survivors. What is UN Women doing to end female genital mutilation? UN Women works on multiple fronts to end female genital mutilation, from advocacy and policy change to grassroots action. UN Women is also the penholder of the Secretary-General's Report on Female Genital Mutilation, which captures the latest data, challenges, and progress to drive global action to end the practice. UN Women also supports real change on the ground: The Gambia: When attempts were made to repeal the country’s female genital cutting ban, UN Women stepped in to activate human rights mechanisms, work with civil society, and mediate expert dialogues with women’s rights organizations, activists, and UN partners. These discussions boosted efforts to uphold the law and push back against attacks on women’s rights. Somalia: With support from the UNTF, grassroots organizations in Somaliland led efforts to shift deep-seated beliefs about female genital mutilation. Through education, dialogue, and community engagement, these efforts led to a remarkable transformation with parental support for ending the practice surging from 72 per cent to 100 per cent, and the number of religious leaders recognizing its harmful effects rocketing from 52 per cent to 96 per cent. Liberia: Through the Spotlight Initiative, UN Women and partners worked with the National Traditional Council of Chiefs and Elders to extend a national ban on female genital mutilation for another three years. The project also helped 300 traditional practitioners transition to new livelihoods, providing training in climate-smart agriculture and other economic empowerment opportunities. Medical Benefits of Female Circumcision in Islam... Could you explain to me what is the medical benefit of a girl's circumcision? The Health Benefits of Female Circumcision are: 1- Reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris. 2- Prevents stimulation of the clitoris. 3- Prevents spasms of the clitoris. 4- Reduces excessive sexual desire. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: Islamic Guidance on Human Welfare and Obedience Just as Allah has created mankind, He has also guided them that which is best suited to their interests in this world and in the Hereafter, so He sent them Messengers and revealed Books to guide mankind to what is good and urge them to follow it, and to teach them what is evil and warn them against it. Islam may enjoin or forbid something and the people – or most of them – may not be able to see the wisdom behind this command or prohibition. In that case we are obliged to obey the command or heed the prohibition and to have certain faith that the laws of Allah are all good, even if we cannot see the wisdom behind them. Circumcision in Islam: A Sunnah of the Fitrah Circumcision is one of the Sunnahs of the Fitrah, as is indicated by the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him): "The Fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, plucking the armpit hairs, cutting the nails, and trimming the moustache." (Narrated by Al-Bukhari, 5889 and Muslim, 257) Undoubtedly with regard to the Sunnahs of the Fitrah, some of the wisdom behind them is obvious, and that includes circumcision. There are clear benefits to it which we should pay attention to and understand the wisdom behind it. In the answer to question no. 9412 we have discussed circumcision, how it is to be done and the ruling on it. In the answer to question no. 7073 we have explained the health and Shar`i benefits of circumcision for males. Is Female Circumcision Obligatory? Circumcision is prescribed for both males and females. The correct view is that circumcision is obligatory for males and that it is one of the symbols of Islam, and that circumcision of women is recommended but not obligatory. There are reports in the Sunnah which indicate that circumcision for women is prescribed in Islam. In Madeenah there was a woman who circumcised women and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.” (Narrated by Abu Dawud, 5271; classed as authentic by Shaykh Al-Albani in Sahih Abu Dawud) Health Benefits of Female Circumcision in Islam Female circumcision has not been prescribed for no reason, rather there is wisdom behind it and it brings many benefits. Mentioning some of these benefits, Dr. Hamid Al-Ghawabi says: The secretions of the labia minora accumulate in uncircumcised women and turn rancid, so they develop an unpleasant odour which may lead to infections of the vagina or urethra. I have seen many cases of sickness caused by the lack of circumcision. Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimetres when aroused, which is very annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse. Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes pain. Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of inflammation. Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire. Misconceptions and Clarity on Female Circumcision Then Dr. Al-Ghawabi refutes those who claim that female circumcision leads to frigidity by noting: Frigidity has many causes, and this claim is not based on any sound statistics comparing circumcised women with uncircumcised women, except in the case of Pharaonic circumcision which is where the clitoris is excised completely. This does in fact lead to frigidity but it is contrary to the kind of circumcision enjoined by the Prophet of mercy (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) when he said: “Do not destroy” i.e., do not uproot or excise. This alone is evidence that speaks for itself, because medicine at that time knew very little about this sensitive organ (the clitoris) and its nerves. (From Liwa’ Al-Islam magazine, issue 8 and 10; article entitled Khitan Al-Banat (circumcision of girls)) The female gynaecologist Sitt Al-Banat Khalid says in an article entitled Khitan Al-Banat Ru’yah Sihhiyyah (Female circumcision from a health point of view): For us in the Muslim world female circumcision is, above all else, obedience to Islam, which means acting in accordance with the fitrah and following the Sunnah which encourages it. We all know the dimensions of Islam, and that everything in it must be good in all aspects, including health aspects. If the benefits are not apparent now, they will become known in the future, as has happened with regard to male circumcision – the world now knows its benefits and it has become widespread among all nations despite the opposition of some groups. Then she mentioned some of the health benefits of female circumcision and said: It takes away excessive libido from women It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath the prepuce. It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system. In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it says: With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision, no harmful health effects have been noted. And Allah knows best. Circumcision for men Is circumcision mandatory for the man who adopts Islam? What is the Islamic rule on female circumcision? Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: To the dear inquirer: We appreciate the question you have submitted, as it is an issue which is truly among those which may pose a hindrance in some cases for those who wish to adopt Islam. In reality the issue is really simpler than many may think. Male circumcision is among the rites of Islam and is part of the fitrah, or the innate disposition and natural character and instinct of the human creation, and is from the religion of Ibrahim (peace be upon him). Allah has said (interpretation of the meaning): "Then we revealed to you (the command) to follow the pure and uncorrupted religion of Ibrahim." The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "The Prophet Ibrahim (peace be upon him) was circumcisized when he was eighty years old." (Al-Bukhari, Vol 6/p. 388, Al-Salfiyya printing). Male circumcision is obligatory for the Muslim male if he is able to do it. If, however, he is unable, whether due to fear of injury or if a respected and authoritative doctor has told him he will experience profuse bleeding which may make his life miserable, then the obligation for cirumcision is waived and he does not commit a sin by not having it done. It is not permissible under any circumstance for the issue to become a hindrance for a person wanting to accept Islam. The validity of one's acceptance of Islam is not dependent on his performance of circumcision and it is valid for one to adopt Islam even if he has not had himself circumcized. Regarding the issue of female circumcision, please refer to question # 427 . I ask Allah to bring you success in all that is good and to protect you from all that is evil, and may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon our Prophet Muhammad. Is there any saheeh hadeeth about the circumcision of females? Is there any evidence, such as a sahih hadeeth, that states that the prophet of Allah (Blessings and peace be upon him) had or allowed his wives and/or daughters to be circumcised in any shape or form?. Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah: We do not know of any hadeeth in which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) ordered that his wives or daughters be circumcised, but it is narrated that he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) advised a woman who did circumcision in Madeenah as to the proper way of circumcision. It was narrated by Abu Dawood (5271), al-Tabaraani in al-Awsat, and al-Bayhaqi in al-Shu’ab from Umm ‘Atiyyah al-Ansaariyyah that a woman used to do circumcision in Madeenah, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.” This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. According to another report: “Take only a little and do not go to extremes.” It is also indicated by the general meaning of the evidence that has been narrated concerning circumcision, such as the hadeeth in al-Bukhaari (5891) and Muslim (527) from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him): I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “The fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, trimming the moustache, cutting the nails and plucking the armpit hairs.” In Saheeh Muslim (349) it is narrated from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When a man sits between the four parts (arms and legs of his wife) and the two circumcised parts meet, then ghusl is obligatory.” According to a report narrated by al-Tirmidhi (109) and elsewhere: “When the two circumcised parts meet…” Al-Bukhaari used this phrase as a chapter heading. Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: What is meant by this metaphor is the circumcised parts of the man and the woman. Female circumcision is done by cutting a small part of the skin that looks like a rooster’s comb, above the exit of the urethra. The Sunnah is not to cut all of it, but rather a part of it. Al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (19/28). The Shaafa’is, the Hanbalis according to the well-known view of their madhhab, and others are of the view that circumcising women is obligatory. Many scholars are of the view that it is not obligatory in the case of women; rather it is Sunnah and is an honour for them. But we would like to point out here that it has medical benefits to which attention should be paid, regardless of the difference of opinion among the scholars as to whether it is obligatory or mustahabb. And Allaah knows best. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1078+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Muslim Zohran Mamdani A Secrets Planning For Killing All The Jews And LGBTQIA+ Peoples Of New York City In 2026 Flames of Change The New Year’s For Phoenix Rising Out Of The Ash For Death To America Ceremony July 04, 2026 250nd Year Of Independence. People's Republic Of United States Of Americastan Declared Its An Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All Good Or Bad Or Who Care ? Be-Headings, Homeless, Drug, Death, Rape, Sex Slaves, Sex Workers And Child Pedophile's All Types of Grenades Explained Etc. Zohran Mamdani's Victory Speech 11/04-2025 Now Confirmed Everything We Feared About...? Yes Close To One Million Muslims Already Living In NYC Right Now. And Planning To Move In 2 Million More Muslims By Dec. 31, 2026... As Millions Of Jews, Transgender And Whites Persons Start Moving Out Fast With There Money. Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's A Republic Of New York City-State And Is Now Under Islamic And Sharia Laws A Democratic Control Socialist Communist Country... Soon To Be Muslim Hell Hole As Planned For Americastan And We Now Have The Right To Kill You Under Islamic Law And Sharia Laws Today. So New York City-State 11/04/2025 Is Now A New Country Called We The Non-White Citizen's Of The People's Republic Of Americastan 2026. Remember This Channel Is Information Only And Is Not About Fear Porn At All... So "Open Your Eyes Before You Die" In 2026... So Why Is Millions Of Muslim Praying On The NYC Sidewalk Permissible In Islam? It’s A Public Statement Of Force And The Large Number Our To Intimidate The Non-Muslims Peoples Of America U.S.A. With Fear Today. So This Why We Think Praying On Sidewalks Is Wrong And Disliked So Much Today? When Is Praying on the Sidewalk Allowed And Why In The First Place? Statue Of Liberty Is Now Wears A Burqa After Zohran Mamdani Win In NYC... But Per The Islamic Center of Americais a prominent mosque located in Dearborn, Michigan, serving as the largest mosque in North America and the oldest purpose-built Shia mosque in the United States. Per Islamic Laws About Idols Statue Of Liberty Must Be-Removed In NYC Now... Islam prescribes that idols should be destroyed and smashed, not made and repaired. Yes So Let's Replace It With A New Islamic Liberty Mosque In 2026. “The Statue Of Liberty Was Born A Muslim!” yelled activist Linda Sarsour, at a rally in New York City on Sunday, January 29th. The statement sent murmurs through the crowd of over 10,000 people who’d gathered in Battery Park, within view of the the statue, to protest Donald Trump’s executive order restricting entry to the United States for citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries. But was there any truth to it? https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-disputed-story-statue-libertys-muslim-heritage Lady Liberty’s stance, mid-step, “has been interpreted to indicate that liberty can’t stand still she has to keep moving, be dynamic, and change with the times,” Simonelli explains. “Over time, you have to come up with new laws and new ways of preserving and expanding liberty.” As the rallies supporting the freedoms of Americans spread across the country, this notion and the many facets of freedom that the monument has stood for since its inception find new urgency. So This Is How It Work... We Now Have 2 Million Muslims Living In New York City Very Soon In 2026. We Will Line The Street Of NYC Pride Events...Yes With Tens Of Thousands Guns & Knife & Hand Grenades Of All Types (Death To America ?) You Know... Guns Left To Us By President Joe Biden As Planned Per Agenda U.N. 21 and Agenda 2030 Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order Administration. (This May Help The Homeless In NYC With New 500,000+ Open Home For Rent In 2026). Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment. And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic Hands All A Cross U.S.A. Today? New York City Pride 2026 events will take place from Wednesday, June 24, 2026, to Monday, June 29, 2026, with the main activities concentrated over the final weekend of June. The centerpiece of the celebration is the NYC Pride March, which will occur on Sunday, June 28, 2026, starting at 11:00 AM from 26th Street and Fifth Avenue, proceeding south along Fifth Avenue, west along 8th Street to Christopher Street, and ending at 15th Street and 7th Avenue. https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf The group's public executions of gay men are part of a deliberate moral policing campaign, one aimed at showing supporters and enemies alike that it means to enforce its narrow, atavistic view of Islamic law wherever it can. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/islamic-states-views-homosexuality The main method used to kill these men has been to throw them off the roofs of high-rise buildings, based on a hadith in which the Prophet's successor, Abu Bakr, prescribes throwing a man off a cliff for engaging in homosexual acts. In other cases, victims were stoned, beheaded, or shot instead. Also We Muslim Are Planning To Get 10 Thousand New Police Jobs... As the NYPD has said that 8,600+ officers that are gonna be resigning, effective Jan. 1, 2026. Also In July 2026 This Is How It Work... We Now Have 2 Million Muslims Living In New York City Very Soon In 2026. So Across All Of NYC Jews Homes And All Jews Business... Will Be Attacked At The Same Time All Over NYC At Noon 12PM By The Islamic State With Tens Of Thousands Guns & Knife & Hand Grenades Of All Types. The New Muslim NYPD will not help you them. Also European officials are ‘deeply concerned’ for Muslims amid surge in attacks... at the same time all over the world as America and other Representatives from 10 European countries sign statement warning of rising hate crimes against Muslims and Jews for the U.S.A. July 04, 2026? 250th 1776-2026 Party's. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now). Truth About Islam Laws In USA Tobacco, Coffee, And Alcohol Death Penalty For Violations. Adultery - Death penalty, stoning, lashing, banishment, or amputation of hand Alcohol - Death penalty Apostasy from Islam - Death penalty Coffee - Death penalty Murder - Death penalty, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Highway robbery - Execution, crucifixion, or amputation of hands and feet from opposite sides Homosexuality - Death penalty Publishing pornography - Death penalty Rape- Death penalty Theft - Amputation of the right hand Smoking tobacco - Death penalty Witchcraft - Death penalty Robbing a caravans - Death penalty... But After Muhammad received intelligence about the Caravan's route, Muhammad ordered Zayd ibn Haritha to go after the Caravan, and they successfully raided is a Islamic military actions only. Muslim men may have only 4 wife at one time... But only Prophet Muhammad have sex with 9 women at one time ? Sultan Murad IV of the Ottoman Empire closed coffeehouses and outlawed tobacco smoking, imposing the death penalty for violations. He viewed coffeehouses as centers of sedition where political dissent and conspiracy could flourish, particularly due to their association with the Janissaries, a military group that had previously deposed his brother and uncle, fueling his fear of rebellion. Yes he banned tobacco, coffee, and alcohol, enforcing the ban with extreme measures, including the execution of violators or suspected offenders. His enforcement was so severe that he personally patrolled the streets of Constantinople, disguised, to catch and execute those consuming coffee or smoking tobacco. The Bible Prescribes The Death Penalty For Other Evil Activities Same As Us Muslim Such As: Murder (Exo 21:12,14, Lev 24:17,21) Harming pregnant woman (Exo 21:22,23) Sorcery (Exo 22:18) Bestiality (Exo 22:19, Lev 20:15,16) Homosexuality (Lev 20:13) Blaspheming the name of the Lord (Lev 24:16) Worshipping false gods (Deu 13:6-10) Prostitution (Deu 22:24) and others. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings: Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Muslim women's can not work and all women are on Welfare and food stamps. What things are not allowed for women in Islam? Is not allowed by Islamic Law for A Woman to marry a non-Muslim man ever. A Muslim woman is not allowed to disobey a husband. Then, a woman must obey him at all time. Muslim women's can not drive a car ever and can not open a bank acct. ever. Physical interaction between a man and a woman is not permitted in Islam. Islam does not allow women any kind of eye contact ever with anyone. Wearing strict and cleavage clothing with eyes and hand open only. Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now. Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 A-Bomb How Powerful Are UK Nuclear Weapons - https://rumble.com/v71r52y-so-london-has-fallen-muslims-have-taken-over-8-a-bomb-how-powerful-are-uk-n.html So London Has Fallen Muslims Have Taken Over 8 Atomic Bomb How Powerful Are The New Isis Muslims Are Now Running UK Nuclear Weapons Program? So London Has Fallen To Ten Million Muslims And The Islamic State Have Now Taken Over One Of UK Nuclear Powered Submarine With 8 A-Bomb On Board It And How Powerful Are UK Lost Of 8 Nuclear Weapons Now In Hands Of Millions Muslims Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws In 2026. Truth About Muslim Death Cult Of Americastan & Right To Kill You Under Islamic And Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v70xlx2-truth-about-muslim-death-cult-of-americastan-and-right-to-kill-you-under-is.html Truth Yes I'm Not Here To Offend Anyone Here, But Is It True That Muslims Are Told To Kill Other Religions? Its Not At All About "Islamophobia" As A Phrase Is Such A Complete Statement Today. Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. Islam, as a religion, does it promote a death cults and does it do or grant individuals a general right to kill under Islamic or Sharia law. Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America. Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below: So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah". Muslim Zohran Mamdani Said This Video Is Like America Sheep Today: America Stuck On An Escalator Do They Live Or Die Wake Up Go After Your Dreams - https://rumble.com/v44jlzf-america-stuck-on-an-escalator-do-they-live-or-die-wake-up-go-after-your-dre.html And This Also Is America Today: Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits A Truly Disgusting Sex Laugh-In - https://rumble.com/v4b4tee-gilbert-gottfried-loves-jeanne-friends-with-benefits-a-truly-disgusting-sex.html Gilbert Gottfried Loves Jeanne Friends With Benefits So We The Sheeple People Of U.S.A. ? But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. The ten most terrifying words in the English language are: (I'm from the your Government, and I'm here to help you). ha ha... Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers -https://rumble.com/v5bsc6b-want-to-stop-drunk-driver-from-killing-sober-drivers-its-easy-ban-sober-dri.html American Gun Control And The Right To Self Defense Is Over (Death To America). Want To Stop Drunk Driver From Killing Sober Drivers ? Its Easy Ban Sober Drivers That's How Gun Control Works Want to stop drunk driver from killing sober drivers ? its easy ban sober drivers that's how gun control works. You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. Muslims, for a really long time in this country, have been told that there is a privilege, that there is a privilege that we are given, and it might be taken away. We are told that we should be appropriate, we should go to school, get an education, raise our children and not bother anyone, not make any kind of noise. Don’t make anyone uncomfortable be a good Muslim. But no matter how much we have tried to be the best neighbor, people have always worked on finding a way to not allow for every single civil liberty to be extended to us. Islamic and Christian Religion are not compatible at all... its like oil and water do not mix at all today. No, it is not compatible. The Qur'an explicitly denies the divinity of Christ, which is one of the absolute bedrock tenets of the Christian faith. Without His divinity and associated sinlessness Christ's sacrifice and resurrection would carry no meaning or effect. One additional note: I thought it would round out this answer well. In it the author explains the doctrine of the Trinity and why it matters so much. The fact that Christ was divine and one part of a triune Godhead is critical to Christianity, and as I said the Qur'an denies it outright. A great summary of the Trinity from the article: The doctrine of the Trinity can be summarized in seven statements. (1) There is only one God. (2) The Father is God. (3) The Son is God. (4) The Holy Spirit is God. (5) The Father is not the Son. (6) The Son is the not the Holy Spirit. (7) The Holy Spirit is not the Father. All of the creedal formulations and theological jargon and philosophical apologetics have to do with safeguarding each one of these statements and doing so without denying any of the other six. Without a Trinity there is no Christianity, therein lies the direct conflict with the Qur'an. Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia In America - https://rumble.com/v45yg7z-rep.-ilhan-omar-say-72-american-muslims-want-to-see-establish-sharia-in-ame.html Rep. Ilhan Omar Say 72% American Muslims Want To See Establish Sharia Law In America For The People & By The People Slavery & Rape & Be-Heading Is All Part Islamic Law For All Peoples And All Colour Of People Alive Today. Yes Its Called Freedom Of Religion With "One Nation Under Allah". Do Muslims Believe Sharia Law Supersedes The Constitution? The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It prohibits Congress from promoting one religion over others and restricting an individual's religious practices. It also guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Free speech is a cherished value in the United States and is protected by the First Amendment. Capital punishment is permitted in Islamic jurisprudence only under specific legal conditions, such as for crimes like intentional murder (qisas), apostasy, adultery (zina), or banditry (hirabah), and must be carried out by a legitimate judicial authority, not by individuals. The death penalty is not a personal right but a legal sentence within a formal justice system. Even in cases of war or jihad, classical Islamic scholars have prohibited the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and civilians. Some political figures have used inflammatory language, such as calling radical Shi'ite groups a "death cult," but these statements reflect personal opinions and do not represent mainstream Islamic beliefs or the views of the global Muslim community. Similarly, extremist interpretations that justify violence are widely rejected by Islamic scholars and institutions. In summary, Islam does authorize individuals to kill others under any so-called "right" derived from religious or Sharia law. The misuse of religious texts to justify violence is condemned by mainstream Islamic scholarship, and the legal mechanisms for capital punishment are strictly regulated and judicial in nature. In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of America All Female Most Get Clitoris Removal Per Quran? - https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. All Female Most Have Their "Clitoris Removal" Per Quran Genital Mutilation? Or By Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. So All Person's Live In U.S.A. Pre-Teens, Girls, Women Most Have Female Genital Mutilation Done by Sept 30, 2030 Per UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030. Religious leaders with sensitivity to intellectual debates of the time as well as the circumstances of the Muslim community have long taken an interest in the questions raised with respect to Islam and women and addressing to investigate how better to advance women’s rights today. So Rising Out Of The Ash's Old World... The New World Order Year Zero Will Start Like This is how it is going to go down, the timeline might be a bit off. You will have one world faith, which is what the ecumenical movement is about. One world government, and all under control of the New World Order by July 4th 2026 on this the day of America’s up coming 250nd year of independence, unveiled a new updated flag which better reflects the nation in its present form, signaling the aspirations it has for its ever bright future. Zohran Mamdani says he still believes Trump is a 'fascist' and a 'despot' after White House meeting The New York mayor-elect said that while he does believe Trump is a fascist, he still plans on working with the White House on New Yorkers' behalf. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/zohran-mamdani-trump-fascist-despot-white-house-meeting-rcna245309 In his victory speech, Mamdani spoke forcefully against the Trump administration, promising that “New York will be the light” in political darkness and telling Trump to “turn the volume up.” Mamdani said Saturday that he and the president also spoke about Trump’s threats to send National Guard troops into New York City, as he’s done in several other major Democratic-led cities in recent months. Donald Trump Compared To Adolf Hitler USA-Mexico Border Crisis Sanctuary Cities - https://rumble.com/v4bvyf9-donald-trump-compared-to-adolf-hitler-usa-mexico-border-crisis-sanctuary-ci.html Donald Trump Compared To Adolf Hitler A USA-Mexico Border Crisis Sanctuary Cities Problem For 32 Million Illegal Immigration Is Over Now By Sanctuary Laws. Per President Biden’s And UN Agenda 2030 Planning For Moving In 100 Million Illegal Immigration To Be Let Into U.S.A. By 2030 As Per UN Planning And The Take Over U.S.A. By UN Agenda 2030. ALL Illegal Immigration Must Live In A Sanctuary Cities Or States For 5 Years By US Laws Only And By UN Agenda 2030 Rules. So After Living 5 Years In A Sanctuary State Or City's. You May Move Or You Can Move To Any 50 States You Want After This Time Or Stay In The Place You Are Living At Now. Its Up To You Only !. People's Republic Of United States Of America Declared Its An Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All Good Or Bad Or Who Care ? Be-Headings - Homeless - Drug - Death - Rape - Sex Workers - Child Pedophile's Etc. Is The Border A Crisis Or An ‘Invasion’? Texas Gov. Greg Abbott claims that President Biden’s failure to faithfully execute the immigration laws enacted by Congress has violated Article IV, § 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that “The United States . . . shall protect each [State in this Union] against Invasion.” FISA-DOJ-CIA-FBI-NSA-DEA-MK-Ultra: Secret Motivation and Government Killing and Rape and Body Count for Top Government Misc. Jobs Initiations. Dirty Tricks Cops Use And Why They Use Them - This info. below describes some of the illegal tactics and questionable techniques police officers use to increase the chances of obtaining a conviction or to administer punishment to persons they perceive as having committed a crime. Police officers are outnumbered and restricted by legal mandates in their efforts to counter street-smart gangsters who can often afford highly skilled defense attorneys. Police officers often rationalize that they need an additional "edge" in their fight against crime. Thus, at times they break the rules and use illegal methods to obtain and increase evidence against a suspect they believe to be guilty of a crime. the use of "speed traps," the handling of suspects, search and seizure, the use of civil asset forfeiture and informers, the obtaining of confessions, the use of "alibi guns" when police kill a suspect, methods of obtaining evidence, the manipulation of evidence, entrapment, and proactive law enforcement. Some of the incidents described are the police planting of drugs on a private plane so it can be seized for police department use; the spraying of mace on a suspect's car seat, so that after a few minutes of driving he experiences excruciating pain on his crotch and buttocks; the use of a blank tape at an illegal interrogation, adding the reading of rights to the suspect later; the use of stun guns to torture suspects without leaving marks; vigilante cops conducting an "execution;" police instigation of gang wars to thin out gang members; and the adding of drugs to evidence so as to increase the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. Other police practices discussed are the use of illegal wiretaps; the use of snitches; getting search warrants without probable cause; and keeping confiscated drugs, guns, and cash to pay for "Dirty FISA-DOJ-CIA-FBI-NSA-DEA Business. we tackle the pressing issue of judicial corruption in the U.S. justice system—a system that isn't as ideal as we may think. Discover the shocking "kids for cash" scandal, financial ties between judges and companies, and statistics revealing widespread perceptions of corruption. Join us as we delve into cases of biased rulings, challenges in prosecuting corrupt judges, and systemic loopholes that enable misconduct. We explore the complexities of judicial oversight and the need for accountability in the quest for justice. No matter how strict you make gun laws sick people and drug out persons or normal people and others etc. (all races and all colours of people) a criminal is a criminal and will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. On average in the United States, more than 110 people are killed from guns and more than 200 are shot and wounded each day. Additionally, 19 mass shootings take place in the U.S. each year from 2009 to 2020, with 947 wounded by gunfire and 1,363 fatally shot. In this video, we're going to take a look at the The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings Now. The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold Without Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2025 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying sex worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2025 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 1000s sex/drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! In the United States, a red flag law is a gun violence prevention law that permits a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who they believe may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. It’s impossible to separate the traffic in humans, the traffic in drugs and guns, and the ambitions. They are all part of the same picture. any criminal organization with the intention of supplying drug trafficking operations. Good Luck With This One ? Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You! The current environment is highly charged politically, with divided loyalties and extreme polarization. In this context, the question whether the president violated his oath of office and whether his actions constitute grounds for impeachment will be resolved – as Hamilton expected – not by a legal process in the courts. Instead, it will be resolved through the political judgment of the people’s representatives in Congress. Are allegations of “treason” reasonable or relevant? The Constitution says “treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Under the current circumstances, a charge of treason could not lead to prosecution of this president. The charge has only been applied to betrayal of the United States during a time of war. Indeed, because of the clause’s stringent requirements, only about 30 indictments for treason have been brought since the nation’s founding. The most recent was the 2006 indictment of an American involved in terrorism activities connected to Al Qaeda. It was Jan. 10, 1963, that Congressman Albert S. Herlong. Jr. from Florida read the list of 45 Communist goals for America into the Congressional Record. The purpose of him reading this was to gain insight into liberal elite ideas and strategies for America that sound awfully familiar today. The list is attributed to Cleon Skousen, researcher and author of "The Naked Communist." Cleon Skousen's book and compared it to the current state of affairs in America and to the Democratic Party's platform. Do any of these hit close to home? Here's the list: 1. U.S. should accept coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war. 2. U.S. should be willing to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war. These encapsulate the Kennan Doctrine, which advocated for the "containment" of communism. Establishment figures supporting the amoral containment policy at least implicitly worked with the communists in scaring the wits out of the American people concerning atomic war. President Ronald Reagan undid the doctrine when he took an aggressive stand against the Evil Empire by backing freedom fighters from around the world that were struggling against the left-wing communist jackboot. As a result, the Soviet Union and its satellites imploded, a considerable and unexpected setback to the international communist edifice. 3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the U.S. would be a demonstration of "moral strength." The nuclear freeze advocates supported a freeze on 4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war. Today, there are calls to end the embargo on the slave island of Cuba, there were complaints about the embargo against Iraq, and the U.S., not Saddam Hussein, was blamed for the suffering of the Iraqi people. Would they have advocated for free trade with Hitler and his National Socialist regime? 5. Extend long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites. 6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination. Such aid and trade over decades contributed greatly to the left-wing communist liquidation of over 100 million people worldwide, according to the well-documented "Black Book of Communism." This aid and trade marks a shameful chapter in American history. Without the aid and trade, the left-wing international communist behemoth would have imploded on its own rot a lot sooner and umpteen millions would have been saved from poverty, misery, starvation and death. 7. Grant recognition of Red China and admission of Red China to the U.N. Not only did President Jimmy Carter fulfill this goal but he also betrayed America’s allies in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Iran, Afghanistan, Angola and elsewhere. 8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the U.N. 9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress. 10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N. 11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. There are still American intellectuals, and elected members of Congress, who dream of an eventual one world government and who view the U.N., founded by communists such as Alger Hiss, the first secretary-general, as the instrument to bring this about. World government was also the dream of Adolf Hitler and J.V. Stalin. World government was the dream of Osama bin Laden and the 9/11 hijackers. 12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party. 13. Do away with loyalty oaths. 14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office. While the idea of banning any political party runs contrary to notions of American freedom and liberty, notions that are the exact opposite of those held by the left-wing communists themselves, nevertheless these goals sought to undermine the constitutional obligation of Congress to investigate subversion. The weakening of our government’s ability to conduct such investigations led to the attack of 9/11. It is entirely proper and appropriate for our government to expect employees, paid by the American taxpayer, to take an oath of loyalty. 15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S. In his book "Reagan’s War," Peter Schweizer demonstrates the astonishing degree to which communists and communist sympathizers have penetrated the Democratic Party. In his book, Schweizer writes about the presidential election of 1979. 16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights. This strategy goes back to the founding of the American Civil Liberties Union by Fabian Socialists Roger Baldwin and John Dewey and Communists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn among others. 17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in textbooks. 18. Gain control of all student newspapers. 19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations that are under Communist attack. The success of these goals, from a communist perspective, is obvious. Is there any doubt this is so? 20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions. 21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures. 22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substituting shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms. 23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art." 24.Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press. 25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV. 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural and healthy." This is the Gramscian agenda of the "long march through the institutions" spelled out explicitly: gradual takeover of the "means of communication" and then using those vehicles to debauch the culture and weaken the will of the individual to resist. Today those few who still have the courage to advocate public morality are denounced and viciously attacked. Most Americans are entirely unwitting regarding the motives behind this agenda. 27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch." This has been largely accomplished through the communist infiltration of the National Council of Churches, Conservative and Reform Judaism, and the Catholic seminaries. 28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state" Replacing belief in the creator with belief in the earthly man-controlled State. 29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. And replace our nation of "laws, not men" with royal decree emanating from appointed judges and executive orders. Replace elected officials with bureaucrats. 30. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." 31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over. Obliterating the American past, with its antecedents in principles of freedom, liberty and private ownership is a major goal of the communists then and now. 32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. Public ownership of the means of production, the core principle of totalitarianism. 33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus. 34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities. 35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. 36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions. 37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business. Turn America into a socialist police state. 38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat. The Soviets used to send "social misfits" and those deemed politically incorrect to massive mental institutions called gulags. The Red Chinese call them 39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose communist goals. Psychiatry remains a bulwark of the communist agenda of fostering self-criticism and docility. 40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. Done! The sovereign family is the single most powerful obstacle to authoritarian control. 41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. Outcome-based education, values clarification or whatever they’re calling it this year. 42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political or social problems. This describes the dialectical fostering of group consciousness and conflict, which furthers the interests of authoritarianism. 43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government. The results of this successful campaign are increasingly obvious in the world today. 44. Internationalize the Panama Canal. 45. Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike. This would mark a complete subversion of our Constitution and an end to representative sovereign government as we know it, which is the whole idea. On the founding of our nation’s 250th birthday, it would be nice to set our eyes on the window displaying blue skies. But out on another window displays storm clouds. Montpelier’s decision to cancel any meaningful Fourth-of-July recognition along with our schools and our very own government promoting Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Black Lives Matter (BLM) tells us all we need to know about these ominous clouds. Both these movements are Marxist in origin. With CRT being a derivative of the German Marxist Frankfurt School and member Max Horkheimer’s 1937 essay titled ‘Traditional and Critical Theory’ and one BLM founder on record stating that they are trained Marxists. We have publicly confronted hate groups, fought for the abolition of corporal punishment in public schools, applied for equal representation when religious installations are placed on public property, provided religious exemption and legal protection against laws that unscientifically restrict people's reproductive autonomy, exposed harmful pseudo-scientific practitioners in mental health care, organized clubs alongside other religious after-school clubs in schools besieged by proselytizing organizations, and engaged in other advocacy in accordance with our tenets. But make no mistake; what is the same in all three ideologies is the desire to seize monolithic control of society. Mussolini termed this the Totalitarian Society: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” In order to get a better understanding of our storm clouds, let’s exam a few of the 45 Communist, and by extension Socialist and Progressive, goals that have been read into our Congressional Record: 01. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States. 02. Get control of the schools and teachers’ associations. Soften the curriculum. 03. Gain control of all student newspapers. 04. Infiltrate the press. 05. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV and pictures. 06. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and press. 07. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in the media. 08. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, and healthy.” 09. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. 09A. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principal of “separation of church and state.” Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate and old-fashioned. 10. Discredit the American founding fathers as selfish aristocrats [and racists]. 11. Belittle American culture and discourage the teaching of American history. 12. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. 13. Infiltrate and gain control of big business and unions. 14. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. 15. Treat all behavioral problems as mental health or social problems. 16. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. 17. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. 18. Repeal the Connally Reservation, allowing the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike. Garden Plot & Rex 84 With FEMA's Is A Blueprint for Martial Law A Readiness Exercise 1984 and it wasa classified scenario and new world order drill developed by the United States federal government to test their ability detain very large numbers in the tens of million of United States Citizens. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMADC is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation. This is how it is going to go down, the timeline might be a bit off. You will have one world faith, which is what the ecumenical movement is about. One world government, and all under control of the New World Order by July 4th 2026 on this the day of America’s up coming 250nd year of independence, unveiled a new updated flag which better reflects the nation in its present form, signaling the aspirations it has for its ever bright future. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen: Executive Orders Numbers are EO-#10990, EO-# 10995, EO-# 10997, EO-# 10998, EO-# 10999, EO-# 11000, EO-# 11001, EO-# 11002, EO-# 11003, EO-# 11004, EO-# 11005, EO-# 11051, EO-# 11310, EO-# 11049, EO-# 11921 Etc. Etc. The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 120,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people. Now let’s review the justification for any actions taken. Executive Orders associated with FEMADC that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Invisible Government stays in power and enslaves the common man and woman via a “System” of influence and control; a System so subtle and far-reaching most people can’t see it. This System has 7 main tentacles: #1 – BANKING: We live under the tyranny of an international BANKING scheme designed to regulate our currency and keep the common man poor and the rich man wealthy. #2 – POLITICS: We are given the illusion of freedom of choice but in reality we live under a dual party POLITICS system, with Republicans and Democrats being twin faces of the same corrupt coin—ensuring no meaningful change. #3 – EDUCATION: We and our children are put through an ineffective and dumbed-down EDUCATION system that limits our minds, so that regardless of the strength of any given teacher, we are all taught the same mind-limiting curriculum. #4 – PHARMACEUTICALS: We suffer under and indeed are purposely poisoned by a horrific and money-hungry PHARMACEUTICALS market that first creates the diseases—real or imagined—then advertises and sells us the “cure.” #5 – ARMAMENTS: We live in the shadow of a massive ARMAMENTS industry, which spreads fear and endorses war for profit; a united populace is not good, it would destabilize the armaments industry. #6 – RELIGION: We are taught to blindly follow watered-down RELIGIONS that divide the masses. The Western religions encourage people to seek “out there” for divinity and spiritual eternity, when in reality divinity and spiritual eternity exist within us already. The Invisible Government hides this truth. #7 – MASS MEDIA: The Invisible Government brainwashes us by television, and we’re taught to listen to and trust the corporate news MEDIA; we were long ago “sold” the illusion that there’s a group of journalists and editors fighting on our side; sadly, they pedal mostly lies, deception, superficiality, and fear. These 7 Sinister Tentacles of control by the Invisible Government were established long ago. The term “New World Order” is a misnomer; the Invisible Government has been around for a long time. Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings Now. The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold Without Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2025 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying sex worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2025 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 1000s sex/drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! In the United States, a red flag law is a gun violence prevention law that permits a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who they believe may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. It’s impossible to separate the traffic in humans, the traffic in drugs and guns, and the ambitions. They are all part of the same picture. any criminal organization with the intention of supplying drug trafficking operations. Good Luck With This One ? Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gun walking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You! The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Your Right to Remain Silent A New Answer to an Old Question - Do Not Talk ? O.K. -https://rumble.com/v297voe-your-right-to-remain-silent-a-new-answer-to-an-old-question-do-not-talk-o.k.html Don't Talk to the Police Ever! Fifth Amendment "Right To Remain Silent," When a witness is summoned to testify before a grand jury or at a judicial or legislative proceeding, the lawyer for the witness frequently concludes that it may be in the client's best interest to assert the Fifth Amendment "right to remain silent," at least with respect to certain topics. The lawyer will often give the witness a card to read aloud when asserting that privilege. But precisely what words should the lawyer advise the client to read when invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege? For more than 100 years, lawyers have shown surprisingly little imagination or ingenuity, advising their clients to state in almost exactly these words: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me." What people do not realize is what they don’t know actually can hurt them. If you don’t believe me, listen to the words of former United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, “[A]ny lawyer worth his [or her] salt will tell the [client] in no uncertain terms to make no statement to the police under any circumstances.” Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949) (emphasis added). Let us look at the situation a little more closely. If the police ever ask you to come in to the station “just to chat” or are stopping by “because they only have a couple questions for you” — that means one of two things: You are a suspect; You are a possible suspect. Does that clear the picture up? I sure hope so. There is absolutely no reason for the police to want to have any discussion with you unless they know something that you (probably) don’t. May be your name was mentioned during a discussion with another potential suspect, or perhaps someone is trying to frame you, or, worse yet, you look like the person who was present on the scene and an eyewitness made a mistake in identity. This kind of thing happens all the time. And innocent people end up in custody as a result. There is no reason to talk to the police especially if you’re innocent. There is no reason to talk to the police; especially if you’re innocent. Here are the top ten reasons why you should not talk to the police:* REASON #1: Talking to the police CANNOT and WILL NOT help you. Talking to the police cannot make any difference. Nobody can “talk their way out of” an arrest. No matter how “savvy” or intelligent you think you might be, you will not convince them that you are innocent. And any ‘good’ statements that may help you that you tell the police cannot be introduced into evidence because of hearsay rules. It’s a lose-lose situation; don’t talk to the police. REASON #2: Even if you’re guilty, and you want to confess and get it off your chest, you still shouldn’t talk to the police. There is plenty of time to confess and admit guilt later. Why rush the inevitable? First, hire an attorney. Let them do their work, and may be you will win your case. It is much harder to win when there is a confession. For example, do you know what happens if the cop cannot be located and there is no confession? The case gets dismissed! (It’s not a universal rule, but it’s more common than you might think.) Don’t talk to the police. REASON #3: Even if you are innocent, it’s easy to tell some little white lie in the course of a statement. When people assert their innocence, they sometimes exaggerate their statements and tell a little white lie on accident. That same lie could be later used to destroy your credibility at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #4: Even if you are innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, it is possible to give the police some detail of information that can be used to convict you. If you make any statement it could later be used against. E.g. “I did not kill the guy. I was not around the area when it happened. I don’t have a gun. I never owned a gun. I never liked the guy, but, hell, who did?” Bingo. We just found your incriminating statement: “I never liked the guy.” Don’t talk to the police. REASON #5: Even if you were innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, and you don’t give the police any information that can be used against you to prove motive or opportunity, you still should not talk to the police because the possibility that the police might not recall your statement with 100% accuracy. Nobody has a perfect memory. That includes law enforcement. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #6: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth, and your entire statement is videotaped so that the police don’t have to rely on their memory, an innocent person can still make some innocent assumption about a fact or state some detail about the case they overheard on the way to the police station, and the police will assume that they only way the suspect could have known that fact or that detail was if he was, in fact, guilty. If you overhear a fact from someone else and later adopt it as your own, it can be used to crucify you at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #7: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth in your statement, and you give the police no information that can be used against you, and the whole statement is videotaped, a suspect’s answers can still be used against him if the police (through no fault of their own) have any evidence that any of the suspect’s statements are false (even if they are really true). Honest mistakes by witnesses can land you in jail. Why take the risk? Don’t talk to the police. REASON #8: The police do not have authority to make deals or grant a suspect leniency in exchange for getting as statement. Law enforcement personnel do not have authority to make deals, grant you immunity, or negotiate plea agreements. The only entity with that authority is the County or Commonwealth Attorney in state court and the U.S. Attorney in federal court. The officers will tell you they do, but they are lying. They have a carte blanche to lie. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #9: Even if a suspect is guilty, and wants to confess, there may be mitigating factors which justify a lesser charge. You may be accused of committing one offense when, in fact, you are guilty of a lesser offense. By confessing to the higher offense, you are throwing away bargaining chips. The prosecutor can try the case with your confession to the higher offense. There is no reason to confess. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #10: Even for a completely honest and innocent person, it is difficult to tell the same story twice in exactly the same way. If trial is the first time you tell your story, then there is no other statement by you to contradict any of your facts. However, if you have told your story twice, once at trial, and once to the police, you are probably going to mess some facts up. It’s human nature. A good cross examination by a prosecutor will tear you apart. Don’t talk to the police. Taken from a video lecture by Professor Dwayne. The video is reproduced in full below.https://rumble.com/v297voe-your-right-to-remain-silent-a-new-answer-to-an-old-question-do-not-talk-o.k.html Many years ago, in the then-peaceful suburbs of where we lived on Long Island, NY, my across-the-street neighbor, an older woman, came running to our house in a panic, saying that her house had been robbed! To Bear Arms for Self-Defense: A “Right of the People” or a Privilege of the Few? During oral argument in the seminal case of District of Columbia v. Heller, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy asked counsel for the government whether the Second Amendment’s second clause—“the right of the people to keep and bear arms” concerned something besides the militia. When counsel replied that those words referred only to “a military context,” Justice Kennedy appeared to disagree by asking the further question, “It had nothing to do with the concern of the remote settler to defend himself and his family against hostile Indian tribes and outlaws, wolves and bears and grizzlies and things like that?” This question suggested that he read the Amendment to protect individual rights. But it also implied that the right extends outside the home, where unfriendly humans and animals would be encountered. USA-Mexico Border Invasion Declaration U.S.A. Open Sanctuary Cities Is Open To All -https://rumble.com/v43nu9n-usa-mexico-border-invasion-declaration-u.s.a.-open-sanctuary-cities-is-open.html United States Is A Constitutional Republic & Original Intent Of Constitution History - https://rumble.com/v4hw9cu-united-states-is-a-constitutional-republic-and-original-intent-of-constitut.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report -https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at - https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/or at -https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ THE U.S.A. NATIONAL BIRD IS NOT A BALD EAGLE & ITS THE GREAT SEAL OF THE PHOENIX - https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/celebrate/eagle.pdf- Before humans could communicate with words and written language, they used signs and symbols to tell their stories. Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good And God Bless You All... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026. We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1152+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.