14A War to Remove Trump from Ballot - it's not over

Zoom Call in the Swamp. Politics and Prose is popular bookstore there on the same block as Comet Ping Pong. This is not the 2024 talk about disqualifying Trump from the ballot, that's here: https://rumble.com/v5c9ra3-raskins-infamous-plotting-session-at-politics-and-prose-2024-to-disqualify-.html

J13 portion of the interview posted here https://rumble.com/v5b56vn-baker-86-on-tnn-live-ss-leadership-intentional-failure-8-to-twelve-casings-.html I skipped most of Harris/Tim Walz Jamie Raskin Pollitics & Prose talk is here: https://rumble.com/v5c9ra3-raskins-infamous-plotting-session-at-politics-and-prose-2024-to-disqualify-.html

with Peter Navarro on WR

Politics & Prose, down the block from Comet Ping Pong.

Robert Barnes, Via Frei. Full episode at https://rumble.com/v31sm3a-ep.-170-trump-trial-new-york-georgia-jan.-6-coutts-4-pathetic-puke-and-more.html timestamps 17m ep. 170 gameplan then they talk about Barbie and ESG for a while. Skip to 49:40 Trump trial date 59m Stormy Daniels NY case 1h12m Georgia and Jack Smith 1h16 target letter 1h20 Barnes' preferred strategy in 2020 compared to Powell, Wood, Giuliani was to challenge if the elections and votes were constitutional i.e. if state law said no voters could be registered to the Post Office, then ballots cast from the Post Office and counted are unconstitutional. 1h30 history of competing slates of electors 1h39 MI forgery law cited was designed for people falsifying deeds at the courthouse as to who owned homes, who owned property. Totally irrelevant. 1h22 Jack Smith doesnt meet the minimal threshold of alleging intent This starts around 1h30 Barnes doesn't think they're taking Trump off the ballot. It seems he underestimates the corruption. No legal basis doesn't mean they won't do it. #vivabarnes #vivabarneslaw #robertbarnes #vivafrei #electors

14A Section 3 "Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." One state at a time The racket is setting a trial date for after the election, then coordinating with Secretaries of State to remove Trump from their ballot because he is being charged with insurrection, no due process, no need to convict. Longer, Video version https://rumble.com/v2zh7am-liberal-groups-want-trump-removed-from-state-ballots-under-insurrection-cla.html #robertgouveia #PresidentTrump #colorrevolution

They're all hoaxes and fake lawsuits. Dershowitz thinks the Insurrection Clause refers to being a president, not running for it--DOESN'T apply to being on a ballot. So he'd have to be in office, and they'd have to do the full impeachment proceedings. AGAIN. Gouveia's show on this was good, he goes through everything. https://rumble.com/v341g1t-gouveia-leftists-trying-to-remove-trump-from-ballots-using-insurrection-cla.html TLDW there's a group of communists in lawyer hats and they're coordinating this spurious argument that Trump did an insurrection, since the talking heads say he did, and it disqualifies him from being on the ballot, and Secretaries of State can remove him if they share this OPINION. Nevermind the Senate already acquitted him on this. #gettrump #14A #hoax

Based Trump lawyer on 14A section 5 enforcement. Seemed like a win at the time but now Raskin is using it to draw up a BS resolution. Stay tuned more is coming, but in the meantime: Overview of Section 5, the Enforcement Clause: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S5-1/ALDE_00000850/ Modern Doctrine on Enforcement Clause: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S5-4/ALDE_00000853/ ^^^^ That's the question isn't it, what does Congress have to comply with to ban Trump and not be overruled by courts Brief from Trump's lawyers on Colorado Hoax: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-719/298125/20240118171750343_Trump%20v%20Anderson%20Petitioner%20Brief%20on%20the%20Merits.pdf docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/23-719.html Court opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

I think he meant a state AG since he said "an" AG and not "the". Trump's Insurrection hoax being led by Secretaries of State does not satisfy this. But if they can find a crooked AG to go along... more info https://rumble.com/v341g1t-gouveia-leftists-trying-to-remove-trump-from-ballots-using-insurrection-cla.html https://rumble.com/v340rwn-vivabarnes-rip-the-michigan-fake-electors-charges-72323.html https://rumble.com/v3iw6z0-dershowitz-on-the-14a-preemptive-impeachment-hoax.html

Notice that even when he sees it through, the shitbag's argument doesn't come down to any legal precedent, it's just a matter of what he thinks .... "I think...I think ...I think.." with no legal basis to it, at all. This is the type who say the 14A-insurrectionists' ban from the ballot is self-executing, or that Trump did an insurrection. And he's a senior professor at the University of Chicago. #insurrection hoax #14th amendment #communists