Alberta Referendum -do you Know the FACTS

Peter later removed from all further shows because i questioned the WW 2 official story

The corruption being uncovered in the Indian bands in Canada is displaying a microcosm of how money and power are used to control people in leadership positions everywhere. The Chiefs of the bands and band council are a small version of what happens everywhere on a provincial, federal and international level. It's all the same vector of control. They are being used as patsies for the UN to bring in the next big step towards global government as outlined by The Club of Rome in 1967. It's also where they invented "climate change". The Anglo-American Zionist establishment has perfected this over hundreds, if not thousands of years. Get a man addicted to money and power and he will do anything he is told. It's nothing new and it is not exclusive to Native bands. Corruption is at every level of government institutions. The fools that are participating in the Truth and Reconciliation racket are just the latest patsies of the day to execute the wishes of globalist elites and central bankers. OneBC Caucus is proud to present Making a Killing: Reconciliation, Genocide, and Plunder in Canada. Making a Killing is a feature documentary film exposing the massive scandal behind the taking of wealth, land, and power from the Canadian public to benefit indigenous tribes. It debunks the worst lie in Canadian history: the lie that 215 bodies were found at the Kamloops Residential School and that Canadians committed a mass murder against indigenous children. Making a Killing is the first documentary film produced by an elected caucus.

The Secret Life of Canada - You do Not Want to Miss This (Share https://rumble.com/v6au8a7-the-secret-life-of-canada-you-do-not-want-to-miss-this-share.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=8846f3f3-fb7d-4ab5-8c2c-a01997f70c4e No Referendum Required: Our Legal Rights Under the Statute of Westminster Are Already Established https://rumble.com/v6sxlsn-no-referendum-required-our-legal-rights-under-the-statute-of-westminster-ar.html If Alberta truly wants an Independent Nation you MUST Share this Video https://rumble.com/v6synyt-if-alberta-truly-wants-an-independent-nation-you-must-share-this-video.html https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ FACTS https://constitutionalconventions.ca/category/historic-facts/ CANADAS HISTORY Mr. Kuhl’s final year serving as a politician, he brought forward Canada’s constitutional problems in the House of Commons. Here is the transcript of that entry. CANADA A COUNTRY WITHOUT A CONSTITUTION https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mr.-W.-F.-KUHL-Constitutional-Crisis.pdf Ho Canada Rogers Smith Many Known so Little About so Much HO, CANADA ! by R. Rogers Smith, https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ho_Canada_Rogers_Smith.pdf Walter Kuhl: Canada A Country Without A Constitution https://rumble.com/v26rfc0-walter-kuhl-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=190dccaf-e206-4097-8978-7189b61e790d Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a CANADIANS NEED TO BE EDUCATED ABOUT CANADA’S HISTORY https://rumble.com/vv14sk-canadians-need-to-be-educated-about-canadas-history.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a No Treason The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner https://rumble.com/vwqbr8-no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority-by-lysander-spooner.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Do You Really Know The Fact About UNDRIP! https://rumble.com/v27vm2r-do-you-really-know-the-fact-about-undrip.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a The Queen's secrets eh? - Debunk This https://rumble.com/v26r4qw-the-queens-secrets-eh-debunk-this.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a R. R. Smith Alberta Has A Sovereign Right.... A Factual Examination of The Constitutional Problem https://rumble.com/v26r9sk-r.-r.-smith-alberta-has-a-sovereign-right....-a-factual-examination-of-the-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a EXTREME PRIORITY - EVERYONE MUST GET THIS MESSAGE https://rumble.com/v2buvv0-extreme-priority-everone-must-get-this-message-out.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration https://rumble.com/v2c4dpg-how-to-create-a-lawful-republic-administration.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Share this Video to Open their Eyes to Facts! https://rumble.com/v2uz93g-alberta-fires-update-time-to-restore-law.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Laura Nina was live From UK with Dallas Hills https://rumble.com/v3mhl7r-laura-nina-was-live-constitutional-conventions.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Martens - with important information (Share) https://rumble.com/v4aky5u-darcy-martans-with-important-information-share.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Proof of Claim obligated to pay Property tax, income tax and other taxes https://rumble.com/v4arclw-proof-of-claim-obligated-to-pay-property-tax-income-tax-and-other-taxes.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Pissed off Grama needs your Attention https://rumble.com/v4bklpi-pissed-off-grama-needs-your-attention.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a FACTS vs FICTION KNOW WHO OWNS THE LAND - Not canada or their corrupt piece of toilet paper https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Educates Truth Feb. 2024 https://rumble.com/v4i7iwo-darcy-educates-truth-feb.-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Edson Town Hall Education of FACTS on How You Are Truly Governed ! https://rumble.com/v4n50dh-edson-town-hall-education-of-facts-on-how-you-are-truly-governed-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Create a nation within a hijacked land from Alberta or Canada Masquerading as a legit government https://rumble.com/v6kgt3m-create-a-nation-within-a-hijacked-land-from-alberta-or-canada-masquerading-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a DECLARATION OF ALBERTA SOVEREIGNTY -Become involved in your local constitutional committee meetings https://rumble.com/v6szpql-declaration-of-alberta-sovereignty-become-involved-in-your-local-constituti.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio this evening. The topic of discussion was the Statute of Westminster, 1931, and its implications on the land mass commonly referred to as "Canada." It was supposed to be a moderated debate, but we got blind sided a bit. First off, we appreciate that Marilyn took the time and accepted the invitation to the debate. Believe it or not, she is actually the first solicitor to have done so! Thank you, Marilyn. However, it quickly became obvious that Marilyn had an agenda - and that agenda was to attack, to discredit, and to smear. I had prepared my documents for a respectful debate and discussion of facts. I was not interested in a conversation that showed mostly disrespect and mockery while repeating legal opinions that have no standing in law. Sadly, Marilyn brought absolutely nothing of substance to the table. A few times, she diverted, distracted, and changed course abruptly - tactics that are used to confuse the audience so that the listener cannot follow along and forgets the actual topic of discussion. Clever! But I think quite a few people in the chat noticed that. Marilyn did not engage with highly important facts regarding sovereignty, land ownership, real constitutional documents such as the 1763 Letters Patent (not fake "constitutions" like the BNA Act) and the all-important definition of the Crown Office, the latter having been customary since the 16th century and backed up by numerous court cases (you'd think as a solicitor she'd know the court cases...). Instead, she kept repeating legal (legal = statutory, not based in law) opinions that are contradicted by the facts stated in the source documents. We wish her all the best with her referendum and her corporate, statutory (unlawful) plans to ensure that the People do not find out the truth. After all, in her capacity she must have sworn an Oath of Allegiance to none other than "His Majesty King Charles the Third, His heirs and successors" which in accordance with established legal doctrine, and confirmed in numerous court cases, is in fact none other than the Crown Office. :) Someone out there is starting to get scared of us and the facts that we have presented. Otherwise, they would not see the need to attack, mock and smear. Good! The best is yet to come! solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio

This short video details how the Clarity Act, 2000, is designed to make any referendum fail. A referendum is completely unnecessary because each Province and Territory has in fact been fully independent and sovereign since December 11, 1931, thanks to Sections 2, 7 and 11 of the Statute of Westminster.

Clarity Act, 2000 Explained catch 22 To give effect to the requirement for clarity. As set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada. In the Quebec sessions reference, and this was done in the year 2000, June 29th. Just to elaborate a little bit on the difference between an opinion of the court and a ruling of the court. Well, it's the same thing that we do. I mean, I have… 100,000 opinions, as do you. Example I like a certain kind of beer and that's my opinion. You might like another kind of beer and that's your opinion and that's really all the Supreme Court is doing. They're just giving an opinion. But now as many of you have come to realize the illegal and unlawful federal authority decided to create what they call a law. On that opinion. Now, if it was a ruling, there would have to be a case and a court case in front of them. Right. That they would make a ruling out off. In other words, they would be resolving a dispute. So you and I go to court. We get into an argument. The court then makes a ruling, which is to settle our argument. The opinion is not the same as a ruling. Opinion is just the court going, well, you know, we think This is our opinion. Yeah, it has no legal enforcement qualities to it. Well, now it does, according to them. According to the criminals… Well, and you've got to ask yourself Really, everyone must comprehend this and share this to others Section 59 of their Constitution Act was never ratified. In order for it to come into supreme law in Canada, they need to ratify it, and they have yet to do that. So think about this how does something like this have any standing in law? This was done in 2000. They still have to ratify the Constitution Act in 1982 which still to this day of May 2025 never has been satisfied or even ratified it has been 42 years since the Constitution Act of 1982 and its been in limbo since then. They never did. They tried Meeach Lake Accord, the Charlottetown Accord, but it never came to fruition. In other words it failed or did the deliberate ensure it failed. So lets all look at the preamble where it says, whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that there is no right under international law or under the Constitution of Canada Again do not forget, they haven't ratified this constitutional act of 1982 Remember international and Canada are maritime jurisdictions, because both international and Canada are maritime jurisdictions. Also for the National Assembly Legislature, the government of Quebec to take effect this succession of Quebec from Canada unilateral. So this was happening when Quebec was looking to once again Leave. Yes Quebec they keep threatening to separate. like, this whole issue here in 2000. Most Canadians thought the whole separation issue with Quebec was over and done with with Rennie Levesque and his separatist vote was in 1976 Today most of the people thought it was finished and it continued on right up to 2000 and it still has continued Do not forget that in 76, that's when Walter F. Kuhl gave Rene Levesque, the letter. Walter F. Kuhl in detailed letter stated how can you ask for a divorce without first having a marriage. You're already separate nation. HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED? In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit. As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully. I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province. It's all about money and power. That's all it is. Let us go back and in the second paragraph says, whereas any proposal relating to the breakup of a democratic state Do you find this statement of democratic state bizarre or very strange. Is a matter of the utmost gravity and is of fundamental importance to all of its citizens. And once again in red, I've put in brackets slaves Whereas the government, the corporate regime of any province of Canada Incorporated is entitled to consult its population by referendum. On any issue and is entitled to formulate The wording of the referendum question. I will read it once again. Whereas the government of any province of Canada is entitled to consult its population by referendum on any issue and is entitled It's entitled to formulate the wording of its referendum question. This does not mention you , me or any of the people. Now we have this movement of referendum initiated by the Citizens with the Alberta Prosperity Project and a few more controlled Groups spouting the same regurgitated nonsense. So all of you out there thinking, we're going to have referendum. They hare blowing smoke up your ass. You been duped. Now lets discuss this in further detail. This means in their words he government gets to decide the wording of the question in your referendum Not you and it gets worse. Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada It's no longer an opinion, has determined that the result of a referendum on succession of a province from Canada must be free of ambiguity, both in terms of the question asked and in terms of the support it achieves. And that result is to be taken as an expression of the democratic will that will rise to an obligation to enter into negotiations. What this means is you can not just leave. This mean there must be a negotiations. That might… lead might lead to secession. Again this means the government has to give you permission to tell them you want to leave… Then you get to sit down with them and negotiate the possibility of leaving. Important you and I and the people do not get to sit down and negotiate. That is right the selected officials get a sit down. yes the same ones who swore and oath the King Charles. Let us not all forget what the recent dictators did in the Moron plandemic of lies and deceit. They shut down the economy, locked everyone up and forced an injection of poison or the kill shot to millions. Now you and I think of negotiations such as with a trade unions or contracts in business. And we all know from life experience negotiations take a long time and sometimes there is never an agreement and it just ends with no more negotiations. What do you do when the government says, well, we just won't recognize your referendum? They rule and own their system. This means go back to work slave and shut up or we lock you down again. And it gets better. Oh, of course it does. This is the unlawful federal government. They can do what ever they want. Do you think they want to give up there fiefdom of slavery. Not a chance. From the clarity act it goes on to say, whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has stated that democracy means More than a simple majority rule. So Really what does this mean. It means more than a majority rule, yet every law dictionary says majority rule. The Supreme Court of Canada somehow thinks it's above the law once again. And I hat to burst you bubble they are above the law, because their are no concrete laws in Canada corporation. They have the so called power to rewrite any law that suits their agenda of control And hence the simple majority rule that a clear majority in favor of secession must be required to create an obligation to negotiate secession. So what exactly does this mean in layman's terms. it means you got to have a clear majority is based on their opinion of what a clear majority is. So what do you think their clear majority is going to be 100%. 90% A clear majority will be a 100% of the people agreeing to succeed so you can come to the negotiating table to secede. I hear all this talk of 50 percent plus one, or 63 percent and so on. So let this sink in. They decide not you and I . Are this referendum going to be counted by paper or electronic vote counting machines. Now again they only get to negotiate. So say after the referendum if it every comes we have 100% vote to leave, but it's still a negotiation. This is how ridiculous this is ? And then it goes on to say, and that a qualitative evaluation is required to determine whether a clear majority in favor of secession exist in the circumstances. Qualitative evaluation involves the “why” and the “how” and allows a deeper look at issues This means not only do you have to have a clear majority, now they're going to put a council together a group of people to make sure that you had a clear majority. The criminals are going to determine it. Do the average man and woman comprehend the referendum initiated by the people have no input at all. Are the Alberta Prosperity Project, Wexit and the 51 first state misleading people. Well of course they are. I have met with APP and Wexit and the 51 State leaders since 2020 and have show clear evidence the clarity is useless and after all this information, they still push this nonsense to millions. You may ask Why? Well because its just another distraction to keep the people walking in circles while they move forward with their UN Agenda 30 world enslavement. Every man and woman who are looking at this referendum need to be educated on what this clarity act is. Furthermore all these people such as the grand jury people you need to read this and share this so more become educated. You will never become liberated until you are educated The Clarity Act goes on to say, whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that In Canada, the secession of a province to be lawful would require an amendment to the Constitution of Canada. This means for this secession to become lawful you have to have an amendment to the constitution that isn't lawful. This is how ridicules this really is Again they didn't ratify the Constitution Act in 1982. Who is they you may ask. Not you or I or the people but the selected agents for the corporation of Canada Both accords were deliberately sabotaged in 1987 and 1995 but the deceivers or criminals say it would take an amendment to that unlawful and illegal document to leave. Again it says would require an amendment to the Constitution of Canada. What constitution are they're referring to, the photocopy in Ottawa that Pierre Trudeau picked up at a gift shop in Britain of the BNA act. The photocopy of North America Act. Yeah, that's the one they have in the archives in Ottawa. The originals in the UK archives because it's their property. To add the BNA act was a document to rape, pillage, murder and enslave pheasants. The Clarity act goes on to say that such an amendment would would pre-force required negotiations in relation to secession involving at least the governments of all the provinces and the Government of Canada. Then it states the negotiations would be governed by the principles of federalism. Democracy, constitutionalism, and the rule of law Lets go over this last statement for clarification - Democracy, constitutionalism, and the rule of law and the protection of minorities. The protection of the minorities! What is federalism ? It says a principle of government that defines the relationship between the central government at the national level and its constituents units at the regional, state, or local levels. Under this principle of government, power and authority is allocated between the national and local government units. Such that each unit is delegated a sphere of power and authority only it can exercise While other powers must be shared. None of this is in the Corporation of Canada We look at what democracy is mob rule and that is definitely in Canada. Constitutionalism, well, considering that Canada doesn't have one We will read it anyway. The principles of a constitutional government or adherence to them. Constitutional rule or authority. That's what it defines as and then the rule of law. A state of order in which events conform to law. Huge Problem is that Canada doesn't have the rule of law. We don't have law of the land. That's the rule of law. We have color of law, because Canada only exists on the water. If you look under the Interpretations Act and look up The definition of Canada as per their definition. It's the internal waters and external seas. In the Clarity Act whereas in light of finding by the Supreme Court of Canada that it would be… that it would be for elected representatives to determine what constitutes a clear question and what constitutes a clear majority in a referendum held in a province on secession. lets look at this in more detail the clarity act states It would be for the elected representatives to determine what constitutes the clear question that you can ask. And what constitutes a clear majority? So MP's MLA's or the selected employees who swore an oath to the King not the people their job is on the line if the profit secedes. So do you think for one second that the selective representatives want to lose their job by giving you The clear question and a clear majority in a referendum? Moron fake plandemic Must educate you how they did nothing to stop and all of the libs and Cons, NDP and the Green all voted for UN Agenda 30 sustainable death sentence to the people or slaves. No. They'll be fair with all of us. If you Have read the little child case? there's how much fair you're going to get. Furthermore is states the house of commons as the only political institution elected to represent all Canadians. It has an important role in identifying what constitutes a clear question and a clear majority sufficient for the government of Canada to enter into negotiations In relation to secession of a province from Canada. Talk about stacking the deck 100% in their favor. And yeah, this is, A P P or Wexit, is running around pushing the referendum and so… You want to waste your time? I hope Not. Who hear still think they're going to start a political party and push to have referendums and we're going to get a vote on it in in Parliament. They've already voted laws that totally, basically… they will stop any movement for a referendum by we the people. They silence we the people and use their hired guns, the selected employees for the corporation of Canada . Yes the ones who swore and oath to the King and Privy council, also to keep secrets of what is discussed. In layman's terms this means Shut up to we the people or slaves if you more up to speed on how we are truly governed under this dictatorship. In the Clarity Act it states whereas it is incumbent on the Government of Canada not to enter into negotiations that might lead to the secession of a province from Canada and that could consequently entail the termination of citizenship and other rights that the Canadian residents in the province enjoy as full participants in Canada. Unless the population of that province has clearly expressed its democratic will that the prophets succeed from Canada. Let this sink in for a second. Doesn't it already require them to express their democratic will to leave Canada before they even begin negotiations? Correct. here is the kicker. The termination of citizenship and other rights of Canadian citizens. What does this mean. When you secede from Canada, meaning that you're giving them the audios or goodbye or hit the road were moving on! … you're losing your citizenship. So basically, if you terminate your citizen, if this causes the termination of a citizenship, you can't have a referendum and you can't leave. It's a catch of 22. They have covered every base with landmines. Unless the population of the province has clearly expressed its democratic will that the province succeed from Canada. So that would mean 100% of the population of of the province must want to secede. Yes 100% of the province. Now reality check you go to a restaurant with 10 people on what toppings they would like on a pizza. Basically not all are going to agree. Everybody gets cheese and pepperoni. That's it. Okay, good luck with that and having them agree to it. Even two people have a hard time to agree let alone several million people all have to agree. They say here clearly expressed. It's democratic will that the province secede from Canada. So what would be the democratic will? In order for the termination of citizenship, which will happen upon secession. So 100% that they are willing to give up their citizenship. Not 99, not 99.99. Not 98, but 100%. Otherwise, if it terminates citizenship, guess what? You can't do it. So they leave that to the very end. That's the catch-22. If it terminates the citizenship, guess what? Your referendum even to negotiate secession can't go forward. This is why any of these different movements that you see out there that claim… We're going to do this and attack them from within. We're going to get this and we're going to use that. How well did all the challenges when your masters locked you up, took your jobs, and told you to go home and lock yourself into your prison. So many uneducated people challenged the charter, the bill of rights, used common law and many resorted to the Magna Carta with no comprehension of what these really were. They just followed the controlled ops or agents blindly. The Magna Carta and Article 61. None of that will ever work. It does not exist or apply to slaves Here is a question did the Supreme Court of Alberta tell the people of Alberta you have no choice . The politicians or employees for the corporation of Alberta Canada can do whatever they want once they're selected they can thumb their nose at you and still get a paycheck Because they're politicians. You can't fix the system from within. These criminals have hundred years of writing laws just like this that make it impossible For you, the citizen or slave to use their system to empower you. Everything about their system is designed to keep you under their… thumb. Coming back to Article 61 of the Magna Carta, has to be the Magna Carta 1225. It cannot refer to the 1215 as the 1215 was never ratified. Even the 1225 Article 61 is no longer even relevant anymore , the last time it was ever used successfully was in 1688.in the UK and that Magna Cartas has been buried and collecting dust and never to the daylight or in law ever again. Reason is in 1689 The English Bill of Rights was created by William and Mary which basically negated the Magna Carta, which was why 1688 was the last time it was successfully used and so people who talk about using the Magna Carta today or regurgitating have no clue. They need to study their history before they lead others down the path of the dead end gang. They need to understand what they're talking about because they are blowing smoke like A P P, wexit , Concerned Canadian, Alberta proud, Alberta Separation, and other talking heads misdirecting the facts. And I've been saying that for a long time. I am happy to say… that a large number of the men and women are catching on to these facts. They're starting realize you can't use something that ceased to exist hundreds of years ago You can't use something that was created by a foreign de-facto government only exists by the power of that foreign government and has nothing to do with we, the people. Slowly, people are starting to catch on to the importance Of those three little words we the people. They are the most powerful words in any free society. Whether it's a democracy, a republic. They are, without a doubt, the most powerful words. One more major topic I want to discuss is the conflict of the traditional lands called treaty rights. The Indian Act is no different than the BNA Act, All men and women in every province have been harmed. To correct this all men and women must sit down create a contract or constitution in their respected areas. The first nations have been abused and harmed still to this current day as every other man and women in the corporations. So when I see these so called speakers for the Bands saying no separation this concerns me deeply are these individuals actually educated or compromised. Who in their right mind would want to continue with the corporation of Canada or even any of the corporations of the Provinces. These individuals must be compromised and are no longer needed to represent the majority of the first nations, Bribe after bribe keeps these globalist Chiefs workings maintain this corrupt unethical system The solution is we the people create a constitution we all can agree to , which ends the land claims as of now No One has any land its all owned by the Vatican crown corporation Time to end the fraud Dallas Hills .

https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ If Alberta truly wants an Independent Nation you MUST Share this Video For those who want a Independent Nation there is No Referendum Required: Our Legal Rights Under the Statute of Westminster Are Already Established There is a growing narrative being promoted by political groups such as the Alberta Prosperity Project (A P P) and Premier Danielle Smith that a referendum under the Clarity Act is necessary to determine Alberta’s future sovereignty. This narrative is not only misleading—it is legally unfounded. No referendum is required to exercise the legal rights that already exist under the Statute of Westminster 1931. This landmark statute granted full legislative autonomy and the right to self-determination to the former dominions of the British Empire. It effectively transferred the allodial land title, constitutional authority and political responsibility from the United Kingdom to the peoples of those dominions—placing sovereign control in the hands of "We the People." As a matter of law, the Statute affirms that the people of former British dominions have complete control over their own constitutional affairs, with no further requirement for approval from the British Crown or Parliament. The authority to govern, legislate, and self-determine resides within the people themselves—not with corporations masquerading as federal institutions acting on fraudulently assumed power. From this legal perspective, all federal and provincial governments operating since 1931 have functioned de facto—lacking any legal legitimacy under a proper reading of post-Westminster Statute sovereignty. They continue to act within a constitutional framework that was dissolved and fundamentally altered by the Statute but never acknowledged or implemented in favor of the people. In other words, the legal foundation for independence and self-determination is already in place. These rights are not contingent on a popular vote or public referendum. They are embedded in international law and recognized by the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth nations. Any suggestion that a referendum is needed to claim what is already legally ours fundamentally misrepresents the facts. The referendum being pushed by A P P and similar actors appears designed not to secure our sovereignty, but to undermine it—by falsely implying that our legal status is incomplete or conditional. This is incorrect. The legal independence granted by the Statute of Westminster stands as a matter of law and remains valid today. Likewise, the referendum being promoted by Premier Danielle Smith and her political allies is nothing more than a distraction from the real solution. It shifts focus, energy and resources away from the existing Westminster Statute's legal framework to delay or prevent any meaningful action, all while figures like Mark Carney and other globalist interests pursue their broader agendas—such as integrating Canada into a centralized, post-national global order. By tying our legal rights to a so-called Clarity Act referendum, political leaders are attempting to reframe our sovereignty already granted under the Westminster Statute within a federalist process that was effectively dissolved by the Statute of Westminster in 1931. This statute transferred full constitutional authority to the people of the former dominions, recognizing their inherent right to self-determination. The Clarity Act, introduced decades later under a de facto regime, is not legally binding on the people or the provinces and was crafted as a deceptive political tool to maintain illegitimate control over the people. It is crucial to understand, if We the People participate in such a referendum, we risk inadvertently legitimizing the very federal framework that the Statute of Westminster rendered obsolete. By acting as though our rights must be granted or approved through a federal process, we the people may undermine our own legal standing under international law. Our sovereignty is not something to be requested or voted on—it already exists as a matter of law. So, it is extremely important that We the People say NO to a referendum and say Yes to asserting our sovereignty under the provisions of the Statute of Westminster 1931. Our rights are not up for debate—they are already legally in force. It is our responsibility to claim them, not to ask for permission. Say No to a de facto Clarity Act Referendum! Stand up and say Yes to ASSERTING Alberta Sovereignty under the 1931 Westminster Statute !!! * Note: The legal rights and provisions affirmed under the Statute of Westminster, 1931 apply equally to all provinces and territories across Canada. Canadians need to be educated about Canada’s history – this is absolutely key if the people of the Canadian provinces have any chance of taking control of their lives and what belongs to them. To understand where we are, we must first understand how we got here… Deep research has unearthed key events, which have both created and hidden the truth of what Canada is, and how you are governed. (Under a Dictatorship unaccountable to We The People) Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation. This video next will give you all the information needed so you may move forward on the solution and please share to all the groups who want a Sovereign Nation It is time we all share the facts so others will gain the much needed knowledge. If we all share this video on every social media platform this message will become the solution everyone has been waiting and looking for Enjoy the next presentation as it surely will educate millions who still have not heard about the Statute of Westminster 1931 “Constitutional Conventions” has had the information available for many to learn. We have other groups that are are also educating the facts. We must unite and spread this powerful message together. How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration (Hold Constitutional Conventions and seat a De Jure Republic) How and who properly creates constitutions and sovereign Republic Nation. It requires merely a public consensus about the purpose of the nation and how to best achieve it. a) First, there must be a Territory (such as a province, i.e. Alberta) whose sovereigns desire to be a Sovereign Republic Nation. b) From among themselves the Sovereigns in and throughout their respective territory create Constitutional Convention Committees (which is in the works) throughout all the Nations/Provinces and Territories. Each Committee has Sovereign’s appointed in each Constitutional Committee Conventions who communicate with other Constitutional Convention Committees throughout the Territory. (which is being done in many areas throughout every province) With internet and the advancement of technology Constitutional Convention Committees throughout the Territory(s) of a Province with the formulation of a Constitutional Convention to create and Ratify a Constitution. This is a Constitution of, “We the Sovereigns for the Sovereigns by the Sovereigns” is how the Constitutional Conventions are being formed in every Nation/Province and Territory. c) The Constitutional Conventions add the information from the Sovereigns to the draft. The updated draft is updated to Republic Constitution draft for the Sovereigns for review and public debate, to provide an opportunity for changes. d) After numerous public debate they work out the changes, after which it is submitted again to the Sovereigns for review and further changes, if necessary. e) This process is repeated until the Republic Constitution has become a formula acceptable to the Sovereigns. f) Now the Sovereigns will be able to ratify the Republic Constitution with an affirmation; to accept the Republic Constitution. Constitutional Conventions website will make the process easy for all to read, input ideas, and to Ratify the Republic Constitution. g) If the Republic Constitutional draft cannot be achieved, further changes must be made until the Republic Constitution is acceptable to the Sovereigns. h) The entire process is recorded and documented as proof of the Republic Constitution’s authority. i) On the basis of the Republic Constitution an Administration is then formed, which is contractually bound (social contract) to respect it and conduct itself in accordance with it. j) Now this Sovereign Republic Nation can form a federation with other Sovereign Nations if it wishes to do so. Note: that no consideration has been given to the manipulative interference from privately owned media monopolies or Law Societies i.e. the BAR. Note: that the Republic Constitution is created first, then the administrative body and then the courts, to create a Republic Nation for the Sovereigns, by the Sovereigns, of the Sovereigns, it cannot be any other way. Note: no foreign Nations or entity can formulate (or create) the Constitution of another nation. It must be created by the Sovereigns themselves and becomes, for all intent purposes, their protected property. It’s not only lawful but is a contract, which subjugates the Administrative body to the Republic Sovereigns. The Administrative body derives a limited authority to administer from it, always subject to the Sovereign’s authority. Share, Like & Share on Facebook Tweet the Provinces Must Become their Own Independent Republic to Survive When you tweet ensure you share this video so they will be able to connect with others working on this important draft of a constitution. Join The Solution, Join your own local constitutional committee convention meetings to draft a Constitution and a Republic’s Declarations. The Answer to OUR FREEDOM is a SOVEREIGN SOLUTION and our own constitution that protects are unalienable rights, property rights and the rights to our future generations. There is a draft available that has been in the works for you to view and add your input. Together we can have this accomplished if we all come together and share this information everywhere Once completed imagine having an accountable system to we the people unlike the de-facto system that has been unaccountable and has harmed us since the formation of de-facto Canada, de-facto provinces and de-facto mayors and councilor's. Thank you lets get this done, This is for everyone who wants a future Thank You Dallas

Rob in the Page family Separatist energy is growing strong in the west as a result of the election. May I remind people that you don't need a referendum to be free of the king? There are ways of being free that brings peace, not war. When I decided to declare my independence, I wondered how to do it. That is when I remembered the Declaration of Independence that the US wrote in 1776. I read the document and found a declaration of war in it. I didn't want war, I wanted peace. So I re-wrote it to reflect my intent. I declared peace, established my own law form and forgave the Queen, seeing her as my sister. It wasn't until years later that I realized I followed one of four ways to end a feudal relationship. I refused service to the Queen in court. Remember, the Queen or King is the highest court, just as the Governor General's Privy Council. This is how we can be free without forcing our will against those who don't want to be free. Holding referendums, voting or participating with the King is an act of violence against our fellow brothers and sisters. Blockading is an act of war. I also need to remind people that peace is not passive either. I'm not sure where that idea came from, but we don't need to fight the globalist or the state. Peace does involve action, standing up, having a voice and confronting wickedness. It requires courage, integrity and strength. Peace is not a pushover, nor is it passive or weak. We don't need to be disobedient to be free. We can do this the clean, honorable and peaceful way. We can emancipate ourselves and the land we need to live, thrive and prosper. Don't let the energy of fear, hatred and contempt drive the choices towards mob rule, war, revolution or death. I urge extreme conscious awareness at this critical time. Give peace a chance. It starts within and shines all around us through our hearts. I'm happy to see people are ready to leave the King. Let's make sure we don't create the same problem that you are leaving. Explore the root causes so we can break these cycles of revolutions and wars. Peace, freedom and love is the way.

Rob In the Page family I'm getting tagged in posts regarding Alberta separation. Time for my own take on the topic. Alberta is a feudal manor within the king's demesne. The king's claim over the land is based on fraud, extortion, genocide, theft, greed, conflict of interest and other unsavory behaviours. I've challenged the king on his claim of ownership over the land and he had no standing. To the point that the Lieutenant Governor acknowledged my letter and sent me her best wishes. The fact is: WE ARE THE LAND Any claim of ownership over the land puts people into involuntary slavery. We are supposed to be working together to be co-stewards of the land, to replenish the Earth and bring prosperity for ALL life. The feudal state called "Alberta" is a fictional construct (King in right of Alberta) that people are addicted to preserving. Why? Because people are helplessly dependent upon it, they give their power away to it, swore an oath of fealty and don't know how to govern themselves. They have worked their entire life to this end as a result of the lies, deception and manipulation of a group of wicked people. Children protest and hold temper tantrums. Adults take action and do something about it. There is no asking for permission from the king to do something. If you need permission, then you are a child. Authority has a stranglehold on our minds and hearts for a reason: control the farm animals for harvest. We are dealing with evil systems and wicked people. This is all a manipulation to control the narrative in order to fulfill prophecy. Whether you believe in end time prophecy or not, these people do and they will do anything to make it happen. Research the 1973 Club of Rome's 10 Kingdoms and then the 10 Kingdoms in Revelations. There is lots going on regarding the third temple as well. They will work to dissolve nations and make north America one of their kingdoms. The question people should be asking is: How do we escape this timeline and create something peaceful, loving and supportive of life? I can't answer that question for you. People have to come up with their own ideas, path and take that leap of faith. Also requires profound healing, knowledge and experience as well. Significant changes are in order, which is uncomfortable and scary. For me, I will continue to emancipate the land from the demesne of the Crown. I make no claim of ownership over the land, because we are the land. Instead, I work to return the land to spiritual jurisdiction so that we can learn how to co-steward the land together. Please be careful of anyone who claims ownership over the land. They are trying to enslave people and be an earthly king. The kingdom is WITHIN!!! Please remember that -Rob In the Page family

Peter Lougheed passed on Sep 14, 2012 - so does anyone know who he is