Are we approaching the theory of everything from the wrong direction? Let me Explain! | ⚛

Have you ever heard of Gall's Law? It states: "all complex systems that work evolved from simpler systems that worked." Basically, everything, life, galaxies, the stars, arise from simpler systems. A good analogy is Lego bricks. With just a few brick shapes you can make everything from a skyscraper to a cricket. However, if string theory, or more generally M-theory is to be believed physics flagrantly breaks Gall's Law and doesn't care to show up in court to defend itself. Why would our simple three-dimensional universe arise from the seemingly more complex ten dimensions predicted by M-theory? Until recently I think it's always pretty much been the assumption of physicists that complex things arise from simpler things, and it certainly seemed that way until around the early nineteen hundreds. Instead of trying to figure the last one hundred years out from the top down like physicists traditionally have done. Let's take a page from Gall's law and start with a simple question: What is the most likely universe? Following that: Is that the universe we find ourselves in and can we use logic to answer those two questions so we can attack the complexity of modern theoretical physics from the other end of the shooting range. I think so, let me explain why!

Support me on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/daein

Engage me and others on discord:
https://discord.gg/hRpjUamzGj

Follow me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/DaeinBallard

Follow me on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/DaeinExplains/

Follow me on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/daeinexplains/