3 years ago

Rumble = https://rumble.com/user/SweetHomeStAugustine

Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/

POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com

https://www.theepochtimes.com/what-is-covid-injection-fatality-rate_4422653.html?utm_source=healthtop5noe&utm_campaign=htop5-2022-04-29&utm_medium=email&est=%2F2QkHpvcesgxYxFKHyJ%2BSuNFAffyaHPYedGpxC3DKalAP7WnMtuqgTA4hP7krH3L

Story at-a-glance

· Dr. Spiro Pantazatos is a researcher at Columbia University who recently co-authored a study on “vaccine-induced fatality rate”

· His initial reaction to the COVID pandemic was 100% mainstream, and it was the data (and his scientific integrity) that compelled him to change his mind

· Dr. Spiro Pantazatos believes that the risk associated with COVID injections is comparable to the risk associated with getting COVID in 2020, with the injection risks increasing with each dose

· His message for the fellow scientists is to find their voice and stop being silent

A researcher’s name is Spiro Pantazatos, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurobiology (Psychiatry) at Columbia University. The title of his paper is “COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk”:

“Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR).

Regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month-and week-level resolutions, respectively).”

Dr. Pantazatos is trying to find a home for this paper but all journals where he submitted it have declined so far.

Dr. Pantazatos was interviewed for the “Perspectives on the Pandemic” series. The presentation is so graceful and even-headed that it could be “the” video to send to your friends who have been calling you crazy all this time!

Early in the pandemic, Dr. Pantazatos was very moved by the vivid images that the media was feeding us — and, he became terrified of the virus. His initial plan was to lockdown inside his house until the vaccines came out.

But then he started looking at data presented by scientists like John Loannidis, for example, and he quickly realized that the situation was different from the one painted by the media.

Dr. Pantazatos’ co-author on this paper came up with an analysis of European data showing a consistent trend where a vaccination campaign seemed to be accompanied by an increase in all-cause mortality during the month following the vaccination campaign.

Dr. Pantazatos didn’t like that conclusion very much as it implied the unthinkable, and so he decided to do his own analysis based on the U.S. data (vaccinations and all-cause mortality), published by the CDC. And when he did his analysis using the U.S. data, it showed the same trend. His analysis of the CDC data showed that following a vaccination campaign in a given locality, there was an increase in all-cause mortality during the following month, followed by a decrease.

In Dr. Pantazatos’ opinion, the risk associated with COVID injections is comparable to the risk associated with getting COVID — if the risk associated with COVID is assessed at the high, early-in-the-pandemic level. And given that the two risks are comparable, and the injection risks seem to increase with each subsequent does — and the pharma companies are pushing for boosters from here into the horizon — he believes that we really need to discuss the VFR.

Dr. Pantazatos mentioned that even before 2020, he was well aware of the process of getting scientific works published in prestigious journals was tainted. He referred to the 2005 article in “PLOS Medicine” called, “Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical Companies” that talked about how exactly the journals are incentivized by pharma companies.

From myself, I would like to add the following quote from the Lancet:

“Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness,” wrote Richard Horton, the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet in 2015.

Dr. Pantazatos is not shy at all about sharing his analysis. He believes the issue is important, and speaking out is crucial. His message for other scientists is to find their voice and stop being silent.

Full transcript of the interview. https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/DrSpiroPantazatos-PerspectivesOnThePandemic.pdf

Loading comments...