Climb Uluru/Ayers Rock, says Elder

"The Uluru Kata-Tjuta National Park Board claim they have closed the climb because it is sacred... However, in the 1970's the owner of Uluru/Ayers Rock, Paddy Uluru and other senior Anangu men did not hold the climb or the summit as being especially culturally significant..."

How can a insignificant site suddenly become significant ?
What was the site called before Paddy Uluru ?
Why did the climb ban involve a communist fabian Bob Hawke ?
Why did the ownership transfer coincide with UNESCO world heritage status ?
How long before everywhere besides "smart cities" are classed as no-go zones?

UNESCO: "or threat from local administrative negligence.", "the local population around a site may benefit from significantly increased tourism revenue". Locals are bound by the UNESCO agreement or like "Liverpool, England, was officially stripped of its UNESCO designation after several warnings about detrimental new construction along its historic waterfront." Toursim revenue will decrease. I found articles that shows how world heritage status does not protect the sites because tourism increases, and original landscape can be ruined by hotels etcetera being build.

Right To Climb https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCb03FPrWmUO55l4R5WOpNA

on rumble and bitchute
https://rumble.com/c/AUSTRALIAOneCrownOnePeople
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/australiaonecrownonepeople/