Vaush on Thomas Sowell: Refuting Vaush's Pathetic Argument Part 2

Vaush illustrates to a tee beautifully in this video why it is a waste of time debating socialists. The disingenuous attempt at making so-called arguments, if you could even call it that, is the prime example of what you are up against. Throughout the entirety of his so-called argument, he never actually made any argument at all, he merely resorted to patronising one of the greatest economists of our time, Thomas Sowell.

Socialists are very good at moving the goal posts and then they claim you are strawmanning and mischaracterising their positions. Of course, they have to be dishonest to uphold such a dishonest political ideology, Thomas Sowell is right, it really does require extreme ignorance to uphold such a political position, the failure of socialism has been so blatant it requires intellectual degradation to reach such a position, even wilful ignorance.

This being the first video I've properly watched of his it is easy to tell what kind of person he is. I would know, I've argued with his kind a hundred times over, you're dealing with the type of person who flat out refuses facts, reason and logic, a person who thinks simply ridiculing and calling someone 'stupid' is an argument, when in real fact, it isn't. Not once did he make an attempt to critique the arguments Thomas Sowell made, rather, bases it off the fact he said socialism doesn't work, which is correct, it doesn't.

Like Kevin D. Williamson rightly quoted:

"Idealistic socialists in the West usually will tell you that "socialism" is anything other than what actual socialist governments have achieved in the real world."

Exactly, because the socialism they claim has never existed, not once; not in the Ukraine "totalitarian" territory that they tried to call 'free,' most certainly not in the terror regime of Catalonia in the 1930s immediately following the collapse of the government whereby a committee acted as a government and gave freed criminals from prison special privileged positions to terrorise innocent people, and most certainly not the Paris Commune where they used violence against private business owners.

Apparently you are "mischaracterising" their positions by not living up to what is in their head, whilst they bat aside the most common dictionary definitions of socialism and ignore that those definitions live up to the socialism you have seen in the real world. Again, like I've stated many times before, socialists refuse to accept practice over theory, rather, they think their theories are of greater importance.

Out of the responses I have made on people, at least the likes of Non-Compete, Second Thought, Viki1999, and believe it or not, Jason Unruhe, made an attempt providing their own arguments. Vaush doesn't, instead, he pretends it's an argument to belittle someones character and call them an idiot. This coming from a guy who clearly hasn't read a single word of what Thomas Sowell has written in his books.

*Follow Me on Social Media:*
• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LibertarianViewsScottyM
• Twitter: https://twitter.com/ScottCJMcKelvie
• Parler: https://parler.com/#/user/LibertarianViewsScottyM
• Gab: https://gab.com/LibertarianScot
• Minds: https://www.minds.com/LibertarianScot/
• MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/scottmckelvie
• WordPress Blog: https://libertarianviewswithscottym.wordpress.com/
• LBRY/Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LibertarianViewsScottyM:6
• Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-390494
• BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/egfCIS1DbaBM/

*You can also support me here on Patreon:*
https://www.patreon.com/LibertarianViewsScottyM