Premium Only Content

What is the Free-Rider Problem? Economical explanation
From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-rider_problem
In the social sciences, the free-rider problem is a type of market failure that occurs when those who benefit from resources, public goods (such as public roads or hospitals), or services of a communal nature do not pay for them or under-pay. Free riders are a problem because while not paying for the good (either directly through fees or tolls or indirectly through taxes), they may continue to access or use it. Thus, the good may be under-produced, overused or degraded. Additionally, it has been shown that despite evidence that people tend to be cooperative by nature, the presence of free-riders cause this prosocial behaviour to deteriorate, perpetuating the free-rider problem.
The free-rider problem in social science is the question of how to limit free riding and its negative effects in these situations. Such an example is the free-rider problem of when property rights are not clearly defined and imposed. The free-rider problem is common with public goods which are non-excludable and non-rivalrous. Non-excludable means that non-payers cannot be stopped from getting use of or benefits from the good. Non-rival consumption stipulates that the use of a good or service by one consumer, does not reduce its availability for another consumer. These characteristics of a public good results in there being little incentive for consumers to contribute to a collective resource as they enjoy its benefits.
A free rider may enjoy a non-excludable and non-rivalrous good such as a government-provided road system without contributing to paying for it. Another example is if a coastal town builds a lighthouse, ships from many regions and countries will benefit from it, even though they are not contributing to its costs, and are thus "free riding" on the navigation aid. A third example of non-excludable and non-rivalrous consumption would be a crowd watching fireworks. The number of viewers, whether they paid for the entertainment or not, does not diminish the fireworks as a resource. In each of these examples, the cost of excluding non-payers would be prohibitive, while the collective consumption of the resource does not decrease how much is available.
Although the term "free rider" was first used in economic theory of public goods, similar concepts have been applied to other contexts, including collective bargaining, antitrust law, psychology, political science, and vaccines. For example, some individuals in a team or community may reduce their contributions or performance if they believe that one or more other members of the group may free ride.
-
17:08
Joe Pags
3 years agoWHAT Is Biden's Problem?
536 -
1:11
1SolProtocol
3 years agoWhat is 1Sol? Simple Explanation.
39 -
2:17:35
TheSaltyCracker
8 hours agoThe Charlie Kirk Effect ReeEEStream 9-21-25
111K299 -
2:03:07
vivafrei
8 hours agoEp. 283: Charlie Kirk Memorial and other Stuff in the Law World
210K158 -
9:13:12
The Charlie Kirk Show
19 hours agoLIVE NOW: Building A Legacy, Remembering Charlie Kirk
2.15M916 -
1:55:20
The White House
11 hours agoPresident Trump Participates in the Memorial Service for Charlie Kirk
99.2K90 -
1:02:41
Sarah Westall
10 hours agoDomestic Terror Operation: Death Threats, Smear Campaigns, Gang Stalking w/ Journalist Sarah Fields
52.2K9 -
1:51:40
Nerdrotic
10 hours ago $17.58 earnedGobekli Tepe Discovery and "Reconstruction" | Forbidden Frontier #118
84.3K10 -
29:07
Tactical Advisor
10 hours agoATF Changes Ruling on SBR & Tacpack unboxing | Vault Room Live Stream 039
93.8K18 -
2:00
From Zero → Viral with AI
16 hours ago $4.80 earnedAre You Being Left Behind? Why AI Marketing is No Longer Optional
50.7K8