DEBUNKING The Left's Lie About "A Well-Regulated" Militia || 2A Explained

The Supreme Court recently struck down an oppressive New York gun law in their decision in the case "New York Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen." This law required citizens to demonstrate a special cause to exercise their right to bear arms in public. Before the Court's ruling, a New York bureaucrat could prohibit New Yorkers from carrying weapons around in public on a whim. But in a 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Clearence Thomas, the rights-violating law is now nullified.

Various left-wing politicians called the ruling "dangerous" and said it would complicate police work. Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) even vowed to keep vigorously pushing for gun restrictions. President Joe Biden even called the ruling "disappointing." The Department of Justice (DOJ) said they "respectfully disagreed" with the ruling. Many leftist wing Twitter users began using the term "well-regulated militia" within the second amendment to justify gun control. Mr. Watson explores the rich history surrounding the second amendment to prove two points: A. "Well-regulated" has no relation to gun control, and is instead was a political statement used to appeal to classical republicanism during the Founding. B. Anyone who claims "well-regulated" is a proxy for gun control is engaging in "proximity" ethics, which makes their claims philosophically erroneous. In doing this, Mr. Watson debunks leftist claims about the second amendment and the sacred right to bears arms found within the Constitution. He advances these very important arguments in the backdrop of the "bipartisan gun bill" that just passed in the U.S. Senate. Watch for more!

#scotus #secondamendment #gunlaws #nygunlaw #2A #Gunrights #NRA #guncontrol #politics #americanpolitics #revisionism #leftism #progressivism #conservatism #libertarianism

https://twitter.com/OfficialCWATSON/status/1540034971280326656