3 years ago

#BANDIDOSMC #HELLSANGELSMC #HELLSANGELS

413 Bikers Girls hosted its first annual ride out at Geraldine’s Live Music Bar and Grill in Chicopee to honor fallen riders.
“We are having a ride out for our fallen riders, meaning everyone who has fallen off, all the deceased people that we know,” said Sharon Valentin of 413 Biker Girls.
Valentin is one of the lead group members who helped put the first ride out together. They wanted to honor those who died in motorcycle accidents since the subject hits close to home for her.
“We’ve had a lot of close friends of ours pass away recently,” Valetin told us.
Many bikers from all over came out to support the cause as the group also honored those recovering or dealing with the after effects of a motorcycle accident.
00:00 Intro to show
02:26 Ridgerunners mc rally
03:57 413 Biker Girls
05:51 St Judes Hospital
06:46 DANVILLE ILLINOIS
07:48 Police Dismantle Bandidos Motorcycle Clubhouse
11:17 HELLS ANGELS MC OFF ONE OF THEIR OWN

🔥Trademark law does not let a trademark owner exert its trademark rights to stop news reporting about it or its products or services. You see proof of this everyday on the front pages of newspapers, the homepages of news websites, and countless blogs. Mainstream reporters and non-traditional journalists routinely report on earnings announcements, job lay-offs, and accounting scandals without worrying that they are infringing or diluting the trademarks of the companies and organizations they report on. There are several legal bases for this result: there is no risk of confusion between the news source and the trademark owner; nominative fair use protects this use of the trademark owner's mark; and the federal dilution statute expressly exempts "news reporting and news commentary" from a dilution claim. See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)(B). As noted above, one court has held that a blogger's critical commentary on a company qualified as "news reporting and news commentary." See BidZirk, LLC v. Smith, 2007 WL 3119445 (D.S.C. Oct. 22, 2007).
Trademark law does not permit a trademark owner to use its trademark rights to silence commentary and criticism. As with news reporting, courts recognize the important First Amendment values at stake and usually deny efforts by trademark owners to encroach on legitimate commentary and criticism. There are several legal bases for this result: there is no risk of confusion between the commentator and the trademark owner, and nominative fair use may protect this use of the trademark owner's mark. Additionally, courts are likely to find that your use of a trademark in commentary or criticism is "not in connection with a good or service" and "noncommercial" (the argument is especially strong for the latter category). But note that some courts may find your use of a trademark for criticism and commentary to be commercial if you host advertising or link to commercial websites. In any event, to defeat a trademark dilution claim, you do not even need to show that your use is noncommercial. The federal dilution statute creates a categorical exemption for "criticizing . . . or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of the famous mark owner." 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii). 🔥

#Harley
#HarleyDavidson
#Biker
#Protocol
#MotorcycleClub
#MC
#Tradition
#MotorcycleRally
#Motorcycles
#bikers
#outlawmotorcycleclubs
#bikerlife