Premium Only Content
The Dictatorship of Relativism
Franciscan University of Steubenville graduate theology programs: https://franciscan.university/bh/
Music written and generously provided by Paul Jernberg. Find out more about his work as a composer here: http://pauljernberg.com
Pope Benedict, when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, coined a phrase that I’ve returned to often in attempts to penetrate what exactly he meant by it. He described the moral landscape of modern society as a “dictatorship of relativism”.
What stood out to me, specifically, was the word dictatorship. Because I could always appreciate the logical problems with relativism, but I was always a bit struck why he associated it with such a specific term – dictatorship. What is the association?
So for a little helpful context, relativism, in this sense, means an individualistic and subjective approach to morality probably best summarized by George Bernard Shaw who said the “the only Golden rule is that there are no golden rules.”
The trend in popular thought in modernist Western society has been towards embracing a sense that morality is a social convention. There is no, at bottom, objective morality. What we think of as right or wrong is something that has emerged out of some societal consensus and then adapted.
The evidence for this claim is that because people don’t always agree about right and wrong, there must not be an actual, objective, right and wrong. But just because there can be multiple answers to a question, it doesn’t follow that there is no answer to the question.
I think of those order of operations math questions that you sometimes see posted on Facebook that bait people into blurting out the answer in the comments and if you read through them, you see an array of answers as diverse as Justin Trudeau’s cabinet.
But we don’t measure truth by the various answers that fallible human beings might offer to a problem. We ought to acknowledge that truth as well as morality is, generally, self evident and then we ought to do the hard work of trying to discover it.
But that requires an integrity and fortitude that modern people seem reluctant to confront. After all, it’s much easier to shy away from the high calling of moral virtue and then to console ourselves that there aren’t any true morals anyways, so we should just do whatever we want because it’s all just social convention.
-
9:38
Brian Holdsworth
2 years ago $0.03 earnedSell the Vatican, Feed the Poor?
3482 -
1:35:27
Inverted World Live
11 hours agoLost Satellites, Wild Horses, and 3i/Atlas
154K6 -
2:53:42
TimcastIRL
9 hours agoCandace Owens IMPLODES, Audience IN REVOLT, Claim SHES A CLONE Or GOT THE CALL | Timcast IRL
295K222 -
2:49:53
Barry Cunningham
9 hours agoLIVE BREAKING NEWS: President Trump Celebrates Hanukkah! And More News
74.6K14 -
1:29:40
Anthony Rogers
16 hours agoEpisode 394 - Isaac Butterfield
38.3K1 -
8:02
China Uncensored
15 hours agoChina Just Took The First Step Towards WAR
48.9K25 -
1:20:04
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoWhy Did Jesus Really Come? It’s NOT What You Think - Pedro Adao | FOC Show
43.8K4 -
2:18:25
DLDAfterDark
7 hours ago $4.36 earnedYo Homie! Is That My Briefcase?? EDC & Gun Talk - Blue Waffle Giveaway Pre Stream
37.1K4 -
1:34:23
Glenn Greenwald
11 hours agoSydney Shooting Exploited for Pro-Israel Censorship and Anti-Muslim Crackdowns; How Media DEI Was the Opposite of Diversity | SYSTEM UPDATE #559
146K135 -
1:09:01
MattMorseTV
10 hours ago $56.61 earned🔴Trump just handed Congress THE EVIDENCE.🔴
61.9K130