Dispelling the "Unfairness" Clouds - Attorney Analysis - Unsealed Part 2

In this series, we first analyzed the Virginia law surrounding public access to court documents, and explained that if Amber Heard thought that the things filed in the court would not be made public eventually, then she may have been ill-advised. After taking a first look at the 6,642 pages of documents unsealed by Judge Azcarate on July 13, 2022, now we'll dig deep and find out what's new, what's logical, and what's spin.

All unsealed documents are available for download here:
https://andreaburkhart.com/documents
(References in this video correspond to the document numbers on that web site.)

In this episode, our analysis of the unsealed files begins with answering the basic questions: Was the process fair? Do we see any indication that Amber Heard's complaints about the trial have merit? Is the jury verdict in jeopardy on appeal? Do any of these documents contain information that, had the jury known about it, would have probably changed the verdicts?

00:00 Intro
02:22 Amber's appeal doesn't look any better than it did before
04:02 Therapist notes not in the record, then not arguable on appeal
05:51 Excluding the UK judgment - just one dude's opinion
07:29 But we saw even more logical flaws in the UK judgment
11:58 "Mountains of evidence" excluded? Johnny had more limitations
12:21 Dr. Curry didn't get to do the interviews that Dr. Hughes did
14:02 Elaine opposed cameras when it would expose Amber's lies
15:30 No new indication of jury misconduct
15:55 Who poisoned the atmosphere, Elaine?
17:44 Any cloud on the verdict is dispelled by transparency
20:03 Johnny pushed for transparency from the beginning
21:34 Next video we'll identify the important new facts and new evidence

Part 0 - Unsealing Confidential Files - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRnHxH37gBc&list=PL8WXX74UtY78-Jxr5iShQALmp8We44SBl&index=1

Part 1 - First Look - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3lEHIq2UK4&list=PL8WXX74UtY78-Jxr5iShQALmp8We44SBl&index=2