Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Steven Crowder
3 hours ago🔴 Epstein Release Watch: What Happens When Trump Signs
26,744 watching -
56:05
The Rubin Report
1 hour agoDems Regret Epstein Files Release as Major Dem Names Come Out
5.18K40 -
LIVE
LFA TV
15 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | WEDNESDAY 11/19/25
3,949 watching -
LIVE
The Shannon Joy Show
1 hour ago“Quiet Piggy!” Trump Lashes Out At Reporter After Epstein Bill Passes Overwhelmingly In House!
218 watching -
LIVE
Grant Stinchfield
56 minutes agoDOJ’s Salacious Distraction: The REAL Epstein Intel Is Locked in Langley!
70 watching -
LIVE
LadyDesireeMusic
2 hours agoLive Piano Music & Convo & Requests
150 watching -
LIVE
Trumpet Daily
57 minutes agoTrumpet Daily LIVE | Nov. 19, 2025
360 watching -
LIVE
Viss
2 hours ago🔴LIVE - Pushing The Timer and Those in Our Path - Arc Raiders
145 watching -
LIVE
Daniel Davis Deep Dive
3 hours agoU.S. Missile Defense Deception /MIT Professor Ted Postol
63 watching -
LIVE
SOLTEKGG
2 hours agoLIVE - ARC RAIDERS — Full Aggression Mode
93 watching