Premium Only Content

Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
1:43:56
Tundra Tactical
12 hours ago $42.91 earned🛑LIVE NOW!! FBI Gets Caught LYING About Good Guys With Guns For 10 YEARS!!!!
63.3K7 -
2:12:01
BlackDiamondGunsandGear
2 days agoAFTER HOURS ARMORY / Antifa / Lies/ Prison time
38.3K2 -
2:12:00
DLDAfterDark
11 hours ago $15.86 earnedThe After Hours Armory! Tonight is The Chat's Chat! God, Guns, and Gear!
51.6K6 -
3:32:18
Mally_Mouse
14 hours ago🌶️ 🥵Spicy BITE Saturday!! 🥵🌶️- Let's Play: Phasmophobia
54.8K5 -
1:13:19
iCkEdMeL
10 hours ago $25.87 earnedChaos Explodes in Chicago & Portland | Feds Clash with Protesters!
60.7K33 -
21:54
Exploring With Nug
1 day ago $10.87 earnedScuba Diving Missing Person Search Leads to Discovery of Classic Cars!
72.4K20 -
8:06:32
Phyxicx
15 hours agoStar Wars: Movie Battles II Community Event hosted by ReaperAF95 - 10/4/2025
35.1K -
1:19:51
World2Briggs
13 hours ago $2.77 earnedThe US This Week
38.5K8 -
2:31:13
Joker Effect
10 hours ago"MAKE STREAMING GREAT AGAIN" - Brands Step Up Finally. Birth of Rumble Community. Taking Leadership
24.1K4 -
5:02:17
Illyes Jr Gaming
14 hours ago"Machine Gun" Takes On BLACK OPS 7 Beta DAY 3!!!
15K1