Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
DVR
The Rubin Report
1 hour agoHost Gets Visibly Angry as Scott Bessent Rips Him to Shreds in Front of NY Times Crowd
6.14K3 -
LIVE
iCkEdMeL
57 minutes ago🔴 BREAKING: Brian Cole Identified as DC Pipe Bomb Suspect — FBI Arrest
254 watching -
LIVE
LFA TV
14 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | THURSDAY 12/04/25
4,039 watching -
59:25
VINCE
3 hours agoFINALLY: Jan 6th Pipe Bomber Arrested? | Episode 181 - 12/04/25 VINCE
161K106 -
LIVE
Chad Prather
2 hours agoCandace Owens ACCEPTS TPUSA’s Debate Invitation + Dem Rep Instructs Military To REMOVE Trump?!
644 watching -
LIVE
Grant Stinchfield
51 minutes agoBiden’s Inner Circle Cracks! It's the Presidency That Wasn’t!
83 watching -
1:32:47
Graham Allen
3 hours agoCandace Owens vs TPUSA! It’s Time To End This Before It Destroys Everything Charlie Fought For!
126K548 -
Badlands Media
10 hours agoBadlands Daily: 12/4/25
32.2K4 -
2:14:23
Matt Kohrs
13 hours agoLive Trading Stock Market Open (Futures & Options) || The Matt Kohrs Show
22.8K -
2:59:21
Wendy Bell Radio
7 hours agoEnemy of the State
58.8K80