Omnipotence

No Contradiction. No fallacy. Please contact for .pdf.

With the common omnipotence argument one may argue that the initial conditions are set randomly OR may argue always the existence of a previous step: but then it is not necessarily clear what role the "divine oneness" has (Christ (pnuema), Creator). The argument ONLY leads to two possible outcomes: randomness OR infinite regression. The Omnipotence argument is logical, valid, and presents no fallacy. This is what I am trying to articulate and hope others sense.