AZ Election Judge - Voting Machines Were Programmed to Cheat !!, 3959

Good Monday morning. I’m Still reporting on the coup.

Has anyone else noticed this election cycle’s strange phenomenon where slow counting is happening in states which Republicans thought they would win?

For the most part, the Democrat states seemed to have no problems reporting their pro-democrat results in timely fashion. It’s like the Democrats want it to be known early and often that their candidates have taken an early lead.

The slow counting states all seem to be the ones where too many wrascly Wepublicans vote d in person on election day.

Yesterday, Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit put up a story that deepens suspicions that maybe this is some sort of new-fangled cheat deployed that only affects those who vote on election day, which is when more Republicans vote than Democrats.

Michele Swinick, an Election Day Judge in Maricopa County, AZ, spent election day working at a polling place called the Islamic Voting Center, located at 12125 E Via Linda, Scottsdale, AZ 85259.

According to Swinick, the Center has a significantly Republican makeup, as evidenced by the fact that she checked in very few Democrat voters all day.

According to reporter Tracy Beanz, who covered the story on Thursday:

“Swinick says that the tabulators all worked ‘perfectly’ during the test the night before the election. The problem with scanning began immediately with the first ballots.

So many ballots were rejected that voters were instructed to either keep trying, or drop their ballots in a different section called “Door 3”. Although Door 3 ballots were not supposed to be removed from that box until the polls closed, the Door 3 box started jamming from being filled to overflowing.

The problem was finally remedied when a technician arrived at the center between 3:30 and 4:00 Mountain Time and rebooted the machines, and so, they started to work correctly.

Ms. Swinick was told by an offsite supervisor to put all the unscanned, “door 3” ballots into an empty black bag, and label it “Misreads”, then sign it, seal it, then send the bag to the tabulation center to be counted.

Ms. Swinick told “UncoverDC” that the normal process she was trained to perform was that those unread ballots should have been run through the tabulators one more time before sending them to the center, but this procedure was not followed.

Maricopa County had set up a website to give voters assurance that their vote had been counted. However, according to Ms. Swinick the website was actually using a voter’s “check in” credentials when they are first handed their ballot, as proof of a tabulation – which takes place when the vote is actually recorded into the system – but Ms. Swinick knew that was not true.

“My roommate ran his ballot through the tabulators 15 times as one of the 1st voters at the Islamic Center. It would not read the ballot. He was forced to drop it in door #3.”

Apparently, this malfunction only occurred in heavily Republican polling stations because there were few reports of similar malfunctions in heavily-Democrat precincts. Some jokingly theorized that it could have been caused by a rare COVID variant set loose on unvaxxed GOP voters in Maricopa County.

Ms. Swinick arrived home here duties at the polls about 9pm Mountain time. About 10 pm, her roommate checked the county’s website to see if his vote had been counted. He reported that his vote had been tabulated. But Michele knew that was impossible because when she left the voting center, the “Door 3” ballots hadn’t even been picked up by the transport team yet.

“… this proves the reporting of his ballot being received & counted is actually based on his being checked into the Voting Center and him receiving a ballot to be cast—NOT his ballot being scanned and read through the tabulator or hand counted at the tabulation center.”

Michelle has been threatened with termination by her supervisor if she speaks out on what she saw on election day.

“If I find out you have gone on any podcasts, I will terminate you.”

Michelle gave her opinion to reporter Tracy Beanz on what was going on. She had apparently witnessed similar behavior during election 2020:

“In my opinion, the machines were programmed to do this, and it was all planned. The process and narrative, both machines and people. It was brilliantly done. They isolated the ballots to replace or not count them in 223 bags. The hard part for them in 2020 and during the primary was getting the ballots to match their manufactured machine count. This way, they have everything isolated in the bags.”

I’m still reporting from just outside the citadel of world freedom. Good day.