Child Victims of Contested Relationships

This Child Is About to Be Irreversibly Jabbed & Needs Legal Representation

Koke is a grandmother in California whose daughter is going through a child custody nightmare. The mother is against having their child vaccinated, while the father is pro-vaccination.
The child has not reached the age of majority yet (18) and is being pulled from both sides by the legal system and the parents.
When a child is placed into a situation where an experimental shot has been rushed to market with little testing and has resulted in thousands of injuries and deaths, how is the child to legally object without being able to be represented in court on his/her own? What if the long-term consequences of the shot are certain injury or death? Who is liable? Is the process irreversible? Who is ultimately harmed? The child is the person ultimately harmed. Who represents the child’s interests in avoiding such possible harm?

This is a tough legal question within Family Law that is being disputed in many U.S. states, and may eventually end in the Supreme Court of the United States. And, securing the services of an attorney is extremely expensive!

Koke is hoping to help her grandchild avoid such possible injury or death.

If this were your child, and you were to ask the court what is in the child’s best interests, which side would you take?

Please give a Give-SenGo donation to Koko, so that she can prevent a possible tragic outcome for her grandchild while the issue is being fought out in court.
Please share the link with others who might also help in this crucial issue!
The link will appear below. Thank you!