Inventor of PCR test Dr Kary Mullis quotes on the RT-PCR test.. ( Covid rapid testing used also just as false and misleading. These techniques were chosen for a reason, cheap and easily manipulated) "Anything can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test" "PCR test was not made to detect any type of infectious disease" "It can't tell you that you're sick" https://rumble.com/vdxqwb-red-bull-tests-positive-to-covid.html

In May Of 1996, Gary Null Interviewed Nobel Prize-winning Chemist Kary Mullis On His Views About The Scientific Establishment, HIV, AIDS, And Many Other Issues. "Public Health Policy In The U.S. Has Been Dictated By Anthony Fauci For Over Three Decades." His Pronouncements On Covid-19 Which Are Taken As Gospel By The Media And The Medical Establishment Bear A Striking Resemblance To His Pronouncements On The AIDS Epidemic. The Primary Diagnostic Tool Used For Determining A Virus Infection Is The PCR Test Which Anthony Fauci Has Helped To Establish As The Gold Standard For Testing. Kary Mullis, The Inventor Of The PCR Test Has Stated That No Infection Of Illness Can Be Accurately Diagnosed With PCR. He Discussed His Thoughts On Dr. Fauci And The Scientific And Medical Establishments With Dr. Gary Null In 1996." Dr. Kary Banks Mullis: Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 - August 7, 2019) Was An American Biochemist. In Recognition Of His Invention Of The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Technique, He Shared The 1993 Nobel Prize In Chemistry With Michael Smith And Was Awarded The Japan Prize In The Same Year. His Invention Became A Central Technique In Biochemistry And Molecular Biology, Described By The New York Times As "Highly Original And Significant, Virtually Dividing Biology Into The Two Epochs Of Before PCR And After PCR." If You Like This Content and Want More, Follow Me on Telegram: https://t.me/JustDudeChannel

Kary Mullis excerpt:
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus 

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/

Our talk focused on AIDS. Though Mullis has not been particularly vocal about his HIV skepticism, his convictions have not, to his credit, been muddled or softened by his recent success and mainstream acceptability. He seems to revel in his newly acquired power. “They can’t pooh-pooh me now, because of who I am,” he says with a chuckle – and by all accounts, he’s using that power effectively. When ABC’s “Nightline” approached Mullis about participating in a documentary on himself, he instead urged them to focus their attention on the HIV debate. “That’s a much more important story,” he told the producers, who up to that point had never acknowledged the controversy. In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources. The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.” But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done. “I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.” He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.” While many people, even within the ranks of the HIV dissidents, have of late tried to distance themselves from the controversial Duesberg, Mullis defends him passionately and seems genuinely concerned about his fate. “I was trying to stress this point to the ABC people” he says, “that Peter has been abused seriously by the scientific establishment, to the point where he can’t even do any research. Not only that, but his whole life is pretty much in disarray because of this, and it is only because he has refused to compromise his scientific moral standards. There ought to be some goddamn private foundation in the country, that would say, ‘Well, we’ll move in where the NIH [National Institutes of Health] dropped off. We’ll take care of it. You just keep right on saying what you’re saying, Peter. We think you’re an asshole, and we think you are wrong, but you’re the only dissenter, and we need one, because it’s science, it’s not religion.’ And that was one of the reasons why I cooperated with ABC.” “I am waiting to be convinced that we’re wrong,” Mullis continues. “I know it ain’t going to happen. But if it does, I will tell you this much – I will be the first person to admit it. A lot of people studying this disease are looking for the clever little pathways they can piece together, that will show how this works. Like, ‘What if this molecule was produced by this one and then this one by this one, and then what if this one and that one induces this one’ – that stuff becomes, after two molecules, conjecture of the rankest kind. People who sit there and talk about it don’t realize that molecules themselves are somewhat hypothetical, and that their interactions are more so, and that the biological reactions are even more so. You don’t need to look that far. You don’t discover the cause of something like AIDS by dealing with incredibly obscure things. You just look at what the hell is going on. Well, here’s a bunch of people that are practicing a new set of behavioral norms. Apparently, it didn’t work because a lot of them got sick. That’s the conclusion. You don’t necessarily know why it happened. But you start there.” http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Document:Farber_interviews_Mullis

That was a historical detour, shared in hopes of rooting this conversation historically. When you see the word “cases” on your TV screen, in this world that has now been hijacked by one single event, one dread, one Idol, you will be forgiven for thinking those are cases of Covid-19.