How California's Recent Loss Summarizes Gun Control in a Nutshell

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the recent beat down that the State of California took in the matter of Miller v. Bonta, which challenges the Constitutionality of California Civil Rule 1021.11, likely to be known someday as California's Unconstitutional fee shifting law. Today we learn that the State of California attempted to argue "no harm no foul" as they "really didn't ever intend on enforcing the law." This, of course, begs the question, why did you pass it to begin with? Well the Honorable Judge Benetiz in San Diego was not too persuaded by the State's arguments and has denied their motion to dismiss this lawsuit. This mean that this case will proceed and be decided on the merits. What does all of this mean to you? Learn this and more and arm yourself with education today.

News Items:

California Judge Acts to Uphold First and Second Amendment Protections. https://www.ammoland.com/2022/12/california-judge-acts-to-uphold-first-and-second-amendment-protections/#axzz7mjKg9HeF
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicable Statutes:

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 1021.11https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-code-of-civil-procedure/part-2-of-civil-actions/title-14-of-miscellaneous-provisions/chapter-6-of-costs/section-102111-effective-112023-attorneys-fees-and-costs-of-prevailing-party-to-be-paid
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

Check Out our Bullet Point Series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTYlAL5t-3aPwsSwmze-Dw_ev5b7PgNpe
________________________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington