How the Supreme Court Just Boxed in the EPA, and What That Means for the ATF

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the last case to come from this years blockbuster Supreme Court term. While normally we don't cover environmental case law here at WGL, the smack down handed to the Environmental Protection Agency by SCOTUS, the reasons for it, and the reasons for which they were acting outside their scope, are identical to the issues presented every single day by the ATF. The single greatest criticism of the ATF by lawful and responsible gun owners is that they act as if they are Congress and literally make laws up as they go. Well, that is exactly what the EPA was doing and the results are enlightening.

If you are the new Director of the ATF, take notice that your pistol brace rule, ruling on Rare Breed Triggers and ruling on solvent traps, receivers and 80% lowers are all subject to Constitutional scrutiny. Learn more and arm yourself with education today.
______________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf

Separation of Powers, Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/separation_of_powers

The Constitution, Annotated. Separation of Powers. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.6-2-2/ALDE_00000031/

Check Out our Bullet Point Series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTYlAL5t-3aPwsSwmze-Dw_ev5b7PgNpe
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington