Dr Michael Palmer summarized the evidence from autopsies and bio-distribution studies, which reinforced the mechanisms described by Dr Bhakdi. In short, the injected mRNA vaccines can cause damages all around the body over an extended period of time, and such vaccine damage is not rare.

Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD, PE, presents the statistical data on the adverse events associated with COVID vaccines. The VARS data has shown that the COVID vaccines can increase the risk of shingles, myocarditis, and other disorders.

With Meryl Nass, MD, and panel discussion of Session I The Fundamental Flaws of mRNA Vaccine Technology For more information: https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/

For more information: https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/

Philipp Kruse has been practicing law in Switzerland since 1997. He and his team have filed 22 ordinary court proceedings against all COVID-related mandates since December 2020. In July 2022, they filed a criminal complaint against SWISSMEDIC, the Swiss regulatory authority on drugs and vaccines. In this video, Philipp Kruse explains the substance and the legal strategy of this criminal complaint against SWISSMEDIC. He describes, by way of example, the adverse effects suffered by a former professional soccer player after she was injected with an mRNA vaccine (5:30). Kruse argues that the disinformation dispensed by the SWISSMEDIC, together with political and social pressures, push healthy people into a dangerous medical experiment, which leads to long-term health damage. At the same time, doctors and the public deny entirely the adverse effects caused by the vaccines and fail to help people suffering from them, which causes further physical and emotional harm to these victims. Mr. Kruse gives his reasons for filing this lawsuit against SWISSMEDIC instead of Pfizer (8:10). SWISSMEDIC has severely and repeatedly violated its essential legal duties and due diligence. He lists the three core allegations in detail (14:10): Unlawful "temporary approval." Deception of the population Inadequate market surveillance He also presents the timeline of the misdemeanors and violations committed by SWISSMEDIC, showing that the agency continued to extend the authorizations despite the growing warning signals and accumulating evidence of adverse effects (15:40). At the end of his presentation, Mr. Kruse summarizes what he and his team will do next and provides general guidance on applying his work to various jurisdictions. For further information on this important lawsuit, please visit https://corona-complaint.ch. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Ray L. Flores II is a health freedom attorney at Children's Health Defense (CHD). He starts his presentation by discussing the current legal situation in the USA. In his opinion, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act is the most dangerous threat to the public because the Act protects vaccine manufacturers and any providers who distribute and inject vaccines from liability. The legal system presents numerous hurdles to those seeking redress for vaccine damage; for example, most courts in the USA are uncomfortable dealing with scientific questions (2:00). Nevertheless, there are ways to overcome these obstructions; one of them is through Worker's Compensation (1:20). Another urgent matter is the new California legislation which makes it punishable for physicians and other healthcare workers to disagree with any official medical guidance given by the state government, either publicly or in their advice to patients. Attorneys at CHD are now filing the lawsuits against this legislation on two grounds (3:50): 1. There is no difference between freedom of speech for doctors and the general public; 2. The scientific narrative has flip-flopped over time, as laid out in the document written by Dr. Sanjay Verma (see links below). Resources mentioned in this video: Workers' Compensation https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/workers-compensation-covid-vaccine-injury-victims/ Freedom of Speech for Doctors https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-california-doctors-covid-misinformation-lawsuit/ Ever Shifting Narrative Declaration of Sanjay Verma, M.D. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/4-2-Verma.pdf This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Catherine Austin Fitts first introduce investigative journalist Corey Lynn and Attorney Carolynn A. Betts Esq. Corey starts her talk (1:40) with the history of the International Organizations Immunities Act. According to her, this US federal law is the key mechanism to allow international organizations to run both above and outside the law in the US. Corey Lynn discloses more treaties and headquarters agreements that grant specific organizations similar immunities, for example, Gates-founded Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi) and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). She also discusses the immunity of Big Pharm from lawsuits for vaccine damage. For further reading, please visit https://www.coreysdigs.com/u-s/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-1/. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Catherine Austin Fitts with Carolyn Betts MBA JD. Carolyn first discusses (1:00) the book by Adam Lebor:Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World(PublicAffairs, 2013). She finds the section on World War II especially shocking: “Two guys who were from England and Germany and remained fast friends during World War II came up with the idea of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).” According to Catherine, the real goal of these bankers who created BIS was to create a global bank that has “sovereign immunity” and can not “be prosecuted and questioned.” The two then discuss the following issues: 1. The BIS has extended its sovereign immunity to protect its member banks during the financial crisis and from prosecution. The New York Fed and HSBC are cited as examples (3:15). 2. The $21 trillion that have gone “missing” from the US government (6:20). Catherine speculates that the only way that the US government could balance the books in the face of this enormous theft is by lowering the life expectancy of the population. 3. Additional agencies and companies have been granted exemption from liability or even sovereign immunity status, particularly in healthcare. Carolyn Betts believes that the lawsuits against COVID-19 measures may be “the way to educate people nationally and internationally about what's been going on and what's been leading up to where we are today.” Catherine Austin Fitts adds, “I dare any international organization to march into court and say that their sovereign immunity gives them the power to implement mass atrocity and murder worldwide.” Carolyn agrees: “I just don't see how you can say there's sovereign immunity for murder.” Carolyn's book review on Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World (PublicAffairs, 2013): https://home.solari.com/book-review-tower-of-basel-the-shadowy-history-of-the-secret-bank-that-runs-the-world-by-adam-lebor/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Evidence of Conspiracy to Commit Mass Murder by the pharma manufacturers, US Department of Defense (DOD), US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) by Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova. COVID “vaccines” are weapons – according to secretive yet official policies of the US government. This video is a must-watch. Sasha Latypova dives deep into the legal and administrative side of US COVID policies, based on publicly available materials. The video starts with Catherine Austin Fitts introducing Sasha Latypova and Meryl Nass, who joined a subsequent discussion. Sasha then summarizes the state of the evidence on COVID vaccines: they are toxic by design, they lack safety and efficacy. Manufacturing standards are lousy, and policy malignant (3:00). These observations raise the question: 1. Why has there been no remedial action by the regulators or the courts? (4:30) Sasha’s answer is startling: regulators and courts have not taken action, because the COVID vaccines are not merely covered by Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), but are also classified as “military countermeasures.” She then explains the critical legal rules involving EUA countermeasures in detail (7:30): • 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): Use of EUA countermeasures “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation,” and therefore, “are not subject to FDA regulation.” This law is even cited in the FDA’s own draft guidance, which means that the FDA is fully aware that it has no legal competence in this case. • 21 USC 360bbb-3(c): EUA countermeasures issued at HHS Secretary's discretion are NOT required to meet any of the standards which conventionally regulate pharmaceutical products. Sasha says that all the interactions between the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA have no legal relevance at all – “vaccine development and approval is a performance art and voluntary.” 2. Who really sets the rules for the vaccine roll-out? (11:30) According to Sasha, the National Security Council (NSC) is in charge of the COVID Policy, not the public health-related agencies. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) leads the federal pandemic response, not HHS. The HHS mainly plays an information and propaganda role, “pretending that they are doing something over which they don't have the authority.” 3. Who is REALLY developing and manufacturing these injections? (13:30) Sasha asserts that NSC, DOD, and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) are in charge, not the Pharma companies. She concludes with some hard-hitting statements: "BARDA also was very proud of being able to accelerate the clinical development by breaking the law." “BARDA alone took over the entire pharmaceutical industry in the United States.” "COVID-19 Injections are weapons intended to harm." Alexandra LATYPOVA is a serial entrepreneur and a founder of iCardiac Technologies. For her work regarding COVID vaccines, please visit https://sashalatypova.substack.com/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Lawyers Philipp Kruse, Dr. Renate Holzeisen, and retired Paediatrician Dr. Ros Jones MD joined Ray L Flores to discuss their perspectives on the legal landscapes in their respective jurisdictions. Dr. Renate Holzeisen described a ruling in Italy that upheld the constitutionality of Italy’s vaccine mandates based on ‘science.’ She considered the decision “a huge scandal,” given that COVID vaccines do not prevent contagiousness, which negates the scientific rationale for vaccine mandates in the first place. However, she said that admissions by the EMA and other authorities that the evidence does not support vaccination as a contagion control would be valuable to future legal actions. Dr. Ros Jones described procedural and cultural barriers to legally challenging the vaccination of children in the UK. These included the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) offloading responsibility back and forth between them, court applications being deemed either too premature before vaccine approval or too late afterward, and a legal culture whereby the court did not evaluate the quality of scientific evidence behind official decisions, as long as “experts” had been consulted. Ray L. Flores noted that in the US, cases were often similarly “discharged through a trapdoor,” for instance, via dismissal or based on standing, enabling judges to avoid engaging with scientific evidence and challenging questions. Philipp Kruse described a similar experience in Switzerland, whereby courts repeatedly declined to hear scientific evidence from expert witnesses. In terms of constructive ways forward, Dr. Jones reflected on her experience that, despite the intransigence of government authorities and courts, “I think parents are listening… For the five to 11 [age group], just seven percent [in the UK] have had two doses. So I think the parents are voting with their feet.” She added that the COVID vaccine has only had around a 2.5 percent uptake in newborns to four-year-olds in the US, demonstrating a similar pattern. Renate Holzeisen concluded by stressing that as public opinion changes in this way, judges and prosecutors are more willing to do their job. Ray Flores agreed, adding, “the courts follow the culture.” This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

In this video, two doctors, Dr. Thomas Binder from Switzerland and Dr. Ryan Cole from the US, recounted how they were persecuted during the COVID crisis. On the evening of Easter Saturday in 2020, Dr. Binder was "brutally arrested" by a 60-strong "hardcore anti-terrorism unit with machine guns." Upon finding no basis for arrest, the Swiss anti-terrorism unit called in a medical examiner, who issued the concocted diagnosis of 'corona insanity' and placed Dr. Binder in a padded cell for 36 hours. Next, Dr. Ryan Cole described his experiences of ill-treatment by the mainstream media, insurance companies, and various medical boards. Taylor Hudak concluded that we are witnessing "the weaponization of psychology and mental health to demonize dissenting voices. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

PLEASE NOTE: This is an earlier version of an updated video, with two errors of misattribution corrected. To view the updated video please click here: https://rumble.com/v27e1tq-d4ce-5th-symposium-the-psychology-of-covid-19-atrocities-upated.html Thank you. The video summarizes the Unlimited Hangout article, Covid-19: Mass Formation or Mass Atrocity?, analyzing the abuses enacted under COVID-19 through the lens of the psychology of mass atrocity. It stresses the dangers of demonising active bystanders as 'conspiracy theorists', and the importance of holding atrocity's instigators to account. The video summary, with audiovisuals by Daniel Broudy and text by David Hughes, Valerie Kyrie and Daniel Broudy, contains compelling footage of state violence and vaccine casualties never-to-be seen on prime-time TV. To read the article, visit https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

In this video, Dr. Meryl Nass first discussed how totalitarian control of the medical profession was achieved. Strategies include: 1. Putting public health agencies under control. 2. Bribing medical organizations. 3. Controlling the media. 4. Passing new laws to criminalize doctors' speech (California's AB2098 and British Columbia's Bill 36). She cited two organizations acting as police for "misinformation," the newly sprung-up No License for Disinformation and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Next, Dr. Nass gave an overview of the legal proceedings in the US and laid out the strategies to fight back, as "hundreds or thousands of doctors have been investigated or lost their licenses." She discussed the following cases: 1. Legal challenges to California's AB2098 law; 2. Cases of bodily autonomy supported by the US courts; 3. An opinion by the Nebraska Attorney General regarding Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin; 4. A case brought by the Attorneys General of Missouri and Louisiana and the New Civil Liberties Alliance against illegal collaboration between federal agencies (including the FBI) and social media companies; 5. A vital victory by eminent French infectious diseases expert Christian Perronne in October 2022. Dr. Nass encouraged doctors to familiarise themselves with the First Amendment of the US Constitution, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. During the panel discussion, Dr. Liz Evans joined Taylor Hudak and Dr. Meryl Nass in discussing the dangers of weaponizing terms such as 'disinformation' and 'misinformation' to suppress scientific debates. "Don't wait for the court to make the decision," concluded Dr. Nass, to which Dr. Evans agreed. Dr. Evans also added that the emerging laws criminalizing doctors' speech would prevent doctors from abiding by their codes of ethics. She stressed that medical ethics existed to protect patients and that medicine without ethics was unsafe for us all. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Polly Tommey of CHD.TV opened the session by introducing Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a medical doctor, former politician, and expert on public health and pandemics, who spoke about the foundations of democracy, the mechanisms of its erosion, and core principles for rebuilding democratic governance once again. Dr. Wodarg shared a formula for resilient democracies centered around transparency as a function of societal size and complexity. Transparency, he stressed, is the critical ingredient for safeguarding democracy, such that governance occurs in the interests of citizens rather than those in power. With a near-total absence of transparency in our vast and immensely complex global societies and organizations, Dr. Wodarg noted that we were witnessing “almost everything institutionally corrupted.” Catherine Austin Fitts and Dr. Meryl Nass joined Polly Tommey and Dr. Wodarg to discuss his presentation. Catherine Austin Fitts encouraged viewers to realize that the things we do, and the actions we take, are much more powerful than many people realize. In “everything you think and everything you do,” she said, “say no to darkness and yes to light.” This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Michael Palmer, MD, rounded off the symposium with a message to doctors, nurses, patients, and lawyers. Finally, Catherine Austin Fitts read Vermont Royster's In Hoc Anno Domini (In This Year of Our Lord), written for the Wall Street Journal in 1949 at Christmas, as the world recovered from a devastating war. The book describes Saul of Tarsus' conversion and emancipation from a world in bondage, with a message to stand fast in liberty, render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and "be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage." "For one to be free all will be free. This means you. Choose freedom, so that tyranny cannot and will not stand. May your light arise and break through the darkness today, and throughout the New Year and all of 2023. " "From Doctors for Covid Ethics and all the groups that have helped us tonight, from CHD.TV, UK Column, and CHD Europe, good night and God bless." This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

Journalist Taylor Hudak MA opened the symposium by noting that as we approach the end of 2022, “it is clear that we are at a critical point in our fight for freedom, bodily autonomy and human rights.” Doctors for Covid Ethics’ documentation of evidence that mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage has gone viral, she said, “which demonstrates the manifest shift in the public discourse” underway. It is a shift that inspired the motto for this our fifth symposium: In the Midst of Darkness Light Prevails. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.

This video summarizes the Unlimited Hangout article, Covid-19: Mass Formation or Mass Atrocity?, analyzing the abuses enacted under COVID-19 through the lens of the psychology of mass atrocity. It stresses the dangers of demonising active bystanders as 'conspiracy theorists', and the importance of holding atrocity's instigators to account. The video summary, with audiovisuals by Daniel Broudy and text by David Hughes, Valerie Kyrie and Daniel Broudy, contains compelling footage of state violence and vaccine casualties never-to-be seen on prime-time TV. To read the article, visit https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/. This is an updated version of the video, with two errors of misattribution corrected, posted on Jan 27, 2023