FAA Changes Heart Health Standards For Pilots: Why?

Clint Griess, Founder of the Commoner Law Group, and Deana Sacks, Revolution Radio "Counterspeech" show host (every Tuesday 8-9 PM EST live in Studio B) and President of Lord Advocates, first discuss the January 13, 2023 New York decision in Medical Professionals for Informed Consent et al. v. Mary T. Bassett et al. where the court ruled that the COVID-19 so-called "vaccine" injection mandate was "arbitrary and capricious" because the injections do not work as traditional "vaccines," i.e., they do not prevent transmission (or infection). Griess and Sacks then discuss the new FAA rule that lowers the bar for pilots to be able to fly relative to heart health. Cardiologist Thomas Levy has opined that the very high level of COVID-19 injection injuries have caused the FAA to relax standards because so many pilots are showing signs of myocarditis and other serious heart injuries after receiving COVID-19 shots - which increase the risk of a heart attack. One study out of Puerto Rico revealed that a whopping 70% of people showed signs of cardiac injury post COVID-19 vaccination. The new FAA rule puts the public (passengers on flights) at risk because pilots with heart attack risks that previously prevented them from flying are now allowed to fly under the relaxed new standard (which has been kept very quiet by the mainstream media). Griess and Sacks then discuss some ideas for assuring that medical mandates like the COVID-19 injection mandates are rejected immediately in the future, which depend on the public becoming more aware, more awake, and more willing to stand up against corrupt governments and to help themselves legally.