Do Forensic Analytics Demonstrate 9/11 Twin Towers & Building 7 as Demolition Projects? ~ You Decide

On today's Roundtable discussion in our 9/11 Court of Public Opinion, Richard Gage demonstrates compelling evidence with sources, that bring into question the accuracy of the NIST 9/11 Report for Building 7 and the Twin Towers collapse.

It is presented here for the viewers to discern for themselves whether additional investigation is warranted, or the NIST report remains accurate “as is”.

As the Founder and former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth... a total of 3,600 credentialed Architects & Engineers, (thus far) have signed onto a petition demanding a new NIST investigation.

AE911TRUTH.ORG also funded a study of the collapse of WTC Building 7 through the University of Alaska/Fairbanks. Professor Leroy Hulsey (Emeritus) led the team, and spent 4 years of meticulous forensic analysis. They concluded that the NIST Report was deeply flawed.

Richard Gage discusses the Study and the evidence of a controlled demolition of ALL THREE World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11. Basically, Building 7 is the proverbial "Smoking Gun" as stated by Professor Hulsey.

Richard Gage, AIA, is an architect of 30 years, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder and former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He is now independent, along with his wife & assistant Gail at RichardGage911.org

Consider making a sizable donation to help us work together in bringing out the truth against formidable odds: https://c-vine.com/donate-now/