Peter later removed from all further shows because i questioned the WW 2 official story

The corruption being uncovered in the Indian bands in Canada is displaying a microcosm of how money and power are used to control people in leadership positions everywhere. The Chiefs of the bands and band council are a small version of what happens everywhere on a provincial, federal and international level. It's all the same vector of control. They are being used as patsies for the UN to bring in the next big step towards global government as outlined by The Club of Rome in 1967. It's also where they invented "climate change". The Anglo-American Zionist establishment has perfected this over hundreds, if not thousands of years. Get a man addicted to money and power and he will do anything he is told. It's nothing new and it is not exclusive to Native bands. Corruption is at every level of government institutions. The fools that are participating in the Truth and Reconciliation racket are just the latest patsies of the day to execute the wishes of globalist elites and central bankers. OneBC Caucus is proud to present Making a Killing: Reconciliation, Genocide, and Plunder in Canada. Making a Killing is a feature documentary film exposing the massive scandal behind the taking of wealth, land, and power from the Canadian public to benefit indigenous tribes. It debunks the worst lie in Canadian history: the lie that 215 bodies were found at the Kamloops Residential School and that Canadians committed a mass murder against indigenous children. Making a Killing is the first documentary film produced by an elected caucus.

https://www.shelaw.ca/ [email protected]

The Secret Life of Canada - You do Not Want to Miss This (Share https://rumble.com/v6au8a7-the-secret-life-of-canada-you-do-not-want-to-miss-this-share.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=8846f3f3-fb7d-4ab5-8c2c-a01997f70c4e No Referendum Required: Our Legal Rights Under the Statute of Westminster Are Already Established https://rumble.com/v6sxlsn-no-referendum-required-our-legal-rights-under-the-statute-of-westminster-ar.html If Alberta truly wants an Independent Nation you MUST Share this Video https://rumble.com/v6synyt-if-alberta-truly-wants-an-independent-nation-you-must-share-this-video.html https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ FACTS https://constitutionalconventions.ca/category/historic-facts/ CANADAS HISTORY Mr. Kuhl’s final year serving as a politician, he brought forward Canada’s constitutional problems in the House of Commons. Here is the transcript of that entry. CANADA A COUNTRY WITHOUT A CONSTITUTION https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mr.-W.-F.-KUHL-Constitutional-Crisis.pdf Ho Canada Rogers Smith Many Known so Little About so Much HO, CANADA ! by R. Rogers Smith, https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ho_Canada_Rogers_Smith.pdf Walter Kuhl: Canada A Country Without A Constitution https://rumble.com/v26rfc0-walter-kuhl-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=190dccaf-e206-4097-8978-7189b61e790d Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a CANADIANS NEED TO BE EDUCATED ABOUT CANADA’S HISTORY https://rumble.com/vv14sk-canadians-need-to-be-educated-about-canadas-history.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a No Treason The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner https://rumble.com/vwqbr8-no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority-by-lysander-spooner.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Do You Really Know The Fact About UNDRIP! https://rumble.com/v27vm2r-do-you-really-know-the-fact-about-undrip.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a The Queen's secrets eh? - Debunk This https://rumble.com/v26r4qw-the-queens-secrets-eh-debunk-this.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a R. R. Smith Alberta Has A Sovereign Right.... A Factual Examination of The Constitutional Problem https://rumble.com/v26r9sk-r.-r.-smith-alberta-has-a-sovereign-right....-a-factual-examination-of-the-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a EXTREME PRIORITY - EVERYONE MUST GET THIS MESSAGE https://rumble.com/v2buvv0-extreme-priority-everone-must-get-this-message-out.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration https://rumble.com/v2c4dpg-how-to-create-a-lawful-republic-administration.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Share this Video to Open their Eyes to Facts! https://rumble.com/v2uz93g-alberta-fires-update-time-to-restore-law.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Laura Nina was live From UK with Dallas Hills https://rumble.com/v3mhl7r-laura-nina-was-live-constitutional-conventions.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Martens - with important information (Share) https://rumble.com/v4aky5u-darcy-martans-with-important-information-share.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Proof of Claim obligated to pay Property tax, income tax and other taxes https://rumble.com/v4arclw-proof-of-claim-obligated-to-pay-property-tax-income-tax-and-other-taxes.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Pissed off Grama needs your Attention https://rumble.com/v4bklpi-pissed-off-grama-needs-your-attention.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a FACTS vs FICTION KNOW WHO OWNS THE LAND - Not canada or their corrupt piece of toilet paper https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Educates Truth Feb. 2024 https://rumble.com/v4i7iwo-darcy-educates-truth-feb.-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Edson Town Hall Education of FACTS on How You Are Truly Governed ! https://rumble.com/v4n50dh-edson-town-hall-education-of-facts-on-how-you-are-truly-governed-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Create a nation within a hijacked land from Alberta or Canada Masquerading as a legit government https://rumble.com/v6kgt3m-create-a-nation-within-a-hijacked-land-from-alberta-or-canada-masquerading-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a DECLARATION OF ALBERTA SOVEREIGNTY -Become involved in your local constitutional committee meetings https://rumble.com/v6szpql-declaration-of-alberta-sovereignty-become-involved-in-your-local-constituti.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio this evening. The topic of discussion was the Statute of Westminster, 1931, and its implications on the land mass commonly referred to as "Canada." It was supposed to be a moderated debate, but we got blind sided a bit. First off, we appreciate that Marilyn took the time and accepted the invitation to the debate. Believe it or not, she is actually the first solicitor to have done so! Thank you, Marilyn. However, it quickly became obvious that Marilyn had an agenda - and that agenda was to attack, to discredit, and to smear. I had prepared my documents for a respectful debate and discussion of facts. I was not interested in a conversation that showed mostly disrespect and mockery while repeating legal opinions that have no standing in law. Sadly, Marilyn brought absolutely nothing of substance to the table. A few times, she diverted, distracted, and changed course abruptly - tactics that are used to confuse the audience so that the listener cannot follow along and forgets the actual topic of discussion. Clever! But I think quite a few people in the chat noticed that. Marilyn did not engage with highly important facts regarding sovereignty, land ownership, real constitutional documents such as the 1763 Letters Patent (not fake "constitutions" like the BNA Act) and the all-important definition of the Crown Office, the latter having been customary since the 16th century and backed up by numerous court cases (you'd think as a solicitor she'd know the court cases...). Instead, she kept repeating legal (legal = statutory, not based in law) opinions that are contradicted by the facts stated in the source documents. We wish her all the best with her referendum and her corporate, statutory (unlawful) plans to ensure that the People do not find out the truth. After all, in her capacity she must have sworn an Oath of Allegiance to none other than "His Majesty King Charles the Third, His heirs and successors" which in accordance with established legal doctrine, and confirmed in numerous court cases, is in fact none other than the Crown Office. :) Someone out there is starting to get scared of us and the facts that we have presented. Otherwise, they would not see the need to attack, mock and smear. Good! The best is yet to come! solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio

Special Announcement from UN Globalists Governance Today is Anniversary of UNDRIP 2021 Today 2025 UNDRIP has become the essential foundation of governance which has guaranteed the successful transition from liberty and self determination to enslavement! The slow gradually indoctrination has allowed you to abondon your freedom. We thank you for efforts. The removal of your Property Rights that ensured US the control over all the resources and established the starvation program that was essential for the depopulation program! All these were accomplished by you being complacent and distracted that ensured we on the UN Council would be the ruling class for generations to come! Propaganda ( I mean News) Good Evening my Slaves. We have some important information you MUST OBEY!!!!. We have some rogue individuals who are promoting freedom and liberty! We have had reports they are critical thinkers, highly intelligent sovereigns holding private meetings underground where our surveillance security systems are being compromised promoting these conspiracies! These are very dangerous ideologies and must be crushed if we want to maintain our current system of slavery? This is crucial to our very existence and we require your assistance in this Highly important MATTER. We will be offering a reward package for any information to help us in our unlawful capture of these individual who are promoting freedom and liberty!!! Reward packages as follows: Your slave rations of crickets and other assorted insects will be doubled. There will further rewards for anyone who wants to be employed in the (RAT Program) - You will be given more water rights per day - Reduced slave employment - 16 hours day will be reduced to 15 hours per day. - You will be entitled to one visit every month to enter the Globalists Sustainable park in your District from your restricted access to the parks of one visit every 3 months of 30 minutes. - Food and rations and many more privileges will be rewarded for being a part of the (RAT Program) ! We congratulate any and all slaves who have committed themselves to this endeavor to stop liberty! These Unalienable rights MUST not be tolerated. It is you that have committed to ensuring tyranny will survive! The survival of our UN Mandate of slavery is 100 percent enforced by your commitment to be enslaved! We are all doing are part to maintain this UNLAWFUL system! We Thank you for supporting our UN Agenda without you none of this could happen! Thank you With your commitment we will ensure 2026 UNDRIP will be as successful as we move to our Sustainable UNDRIP plan of 2030. Things are all falling right in plan with our goals of mass Genocide! We at the UN Council had a Plan, we were Committed, organized and you were all disorganized !

Creating a Natural Law Republic & Parts 1 -10 https://rumble.com/vsedh2-creating-a-natural-law-republic.html Where We Are & Where We're Going Part 1 https://rumble.com/vtalsq-where-we-are-and-where-were-going-part-1.html Imagining A Better Future Part 2 https://rumble.com/vtadh0-imagining-a-better-future-part-2.html Exposing Fatal Flaws of Government & Top-Down Societal Control Part 3 https://rumble.com/vtavnq-exposing-fatal-flaws-of-government-and-top-down-societal-control-part-3.html The Death of Government & Rise of the Natural Law Society Part 4 https://rumble.com/vtb0ky-the-death-of-government-and-rise-of-the-natural-law-society-part-4.html How A Public Service Admin Works in A Natural Law Republic Part 5 https://rumble.com/vtbxga-how-a-public-service-admin-works-in-a-natural-law-republic-part-5.html Creating A Social Contract With Real Protection Part 6 https://rumble.com/vtc84q-creating-a-social-contract-with-real-protection-part-6.html Crime, Reparation, & Reform in a Natural Law Justice System Part 7 https://rumble.com/vtddya-crime-reparation-and-reform-in-a-natural-law-justice-system-part-7.html Keeping Corporations in Check! Part 8 https://rumble.com/vtejxe-keeping-corporations-in-check-part-8.html Reclaiming Media & Restoring Truth in Society Part 9 https://rumble.com/vticn2-reclaiming-media-and-restoring-truth-in-society-part-9.html Creating a New Education System Part 10 https://rumble.com/vtn372-creating-a-new-education-system-part-10.html Welcome http://constitutionalconventions.ca Telegram group. Please connect with us. https://t.me/constitutionalconventions You may email [email protected] Zoom 5 - 10 Eastern Time, Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985

Great news our message sent out to find this Amazing Man - We had had him finish his Speach that DRUTHERS Silenced!!!! - Please share the Facts Putus Chief Speech that DRUTHERS tried To SILENCE! is here to view in the video at the end of his and our conversation. Now here is a Soluion we are doing to end the LIE of canada Creating a Natural Law Republic & Parts 1 -10 https://rumble.com/vsedh2-creating-a-natural-law-republic.html Where We Are & Where We're Going Part 1 https://rumble.com/vtalsq-where-we-are-and-where-were-going-part-1.html Imagining A Better Future Part 2 https://rumble.com/vtadh0-imagining-a-better-future-part-2.html Exposing Fatal Flaws of Government & Top-Down Societal Control Part 3 https://rumble.com/vtavnq-exposing-fatal-flaws-of-government-and-top-down-societal-control-part-3.html The Death of Government & Rise of the Natural Law Society Part 4 https://rumble.com/vtb0ky-the-death-of-government-and-rise-of-the-natural-law-society-part-4.html How A Public Service Admin Works in A Natural Law Republic Part 5 https://rumble.com/vtbxga-how-a-public-service-admin-works-in-a-natural-law-republic-part-5.html Creating A Social Contract With Real Protection Part 6 https://rumble.com/vtc84q-creating-a-social-contract-with-real-protection-part-6.html Crime, Reparation, & Reform in a Natural Law Justice System Part 7 https://rumble.com/vtddya-crime-reparation-and-reform-in-a-natural-law-justice-system-part-7.html Keeping Corporations in Check! Part 8 https://rumble.com/vtejxe-keeping-corporations-in-check-part-8.html Reclaiming Media & Restoring Truth in Society Part 9 https://rumble.com/vticn2-reclaiming-media-and-restoring-truth-in-society-part-9.html Creating a New Education System Part 10 https://rumble.com/vtn372-creating-a-new-education-system-part-10.html Welcome http://constitutionalconventions.ca Telegram group. Please connect with us. https://t.me/constitutionalconventions You may email [email protected] Zoom 5 - 10 Eastern Time, Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985

This 2009 entertaining documentary film explores the history of banking, the selling out of the prosperity of Canada, the clearance sale of Canadian businesses and the political liquidation of public infrastructures to the multi-national corporate oligarchy. How has this led to the biggest economic crash / recession / depression in Canadian history? Could it have something to do with our politicians listening to international bankers and corporations instead of the people Canada? How does the Canadian banking system really work? How does the central Bank of Canada compare with the American Federal Reserve? This movie presents these issues that affect every Canadian from the perspective of and delivered by concerned youth in a astute and colourful manner. This is a serious journalism piece that asks the tough questions directly to such politicians as Former Prime Minister of Canada Paul Martin, Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, Ontario Gas Man Dan McTeague, NDP Leader Jack Layton, Mayor of Oshawa John Gray, Former Prime Minister of Canada John Turner and many more! MONEY 1. Amount of money in circulation 2. 91% Federal Debt is interest 3. How money is created 4. Legislation 5. How much we spend on debt 6. Every country is in debt 7. German company printing bank notes 8. Pension companies losing money TRANSPARENCY 1. Power Corp 2. Bilderberg 3. Michael Ignatieff Bank Of Canada BOC Finance Minister Jim Flaherty Stephen Harper Mark Carney Sovereirgnty Monetary Money Depression Recession Policy Freedom Rights Ontario Globalism Federal Court Economy Economics Crisis News IMF World Federal Reserve Ron Paul Coinage Currency Country Silver Gold https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3p85joc1Dw Contact Jake Jackson at [email protected] https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/ Please subscribe to Jakes Channel on youtube and share the video to family and friends. Thank You https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity Creating a Natural Law Republic & Parts 1 -10 https://rumble.com/vsedh2-creating-a-natural-law-republic.html Where We Are & Where We're Going Part 1 https://rumble.com/vtalsq-where-we-are-and-where-were-going-part-1.html Imagining A Better Future Part 2 https://rumble.com/vtadh0-imagining-a-better-future-part-2.html Exposing Fatal Flaws of Government & Top-Down Societal Control Part 3 https://rumble.com/vtavnq-exposing-fatal-flaws-of-government-and-top-down-societal-control-part-3.html The Death of Government & Rise of the Natural Law Society Part 4 https://rumble.com/vtb0ky-the-death-of-government-and-rise-of-the-natural-law-society-part-4.html How A Public Service Admin Works in A Natural Law Republic Part 5 https://rumble.com/vtbxga-how-a-public-service-admin-works-in-a-natural-law-republic-part-5.html Creating A Social Contract With Real Protection Part 6 https://rumble.com/vtc84q-creating-a-social-contract-with-real-protection-part-6.html Crime, Reparation, & Reform in a Natural Law Justice System Part 7 https://rumble.com/vtddya-crime-reparation-and-reform-in-a-natural-law-justice-system-part-7.html Keeping Corporations in Check! Part 8 https://rumble.com/vtejxe-keeping-corporations-in-check-part-8.html Reclaiming Media & Restoring Truth in Society Part 9 https://rumble.com/vticn2-reclaiming-media-and-restoring-truth-in-society-part-9.html Creating a New Education System Part 10 https://rumble.com/vtn372-creating-a-new-education-system-part-10.html Welcome http://constitutionalconventions.ca Telegram group. Please connect with us. https://t.me/constitutionalconventions You may email [email protected] Zoom 5 - 10 Eastern Time, Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985

PROJECT LIBERTY Self - Sufficient Communities - Restoring Law and Accountability at the Local level- https://rumble.com/v2i8jb0-project-liberty-self-sufficient-communities-restoring-law-and-accountabilit.html You may email [email protected] We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity

DEFUND CANADA and WE ALL WIN except the Predators PROJECT LIBERTY Self - Sufficient Communities - Restoring Law and Accountability at the Local level- You may email [email protected] We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity

DEFUND CANADA and WE ALL WIN except the Predators PROJECT LIBERTY Self - Sufficient Communities - Restoring Law and Accountability at the Local level- You may email [email protected] We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity

DEFUND CANADA and WE ALL WIN except the Predators PROJECT LIBERTY Self - Sufficient Communities - Restoring Law and Accountability at the Local level- You may email [email protected] We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity

We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ [email protected] Credit to video to John https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9G0Ie6gq6A http://eternallyaware.com/index.html SHARE to end this shit show thank you https://rumble.com/v2vcrf0-june-20-2023.html Share to educate more men and women. Here is a collection of Important Information to Actually End the Tyranny! We have added both Youtube and Rumble channels. as many of you know Youtube deletes facts!!! Alberta Fires Update -Time to Restore law https://rumble.com/v2uz93g-alberta-fires-update-time-to-restore-law.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO2sfzmRZps Christine Ireland This is the year we are Not Escaping this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwnNqXImiUE https://rumble.com/v2end2u-christine-ireland-this-is-the-year-we-are-not-escaping-this.html Is This The Most Important Video in The World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3a1qb4HICYA https://rumble.com/v2erwlq-is-this-the-most-important-video-in-the-world.html Adrien Thomas & Dallas Hills discuss UNDRIP, First Nations, Indian Act https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jEaOLiA4ao https://rumble.com/v2cfpr6-adrien-thomas-and-dallas-hills-discuss-undrip-first-nations-indian-act.html Serena Bear, & Dallas Hills discuss You are the government https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0UwsPxuh0c https://rumble.com/v2bmq2c-serena-bear-and-dallas-hills-what-is-our-next-step.html Introduction To Constitutional Conventions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVsWP4i1_IQ https://rumble.com/vwdzo0-introduction-to-constitutional-conventions.html Ian Cameron Freedom Network @ Dallas Hills Self Sufficient Not Sustainable Death!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ze0d8TrQGRc https://rumble.com/v2fy830-ian-cameron-freedom-network-dallas-hills-self-sufficient-not-sustainable-de.html Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upBRrhtFMM https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Back To the Future - with Dallas Hills https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ7BpxPZZEc https://rumble.com/vqjsry-back-to-the-future-stop-repeating-history.html J WILTON LITTLECHILD V ALBERTA Citizens of WETASKIWIN COURT CASE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxe23uBASus https://rumble.com/v10ca0r-the-naked-truth-beneath-the-black-robe.html The Canadian Deception https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ib6TAybKw0 https://rumble.com/vprp8e-the-canadian-deception.html Time to End the Globalist System with FACTS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8N6xNP-Zz0 https://rumble.com/v12q9ij-time-to-end-the-globaists-system-with-facts.html Canadian Bill of Rights , Charter of Rights & Notwithstanding Clause https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEz4VAeq-0 https://rumble.com/v28ot7w-canadian-bill-of-rights-charter-of-rights-and-notwithstanding-clause.html Kim Carlson the Government is Not your Government ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxF9iNqjErw https://rumble.com/v2enbn4-kim-carlson-the-government-is-not-your-government-.html Every Canadian Must See- Comments have more info - Stan McDonald and Richard Vobes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlD3S7QI28E https://rumble.com/v2uu5e6-every-canadian-must-see-comments-have-more-info-stan-mcdonald-and-richard-v.html Dr 'Daniel Nagase' Why hasn't Justin Trudeau Been Arrested YET! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzlrvfr9YfI https://rumble.com/v2il2sm-dr-daniel-nagase-why-hasnt-justin-trudeau-been-arrested-yet.html CANADA IS A 150 YEAR OLD LIE (SHARE) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZuvRQkyHnM https://rumble.com/v2um8si-canada-is-a-150-year-old-lie-share.html Magna Carta: The Ugly Truth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMrIuMu6Itw https://rumble.com/vqj8xs-december-10-2021.html Rima Laibow, MD , Jake Jackson @ Dallas Hills discuss Solutions and Unity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jB3m8Gtihc https://rumble.com/v2fwrt2-rima-laibow-md-jake-jackson-dallas-hills-discuss-solutions-and-unity.html We have an opportunity to use the viewers of this show to bring more together. Point them to Constitutional Conventions site to research more information. Once more are educated how we are truly enslaved under the Corporation of Canada the faster we may be able to end this Tyranny! Thank you Please contact us if you would like us to email and help promote an event. We also are asking if organizers would like their emails added so they may be connected in their local areas. Its our time now as millions are pushing back and have become more educated!

Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80C it is a zero

Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT80C Do You KNOW Canada IS NOT A COUNTRY? Canada DOES NOT HAVE A CONSTITUTION? Learn More https://constitutionalconventions.ca/

Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93RNdZSRj4

Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT80C Our consent to be governed in Canada was derived through deliberate deception and fraud. The Enacting Clause of the Constitution Act 1867 was repealed in 1893, section 2 of the Constitution Act extending Queen Victoria's executive government and authority of and over Canada was also repealed in 1893 by the Statute Law Revision Act (UK). These are facts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ifJllDFl9k

Greetings Everyone Short announcement https://rumble.com/v45kmax-greetings-everyone-special-announcement-ending-the-fraud.html#comment-337380489 We at Constitutional Conventions have always been about fact and Solution based. We also have maintained the best information to create an accountable system to restore LAW Restoring LAW! --- Law is Land - Air - Water Now with more comprehending our Message for year has now inspired many more to dig deeper into the private membership contracts and realize it’s all a FRAUD! We have been connecting with many groups to work on solutions and this is now moving in an amazing direction forward The tables are turning and we the people are the TOP and their system is the Bottom! We are Promoting the P.O.G.G The POGG is about the public/private partnership (FRAUD) agreement your Mayor signed & replacing it with a better one. :) We want to stay focused on the fact that UN Agenda21 removed the "public" from Canada & we are S.O.L. without it restored... from the bottom up.... be it temporarily since it's all just a sinister, slavery cyst-em. THE POGG --- is about IMMEDIATELY restoring our/a public trustee/guardian AND to REMOVE our public/private "ass/ets" from the legal & central banking cyst-em. Therefore, in my humble opinion, discussions on common law, Magna Carta, charter, bill of rights, equity, Legalize or etymology etc. is all distractions right now. We need ZERO distractions right now and 100 Percent focus on STOPING the FRAUD! POGG: Pulling the Phases together: We need 1. a simple lawful affirmation. This is ready but i would LOVE input from your crew as to what they think should be included.... ie., a basic trustee oath = no crown, no province, no human persons (i am shocked that Jane Scharf doesn't see those 2 GLARING weasel words right at the start of the Bill of 'Rites') :) 2. a simple local constitution - - this is a basic contract between a public/POGG guardian & the local settlers/beneficiaries. The constitution is backed by law, not words. A constitution is just an agreement = a contract = a covenant = of your "public" instrument that is to be sworn on, no? Why do people swear on the King James Bible when they haven't even read it? Or could possibly uphold it? And the constitution/contract will define (the parameters of) your Mayor. The UN declared him an "international Agent"... we can 'redefine' him as a 'peace officer in law', head of justice... Who says we can't? Lawyers??? Really what have they actually done for us ... but i digress 3. A database of all sitting mayors, councillors, AND CAOs, Clerks & Solicitors (CITY officers are added in the next phase - those positions need to be PUBLIC too) 4. the database of the local wo/men who will serve/stand for their geographical area to see this re-public through. We can have the POGG structures in place for every Mayor/mentor to move to, but 'town folk' must direct it, it will be their designated public guardian. AND.... you don't want the restoration of your government done by anyone from "outside" that will give it up or screw it up. 5. Any and all the names of all candidates that ran in 2022 for mayor, councilor, school board, even MP, MPP. Anyone that lost in an election.... they will be interested in the PPP solution. 6. the names of folks ready to set up town hall meetings to collect & educate the "public". We will have a POGG educational package ready ("Let's Make a Mayor!") that explains the PPP fraud & "who's Waldo?" as simple as possible.... BOTTOM LINE: everyone can now decide WHAT they thought they were 'electing".... Door #1 = Public Mayor/local guardian/trustee (full control & minimal taxes used for local issues ONLY) Door #2 = Private CITY/Strong Mayor (provincial PPP full control, SDGs & MAX. TAX, some are facing 14% increase in property tax) Door #3 - International Global Mayor (UN/WEF etc. control and they want you eating crickets or dead....or both... and your kids) 7. and finally, the petition & sheets ready for the town hall public forums &/or taken door to door. This is NOT a pleading petition like Leslyn Lewis' federal/legal one. This is an instrument that is used to "recapture the public" that has been hijacked AND BEING DEFRAUDED. If our public guardians have been captured & involved in a coup d'état, we have a DUTY (both as men & women) to protect our public ass/ets. And to pull them out....and to do no harm... Thank you for all your hard work & perseverance, This is pulling together amazingly! So many brilliant men and women! We are working on short video clips #1-3 visual... it's a spoof on "Let's Make a Deal!". FUN! Many blessings, Please share the POGG Please connect to the websites below Help those who are lost and confused to join in and ending this corruption, the more crap they post the longer the pain will be inflicted, Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. We have a Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Download POGG - https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/ -CASH REWARD- $5,000.00 for proof that the 'Office of the Mayor' is owned by the Province & not the people. Ending the PPP Fraud The Documentation is near finalization and we all look forward to ENDNING the FRAUD!!!!

Political activist Mel Hurtig is the author of "The Truth about Canada." In this 2008 interview with TVO's Allan Gregg, he says that Canada is not the country it was 20 years ago, and using statistics, reveals how we measure up globally in all areas of our lives Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.We have the opportunity to MOVE in the direction if we all start to really use every platform with the solution share video forward email - lets in this FRAUD! Its your choice! Educate others who waste valuable time and their lives to STOP helping the UN AGENDA by posting memes , Trudeau must , go , Doctor vs Doctor, Convoys. These are all distractions to keep millions going NO WHERE!!! As you watch social media do you NOT see most of these accounts are fake to keep the useless distractions going on and on. Learn What Canada Really is !! https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Contact [email protected] https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/ Contact Shelagh [email protected] Documents for Creston Deputation: https://www.theawarenessproject.ca/ Contact Neil from the website If we Truley want to end this FRAUD, we must coordinate posting the solution! STOP liking their distractions, send them a message to stop wasting time on CRAP! Help those who are lost and confused to join in and ending this corruption, the more crap they post the longer the pain will be inflicted , and murder,,, Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Download POGG - https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/ -CASH REWARD- $5,000.00 for proof that the 'Office of the Mayor' is owned by the Province & not the people. Ending the PPP Fraud The Documentation is near finalization and we all look forward to ENDNING the FRAUD!!!! "The POGG Primer: Ending the PPP Fraud" revealed gross negligence & corruption done in every CITY HALL by the signatures of de facto Global (Strong) Mayors & CITY CAOs. "Defrauding the public" is a serious charge & one we don't ignore. This fraud can & will be corrected with a new oath/"contract" being drafted now. This is a re-publicing of assets & IMMEDIATE relief from the tyranny of the present financial system. That is valuable information to your Family and Friends. WE will have updates very soon and much more to release in the coming days. 2024 will be the end of the fraud when more have the information. So if your serious about ending hte FRAUD - you must take the information and share the information and become the leader /mentor/ organizer to ensure your community ends this FRAUD! All the best in the New Year to everyone Changing the System from the Bottom Up - 3 Part Series (Part 3) We have the opportunity to MOVE in the direction if we all start to really use every platform with the solution Its your choice! Educate others who Educate others who waste valuable time and their lives to STOP helping the UN AGENDA by posting memes , Trudeau must , go , Doctor vs Doctor, Convoys. These are all distractions to keep millions going NO WHERE!!! As you watch social media do you NOT see most of these accounts are fake to keep the useless distractions going on and on. If we Truley want to end this FRAUD, we must coordinate posting the solution! STOP liking their distractions, send them a message to stop wasting time on CRAP! Help those who are lost and confused to join in and ending this corruption, the more crap they post the longer the pain will be inflicted , and murder,,, Please start to educate the solution,, things to think about -- Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Download POGG - https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/

Mel Hurtig's 'The Truth About Canada Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.We have the opportunity to MOVE in the direction if we all start to really use every platform with the solution share video forward email - lets in this FRAUD! Its your choice! Educate others who waste valuable time and their lives to STOP helping the UN AGENDA by posting memes , Trudeau must , go , Doctor vs Doctor, Convoys. These are all distractions to keep millions going NO WHERE!!! As you watch social media do you NOT see most of these accounts are fake to keep the useless distractions going on and on. Learn What Canada Really is !! https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Contact [email protected] https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/ Contact Shelagh [email protected] Documents for Creston Deputation: https://www.theawarenessproject.ca/ Contact Neil from the website If we Truley want to end this FRAUD, we must coordinate posting the solution! STOP liking their distractions, send them a message to stop wasting time on CRAP! Help those who are lost and confused to join in and ending this corruption, the more crap they post the longer the pain will be inflicted , and murder,,, Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Download POGG - https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/ -CASH REWARD- $5,000.00 for proof that the 'Office of the Mayor' is owned by the Province & not the people. Ending the PPP Fraud The Documentation is near finalization and we all look forward to ENDNING the FRAUD!!!! "The POGG Primer: Ending the PPP Fraud" revealed gross negligence & corruption done in every CITY HALL by the signatures of de facto Global (Strong) Mayors & CITY CAOs. "Defrauding the public" is a serious charge & one we don't ignore. This fraud can & will be corrected with a new oath/"contract" being drafted now. This is a re-publicing of assets & IMMEDIATE relief from the tyranny of the present financial system. That is valuable information to your Family and Friends. WE will have updates very soon and much more to release in the coming days. 2024 will be the end of the fraud when more have the information. So if your serious about ending hte FRAUD - you must take the information and share the information and become the leader /mentor/ organizer to ensure your community ends this FRAUD! All the best in the New Year to everyone Changing the System from the Bottom Up - 3 Part Series (Part 3) We have the opportunity to MOVE in the direction if we all start to really use every platform with the solution Its your choice! Educate others who Educate others who waste valuable time and their lives to STOP helping the UN AGENDA by posting memes , Trudeau must , go , Doctor vs Doctor, Convoys. These are all distractions to keep millions going NO WHERE!!! As you watch social media do you NOT see most of these accounts are fake to keep the useless distractions going on and on. If we Truley want to end this FRAUD, we must coordinate posting the solution! STOP liking their distractions, send them a message to stop wasting time on CRAP! Help those who are lost and confused to join in and ending this corruption, the more crap they post the longer the pain will be inflicted , and murder,,, Please start to educate the solution,, things to think about -- Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Download POGG - https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/

RUSSELL ROGERS SMITH The man of Canadian history that no one knows about (and the political elite would prefer to keep it that way). The following are writings of Russell Rogers Smith: Alberta Has The Sovereign Right To Issue And Use Its Own Credit. From 1937. Inside Canada. From 1939. Ho Canada. From 1965. George Barr, King’s Council, in Ottawa with a stenographer was dispatched by Prime Minister William Lyon MacKenzie King to Montreal to depose Russell Rogers-Smith in 1946. The following is the transcript that we will call, The Interview. On September 21st, 1954, one George A. Morison of North Vancouver, BC, wrote a letter to The Chairman of The Royal Commission of Inquiry with an excerpt from a manuscript entitled, The Sword of Damocles which was written by Russell Rogers Smith. Read it all here. ALBERTAHASTHE SOVEREIGN RIGHTTOISSUE AND USEITS OWN CREDIT A Factual Examination ofthe Constitutional ProblembyR. ROGERS SMITH OTTAWA1937 NOTE The information contained in this booklet was placed before Premier Aberhartand members of his Cabinet by R. Rogers Smith at the Macdonald Hotel,in Edmonton, on October 25th 1935. FORWORD Although the information in this booklet is important to all Provinces and all Canadians, it is vital to the people of Alberta, particularly the elected members, because Albertaelected representatives committed to introduce a Social Credit regime. Throughout the country Canadians are intently watching Alberta — “Why do theystall ?” “Why do they not put Social Credit into effect ?” They talked enough about it. Isit that they do not know about the relationship of Alberta to the Dominion ?” These arequestions being asked today. By checking the information in this brochure it can be proved that Alberta has theSovereign right to issue and use its own credit. If, however, the members do not dothis, they can be justly accused by their electors of incompetence or worse. The facts aretaken from the Statutes at large, from the Archives, and from original historical sourceswhich are irrefutable. I desire to express my gratitude to the various constitutional authorities who have assisted me in the checking and verifying the facts contained herein. R. R. S. From 1937 until 2007, seventy years have elapsed before this pamphlet was digitized, and more years are bound to pass ; the only explanation for this lack of consideration towards the information therein offered and the appropriate response stemsmostly from the teachings of our historians and the media organisations. What isbroadcasted about agreements to be reached between provincials rests mostly on languages, when a Federal Union calls upon territorial owners, not languages. Those who argue about the two founding Canadian nations are quite sincere, but aFederal Union is a contract between Sovereign States. And a Sovereign State is a territory owned by its citizens sole responsible for its administration and destiny. J-P Rhéaume, [email protected] Eminent Domain is : “The unrestricted ownership of land ; independent of all action from without and paramount over all action within”. “The right to exercise the power of Eminent Domain is inherent inSovereignty, necessary to it and inseparable from it. From the very nature of society and of organized government, this right must belong tothe State. It is a part of the Sovereign power of any nation. It exists independent of constitutional recognition, and it existed prior to constitutions. It lies dormant in the State until legislative action is had pointingout the occasion, and modes and the agencies for its exercise. (James Cacroft, Encyclopaedia of American and British Law)”. I — THE ATTEMPT TO FEDERATE THE COLONIES OF BRITISH NORTH AMERICA. The reason the request of the Colonies to be permitted to form a Federal Union wasrefused by the Colonial Office in 1867 was because the United States were pressing GreatBritain for a settlement of the claims for indemnity arising out of the actions of the British Navy during the Civil War, for which Great Britain acknowledged responsibility inthe Treaty of Washington. The terms of this Treaty could only be settled by retainingCanada as a Colony. Great Britain had not only assisted the Confederacy from 1861 to 1865, but hadjoined in a conspiracy with France, Spain and Austria to divide North America betweenthem. On October 31st, 1861 a convention was held in London attended by delegates fromEngland, France and Spain ; they agreed to a joint intervention in Mexican affairs. Emperor Maximilian, brother of Franz Joseph of Austria, was to be placed on the throne ofMexico, Louisiana, which extended at the time from the Gulf of Mexico to the Canadianborder, was to be returned to France. The Northern States were to be defeated and returned to England as Colonies. The Confederacy was to be free and retain their slaves. Great Britain floated the bonds of the Confederacy ; the proceeds were used to buildthe Alabama, Florida, Georgia, the Shenandoah, fast sailing ships and their auxiliaries. These were built in Great Britain and the headquarters of the CF Navy was in Liverpool,as all the CF ports were blockaded. They swank $15,000,000 worth of United Statesshipping without taking a prize into an Admiralty court, and without firing a shot at anarmed enemy. Great Britain also spent $5,000,000 on her own navy, and at the time of the Trent affair embarked 8000 troops for Canada to attack Lincoln from Toronto. The Spanish fleet, at the time in Cuban waters, arrived to invest Vera Cruz Dec. 14th ,1861. The British and French fleets arriving Jan. 6th and 7th of 1862. France supplied30,000 troops for this campaign. The Czar of Russia takes a Hand Still smarting from the Crimean War 1854-1856, the Czar, to disrupt the scheme ofthe European Allies, sent his powerful Baltic squadron to New York harbour and his Pacific squadron to San Francisco. His action had the desired effect. Great Britain and Spainwithdrew their fleets from Vera Cruz leaving the burden of supporting the EmperorMaximilian entirely to France. He was eventually taken prisoner and with two of hisGenerals, court-martialled and shot. When Lincoln won the Civil War, France was informed in plain terms “that theUnited States would not tolerate a French force or the existence of any foreign Monarchyin Mexico”. On Jan. 14th, 1866, Napoleon ordered his General in Mexico to withdraw thetroops. Speech in Ottawa at Session of 1865 by theHon. John A. Macdonald on terms of Treaty of Washington In a four and a half hour speech in Ottawa the Hon. John A. Macdonald told theHouse that he was notified by a statesman in the United States that if satisfactory termscould not be agreed upon it meant war between the United States and Great Britain. Inthat event naturally Canada would be invaded. During these eventful and hectic times our delegates arranged to leave Canada July30th, 1866, to take the Quebec Resolution to London ; these Resolutions, which were fora Federal Union, were to be returned to the people for their ratification (see Section 70). We were to have a government of the Canadian people. Tilly, Tupper, Archibald, and the Maritime delegates left as arranged, Tilly to bechairman. The Hon. JAM wrote him on the eve of his departure ; “… On no account change any of the provisions of the Resolutions for if you do itmay mean an entire re-opening of the negotiations with the Provinces and the consequent disruption of our plans…”. The Hon. John wrote the letter because he was unavoidably detained. Armed partiesof men from the United States had invaded Ontario; citizens were enlisted to repel theraids. They were not driven out, however, until $8,000,000 of damage was done to theProvince of Ontario. The United States were pressing for a settlement of the claims against Great Britain,and an unofficial agreement had been reached on the terms of the Treaty of Washington,before the Hon john could leave Canada, which he did the latter part of November. Ourdelegates in London had been unsuccessful in their attempt to bring the Quebec Resolutions to the attention of Parliament, and were cooling their heels in London waiting forhim. On arrival he immediately convened the delegates in the Westminster Palace HotelDec. 4th, 1866, where they sat until Dec. 24th drafting the “Kingdom of Canada” draft ofthe Bill. Each delegate signed a separate copy ; these are carefully preserved in the Archives in Ottawa. A draft was sent to Lord Carnarvon, Secy. of State for the Colonies by the Hon. John,Dec. 26th, 1866 and he had a reply dated the 28th, stating that the draft was being sent tothe printers to be printed. This draft of the Bill which contains the following repealingclause was rejected by the Colonial Office : “From and after the Union, all Acts and parts of Acts, passed by the Parliament ofGreat Britain, the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, thelegislature of Upper Canada, the legislature of Lower Canada, the legislature of NovaScotia or the legislature of New Brunswick which are repugnant to or insistent withthe Provisions of this Act shall be and the same are hereby repealed”. It is not difficult to understand why the Colonial Office, objected to Canada’s requestfor self-government. It would have been a suicidal policy on the part of Great Britain togrant the Provinces of Canada the right to create a Federal Union. It was imperative forthe best interest of Great Britain that Canada be retained a Colony, so that they couldsettle the terms they had tentatively agreed to in the Treaty of Washington. In a pamphlet entitled the Balance Sheet of the Washington Treaty, 1871, a copy ofwhich is in the Parliamentary Library at Ottawa, Viscount Bury, the author and a memberof the Imperial Parliament, frankly tells us that the interest of Canada were sacrificed tomake peace between England and the United States ; England agreed to : 1. Pay ₤3,500,000 in settlement of the claims for shipping sunk (the Alabama Claims). 2. National Expression of regret (an apology). 3. Canadian loan ₤2,500.000. 4. Settle claims arising out of the War. 5. To cession of territorial rights in perpetuity. 6. To cession in perpetuity of joint navigation of the St. Lawrence. 7. To cession of indemnity for “Fenian raids” $8,000,000. 8. To equal rights with British subjects of fishing rights in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. An arbitration board was set up and final payment made by Great Britain at Genevaby payment of ₤3,229,000, in 1872. The United States allowed certain sums for the disputed boundaries, which shouldhave been credited or paid by Great Britain to Canada as well as the indemnity for the“Fenian Raids” $8,000,000 which is still owing to the Province of Ontario. Had the Colonial Office granted our request for a Federal Union, the Imperial Parliment would have had nothing to barter with in their settlement with the United States ; aswell as the possibility that after creating a Federal Union, Canada would join the UnitedStates, which at the time was considered an enemy. The status of Canada has since been changed by an Act of the Imperial Parliament,the Statute of Westminster, Dec. 11th, 1931, Section 11 of the Act states that Canada is nolonger to be considered as a “Colony”, and recognizes Canada as an equal with GreatBritain as a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations. II — HOW DID WE GET THE B.N.A. ACT, 1867 ? In a communication dated Dec. 28th, 1866, Lord Carnarvon acknowledged receipt ofthe draft of the “Bill” submitted by the Hon. John A. Macdonald, Chairman of the Canadian delegates ; and told him that he was sending the draft to the printers to be printed. This was done, as we have in the Archives at Ottawa printed copies of this draft. Eachdelegate from Canada signed his own copy. The British North America Act passed the second reading of the House of Commons, without being printed — (See Parliamentary Debates February 26th, 1867) Between Dec. 28th and Feb. 9th following, we are informed by Sir Frederic Rogers,Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies :— “They held many meetings at which I wasalways present : Lord Carnarvon was in the chair, and I was rather disappointed in hispower of presidency. I had always believed — and the belief has so consolidated itselfthat I can hardly realize the possibility of anyone thinking the contrary — that the destinyof our Colonies is independence, and that in this view the functions of the Colonial Officeis, to secure that our connection, while it lasts, shall be profitable to both parties and our separation, when it comes, as amicable as possible. This opinion is founded, first, on thegeneral principle that a spirited Nation — and a Colony becomes a Nation — will notsubmit to be governed in its internal affairs by a distant government, and that nations geographically remote have no such common interest that will bind them permanently together in foreign policy, with all its details and mutations”. The minutes of the meetings at which the British North America Act was drafted have never been made public. Referring to Hansard we find that the “Bill” was introduced by Lord Carnarvon to the House of Lords February 9th, 1867, in the following words :— “The Bill opens by reciting the desire of the several provinces to be FederallyUnited”. The actual words of the Preamble are :— “By reason of the request of the Colonies for Federal Government. It is expedient therefore that they have Laws and Regulations to guide them”. Lord Campbell, leader of the opposition in the House of Lords, in opening his speechat the second reading of the “Bill” February 26th, 1867 said : “The ‘Bill’ is founded I believe on what is termed the Quebec scheme of 1864 —Our lights, indeed may be imperfect about this part of the subject, and I will not dwellupon it — but one thing is clear the preamble of the Resolution comes before us inclear and perfect authenticity”. There is no reason to doubt that the House of Lords believed they were enacting a measure that would permit the Provinces to form a Federal Union. The page which sets forth the enunciation of the motives for which the measure wasenacted is not a part of the printed copies of the Act received in Canada. Instead of thiswe have a substitution — “Whereas the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have expressed their desire to be Federally United into one Dominion”. Thisis not a true statement and is discussed under the heading “What is the B.N.A. Act ?” Let us now hear what the Privy Council has to say :— Lord Watson (Chairman of the Privy Council Maritime Bank case (1892) A.C. 441) recognizes the object or raison d’être of the measure, as stated in the preamble, as most important :— “The object of the Act was… to create a Federal Union… entrusted with the exclusive administration of affairs in which they had a common interest, eachProvince retaining its independence and autonomy”. The object of the Act supersedes in importance any subsequent section. Why was thepage which contains this deleted from the printed copies circulated in Canada ? It was totwist the measure so that Canada should be retained as a Colony. “British North America” Bill Enacted, 1867 After passing the House of Lords, it was taken to the Commons, Feb. 26th, 1867. Thedebate there centered around the appropriation of the Intercolonial Railway. The purposeof the Act was not discussed. It evidently was assumed that this had been debated in theLords. One member asked the Government “Why all the haste in enacting the measure ? Iam not sure I will have anything against it, but it affects four million people, and weshould have an opportunity to study the measure, which is now in second reading, and ithas not been printed”. After passing the Commons it received the assent of Queen Victoria March 29th, 1867, to be effective in Canada July 1st, 1867. Strenuous opposition was expressed by Nova Scotia. A protest against the Act wassigned by 30,000 people, and in the election of May, Dr. Tupper’s government was defeated. In a house of 38 members, Stewart Campbell of Guysboro County and Dr. Tupperwere the only two returned. Tupper resigned. Joseph Howe and eight members weredelegated to place a petition before the Imperial Parliament “That Nova Scotia be relieved of this measure or a Royal Commission of inquiry be appointed”. Dr. Tupper, a life-long political enemy of Howe, followed him to London, and going to his hotel said“Nothing that I can say will deter you from placing your petition before Parliament, butthey will not grant your request. When they refuse, come back to Canada and take aCabinet seat at Ottawa, and we will do the best we can with what we got”. [For Tupper tosuggest such a move, he must have had some inside dope.] Howe was dumbfounded, for he previously had thought that Tupper, who was one ofthe delegates to London dealing with the Quebec Resolutions, was partly responsible forthe drafting of the British North America Act. He induced John Bright to place the petition before Parliament. It was as Dr. Tupper predicted, defeated, the vote being 183 to 87. Nova Scotia was compelled against her wish to become a member of the Dominion. In a speech on leaving London, Howe said :— “We go home to share the perils of our native Land, in whose service we consider itan honour to labour and whose fortunes in this darkest hour of her history it would becowardice to desert”. III — WHAT IS THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT ? The British North America Act is not, and has never been, legal and valid as the Constitution of Canada. Canada has no Constitution. The “Act” is a “Private Bill” conceived and drafted by the Colonial Office and enacted into a Statute by the Imperial Parliament, uniting four colonies of North Americainto One Colony. Last year (1936) the Imperial Parliament enacted a “Bill” amending the Constitutionof the island of Malta, a Colony in the Mediterranean. Students of law recognize this Actas a “Private Bill” in relation to the Empire, as it only affected Malta. The British NorthAmerica Act is placed in the same category as it affected only Canada. A private Billmust always have a preamble, the recitals of which must be proved. This is a substantiveenunciation of the motives which impelled the Parliament to enact the Statute. It is themost important part of the Act, superseding in importance any of the subsequent sections.The Act must be read and construed as a whole although one section may bear a wider and another a more limited meaning. The Governor General is the Government, with the power to appoint a Council to“aid and advise” him, or he can remove them from office at his discretion. The custody ofthe Great Seal is granted to him, the power to appoint Judges, Justices of the Peace,Commissioners, Deputies of himself, Lieut. Governors of the Provinces, and Members ofthe Senate. He can remove any person from office exercising any official power in ourDominion, including the Premier of Canada, and the Speaker of the Senate. Insofar as the Provinces are concerned he takes the place of “the Queen and a Secretary of State”. In other words, any legislation of the Legislatures of the Provinces can be“disallowed” by him ; further, the Provinces can not refer any legislation so disallowed tothe Imperial Parliament, or the Crown. There Was No Confederation There is nothing in the historical record which can be cited to support the story ofConfederation. There is nothing in the “Act”, to alter in any essential respect the Colonialrelationship, or to weaken the Crown’s headship ; nor is there anything in the “Act” toindicate surrender in any degree of that fundamental principle of the British Government : the full legislative and executive power to govern over and throughout the BritishEmpire. An examination of the historical record shows that fraud was recorded in at least fourinstances in relation to its enactment. This is not sufficient to remove the Statute. Fraudmust be proven “from the wording of the Act itself and the manner in which the wordsare used”. This is the law in relation to Statutes. Is the British North America Act fraudulent, from the words and the manner in whichthe words are used ? It is. A Federal Union must be “free and sovereign”, whereas a colony must be “subservient”. No country could be both at the same time. The words are opposite in their meaning. There is no power in heaven or earth that can pass a law to arbitrarily create a Federal Union. It must be a mutual agreement between those adopting their Constitution. Noagreement of any kind has ever been signed between the Provinces of Canada. As an enunciation of motives actuating the Parliament to enact the Statute ; the words“Federally United into One Dominion”, and the manner in which the words are used constitutes fraud and brands the British North America Act as a fraudulent measure. It isimpossible to be Federally United and a Dominion at the same time. Search for Certified Copy of the Act My researches on this subject led me to Ottawa, where I examined the documents inthe Archives ; these, the “Quebec Resolutions” and the “Kingdom of Canada” draft of a“Bill” (Both drafted by our Canadian representatives) are carefully preserved. I desire topublicly thank Colonel Hamilton, custodian of the records, for his assistance. At my request to be shown a “certified” copy of the B.N.A. Act, he regretted that hehad no such copy in the records, but obligingly arranged an appointment for me with Mr.Lemaire, Clerk of the [Canadian] Privy Council. Not having this document, Mr. Lemaireinstructed his secretary to conduct me to the Governor General’s Office, where I waspresented to Mr. Pereira, Chief Secretary. Nor finding this “Act” Mr. Pereira handed me a note for Mr. Hardy, ParliamentaryLibrarian. At the Library I was informed that this was a very valuable document and nodoubt I would find it in the Office of the Secretary of State. Mr. Coleman, the UnderSecretary, delegated three of his assistants to search the premises. Not being able to findit there, Mr. Coleman directed me to Dr. Beauchesne, Clerk of the House of Commons. “Why would “I” have it ?” was the Doctor’s reply to my request. “No documents are kepthere, but you had better see Mr. Blount, Clerk of the Senate. He has a vault where important papers are under lock and key”. Mr. Blount informed me, however, that he did not know of it, bur would open thevault if I would care to look. We descended, with an assistant, to a room below the Senate Chamber, and with the help of a step-ladder lowered two large cases marked 1867 and1868. Not finding the “Certified” copy which is presumably the Charter of the DominionGovernment, I suggested that it might have been destroyed in the fire which burned themain building in 1916, but I was assured that all the documents had been saved ; somehad been discoloured by water ; all that was lost were some pictures in the Galleries. Returning to his office, I inquired if the Senate Journal had any reference to the Actbeing placed before that body. We examined the Journal and another large volume whichcontains a Proclamation from Queen Victoria with the names of the first Senators, also anextract covering the executive activities of the Senate, without success. “Was this Act ever placed before Parliament ?” I asked.“You will have to ask Dr. Beauchesne”, was the answer. Returning to the Commons, Dr. Beauchesne made an exhausting search of his recordswithout finding any reference to the Act in his Journal. “Well, Doctor, I was informed that we had no ‘Certified copy’ of the Act in Vancouver by the Chief Justice of British Columbia, but was assured that I would find it in Ottawa. If it were in Canada it would no doubt in Ottawa. So I think we can assume for thepurpose of my investigations that no certified copy of the British North America Act wasever brought to Canada. Is that so ?” “I am very much afraid that you are correct” was the Doctor’s reply. The First Page Was Left Out — Why ? After the Act was passed by the British Parliament, Feb. 29th, 1867, printed copieswere brought to Canada. These, however, do not contain the first page, which sets forththe enunciation of the motives and the purpose of the enactment. Why was this most important page deleted ? This is a vital question and can best be settled by having a “certified” copy sent to Canada. The Provinces of Canada will then no doubt form a Confederation or Federal Union as they wished, and as set forth in the Resolutions of 1864. No agreement was ever signed by the Provinces of Canada or their representatives toconfer power on a Central Government, which is the only way a Constitution can be created. First, the representatives of the Provinces are appointed or elected to a ConstituentAssembly where the agreement is drafted. This agreement after ratification by the electors is called a Constitution. Let us examine the difference between a Federal Union and a Colony. The definitionof a Federal Union, as given by our law dictionary, and the only definition accepted in aCourt of Law, is “Union of Sovereign Sates, mutually adopting a Constitution”. It is notenough that they be free to unite, they must also be free to reject. This is the meaning ofthe word “mutually”. They must also “adopt” or ratify the agreement by a plebiscite ofthe people for “the people under God are the origin of all just power”. This was a fundamental provision of the “witagenmot”, the early Parliament of the Anglo-Saxons. They had the power to depose their King. This was again enacted by the House of Commonson Jan. 4th, 1649. On Jan. 30th, 1649, Charles I lost his head. That settled the argument. In order that all courts should define words in the same manner the Interpretation Actwas passed in 1889. Section 18 paragraph (3) defines a Colony in these words : “The expression ‘Colony’ shall mean any of Her Majesty’s Dominions, exclusive ofthe British Islands and of British India ; and where parts of such Dominions are underboth a central legislature and local legislatures all parts under the Central legislatureshall, for the purpose of this definition be deemed to be ‘one Colony’ ”. As Canada was the only Dominion with a Central legislature and local legislatures in1889, it is evident that in a Court of Law, Canada could not be deemed to be other than a Colony. The Statute of Westminster, Dec. 11th, 1931, has since changes our status. Section 11says, “Notwithstanding anything in the Interpretations Act 1889, the expression ‘colony’shall not in any Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act include a Dominion or any Province or States forming part of aDominion”. Canada was a Colony before the commencement of this Act, never a Confederation. It is not generally known that the Native Sons of Canada, and more particularly Assembly No. 2 of Vancouver, drafted the Resolution which is the basis for the Statute ofWestminster, a copy of which is in the Parliamentary Library. Governor General Without Proper Authority This Statute gives us a status of equality with Great Britain ; they have no more rightsto issue “Letters Patent” to a Governor General to govern Canada, than Canada has theright to issue “Letters Patent” to a Governor General to govern Great Britain. In 1867 the Colonial Office drafted a “Charter”, which was enacted by the ImperialParliament, in a Private Bill or Statute, uniting four of these Colonies into “One Colony”,without altering their status, of their relation to the Mother Country. Great Britain retained the executive power or legal Sovereignty after the Union as before. In other wordsthey remained Colonies of Great Britain, with one Governor General, instead of four, andLetters Patent granting to him the power to govern, and a Committee of His Majesty’sMost Honourable Privy Council, to administer affairs, in connection with the United Colony. As the New England Colonies were called Dominions and s Wales was a Dominionuntil the reign of George III, this United Colony was called a Dominion. In 1931 the Statute of Westminster, altered this relationship and granted to Canadathe right, to self-government and in order that the Federal Union they previously requested, could be formed, granted to each Province the Sovereignty to create a FederalUnion. This power was granted to them so that could create their own Government, thesame as the Commonwealth of Australia, the Union of South Africa or the Irish FreeState. IV — HOW HAS THE B.N.A. ACT BEEN USED ? The B. N. A. Act has been used as though it were the constitution of Canada, which isnot. It has been used to govern Canada, and it was the intention of Lord Carnarvon and theColonial Office that it should do so, but it was not the intention of the House of Lords or the Commons which enacted it. The Parliament thought it was to be a guide to the creation of a Federal Union. They knew this could only be attained by an agreement betweenthe Provinces, so they were not particularly concerned. As has been shown in a previous section the Provinces were united into One Colony,and Colonies cannot decide on an agreement, for they are not free to sign anything. Thatis why, after the Act was passed, it was never returned to the Provinces for their assent. As the Provinces would necessarily have to be free, before they could legally unite, orincorporate into a Federal Union, the Statute of Westminster provides a paragraph for thispurpose. Paragraph 2 of Section 7, which is discussed in this section, “The Statute ofWestminster grants autonomy”. Although the object or raison d’être of the Act is to provide a guide to the creation of a Federal Union, this scope of the Act has not yet beenexercised. A Legislature of a Province may pass an Act to incorporate a locality, or a districtinto a municipality, but the actual incorporation must be accomplished by the citizens ofthe locality. This was the idea the Imperial Parliament accepted when the enacted theB.N.A. Act. By the terms of the Act the Governor-General is the Government. He received his “LP” to exercise the powers of the Act from the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery; thelatest “LP” were issued to Earl Bessborough and signed by Sir Claude Schuster, March23rd, 1931, eight months prior to the enactment of the Statute of Westminster, Dec. 11th ,1931. As Canada has been raised by the Statute to the “accepted constitutional position” ofequality with GB, the Imperial Government could not grant further “LP”. In a cable to the Imperial authorities in October 1935, I myself protested any “LP” being issued to Lord Tweedsmuir. He received none. Without these all-important LP thepowers granted to the Governor-General in the B.N.A. Act cannot be legally exercised. In the Statutes of Alberta there is an Act — “The Constitutional Questions Determination Act” which provides that any question touching the Constitution of Alberta, orwhere there is a conflict between the Province and the Dominion, the case may be takento the Supreme Court and any person, or class of persons, are entitled to be heard. Sovereign power — is independent of all power from without — it is paramount overall action within. Following is a synopsis of evidence presented before the Special Committee convened in 1935 to investigate the British North America act :— Convened at the House of Commons, Ottawa, February 26th, 1935. F.W. Turnbull, Chairman. Excerpts from the evidence of :— Dr. O.D. Skelton, Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs. Dr. M. Ollivier, K.C., Joint-Law Clerk, House of Commons. Dr. W.P. Kennedy, Professor of Law, University of Toronto. Dr. N. McL. Rogers, Professor of Political Science, Queens University. Dr. A. Beauchesne, K.C., C.M.G., L.L.D., Clerk of the HC. Dr. SKELTON, UNDER SECRETARY of STATE for EXTERNAL AFFAIRS : … Now it might be said, why not trust to growth of convention or custom altogether for the necessary changes in our Constitution ? (sic.) The obvious answer, Ithink, is that the process is too slow, and is applicable only in cases where unanimity has been reached. … No other country in the world looks to the Parliament of another country for theshaping of its constitution. This solution could only be supported if we believe thatCanadians are the only people so incompetent that they cannot work out a solutionof their constitutional problem, and so bias that they alone among the peoples of theworld cannot be trusted to deal fairly with the various domestic interests concerned… It is not safe to leave the question open and ambiguous indefinitely ; for at any timea dispute on a concrete issue may arise. … To retain permanently the intervention of the Parliament of the UK is either superfluous or dangerous. DR. MAURICE OLLIVIER : … Furthermore, our Constitution (sic.) is a law adopted by the British Parliamentexercising its incontestable right of sovereignty toward its Colonies… This explainsthe fact that the British North America act is not a reproduction of the QuebecResolutions… England was free to agree to the resolutions or to disregard them entirely. DR. W.P. KENNEDY, Professor of Law, University of Toronto :— … I think we have got to get away from the idea that the British North America actis a contract or a treaty. I do not want to go into that, but it is true neither in history nor in law. The British North America act is a Statute and has always been interpreted as a Statute. Suppose we now assume that it is necessary to have constituent powers in Canada,powers to change the Constitution (sic.). I approach that problem from two angles. First I want to break the British North America act up… We have got to ask ourselves, “Is the dead hand of the past to be constantly laid with numbing effect on thebody politic”. That is what it really amounts to… If we in Canada are not capable ofinterpreting our own Constitution (sic.) we should not have a Legislature at all. PROFESSOR NORMAN McL. ROGERS, Professor of Political Science, Queens University :— I am thoroughly convinced that the British North America act is not a pactor contract either in the historical or legal sense. BY MR. COWAN : Q.— You get back to this : your start is another Interprovincial Conference ? A.— I am afraid it is. I see no feasible alternative. HON. MR. LAPOINTE : There is no doubt about it. DR. BEAUCHESNE, K.C., C.M.G., L.L.D., Clerk of the House of Commons : It is quite true that if we apply to the British North America act the principles followed in the interpretation of statutes it is not a compact between theProvinces ; it is an Act of Parliament which does not even embody all theresolutions passed in Canada and in London prior to its passage in the British Parliament where certain clauses that had not been recommended by theCanadian Provinces were added. … The Statute of Westminster has alteredour Status… What we want is a new Constitution (sic.). The new Constitution must leave nobody with a grievance. A spirit of conciliation should predominate. For these reasons, the task mustbe entrusted to an independent body in which all the elements of the countrywill be represented. I want the assembly to sit in a City in the West. It would not be necessaryfor a delegate to be a Member of Parliament or of a Provincial Legislature. I would suggest that the assembly do not sit in Ottawa, in order that it maynot have the appearance of being dominated, or even influenced by the Dominion power ; and, as the Western Provinces are of such paramount importance in the country, I suggest the best City for the representatives to gather in would be Winnipeg. Whether our country should be changed from a Dominion to Kingdom isalso a subject which might be discussed. I would suggest that the countrycould be called “The Federated States of Canada”. There have been many disputes about Provincial rights since 1867 and itseems certain that when a new Constitution (sic.) is drawn up the distribution of Federal and Provincial powers will have to be modified. I submit that appeals to the Privy Council should be dealt with by our Constitution. This method would preserve the principle of taking our cases to thehighest tribunal without going out of our own country. If you will allow me, Mr. Chairman, I will just make another suggestion ; ifwe have a constituent assembly and if we discuss the making of a new constitution, I think it is an anomaly that Dominion affairs, should, to a certainextent, be subject to provincial authority. I would suggest that we have a Federal district taking in about 25 square miles on each side of the OttawaRiver. I would not have minority rights discussed. There is nothing more dangerous in Canada than discussion of minority rights. A discussion of themwould wreck the whole Constituent Assembly I think the time is ripe for a change in the Constitution (sic.). I do no thinkyou would need much publicity in order to draw to the attention of the people of this country that the British North America act is inadequate. V — HOW DID WE GET THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER, 1931 ? Summarizing and consolidating the results of their meetings from 1911, the Imperial Conference of 1926, composed of representatives of all of the Dominions and of GB,agreed to draft a “Bill” to be presented to Parliament which would enact a measure to putinto effect the accepted constitutional position, that each of the Dominions had an equality of status with the UK. Canada without question may be said to have taken the leading part in these conferences, and in 1926 our Prime Minister, the RT. Hon. Wm. Lyon Mackenzie King, movedthe first resolution crystallizing the findings of the previous conferences and is a synopsisof the accepted opinion and attitude of the Canadian people toward the empire and theUK. It covers all points which are incorporated in the Statute of Westminster — particularly that Canada should be elevated constitutionally to a position of equality with the UK— states the position of Canada in regard to assisted immigration and Canada’s naturalresources — our previously expressed attitude on Imperial Defence, that the method of appointment of the Governor-General of Canada is ripe for a radical change more in consonance with National dignity — that the channels of communication between Canadaand any other country should be direct. As this Resolution was drafted and sent to our Prime Minister, by Assembly No. (2) of the Native Sons of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., prior to his departure for the 1926 conference, the last paragraph is quoted verbatim :— “LOCARNO, WAR, NEUTRALITY, etc. This Assembly is convincedthat so long as the present anomalies of Canada’s status continue, the advantages to Canada from participation in Imperial Conferences are largely negative. The Conference is built on a Constitutional fiction — that all the representatives meet as equals. The test — What is Canada Constitutionally ? is thetrue test. And until Canada, either by her own act, or by Imperial concession, attains Sovereignty as an independent Nation under the Crown ; withinternational recognition, her position in respect to Britain’s wars, neutrality,and her international relationships in general, will remain clouded and obscure. That position will be and remain, both constitutionally and internationally, that of a colonial status. Mere rhetoric cannot overcome this inescapable fact”. This Resolution which was the key-note of the conference was seconded by PrimeMinister Hertzog of South Africa. A copy of this Resolution with an affidavit signed by the Custodian of the Recordsof the Native Sons of Canada, D.H. Elliot, stating that the Resolution was presented tothe Assembly by Brother R. Rogers Smith is in the Parliamentary Library at Ottawa. In the Imperial Conference of 1929 the sections of the Act were condensed intoparagraphs to comply with Parliamentary practice and procedure. In 1930, Prime Minister R.B. Bennett called a conference of the Premiers of the Provinces, when Paragraph 1of Section 7 was added. Why this section was included is puzzling. It reads : “Nothing inthis Act shell be deemed to apply to the repeal, alteration or amendment of the BritishNorth America act 1867 to 1930 or any order, rule or regulation made thereunder”. Asthe B.N.A. Act can only be construed as a “guide to the creation of a Federal Union”, andas this was the enunciation of the motive which prompted the Imperial Parliament to enact it, and as it will most certainly be scrapped when a Federal Union is consummated,why was section 7, paragraph 1 added ? It does not alter the meaning of the Statute ofWestminster one iota. It seems to indicate a lack of knowledge of the British NorthAmerica act, which is not surprising as they had no certified copy to consult or examine. VI — THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER GRANTS AUTONOMY As Dr. Beauchesne states in his evidence “The Statute of Westminster has alteredour status”. Section 11 states that after the commencement of the Act no Dominion ornor Province or State forming part of a Dominion shall be considered to be a Colony. It is acknowledged that the status of Canada before the commencement of the Actwas that of a Colony, and it may be said in this connection that until the Provinces ofCanada had been elevated to a position of autonomy, they had no voice in stating how they should be governed. The Statute of Westminster “altered our status” by grantingcomplete autonomy to the Provinces. To state that because the Provinces of Canada have used the B.N.A. Act for seventyyears, or because the Statute of Limitations, or for the reason that the Act has been accepted as the corner-stone of Canadian Law and Legislation, that the B.N.A. Act is a constitution, is not correct reasoning. First, because the Provinces of Canada do not use the B.N.A. Act as a whole. It isan instrument for the exercise of the powers of the G. It was not accepted by the Provinces at any time since its enactment, but has been protested by them on many occasions. We may use the Act as a guide to the creation of a constitution, or the basis of anagreement between the Provinces, as this was the object or thin intention of the Parliament which enacted it ; or we may disregard it entirely if we choose. Why ? Because the Provinces of Canada are completely autonomous today. EachProvince is a political unit, without a political superior. Although the Statute affects other Dominions as well as Canada (that is to say, theCommonwealth of Australia, the Union of South Africa, New Zealand, the Irish FreeState and Newfoundland) it also extends autonomy to each individual Province of Canada. Paragraph 2 of Section 7 states that the provisions of Section 2 of this Act shall extend to laws made by any of the Provinces of Canada and to the powers of the legislatures of such Provinces. The provisions of Section 2 are those which grant autonomy. Autonomy is indivisible ; either you have it, or you have not. Why are these autonomous powers not granted to the States of Australia individually or the the States of South Africa ? Because these States had created their constitutions, before the commencement of the Statute of Westminster. Granting Autonomy to Canada as a whole was not sufficient, in the opinion of theImperial Parliament which enacted the Statute, for they knew it would be necessary forthe Provinces to grant their power to a Central Government, and this could only be donewhen they were free. (This is further discussed in the Section “The Federated States ofCanada”.) Although Canada and, more particularly, British Columbia, took the lead in placingbefore the Imperial Conference the reasons for the enactment of the Statute of Westminster, Canada has not taken advantage of its provisions. The other Dominions affected have taken advantage of this measure, and althoughremaining within the Empire, have their own Constitutions. The Irish Free State has noGovernor-General, the Premier now acts as the representative of His Majesty. South Africa is no longer “tied to the apron strings of grandma” (Hertzog). A Parliament of a Dominion is not a Central Legislature of a Colony, and no alteration of its Charter can make it so. Section 3 and 4 of the Statute of Westminster do notrefer to the Central Legislature at Ottawa. This can only be construed as it states, and aParliament representing the Provinces of Canada, must be one whose charter is grantedby an agreement between the Provinces, or in other words is created by them. VII — NEXT STEP – “THE FEDERATED STATES OF CANADA” It is true that the Federated States of Canada would not be dependent in any way ofthe Imperial Parliament for their government. Why should Canada be dependent ? Are the States of Australia, South Africa or the Irish Free State, less a part of theEmpire because they constructed Constitutions and are free to govern themselves ? The story of Confederation is a myth, and those that think that Sir John A. Macdonald was the “Father of Confederation” know little about this question. In a letter toLord Knutsford, Secy. Of State for the Colonies, at the time the first meetings were heldbetween the States of Australia regarding a Federal Union in 1888 ; Sir John expresseshis regret for the defeat of 1867 in the following words “If the Statute (the B.N.A. Act)had only followed the Canadian draft of the bill, Australia ere this would have a government similar to the Kingdom of Canada”. Before this, and because Sir John knew the inside story of the “Fenian Raids” of1866, and the hair-trigger relationship between GB and the USA, he reluctantly acceptedappointment as one of the British representatives in the negotiations to agree on the termsof the TW, and from beginning to end of the negotiations he found it necessary to fightagainst the sacrifice of Canadian rights. This is seen clearly in the following extract froma letter he wrote at the time to Dr. Tupper :— “I must say that I am greatly disappointed at the course taken by the BritishCommissioners. They seem to have only one thing on their minds — that is,to go home with a Treaty in their pockets, settling everything, no matter atwhat cost to Canada… The effect which must be produced on the public mind in Canada by a declaration from both parties in the Imperial Parliament against our course, will greatly prejudice the idea of British connection, as British connection will have proved itself a farce. I do not like tolook at the consequences, but we are so clearly in the right, that we mustthrow the responsibility on England”. Is this the “Father of Confederation” speaking ? If no ulterior motive was served, why were the stories of Confederation circulated ? All that can be said is that the gullibility of Canadians was deplorable. No member of the Dominion Government today would seriously contend that heknows anything about the British North America act, for they know there is no certifiedcopy in Canada and anything less than an examination of a certified copy can only beclassed as assumption, belief, and the ability to produce factual evidence. The next step is an interprovincial conference where an agreement can be reachedupon the powers to be conferred on the Central Government, and the powers which mustbe retained by the Provinces. Federation First of all power must be conferred upon appointed representatives of theProvinces, so as to carry on the Government of Canada and with the power to callan election, as soon as possible, after the Constitution has been ratified by thepeople of each and all the Provinces. NOTE On the opposite page is set forth the exact wording of the first page of theB.N.A. Act, containing the Preamble of the Act, which has not been published inthe official copies of the Statutes either in Great Britain or in Canada. 1867 BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACTEnacted byHer Most Gracious MajestyQUEEN VICTORIAandTHE IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT BY REASON OF THE REQUEST OF THE COLONIESforFEDERAL GOVERNMENT IT IS EXPEDIENT THEREFORE THAT THEY HAVELAWS AND REGULATIONS TO GUIDE THEM. The first page of the British North America Act was deleted after passing the House of Lords and before it was assented to by the Commons. This page states : “By reason of the request of the Colonies for FederalGovernment. It is expedient therefore that they have laws and regulationsto guide them”. Here we have the reason for and the purpose of the Act. If this page had not been deleted, Canada would ere this have formed a Federal Government. We did not Federate in 1867, and the Governor-General was a corporationsole until the Statute of Westminster was enacted. What are we now ? We certainly are not a confederation, as there has been no confederation since thatdate. The authority was given to the provinces. They were made equal with GB. The power went to the provinces. Ottawa was never a province or a colony. Howdid it get authority ? It was only a committee of men, half appointed and halfelected, to aid and advise the Governor-General. Now there was no accredited Governor-General and no need for a committeeto aid and advise him. The provinces are Sovereign and will remain so until we the people, throughour Provincial Governments, create a country. TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN. There is no other path. It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance (Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows: Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System. Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans). 1. The convention on climate change that: a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it c) we need global government 2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that: a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change b) all present consumption and production modes are “unsustainable” c) we need global government The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system: 1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state 2. The provinces became sub-national member states 3. The local/municipal became a UN City State All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money. _____________________________________________________________ Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System. Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans).

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Deputation to the Town - To restore lawful jurisdiction and Unalienable Rights Today we are questioning if fraud has taken place within our local governments as it appears they may be governed by a global entity through public/private partnerships. Our local representatives may or may not know this and I’d like to present what we have found. To our elected officials I have to ask: If you, as our elected officials, are not the body in power & control, who is? Who’s your boss? Who’s pushing the sustainable development and climate action plans within our organizations? Do you feel at all manipulated that such plans of overreach were being slid past you before you even found your feet within your newly elected positions? Why do you think that was done to you? If these ideologies that are being forced upon the residents turn out to be unlawful and out of your area of jurisdiction, who do you think will take the fall or go to jail? Exposure of widespread corruption within our Federal, Provincial and local levels of government are more extreme and more frequent, with Trudeau’s billion dollar green slush fund being the latest. The Stephen Joseph Harper government was no better: Canadian banks received 'secret' bailout in 2008 We were never told the true cost of a $114-billion “secret bailout” for the country’s biggest Private (PPP) banks during the financial crisis “At its peak in March 2009, support for Canadian banks reached $114-billion. To put that into perspective, that would have made up seven per cent of the Canadian economy in 2009 and was worth $3,400 for every man, woman and child in Canada.” three of the country’s biggest banks — CIBC, Bank of Montreal and Scotiabank — were receiving government support that was equal to or more than the value of the company’s shares. Airbus Deal The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraft for Air Canada in the 1980s (when it was a crown corporation) by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. It was alleged that German Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber had bribed Mulroney to purchase Airbus aircraft. Mulroney countered that he had not acted inappropriately and that the allegations were part of a smear campaign. Mulroney sued the federal government (NO HE SUED US WITH RAISING TAXES ) for $50 million. Ultimately, the RCMP ended its investigation without laying charges. The government settled out of court with Mulroney in 1997. However, it was later determined that Mulroney had indeed acted inappropriately and had received at least $225,000 in cash. Foreign Countries Infiltrating Foreign countries infiltrating Canada, spy chief warns -The Canadian Press Published Friday, January 7,2011 https://www.ctvnews.ca/foreign-countries-infiltrating-canada-spy-chief-warns-1.593597 In 2011, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director Richard Fadden warned of foreign countries infiltrating Canada at municipal levels. So, my question for you is why are you taking your orders from known criminals, without questioning? “Because we were told to do it” has never been a valid defence. Perhaps, this presentationmay provide clarity. Did you know OUR Town and Regional Districts/or County are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in de facto law? In this UN partnership, everything can be done by the signatures of only 2 people, the Mayor and the CAO or, in the case of the Regional District or County, the Chair of the Board and the CAO. These two people can call a local emergency which is why you had better know who they work for. Municipalities mandated COVID-19 vaccine Murder Charges for Pushing the Vaccine (death shot) (SHARE) Therefore, instead of gathering in their unlawful offices, we have instead, gathered in this neutral place with men and women. The agenda today is: 1) To inform elected representatives of suspected fraud that has taken place. 2) To give the restructuring history of all municipalities under the UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 where Canada Inc. became a UN member nation state in 1992 and appears to have ceased existing as a sovereign country. - The Municipal Primer - FCM and CCME are just a few involved in the Agenda This Booklet explains how these non-government City Municipalities took over your City Hall, convert official status, assume regulatory control, and leave th elocallyelected officials holding nothing but incredible personal liability for everything they agree to sign. SLIDE 5 - Promoting Sustainable Developement Book - If you would like one please email [email protected] SLIDE 6 – The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide An Introduction To Sustainable Development Planning By most accounts, the UN Agenda 21 sounds fantastic....at first glance, just as the Climate Action Plans of both the Regional Districts or County of OUR TOWN do. Only until further investigation are other secret agendas revealed, that are not of benefit to all, especially the earth. SLIDE 7 – Agenda 21 quotes: Now we will explain some of the history that is crucial that must be Educated. The following is quoted from the “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”. “The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) produced Agenda 21 in 1992, and since that time Agenda 21 has become the guiding international blueprint for development into the twenty-first century. During the preparation of Agenda 21, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) worked to ensure that thisglobal plan alsoaddressed the roles and perspectives of local governments.” As a result, the UN framework was provided to local governments... supposedly? working with their communities, to create their own local action plans for sustainable development. The reality of this implementation isnot as advertised. (SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS) SLIDE 8 – Sustainable Development - Agenda 21 quotes Continued: To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully definedand ICLEI became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda.” To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully defined. The challenge of this new program is to develop, test, and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems (e.g., cities, villages, neighborhoods, and families) that make life possible and worthwhile. No one Fully understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis." SLIDE 9 – Dowdeswell -Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme An example is: a quote from Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, UN Environment Programme stated that “terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just another book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today’s historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...” Is this management or manipulation? "Terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just a Book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today's historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...) SLIDE 10 - Corporation of Canada Signs on..... (Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows: Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System. Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans). 1. The convention on climate change that: a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it c) we need global government 2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that: a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change b) all present consumption and production modes are “unsustainable” c) we need global government The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system: 1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state 2. The provinces became sub-national member states 3. The local/municipal became a UN City State All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money. Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System. Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans Slide 11- Clip from Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty...... Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty United Nations Global Governance UN members use the trademarked sustainable development goals logos. This helps you know who’s getting money from the UN/WEF/World Bank. Video on Rumble "We the People Constitutional Conventions" Title: Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty...... Brian Mulroney signs on to United Nations Climate Change Agenda 1992 SLIDE 12 – United Nations Development Goals Logo By the year 2000, countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN, G7, G20, Council of Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, to name a few of the major players. Every one of these organizations is a foreign based non-governmental organization (NGO). Every member of all these organizations areUN-ELECTED! Our Town was captured by the United Nations/World Economic Forum by the declaration of Office they took when “sworn” in. Once they are “sworn” to serve the municipality, instead of us the men and women, they have agreed to “Municipal government” and “regions” instead of “de jure” (lawful) adminstraion locally. They are under a false oath. SLIDE 13 – Canada Inc. under the PPP Global Governance System The “public officials, the Mayor, Councillors and Regional Directors of becamepartnered with a Private Corporation, The Corporation of our Town and The Corporation of the Regional District/County. An appointed Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The local officials became employees to the United Nations by agreeing to take the Community Charter previously known as The Municipal Act, “Declaration of Office” (or DOO). The new de facto United Nations Global Governance System is a corporate (veil) structure set like a "burger chain" franchise. So, instead of being "governed", we get "serviced". Policies are set at the top of the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) top level and downloaded to the ones below like this: SLIDE 14 – Guide for Municipal Council Members and Regional Directors/County in your Province,Territory Oct 12,2018 Prepared by Colin Stewart and Marie Watmough The United Nations Agenda was implemented in every Province and Territory in Secret! The DOO is a commercial (UN) declaration and public officials are NOT to take this corporate “oath”. When they do, they become “employees” – in agreement with the Municipal Act or Community Charter and therefore they MUST follow it so taking the DOO gets them into a lot of Doo Doo – us too. NOTE: "CSIS has knows about foreign interference in Canada for at least the last 30 years. Every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau today have been compromised. Our Local Towns all have been compromised as well. ____________________________________________________________ 2.0 THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERMENTS IN OUR PROVINCE/TERRITORY BEFORE 1998 the Local Government Act of our Province was knows as the Municipal Act, and it was almost a sole source for legislature enacted the Community Charter, and removed from the Local Government Act a great many of the powers of the municipalities, incorporating them into the community Charter SLIDE 15 - Community Charter Asserted in May 29, 2003 in British Columbia/Provinces/ Territories Municipal government = the ORGANIZATION OF THE CORPORATION. The “government” they form internally, the MUNICIPALITY’S “governing officers”, the City’s “Board of Directors”, the City’s LAWS which are legal and commercial. Municipal government is the BUSINESS, the corporation, that provides our services. Part 2- Municipal Purposes and Powers Division- Purposes and Fundamental Powers Municipalities and their Councils 6 (1) A municipality is a corporation of the residents of its area. (2) The Governing body a municipality is its council (go slow here – 3 slides to fit in as you speak with long quotes) SLIDE 16 – Back to "Local Agenda 21" SLIDE 17- Agenda 21 quote – increasing pace... SLIDE 18 – Sustainable development.... More quotes from The Local Agenda 21... The UN public/private partnerships look like government and spend like government but they are NOT government. They are in de facto possession of sovereign powers. The UN Global Government system overturns the rightful government and installs its own defacto government; has possession of governing powers without right and maintains itself by force and captured regulatory control. SLIDE 19– Defacto Definition _________________________________________________________ De facto "de facto" is defined as accepted (as fact) but unauthorized and illegitimate; instealled and founded in decit and fraud, without lawful title." ____________________________________________________________ SLIDE 20–"De facto Government" A defacto government is defined as “private, corporate secret Mayor/Council/Board; non-governmental organizations.” SLIDE 21 "De Jure Government For those that may not know, The word “De jure” means “rightful, legitimate, constitutional and legal;elected andin compliance witheveryaspect of law.” A De jure government is always public;sovereign and autonomous SLIDE 22 – United Nations Global Government... -overturns the rightful government and installs it's own instead -has possession of governing powers without right -maintains itself by force and capture regulatory control If we wonder why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government. A forensic audit of our the Town and the Regional District will reveal exactly how manyBillions of dollars have been funnelled both from AND TO the UN through ICLEI and the provincial municipalities since 1994 SLIDE 22 – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) is an Act created to protect the de facto Unlawful system! CANADA Inc. being a UN member state has NO Authority to implement foreign mandates, policies, treaties or any agreements that violate our Unalienable Rights see - Clearfield Doctrine - https://rumble.com/v42e26t-clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co.-v.-united-states-318-us.-363-371..html SLIDE - 23 The CANADIAN Constitution Act The CANADIAN Constitution Act; the Charter of Rights Act; the Bill of Rights Act and the Coronation Oath Act are all de-facto! This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION that MUST Be Educated. These Acts will Not Protect you , your Property or Your Family. The Last four years have be an eye opener to many that there is and Never have been Laws protecting us from the blatant Corruption! They ARE and always have been De Facto! SLIDE - 24 Criminal Code of Canada Inc. Section 46(1)(b) Canada is like Coca- Cola, Walmart, McDonalds - For example Canada makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines - Canada Inc calls them criminal codes as they cannot call them Law's as they are NOT Laws. Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers and/or dependants. Here are crucial FACTS you MUST fully comprehend! Companies (Canada Inc.) establish rules to govern the conduct and actions of their employees. These rules should leave no room for discretion and argument. The rules must be enforced and action be taken every time a rule is violated. So you as a man/woman are identified as a person/corporation not as a man/woman The purpose of section 32 is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to man/woman The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following: The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. absolute - no exceptions The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect the Corporation of Canada Inc. rights - NOTman/woman. Criminal Code of Canada Inc. is a protective measure for the corporations/business/company Canada Inc. Criminal Code definition of “person” includes bodies in addition to corporations, and it is important to ensure that the same rules for attributing criminal High treason 46(1)Every one commits high treason who, in Canada, (a)kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her; (b)levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or (c)assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are. Marginal note:Treason (2)Every one commits treason who, in Canada, (a)uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province; (b)without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada; (c)conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a); (d)forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or (e)conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act. Marginal note:Canadian citizen (3)Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada, (a)commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or (b)commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2). Marginal note:Overt act (4)Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html Canada is like Coca- Cola or Walmart - For example Walmart makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines to You now have your answer why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government. .Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers ond/or dependants. To those that are elected – YOU WERE ELECTED TO FORM THE GOVERNMENT ONOUR BEHALF – WITHOURTRUST.YOU ARE OUR LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNENT.The town staff and regional district/County staff are NOT the government. YOU CAN THINK you have the power and authority but you DON'T. You are NO MORE than one vote at a table!! Unfortunately, you have been fraudulently partnered through yourcontract and thosecontractsmust be renegotiated.A rightful mayor and council appoint the CAO and staff, and the mayor and council MUST dismiss them. Elected directors form the local Board of Regional District/County that can appoint the CAO and staff and you can directly dismiss them. With that, you can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we’re making here today. It is now at the point that we really need our elected representatives to step up, step down or step aside. Now, questions for elected officials that demand answers: 1. As elected officials what did you sign? 2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”? 3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer? 4. Did you sign more than one oath? 5. What you signed designates what jurisdiction you’re operating under. 6. The possible proof of the Town and Regional District/County fraud may be in your oath – - who did you swear to serve? A“Covenant” is not an oath with regards to our Town. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath. 7. Where is the published law that has been presented to the the Men/Women; debated; brought to vote and been passed and regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships? If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are NOT compliant to laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”. Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyound the powers". "If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers". acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" amd those that are untra vires "INVALID" Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyond the powers". "If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers". acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "INVALID" We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government and regional districts/counties were serving the men and women of their areas in their best interests. In the coming days, the mayor and councillors and the Regional District Directors/County will receive an electronic information package which will contain the text of this deputation as well as thought provoking supporting documentation of which we have spoken about here today. As for the rest of us sitting here, there is no “caped crusader” that will whisk in to change this for us, we have to be proactive and cannot sit back and relax. It is up to us to each of us here to become involved. Here’s your chance. Thank you for your patience, your respect in listening and your active participation for changing our future for the benefit of all. Month Day, 2024 Deputation Presentation To: The Town of ________ and The Regional District/County of ___________________ By Names of Men and Women We require a written response to the questions by Month Day, 2024. Month Day, 2024 Names of each man or woman Area location - District /Couty To The Mayor : Name and Councillors: Names of each councillor And to: Area “A”; Area “B” and Area “C” Directors of the Regional District or County name sof each member (respectively); and Chair name RE: Deputation of men and women dated Month Day, 2024 Dear Sirs and Madams, The enclosed deputation and supporting documents shows that it appears you are acting in three (3) different legal capacities – public; private and international. Did you know our Town and Regional District /County offices are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in defacto law? You can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we have made. The men and women who undertook the deputation and those who support it understood they elected you to act in and for the local public office ONLY, and therefore are requiring a written response to the following questions by 5:00 p.m.,Day, Month, 2023. Questions for elected officials that demand answers: 1. As newly elected officials what did you sign? 2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”? 3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer? 4. Did you sign more than one oath? 5. Who did you swear to serve? The possible proof of the Town and Regional District fraud may be in your oath. A “Covenant” is not an oath with regards to the Town of ______. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath with regards to the Regional District or County. Please produce any and all, Oaths, Covenants, Declarations of office or any other contract you have signed with regards to your service to the Town of _______ or The Regional District/County. 6. Where is the published law that has been presented; debated; brought to vote and been passed regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships? If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are not compliant laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”. We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Names of Men and Woman Enclosed: • Deputation Title Page • Questions for each elected official to respond to • Deputation Presentation – Paper Copy • Deputation Supporting Power Point – Paper Copy • Who’s Who in Government? - Paper Copy • Links Page – Paper Copy • USB – Video of Deputation • Restoring Your Local Peace, Order & Good Governance TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN. There is no other path. It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html B PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

UNALIENABLE RIGHTS VS INALIENABLE RIGHTS UNALIENABLE RIGHTS The state of a thing or right which cannot be sold Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable. Some things are unalienable, in consequence of particular provisions in the law forbidding their sale or transfer, as pensions granted by the government. The natural rights of life and liberty are UNALIENABLE. – Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition “Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.” – Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523: You can not surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights; they are a gift from the Creator to the individual and cannot under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. All individual’s have unalienable rights. INALIENABLE RIGHTS Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights. – Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101. You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent either actually or constructively. Inalienable rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government. Persons have inalienable rights. Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Welcome to Constitutional Conventions Educational website with some very import facts about Canada which, technically, began with the British North America Act of 1867. https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ For Canadians, the answers to the following questions should be common knowledge as the content should have been mandatory learning in our education system. There is a reason it is not, and Constitutional Conventions will expose all of this. “There are two ways to be fooled. One is doing No research and the other is to repeat the regurgitated indoctrination to repeat the history of Lies” Dallas K Hills So… here are 11 very important questions that you need to ask yourself: Where are the Articles of Confederation, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why was Canada known as the “Dominion of Canada” a British colony until 1938, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why in 1867 was the BNA act created to be Letters Patent for a Governor General to the Dominion of Canada if Canada had confederated and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why in 1893, would the British Parliament deem it necessary to repeal certain sections of the BNA act, with the “Statute Law Revisions act” if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why in 1931 would the British parliament create the “Statute of Westminster” to nullify the Dominion of Canada, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why in 1946 did a foreign Monarch, King George VI appoint a representative for the UK, a Governor General and then command the Parliament of Canada to create Letters Patent and command the PM at that time to sign on his behalf those Letters Patent in 1947 for his Governor General, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a Sovereign Nation? [email protected] Why did PM Trudeau in 1982 have the government create the “Canada Bill” and then take that Bill to a foreign Monarch and have her parliament pass that Bill as the “Canada act, 1982” if Canada confederated 153 years earlier and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] Why do Prime Ministers and other officials when sworn into office here in Canada, swear their allegiance to a foreign monarch, Queen Elizabeth, and not to the people of Canada if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] If Canada is a sovereign nation, why does the Government of Canada in their Interpretations act define Canada as the internal waters and territorial seas if Canada confederated in 1867? [email protected] Why was it necessary in 1990 to sue a member of the federal parliament, J. Littlechild MP, to force him to do his duty to his constituents and have the courts rule against his constituents, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign Nation? [email protected] Why in the “Constitution act, 1867” of Canada is there no clause that allows for land for the Government of Canada to become a sovereign nation if Canada Confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? [email protected] If the Sovereigns in the 12 sovereign nations (Provinces and Territories all have Act they refer to as Constitution Act) could awaken to what the Government of Canada Inc. really is (master that owns them upon their ignorance and consent) and take the blinders off put there by those who call themselves the government, we could all have a bright future. “Constitutional Conventions has the Solution to actually do this! Your Invited, together we will correct the false History” – Dallas K Hills The Government of Canada Inc. has painted itself as some religious fairy tales set out to save everyone and keep them safe. Once people realize the truth and claim ownership over their land, they can truly be free. Let us help you see the truth, at Constitutional Conventions website. [email protected] “You never change things by fighting in their existing corrupt System. To change something, build a Solution that makes the existing corrupt system obsolete” – Dallas K Hills These are historical Facts to educate Canadians the Solution to end the Lie, and establish a True Sovereign Nation with Liberty , Freedom , Prosperity, Property Rights, and Land Rights. Join the Solution – Share to Family and Friends

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Canadians Need to be Educated About Canada’s history Constitutional Conventions Canadians need to be educated about Canada’s history – this is absolutely key if the people of the Canadian provinces have any chance of taking control of their lives and what belongs to them. Use the FLYER to help educate yourselves and others to the Solution. http://ConstitutionalConventions.ca “Constitutional Conventions web site has all the information” To understand where we are, we must first understand how we got here… Deep research has unearthed key events, which have both created and hidden the truth of what Canada is, and how you are governed. (Under a Dictatorship unaccountable to We The People) Event: From the 1700s into the next century, England and France were tense partners representing both Upper and Lower Canada. General Wolfe’s death in the final battle on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, secured victory for England, the prize ultimately known as, ‘Canada INC ’. The Treaty of Paris joined the formerly British controlled Upper Canada with France’s Lower Canada into the French legal entity – a Corporation Sole, the ‘Province of Quebec’. The amalgamation process from 1759 through 1763 seated the first British Governor General within that Corporation Sole, which in 1787 amalgamated all of ‘Canada’ enabling Britain to seat a Governor General to rule over their Colonies known then as: the ‘Province of Canada’ and New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. For 80 years between 1787 and 1867, the British placed many Governors General into the Corporation Sole. Issuing Letters Patent, the British Monarchy thereby proclaimed that Governor Generals held the ‘power’ to create and control the government of Canada, as a British Colony. Event: Delegates from Canada had no part in drafting the British North America Act, March 29, 1867, and no certified copy of this act was brought back to Canada by the delegates. The Act was drafted by Lord Thring, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. It is not a Constitution for it constitutes nothing. It simply emphasizes the power of the Governor-General to appoint and remove a Privy Council to ‘aid and advise’ him and to state that the Governor-General has the power to pass an ‘order-in-council’ by himself individually as the case requires. ( An ‘order-in-council’ is equal to an Act of Parliament.) One score and two years later the Interpretations Act, 1889, was passed, stating that Canada is a Colony. This gives the lie to the story of Confederation and brands it as a reductio ad absurdum. ( disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion (the carrying of something to an absurd extreme) Another recent absurdity is that a House and Senate of British Subjects debating the adoption of a Flag and Anthem. You say you have never heard of this before! You are not alone in this. The ‘Dominion of Canada’ meant the British Empire would retain their prize, the Governor General was then able to control all of Canada. John A. MacDonald, knighted as Sir John A., was ultimately a traitor to the people he represented in Canada. Joining the British mainland colonies, they created the Dominion – Canada East, now Quebec; Canada West, now Ontario; along with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Event: The year, 1868. Through their Royal Charter established in 1670 by King Charles 2nd, the privately held Hudson’s Bay Company employed land usage west of Quebec and Ontario, then known as Rupert’s Land. In 1868, British Parliament created the ‘Rupert’s Land Act’ to allow the Hudson’s Bay Company to sell use-of-land back to the Monarch, Queen Victoria. The following year, Hudson’s Bay Company finalized the transaction by signing the “Deed of Surrender”. In 1871 Queen Victoria transferred the use of those lands to the ‘Dominion of Canada’, operated by the Governor General to settle the land and create the western provinces, the allodial title would be held by the Court in Chancery for the British Empire until 1931. Event: The year, 1901. With Queen Victoria’s death, the repeal of Section 2 of the BNA Act came into force, deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of Section 2 has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria. Event: The year, 1931. British Parliament passed the ‘Statute of Westminster’ allowing their Dominions to act independently. This would allow the said Dominions to federate and create their own Constitutions. Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa did – Canada did not. Why didn’t Canada federate? What does it really mean for us as “Canadians” today? Follow the money… to learn how certain forces active even today, were determined not to surrender their cherished positions of power. Continuing by way of deception, these forces kept alive the illusion of ‘Canadian Confederation’ and ‘Sovereignty’. This deliberate illusion continued throughout various iterations of the BNA Act, later called the “Constitution Acts” of 1940, 43, 49, 60, 65, 74, 75 and finally, 1982. Event: The year, 1946. King George VI appointed a Governor General to Canada. In 1947, he commanded the Parliament of Canada to create a commission to write Letters Patent for his Governor General, he then commanded Prime Minister Mackenzie King to sign the new “Letters Patent” on his behalf. The letters patent references the BNA act, 1867 “Letters Patent” enabling the Governor General to give Royal assent to the Income Tax act 1948. The Governor General sits in Ottawa and his Lieutenant Governors sit in each of the provinces – to report not to you the people, but to the “Queen in Right of Canada”. Today some statutes created by the various provincial governments or the Federal government receive Royal Accent, the positions of Lt. Governor ., GG and Queen of Canada are simply fictional figureheads with NO standing in law. Event: 1952 the Royal Styles and Titles act is created by the Parliament of Canada for the Queen of Canada, yes that’s correct the Queen of Canada proclaims through this act, to be the Queen of Canada, not joking. This should clear up any wonder over why at the inauguration ceremony of 2019, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and all elected members swore allegiance – hand-upon-Bible – to the Queen of Canada and not to the People of Canada. You may now have realized why. But wait, how does this work… according to the Statutes Law Revisions Act of 1893, Section 2 of the BNA act, 1867 was repealed, so what Queen? It’s time to discover the far-reaching impact against all of us! Event: The year, 1982. To prevent people from discovering the illusion, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Cabinet created the ‘Canada Bill’, delivering directly to the self-styled ‘Queen of Canada’, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, for her delivery of it to the British Parliament to thereby pass it as the “Canada Act”, 1982. Trudeau would “patriate” the defunct BNA act 1867, to Canada – a photocopy, the original still residing in the UK Parliamentary Archives. Upon returning, Trudeau convinced all provinces to ratify the deception of the new ‘Constitution’. This was of the utmost of importance, without the provinces ratifying this Act of a foreign parliament it could not become Supreme Law (Law of the Sea) here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. All the provinces with the exception of Quebec signed off. Their problem, the Constitution Act was NOT ratified and has NO standing here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. The outcome of this adventure saw Trudeau retiring from politics, leaving his mess behind to be sorted out by future politicians. To ensure the deception was laid to rest, the “Government of Canada” knew they needed to amend ‘The Constitution Act, 1982’. There was the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, followed five years later by the Charlottetown Accord. These accords failed and the “Government of Canada” did not get what it wanted. As both Accords failed, the federal authority in 1995 let sleeping dogs lie, pretending everything was as it should be. After all, the people of Canada had yet to figure it out. Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation. “Constitutional Conventions” is the Solution to create an accountable government for the People by The People. These fascinating hidden truths will be revealed. Join The Solution, plenty to learn. SOVEREIGN FOREVER SHARE, LIKE & RT Any and all information from Constitutional Conventions must be given to the original author by citing the source for original content http://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html A beneficiary is a person (or entity) who is designated to receive the benefits of property owned by someone else. https://www.ontario.ca/page/get-or-replace-ontario-birth-certificate CIPO online \https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/canadian-intellectual-property-office/en Alberta Live Birth Cerificate https://formsmgmt.gov.ab.ca/Public/DVS11163B.xdp BC Live Birth Order certificates and copies https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/life-events/order-certificates-copies Canadian Intellectual Property Office https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/canadian-intellectual-property-office/en B PROOF OF CLAIM A beneficiary is a person (or entity) who is designated to receive the benefits of property owned by someone else. Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

In this letter he made it clear to Mr. Levesque that Quebec was, and continues to be, a sovereign nation, as do ALL provinces in Corporation of Canada.Spruce Grove, Alta., R.R. I, November 23rd, 1976. The Hon. Rene Levesque, Premier-elect, Province of Quebec, Quebec, P.Q. Dear Mr. Levesque: Congratulations on your magnificent personal victory and that of your Parti Quebecois in the recent Quebec election. As a student of Canadian constitutional history and of Canadian constitutional problems for some 40 years, I am tremendously interested in the constitutional implications of your recent political victory. For 14 years, from 1935 to 1949, it was my privilege to serve as a member of the House of Commons, from the province of Alberta. The withholding of assent to some Alberta legislation in those years by the Lieutenant-Governor and the disallowance of other Alberta legislation by the people at Ottawa, set me to investigating how these things could be. I was assisted in my studies by R. Rogers Smith, who was personally acquainted with a onetime private secretary to John A. MacDonaId at the time when the B.N.A. Act was being enacted. Through this source I have become acquainted with much information concerning the history of the B.N.A. Act which is not to be found in text books. All this information has led me to the conclusion that the existing constitutional circumstances are shocking to the point of unbelief. However, in my considered opinion, after 40 years of intensive study, these existing constitutional circumstances are of such a nature that they can be of extreme advantage to you in governing your province. I am enclosing copies of some of the addresses which I delivered in the House of Commons on the subject, as well as copies of a pamphlet by Mr. Smith, dealing with the same subject. If you have not already been made acquainted with this material, I trust it will prove enlightening and helpful to you in the constitutional considerations in which you obviously are going to become involved. Although the enclosed material should give you a clear outline of what I conceive to be your present standing constitutionally as a province, 1 would like to give you a brief summary of what I believe to be your present position. So far as separation. is concerned, rather than it being necessary to seek separation rights through a referendum, THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC IS ALREADY COMPLETELY CONSTITUTIONALLY SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF CANADA ! ! ! ! This is equally true of every other province in Canada and has been so since December 11, 1931, through the Statute of Westminster. HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED? In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit. As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully. I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province. The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated: 1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union. 2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union. 3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union. 4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union. 5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions. 6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony. The privilege of federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada. 7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as agent of the Imperial Parliament. 8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government. 9. The privilege of federating became realizable for the provinces of Canada, only through the enactment of the Statute of Westminster on December 11, 1931. Through this statute, the Imperial Parliament relinquished to the people of Canada their sovereign rights, and through them to their Provincial governments as their most direct agents. 10. Since December 11, 1931, the Provinces of Canada have not acted on their newly acquired status in the forming of a Federal Union, nor have the people of Canada ratified a constitution. Therefore, the original proposition, namely: that all power to govern in Canada resides at the moment, with the Provinces of Canada; and, that all power legally remains there until such time as the Provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution whereby they may delegate such powers as they wish to a central government of their own creation. In the meantime, Canada exists as ten political units without a political superior. Should you consider that there is merit in the information, which I have given you, I would be very happy to meet with you personally to discuss in greater depth the implications of the unprecedented constitutional circumstances prevailing in Canada. Yours for a better Canada, Walter F. Kuhl [Member of Parliament for Jasper-Edson, 1935-1949]

Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern httpsus02web.zoom.usj6945489985pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 Everything is a Lie; Nothing is True The word 'conspiracy' was created directly to debunk anyone who questioned the De-facto unlawful government and now we have Fact Checkers and the government created Ministry of Truth to control the narrative of their versions of facts and truth. De-facto unlawful Governments are now funding hundreds of millions of dollars to combat disinformation which means the net can no longer be reliable for accurate and occulted his-story. De-facto unlawful False Flags, the Agenda behind Mass Injections of poisons, the lies of the holocaust (Which was 100 percent a LIE how Rock n' Roll was created to repeal the Anti-Vietnam more movement and get the youth hooked on drugs. The War On....never ends and those that perpetuate all these events are using social media fact checkers to desperately control the narrative. Soon, the written and the oral words will be the only source for truth. Hence the need for me to put this one-of-a-kind compilation together to save and to share for future generations. 1. The Great Reset Again Hacking Humanity & The 4th Industrial Devolutions ALL Heads in the Cloud; Owned and Operated 2. Vaxxed to Spiritual Death 3. The Untold History Of Public EducationDumbed n’ Numbed by Design 4. Washington ACDC Inc. Roman Latin “Legalese” Law since 1066; Legally Owning Your Soul 5. Pedophilias Presidents, Tranny Pedowood & College Rape Farming 6. Words Are Swords 7. Bioengineered Transhumanistic Cloned Nano Pfoods 8. The Depopulation Agenda Was Set In Stone 9. Chemtrails ~ Crop Dusting and We Are the Bugs 10. DEW’d ~ Paradise Lost & The Grand Design 11. Mandela Mind Control 12. Rock n’ Roll Psyops 13. We Never Went to the Moon It Was A TV Show 14. It’s Flat and That’s That All the Ancients Were Wrong 15. Free Energy for All But Not for You 16. Nukes Never Existed Fukushima Fake Out 17. False Flags R US(a) Step by Step by Step…Works Everytime 18. Tartary; The Greatest Civilization To Be Erased From History 19. Endless Wars Never Ending 20. Endless War on the Brown Skins 21. Problem Reaction Solution

Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 Everything is a Lie; Nothing is True The word 'conspiracy' was created directly to debunk anyone who questioned the "De-facto unlawful government" and now we have "Fact Checkers" and the government created "Ministry of Truth" to control the narrative of their versions of "facts" and truth. De-facto unlawful Governments are now funding hundreds of millions of dollars to "combat disinformation" which means the "net" can no longer be reliable for accurate and occulted his-story. De-facto unlawful False Flags, the Agenda behind Mass Injections of poisons, the lies of the holocaust (Which was 100 percent a LIE" how Rock n' Roll was created to repeal the Anti-Vietnam more movement and get the youth hooked on drugs. The War On....never ends and those that perpetuate all these events are using social media fact checkers to desperately control the narrative. Soon, the written and the oral words will be the only source for truth. Hence the need for me to put this one-of-a-kind compilation together to save and to share for future generations. 1. The Great Reset Again Hacking Humanity & The 4th Industrial Devolutions ALL Heads in the Cloud; Owned and Operated 2. Vaxxed to Spiritual Death 3. The Untold History Of Public EducationDumbed n’ Numbed by Design 4. Washington AC/DC Inc. Roman Latin “Legalese” Law since 1066; Legally Owning Your Soul 5. Pedophilias Presidents, Tranny Pedowood & College Rape Farming 6. Words Are Swords 7. Bioengineered Transhumanistic Cloned Nano Pfoods 8. The Depopulation Agenda Was Set In Stone 9. Chemtrails ~ Crop Dusting and We Are the Bugs 10. DEW’d ~ Paradise Lost & The Grand Design 11. Mandela Mind Control 12. Rock n’ Roll Psyops 13. We Never Went to the Moon It Was A TV Show 14. It’s Flat and That’s That All the Ancients Were Wrong? 15. Free Energy for All But Not for You 16. Nukes Never Existed Fukushima Fake Out 17. False Flags R US(a) Step by Step by Step…Works Everytime 18. Tartary; The Greatest Civilization To Be Erased From History 19. Endless Wars Never Ending 20. Endless War on the Brown Skins 21. Problem/Reaction Solution

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

No elected representative at any level of government in Canada has a duty to ascertain or represent the majority views of their constituents. Here is the case law for 1990 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench. Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 Everything is a Lie; Nothing is True The word 'conspiracy' was created directly to debunk anyone who questioned the "De-facto unlawful government" and now we have "Fact Checkers" and the government created "Ministry of Truth" to control the narrative of their versions of "facts" and truth. De-facto unlawful Governments are now funding hundreds of millions of dollars to "combat disinformation" which means the "net" can no longer be reliable for accurate and occulted his-story. De-facto unlawful False Flags, the Agenda behind Mass Injections of poisons, the lies of the holocaust (Which was 100 percent a LIE" how Rock n' Roll was created to repeal the Anti-Vietnam more movement and get the youth hooked on drugs. The War On....never ends and those that perpetuate all these events are using social media fact checkers to desperately control the narrative. Soon, the written and the oral words will be the only source for truth. Hence the need for me to put this one-of-a-kind compilation together to save and to share for future generations. 1. The Great Reset Again Hacking Humanity & The 4th Industrial Devolutions ALL Heads in the Cloud; Owned and Operated 2. Vaxxed to Spiritual Death 3. The Untold History Of Public EducationDumbed n’ Numbed by Design 4. Washington AC/DC Inc. Roman Latin “Legalese” Law since 1066; Legally Owning Your Soul 5. Pedophilias Presidents, Tranny Pedowood & College Rape Farming 6. Words Are Swords 7. Bioengineered Transhumanistic Cloned Nano Pfoods 8. The Depopulation Agenda Was Set In Stone 9. Chemtrails ~ Crop Dusting and We Are the Bugs 10. DEW’d ~ Paradise Lost & The Grand Design 11. Mandela Mind Control 12. Rock n’ Roll Psyops 13. We Never Went to the Moon It Was A TV Show 14. It’s Flat and That’s That All the Ancients Were Wrong? 15. Free Energy for All But Not for You 16. Nukes Never Existed Fukushima Fake Out 17. False Flags R US(a) Step by Step by Step…Works Everytime 18. Tartary; The Greatest Civilization To Be Erased From History 19. Endless Wars Never Ending 20. Endless War on the Brown Skins 21. Problem/Reaction Solution

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

Never Have so Many Known so Little About so Much HO, CANADA ! by R. Rogers Smith, ( Chief Wapanatak ) https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2021/01/20/ho-canada-rogers-smith/ Canada is merely a geographical expression, not a political entity, says R. Rogers Smith, long-time battler for the right of Canadians to vote as Canadians, a right he claims they have never possessed. In his final chapter the author proposes a “ do-it-yourself ” method whereby the individual Canadian can assert this right. Writing often in a style, which has brought consternation to officialdom, R. Rogers Smith blends a scholar’s knowledge of Canada’s political history with a formidable array of facts, which cannot be disputed. Here you will learn why the author states that: the American Civil War cost Canada more than the combined losses of North and South; that the British North America Act of 1867 was designed to keep Canada in colonial status; that as regards the Governor-General, there has been no alteration in the constitution of Canada since the capitulation of Montreal in 1760; that there is not now, nor ever has been a confederation of the provinces of Canada; nor has provision ever been made for the Canadian to exercise his franchise by voting as a Canadian* Challenging controversial, plain spoken, HO, CANADA ! has not triggered any lively discussion but has prompted cover up action by the Canadian Government since its first publication, in 1965. Any and all information from Constitutional Conventions must be given to the original author by citing the source for original content http://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Ho_Canada_Rogers_Smith 00:00:00 begin 00:00:17 Contents 00:01:05 Prologue 00:11:48 Foreword 00:24:21 Introduction 00:25:40 Chapter 1 Search for the British North America Act of 1867 00:40:05 Chapter 2 The Birth of Great Britain 00:54:46 Chapter 3 The Citizen and the Flag 01:03:51 Chapter 4 The Constitution of the Government of England 01:20:30 Chapter 5 Rebellion of 1834-1837 01:31:50 Chapter 6 The British North America Act 1867 01:44:49 Chapter 7 Seven Tragic years 1860-1867 02:50:09 Chapter 8 The Statue of Westminster 03:15:16 Chapter 9 Correspondence on Income Tax 03:45:12 Chapter 10 Court Trials 1942-1947 03:51:57 Chapter 11 the Governor General 04:14:33 Chapter 12 The Constitution of Canada 04:40:33 Chapter 13 Do It Yourself We have been busy on some projects and wanted to send you a few videos on our next steps to end the fraud and mass murder!!! These videos we feel may help with some of the family or friends who comprehend something is wrong, but they are unable to connect the dots Bomb, Halifax, Montreal, and Quebec City - This is NO LAGHING MATTER https://rumble.com/v63h6oe-bomb-halifax-montreal-and-quebec-city-this-is-no-laghing-matter.html This is the latest Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html Full text of the Draft Constitution is in description – also at the end of the document. Video is some important ingo and also i educate about who the REAL Doufas FARCE IS known to may as Doug Force Time to Team up with the Men & Women who actually want To End THIS MASS Murder https://rumble.com/v6101en-time-to-team-up-with-the-men-and-women-who-actually-want-to-end-this-mass-m.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp the videos are powerful and all factual and all the Information may be found on this wide site https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Dennis Shaw and Reginald Angus Argue -*both ex-military ) Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html "Knowledge is Power. Shared Knowledge is Superpower. WHAT A WEEK! https://rumble.com/v605e0z-knowledge-is-power.-shared-knowledge-is-superpower.-what-a-week.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description. https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) From our Home Page you may watch Creating a Natural Law Republic https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Zoom daily 5 - 10 PM EST Daily https://zoom.us/s/6945489985 join and meet amazing Sovereigns dedicated to a Solution. We used Liberty as as a template - County/Town/ City/ Community. You would replace Liberty for your Community Name. This is a contract/constitution of an agreement between everyone in you community. This will protect each of you equally! There has never been a contract to protect man and woman as you have witnessed for years and lately with the fake planedemic. This will be a mutual agreement on how to govern yourselves. This is a powerful first step to restore law and return personal property. This alone must get you excited and committed to be part of this important historical event. Many will realize the importance of this and some may need to be educated or informed of this historical event! Under the current corrupt system you do not own your property, you have to ask permission to do anything on your property. Does this make sense. No of course NOT! Well its time to end this fraud! Time for us to take control of our lives, property and future! No one has any authority over You! Do we have to follow NATURAL LAWS? OF COURSE! BRING NO HARM! Well lets get started bringing this amazing information to everyone! We the people are the government- Time to end this fraud at our local level and by working together we will free ourselves! Control what happens on your property and community. Imagine you deciding where your money is spent . This is a 100 percent flip from the corrupt system the globalists created. Please review and lets all help each other comprehend what this means for a future. This will put an end the UN Agenda 21- UNDRIP- and all the bylaws they create to harm you. This also will return your Property rights Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) Preamble This is the first Natural Law Constitution created by: We the People, For the People, Of the People. The choice of Sovereignty emanates from man and woman and from no other source. In the past, tyrannical forces were exercised against peaceful men and women to subjugate them, and such naked aggression is a crime against humanity. We the Sovereigns wholeheartedly make our stand against any such tyranny. A lawful Constitution in alignment with Natural Law is the only solution. We are a group of Sovereigns who have prepared a draft Constitution for your review, consideration, and ratification by the Sovereigns at your local level, for the purpose of creating a Constitutional Convention. Self-sufficient Sovereigns at the local level shall have their own Constitution and will gain alliances as participation grows. The Sovereigns' Constitution nullifies all unlawful policies, unnatural laws, and unconstitutional documents regardless of their origin. The Constitution guarantees a Natural Law system to protect and secure our Unalienable Rights now and for future generations. PART ONE - Sovereign Republic The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) is Independent wherein the Sovereigns are the source of all decision making. Life, Liberty, Prosperity, Property, Land, Airspace, Water, all beds of navigable and non-navigable waters, and any resources are all Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights. The Republic of (Liberty) shall be comprised of branches responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns. Within those branches are hired employees who will implement and manage the directives and final decisions made by the Sovereigns. Sovereign funds are issued by the Treasury Branch, a monetary system that is owned by all the Sovereigns, based on a labor backed note and ensures a strong and self-reliant future. PART TWO - Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights The Unalienable Rights of the Sovereigns are protected by Natural Law. Unalienable Rights are inherent gifts from your Creator. A Sovereign cannot surrender, sell, or transfer their Unalienable Rights and they cannot under any circumstances be removed, abandoned, or taken by force, duress, threat, or coercion. All Sovereigns are equal within Natural Sovereign Law. PART THREE - Income Taxes All Sovereigns in the Republic of (Liberty) have the right to tax free income, no man or woman will pay tax on their labor. PART FOUR - Spiritual Beliefs The Republic of (Liberty) recognizes Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to Practice Spiritual Beliefs within Natural Law: Spiritual beliefs must not interfere, violate, harm, or infringe on others or their property. All Sovereigns must treat others with lawful and moral respect regardless of individual beliefs. All places of worship must be fully transparent and accessible to all Sovereigns and Administration. The Republic of (Liberty) Treasury must not fund any Spiritual beliefs or Ideologies. International funding is unlawful for any Spiritual Beliefs or Ideologies. PART FIVE - Free Speech This written Constitution is in accordance with Natural Law, upholding the right of all Sovereigns to freely express themselves in all situations without any form of direct or indirect threat or harm. PART SIX - Unalienable Right to Protect Yourself and Property It is the Sovereigns’ Unalienable Right to possess and bear arms for the use of survival and protection. Access to own and use ammunition must not be restricted. Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to engage in any lawful means required to protect life and property. The Right to Hunt, Trap, and Fish for sustenance cannot and must not be restricted. The Right to Self-Defence must require the Sovereign man or woman to only deploy as much force as necessary to neutralize or remove the threat. The Sovereigns have the lawful right to a well-regulated Militia which is essential for the security of a Free Republic. PART SEVEN - Treason The Republic of (Liberty) and its Sovereigns’ must not tolerate Treason in any form. Any attempt to harm or overthrow the Republic or undermine the Constitution of the Sovereigns’ is treasonous and therefore any perpetrator must face a Grand Jury. PART EIGHT - Sovereign Protections The following are the protective measures to guarantee Sovereigns are the final decision-makers within the Republic: Any revision to the Constitution must require one hundred percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Any amendment to an Article of the Constitution must require seventy-five percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Each Sovereign receives one ballot: yes or no. Any proposed revisions to the Constitution or amendments to the Articles must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) head office through Multi-Media for all Sovereigns to view. The Sovereigns’ Committees, Branches, and Administration must uphold and protect the Constitution without prejudice. Sovereigns’ Committees are directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns, entrusted with the implementation of plans, ideas, and the presentation of proposals and projects. Every branch of the Administration is directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns’ Committees and the Sovereigns alike. Employees for the Republic will be chosen by the Sovereigns’ Committees by selecting the most qualified candidate for a posted position. Each Sovereign receives one ballot; hire or not hire, fire or not fire. All outcomes of decisions must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) Administration office and through Multi-Media for all Sovereigns to view the results and to ensure transparency. - For further details on Parts One through Eight refer to the Articles. - For specific definitions of words on Parts One through Eight refer to the Glossary. REPUBLIC OF (LIBERTY) SOVEREIGN FOREVER

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

Part 1 https://rumble.com/v63u8d1-part-1-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.html Part 2 https://rumble.com/v63ruev-part-2-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.-links-to-documents-referenced-are-.html Part 3 https://rumble.com/v63pfma-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.part-3-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-link.html Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

Part 1 https://rumble.com/v63u8d1-part-1-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.html Part 2 https://rumble.com/v63ruev-part-2-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.-links-to-documents-referenced-are-.html Part 3 https://rumble.com/v63pfma-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.part-3-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-link.html We can’t defeat the existing system; we must build a better one instead Are only interested MUST be in inventing our own future — If we Do not take The Steps then we will have NO Future! “You never change something by fighting the existing reality,” “To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” The majority of Men and Women have either given in and joined in doing things the way everybody else did them or spent years bitterly trying to fight a system that didn’t show any appreciation for ideas offered. We agree twenty years ago; it fell on deaf ears. Ten years are also deaf years, but 2020 the plandemic has poured gasoline on the fire and has kick started millions to question the corrupt system! Our message everyday is they are de-facto , they are a fraud masquerading as a government!Fighting in their corrupt system, examples fighting 5 G, smart meters, by-laws has GOT all of US'S NO where! How many political parties have been created to Correct the injustice of their corrupt Oligarchy system to ONLY FAIL! Fighting to change existing reality, but rather building a new model entirely — when we were thinking more about the whole debate about whether to vote and about how the world can change (since I know it can’t happen through electoral politics). It helped us all to crystalize something in our mind that we already knew, but just hadn’t put into words. We can’t change political reality by fighting it. We can’t change the oppressive nature of coercive de-facto governments by voting for more of the lesser of the evil when they are the same politicians. We can’t bring about individual freedom by convincing everyone to want it. We can’t bring about the kinds of societies we want by trying to tear down the parts of the old ones that we don’t like. We can only defeat the coercive state by building a new model that is so desirable and so successful that Men and Women will clamor for it. Once one small local area takes the lead and accomplishes the task others will demand it! For those of us who are unhappy with the way the world is now — and particularly for those of us who ache to see how much of the world is mired in painful poverty and ignorance — the only solution is to build something new. The only solution is self-government is the key to ending their corrupt system. How did the Oligarchy create their system? Simple They created a contract, they called it a Constitution or a Charter, or the Magna Carta. These so-called frauds were accepted because of force and ignorance! “The most radical source of inequalities in human societies is the ‘ruler-ruled’ relationship,” Ostrom said. “The fashioning of a truly free world depends upon building the fundamental infrastructures that enable Menand Women to become self-governing.” If we’re going to have any hope of building a future where poverty is reduced and hundreds of millions of men and women can have an opportunity for a better life, we have to do more than just fight the existing system. We have to do more than just take money from successful people and hand it to the poor. And we have to do more than just help men and women in poverty through existing models of charity or ministry. We have to invent something brand new. At Constitutional Conventions we have educated and drafted a Sovereign Constitution! For you to look at and build upon and educate family and friends. Educate everyone WHY this is a game changer! You must want it more than anything. When you yourself realize what this offers you may move forward to educate others and the ball wil start rolling. The coercive state as we know it isn’t going to suddenly go away. Many of us know it’s going to collapse in time, but if we haven’t invented a better model — and shown that it works — something even worse than the existing state might take its place. Pioneering computer scientist Alan Kay famously said in 1971, “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” Most people don’t have the vision for how to invent much of anything. Fewer still have the practical ability or the patience or the determination. But what we need now are men and women who are willing to have a vision for a different societal model — even though nobody around us will understand how it can work — and then struggle for ways to plant that model and prove its viability. I don’t know exactly how we’re going to pull that off. I don’t know how long it will take. It might be our children or grandchildren who complete whatever we’re laying the foundation for. But I know we won’t make it happen by fighting the coercive state. We will only do it by inventing an alternative that makes men and women willingly give up the old model and insist that they live under a new system they choose to accept. Right now, is our opportunity to take the first step for our future. The time we spend fighting their system is wasted time. The answer is to be found in claiming rural areas, free cities or micro nations or seasteads or something we haven’t even thought of, the answer isn’t going to exist until we invent it and build it and show it to the world. We are still looking for men and women who are trying to figure this out and make it happen. The path is very fuzzy, but we have to find a way to make our way down that path. We believe the future of the world depends on it. We have been busy on some projects and wanted to send you a few videos on our next steps to end the fraud and mass murder!!! These videos we feel may help with some of the family or friends who comprehend something is wrong, but they are unable to connect the dotsBomb, Halifax, Montreal, and Quebec City - This is NO LAUGHING MATTERhttps://rumble.com/v63h6oe-bomb-halifax-montreal-and-quebec-city-this-is-no-laghing-matter.htmlThis is the latest Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.htmlFull text of the Draft Constitution is in description – also at the end of the document.Video is some important ingo and also i educate about who the REAL Doufas FARCE IS known to may as Doug ForceTime to Team up with the Men & Women who actually want To End THIS MASS Murderhttps://rumble.com/v6101en-time-to-team-up-with-the-men-and-women-who-actually-want-to-end-this-mass-m.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpthe videos are powerful and all factual and all the Information may be found on this wide sitehttps://constitutionalconventions.ca/Canada The Illusionhttps://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_uppDennis Shaw and Reginald Angus Argue -*both ex-military ) Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html"Knowledge is Power. Shared Knowledge is Superpower. WHAT A WEEK! https://rumble.com/v605e0z-knowledge-is-power.-shared-knowledge-is-superpower.-what-a-week.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpElliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description.https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpJoin in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Easternhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty)From our Home Page you may watch Creating a Natural Law Republic https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Zoom Tues -Thurs- Sunday - 7 PM AB Timehttps://zoom.us/s/6945489985join and meet amazing Sovereigns dedicated to a Solution.We used Liberty as a template - County/Town/ City/ Community. You would replace Liberty for your Community Name. This is a contract/constitution of an agreement between everyone in your community. This will protect each of you equally! There has never been a contract to protect man and woman as you have witnessed for years and lately with the fake planedemic. This will be a mutual agreement on how to govern yourselves. This is a powerful first step to restore law and return personal property. This alone must get you excited and committed to be part of this important historical event. Many will realize the importance of this and some may need to be educated or informed of this historical event! Under the current corrupt system you do not own your property, you have to ask permission to do anything on your property. Does this make sense? No of course NOT! Well its time to end this fraud! Time for us to take control of our lives, property and future! No one has any authority over You! Do we have to follow NATURAL LAWS? OF COURSE! BRING NO HARM! Well lets get started bringing this amazing information to everyone! We the people are the government- Time to end this fraud at our local level and by working together we will free ourselves! Control what happens on your property and community. Imagine you deciding where your money is spent . This is a 100 percent flip from the corrupt system the globalists created. Please review and lets all help each other comprehend what this means for the future. This will put an end to the UN Agenda 21- UNDRIP- and all the bylaws they create to harm you. This also will return your Property rights Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) Preamble This is the first Natural Law Constitution created by: We the People, For the People, Of the People. The choice of Sovereignty emanates from man and woman and from no other source. In the past, tyrannical forces were exercised against peaceful men and women to subjugate them, and such naked aggression is a crime against humanity. We the Sovereigns wholeheartedly make our stand against any such tyranny. A lawful Constitution in alignment with Natural Law is the only solution. We are a group of Sovereigns who have prepared a draft Constitution for your review, consideration, and ratification by the Sovereigns at your local level, for the purpose of creating a Constitutional Convention. Self-sufficient Sovereigns at the local level shall have their own Constitution and will gain alliances as participation grows. The Sovereigns' Constitution nullifies all unlawful policies, unnatural laws, and unconstitutional documents regardless of their origin. The Constitution guarantees a Natural Law system to protect and secure our Unalienable Rights now and for future generations. PART ONE - Sovereign Republic The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) is Independent wherein the Sovereigns are the source of all decision making. Life, Liberty, Prosperity, Property, Land, Airspace, Water, all beds of navigable and non-navigable waters, and any resources are all Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights. The Republic of (Liberty) shall be composed of branches responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns. Within those branches are hired employees who will implement and manage the directives and final decisions made by the Sovereigns. Sovereign funds are issued by the Treasury Branch, a monetary system that is owned by all the Sovereigns, based on a labor backed note and ensures a strong and self-reliant future. PART TWO - Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights The Unalienable Rights of the Sovereigns are protected by Natural Law. Unalienable Rights are inherent gifts from your Creator. A Sovereign cannot surrender, sell, or transfer their Unalienable Rights and they cannot under any circumstances be removed, abandoned, or taken by force, duress, threat, or coercion. All Sovereigns are equal within Natural Sovereign Law. PART THREE - Income Taxes All Sovereigns in the Republic of (Liberty) have the right to tax free income, no man or woman will pay tax on their labor. PART FOUR - Spiritual Beliefs The Republic of (Liberty) recognizes Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to Practice Spiritual Beliefs within Natural Law: Spiritual beliefs must not interfere, violate, harm, or infringe on others or their property. All Sovereigns must treat others with lawful and moral respect regardless of individual beliefs. All places of worship must be fully transparent and accessible to all Sovereigns and Administration. The Republic of (Liberty) Treasury must not fund any Spiritual beliefs or Ideologies. International funding is unlawful for any Spiritual Beliefs or Ideologies. PART FIVE - Free Speech This written Constitution is in accordance with Natural Law, upholding the right of all Sovereigns to freely express themselves in all situations without any form of direct or indirect threat or harm. PART SIX - Unalienable Right to Protect Yourself and Property It is the Sovereigns’ Unalienable Right to possess and bear arms for the use of survival and protection. Access to own and use ammunition must not be restricted. Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to engage in any lawful means required to protect life and property. The Right to Hunt, Trap, and Fish for sustenance cannot and must not be restricted. The Right to Self-Defence must require the Sovereign man or woman to only deploy as much force as necessary to neutralize or remove the threat. The Sovereigns have the lawful right to a well-regulated Militia which is essential for the security of a Free Republic. PART SEVEN - Treason The Republic of (Liberty) and its Sovereigns’ must not tolerate Treason in any form. Any attempt to harm or overthrow the Republic or undermine the Constitution of the Sovereigns’ is treasonous and therefore any perpetrator must face a Grand Jury. PART EIGHT - Sovereign Protections The following are the protective measures to guarantee Sovereigns are the final decision-makers within the Republic: Any revision to the Constitution must require one hundred percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Any amendment to an Article of the Constitution must require seventy-five percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Each Sovereign receives one ballot: yes or no. Any proposed revisions to the Constitution or amendments to the Articles must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) head office through Multimedia for all Sovereigns to view. The Sovereigns’ Committees, Branches, and Administration must uphold and protect the Constitution without prejudice. Sovereigns’ Committees are directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns, entrusted with the implementation of plans, ideas, and the presentation of proposals and projects. Every branch of the Administration is directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns’ Committees and the Sovereigns alike. Employees for the Republic will be chosen by the Sovereigns’ Committees by selecting the most qualified candidate for a posted position. Each Sovereign receives one ballot; hire or not hire, fire or not fire. All outcomes of decisions must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) Administration office and through Multimedia for all Sovereigns to view the results and to ensure transparency. - For further details on Parts One through Eight refer to the Articles. - For specific definitions of words on Parts One through Eight refer to the Glossary. REPUBLIC OF (LIBERTY) SOVEREIGN FOREVER

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Part 1 https://rumble.com/v63u8d1-part-1-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.html Part 2 https://rumble.com/v63ruev-part-2-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.-links-to-documents-referenced-are-.html Part 3 https://rumble.com/v63pfma-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.part-3-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-link.html We can’t defeat the existing system; we must build a better one instead Are you interested in inventing your own future — If you're interested then you are on the right path. Let's build our future with a new contract. “You never change something by fighting the existing reality,” “To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” The majority of Men and Women have either given in and joined in doing things the way everybody else did them or spent years bitterly trying to fight a system that didn’t show any appreciation for ideas offered. Twenty years ago; it fell on deaf ears. Ten years ago it also fell on deaf ears. 2020 the plandemic has ignited a fire in millions to question the corrupt system! 2024 the existing system has literally poured gasoline on the fire. This fire has ignited Tens of millions to investigate the system! To build a new system we must sell the benefits of what this really means! Our message everyday is they are de-facto , they are a fraud masquerading as a government! Fighting in their corrupt system, examples fighting 5 G, smart meters, by-laws has GOT all of US'S NO where! How many political parties have been created to Correct the injustice of their corrupt Oligarchy system to ONLY FAIL! Fighting to change existing reality, but rather building a new model entirely — when we were thinking more about the whole debate about whether to vote and about how the world can change (since I know it can’t happen through electoral politics). It helped us all to crystalize something in our mind that we already knew, but just hadn’t put into words. We can’t change political reality by fighting it. We can’t change the oppressive nature of coercive de-facto governments by voting for more of the lesser of the evil when they are the same politicians. We can’t bring about individual freedom by convincing everyone to want it. We can’t bring about the kinds of societies we want by trying to tear down the parts of the old ones that we don’t like. We can only defeat the coercive state by building a new model that is so desirable and so successful that Men and Women will clamor for it. Once one small local area takes the lead and accomplishes the task others will demand it! For those of us who are unhappy with the way the world is now — and particularly for those of us who ache to see how much of the world is mired in painful poverty and ignorance — the only solution is to build something new. The only solution is self-government is the key to ending their corrupt system. How did the Oligarchy create their system? Simple They created a contract, they called it a Constitution or a Charter, or the Magna Carta. These so-called frauds were accepted because of force and ignorance! “The most radical source of inequalities in human societies is the ‘ruler-ruled’ relationship,” Ostrom said. “The fashioning of a truly free world depends upon building the fundamental infrastructures that enable Menand Women to become self-governing.” If we’re going to have any hope of building a future where poverty is reduced and hundreds of millions of men and women can have an opportunity for a better life, we have to do more than just fight the existing system. We have to do more than just take money from successful people and hand it to the poor. And we have to do more than just help men and women in poverty through existing models of charity or ministry. We have to invent something brand new. At Constitutional Conventions we have educated and drafted a Sovereign Constitution! For you to look at and build upon and educate family and friends. Educate everyone WHY this is a game changer! You must want it more than anything. When you yourself realize what this offers you may move forward to educate others and the ball will start rolling. The coercive state as we know it isn’t going to suddenly go away. Many of us know it’s going to collapse in time, but if we haven’t invented a better model — and shown that it works — something even worse than the existing state might take its place. Pioneering computer scientist Alan Kay famously said in 1971, “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” Most people don’t have the vision for how to invent much of anything. Fewer still have the practical ability or the patience or the determination. But what we need now are men and women who are willing to have a vision for a different societal model — even though nobody around us will understand how it can work — and then struggle for ways to plant that model and prove its viability. I don’t know exactly how we’re going to pull that off. I don’t know how long it will take. It might be our children or grandchildren who complete whatever we’re laying the foundation for. But I know we won’t make it happen by fighting the coercive state. We will only do it by inventing an alternative that makes men and women willingly give up the old model and insist that they live under a new system they choose to accept. Right now, is our opportunity to take the first step for our future. The time we spend fighting their system is wasted time. The answer is to be found in claiming rural areas, free cities or micro nations or seasteads or something we haven’t even thought of, the answer isn’t going to exist until we invent it and build it and show it to the world. We are still looking for men and women who are trying to figure this out and make it happen. The path is very fuzzy, but we have to find a way to make our way down that path. We believe the future of the world depends on it. We have been busy on some projects and wanted to send you a few videos on our next steps to end the fraud and mass murder!!! These videos we feel may help with some of the family or friends who comprehend something is wrong, but they are unable to connect the dotsBomb, Halifax, Montreal, and Quebec City - This is NO LAUGHING MATTERhttps://rumble.com/v63h6oe-bomb-halifax-montreal-and-quebec-city-this-is-no-laghing-matter.htmlThis is the latest Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.htmlFull text of the Draft Constitution is in description – also at the end of the document.Video is some important ingo and also i educate about who the REAL Doufas FARCE IS known to may as Doug ForceTime to Team up with the Men & Women who actually want To End THIS MASS Murderhttps://rumble.com/v6101en-time-to-team-up-with-the-men-and-women-who-actually-want-to-end-this-mass-m.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpthe videos are powerful and all factual and all the Information may be found on this wide sitehttps://constitutionalconventions.ca/Canada The Illusionhttps://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_uppDennis Shaw and Reginald Angus Argue -*both ex-military ) Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html"Knowledge is Power. Shared Knowledge is Superpower. WHAT A WEEK! https://rumble.com/v605e0z-knowledge-is-power.-shared-knowledge-is-superpower.-what-a-week.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpElliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description.https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucpJoin in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Easternhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty)From our Home Page you may watch Creating a Natural Law Republic https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ Zoom Tues -Thurs- Sunday - 7 PM AB Timehttps://zoom.us/s/6945489985join and meet amazing Sovereigns dedicated to a Solution.We used Liberty as a template - County/Town/ City/ Community. You would replace Liberty for your Community Name. This is a contract/constitution of an agreement between everyone in your community. This will protect each of you equally! There has never been a contract to protect man and woman as you have witnessed for years and lately with the fake planedemic. This will be a mutual agreement on how to govern yourselves. This is a powerful first step to restore law and return personal property. This alone must get you excited and committed to be part of this important historical event. Many will realize the importance of this and some may need to be educated or informed of this historical event! Under the current corrupt system you do not own your property, you have to ask permission to do anything on your property. Does this make sense? No of course NOT! Well its time to end this fraud! Time for us to take control of our lives, property and future! No one has any authority over You! Do we have to follow NATURAL LAWS? OF COURSE! BRING NO HARM! Well lets get started bringing this amazing information to everyone! We the people are the government- Time to end this fraud at our local level and by working together we will free ourselves! Control what happens on your property and community. Imagine you deciding where your money is spent . This is a 100 percent flip from the corrupt system the globalists created. Please review and lets all help each other comprehend what this means for the future. This will put an end to the UN Agenda 21- UNDRIP- and all the bylaws they create to harm you. This also will return your Property rights Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) Preamble This is the first Natural Law Constitution created by: We the People, For the People, Of the People. The choice of Sovereignty emanates from man and woman and from no other source. In the past, tyrannical forces were exercised against peaceful men and women to subjugate them, and such naked aggression is a crime against humanity. We the Sovereigns wholeheartedly make our stand against any such tyranny. A lawful Constitution in alignment with Natural Law is the only solution. We are a group of Sovereigns who have prepared a draft Constitution for your review, consideration, and ratification by the Sovereigns at your local level, for the purpose of creating a Constitutional Convention. Self-sufficient Sovereigns at the local level shall have their own Constitution and will gain alliances as participation grows. The Sovereigns' Constitution nullifies all unlawful policies, unnatural laws, and unconstitutional documents regardless of their origin. The Constitution guarantees a Natural Law system to protect and secure our Unalienable Rights now and for future generations. PART ONE - Sovereign Republic The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) is Independent wherein the Sovereigns are the source of all decision making. Life, Liberty, Prosperity, Property, Land, Airspace, Water, all beds of navigable and non-navigable waters, and any resources are all Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights. The Republic of (Liberty) shall be composed of branches responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns. Within those branches are hired employees who will implement and manage the directives and final decisions made by the Sovereigns. Sovereign funds are issued by the Treasury Branch, a monetary system that is owned by all the Sovereigns, based on a labor backed note and ensures a strong and self-reliant future. PART TWO - Sovereigns’ Unalienable Rights The Unalienable Rights of the Sovereigns are protected by Natural Law. Unalienable Rights are inherent gifts from your Creator. A Sovereign cannot surrender, sell, or transfer their Unalienable Rights and they cannot under any circumstances be removed, abandoned, or taken by force, duress, threat, or coercion. All Sovereigns are equal within Natural Sovereign Law. PART THREE - Income Taxes All Sovereigns in the Republic of (Liberty) have the right to tax free income, no man or woman will pay tax on their labor. PART FOUR - Spiritual Beliefs The Republic of (Liberty) recognizes Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to Practice Spiritual Beliefs within Natural Law: Spiritual beliefs must not interfere, violate, harm, or infringe on others or their property. All Sovereigns must treat others with lawful and moral respect regardless of individual beliefs. All places of worship must be fully transparent and accessible to all Sovereigns and Administration. The Republic of (Liberty) Treasury must not fund any Spiritual beliefs or Ideologies. International funding is unlawful for any Spiritual Beliefs or Ideologies. PART FIVE - Free Speech This written Constitution is in accordance with Natural Law, upholding the right of all Sovereigns to freely express themselves in all situations without any form of direct or indirect threat or harm. PART SIX - Unalienable Right to Protect Yourself and Property It is the Sovereigns’ Unalienable Right to possess and bear arms for the use of survival and protection. Access to own and use ammunition must not be restricted. Sovereigns have the Unalienable Right to engage in any lawful means required to protect life and property. The Right to Hunt, Trap, and Fish for sustenance cannot and must not be restricted. The Right to Self-Defence must require the Sovereign man or woman to only deploy as much force as necessary to neutralize or remove the threat. The Sovereigns have the lawful right to a well-regulated Militia which is essential for the security of a Free Republic. PART SEVEN - Treason The Republic of (Liberty) and its Sovereigns’ must not tolerate Treason in any form. Any attempt to harm or overthrow the Republic or undermine the Constitution of the Sovereigns’ is treasonous and therefore any perpetrator must face a Grand Jury. PART EIGHT - Sovereign Protections The following are the protective measures to guarantee Sovereigns are the final decision-makers within the Republic: Any revision to the Constitution must require one hundred percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Any amendment to an Article of the Constitution must require seventy-five percent of the voting Sovereigns’ votes. Each Sovereign receives one ballot: yes or no. Any proposed revisions to the Constitution or amendments to the Articles must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) head office through Multimedia for all Sovereigns to view. The Sovereigns’ Committees, Branches, and Administration must uphold and protect the Constitution without prejudice. Sovereigns’ Committees are directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns, entrusted with the implementation of plans, ideas, and the presentation of proposals and projects. Every branch of the Administration is directly responsible and accountable to the Sovereigns’ Committees and the Sovereigns alike. Employees for the Republic will be chosen by the Sovereigns’ Committees by selecting the most qualified candidate for a posted position. Each Sovereign receives one ballot; hire or not hire, fire or not fire. All outcomes of decisions must be posted at the Republic of (Liberty) Administration office and through Multimedia for all Sovereigns to view the results and to ensure transparency. - For further details on Parts One through Eight refer to the Articles. - For specific definitions of words on Parts One through Eight refer to the Glossary. REPUBLIC OF (LIBERTY) SOVEREIGN FOREVER

Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Part 1 https://rumble.com/v63u8d1-part-1-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.html Part 2 https://rumble.com/v63ruev-part-2-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.-links-to-documents-referenced-are-.html Part 3 https://rumble.com/v63pfma-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.part-3-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-link.html Part 4 https://rumble.com/v63uepd-part-4-we-need-to-talk-about-canada-inc.html Join The Zoom 7 PM Daily https://us02web.zoom.us/s/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09#success Finally, the Solution We have all been Working For! (Make it go Viral) What if you could build your own Nation? Well, we have great news. We always had the Lawful Right To create a Nation. Let’s start here. We're going to look at some articles In the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights So, this brings us all up to where we want to start talking about some ideas that we have been educating at Constitutional Conventions have been educating since 1980. We like this one. Because itis a bit more specific. And so, if we look at what you got to understand about laws, we talked about jurisdiction. And jurisdictions go down from international to local. And so international law is, as far as the matrix is concerned, international law is at the top of the heap. There are things above that, no question. And I don't know what all of them are. This stuff can get esoteric. And it can actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together, but I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective. This document, the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Has been signed on by every Western nation. That includes the United States, that's Canada, like every Western European country. Most of the major countries in the world. Have signed on to this. Now, what that means is that is the highest law in the land because it's a treaty. So, you have treaties, then you have federal laws, state laws and so on and so forth. Treaties are the most superior laws. So, if a country is in violation of a treaty. That country can be held in an international court. Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other, and they're all great. That's not the case at all. My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court. Judges are corrupt. They're mostly Freemasons. There are all kinds of stuff to it, but it's to just win in the paperwork and take it to them and call them on it. I'm not going to get into too many specific, I don't want to get into any specific remedies. In this discussion tonight. Remedy is so powerful that it doesn’t serve most people because most people won't benefit from it any ways. But if we screw these things up, they can change it for us because they can change the laws. So, I won't get into specific remedies, but I'm going to talk about things in abroad enough way that I think it'll be obvious. Where things can go with this. But so, we look at article one in the nest there. And again, this is of the ICCPR.(the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.) This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada. Okay. And they both signed up for this. So, Article 1 says. And article1 is article 1for one reason, because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix okay. Legal language, words are very specific. All people have the right of self-determination, period. That sentence alone is significantly powerful. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. Period. That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy is that it's almost all right there. Yes, it gets more specific, and we'll look at some other articles. But in this article alone, we have the right to self-determination. What do you think 1776was?By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/declaration#:~:text=By%20issuing%20the%20Declaration%20of,colonists'%20motivations%20for%20seeking%20independence. That was exactly self-determination. Now, the ICCPR wasn't written then. The ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States. But in 1776, what is essentially was happening was people In the United States of America, not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, D.C, but in the land of the many states of America. They Said, we've had enough with these British Parasites controlling our lives, our resources. We want to start our own bank and print our own money. Where we are going to go with a lot of this stuff, because we're going to look at somethings that our teams have compiled and written and I don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR, but we're going to look at things that we have written base on what's out there and newer things. But the fact that we have the right to self-determination. This is the Key that opens the door and slams the door on them!I It Says everything you need to know. Okay, we could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation but that alone says that we have the right, and you'll notice this says all people have the right All people are very specific. It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens. It's all people, meaning all the people in a geographical area. You know, I'm very set up as far as, you know, the shit hitting the fan, if you will. But my context becomes a little different out here because What I need out here is resources with people. We're lacking that in a rural area, whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that, but it's also one of these double-edged swords where people and many people can be your greatest resource, or they can be your greatest liability. You know, it won't be a shocker to say it, but if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia, you know, you're not as good off as crime being done to you ascertain other places in the world are maybe. Like in Alberta, for example, people can be your biggest asset, but they can also be your biggest liability. So, one thing I think needs to happen with people just like what they did in 1776 or attempted to. We need to separate ourselves from the state through self-determination. Through people coming together. And basically, saying Instead of trying to change Let's say in imagining we're America trying to separate from the brits is… Is… instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons. They just separated by a declaration of independence and saying, we're done. Constitutional Conventions have been educating this for 30 plus years and now more are learningfrom their important Message. Constitutional Conventions has drafted a declaration and has drafted a constitution – also has created drafts for interim administration and Natural Law grand jury of 12 We can essentially do the same thing. There's no reason why we People Cannot do exactly the same plan. People livein geographical regions. So, a small group of men/women in an area have the lawful right to create whatever they want as the existing system is de-facto, fraud, and has NO Authority. If you're in North America, we have a ton of space, despite the number of migrants being dumped into this landmass known as North America. In both countries, Canada, and the US, we still have a ton of space. People can move. In Canada, United States, you still have the freedom to move around. And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom for a while, but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways. But people can move. So, with that, We think a big solution for people is to start getting to geographical regions and writing. A declaration of Independence and a constitution draft with a Bill of Rights. Which Constitutional Conventions have drafted for those to view. And the reason we are not suggesting that we do this through elections is that I think you can all see and agree it has been no more than fraud from its inception. The establishment has complete control!!! They have complete control of Trump and his administration. What's coming down through the rhetoric. Of Trump and RFK and Maha. And then there's that latest image where they're all eating at McDonald's like, which to me looks like absolute blatant gaslighting. This deception is in the bag for the establishment and they're just going to swing it back to the right. So, we came out of many years of woke liberal neoliberalism stuff. Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy and it won't make any difference. And then we're going to go to right wing (same in Canada with Daniel Smith or Pierre) neoconservatism with his just warmongering and everybody, and they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way because. These people have control of everything. If you have to, you have to realize that you have to realize we are the ones that we've been waiting for, that we are the creations of the creator. And we are the ones that create. And all this establishment is due to make a new world order All they have done is get us to do it. That's how their scam works. They get us to do the work. And we do the work through tacit agreement, which means We didn't reply to the letter that said, if you don't agree, if you don't reply within 21 days. You're going to accept. Or you accepted it in some way or another we noticed. In public notice, we never responded. We never cared. We basically got to the place where we are. Because people stopped caring because the corporate establishment made the world so comfortable for us that we've traded all of our rights and responsibilities for privileges and benefits through conveniences. And we're out of state now, and this is another reason why we know politics is hopeless and rhetorical. You might think that, you know, there's going to be No changes. But then you go to Walmart. Okay. And you look at the people there. And you go, what the hell. This is insane. And you could go to any Walmart anywhere and yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia. A lot different. By and large, what you find is that the common man, the common individual i in our society is out of shape, unhealthy. Can't even process thoughts and go along with everything the establishment wants them to do. And you might be able to sway some of them here and there, but with great cost. With great cost to your reputation, with great cost to your economic well-being like we saw during the COVID scam, sticking your neck out to wake up the masses isn't really that lucrative when you look at time for return. It's return on investment economically is very poor. And so, What I say is… CRAP. You're not going to convince these people of anything. What you're better off doing is getting together with other like-minded people who are hardcore, who have the same values as you and are, willing to step forward And form some kind of economic relationship with you. And I think This is where the rubber must meet the road if people have to start coming together geographically. And that's a tough thing to do because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that. If we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hellholes. We will be burnt at the stake. Now, all you must do is look at history to see how that goes. Is that in every… communist or authoritarian rise to power the people that fled the cities did better than the others. Now people say, oh, what about the kulak sand all that? Yeah, they did go around and collect farms and all that. http://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheWaragainsttheKulaks.php But those are even in the farming areas. I'm talking about people who need to move to rural areas, get out of all these types of areas. Where there's large scale agriculture and such. But people that were outside of it fared better. And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas and start Having economic relationships with individuals, they can't form an economy of any scale because if you live in an apartment. And you don't have any reason to know your neighbors except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his sugar or phone or what ever to make some gravy. Or some thing, you know what I mean? You have no reason to know them. Whereas when you live in a rural area. You will get to know the people who live closest to you very well. Because yo have a reason to. If you're in a cold climate, sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below. That's what it is up here. You might trade vegetables or eggs with them. You might help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud. There are hundreds of reasons why the rural areas are more productive! That you'll get to know people who live around you in rural areas. And that's important. Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another. We can't really coexist. We're just going to be soloed out in these Twitter spaces. And these spaces are good, right? Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying let's throw the baby out with the bathwater. But you need to have reasons to get together with like-minded people. And we must all start to educate about why moving to geographically places is the key. Different takes on what that might look like, but we agree almost inevitably that there's going to be a break at some point, that people are going to move away, and as they do, they're going to need to figure out. How they collectivize and normalize this new world outside of this big machine. What might serve as a framework for what they more described, which was kind of the physical manifestation of what that division might look like. Totally. But even in U.S. History we've seen balkanization, right? We've seen groups try to break away. It's happened many times. Even in Canada, there's history with that, with the Russian Dukeabors who were Russian dissidents who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada and were granted quarter sections by the government. And they became just these sorts(agrarians)relating to the ownership and use of land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society or economy that is concerned with agriculture. Then eventually they didn't want the government o abuse them anymore. They did NOT want their kids to be forced into public schools because they were indoctrinating them with bullshit. And they rounded these people up and put them in concentration camps. Not so much concentration, but they rounded up the kids and put them in residential schools and such. But you don't hear about that because they were white. And so, it doesn't suit the political narrative they are Pushing to suck in the Natives (all born here are Native to the Land)with the UNDRIP narrative. But it was essentially the same thing where people were just staking a claim. And if you look at some of their history, they have all these legal charters they wrote that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff. We have seen these many times. And so, what we are going to propose here. This has been done before. People do these things because everything gets to a breaking point Where you must do it, right? You have to um eventually say enough is enough because if we keep playing their game, it's over so What I want to talk about now is three things that WE think are needed There's no reason any of us can't do this. All that is required is people coming together and promoting all the hard work Constitutional Conventions Teams have created. The hard work has been completed now it’s time to make the information go viral.! A. Writing a Constitution Draft to view. B. Researching the Declaration, they have created to view. C. Recruiting alternate media, live streamers to finally start sending the Solution rather than the regurgitated distraction. D. If these so called truther groups or association will not educate their followers then we know what side they are on, E. Be a clear message, they are part of the controlled opposition. F. If groups push Citizens, indigenous, UNDRIP, Treaties, Charter, Bill of rights, Act, Statues, they are not educated and are doing grave harm. Constitution of The Sovereigns' https://rumble.com/v29il48-constitution-of-the-sovereign.html We can do the same thing but set up this administration, so everyone is protected. And once it's agreed upon by a bunch of people and people in a geographical location, they now have created their own nation. The benefits of this are as follows: A. Land ownership B. No Taxes extortion C. No Income tax extortion D. All the resources belong to the people in the newly formed Nation. E. Property Protection These above are just a few of the benefits and there are numerous more we may add later. That's all the government is supposed to be. What some people believe is or call government as created by a small group of people who got together Over the last hundreds, if not thousands of years and said, hey, guys, what to do to rule the world? Let's get together and make it happen! And that's all they've done. So, there's no reason to even accept this fraud! The rest of us can't do it. The problem is, the average Walmart shopper. That's the problem. And so that's why I say. Some level of regional balkanization is the only way forward if you're going to say, let’s get a county such as Yellowhead County or if need be even go to a smaller geographical area such as Wildwood, Hansville or Peers. You do not have to get the entire land mass of what we will call Alberta the entire state together on this, no way it's going to happen. If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri together on this, no way it's going to happen. And rural is very different from urban, suburban, and peri-urban. When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world You can correlate tyranny to how people are placed by understanding this concept. The more concrete that you're surrounded by, the more tyranny you're surrounded by simply because the more concrete, the more roads, the more buildings, the more infrastructure, the more sewer services, utilities, and things like that that need to be brought in. In volve money. And there is a saying that I have in law is that where the money flows, the policy goes. So, anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town can attest to this just by observation. Think about the amount of bureaucracy in places like Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary city Compared to Peers, Niton Junction, Wildwood and numerous other locations that can move to create their own Nation. Need to remove the indoctrination of Canada, Alberta, or municipality, and replace it with hard facts to proceed forward. The smaller the town the better. It's so obviously observable and so what that means is that if you can get away from the concrete, which is where all the people are, most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems because now you have the variable that's outside of your control, which is the socioeconomics of a place Social and economic factors include factors such as income, education, employment, community safety and social support. The choices that are available in a community are impacted by social and economic factors. Or the crime rates of a place or whatever, you can get away from them. So, a big-time problem is solved when you don't have to worry about your car getting broken in to every night or having something stolen off your property or having your kids bike stolen from your front yard. It really changes the way you live. But out here, I can do that. I don't have to lock my doors. I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city. So that alone is important. And then when you start talking about law. There's a whole other level to it. So, what we need… is we have to look at three documents. a. Declaration of Independence - b. Constitution – c. We can all write our laws. But this is not complete. So, the caveat here is this is not complete. We can all write our laws. We don't have to ask permission. We can all start by doing this ourselves. Canada The Illusion https://rumble.com/v60o56t-canada-the-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_upp Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Elliot McDavid talks FACTs - Canada is an Illusion - Videos are in Description https://rumble.com/v637sjh-elliot-mcdavid-talks-facts-canada-is-an-illusion-video-are-in-description.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Join in Tues, Thursday Sunday 7 Alberta 9 Eastern https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09

King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers".

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 CANADA the ILLUSION -Hudson Bay Company Land Grab to create the Corporation of: Canada

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 The Hudson Bay Company Charter is the true enemy and continues this present day hidden To comprehend how and why all the men and women have No Property will be educated in this important video. Please share so we may all become informed to rectify these injustice. Thank You Knowledge is Power - Dallas hills We will start here and go deep into the past to connect all the dots to where this all started. From their we will be able to end the illusion once and for all. Lets get started Pierre- Andre Pare believes that owning a house and owning a car are privileges in Quebec and that the State should be able to put an end to these.. "All is privilege conceded by the State: your car, your house, your profession, in short your life; and what the state gives (you), it can take back (from you) if you’re not a docile taxpayer." Pierre-André Paré, former Deputy Minister at the Quebec Department of Revenue before a commission of the National Assembly of Quebec. Published byLe Devoir, April 6, 1996.) [Council Order 863-96, July 10, 1996 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "The discretion of a judge is said to be the law of tyrants. It is always unknown. It is different in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. In the best, it is sometimes caprice. In the worst, it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature is liable." Justice Charles Pratt, Lord Camden (1714-1794) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT ONE (THE ROYAL CHARTER) Smoke and mirrors and Rupert's Land Act appears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called "The Governor and Company Of Adventurers of England Trading in the Hudson Bay". It would later be called the Hudson Bay Company or HBC. The charter comprised 40% of what is now the Canadian landmass, and included much of what is currently the U.S. states of Minnesota and North Dakota. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Charles II King of England, (Scotland, France, and Ireland and Defender of the Faith) The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670. King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The deed was in the name of the monarch, fully and forever, for all heirs in perpetual succession. It can never be revoked. Rupert held the rights to "sole trade and commerce" of this enormous land. King Charles II called his cousin and the 17 associates the "true and absolute Lords and Proprietors" of what would now be referred to as Rupert's Land. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Never mind the millions of people whose ancestor's, successors and heirs, already inhabited the land, the Native People, plus the Native settlers. (Being born in a specific location on the land, makes you Native to the land (the BNA Act and the Indian Act were created by the de-facto Canada corporation which has complete control over all the land- and all men and women. Chief and band councils were created by the Corporation of Canada within the Indian Act, which as you may Not Know? This video will give you information to do your own research. Educate yourself so we may take the steps to correct this serious injustice that effects us all. This Indian Act is a piece of Canadian legislation, which is why Native men and women are tenants and we can never own the land that was stolen from us through their deception. As it is now, The King and Queens and their heirs own all the land. ,all of whom would come to despise and loathe the ruthless Hudson Bay Company. The charter's partners ran into their forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those on the outside, who hated this company. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the fur trade, forestry, minerals, the waterways, and everything else. It was a full-on monopoly, plus, they could make their own laws and enforce them. And all members of the HBC had to take oaths back to the King or Queen, as they still do today. No one knows what the actual deal was between King Charles and Prince Rupert, and we are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told that in exchange for the deed, the Hudson Bay Company owed the British Royals two beaver pelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might have meant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaver pelts, and two elk heads might have been a way of saying this business" fleeces them, decapitates them, and mounts their heads like trophies". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Hudson Bay Company ran like this for 200 years. From its first beginnings in North America, the HBC pulled a large Proportion of men and women into the web of capitalist economy. Being predominantly a trading company, the HBC was dependent on labour to fill its ships headed to European markets. Fur trappers were predominantly originals or Métis (but also French, Scottish and others), and worked for the HBC not as partners but as exploited workers. With 200 years of exploitation of resources they depleted everything in their path and financially were no longer a viable company on its own. After all the struggle and competition, it was obvious that the fur trade would soon come to an end. One of the main reasons of the end of the fur trade was that the beavers' and other animals' populations were decreasing due to the overwhelming harvesting depleting the population of a species more quickly than it can reproduce and recover. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Under severe economic pressure brought about by their fierce competition, the Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company. amalgamated in 1821, and King Charles II of England ordered Hudson's Bay Company to create colonies. The number of beavers and river otters killed during the fur trade was devastating for the animals' North American populations. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, river and water management and other vital needs were also ravaged, leading to ecological destruction, significant environmental change, and even drought in certain areas. Following this degradation, both the river otter and beaver populations in North America would continue to decline, which brought great hardship for the original and settlers. Originals, Metis and settlers population were devastated by the fur trade and many hardships and deaths occurred. Still to this day many are unaware that smallpox was used a biological warfare, that was deliberately introduced to exterminate millions. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon Once introduced into North America, smallpox spread everywhere. Intentionally to kill people! Now here is some alarming information: Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population and was instrumental in the fall of the empires of the Aztecs and the Incas. Similarly, on the eastern coast of North America, smallpox was planned as a biological weapon and led to a decline of millions of originals, Metis and settler native population. The devastating effects of smallpox also gave rise to one of the first examples of biological warfare. During the French-Indian War (1754–1767), Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, suggested the deliberate use of smallpox to diminish the American Indian population hostile to the British. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by S Riedel · 2005 · Cited by 1350 — Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it was actually a for-profit corporation, called the Hudson Bay Company. Everything came down to paying fees and penalties, using the corporate court system to uphold laws and make money. Everything was controlled by the HBC because they had the biggest guns and an arsenal of bio weapons including diseases and liquour. Anything the common men and women wanted to do, they had to go through the company, such as putting their canoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with the Natives, and if they did, they were fined. Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we have seen. What it was then— it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetual charter but the royals, and the deceivers who work for them, make believe that elected officials are enacting laws. The same system is still in place. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The key to the solution, or the way to contest this back then—as it is now —is to refute any law that is repugnant to Natural Law. The kings and queens have sworn an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatever contracts they have entered into they must not be repugnant. But if they are, and everyone still agrees to uphold them, the royals are exonerated. What was meant to be checks and balances on the laws, had been ignored. The Kings and Queens did whatever they wanted through threats or violence! Nothing has changed still to this day. If men and women don't object, they agree, and the Hudson Bay Company got away with it for 250 years, i.e. from 1670 till 1920 supposedly. We will dive in a littler deeper and see what we may discover! _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How do MONARCHS maintain and justify their power of illusion? The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king was in charge because God had chosen him. They also think they as a king are above the law. For those who defied the king including lords were punished and lost their land and title. Some kings would execute lords and mount their heads on pikes to show the power of the king. The king threatened lords and nobles into serving him using federal authority and power as a threat to make them follow him. Pretty much what is happening today in the Canada corporation as the heirs maintain the Charter of Hudson Bay Corporation! _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ An absolute monarchy is a form of dictatorship government in which an all-powerful king or queen rules a state. This form of government was popular in Europe toward the end of the medieval period all the way up to twenty first century. Rulers in an absolute monarchy had total control over their corporations. Most believed they had the divine right to rule, meaning that God created the monarchy they ruled over and they alone were God’s representative on Earth. These monarchs ruled for life and power was passed down through bloodlines, meaning their children ruled after them, creating a dynasty. Causes of Absolutism Before the time of the all-powerful monarchs, Europe had decentralized governments. Planned and created by Kings - Invasions by Vikings and other “barbarian” groups were orchestrated in stealth. They created fear amongst the population. This created a perfect environment for these all-powerful leaders to rise. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Effects of Absolutism Once absolute monarchs gained power, they began to consolidate, or reinforce, their power within their borders. They would set up large royal courts, which were an extended royal household, including all those who regularly attend to the monarch and the royal family. Monarchs did this in order to appear more powerful and to control the nobility. They also regulated religion to control the spread of ideas. If monarchs could control what the people were hearing, they could keep their power. Large bureaucracies were also created in order to control the economy. They use this today continually with their propaganda of wars to keep the people in perpetual fear. Fear is an effective force to control society. It is used to divide people in a society and validate racist/bigoted/homophobic/etc ideas. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ As we move forward in time as to how these monarchs work their stealth, strategy and finance both sides of every war. They are cunning and scrupulous manipulators. Also they are above the law. Same as today in Two thousand and twenty-five. In the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, these HBC people have a country where they can do whatever they want an make as much money as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift. King Charles was looking at options to get out of the contract he had made; it was a contract that he had signed, and he took an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to uphold his contracts. This was no way for royals to do business.......poof! The deceivers were at work building a new illusion. The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ACT TWO (THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT) A body is sawed in two and then put back together again with the BNA Act of 1867. In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charter back from the Hudson Bay Company. She joined the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed a dominion called British North America by passing an act. This act was called the British North America Act (BNA Act). The 1867 BNA Act formed a British dominion, called British North America. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT THREE (REPATRIATION OF THE RUPERT’S LAND ACT) And now, men and woman, the two parts of the body will be rejoined into one! Recapitulation: there were two corporate entities running side by side, the dominion, British North America (Canada) and the Hudson Bay Company. Next, we will see the Queen use her magic pen and her weapons of force to ensure she gets what she wants. Queen Victoria demanded the Hudson Bay Charter back. By making a "country" called British North America, the queen forced the HBC to be admitted into the newly formed country. Now the HBC Charter was given back to Her Majesty, for the price of 12 million pounds. Victoria got her piece of paper but the men and women of the land had to pay for it, as usual. Some things never change. 31 July 1868, HBC had to surrender their charter to the queen, and her majesty's successors and heirs in perpetuity. The Deed of Surrender or Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order is an 1870 British order in council that transferred ownership of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory from the United Kingdom to the newly created Dominion of Canada. The Deed ended just over 200 years of Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) control over Rupert's Land and began western Canadian expansion. Often confused with the Rupert's Land Act 1868, the deed is different as the act only expressed that the United Kingdom and Canada permitted the transfer, but did not settle on the details of exchange with HBC, which were outlined in the Deed of Surrender. Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105(U.K.) ACT FOUR (STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT) On June 9th 1893, queen Victoria pulls a rabbit out of her hat and un-enacts the BNA Act, 26 years after she had formed it. The rabbit (or the country now called Canada) which Queen Victoria pulled out of her hat 26 years ago hopped away! The BNA Act disappeared! The dominion of British North America was removed by the queen with her Statute Law Revision Act of 1893, but no one knew what she had done. Even today, no one knows, except insiders. Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No.3 Let the curtains fall so we can have an intermission and reflect on what it means that there is no Act, no Parliament, no Constitution, no de jure laws. The queen, Elizabeth II, did NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia, or any other Province or Territory in Canada Corporation. Many have discovered that the Lieutenant Governor, who represents the queen, also does NOT sign the laws into being. Zip! Nothing! Its all a grand illusion. _____________________________________________________ The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of the Canadian monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. This vice was created in 1871, and has served the crown ever since. The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? Because the laws are repugnant to Natural Law Here is what Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor said: “As Head of State, I have the same mandate as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustain democratic governance . . . NONE! Thus Her Majesty is our head of State, while the Governor General is the de=facto Head of State, and neither is in command of Provincial or Territorial jurisdiction! A Head of State however is the CEO of the Province and is required to sign all state documents in the name of the People to render them into law.” But neither Iona Campagnolo, nor the queen sign them! Abracadabra! There are NO de jure laws in B.C or any of the provinces in the Corporation called Canada. Now the curtains suddenly malfunction and come crashing down on the deceivers, sending them scurrying and the stage hands scrambling to get things righted. When your in court, challenging the legal "name game" (the strawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’s physical birth), the judges will roll their his eyes in many cases. When you start reading the words by Iona Campagnolo, that related to the fact that she did not sign the laws and neither did the queen. Judges panic: Lawyers may be confused " don't even understand what this is all about!" The judges know your challenging the jurisdiction of the court." The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someone admit they have no power and then sign the documents into law?" Judges, Mayors, MP’s, MLA’s, Police all assumed she was signing them. Many have found out later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signing them. That is Iona Campagnolo was a very smart, no nonsense lady, who was exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability. What she said in her speech was, "I am supposed to be signing these documents into law, but I am not, and therefore there is no law." Why did the queen not signing the laws? Because, they are repugnant to Natural Law. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing them either. So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charter jurisdiction. The minute you step into Natural Law jurisdiction, or a higher ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jurisdiction, they don’t apply. The full liability would land on the Queen and Lieutenant Governor in Commerce Law jurisdiction. The curtains have been secured and the deceivers Show has been restored soon to the next act! Act Five Repatriation of the Constitution A New Deceiver Called Pierre Trudeau was on the stage and ready to maintain the fraud or lie for his master the Queen, Elizabeth II of England. Trudeau, the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, revived the BNA Act, in an effort to continue the deception that de-facto Canada status as a country with a (legitimate) parliament and a Constitution was a de-jure, and the ability to make its own laws de-jure and govern itself. Which was all smoke and mirrors as you will learn the facts To solve their problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act had been repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify. There was no mechanism to restore the BNA Act, because the BNA Act created the parliament and the parliament had been virtually dissolved, so they couldn’t even pass an act to create themselves! The Queen’s deceivers had the more powerful legalize or weasel words. Trudeau was ordered to name the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982, adding in a Charter and Bill of Rights and freedoms. Which you will all learn were smoke and mirror as they actually removed your unalienable rights. Here are Facts of the Charter of Rights and Freedom you may not yet know or comprehend . Charter of so called rights are privileges and can be removed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation are FALSE! So when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information. THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play: Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. Must be satisfied first to be ratified. Has never been satisfied by Quebec. Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced. This proved that the so called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here. Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth. Part 7 sections 58 Section 58: commencement Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation) Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec (1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied) (2) Authorization of Quebec A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec (This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec) (3) Repeal of this section This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force) Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada (a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province (This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English) Part 1 Section 32 Application of Charter (1) This charter applies (a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (This section covers parliament and government employees) (b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province (This section covers parliament and government employees provincially) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Exemption (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force (This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play) Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances (This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice) Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. (This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial) Act Six Queen Elizabeth's Proclamation With the help from Trudeau the Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, a string of scarves from her sleeve. Scarves and more scarves many miles long as the queen smiles confidently. This is perhaps the most clever trick of all . . . . Proclamation of April 17, 1982, Of particular interest is this sentence from the queen's proclamation: "Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two." Here is enlarged copy of the Proclamation 1982 If you Notice at the Top Queen Elizabeth Signature and then as well as the Minister of Justice, Jean Chrétien. As you clearly identify from the Document. This is where it gets very interesting – Queen Elizabeth never signed at the bottom of this Document. We are all contract signed with our signature/s or autograph at the end of a contract, indicating that the parties have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions outlined in the document. Signing at the top means you have removed yourself from liability. With your wet ink signature or autograph at the end of the entire contract verifies you have read and agree to all the terms in the contract. Furthermore all parties must sign with the same instrument. When signing a document or agreement, putting your initials on all pages before the last page where your full name and signature is requested is a common practice. Initialing each page serves as a way to indicate that you have reviewed and agreed to the contents of the entire document. It helps to prevent any unauthorized modifications or substitutions of pages after you have signed the document. By initialing each page, you are essentially confirming your acceptance of the terms and conditions stated throughout the document. We are told to sign at the end, where the signature blocks are usually placed. Magicians use a variety of techniques, including psychology, misdirection, and sleight of hand, to create the illusion Now this brings us back to what Iona Victoria Campagnolo had said in her speech The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did Not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? We have done some research on this as Dallas Hills as brought this to our attention over the last fifteen years. Dallas has also published videos on this important research. and produced numerous videos on the fact Queen Elizabeth never signed the Constitutional Act of 1982. Dallas Hills also has questioned Queen Victoria signing of this so important document that supposedly created the dominion called Canada. How could this be factual when their is NO SIGNITURE on the BNA Act, So in fact this is just more evidence that the entire de-facto government has never had any authority to govern let alone make any policies. Now with this evidence their is much confusion about Queen Victoria's role in signing the BNA Act of 1867. The British North America Act received Royal Assent on March 29, 1867, but it was not signed by Queen Victoria herself. It states that when the Governor General assents to a Bill in the Queen's Name, he sends an authentic copy of the Act, implying that the Governor General, not the Queen, signs the Act. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ And seem to suggest that Queen Victoria was involved in the process, but they don't explicitly state that she signed the Act. It's worth noting that provides the text of the Act, but it doesn't mention Queen Victoria's signature. So, to summarize, while Queen Victoria played a role in the process, there's no conclusive evidence to suggest that she personally signed the BNA Act of 1867. Now in regards to Queen Elizabeth this is all we have been able to find as an explanation. The Canada Act 1982, which was signed by Queen Elizabeth II at the top, but not at the bottom. This is an interesting exception to the typical convention of signing at the end of a document. In this case, the Queen's signature at the top of the document is known as a "broad seal," which is a formal way of authenticating a document in accordance with royal protocol. The broad seal is usually affixed to the top of the document, and it signifies the Queen's approval and authorization of the contents. So, while it might seem unusual to us, the Queen's signature at the top of the Canada Act 1982 is a deliberate choice that follows traditional royal protocol. If men and women accept this a a legal contract then they have been deceived again. The operative words here are “subject to section 59” of the Constitution Act. Now section 59 defers to section 23(of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is the language issue. So, the people of Quebec would have to agree that in their province, children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this is never going to fly. They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. So section 59/23 is the condition for which the Constitution Act of 1982 will come into force and effect" And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, there the Constitution Act. To add more facts the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and the Charlottetown Accord of 1992. Both failed. Pierre Trudeau came out of retirement to oppose the Accord.as it would weaken federal power. Simple facts is there has been no ratification No matter what anyone says about Canada’s Constitution Act, it is sitting in limbo subject to section 59. Section 59 says, when 23 is satisfied, there has to be another Proclamation and this section has to be not only repealed, but disappeared. All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, so that takes us back to the Hudson Bay Charter. And the one who owns the Hudson Bay Charter is Queen Elizabeth II, or someone in her family. When she mentions the word "Canada" in her proclamation, The Queen is not talking about a country, she is talking about the Hudson Bay Corporation or charter. Who ever owns the Royal Charter corporation, owns all of the resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women of Canada. “Now Know You Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two.” The 1982 Constitution with its Bill of Rights never came into force. That is why, when you go into court and try to assert your freedom rights by way of the Constitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you just gave them jurisdiction. The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove too inflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name and connotations of the BNA/Constitution Act going all the way back to 1867. They want to pretend like the 1867 BNA Act was never there! And this new Constitution Act in 1982 has always been here, but it has not. Another interesting part of the Queen’s Proclamation is this: “Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.” Queen Elizabet is talking to two sets of people here, “my subjects” and “all others” who are not my subjects. You are free to not be my subject. You, who are outside my subjects, and still want to interact with this document, “whom these Presents may concern”, you must govern yourselves accordingly. This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are No laws, No government, No acts, No parliament, and No legislature. All there is, is whatever they can get with their Hudson Bay Charter. This show is complete! We always had the lawful unalienable Right for Self-determination. We can create our own Contract, Charter, Constitution that removes a de-facto system and replace with a de-jure system. THE ILLUSION vs JURISDICTIONS Please share so we may end this fraud!

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 The Hudson Bay Company Charter is the true enemy and continues this present day hidden To comprehend how and why all the men and women have No Property will be educated in this important video. Please share so we may all become informed to rectify these injustice. Thank You Knowledge is Power - Dallas hills We will start here and go deep into the past to connect all the dots to where this all started. From their we will be able to end the illusion once and for all. Lets get started Pierre- Andre Pare believes that owning a house and owning a car are privileges in Quebec and that the State should be able to put an end to these.. "All is privilege conceded by the State: your car, your house, your profession, in short your life; and what the state gives (you), it can take back (from you) if you’re not a docile taxpayer." Pierre-André Paré, former Deputy Minister at the Quebec Department of Revenue before a commission of the National Assembly of Quebec. Published byLe Devoir, April 6, 1996.) [Council Order 863-96, July 10, 1996 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "The discretion of a judge is said to be the law of tyrants. It is always unknown. It is different in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. In the best, it is sometimes caprice. In the worst, it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature is liable." Justice Charles Pratt, Lord Camden (1714-1794) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT ONE (THE ROYAL CHARTER) Smoke and mirrors and Rupert's Land Act appears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called "The Governor and Company Of Adventurers of England Trading in the Hudson Bay". It would later be called the Hudson Bay Company or HBC. The charter comprised 40% of what is now the Canadian landmass, and included much of what is currently the U.S. states of Minnesota and North Dakota. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Charles II King of England, (Scotland, France, and Ireland and Defender of the Faith) The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670. King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The deed was in the name of the monarch, fully and forever, for all heirs in perpetual succession. It can never be revoked. Rupert held the rights to "sole trade and commerce" of this enormous land. King Charles II called his cousin and the 17 associates the "true and absolute Lords and Proprietors" of what would now be referred to as Rupert's Land. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Never mind the millions of people whose ancestor's, successors and heirs, already inhabited the land, the Native People, plus the Native settlers. (Being born in a specific location on the land, makes you Native to the land (the BNA Act and the Indian Act were created by the de-facto Canada corporation which has complete control over all the land- and all men and women. Chief and band councils were created by the Corporation of Canada within the Indian Act, which as you may Not Know? This video will give you information to do your own research. Educate yourself so we may take the steps to correct this serious injustice that effects us all. This Indian Act is a piece of Canadian legislation, which is why Native men and women are tenants and we can never own the land that was stolen from us through their deception. As it is now, The King and Queens and their heirs own all the land. ,all of whom would come to despise and loathe the ruthless Hudson Bay Company. The charter's partners ran into their forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those on the outside, who hated this company. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the fur trade, forestry, minerals, the waterways, and everything else. It was a full-on monopoly, plus, they could make their own laws and enforce them. And all members of the HBC had to take oaths back to the King or Queen, as they still do today. No one knows what the actual deal was between King Charles and Prince Rupert, and we are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told that in exchange for the deed, the Hudson Bay Company owed the British Royals two beaver pelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might have meant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaver pelts, and two elk heads might have been a way of saying this business" fleeces them, decapitates them, and mounts their heads like trophies". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Hudson Bay Company ran like this for 200 years. From its first beginnings in North America, the HBC pulled a large Proportion of men and women into the web of capitalist economy. Being predominantly a trading company, the HBC was dependent on labour to fill its ships headed to European markets. Fur trappers were predominantly originals or Métis (but also French, Scottish and others), and worked for the HBC not as partners but as exploited workers. With 200 years of exploitation of resources they depleted everything in their path and financially were no longer a viable company on its own. After all the struggle and competition, it was obvious that the fur trade would soon come to an end. One of the main reasons of the end of the fur trade was that the beavers' and other animals' populations were decreasing due to the overwhelming harvesting depleting the population of a species more quickly than it can reproduce and recover. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Under severe economic pressure brought about by their fierce competition, the Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company. amalgamated in 1821, and King Charles II of England ordered Hudson's Bay Company to create colonies. The number of beavers and river otters killed during the fur trade was devastating for the animals' North American populations. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, river and water management and other vital needs were also ravaged, leading to ecological destruction, significant environmental change, and even drought in certain areas. Following this degradation, both the river otter and beaver populations in North America would continue to decline, which brought great hardship for the original and settlers. Originals, Metis and settlers population were devastated by the fur trade and many hardships and deaths occurred. Still to this day many are unaware that smallpox was used a biological warfare, that was deliberately introduced to exterminate millions. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon Once introduced into North America, smallpox spread everywhere. Intentionally to kill people! Now here is some alarming information: Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population and was instrumental in the fall of the empires of the Aztecs and the Incas. Similarly, on the eastern coast of North America, smallpox was planned as a biological weapon and led to a decline of millions of originals, Metis and settler native population. The devastating effects of smallpox also gave rise to one of the first examples of biological warfare. During the French-Indian War (1754–1767), Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, suggested the deliberate use of smallpox to diminish the American Indian population hostile to the British. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by S Riedel · 2005 · Cited by 1350 — Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it was actually a for-profit corporation, called the Hudson Bay Company. Everything came down to paying fees and penalties, using the corporate court system to uphold laws and make money. Everything was controlled by the HBC because they had the biggest guns and an arsenal of bio weapons including diseases and liquour. Anything the common men and women wanted to do, they had to go through the company, such as putting their canoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with the Natives, and if they did, they were fined. Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we have seen. What it was then— it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetual charter but the royals, and the deceivers who work for them, make believe that elected officials are enacting laws. The same system is still in place. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The key to the solution, or the way to contest this back then—as it is now —is to refute any law that is repugnant to Natural Law. The kings and queens have sworn an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatever contracts they have entered into they must not be repugnant. But if they are, and everyone still agrees to uphold them, the royals are exonerated. What was meant to be checks and balances on the laws, had been ignored. The Kings and Queens did whatever they wanted through threats or violence! Nothing has changed still to this day. If men and women don't object, they agree, and the Hudson Bay Company got away with it for 250 years, i.e. from 1670 till 1920 supposedly. We will dive in a littler deeper and see what we may discover! _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How do MONARCHS maintain and justify their power of illusion? The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king was in charge because God had chosen him. They also think they as a king are above the law. For those who defied the king including lords were punished and lost their land and title. Some kings would execute lords and mount their heads on pikes to show the power of the king. The king threatened lords and nobles into serving him using federal authority and power as a threat to make them follow him. Pretty much what is happening today in the Canada corporation as the heirs maintain the Charter of Hudson Bay Corporation! _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ An absolute monarchy is a form of dictatorship government in which an all-powerful king or queen rules a state. This form of government was popular in Europe toward the end of the medieval period all the way up to twenty first century. Rulers in an absolute monarchy had total control over their corporations. Most believed they had the divine right to rule, meaning that God created the monarchy they ruled over and they alone were God’s representative on Earth. These monarchs ruled for life and power was passed down through bloodlines, meaning their children ruled after them, creating a dynasty. Causes of Absolutism Before the time of the all-powerful monarchs, Europe had decentralized governments. Planned and created by Kings - Invasions by Vikings and other “barbarian” groups were orchestrated in stealth. They created fear amongst the population. This created a perfect environment for these all-powerful leaders to rise. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Effects of Absolutism Once absolute monarchs gained power, they began to consolidate, or reinforce, their power within their borders. They would set up large royal courts, which were an extended royal household, including all those who regularly attend to the monarch and the royal family. Monarchs did this in order to appear more powerful and to control the nobility. They also regulated religion to control the spread of ideas. If monarchs could control what the people were hearing, they could keep their power. Large bureaucracies were also created in order to control the economy. They use this today continually with their propaganda of wars to keep the people in perpetual fear. Fear is an effective force to control society. It is used to divide people in a society and validate racist/bigoted/homophobic/etc ideas. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ As we move forward in time as to how these monarchs work their stealth, strategy and finance both sides of every war. They are cunning and scrupulous manipulators. Also they are above the law. Same as today in Two thousand and twenty-five. In the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, these HBC people have a country where they can do whatever they want an make as much money as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift. King Charles was looking at options to get out of the contract he had made; it was a contract that he had signed, and he took an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to uphold his contracts. This was no way for royals to do business.......poof! The deceivers were at work building a new illusion. The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ACT TWO (THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT) A body is sawed in two and then put back together again with the BNA Act of 1867. In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charter back from the Hudson Bay Company. She joined the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed a dominion called British North America by passing an act. This act was called the British North America Act (BNA Act). The 1867 BNA Act formed a British dominion, called British North America. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT THREE (REPATRIATION OF THE RUPERT’S LAND ACT) And now, men and woman, the two parts of the body will be rejoined into one! Recapitulation: there were two corporate entities running side by side, the dominion, British North America (Canada) and the Hudson Bay Company. Next, we will see the Queen use her magic pen and her weapons of force to ensure she gets what she wants. Queen Victoria demanded the Hudson Bay Charter back. By making a "country" called British North America, the queen forced the HBC to be admitted into the newly formed country. Now the HBC Charter was given back to Her Majesty, for the price of 12 million pounds. Victoria got her piece of paper but the men and women of the land had to pay for it, as usual. Some things never change. 31 July 1868, HBC had to surrender their charter to the queen, and her majesty's successors and heirs in perpetuity. The Deed of Surrender or Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order is an 1870 British order in council that transferred ownership of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory from the United Kingdom to the newly created Dominion of Canada. The Deed ended just over 200 years of Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) control over Rupert's Land and began western Canadian expansion. Often confused with the Rupert's Land Act 1868, the deed is different as the act only expressed that the United Kingdom and Canada permitted the transfer, but did not settle on the details of exchange with HBC, which were outlined in the Deed of Surrender. Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105(U.K.) ACT FOUR (STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT) On June 9th 1893, queen Victoria pulls a rabbit out of her hat and un-enacts the BNA Act, 26 years after she had formed it. The rabbit (or the country now called Canada) which Queen Victoria pulled out of her hat 26 years ago hopped away! The BNA Act disappeared! The dominion of British North America was removed by the queen with her Statute Law Revision Act of 1893, but no one knew what she had done. Even today, no one knows, except insiders. Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No.3 Let the curtains fall so we can have an intermission and reflect on what it means that there is no Act, no Parliament, no Constitution, no de jure laws. The queen, Elizabeth II, did NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia, or any other Province or Territory in Canada Corporation. Many have discovered that the Lieutenant Governor, who represents the queen, also does NOT sign the laws into being. Zip! Nothing! Its all a grand illusion. _____________________________________________________ The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of the Canadian monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. This vice was created in 1871, and has served the crown ever since. The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? Because the laws are repugnant to Natural Law Here is what Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor said: “As Head of State, I have the same mandate as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustain democratic governance . . . NONE! Thus Her Majesty is our head of State, while the Governor General is the de=facto Head of State, and neither is in command of Provincial or Territorial jurisdiction! A Head of State however is the CEO of the Province and is required to sign all state documents in the name of the People to render them into law.” But neither Iona Campagnolo, nor the queen sign them! Abracadabra! There are NO de jure laws in B.C or any of the provinces in the Corporation called Canada. Now the curtains suddenly malfunction and come crashing down on the deceivers, sending them scurrying and the stage hands scrambling to get things righted. When your in court, challenging the legal "name game" (the strawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’s physical birth), the judges will roll their his eyes in many cases. When you start reading the words by Iona Campagnolo, that related to the fact that she did not sign the laws and neither did the queen. Judges panic: Lawyers may be confused " don't even understand what this is all about!" The judges know your challenging the jurisdiction of the court." The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someone admit they have no power and then sign the documents into law?" Judges, Mayors, MP’s, MLA’s, Police all assumed she was signing them. Many have found out later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signing them. That is Iona Campagnolo was a very smart, no nonsense lady, who was exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability. What she said in her speech was, "I am supposed to be signing these documents into law, but I am not, and therefore there is no law." Why did the queen not signing the laws? Because, they are repugnant to Natural Law. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing them either. So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charter jurisdiction. The minute you step into Natural Law jurisdiction, or a higher ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jurisdiction, they don’t apply. The full liability would land on the Queen and Lieutenant Governor in Commerce Law jurisdiction. The curtains have been secured and the deceivers Show has been restored soon to the next act! Act Five Repatriation of the Constitution A New Deceiver Called Pierre Trudeau was on the stage and ready to maintain the fraud or lie for his master the Queen, Elizabeth II of England. Trudeau, the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, revived the BNA Act, in an effort to continue the deception that de-facto Canada status as a country with a (legitimate) parliament and a Constitution was a de-jure, and the ability to make its own laws de-jure and govern itself. Which was all smoke and mirrors as you will learn the facts To solve their problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act had been repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify. There was no mechanism to restore the BNA Act, because the BNA Act created the parliament and the parliament had been virtually dissolved, so they couldn’t even pass an act to create themselves! The Queen’s deceivers had the more powerful legalize or weasel words. Trudeau was ordered to name the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982, adding in a Charter and Bill of Rights and freedoms. Which you will all learn were smoke and mirror as they actually removed your unalienable rights. Here are Facts of the Charter of Rights and Freedom you may not yet know or comprehend . Charter of so called rights are privileges and can be removed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation are FALSE! So when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information. THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play: Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. Must be satisfied first to be ratified. Has never been satisfied by Quebec. Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced. This proved that the so called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here. Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth. Part 7 sections 58 Section 58: commencement Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation) Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec (1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied) (2) Authorization of Quebec A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec (This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec) (3) Repeal of this section This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force) Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada (a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province (This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English) Part 1 Section 32 Application of Charter (1) This charter applies (a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (This section covers parliament and government employees) (b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province (This section covers parliament and government employees provincially) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Exemption (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force (This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play) Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances (This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice) Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. (This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial) Act Six Queen Elizabeth's Proclamation With the help from Trudeau the Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, a string of scarves from her sleeve. Scarves and more scarves many miles long as the queen smiles confidently. This is perhaps the most clever trick of all . . . . Proclamation of April 17, 1982, Of particular interest is this sentence from the queen's proclamation: "Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two." Here is enlarged copy of the Proclamation 1982 If you Notice at the Top Queen Elizabeth Signature and then as well as the Minister of Justice, Jean Chrétien. As you clearly identify from the Document. This is where it gets very interesting – Queen Elizabeth never signed at the bottom of this Document. We are all contract signed with our signature/s or autograph at the end of a contract, indicating that the parties have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions outlined in the document. Signing at the top means you have removed yourself from liability. With your wet ink signature or autograph at the end of the entire contract verifies you have read and agree to all the terms in the contract. Furthermore all parties must sign with the same instrument. When signing a document or agreement, putting your initials on all pages before the last page where your full name and signature is requested is a common practice. Initialing each page serves as a way to indicate that you have reviewed and agreed to the contents of the entire document. It helps to prevent any unauthorized modifications or substitutions of pages after you have signed the document. By initialing each page, you are essentially confirming your acceptance of the terms and conditions stated throughout the document. We are told to sign at the end, where the signature blocks are usually placed. Magicians use a variety of techniques, including psychology, misdirection, and sleight of hand, to create the illusion Now this brings us back to what Iona Victoria Campagnolo had said in her speech The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did Not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? We have done some research on this as Dallas Hills as brought this to our attention over the last fifteen years. Dallas has also published videos on this important research. and produced numerous videos on the fact Queen Elizabeth never signed the Constitutional Act of 1982. Dallas Hills also has questioned Queen Victoria signing of this so important document that supposedly created the dominion called Canada. How could this be factual when their is NO SIGNITURE on the BNA Act, So in fact this is just more evidence that the entire de-facto government has never had any authority to govern let alone make any policies. Now with this evidence their is much confusion about Queen Victoria's role in signing the BNA Act of 1867. The British North America Act received Royal Assent on March 29, 1867, but it was not signed by Queen Victoria herself. It states that when the Governor General assents to a Bill in the Queen's Name, he sends an authentic copy of the Act, implying that the Governor General, not the Queen, signs the Act. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ And seem to suggest that Queen Victoria was involved in the process, but they don't explicitly state that she signed the Act. It's worth noting that provides the text of the Act, but it doesn't mention Queen Victoria's signature. So, to summarize, while Queen Victoria played a role in the process, there's no conclusive evidence to suggest that she personally signed the BNA Act of 1867. Now in regards to Queen Elizabeth this is all we have been able to find as an explanation. The Canada Act 1982, which was signed by Queen Elizabeth II at the top, but not at the bottom. This is an interesting exception to the typical convention of signing at the end of a document. In this case, the Queen's signature at the top of the document is known as a "broad seal," which is a formal way of authenticating a document in accordance with royal protocol. The broad seal is usually affixed to the top of the document, and it signifies the Queen's approval and authorization of the contents. So, while it might seem unusual to us, the Queen's signature at the top of the Canada Act 1982 is a deliberate choice that follows traditional royal protocol. If men and women accept this a a legal contract then they have been deceived again. The operative words here are “subject to section 59” of the Constitution Act. Now section 59 defers to section 23(of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is the language issue. So, the people of Quebec would have to agree that in their province, children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this is never going to fly. They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. So section 59/23 is the condition for which the Constitution Act of 1982 will come into force and effect" And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, there the Constitution Act. To add more facts the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and the Charlottetown Accord of 1992. Both failed. Pierre Trudeau came out of retirement to oppose the Accord.as it would weaken federal power. Simple facts is there has been no ratification No matter what anyone says about Canada’s Constitution Act, it is sitting in limbo subject to section 59. Section 59 says, when 23 is satisfied, there has to be another Proclamation and this section has to be not only repealed, but disappeared. All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, so that takes us back to the Hudson Bay Charter. And the one who owns the Hudson Bay Charter is Queen Elizabeth II, or someone in her family. When she mentions the word "Canada" in her proclamation, The Queen is not talking about a country, she is talking about the Hudson Bay Corporation or charter. Who ever owns the Royal Charter corporation, owns all of the resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women of Canada. “Now Know You Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two.” The 1982 Constitution with its Bill of Rights never came into force. That is why, when you go into court and try to assert your freedom rights by way of the Constitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you just gave them jurisdiction. The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove too inflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name and connotations of the BNA/Constitution Act going all the way back to 1867. They want to pretend like the 1867 BNA Act was never there! And this new Constitution Act in 1982 has always been here, but it has not. Another interesting part of the Queen’s Proclamation is this: “Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.” Queen Elizabet is talking to two sets of people here, “my subjects” and “all others” who are not my subjects. You are free to not be my subject. You, who are outside my subjects, and still want to interact with this document, “whom these Presents may concern”, you must govern yourselves accordingly. This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are No laws, No government, No acts, No parliament, and No legislature. All there is, is whatever they can get with their Hudson Bay Charter. This show is complete! We always had the lawful unalienable Right for Self-determination. We can create our own Contract, Charter, Constitution that removes a de-facto system and replace with a de-jure system. THE ILLUSION vs JURISDICTIONS Please share so we may end this fraud!

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 The Hudson Bay Company Charter is the true enemy and continues this present day hidden To comprehend how and why all the men and women have No Property will be educated in this important video. Please share so we may all become informed to rectify these injustice. Thank You Knowledge is Power - Dallas hills We will start here and go deep into the past to connect all the dots to where this all started. From their we will be able to end the illusion once and for all. Lets get started Pierre- Andre Pare believes that owning a house and owning a car are privileges in Quebec and that the State should be able to put an end to these.. "All is privilege conceded by the State: your car, your house, your profession, in short your life; and what the state gives (you), it can take back (from you) if you’re not a docile taxpayer." Pierre-André Paré, former Deputy Minister at the Quebec Department of Revenue before a commission of the National Assembly of Quebec. Published byLe Devoir, April 6, 1996.) [Council Order 863-96, July 10, 1996 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "The discretion of a judge is said to be the law of tyrants. It is always unknown. It is different in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. In the best, it is sometimes caprice. In the worst, it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature is liable." Justice Charles Pratt, Lord Camden (1714-1794) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT ONE (THE ROYAL CHARTER) Smoke and mirrors and Rupert's Land Act appears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called "The Governor and Company Of Adventurers of England Trading in the Hudson Bay". It would later be called the Hudson Bay Company or HBC. The charter comprised 40% of what is now the Canadian landmass, and included much of what is currently the U.S. states of Minnesota and North Dakota. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Charles II King of England, (Scotland, France, and Ireland and Defender of the Faith) The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670. King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The deed was in the name of the monarch, fully and forever, for all heirs in perpetual succession. It can never be revoked. Rupert held the rights to "sole trade and commerce" of this enormous land. King Charles II called his cousin and the 17 associates the "true and absolute Lords and Proprietors" of what would now be referred to as Rupert's Land. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Never mind the millions of people whose ancestor's, successors and heirs, already inhabited the land, the Native People, plus the Native settlers. (Being born in a specific location on the land, makes you Native to the land (the BNA Act and the Indian Act were created by the de-facto Canada corporation which has complete control over all the land- and all men and women. Chief and band councils were created by the Corporation of Canada within the Indian Act, which as you may Not Know? This video will give you information to do your own research. Educate yourself so we may take the steps to correct this serious injustice that effects us all. This Indian Act is a piece of Canadian legislation, which is why Native men and women are tenants and we can never own the land that was stolen from us through their deception. As it is now, The King and Queens and their heirs own all the land. ,all of whom would come to despise and loathe the ruthless Hudson Bay Company. The charter's partners ran into their forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those on the outside, who hated this company. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the fur trade, forestry, minerals, the waterways, and everything else. It was a full-on monopoly, plus, they could make their own laws and enforce them. And all members of the HBC had to take oaths back to the King or Queen, as they still do today. No one knows what the actual deal was between King Charles and Prince Rupert, and we are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told that in exchange for the deed, the Hudson Bay Company owed the British Royals two beaver pelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might have meant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaver pelts, and two elk heads might have been a way of saying this business" fleeces them, decapitates them, and mounts their heads like trophies". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Hudson Bay Company ran like this for 200 years. From its first beginnings in North America, the HBC pulled a large Proportion of men and women into the web of capitalist economy. Being predominantly a trading company, the HBC was dependent on labour to fill its ships headed to European markets. Fur trappers were predominantly originals or Métis (but also French, Scottish and others), and worked for the HBC not as partners but as exploited workers. With 200 years of exploitation of resources they depleted everything in their path and financially were no longer a viable company on its own. After all the struggle and competition, it was obvious that the fur trade would soon come to an end. One of the main reasons of the end of the fur trade was that the beavers' and other animals' populations were decreasing due to the overwhelming harvesting depleting the population of a species more quickly than it can reproduce and recover. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Under severe economic pressure brought about by their fierce competition, the Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company. amalgamated in 1821, and King Charles II of England ordered Hudson's Bay Company to create colonies. The number of beavers and river otters killed during the fur trade was devastating for the animals' North American populations. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, river and water management and other vital needs were also ravaged, leading to ecological destruction, significant environmental change, and even drought in certain areas. Following this degradation, both the river otter and beaver populations in North America would continue to decline, which brought great hardship for the original and settlers. Originals, Metis and settlers population were devastated by the fur trade and many hardships and deaths occurred. Still to this day many are unaware that smallpox was used a biological warfare, that was deliberately introduced to exterminate millions. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon Once introduced into North America, smallpox spread everywhere. Intentionally to kill people! Now here is some alarming information: Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population and was instrumental in the fall of the empires of the Aztecs and the Incas. Similarly, on the eastern coast of North America, smallpox was planned as a biological weapon and led to a decline of millions of originals, Metis and settler native population. The devastating effects of smallpox also gave rise to one of the first examples of biological warfare. During the French-Indian War (1754–1767), Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, suggested the deliberate use of smallpox to diminish the American Indian population hostile to the British. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by S Riedel · 2005 · Cited by 1350 — Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it was actually a for-profit corporation, called the Hudson Bay Company. Everything came down to paying fees and penalties, using the corporate court system to uphold laws and make money. Everything was controlled by the HBC because they had the biggest guns and an arsenal of bio weapons including diseases and liquour. Anything the common men and women wanted to do, they had to go through the company, such as putting their canoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with the Natives, and if they did, they were fined. Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we have seen. What it was then— it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetual charter but the royals, and the deceivers who work for them, make believe that elected officials are enacting laws. The same system is still in place. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The key to the solution, or the way to contest this back then—as it is now —is to refute any law that is repugnant to Natural Law. The kings and queens have sworn an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatever contracts they have entered into they must not be repugnant. But if they are, and everyone still agrees to uphold them, the royals are exonerated. What was meant to be checks and balances on the laws, had been ignored. The Kings and Queens did whatever they wanted through threats or violence! Nothing has changed still to this day. If men and women don't object, they agree, and the Hudson Bay Company got away with it for 250 years, i.e. from 1670 till 1920 supposedly. We will dive in a littler deeper and see what we may discover! _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How do MONARCHS maintain and justify their power of illusion? The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king was in charge because God had chosen him. They also think they as a king are above the law. For those who defied the king including lords were punished and lost their land and title. Some kings would execute lords and mount their heads on pikes to show the power of the king. The king threatened lords and nobles into serving him using federal authority and power as a threat to make them follow him. Pretty much what is happening today in the Canada corporation as the heirs maintain the Charter of Hudson Bay Corporation! _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ An absolute monarchy is a form of dictatorship government in which an all-powerful king or queen rules a state. This form of government was popular in Europe toward the end of the medieval period all the way up to twenty first century. Rulers in an absolute monarchy had total control over their corporations. Most believed they had the divine right to rule, meaning that God created the monarchy they ruled over and they alone were God’s representative on Earth. These monarchs ruled for life and power was passed down through bloodlines, meaning their children ruled after them, creating a dynasty. Causes of Absolutism Before the time of the all-powerful monarchs, Europe had decentralized governments. Planned and created by Kings - Invasions by Vikings and other “barbarian” groups were orchestrated in stealth. They created fear amongst the population. This created a perfect environment for these all-powerful leaders to rise. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Effects of Absolutism Once absolute monarchs gained power, they began to consolidate, or reinforce, their power within their borders. They would set up large royal courts, which were an extended royal household, including all those who regularly attend to the monarch and the royal family. Monarchs did this in order to appear more powerful and to control the nobility. They also regulated religion to control the spread of ideas. If monarchs could control what the people were hearing, they could keep their power. Large bureaucracies were also created in order to control the economy. They use this today continually with their propaganda of wars to keep the people in perpetual fear. Fear is an effective force to control society. It is used to divide people in a society and validate racist/bigoted/homophobic/etc ideas. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ As we move forward in time as to how these monarchs work their stealth, strategy and finance both sides of every war. They are cunning and scrupulous manipulators. Also they are above the law. Same as today in Two thousand and twenty-five. In the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, these HBC people have a country where they can do whatever they want an make as much money as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift. King Charles was looking at options to get out of the contract he had made; it was a contract that he had signed, and he took an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to uphold his contracts. This was no way for royals to do business.......poof! The deceivers were at work building a new illusion. The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ACT TWO (THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT) A body is sawed in two and then put back together again with the BNA Act of 1867. In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charter back from the Hudson Bay Company. She joined the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed a dominion called British North America by passing an act. This act was called the British North America Act (BNA Act). The 1867 BNA Act formed a British dominion, called British North America. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT THREE (REPATRIATION OF THE RUPERT’S LAND ACT) And now, men and woman, the two parts of the body will be rejoined into one! Recapitulation: there were two corporate entities running side by side, the dominion, British North America (Canada) and the Hudson Bay Company. Next, we will see the Queen use her magic pen and her weapons of force to ensure she gets what she wants. Queen Victoria demanded the Hudson Bay Charter back. By making a "country" called British North America, the queen forced the HBC to be admitted into the newly formed country. Now the HBC Charter was given back to Her Majesty, for the price of 12 million pounds. Victoria got her piece of paper but the men and women of the land had to pay for it, as usual. Some things never change. 31 July 1868, HBC had to surrender their charter to the queen, and her majesty's successors and heirs in perpetuity. The Deed of Surrender or Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order is an 1870 British order in council that transferred ownership of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory from the United Kingdom to the newly created Dominion of Canada. The Deed ended just over 200 years of Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) control over Rupert's Land and began western Canadian expansion. Often confused with the Rupert's Land Act 1868, the deed is different as the act only expressed that the United Kingdom and Canada permitted the transfer, but did not settle on the details of exchange with HBC, which were outlined in the Deed of Surrender. Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105(U.K.) ACT FOUR (STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT) On June 9th 1893, queen Victoria pulls a rabbit out of her hat and un-enacts the BNA Act, 26 years after she had formed it. The rabbit (or the country now called Canada) which Queen Victoria pulled out of her hat 26 years ago hopped away! The BNA Act disappeared! The dominion of British North America was removed by the queen with her Statute Law Revision Act of 1893, but no one knew what she had done. Even today, no one knows, except insiders. Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No.3 Let the curtains fall so we can have an intermission and reflect on what it means that there is no Act, no Parliament, no Constitution, no de jure laws. The queen, Elizabeth II, did NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia, or any other Province or Territory in Canada Corporation. Many have discovered that the Lieutenant Governor, who represents the queen, also does NOT sign the laws into being. Zip! Nothing! Its all a grand illusion. _____________________________________________________ The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of the Canadian monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. This vice was created in 1871, and has served the crown ever since. The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? Because the laws are repugnant to Natural Law Here is what Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor said: “As Head of State, I have the same mandate as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustain democratic governance . . . NONE! Thus Her Majesty is our head of State, while the Governor General is the de=facto Head of State, and neither is in command of Provincial or Territorial jurisdiction! A Head of State however is the CEO of the Province and is required to sign all state documents in the name of the People to render them into law.” But neither Iona Campagnolo, nor the queen sign them! Abracadabra! There are NO de jure laws in B.C or any of the provinces in the Corporation called Canada. Now the curtains suddenly malfunction and come crashing down on the deceivers, sending them scurrying and the stage hands scrambling to get things righted. When your in court, challenging the legal "name game" (the strawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’s physical birth), the judges will roll their his eyes in many cases. When you start reading the words by Iona Campagnolo, that related to the fact that she did not sign the laws and neither did the queen. Judges panic: Lawyers may be confused " don't even understand what this is all about!" The judges know your challenging the jurisdiction of the court." The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someone admit they have no power and then sign the documents into law?" Judges, Mayors, MP’s, MLA’s, Police all assumed she was signing them. Many have found out later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signing them. That is Iona Campagnolo was a very smart, no nonsense lady, who was exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability. What she said in her speech was, "I am supposed to be signing these documents into law, but I am not, and therefore there is no law." Why did the queen not signing the laws? Because, they are repugnant to Natural Law. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing them either. So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charter jurisdiction. The minute you step into Natural Law jurisdiction, or a higher ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jurisdiction, they don’t apply. The full liability would land on the Queen and Lieutenant Governor in Commerce Law jurisdiction. The curtains have been secured and the deceivers Show has been restored soon to the next act! Act Five Repatriation of the Constitution A New Deceiver Called Pierre Trudeau was on the stage and ready to maintain the fraud or lie for his master the Queen, Elizabeth II of England. Trudeau, the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, revived the BNA Act, in an effort to continue the deception that de-facto Canada status as a country with a (legitimate) parliament and a Constitution was a de-jure, and the ability to make its own laws de-jure and govern itself. Which was all smoke and mirrors as you will learn the facts To solve their problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act had been repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify. There was no mechanism to restore the BNA Act, because the BNA Act created the parliament and the parliament had been virtually dissolved, so they couldn’t even pass an act to create themselves! The Queen’s deceivers had the more powerful legalize or weasel words. Trudeau was ordered to name the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982, adding in a Charter and Bill of Rights and freedoms. Which you will all learn were smoke and mirror as they actually removed your unalienable rights. Here are Facts of the Charter of Rights and Freedom you may not yet know or comprehend . Charter of so called rights are privileges and can be removed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation are FALSE! So when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information. THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play: Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. Must be satisfied first to be ratified. Has never been satisfied by Quebec. Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced. This proved that the so called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here. Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth. Part 7 sections 58 Section 58: commencement Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation) Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec (1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied) (2) Authorization of Quebec A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec (This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec) (3) Repeal of this section This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force) Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada (a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province (This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English) Part 1 Section 32 Application of Charter (1) This charter applies (a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (This section covers parliament and government employees) (b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province (This section covers parliament and government employees provincially) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Exemption (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force (This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play) Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances (This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice) Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. (This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial) Act Six Queen Elizabeth's Proclamation With the help from Trudeau the Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, a string of scarves from her sleeve. Scarves and more scarves many miles long as the queen smiles confidently. This is perhaps the most clever trick of all . . . . Proclamation of April 17, 1982, Of particular interest is this sentence from the queen's proclamation: "Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two." Here is enlarged copy of the Proclamation 1982 If you Notice at the Top Queen Elizabeth Signature and then as well as the Minister of Justice, Jean Chrétien. As you clearly identify from the Document. This is where it gets very interesting – Queen Elizabeth never signed at the bottom of this Document. We are all contract signed with our signature/s or autograph at the end of a contract, indicating that the parties have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions outlined in the document. Signing at the top means you have removed yourself from liability. With your wet ink signature or autograph at the end of the entire contract verifies you have read and agree to all the terms in the contract. Furthermore all parties must sign with the same instrument. When signing a document or agreement, putting your initials on all pages before the last page where your full name and signature is requested is a common practice. Initialing each page serves as a way to indicate that you have reviewed and agreed to the contents of the entire document. It helps to prevent any unauthorized modifications or substitutions of pages after you have signed the document. By initialing each page, you are essentially confirming your acceptance of the terms and conditions stated throughout the document. We are told to sign at the end, where the signature blocks are usually placed. Magicians use a variety of techniques, including psychology, misdirection, and sleight of hand, to create the illusion Now this brings us back to what Iona Victoria Campagnolo had said in her speech The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did Not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? We have done some research on this as Dallas Hills as brought this to our attention over the last fifteen years. Dallas has also published videos on this important research. and produced numerous videos on the fact Queen Elizabeth never signed the Constitutional Act of 1982. Dallas Hills also has questioned Queen Victoria signing of this so important document that supposedly created the dominion called Canada. How could this be factual when their is NO SIGNITURE on the BNA Act, So in fact this is just more evidence that the entire de-facto government has never had any authority to govern let alone make any policies. Now with this evidence their is much confusion about Queen Victoria's role in signing the BNA Act of 1867. The British North America Act received Royal Assent on March 29, 1867, but it was not signed by Queen Victoria herself. It states that when the Governor General assents to a Bill in the Queen's Name, he sends an authentic copy of the Act, implying that the Governor General, not the Queen, signs the Act. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ And seem to suggest that Queen Victoria was involved in the process, but they don't explicitly state that she signed the Act. It's worth noting that provides the text of the Act, but it doesn't mention Queen Victoria's signature. So, to summarize, while Queen Victoria played a role in the process, there's no conclusive evidence to suggest that she personally signed the BNA Act of 1867. Now in regards to Queen Elizabeth this is all we have been able to find as an explanation. The Canada Act 1982, which was signed by Queen Elizabeth II at the top, but not at the bottom. This is an interesting exception to the typical convention of signing at the end of a document. In this case, the Queen's signature at the top of the document is known as a "broad seal," which is a formal way of authenticating a document in accordance with royal protocol. The broad seal is usually affixed to the top of the document, and it signifies the Queen's approval and authorization of the contents. So, while it might seem unusual to us, the Queen's signature at the top of the Canada Act 1982 is a deliberate choice that follows traditional royal protocol. If men and women accept this a a legal contract then they have been deceived again. The operative words here are “subject to section 59” of the Constitution Act. Now section 59 defers to section 23(of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is the language issue. So, the people of Quebec would have to agree that in their province, children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this is never going to fly. They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. So section 59/23 is the condition for which the Constitution Act of 1982 will come into force and effect" And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, there the Constitution Act. To add more facts the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and the Charlottetown Accord of 1992. Both failed. Pierre Trudeau came out of retirement to oppose the Accord.as it would weaken federal power. Simple facts is there has been no ratification No matter what anyone says about Canada’s Constitution Act, it is sitting in limbo subject to section 59. Section 59 says, when 23 is satisfied, there has to be another Proclamation and this section has to be not only repealed, but disappeared. All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, so that takes us back to the Hudson Bay Charter. And the one who owns the Hudson Bay Charter is Queen Elizabeth II, or someone in her family. When she mentions the word "Canada" in her proclamation, The Queen is not talking about a country, she is talking about the Hudson Bay Corporation or charter. Who ever owns the Royal Charter corporation, owns all of the resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women of Canada. “Now Know You Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two.” The 1982 Constitution with its Bill of Rights never came into force. That is why, when you go into court and try to assert your freedom rights by way of the Constitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you just gave them jurisdiction. The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove too inflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name and connotations of the BNA/Constitution Act going all the way back to 1867. They want to pretend like the 1867 BNA Act was never there! And this new Constitution Act in 1982 has always been here, but it has not. Another interesting part of the Queen’s Proclamation is this: “Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.” Queen Elizabet is talking to two sets of people here, “my subjects” and “all others” who are not my subjects. You are free to not be my subject. You, who are outside my subjects, and still want to interact with this document, “whom these Presents may concern”, you must govern yourselves accordingly. This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are No laws, No government, No acts, No parliament, and No legislature. All there is, is whatever they can get with their Hudson Bay Charter. This show is complete! We always had the lawful unalienable Right for Self-determination. We can create our own Contract, Charter, Constitution that removes a de-facto system and replace with a de-jure system. THE ILLUSION vs JURISDICTIONS Please share so we may end this fraud!

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 The Hudson Bay Company Charter is the true enemy and continues this present day hidden To comprehend how and why all the men and women have No Property will be educated in this important video. Please share so we may all become informed to rectify these injustice. Thank You Knowledge is Power - Dallas hills We will start here and go deep into the past to connect all the dots to where this all started. From their we will be able to end the illusion once and for all. Lets get started Pierre- Andre Pare believes that owning a house and owning a car are privileges in Quebec and that the State should be able to put an end to these.. "All is privilege conceded by the State: your car, your house, your profession, in short your life; and what the state gives (you), it can take back (from you) if you’re not a docile taxpayer." Pierre-André Paré, former Deputy Minister at the Quebec Department of Revenue before a commission of the National Assembly of Quebec. Published byLe Devoir, April 6, 1996.) [Council Order 863-96, July 10, 1996 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ "The discretion of a judge is said to be the law of tyrants. It is always unknown. It is different in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. In the best, it is sometimes caprice. In the worst, it is every vice, folly and passion to which human nature is liable." Justice Charles Pratt, Lord Camden (1714-1794) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT ONE (THE ROYAL CHARTER) Smoke and mirrors and Rupert's Land Act appears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called "The Governor and Company Of Adventurers of England Trading in the Hudson Bay". It would later be called the Hudson Bay Company or HBC. The charter comprised 40% of what is now the Canadian landmass, and included much of what is currently the U.S. states of Minnesota and North Dakota. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Charles II King of England, (Scotland, France, and Ireland and Defender of the Faith) The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670. King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The Company of Adventurers". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The deed was in the name of the monarch, fully and forever, for all heirs in perpetual succession. It can never be revoked. Rupert held the rights to "sole trade and commerce" of this enormous land. King Charles II called his cousin and the 17 associates the "true and absolute Lords and Proprietors" of what would now be referred to as Rupert's Land. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Never mind the millions of people whose ancestor's, successors and heirs, already inhabited the land, the Native People, plus the Native settlers. (Being born in a specific location on the land, makes you Native to the land (the BNA Act and the Indian Act were created by the de-facto Canada corporation which has complete control over all the land- and all men and women. Chief and band councils were created by the Corporation of Canada within the Indian Act, which as you may Not Know? This video will give you information to do your own research. Educate yourself so we may take the steps to correct this serious injustice that effects us all. This Indian Act is a piece of Canadian legislation, which is why Native men and women are tenants and we can never own the land that was stolen from us through their deception. As it is now, The King and Queens and their heirs own all the land. ,all of whom would come to despise and loathe the ruthless Hudson Bay Company. The charter's partners ran into their forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those on the outside, who hated this company. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the fur trade, forestry, minerals, the waterways, and everything else. It was a full-on monopoly, plus, they could make their own laws and enforce them. And all members of the HBC had to take oaths back to the King or Queen, as they still do today. No one knows what the actual deal was between King Charles and Prince Rupert, and we are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told that in exchange for the deed, the Hudson Bay Company owed the British Royals two beaver pelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might have meant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaver pelts, and two elk heads might have been a way of saying this business" fleeces them, decapitates them, and mounts their heads like trophies". _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Hudson Bay Company ran like this for 200 years. From its first beginnings in North America, the HBC pulled a large Proportion of men and women into the web of capitalist economy. Being predominantly a trading company, the HBC was dependent on labour to fill its ships headed to European markets. Fur trappers were predominantly originals or Métis (but also French, Scottish and others), and worked for the HBC not as partners but as exploited workers. With 200 years of exploitation of resources they depleted everything in their path and financially were no longer a viable company on its own. After all the struggle and competition, it was obvious that the fur trade would soon come to an end. One of the main reasons of the end of the fur trade was that the beavers' and other animals' populations were decreasing due to the overwhelming harvesting depleting the population of a species more quickly than it can reproduce and recover. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Under severe economic pressure brought about by their fierce competition, the Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company. amalgamated in 1821, and King Charles II of England ordered Hudson's Bay Company to create colonies. The number of beavers and river otters killed during the fur trade was devastating for the animals' North American populations. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, river and water management and other vital needs were also ravaged, leading to ecological destruction, significant environmental change, and even drought in certain areas. Following this degradation, both the river otter and beaver populations in North America would continue to decline, which brought great hardship for the original and settlers. Originals, Metis and settlers population were devastated by the fur trade and many hardships and deaths occurred. Still to this day many are unaware that smallpox was used a biological warfare, that was deliberately introduced to exterminate millions. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Smallpox Used as a Biological Weapon Once introduced into North America, smallpox spread everywhere. Intentionally to kill people! Now here is some alarming information: Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population and was instrumental in the fall of the empires of the Aztecs and the Incas. Similarly, on the eastern coast of North America, smallpox was planned as a biological weapon and led to a decline of millions of originals, Metis and settler native population. The devastating effects of smallpox also gave rise to one of the first examples of biological warfare. During the French-Indian War (1754–1767), Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, suggested the deliberate use of smallpox to diminish the American Indian population hostile to the British. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by S Riedel · 2005 · Cited by 1350 — Unknown in the New World, smallpox was introduced by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors. The poison decimated the local population This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This pattern still apparent today in 2025 with these profit corporation raping everything in their path. The charter granted the company control of the land, but made no specific demands. This allowed HBC to go about gaining control of the land as it pleased and had the company chosen to settle the land with people and farms, the history of North America could be quite different. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it was actually a for-profit corporation, called the Hudson Bay Company. Everything came down to paying fees and penalties, using the corporate court system to uphold laws and make money. Everything was controlled by the HBC because they had the biggest guns and an arsenal of bio weapons including diseases and liquour. Anything the common men and women wanted to do, they had to go through the company, such as putting their canoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with the Natives, and if they did, they were fined. Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we have seen. What it was then— it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetual charter but the royals, and the deceivers who work for them, make believe that elected officials are enacting laws. The same system is still in place. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The key to the solution, or the way to contest this back then—as it is now —is to refute any law that is repugnant to Natural Law. The kings and queens have sworn an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatever contracts they have entered into they must not be repugnant. But if they are, and everyone still agrees to uphold them, the royals are exonerated. What was meant to be checks and balances on the laws, had been ignored. The Kings and Queens did whatever they wanted through threats or violence! Nothing has changed still to this day. If men and women don't object, they agree, and the Hudson Bay Company got away with it for 250 years, i.e. from 1670 till 1920 supposedly. We will dive in a littler deeper and see what we may discover! _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How do MONARCHS maintain and justify their power of illusion? The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king was in charge because God had chosen him. They also think they as a king are above the law. For those who defied the king including lords were punished and lost their land and title. Some kings would execute lords and mount their heads on pikes to show the power of the king. The king threatened lords and nobles into serving him using federal authority and power as a threat to make them follow him. Pretty much what is happening today in the Canada corporation as the heirs maintain the Charter of Hudson Bay Corporation! _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ An absolute monarchy is a form of dictatorship government in which an all-powerful king or queen rules a state. This form of government was popular in Europe toward the end of the medieval period all the way up to twenty first century. Rulers in an absolute monarchy had total control over their corporations. Most believed they had the divine right to rule, meaning that God created the monarchy they ruled over and they alone were God’s representative on Earth. These monarchs ruled for life and power was passed down through bloodlines, meaning their children ruled after them, creating a dynasty. Causes of Absolutism Before the time of the all-powerful monarchs, Europe had decentralized governments. Planned and created by Kings - Invasions by Vikings and other “barbarian” groups were orchestrated in stealth. They created fear amongst the population. This created a perfect environment for these all-powerful leaders to rise. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Effects of Absolutism Once absolute monarchs gained power, they began to consolidate, or reinforce, their power within their borders. They would set up large royal courts, which were an extended royal household, including all those who regularly attend to the monarch and the royal family. Monarchs did this in order to appear more powerful and to control the nobility. They also regulated religion to control the spread of ideas. If monarchs could control what the people were hearing, they could keep their power. Large bureaucracies were also created in order to control the economy. They use this today continually with their propaganda of wars to keep the people in perpetual fear. Fear is an effective force to control society. It is used to divide people in a society and validate racist/bigoted/homophobic/etc ideas. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ As we move forward in time as to how these monarchs work their stealth, strategy and finance both sides of every war. They are cunning and scrupulous manipulators. Also they are above the law. Same as today in Two thousand and twenty-five. In the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, these HBC people have a country where they can do whatever they want an make as much money as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift. King Charles was looking at options to get out of the contract he had made; it was a contract that he had signed, and he took an oath on the 1611 King James Bible to uphold his contracts. This was no way for royals to do business.......poof! The deceivers were at work building a new illusion. The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The New HBC and the New Nation to 1860 ACT TWO (THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT) A body is sawed in two and then put back together again with the BNA Act of 1867. In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charter back from the Hudson Bay Company. She joined the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed a dominion called British North America by passing an act. This act was called the British North America Act (BNA Act). The 1867 BNA Act formed a British dominion, called British North America. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ACT THREE (REPATRIATION OF THE RUPERT’S LAND ACT) And now, men and woman, the two parts of the body will be rejoined into one! Recapitulation: there were two corporate entities running side by side, the dominion, British North America (Canada) and the Hudson Bay Company. Next, we will see the Queen use her magic pen and her weapons of force to ensure she gets what she wants. Queen Victoria demanded the Hudson Bay Charter back. By making a "country" called British North America, the queen forced the HBC to be admitted into the newly formed country. Now the HBC Charter was given back to Her Majesty, for the price of 12 million pounds. Victoria got her piece of paper but the men and women of the land had to pay for it, as usual. Some things never change. 31 July 1868, HBC had to surrender their charter to the queen, and her majesty's successors and heirs in perpetuity. The Deed of Surrender or Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order is an 1870 British order in council that transferred ownership of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory from the United Kingdom to the newly created Dominion of Canada. The Deed ended just over 200 years of Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) control over Rupert's Land and began western Canadian expansion. Often confused with the Rupert's Land Act 1868, the deed is different as the act only expressed that the United Kingdom and Canada permitted the transfer, but did not settle on the details of exchange with HBC, which were outlined in the Deed of Surrender. Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105(U.K.) ACT FOUR (STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT) On June 9th 1893, queen Victoria pulls a rabbit out of her hat and un-enacts the BNA Act, 26 years after she had formed it. The rabbit (or the country now called Canada) which Queen Victoria pulled out of her hat 26 years ago hopped away! The BNA Act disappeared! The dominion of British North America was removed by the queen with her Statute Law Revision Act of 1893, but no one knew what she had done. Even today, no one knows, except insiders. Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No.3 Let the curtains fall so we can have an intermission and reflect on what it means that there is no Act, no Parliament, no Constitution, no de jure laws. The queen, Elizabeth II, did NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia, or any other Province or Territory in Canada Corporation. Many have discovered that the Lieutenant Governor, who represents the queen, also does NOT sign the laws into being. Zip! Nothing! Its all a grand illusion. _____________________________________________________ The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of the Canadian monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. This vice was created in 1871, and has served the crown ever since. The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? Because the laws are repugnant to Natural Law Here is what Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor said: “As Head of State, I have the same mandate as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustain democratic governance . . . NONE! Thus Her Majesty is our head of State, while the Governor General is the de=facto Head of State, and neither is in command of Provincial or Territorial jurisdiction! A Head of State however is the CEO of the Province and is required to sign all state documents in the name of the People to render them into law.” But neither Iona Campagnolo, nor the queen sign them! Abracadabra! There are NO de jure laws in B.C or any of the provinces in the Corporation called Canada. Now the curtains suddenly malfunction and come crashing down on the deceivers, sending them scurrying and the stage hands scrambling to get things righted. When your in court, challenging the legal "name game" (the strawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’s physical birth), the judges will roll their his eyes in many cases. When you start reading the words by Iona Campagnolo, that related to the fact that she did not sign the laws and neither did the queen. Judges panic: Lawyers may be confused " don't even understand what this is all about!" The judges know your challenging the jurisdiction of the court." The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someone admit they have no power and then sign the documents into law?" Judges, Mayors, MP’s, MLA’s, Police all assumed she was signing them. Many have found out later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signing them. That is Iona Campagnolo was a very smart, no nonsense lady, who was exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability. What she said in her speech was, "I am supposed to be signing these documents into law, but I am not, and therefore there is no law." Why did the queen not signing the laws? Because, they are repugnant to Natural Law. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing them either. So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charter jurisdiction. The minute you step into Natural Law jurisdiction, or a higher ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jurisdiction, they don’t apply. The full liability would land on the Queen and Lieutenant Governor in Commerce Law jurisdiction. The curtains have been secured and the deceivers Show has been restored soon to the next act! Act Five Repatriation of the Constitution A New Deceiver Called Pierre Trudeau was on the stage and ready to maintain the fraud or lie for his master the Queen, Elizabeth II of England. Trudeau, the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, revived the BNA Act, in an effort to continue the deception that de-facto Canada status as a country with a (legitimate) parliament and a Constitution was a de-jure, and the ability to make its own laws de-jure and govern itself. Which was all smoke and mirrors as you will learn the facts To solve their problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act had been repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify. There was no mechanism to restore the BNA Act, because the BNA Act created the parliament and the parliament had been virtually dissolved, so they couldn’t even pass an act to create themselves! The Queen’s deceivers had the more powerful legalize or weasel words. Trudeau was ordered to name the BNA Act to the Constitution Act of 1982, adding in a Charter and Bill of Rights and freedoms. Which you will all learn were smoke and mirror as they actually removed your unalienable rights. Here are Facts of the Charter of Rights and Freedom you may not yet know or comprehend . Charter of so called rights are privileges and can be removed Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation are FALSE! So when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information. THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play: Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. Must be satisfied first to be ratified. Has never been satisfied by Quebec. Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced. This proved that the so called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here. Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth. Part 7 sections 58 Section 58: commencement Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation) Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec (1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied) (2) Authorization of Quebec A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec (This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec) (3) Repeal of this section This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force) Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada (a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province (This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English) Part 1 Section 32 Application of Charter (1) This charter applies (a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (This section covers parliament and government employees) (b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province (This section covers parliament and government employees provincially) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Exemption (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force (This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play) Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances (This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice) Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. (This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial) Act Six Queen Elizabeth's Proclamation With the help from Trudeau the Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, a string of scarves from her sleeve. Scarves and more scarves many miles long as the queen smiles confidently. This is perhaps the most clever trick of all . . . . Proclamation of April 17, 1982, Of particular interest is this sentence from the queen's proclamation: "Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two." Here is enlarged copy of the Proclamation 1982 If you Notice at the Top Queen Elizabeth Signature and then as well as the Minister of Justice, Jean Chrétien. As you clearly identify from the Document. This is where it gets very interesting – Queen Elizabeth never signed at the bottom of this Document. We are all contract signed with our signature/s or autograph at the end of a contract, indicating that the parties have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions outlined in the document. Signing at the top means you have removed yourself from liability. With your wet ink signature or autograph at the end of the entire contract verifies you have read and agree to all the terms in the contract. Furthermore all parties must sign with the same instrument. When signing a document or agreement, putting your initials on all pages before the last page where your full name and signature is requested is a common practice. Initialing each page serves as a way to indicate that you have reviewed and agreed to the contents of the entire document. It helps to prevent any unauthorized modifications or substitutions of pages after you have signed the document. By initialing each page, you are essentially confirming your acceptance of the terms and conditions stated throughout the document. We are told to sign at the end, where the signature blocks are usually placed. Magicians use a variety of techniques, including psychology, misdirection, and sleight of hand, to create the illusion Now this brings us back to what Iona Victoria Campagnolo had said in her speech The Lieutenant Governor from 2001 -2007, was Iona Campagnolo. She was very wise and she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself from liability. She admitted that she did Not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whom she represented. Why? We have done some research on this as Dallas Hills as brought this to our attention over the last fifteen years. Dallas has also published videos on this important research. and produced numerous videos on the fact Queen Elizabeth never signed the Constitutional Act of 1982. Dallas Hills also has questioned Queen Victoria signing of this so important document that supposedly created the dominion called Canada. How could this be factual when their is NO SIGNITURE on the BNA Act, So in fact this is just more evidence that the entire de-facto government has never had any authority to govern let alone make any policies. Now with this evidence their is much confusion about Queen Victoria's role in signing the BNA Act of 1867. The British North America Act received Royal Assent on March 29, 1867, but it was not signed by Queen Victoria herself. It states that when the Governor General assents to a Bill in the Queen's Name, he sends an authentic copy of the Act, implying that the Governor General, not the Queen, signs the Act. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ And seem to suggest that Queen Victoria was involved in the process, but they don't explicitly state that she signed the Act. It's worth noting that provides the text of the Act, but it doesn't mention Queen Victoria's signature. So, to summarize, while Queen Victoria played a role in the process, there's no conclusive evidence to suggest that she personally signed the BNA Act of 1867. Now in regards to Queen Elizabeth this is all we have been able to find as an explanation. The Canada Act 1982, which was signed by Queen Elizabeth II at the top, but not at the bottom. This is an interesting exception to the typical convention of signing at the end of a document. In this case, the Queen's signature at the top of the document is known as a "broad seal," which is a formal way of authenticating a document in accordance with royal protocol. The broad seal is usually affixed to the top of the document, and it signifies the Queen's approval and authorization of the contents. So, while it might seem unusual to us, the Queen's signature at the top of the Canada Act 1982 is a deliberate choice that follows traditional royal protocol. If men and women accept this a a legal contract then they have been deceived again. The operative words here are “subject to section 59” of the Constitution Act. Now section 59 defers to section 23(of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is the language issue. So, the people of Quebec would have to agree that in their province, children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this is never going to fly. They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. So section 59/23 is the condition for which the Constitution Act of 1982 will come into force and effect" And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, there the Constitution Act. To add more facts the Meech Lake Accord of 1987 and the Charlottetown Accord of 1992. Both failed. Pierre Trudeau came out of retirement to oppose the Accord.as it would weaken federal power. Simple facts is there has been no ratification No matter what anyone says about Canada’s Constitution Act, it is sitting in limbo subject to section 59. Section 59 says, when 23 is satisfied, there has to be another Proclamation and this section has to be not only repealed, but disappeared. All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, so that takes us back to the Hudson Bay Charter. And the one who owns the Hudson Bay Charter is Queen Elizabeth II, or someone in her family. When she mentions the word "Canada" in her proclamation, The Queen is not talking about a country, she is talking about the Hudson Bay Corporation or charter. Who ever owns the Royal Charter corporation, owns all of the resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women of Canada. “Now Know You Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two.” The 1982 Constitution with its Bill of Rights never came into force. That is why, when you go into court and try to assert your freedom rights by way of the Constitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you just gave them jurisdiction. The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove too inflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name and connotations of the BNA/Constitution Act going all the way back to 1867. They want to pretend like the 1867 BNA Act was never there! And this new Constitution Act in 1982 has always been here, but it has not. Another interesting part of the Queen’s Proclamation is this: “Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.” Queen Elizabet is talking to two sets of people here, “my subjects” and “all others” who are not my subjects. You are free to not be my subject. You, who are outside my subjects, and still want to interact with this document, “whom these Presents may concern”, you must govern yourselves accordingly. This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are No laws, No government, No acts, No parliament, and No legislature. All there is, is whatever they can get with their Hudson Bay Charter. This show is complete! We always had the lawful unalienable Right for Self-determination. We can create our own Contract, Charter, Constitution that removes a de-facto system and replace with a de-jure system. THE ILLUSION vs JURISDICTIONS Please share so we may end this fraud!

Zoom 7 PM Alberta time daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09The de-facto system are Masquerading as a government , https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 The Great Canadian Illusion https://rumble.com/v6e4mrd-the-great-canadian-illusion.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp The Secret Life of Canada - You do Not Want to Miss This (Share https://rumble.com/v6au8a7-the-secret-life-of-canada-you-do-not-want-to-miss-this-share.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp Constitution of The Sovereign Republic of (Liberty) https://rumble.com/v6bfa1s-constitution-of-the-sovereign-republic-of-liberty.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp It has been 94 years since the Statute of Westminster changed the legal status of the provinces from that of united colonies of the British Empire to sovereign states. This legal fact is unknown by most Canadians and ignored by the "federal government" and it's appointees. Our time to embrace and exercise this legal autonomy is long overdue 94 years overdue. Walter F. Kuhl was an MP from Alberta from 1935-1949, he was a friend and constitutional student of R. Rogers Smith. Mr. Kuhl repeatedly introduced this information and solutions to the House and was mocked and ignored. This is a review of some of the material presented by Mr. Kuhl in his booklet: Canada a Country Without a Constitution published in 1977.

We have been deceived into believing that we have a lawful government and inherent rights in Canada. We actually have privileges granted to us by a illegitimate de-facto government.

People who speak the truth generally understand the stark nature of the situation. They know exactly what is going on and are not hesitant to relay it with as much blunt force as possible. We hate them the most simply because we don’t want to accept their answer. We know that they are right, and sometimes we are thinking the exact same thing, but for the most part, we don’t want to admit that the truth is the truth. Whenever you feel that unexplained hatred or disdain when that one dude speaks up, it probably due to the fact that the truth is hard for you to swallow, and you aren’t ready for it. Logically speaking, we should freaking love these types of people, as their answers can typically provide easy solutions to a lot of confusing scenarios, but our emotions, pride, and ego get in the way of rational thoughts and cloud our judgement, making us believe that the only possible reaction to such clarity is to assume the “you-don’t-know-what-you’re-talking-about-so-shut-up” whining response. Don’t hate these people; cherish them and be grateful that somebody has the courage to say what’s on everybody’s mind even though deep down inside, they know that someone is going to hate them for it. It takes a strong person to speak the truth, but it takes an even stronger person to accept it.

Down Wind, the truth about wind scam We hear searing, personal stories of people experiencing mysterious health problems, insomnia, depression, even thoughts of suicide. The film also reveals the staggering economic costs of the wind farms to taxpayers with huge subsidies going to big wind firms. Down Wind is the explosive documentary that examines Ontario's controversial rush into wind farm development. Produced by Surge Media, Down Wind exposes how this Canadian provinces' green energy dream turned into a nightmare for rural residents forced to live among the towering 50 storey turbines. We hear searing, personal stories of people experiencing mysterious health problems, insomnia, depression, even thoughts of suicide; their lives turned upside down by the constant noise and vibrations given off by the massive wind turbines. The documentary also reveals the staggering economic costs of these wind farms to taxpayers with huge subsidies going to big wind corporations. And how inside connections have made some government cronies wealthy, while rural communities suffer Down Wind – Wind Farm Documentary – Canada 2015 Down Wind is a 2015 Canadian documentary produced by Surge Media and aired on Sun News Network that investigates Ontario's accelerated development of industrial wind farms under the Green Energy Act, focusing on the adverse effects on rural communities. The film presents testimonies from residents experiencing health issues like insomnia, headaches, depression, and anxiety from turbine noise, infrasound, and shadow flicker, with some families relocating due to unlivable conditions. It also addresses economic burdens, including over $1 billion in annual taxpayer subsidies to wind corporations, perceived cronyism in contracts, and environmental drawbacks such as land disruption and intermittent energy output. Through interviews with affected individuals, experts, and officials, the 45-minute production critiques policy efficacy in emissions reduction and calls for greater setbacks and independent studies amid community protests.

The Secret Life of Canada - You do Not Want to Miss This (Share https://rumble.com/v6au8a7-the-secret-life-of-canada-you-do-not-want-to-miss-this-share.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=8846f3f3-fb7d-4ab5-8c2c-a01997f70c4e No Referendum Required: Our Legal Rights Under the Statute of Westminster Are Already Established https://rumble.com/v6sxlsn-no-referendum-required-our-legal-rights-under-the-statute-of-westminster-ar.html If Alberta truly wants an Independent Nation you MUST Share this Video https://rumble.com/v6synyt-if-alberta-truly-wants-an-independent-nation-you-must-share-this-video.html https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ FACTS https://constitutionalconventions.ca/category/historic-facts/ CANADAS HISTORY Mr. Kuhl’s final year serving as a politician, he brought forward Canada’s constitutional problems in the House of Commons. Here is the transcript of that entry. CANADA A COUNTRY WITHOUT A CONSTITUTION https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mr.-W.-F.-KUHL-Constitutional-Crisis.pdf Ho Canada Rogers Smith Many Known so Little About so Much HO, CANADA ! by R. Rogers Smith, https://constitutionalconventions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ho_Canada_Rogers_Smith.pdf Walter Kuhl: Canada A Country Without A Constitution https://rumble.com/v26rfc0-walter-kuhl-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=190dccaf-e206-4097-8978-7189b61e790d Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a CANADIANS NEED TO BE EDUCATED ABOUT CANADA’S HISTORY https://rumble.com/vv14sk-canadians-need-to-be-educated-about-canadas-history.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a No Treason The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner https://rumble.com/vwqbr8-no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority-by-lysander-spooner.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Do You Really Know The Fact About UNDRIP! https://rumble.com/v27vm2r-do-you-really-know-the-fact-about-undrip.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a The Queen's secrets eh? - Debunk This https://rumble.com/v26r4qw-the-queens-secrets-eh-debunk-this.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a R. R. Smith Alberta Has A Sovereign Right.... A Factual Examination of The Constitutional Problem https://rumble.com/v26r9sk-r.-r.-smith-alberta-has-a-sovereign-right....-a-factual-examination-of-the-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a EXTREME PRIORITY - EVERYONE MUST GET THIS MESSAGE https://rumble.com/v2buvv0-extreme-priority-everone-must-get-this-message-out.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration https://rumble.com/v2c4dpg-how-to-create-a-lawful-republic-administration.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Share this Video to Open their Eyes to Facts! https://rumble.com/v2uz93g-alberta-fires-update-time-to-restore-law.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Laura Nina was live From UK with Dallas Hills https://rumble.com/v3mhl7r-laura-nina-was-live-constitutional-conventions.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Martens - with important information (Share) https://rumble.com/v4aky5u-darcy-martans-with-important-information-share.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Proof of Claim obligated to pay Property tax, income tax and other taxes https://rumble.com/v4arclw-proof-of-claim-obligated-to-pay-property-tax-income-tax-and-other-taxes.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Pissed off Grama needs your Attention https://rumble.com/v4bklpi-pissed-off-grama-needs-your-attention.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a FACTS vs FICTION KNOW WHO OWNS THE LAND - Not canada or their corrupt piece of toilet paper https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Darcy Educates Truth Feb. 2024 https://rumble.com/v4i7iwo-darcy-educates-truth-feb.-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Edson Town Hall Education of FACTS on How You Are Truly Governed ! https://rumble.com/v4n50dh-edson-town-hall-education-of-facts-on-how-you-are-truly-governed-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a Create a nation within a hijacked land from Alberta or Canada Masquerading as a legit government https://rumble.com/v6kgt3m-create-a-nation-within-a-hijacked-land-from-alberta-or-canada-masquerading-.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a DECLARATION OF ALBERTA SOVEREIGNTY -Become involved in your local constitutional committee meetings https://rumble.com/v6szpql-declaration-of-alberta-sovereignty-become-involved-in-your-local-constituti.html?e9s=src_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_upp_a solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio this evening. The topic of discussion was the Statute of Westminster, 1931, and its implications on the land mass commonly referred to as "Canada." It was supposed to be a moderated debate, but we got blind sided a bit. First off, we appreciate that Marilyn took the time and accepted the invitation to the debate. Believe it or not, she is actually the first solicitor to have done so! Thank you, Marilyn. However, it quickly became obvious that Marilyn had an agenda - and that agenda was to attack, to discredit, and to smear. I had prepared my documents for a respectful debate and discussion of facts. I was not interested in a conversation that showed mostly disrespect and mockery while repeating legal opinions that have no standing in law. Sadly, Marilyn brought absolutely nothing of substance to the table. A few times, she diverted, distracted, and changed course abruptly - tactics that are used to confuse the audience so that the listener cannot follow along and forgets the actual topic of discussion. Clever! But I think quite a few people in the chat noticed that. Marilyn did not engage with highly important facts regarding sovereignty, land ownership, real constitutional documents such as the 1763 Letters Patent (not fake "constitutions" like the BNA Act) and the all-important definition of the Crown Office, the latter having been customary since the 16th century and backed up by numerous court cases (you'd think as a solicitor she'd know the court cases...). Instead, she kept repeating legal (legal = statutory, not based in law) opinions that are contradicted by the facts stated in the source documents. We wish her all the best with her referendum and her corporate, statutory (unlawful) plans to ensure that the People do not find out the truth. After all, in her capacity she must have sworn an Oath of Allegiance to none other than "His Majesty King Charles the Third, His heirs and successors" which in accordance with established legal doctrine, and confirmed in numerous court cases, is in fact none other than the Crown Office. :) Someone out there is starting to get scared of us and the facts that we have presented. Otherwise, they would not see the need to attack, mock and smear. Good! The best is yet to come! solicitor Marilyn Burns of http://www.youtube.com/@AlbertaUnfiltered on HHGRadio

Manifesto of October 1970 Source: “The FLQ Manifesto,” Marcel Rioux, Quebec in Question (1971), tr. James Boake; CopyLeft: Creative Commons (Attribute & ShareAlike) marxists.org 2004. Issued by the Front de Libération du Québec and read over CBC/Radio-Canada Oct. 8, 1970 as a condition for the release of kidnapped British trade official James Cross. Cross had been kidnapped on October 5 by the Libération cell of the FLQ, and among their demands for his release was the reading of this manifesto on TV and radio. Three days later the Chenier cell kidnapped Quebec’s Labor and Immigration minister, Pierre Laporte. Cross was released by his captors on December 3 when their hideout was discovered; the felquistes were flown to Cuba. Laporte was found dead in the trunk of a car on October 17. The people in the Front de Liberation du Québec are neither Messiahs nor modern-day Robin Hoods. They are a group of Quebec workers who have decided to do everything they can to assure that the people of Quebec take their destiny into their own hands, once and for all. The Front de Libération du Québec wants total independence for Quebeckers; it wants to see them united in a free society, a society purged for good of its gang of rapacious sharks, the big bosses who dish out patronage and their henchmen, who have turned Quebec into a private preserve of cheap labour and unscrupulous exploitation. The Front de Libération du Québec is not an aggressive movement, but a response to the aggression organized by high finance through its puppets, the federal and provincial governments (the Brinks farce, Bill 69, the electoral map, the so-called “social progress” tax, the Power Corporation, medical insurance — for the doctors, the guys at Lapalme...) The Front de Libération du Québec finances itself — through voluntary (sic) taxes levied on the enterprises that exploit the workers (banks, finance companies, etc....). “The money powers of the status quo, the majority of the traditional tutors of our people, have obtained from the voters the reaction they hoped for, a step backwards rather than the changes we have worked for as never before, the changes we will continue to work for.” (René Lévesque, April 29, 1970). Once, we believed it worthwhile to channel our energy and our impatience, in the apt words of René Lévesque, into the Parti Québécois, but the Liberal victory shows that what is called democracy in Quebec has always been, and still is, nothing but the “democracy” of the rich. In this sense the victory of the Liberal party is in fact nothing but the victory of the Simard-Cotroni election- fixers. Consequently, we wash our hands of the British parliamentary system; the Front de Libération du Québec will never let itself be distracted by the electoral crumbs that the Anglo-Saxon capitalists toss into the Quebec barnyard every four years. Many Quebeckers have realized the truth and are ready to take action. In the coming year Bourassa is going to get what’s coming to him: 100,000 revolutionary workers, armed and organized! Yes, there are reasons for the Liberal victory. Yes, there are reasons for poverty, unemployment, slums, for the fact that you, Mr. Bergeron of Visitation Street, and you too, Mr. Legendre of Ville de Laval, who make F10,000 a year, do not feel free in our country, Quebec. Yes, there are reasons, the guys who work for Lord know them, and so do the fishermen of the Gash, the workers on the North Shore; the miners who work for Iron Ore, for Québec Cartier Mining, for Noranda know these reasons too. The honest workingmen at Cabano, the guys they tried to screw still one more time, they know lots of reasons. Yes, there are reasons why you, Mr. Tremblay of Panet Street and you, Mr. Cloutier who work in construction in St. Jérôme, can’t afford “Golden Vessels” with all the jazzy music and the sharp decor, like Drapeau the aristocrat, the guy who was so concerned about slums that he had coloured billboards stuck up in front of them so that the rich tourists couldn’t see us in our misery. Yes, Madame Lemay of St. Hyacinthe, there are — reasons why you can’t afford a little junket to Florida like the rotten judges and members of Parliament who travel on our money. The good workers at Vickers and at Davie Shipbuilding, the ones who were given no reason for being thrown out, know these reasons; so do the guys at Murdochville that were smashed only because they wanted to form a union, and whom the rotten judges forced to pay over two million dollars because they had wanted to exercise this elementary right. The guys of Murdochville are familiar with this justice; they know lots of reasons. Yes, there are reasons why you, Mr. Lachance of St. Marguerite Street, go drowning your despair, your bitterness, and your rage in Molson’s horse piss. And you, the Lachance boy, with your marijuana cigarettes... Yes, there are reasons why you, the welfare cases, are kept from generation to generation on public assistance. There are lots of reasons, the workers for Domtar at Windsor and East Angus know them; the workers for Squibb and Ayers, for the Quebec Liquor Commission and for Seven-up and for Victoria Precision, and the blue collar workers of Laval and of Montreal and the guys at Lapalme know lots of reasons. The workers at Dupont of Canada know some reasons too, even if they will soon be able to express them only in English (thus assimilated, they will swell the number of New Quebeckers, the immigrants who are the darlings of Bill 69). These reasons ought to have been understood by the policemen of Montreal, the system’s muscle; they ought to have realized that we live in a terrorized society, because without their force and their violence, everything fell apart on October 7. We've had enough of a Canadian federalism which penalizes the dairy farmers of Quebec to satisfy the requirements of the Anglo-Saxons of the Commonwealth; which keeps the honest taxi drivers of Montreal in a state of semi-slavery by shamefully protecting the exclusive monopoly of the nauseating Murray Hill, and its owner — the murderer Charles Hershorn and his son Paul who, the night of October 7, repeatedly tore a .22 rifle out of the hands of his employees to fire on the taxi drivers and thereby mortally wounded Corporal Dumas, killed as a demonstrator. Canadian federalism pursues a reckless import policy, thereby throwing out of work the people who earn low wages in the textile and shoe industries, the most downtrodden people in Quebec, and all to line the pockets of a handful of filthy “money-makers” in Cadillacs. We are fed up with a federalism which classes the Quebec nation among the ethnic minorities of Canada. We, and more and more Quebeckers too, have had it with a government of pussy-footers who perform a hundred and one tricks to charm the American millionaires, begging them to come and invest in Quebec, the Beautiful Province where thousands of square miles of forests full of game and of lakes full of fish are the exclusive property of these all-powerful lords of the twentieth century. We are sick of a government in the hands of a hypocrite like Bourassa who depends on Brinks armoured trucks, an authentic symbol of the foreign occupation of Quebec, to keep the poor Quebec “natives” fearful of that poverty and unemployment to which we are so accustomed. We are fed up with the taxes we pay that Ottawa’s agent in Quebec would give to the English-speaking bosses as an “incentive” for them to speak French, to negotiate in French. Repeat after me: “Cheap labour is main d'oeuvre à bon marché in French.” We have had enough of promises of work and of prosperity, when in fact we will always be the diligent servants and bootlickers of the big shots, as long as there is a Westmount, a Town of Mount Royal, a Hampstead, an Outremont, all these veritable fortresses of the high finance of St. James Street and Wall Street; we will be slaves until Quebeckers, all of us, have used every means, including dynamite and guns, to drive out these big bosses of the economy and of politics, who will stoop to any action however base, the better to screw us. We live in a society of terrorized slaves, terrorized by the big bosses, Steinberg, Clark, Bronfman, Smith, Neopole, Timmins, Geoffrion, J.L. Lévesque, Hershorn, Thompson, Nesbitt, Desmarais, Kierans (next to these, Rémi Popol the Nightstick, Drapeau the Dog, the Simards’ Simple Simon and Trudeau the Pansy are peanuts!). We are terrorized by the Roman Capitalist Church, though this is less and less true today (who owns the square where the Stock Exchange was built?); terrorized by the payments owing to Household Finance, by the advertising of the grand masters of consumption, Eaton’s, Simpson’s, Morgan’s, Steinberg’s, General Motors — terrorized by those exclusive clubs of science and culture, the universities, and by their boss-directors Gaudry and Dorais, and by the vice-boss Robert Shaw. There are more and more of us who know and suffer under this terrorist society, and the day is coming when all the Westmounts of Quebec will disappear from the map. Workers in industry, in mines and in the forests! Workers in the service industries, teachers, students and unemployed! Take what belongs to you, your jobs, your determination and your freedom. And you, the workers at General Electric, you make your factories run; you are the only ones able to produce; without you, General Electric is nothing! Workers of Quebec, begin from this day forward to take back what is yours; take yourselves what belongs to you. Only you know your factories, your machines, your hotels, your universities, your unions; do not wait for some organization to produce a miracle. Make your revolution yourselves in your neighbourhoods, in your places of work. If you don’t do it yourselves, other usurpers, technocrats or someone else, will replace the handful of cigar-smokers we know today and everything will have to be done all over again. Only you are capable of building a free society. We must struggle not individually but together, till victory is obtained, with every means at our disposal, like the Patriots of 1897-1898 (those whom Our Holy Mother Church hastened to excommunicate, the better to sell out to British interests). In the four corners of Quebec, may those who have been disdainfully called lousy Frenchmen and alcoholics begin a vigorous battle against those who have muzzled liberty and justice; may they put out of commission all the professional holdup artists and swindlers: bankers, businessmen, judges and corrupt political wheeler-dealers. ... We are Quebec workers and we are prepared to go all the way. With the help of the entire population, we want to replace this society of slaves by a free society, operating by itself and for itself, a society open on the world. Our struggle can only be victorious. A people that has awakened cannot long be kept in misery and contempt. Long live Free Quebec! Long live our comrades the political prisoners! Long live the Quebec Revolution! Long live the Front de Libération du Québec!

FLQ was a PSYOP + Alberta Prosperity Project is just a repeat of the FLQ -Slaves used to push the Zionist Jew Lenin manifesto -Same as the PSYOP of the Convoy with Tamara Lich the Bitch

The Secret Life of Canada - You do Not Want to Miss This (Share https://rumble.com/v6au8a7-the-secret-life-of-canada-you-do-not-want-to-miss-this-share.html Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution https://rumble.com/v6ave1j-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html Canada the Illusion - Part 1 https://rumble.com/v6atf1p-canada-the-illusion-part-1.html Canada History https://constitutionalconventions.ca/category/canadas-history/ Letter to Rene Levesque Addressing Quebec’s Will To Separate https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2021/01/19/letter-to-rene-levesque-addressing-quebecs-will-to-separate/ 1786 – 1841: Governor Generals of the “Province of Canada https://constitutionalconventions.ca/?s=1878+ 1868: Rupert’s Land Act https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1868-ruperts-land-act/ 1893: Statute Law Revisions Act (UK) – Removal of Sec. 2 of the BNA act, legally removing the Monarchy from Canada https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/17/1893-statute-law-revisions-act-uk-removal-of-sec-2-of-the-bna-act-legally-removing-the-monarchy-from-canada/ Ho Canada Rogers Smith https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2021/01/20/ho-canada-rogers-smith/ https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://constitutionalconventions.ca/category/historic-facts/ https://rumble.com/v6ziduu-canada-the-illusion-updated-and-reworked.html 1759: Battle of Quebec: the Plains of Abraham between France and England https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1759-battle-of-quebec-the-plains-of-abraham-between-france-and-england/ Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada Corporation is FALSE! So, when you refer to them as rights you are DECEIVING YOURSELF and others, TEACHING THEM FALSE information. THE Charter of rights has never been ratified and is not in play: Section 58 & 59 & 23.1 a Section 23.1a refers to language laws in Quebec, if authorized into law this would give parents legal rights to educate their children in the language of their choice. (Must be satisfied first to be ratified). (Has never been satisfied by Quebec). Section 58 & 59 must be repealed and replaced. This proved that the so-called charter of rights has never been ratified and that we sovereigns have no rights its proven right here. Something you should all ponder and wonder why the leaders and politicians do not tell you the truth. Part 7 section 58 Section 58: commencement Subject to section 59, this act shall come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that introduces a subject that needs to be satisfied, Satisfied meaning discharge of an obligation) Section 59: commencement of paragraph 23(1) (a) in respect of Quebec (1) Paragraph 23(1(a) shall come into force in respect of Quebec on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the introduction of the subject and refers you to the specific section that needs to be satisfied) (2) Authorization of Quebec A proclamation under subsection 1 shall be issued only where authorized by the legislative assembly or government of Quebec (This means that Subsection 1 can only be satisfied by the sitting government of Quebec) (3) Repeal of this section This section may be repealed on the day paragraph 23(1)(a) comes into force in respect of Quebec and this act amended and renumbered, consequentially upon the repeal of this section by proclamation issued by the queen or the governor general under the great seal of Canada (This is the section that says that once all the subjects have been satisfied, section 59 will be repealed, and a new proclamation will be made to bring the charter into force) Section 23(1) Citizens of Canada (a)Whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside ... have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province (This is the section that says that if your first language is English, the province must provide you with primary and secondary education in English) Part 1 Section 32 Application of Charter (1) This charter applies (a) To the parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (This section covers parliament and government employees) (b) To the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province (This section covers parliament and government employees provincially) Exemption (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force (This section states that section 15 (Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law) needs three years of charter ratification before it can come into play) Section 24 Enforcement of Guaranteed Rights and Freedoms (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances (This section means that anyone who is covered in the application section has a right to seek justice) Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all these circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. (This section protects anyone covered in the application section from having their rights infringed upon during an investigation and/or trial) Learn More https://consitutionalconventions.ca

Who or What Constitutes "The Crown"

Canada The Great Illusion By: Jason Gray The greatest trick ever pulled on the Canadian people wasn’t taxation. It wasn’t carbon credits. It wasn’t even the Emergencies Act. It was the illusion of sovereignty. Canada, for all its democratic rituals and talk of freedom, is not a free nation. Canada, for all its democratic rituals and talk of freedom, is not a free nation. It is a colony dressed in red and white, performing independence in a theatre built by its original architects, the British Crown. The script has never changed. Only the actors have. If you want proof, you don’t have to dig through classified documents or hidden treaties. All you have to do… is listen. The Oath of Office: The Words They Hope You Never Notice Search “Mark Carney oath of office.” Watch the video. Listen carefully, not to the performance, but to the allegiance. Does he swear to serve the people of Canada? No. He swears allegiance to the King of England. This is not ceremonial. This is not symbolic. This is contractual. Every single Member of Parliament, every senator, every judge, every cabinet minister swears not to serve the people, but to uphold the authority of the Crown. So ask yourself this: If Canada were a sovereign, autonomous, democratic nation, why is its leadership required to swear allegiance to a foreign monarch? Why must they ask permission from the Governor General, the Crown’s representative, to dissolve Parliament and call an election? Why are there Lieutenant Governors, also Crown agents in every single province? Why is the King’s face stamped on all Canadian coins? Why do lawyers still hold the title King’s Counsel? Why are you tried in the Court of King’s Bench? The real truth is not hidden. It’s encoded into everything. Canada is not a free country. It is a legal fiction. A managed colony. A population pacified by pageantry. *****Constitutional Theatre***** In 1982, Pierre Trudeau famously “patriated” the Constitution. Even that word, patriated, was a sleight of hand. Canada did not throw off the shackles of the monarchy. It merely adopted a more elegant leash. The British North America Act still echoes in every law. The Governor General still holds “reserve powers” that can override elected officials. The Prime Minister, no matter how progressive or powerful they appear, is still a subject of the Crown, not a servant of the people. The Charter? It begins with this phrase: “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law…” But whose law? Not yours. Not ours. The Crown’s. The Crown is Not Just England, It Is Empire Understand this: The Crown is not a person. It is a system. It is a supra-national legal and financial construct that operates beyond borders. It owns land, dictates law, and influences banking structures globally. It is what allows the World Economic Forum, the IMF, and the UN to operate through proxy leadership, because the colonial infrastructure was never dismantled. It was digitized. Canada’s MPs may wear suits instead of sashes, but their oaths remain colonial. The people? They cheer for different parties, not realizing all sides serve the same throne. *****The Illusion of Choice***** Every few years, Canadians are told to vote. Red or blue. Conservative or Liberal. Freedom or control. This theatre masks the truth. Every candidate on that stage has already pledged loyalty to the same monarch. The deeper truth? The monarch is not in control either. The Crown is not a man. It is a machine. Canada, A Nation That Never Broke Its Chains Their are No difference between America and Canada? In 1776, Americans declared their independence, and they are also owned by the same crown Americana and Canadians are living in an illusion In 1867, Canadians were granted a status by the Crown, and never left the table. America rejected monarchy. Canada rebranded it. Now, this age of soft totalitarianism, digital ID, ESG scores, and biometric surveillance, the Crown lives on, not as a king with a sword, but as a system that governs minds. Canada is its testing ground. *****A Nation in Deep Sleep***** There are portraits of the King in provincial legislatures. His initials on the lapels of judges. His crown above your legal documents. His agents above your elected officials. His image on your coins, your courts, your laws. This is not freedom. This is the most well-crafted illusion of the modern world. the saddest part? Most Canadians don’t even know they’re still subjects.

Canada just elected Mark Carney, the architect of the carbon tax. Australia followed days later with their own left-leaning majority. What’s going on? In this video, I break down the shocking similarities between Canada and Australia’s recent elections — both voting in socialist-leaning governments within days of each other. But it doesn’t stop there… Mark Carney is now trying to act like a Conservative, saying he wants to “build energy corridors” and “work with all provinces” — while conveniently ignoring the fact he spent years punishing companies over carbon emissions. I also cover Pierre Poilievre’s dramatic return after losing his seat. Many thought he was gone, but he’s been given a safe riding and will be back in Parliament this fall — just in time for Carney’s fall parliament session to begin. Get your popcorn ready. Something bigger is going on here. And it’s not a coincidence. If you’re tired of media spin and globalist narratives, hit that Subscribe button and join the conversation. Share this video, leave a comment, and stay ahead of the curve. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7VVQLyh_Vc

To understand why the BNA Act and the Canadian Federation is FAKE here is a quick, nutshell explanation of how and who properly creates constitutions and sovereign democratic countries. The "infamous socialist agenda" The creation of a democratic nation is for sane people simply a matter of common sense and decency; for the established elites it's a leading cause of apoplexy and a matter of subversion, terrorism and communism...if not downright chaotic. But assuming that a sovereign democratic federation is socially desirable - in other words, liberal rhetoric transformed into actual reality – no supernatural abilities or special law degrees are necessary to create it. It requires merely a public consensus about the purpose of the nation and how to best achieve it. a) First, there has to be a territory (like a Canadian province) whose people desire to be a sovereign and democratic nation. b) From among themselves the people select, by vote or appointment, a temporary assembly and charge it with the formulation of a constitution. c) The assembly to the people for review and public debate, to provide an opportunity for changes, submits a first draft of the constitution. d) After a first public debate the assembly retires to work out the changes, after which it is submitted again to the people for review and further changes, if necessary. e) This process is repeated until the constitution has become a formula acceptable to a substantial majority of the people. f) Now the people vote in a referendum to accept (or reject) the constitution with a pre-determined majority (95% for example). g) If the required majority cannot be achieved, further changes must be made until the formula becomes acceptable to the required number of people. h) The entire process is recorded and documented as proof of the constitution's authority. i) On the basis of the constitution a government is then formed, which is contractually bound (Constitution is the contract) to respect it and conduct itself in accord with it. j) Now this sovereign nation can form a federation with other nations, if it wishes to do so. Note; that no consideration has been given to the manipulative interference from privately owned media monopolies. Note; that the constitution is created first, then the government. To create a democratic nation for the people, by the people, of the people, it cannot be any other way. Note; no foreign government can formulate (or create) the constitution of another country. It has to be created by the people themselves and becomes thus, for all intents and purposes, their protective property. It's not only the law but is a contract, which subjugates the government to the people. The government derives a limited authority to govern from it, always subject to the people's authority.

Here are 11 very important questions that you need to ask yourself: For Canadians, the answers to the following questions should be common knowledge as the content should have been mandatory learning in our education system. There is a reason it is not, and Constitutional Conventions will expose all of this. “There are two ways to be fooled. One is doing No research and the other is to repeat the regurgitated indoctrination to repeat the history of Lies” Dallas K Hills So… here are 11 very important questions that you need to ask yourself: Where are the Articles of Confederation, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? Why was Canada known as the “Dominion of Canada” a British colony until 1938, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? Why in 1867 was the BNA act created to be Letters Patent for a Governor General to the Dominion of Canada if Canada had confederated and is a sovereign nation? Why in 1893, would the British Parliament deem it necessary to repeal certain sections of the BNA act, with the “Statute Law Revisions act” if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? Why in 1931 would the British parliament create the “Statute of Westminster” to nullify the Dominion of Canada, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? Why in 1946 did a foreign Monarch, King George VI appoint a representative for the UK, a Governor General and then command the Parliament of Canada to create Letters Patent and command the PM at that time to sign on his behalf those Letters Patent in 1947 for his Governor General, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a Sovereign Nation? Why did PM Trudeau in 1982 have the government create the “Canada Bill” and then take that Bill to a foreign Monarch and have her parliament pass that Bill as the “Canada act, 1982” if Canada confederated 153 years earlier and is a sovereign nation? Why do Prime Ministers and other officials when sworn into office here in Canada, swear their allegiance to a foreign monarch, Queen Elizabeth, and not to the people of Canada if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? If Canada is a sovereign nation, why does the Government of Canada in their Interpretations act define Canada as the internal waters and territorial seas if Canada confederated in 1867? Why in the “Constitution act, 1867” of Canada is there no clause that allows for land for the Government of Canada to become a sovereign nation if Canada Confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation? If the Sovereigns in the 12 sovereign nations (Provinces and Territories all have Act they refer to as Constitution Act) could awaken to what the Government of Canada Inc. really is (master that owns them upon their ignorance and consent) and take the blinders off put there by those who call themselves the government, we could all have a bright future. “Constitutional Conventions has the Solution to actually do this! Your Invited, together we will correct the false History” – Dallas K Hills The Government of Canada Inc. has painted itself as some religious fairy tales set out to save everyone and keep them safe. Once people realize the truth and claim ownership over their land, they can truly be free. Let us help you see the truth, at Constitutional Conventions website. “You never change things by fighting in their existing corrupt System. To change something, build a Solution that makes the existing corrupt system obsolete” – Dallas K Hills These are historical Facts to educate Canadians the Solution to end the Lie, and establish a True Sovereign Nation with Liberty , Freedom , Prosperity, Property Rights, and Land Rights. Join the Solution – Share to Family and Friends

Canadians need to be educated about Canada’s history – this is absolutely key if the people of the Canadian provinces have any chance of taking control of their lives and what belongs to them. To understand where we are, we must first understand how we got here… Deep research has unearthed key events, which have both created and hidden the truth of what Canada is, and how you are governed. (Under a Dictatorship unaccountable to We The People) Event: From the 1700s into the next century, England and France were tense partners representing both Upper and Lower Canada. General Wolfe’s death in the final battle on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, secured victory for England, the prize ultimately known as, ‘Canada INC ’. The Treaty of Paris joined the formerly British controlled Upper Canada with France’s Lower Canada into the French legal entity – a Corporation Sole, the ‘Province of Quebec’. The amalgamation process from 1759 through 1763 seated the first British Governor General within that Corporation Sole, which in 1787 amalgamated all of ‘Canada’ enabling Britain to seat a Governor General to rule over their Colonies known then as: the ‘Province of Canada’ and New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. For 80 years between 1787 and 1867, the British placed many Governors General into the Corporation Sole. Issuing Letters Patent, the British Monarchy thereby proclaimed that Governor Generals held the ‘power’ to create and control the government of Canada, as a British Colony. Event: Delegates from Canada had no part in drafting the British North America Act, March 29, 1867, and no certified copy of this act was brought back to Canada by the delegates. The Act was drafted by Lord Thring, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. It is not a Constitution for it constitutes nothing. It simply emphasizes the power of the Governor-General to appoint and remove a Privy Council to ‘aid and advise’ him and to state that the Governor-General has the power to pass an ‘order-in-council’ by himself individually as the case requires. ( An ‘order-in-council’ is equal to an Act of Parliament.) One score and two years later the Interpretations Act, 1889, was passed, stating that Canada is a Colony. This gives the lie to the story of Confederation and brands it as a reductio ad absurdum. ( disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion (the carrying of something to an absurd extreme) Another recent absurdity is that a House and Senate of British Subjects debating the adoption of a Flag and Anthem. You say you have never heard of this before! You are not alone in this. The ‘Dominion of Canada’ meant the British Empire would retain their prize, the Governor General was then able to control all of Canada. John A. MacDonald, knighted as Sir John A., was ultimately a traitor to the people he represented in Canada. Joining the British mainland colonies, they created the Dominion – Canada East, now Quebec; Canada West, now Ontario; along with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Event: The year, 1868. Through their Royal Charter established in 1670 by King Charles 2nd, the privately held Hudson’s Bay Company employed land usage west of Quebec and Ontario, then known as Rupert’s Land. In 1868, British Parliament created the ‘Rupert’s Land Act’ to allow the Hudson’s Bay Company to sell use-of-land back to the Monarch, Queen Victoria. The following year, Hudson’s Bay Company finalized the transaction by signing the “Deed of Surrender”. In 1871 Queen Victoria transferred the use of those lands to the ‘Dominion of Canada’, operated by the Governor General to settle the land and create the western provinces, the allodial title would be held by the Court in Chancery for the British Empire until 1931. Event: The year, 1901. With Queen Victoria’s death, the repeal of Section 2 of the BNA Act came into force, deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of Section 2 has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria. Event: The year, 1931. British Parliament passed the ‘Statute of Westminster’ allowing their Dominions to act independently. This would allow the said Dominions to federate and create their own Constitutions. Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa did – Canada did not. Why didn’t Canada federate? What does it really mean for us as “Canadians” today? Follow the money… to learn how certain forces active even today, were determined not to surrender their cherished positions of power. Continuing by way of deception, these forces kept alive the illusion of ‘Canadian Confederation’ and ‘Sovereignty’. This deliberate illusion continued throughout various iterations of the BNA Act, later called the “Constitution Acts” of 1940, 43, 49, 60, 65, 74, 75 and finally, 1982. Event: The year, 1946. King George VI appointed a Governor General to Canada. In 1947, he commanded the Parliament of Canada to create a commission to write Letters Patent for his Governor General, he then commanded Prime Minister Mackenzie King to sign the new “Letters Patent” on his behalf. The letters patent references the BNA act, 1867 “Letters Patent” enabling the Governor General to give Royal assent to the Income Tax act 1948. The Governor General sits in Ottawa and his Lieutenant Governors sit in each of the provinces – to report not to you the people, but to the “Queen in Right of Canada”. Today some statutes created by the various provincial governments or the Federal government receive Royal Accent, the positions of Lt. Governor ., GG and Queen of Canada are simply fictional figureheads with No standing in law. Event: 1952 the Royal Styles and Titles act is created by the Parliament of Canada for the Queen of Canada, yes that’s correct the Queen of Canada proclaims through this act, to be the Queen of Canada, not joking. This should clear up any wonder over why at the inauguration ceremony of 2019, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and all elected members swore allegiance – hand-upon-Bible – to the Queen of Canada and not to the People of Canada. You may now have realized why. But wait, how does this work… according to the Statutes Law Revisions Act of 1893, Section 2 of the BNA act, 1867 was repealed, so what Queen? It’s time to discover the far-reaching impact against all of us! Event: The year, 1982. To prevent people from discovering the illusion, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Cabinet created the ‘Canada Bill’, delivering directly to the self-styled ‘Queen of Canada’, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, for her delivery of it to the British Parliament to thereby pass it as the “Canada Act”, 1982. Trudeau would “patriate” the defunct BNA act 1867, to Canada – a photocopy, the original still residing in the UK Parliamentary Archives. Upon returning, Trudeau convinced all provinces to ratify the deception of the new ‘Constitution’. This was of the utmost of importance, without the provinces ratifying this Act of a foreign parliament it could not become Supreme Law (Law of the Sea) here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. All the provinces with the exception of Quebec signed off. Their problem, the Constitution Act was NOT ratified and has NO standing here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. The outcome of this adventure saw Trudeau retiring from politics, leaving his mess behind to be sorted out by future politicians. To ensure the deception was laid to rest, the “Government of Canada” knew they needed to amend ‘The Constitution Act, 1982’. There was the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, followed five years later by the Charlottetown Accord. These accords failed and the “Government of Canada” did not get what it wanted. As both Accords failed, the federal authority in 1995 let sleeping dogs lie, pretending everything was as it should be. After all, the people of Canada had yet to figure it out. Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation. “Constitutional Conventions” is the Solution to create an accountable government for the People by The People. These fascinating hidden truths will be revealed. Join The Solution, plenty to learn. SOVEREIGN FOREVER SHARE, LIKE

Spruce Grove, Alta., R.R. I, November 23rd, 1976. The Hon. Rene Levesque, Premier-elect, Province of Quebec, Quebec, P.Q. Dear Mr. Levesque: Congratulations on your magnificent personal victory and that of your Parti Quebecois in the recent Quebec election. As a student of Canadian constitutional history and of Canadian constitutional problems for some 40 years, I am tremendously interested in the constitutional implications of your recent political victory. For 14 years, from 1935 to 1949, it was my privilege to serve as a member of the House of Commons, from the province of Alberta. The withholding of assent to some Alberta legislation in those years by the Lieutenant-Governor and the disallowance of other Alberta legislation by the people at Ottawa, set me to investigating how these things could be. I was assisted in my studies by R. Rogers Smith, who was personally acquainted with a onetime private secretary to John A. MacDonaId at the time when the B.N.A. Act was being enacted. Through this source I have become acquainted with much information concerning the history of the B.N.A. Act which is not to be found in text books. All this information has led me to the conclusion that the existing constitutional circumstances are shocking to the point of unbelief. However, in my considered opinion, after 40 years of intensive study, these existing constitutional circumstances are of such a nature that they can be of extreme advantage to you in governing your province. I am enclosing copies of some of the addresses which I delivered in the House of Commons on the subject, as well as copies of a pamphlet by Mr. Smith, dealing with the same subject. If you have not already been made acquainted with this material, I trust it will prove enlightening and helpful to you in the constitutional considerations in which you obviously are going to become involved. Although the enclosed material should give you a clear outline of what I conceive to be your present standing constitutionally as a province, 1 would like to give you a brief summary of what I believe to be your present position. So far as separation. is concerned, rather than it being necessary to seek separation rights through a referendum, THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC IS ALREADY COMPLETELY CONSTITUTIONALLY SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF CANADA ! ! ! ! This is equally true of every other province in Canada and has been so since December 11, 1931, through the Statute of Westminster. HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED? In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit. As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully. I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province. The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated: 1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union. 2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union. 3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union. 4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union. 5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions. 6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony. The privilege of federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada. 7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as agent of the Imperial Parliament. 8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government. HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED? In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit. As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully. I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province. The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated: 1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union. 2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union. 3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union. 4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union. 5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions. 6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony. The privilege of federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada. 7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as agent of the Imperial Parliament. 8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government. HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED? In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit. As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully. I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province. The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated: 1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union. 2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union. 3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union. 4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union. 5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions. 6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony. The privilege of federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada. 7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as agent of the Imperial Parliament. 8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government. 9. The privilege of federating became realizable for the provinces of Canada, only through the enactment of the Statute of Westminster on December 11, 1931. Through this statute, the Imperial Parliament relinquished to the people of Canada their sovereign rights, and through them to their Provincial governments as their most direct agents. 10. Since December 11, 1931, the Provinces of Canada have not acted on their newly acquired status in the forming of a Federal Union, nor have the people of Canada ratified a constitution. Therefore, the original proposition, namely: that all power to govern in Canada resides at the moment, with the Provinces of Canada; and, that all power legally remains there until such time as the Provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution whereby they may delegate such powers as they wish to a central government of their own creation. In the meantime, Canada exists as ten political units without a political superior. Should you consider that there is merit in the information, which I have given you, I would be very happy to meet with you personally to discuss in greater depth the implications of the unprecedented constitutional circumstances prevailing in Canada. Yours for a better Canada, Walter F. Kuhl [Member of Parliament for Jasper-Edson, 1935-1949]

Delivered in the House of Commons on Thursday, November 8, 1945 A Distinctive National Flag and Constitutional Problems in Canada Mr. W. F. KUHL (Jasper-Edson): This resolution urges the expediency of Canada's possessing a distinctive national flag. I agree that an anomaly exists with respect to the matter of a Canadian flag, and I, and my associates in parliament are in favour of removing this condition. But personally I consider that under the constitutional conditions prevailing in this country at the moment such action is premature. There are other and more important actions to be taken before it is appropriate to adopt a new flag. The flag question is just one of the many anomalies which exist in Canada's constitutional position. Some of these have' been referred to this afternoon. One of them, the matter of Canadian citizenship is intended to be dealt with at this session. There are others, such as amendments to the constitution, appeals to the Privy Council, the power of disallowance, the matter of a federal district proper - and doubtless there are others. All these anomalies ought to be dealt with, and I am personally in favour of dealing with them at the earliest possible opportunity. But I consider that the present piecemeal method is improper as well as undemocratic. I contend that the people of Canada are not being consulted in the manner in which I believe they ought to be concerning their rights in these questions. To Account For Anomalies I wish to indicate, Mr. Speaker, my reasons for contending that the method that is proposed to attempt to remove these anomalies is improper and undemocratic. Then I wish to indicate what I consider to be the proper method to use. To do this I first wish to endeavor to, account for the constitutional circumstances in which we find ourselves at the moment. The question, which must occur to every hon. member of this house and to every other citizen in this country, is why do such anomalies exist in our constitutional position? How did they come about? There must be something in Canada's constitutional history that accounts for the circumstances in which we find ourselves. No other part of the British Empire finds itself in the same circumstances. Why are these conditions peculiar to the people of Canada? In endeavoring to answer these questions, and in suggesting what I consider to be the proper remedy for them, I am not posing as a constitutional expert, although I may say it is now ten years since I began my studies on this subject, and I trust, I shall not be considered presumptuous in claiming to have added a little to my knowledge in that time. It is my desire to see the people of Canada consulted where their fundamental rights are concerned. I wish to see government of the people by the people. These are the motives, which actuate me in what I have to say on this resolution. In presenting the special case I am about to discuss I am not necessarily speaking as a member of the Social Credit group; I am speaking as a native of Canada. The matters on which I am to speak are of fundamental concern to every citizen of Canada regardless of his or her political persuasion. They are among the most serious matters upon which a citizen can be called to think; they are the bedrock considerations of human government. Basic Premises In order to endeavor to account for the contradictions in Canada's constitutional position and to suggest a remedy therefore, I wish to lay down some fundamental premises on which I shall base my entire argument. Locke is credited with saying: “Men being by nature all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate and subjected to the power of another without his consent. The only way whereby anyone divests himself of his natural liberty and puts on the bonds of civil society is by agreeing with other men to join and unite into a community.” Jefferson, in the declaration of independence states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men arc created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights: that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Federal Union Defined In addition to that promise, I wish to indicate the definition of a federal union. What is a federal union? Bouvier in his law dictionary defines "federal government" as: “A union or confederation of sovereign states, created either by treaty, or by the mutual adoption of a federal constitution.” Doctor Olivier, joint law clerk of the House of Commons, on page 85 of the report of the special committee on the British North America Act, said: “A confederation is a union of independent and sovereign states bound together by a pact or a treaty for the observance of certain conditions dependent upon the unanimous consent of the contracting parties, who are free to withdraw from the union." A. P. Newton, in his book entitled "Federal and Unified Constitutions," at page 5 says: “A federal state is a perpetual union of several sovereign states based first upon a treaty between those states or upon some historical status common to them all, and secondly upon a federal constitution accepted by their citizens.” Two points stand out prominently in these definitions. The first is that the states, which form the union, must be sovereign, free and independent before they federate; the second, that the federal constitution, which forms the basis of the union, must be accepted by the citizens of the federating states. I think it worthwhile in this connection to point out that when the states of Australia federated, the people of Australia were provided with two opportunities of voting on their constitution. I should like to quote a paragraph from a history of the Australian constitution by Quick and Garran. This paragraph is on the meaning of the words "have agreed" in the constitution, and it states “These words make distinct and emphatic reference to the consensus of the people arrived at through the procedure, in its various successive stages, prescribed by the substantially similar enabling acts adopted by the legislatures of the concurring colonies. In four of the colonies acts were passed enabling the people to take part in the framing and the acceptance or rejection of a federal constitution for Australia. Through those acts the people agreed, first to send representatives to a federal convention charged with duty of framing for Australia a federal constitution under the Crown in the form of a bill for enactment by the Imperial Parliament, and, secondly, they agreed to pronounce their judgment upon the constitution at a referendum, which in each colony was arranged to follow the convention. In all the colonies, the constitution was eventually referred to the people. At this referendum, each voter was eligible to vote by ballot "yes" or "no" on the question asked on the ballot paper, "Are you in favour of the proposed federal constitution?" In this manner, there was, in four colonies, a popular initiative and finally in all the colonies a popular ratification of the constitution, which is thus legally the work, as it will be for all time, the heritage of the Australian people. This democratic method of establishing a new form of government may be contrasted with the circumstances and conditions under which other federal constitutions became law. Federal Union Desired in 1867 Now I should like to ask a few questions concerning our position in Canada. Did the provinces of Canada desire federal union? The Quebec resolutions, the London resolutions, and the draft of the bill by the London delegates all indicate that the provinces of Canada desired federal union. The preamble to the Quebec resolutions reads: “The best interests and present and future prosperity of British North America will be promoted by a federal union under the Crown.” Clause 70 of the Quebec resolutions indicates that whatever agreement was arrived at by the delegates would be submitted to the provinces for their approval. It reads: “The sanction of the imperial and local parliaments shall be sought for the union of the provinces, on the principles adopted by the conference.” Furthermore, a bill drafted in London by the Canadian delegates contains the same preamble that appears in the Quebec resolutions, and this draft bill also contains a repealing clause which hon. members can find on page 179 of Pope's "Confederation Documents". It reads: "From and after the union, all acts and parts of acts passed by the Parliament of Great Britain, the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Legislature of Upper Canada, the Legislature of Lower Canada, the Legislature of Canada, the Legislature of Nova Scotia, or the Legislature of New Brunswick, which are repugnant to or inconsistent with the provisions of this act shall be and the same are hereby repealed." Canada Not Federated Under B.N.A. Act The next question is: Did Canada becomes a federal union under the British North America Act. I submit that the manner in which the bill was drafted and the manner in which it was enacted throw much light on the answer to this question. The law officers of the Crown attached to the colonial office drafted the act. Lord Carnarvon, Secretary of State for the colonies was the chairman of the conference. Sir Frederick Rogers, Under-secretary for the colonies, in Lord Blachford's Letters, is quoted as saying at page 301: “They held many meetings at which I was always present. Lord Carnarvon was in the chair, and I was rather disappointed in his power of presidency.” In reading accounts of the times, it is quite obvious that the bill, which was drafted by the colonial office, seems to have prevailed over that which was drafted by the delegate from Canada. The title and preamble of the bill drafted by the Colonial Office read: “The union of the British North American colonies, and for the government of the united colony. Whereas the union of the British North American colonies for the purposes of government and legislation would he attended with great benefits to the colonies and be conducive to the interests of the United Kingdom; -“ That is the preamble of the draft bill submitted by the colonial office, whereas the preamble of the bill drafted by the Canadian delegates read: “Whereas the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have expressed their desire to form a federal union under the British Crown for the purpose of government and legislation, based upon the principles of the British constitution;” I submit, Mr. Speaker, no evidence is to be found to show that the preamble, which we find in the printed copies of the British North America Act in Canada, was either discussed or proven in the British Parliament. This preamble reads: “Whereas the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have expressed there desire to be federally united into one dominion-“ Lord Carnarvon, who introduced the bill on February 19, 1867, used these words as reported at page 559 of the British Hansard: “The bill opens by reciting the desire of the several provinces to be federally united.” Furthermore Lord Campbell, speaking to the bill on February 26 of the same year, is reported at page 1012 of the British Hansard as having said: "The bill is founded, I believe, on what is termed the Quebec scheme of 1864. When the resolution, which alone engages the Nova Scotian Parliament, was in debate, its whole tenor, as our papers show, were against that project. The leader of the government was understood distinctly to renounce it. Our rights indeed may be imperfect upon this part of the subject, and I will not dwell upon it. But one thing is clear the preamble of the resolution comes before us in full and perfect authenticity. The preamble lays down the expediency of confederating British North America." I submit it should be evident from these quotations that the preamble, which was discussed, was that to be found in the Quebec resolutions, not the one we find in the printed copies of the British North America Act in Canada. A pertinent question to ask at this point would be: When was the present preamble placed in the British North America Act? Why was it not discussed in the British Parliament, and, furthermore, what is the significance of an act bearing a preamble which was not even discussed, let alone proven? Another point of significance in connection with this, I believe, is the undue haste with which the bill was passed through the Imperial Parliament. When second reading was called for, the bill was not even printed. At page 1090 of British Hansard for February 27, 1867, we find these words: Mr. Hatfield said he rose to ask the government why it was the second reading of this bill had been fixed for to-morrow. It was one, which affected 4,000,000 of people, and upon, which great doubts and differences of opinion were entertained. It was not yet printed and was of so important a character that he thought some little time ought to elapse after it was in the hands of the members before it was introduced in order that some little consultation should take place upon it. He was not at all sure that he should be opposed to it, but he certainly required more time to consider it. Later, on page 1195, on February 28, we find this: He (Mr. Hatfield) thought that a bill of such great importance ought not to be passed through parliament with such haste. It was read a third time in the House of Lords only on Tuesday night and two days after they were called to give it a second reading in that house (Commons) that was a bad precedent to establish and might produce ill effect at another time. If the bill had been delayed only for a few weeks, the people of Nova Scotia would have been able to express an opinion upon it. He had not had time to consider either the bill itself or the papers on the subject, which had been put into his hands. Another significant statement is that by John Bright, which we find at page 1181 of British Hansard for February 28, 1867, as follows: "I have heard there is, at present in London, a petition complaining of the hasty proceedings of Parliament and asking for delay signed by 31,000 adult male, of the province of Nova Scotia; and, that petition is, in reality, signed by at least half of all the male inhabitants of that province. So far as I know, the petition does not protest absolutely against union but against the manner in which it is being carried out by this scheme and bill, and by the hasty measures of the colonial office. Nobody pretends that the people of Canada prefer a nominated council to an elective council. I regret very much that they have not adopted another system with regard to their council or senate, because I am satisfied - I have not a particle of doubt with regard to it - that we run a great danger of making this act work ill almost from the beginning - - - For my share, I want the population of these provinces to do that which they believe to be the best for their own interests - remain with this country if they like, or become independent states if they like." Conclusions From the evidence, which I have thus far submitted, I draw the following conclusions: 1. The provinces of Canada desired a federal union. 2. The Quebec resolutions provided for a federal union. 3. The bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London conference, also provided for a federal union, 4. The colonial office was not disposed to grant the provinces of Canada their request for a federal union. 5. The British North America Act, enacted by the Imperial Parliament, carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec resolutions. 6. Canada did not become a federal union under the British North America Act, but rather a united colony. The privilege of federating, therefore, was still a future privilege. 7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government. It became merely the central legislature of a united colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor General as agent of the Imperial Parliament. 8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution, but merely an Act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government. Further Evidence As further evidence that the British North America Act was not a constitution, and that Canada did not become a federal union, I refer to the definition of the term "dominion" which is to be found in section 18, paragraph 3 of the Interpretation Act of 1889. It reads as follows: "The expression ‘colony’ shall mean any of Her Majesty’s dominions, exclusive of the British islands and of British India; and where parts of such dominions are under both a central legislature and local legislatures, all parts under the central legislature shall, for the purpose of this definition be deemed to be one colony." Excepting Canada, no country in the empire had a central legislature and local legislatures. Therefore, according to this definition made twenty-two years after the enactment of the British North America Act, Canada is deemed to be one colony. To show that I am not alone in my conclusions I quote some of the statements of recognized Canadian constitutional authorities before the special committee on the British North America Act in 1935. Doctor W. P. M. Kennedy, Professor of Law in the University of Toronto, at page 69 of the report states: "I think we have got to get away from the idea that the British North American Act is a contract "or treaty". I do not want to go into that, but it is true neither in history nor in law. The British North America Act is a statute, and has always been interpreted as a statute." Professor N. McL. Rogers, of Queen's University, at page 115 of the report states in reply to a question by Mr. Cowan: Mr. Cowan: You do not subscribe to the belief that this was a pact or contract? Mr. Rogers: I am thoroughly convinced it is not, either in the historical or the legal sense. Then I would quote Doctor Beauchesne, Clerk of the House of Commons, who at page 125 states. "It is quite true that if we apply to the British North America Act the principles followed in the interpretation of statutes, it is not a compact between provinces; it is an act of parliament which does not even embody all the resolutions passed in Canada and in London prior to its passage in the British Parliament where certain clauses that had not been recommended by the Canadian Provinces were added." The evidence which I have submitted establishes to my satisfaction that there has been at no time in Canada any agreement, pact or treaty between the provinces creating a federal union and a federal government. The privilege to federate therefore was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada. Provinces Completely Sovereign Since the Provinces must enjoy the condition of sovereignty and independence before they can federate, it was necessary that the British government relinquish its authority over them. This was done through the enactment of the Statute of Westminster on December 11, 1931. By section 7, paragraph 2, of this statute, the Provinces of Canada were made sovereign, free and independent in order that they might consummate the federal union which they wished to create in 1867, but were not permitted to do so. Since December 11, 1931, the Provinces of Canada have not acted on their newly acquired status; they have not signed any agreement, they have not adopted a constitution, and the people of Canada have not ratified a constitution. Such action should have been taken immediately upon the enactment of the Statute of Westminster. It is by reason of the failure of the Provinces and of the people of Canada to take this action that all the anomalies in our present position exist. We have been trying since 1931 to govern ourselves federally, under an instrument, which was nothing more than an act of the Imperial Parliament for the purpose of governing a colonial possession. Not only has this anomalous condition obtained since 1931, but it has done so without any reference whatsoever having been made to the Canadian people. They have not been consulted on anything pertaining to constitutional matters. Before there can be a federal union in Canada and a federal government, the Provinces of Canada must be free and independent to consummate such a union. They have been free to do so since December 11, 1931, but they have not done so. Canada Without a Constitution I therefore pose this question: Whence does the Dominion Parliament derive its authority to govern this country? The Imperial Parliament cannot create a federal union in Canada or constitute a federal government for the people of Canada by virtue of the British North America Act or any other act. Only the people of Canada can do this, and they have not yet done so. Since December 11, 1931, as an individual citizen of this country I have had the right to be consulted on the matter of a constitution. I have had the right along with my fellow citizens to ratify or to refuse to ratify a constitution, but I have not been consulted in any way whatsoever. I assert therefore that until I, along with a majority of Canadians, ratify a constitution in Canada, there can be no constitution, and I challenge successful contradiction of that proposition. Mr. POULIOT: Were you born in 1867? Mr. KUHL: Not that I recall. Mr. JOHNSTON: Were you? Mr. POULIOT: No. Mr. KUHL: Those who were in charge of Canadian affairs in 1931 were under obligation to acquaint the people of Canada with the constitutional position obtaining at the time and to prepare them so that they would be able to act upon their altered status. Mr. JAENICKE: What about section 7 of the Statute of Westminster? Mr. KUHL: I have already answered that. I have indicated the position of the British North America Act, and have pointed out that the people of Canada have not accepted it as a constitution. Mr. JAENICKE: The Statute of Westminster made the provinces autonomous? Mr. KUHL: Yes. Mr. JAENICKE: What about section 7 of the Statute of Westminster? Mr. KUHL: Which one? Mr. JAENICKE: Amending the British North America Act. Mr. KUHL: Just exactly as I have said, there can be no constitution in Canada, whether it is on the basis of the British North America Act or any other act, until the people of Canada accept it. They have not accepted it. Mr. COLDWELL: We have been acting under the British North America Act since 1867. Mr. KUHL. That does not alter the situation. Mr. JAENICKE: What are you going to do about it? Remedy For Condition Mr. KUHL: Before I resume my seat I shall indicate definitely what to do about it. The people of Canada have not acted on the altered constitutional status; hence the deplorable constitutional position in which we find ourselves in this country. I know of no country, which is in such shocking constitutional circumstances as Canada. As a native of this country it is most humiliating to me to be obliged to continue to accept this position, and I am determined to do my part to rectify that position. Legally, Canada is in a state of anarchy, and has been so since December 11, 1931. All power to govern in Canada since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster has resided with the provinces of Canada, and all power legally remains there until such time as the provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution; whereby, they delegate such powers, as they desire upon a central government of their own creation. Since December 11, 1931, the Parliament of Canada has governed Canada on assumed power only. It is imperative that this situation be dealt with in a fundamental way. Patchwork methods will not suffice. Obviously the first act is that the provinces of Canada shall sign an agreement authorizing the present parliament to function as a provisional government. That is number one in answer to my hon. friend. Secondly, steps must then be taken to organize and elect a constituent assembly whose purpose will be to draft a constitution which must later be agreed to by the provinces and then ratified by the people of Canada. The dominion-provincial conference is to reconvene in the near future. This would be a most appropriate time and a most appropriate occasion on which to initiate action of this kind. I trust that the delegates to this conference will not disappoint us in this matter. I shall observe with much interest what will be said in this conference on constitutional relationships in Canada. Proposals Endorsed To show that I am not alone in my proposal I quote Doctor Beauchesne from the evidence of the special committee on the British North America Act in 1935. On page 126 of the evidence he is credited with saying: "-The Statute of Westminster has altered our status. The time has come, in my humble opinion, when the British North America Act, except as to minority rights, should be transformed and a new constitution more in conformity with present conditions should be adopted. Amendments here and there would be mere patchwork, which could not last. The people of 1935 are different from those of 1867. What we want is a new constitution. The new constitution must leave nobody with a grievance. A spirit of conciliation should predominate. For these reasons, the task must be entrusted to an independent body in which all the elements of the country will be represented. I, therefore, beg to suggest an imposing constituent assembly formed of eminent men coming from all parts of Canada. Provincial conferences, attended by a few ministers meeting behind closed doors, would hardly satisfy public opinion. The debate should be public. I want the assembly to sit in a city in the west. It would not be necessary for a delegate to be a Member of Parliament or of a provincial Legislature." And on page 128 Doctor Beauchesne is reported as follows: “I would suggest that the assembly do not sit in Ottawa, in order that it may not have the appearance of being dominated or even influenced by the dominion power; and as the western provinces are of such paramount importance in the country, I suggest the best city for the representatives to gather in would be Winnipeg.” And again on page 131: "There have been many disputes about provincial rights since 1867 and it seems certain that when a new constitution is drawn up, the distribution of federal and provincial powers will have to be modified." And again on page 131: "There have been many disputes about provincial rights since 1867 and it seems certain that when a new constitution is drawn up, the distribution of federal and provincial powers will have to be modified." And page 135: "I think the time is ripe for a change in the constitution. I do not think you would need much publicity in order to draw to the attention of the people of this country that the British North America Act is inadequate." And finally on page 129: "Whether our country should be changed from a dominion to a kingdom is also a subject which might be discussed. I would suggest that the country should be called "the federated states of Canada." I should also like to quote in this connection a resolution, which was adopted at a convention of Social Credit supporters and monetary-reform-minded people held in the city of Edmonton in 1942. This resolution is to be found at page 59 in the publication "Prepare Now," issued by the Bureau of Information, Legislative Building, Edmonton. It reads as follows: "Whereas the statute of Westminster, in granting complete sovereignty and equality with Great Britain to Canada and other nations of the British Commonwealth, has changed the relative positions of the provincial and federal governments as provided in the B.N.A. Act; and, Whereas it is desirable and expedient in the interests of national unity that an interprovincial conference of appropriate representatives of the Canadian Provinces be held for the purpose of reviewing and adjusting the constitutional relationship as between the Provinces and their central government with a view to providing effective democratic government in Canada; Therefore be it resolved that without in any way prejudicing or jeopardizing the rights and privileges of any minority group in Canada, a comprehensive conference of representatives of the Provinces be held for the purpose of considering: 1. The existing legislative and administrative organization in the provincial and federal spheres. 2. A more expedient allocation of powers as between the provincial and federal authorities. 3. Ways and means of facilitating the drafting, the adoption and the implementation of a Canadian constitution in keeping with the rights granted in the Statute of Westminster. I contend, Mr. Speaker, that such are the actions, which should be taken before it is appropriate to adopt a distinctive national flag. I submit that the adoption of a new flag of our own designing should be the crowning act to putting our constitutional house in order. I contend, Mr. Speaker, that such are the actions, which should be taken before it is appropriate to adopt a distinctive national flag. I submit that the adoption of a new flag of our own designing should be the crowning act to putting our constitutional house in order. I contend, Mr. Speaker, that such are the actions, which should be taken before it is appropriate to adopt a distinctive national flag. I submit that the adoption of a new flag of our own designing should be the crowning act to putting our constitutional house in order.