Premium Only Content
Can "Fact Checking" lead to legal liability under CDA 230 law?
It seems "fact-checking" on social media platforms like twitter and facebook has many people up in arms. They wrongfully believes these online service providers (who offer their service for free) somehow owe them constitutional first amendment rights. Well, this isn't true, and moreover, currently it is rarely possible to hold a company like these liable defamation, false light, right of publicity violations, slander, libel, or even for intellectual property infringement which occurs on their website (ex. infringing photos and videos can be subject to DMCA takedown under section 512 of the copyright laws, and if certain rules are followed, there is no liability to Youtube or other online platform. So taken together these sites enjoy large immunity from lawsuits due to CDA (Communications Decency) liability protection, and DMCA "safe harbors."
However, the issue of the day is "fact-checking." When a site like facebook or twitter engages in active patrolling of websites, review of content, and approving or disapproving (if disapproving this is done by taking the step to post or publish a "fact check label" which many users find embarrassing, but which are alleged to be undertaken to "prevent fake news" (usually political) and some argue anti-Tump in nature.
Trump himself was "fact checked" (on topic of whether mail in ballots can lead to fraud), and he got a bit upset and decided to pass an executive order asking the FTC and FCC to look deeper into the issue of whether online platforms who engage in the active content blocking should still retain liability under the CDA, or is their conduct more "editorial" in nature (more acting like a speaker or a publisher) such that they should lost their liability if they are wrong.
This is a hot issue right now. We know these sites can create their own community standards, but can they decide what is true and what is not? How do they even have the time and personal power to do that fairly across the board. Will there be college majors for fact-checking one day?
Listen to Attorney Steve® explain this interesting top on this episode of Litigation Whiteboard®
This is general legal information only and not legal advice. This is an advertisement and communication.
-
6:48
Attorney Steve® Legal News
2 years agoPhotographer's $6.3 million verdict for photo infringement
66 -
42:43
Sarah Westall
8 hours agoThe Psychological War Online - How They Target You | Eric Meder
49.5K3 -
1:29:35
DLDAfterDark
6 hours ago $2.35 earnedBadge Cam Shootings - Let's Watch Some Semi Precious Metals Fly!
42K -
2:16:00
megimu32
6 hours agoOTS: THEY STOLE THAT… AND IT STILL WASN’T BETTER!
39.2K4 -
1:33:50
Precision Rifle Network
1 day agoGuns & Grub - New Guns!
28.4K5 -
1:02:27
Glenn Greenwald
9 hours agoADL Demands More Censorship of Tucker, Hasan Piker, Nick Fuentes, and More; Plus: Glenn's Debate About Iran on Piers Morgan | SYSTEM UPDATE #567
114K137 -
2:24:24
Barry Cunningham
8 hours agoLIVE TONIGHT: President Trump and NHL Champions Florida Panthers | Nick Shirley Video
65.3K26 -
1:03:35
BonginoReport
10 hours agoMinneapolis is OUT OF CONTROL! - Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia (Ep.214)
180K117 -
1:30:11
Kim Iversen
12 hours agoAmericans TURN On Trump Over ICE, Rogan Compares To Gestapo
157K361 -
2:21:47
Red Pill News
12 hours agoMinneapolis on FIRE - Time For Insurrection Act on Red Pill News Live
94.2K36