NYT Attacks Bitcoin Mining (Hit Piece)

Get the "Ultimate Guide to Bitcoin" course:
https://www.trader.university/courses/38824-the-ultimate-guide-to-bitcoin
Use the discount code YT99 to get the best price.

In this video, I discuss the recent New York Times hit piece on Bitcoin mining.

While focusing on the Texas ERCOT grid and demand response programs, the article fails to mention why anyone (especially the globally disenfranchised) might want or need a neutral and permission-less form of money like Bitcoin to begin with.

The NYT doesn't like Proof of Work, but fails to provide an alternate other than accepting the status quo of the US dollar being backed by Proof of War. Are Bitcoin mining rigs, or the US military, more responsible for ultimately generating carbon emissions?

Does Bitcoin mining waste energy?

No, it does not because:

1) Bitcoin mining rigs are incredibly energy efficient, and continue to get more energy efficient over time;

2) Bitcoin mining is a worthy use of energy, because Bitcoin provides a unique form of neutral and ethical money that cannot be captured, controlled, debased, or censored.

My biggest takeaway from the NYT article is that it's a really bad idea to politicize electricity. No one should be given the power to decide what is and what is not a worthy use of electricity.

If you still have a subscription to the New York Times, you are helping to fund propaganda against Bitcoin like this article.

Not investment advice! Consult a financial advisor.

The Real-World Costs of the Digital Race for Bitcoin:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/09/business/bitcoin-mining-electricity-pollution.html

Paul Krugman's 10-Year History of Being Wrong About Bitcoin:
https://reason.com/2021/06/10/paul-krugmans-10-year-history-of-being-wrong-about-bitcoin/

NYT has a long history of being wrong about new technologies:
https://twitter.com/natbrunell/status/1645457663843614721

How much environmental damage and energy usage can be attributed to the NYT itself:
https://twitter.com/raphschoen/status/1645717714869075970

NYT likes porn, but doesn't consider its energy usage:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/14/movies/erika-lust.html

Bitcoin, Gold, ESG, and Porn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k39GDkjvMRI&ab_channel=BitcoinUniversity

How Bitcoin Mining Helps The Electric Grid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruSAOqEfCiE&ab_channel=BitcoinUniversity

Why Bitcoin Mining Is Good For The Environment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j4cXA09Dz0&ab_channel=BitcoinUniversity

Can Bitcoin Actually Help Real People?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRytOTgJZWs&ab_channel=BitcoinUniversity

Did the NYT doctor the drone footage?
https://twitter.com/level39/status/1645453035781382146

I am not being paid or otherwise compensated by any company or cryptocurrency project that I mention in my videos.

My opinion is not for sale. Please do not contact me with any affiliate or advertising deals.

#Bitcoin
#bitcoinmining
#nytimes

Disclaimer
Neither Bitcoin University, nor any of its directors, officers, shareholders, personnel, representatives, agents, or independent contractors (collectively, the “Operator Parties”) are licensed financial advisors, registered investment advisors, or registered broker-dealers. None of the Operator Parties are providing investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, and nothing in this video or at www.Trader.University (henceforth, “the Site”) should be construed as such by you. This video and the Site should be used as educational tools only and are not replacements for professional investment advice. There is a high risk in trading.