Google Policy Agenda Reveals AI Regulation Wishlist - Search Engine Journal

🥇 Bonuses, Promotions, and the Best Online Casino Reviews you can trust: https://bit.ly/BigFunCasinoGame

Google Policy Agenda Reveals AI Regulation Wishlist - Search Engine Journal

Google published an AI Policy Agenda paper that outlines a vision for responsible deployment of AI and suggestions for how governments should regulate and encourage the industry.
Google AI Policy Agenda
Google announced the publication of an AI policy agenda with suggestions for responsible AI development and regulations.
The paper notes that government AI policies are independently forming around the world and calls for a cohesive AI agenda that strikes a balance between protecting against harmful outcomes while getting out of the way of innovation. Google writes: “Getting AI innovation right requires a policy framework that ensures accountability and enables trust.
We need a holistic AI strategy focused on:
(1) unlocking opportunity through innovation and inclusive economic growth;
(2) ensuring responsibility and enabling trust; and
(3) protecting global security.
A cohesive AI agenda needs to advance all three goals — not any one at the expense of the others.” Google’s AI policy agenda has three core objectives: Opportunity
Responsibility
Security Opportunity
This part of the agenda asks governments to be encouraging of the development of AI by investing in: Research and development
Creating a friction-less legal environment that unfetters the development of AI
Planning the educational support for training an AI-ready workforce In short, the agenda is asking governments to get out of the way and get behind AI to help advance technology. The policy agenda observes: “Countries have historically excelled when they maximize access to technology and leverage it to accomplish major public objectives, rather than trying to limit technological advancement.” Responsibility
Google’s policy agenda argues that responsible deployment of AI will depend on a mixture of government laws, corporate self-regulation and input from non-governmental organizations. The policy agenda recommends: “Some challenges can be addressed through regulation, ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed in line with responsible industry practices and international standards.
Others will require fundamental research to better understand AI’s benefits and risks, and how to manage them, and developing and deploying new technical innovations in areas like interpretability and watermarking.
And others may require new organizations and institutions.” The agenda also recommends: “Encourage adoption of common approaches to AI regulation and governance, as well as a common lexicon, based on the work of the OECD. “ What is OECD?
The OECD is the OECD.AI Policy Observatory, which is supported by corporate and government partners.
The OECD government stakeholders include the US State Department and the US Commerce Department.
The corporate stakeholders are comprised of organizations like the Patrick J McGovern Foundation, whose leadership team is stacked with Silicon Valley investors and technology executives who have a self-interest in how technology is regulated.
Google Advocates Less Corporate Regulation
Google’s policy recommendation on regulation is that less regulation is better and that corporate transparency could hinder innovation. It recommends: “Focusing regulations on the highest-risk applications can also deter innovation in the highest-value applications where AI can offer the most significant benefits.
Transparency, which can support accountability and equity, can come at a cost in accuracy, security, and privacy.
Democracies need to carefully assess how to strike the right balances.” Then later it recommends taking efficiency and productivity into consideration: “Require regulatory agencies to consider trade-offs between different policy objectives, including efficiency and productivity enhancement, transparency, fairness, privacy, security, and resilience. “ There has always been, and will always be, a tug of war between corporate entities struggling against oversight and government regulators seeking to protect the public.
AI can solve humanities toughest problems and provide unprecedented benefits. Google is right that a balance should be found between the interests of the public and corporations.
Sensible Recommendations
The document contains sensible recommendations, such as suggesting that existing regulatory agencies develop guidelines specifi...