The Case Against a Late Genesis. Is Modern Scholarship Wrong?

Modern bible scholarship seems dissmissive of the idea of an early Genesis, early enough to have been written by a historical Moses. With such an air of certainty and confidence, their evidence must be overwhelming, right? Surprisingly, it is anything but. Here I look at elements from a paper by a Jonathan Burke, who I don't think is a scholar himself but he makes their case using the same kind of things they have been saying- when they bother to give any specific evidence at all. That's something that has consistently amazed me- the reluctance of scholars to engage on the issue and the specifics of the evidence they have. They seem to be bluffing.

The birthplace of Abraham was not the southern Ur: http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmolo...

The paper I am talking about which tries to make the case against an early Genesis: https://www.academia.edu/34767902/Dat...

Link to Amazon Page: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB