Argumentation Ethics | You've agreed to Private Property by Speaking

#economics #method #debate

Argumentation ethics states that: Humans are capable of argumentation and know the meaning of truth. Nonaggression is a necessary precondition for argumentation. One does not argue with random and meaningless propositions. Arguing is an activity. The arguer makes a truth claim. These truth claims do not always end in agreement. However, there is agreement on the fact that you own your body.

Argumentation without private property is impossible. The truth of this can’t be undone. Anything stated would be with sound made from your own body. So, the arguer is agreeing to the fact that they own their body. The arguer is recognizing private property. It’s impossible to argue against private property without engaging in a performative contradiction. The very denial would be made with the use of private property.

Read More: https://mrdevinney.com/argumentation-ethics/