waptek hasn't read blacks law dictionary Legalese guardian vs English custodian apparently

to rationalize themselves as not under the jurisdiction of the federal government & exempt from U.S. law. through selective use of obsolete version of Black's Law Dictionary, state court opinions , Uniform Commercial Code & treaties fictitious or real between the USA & lets say 1787 Morocco while ignoring the Supremacy Clause, which establishes the Constitution as the law of the land & the US supreme Court's authority to interpret it in the second clause of Article VI of the Constitution A common law sovereign citizen may be seen as truth pious & patriotic

is the law what what we all say it is or
is the law what an early 20th century dictionary say it is or
is the law what a bunch of 1775 judges in England say ?

A "legal" guardian is someone who is appointed by a court to protect & care for the health & well-being of an incapacitated person, or a minor child. & this USUALLY carried out in probate court in the county where the kid is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
https://thelawdictionary.org/guardian/

https://blacks_law.en-academic.com/6879/custodian

waptek He hasn't read a blacks law dictionary apparently. Why Aren’t Legalese and English the Same? It isn’t because words mean something different in Legalese. It’s because words are infinitely more specific in Legalese. What might seem like nit-picky semantics or splitting hairs in normal, every day conversation means a whole lot in a legal context. For example, take the words “guardian” and “custodian”. You might use those two words interchangeably. In casual conversation, if I were talking about my own children in relation to school, I might say that I could get copies of their report cards because I am their “legal guardian” or I am their “legal custodian” & no matter how I said it, you’d nod your head and know what I’m talking about. In the legal world, however, those are different things. You’d get guardianship through probate court and custody through superior court. As the legal and biological parent of my children, who were naturally born of my womb within the bounds of my marriage to my husband, my husband and I are my children’s custodians, not guardians despite the fact that there is not a court order saying so for either of us

= other citations archived due to youtube link bot & censor flag threats

don't, rate, comment, subscribe, or hit the bell, till you pause this & read the title & description.
my work is transformative in nature as criticism so some usage of the original is required but
uses no more of the original than is necessary & this has no negative affect on the market for
the original work its self & my work is protected speech as outlined by the 1st amendment to
the united states constitution & falls under fair use as outlined in united states copyright laws.

I denounce & DEBUNK any acts of violence on any person, being group or establishment

COPPA children's on line privacy protection act disclosure & DISCLAIMER =
the uploader of this video is NOT the website, service, or app operator & thus
lacks the ABILITY to collect, use, or disclose ANYONE'S personal information
& has a general mixed audience that is specifically EXEMPTED under COPPA .
,
fear, ignorance & anger are the 3 horsemen of the apocalypse, don't be #4!

http://odysee.com/@waptek2:0
http://odysee.com/@waptek1:5
http://youtube.com/waptek1
http://youtube.com/waptek2
http://youtube.com/c/WapTek123/
&
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek2/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek0/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek1/
http://bitchute.com/channel/waptek9/

This video is only for facts science Experiment or entertainment & Any actions
in this video shall not be a call to repeat them , the author shall not be held liable
for any actions you perform, Do not try to do anything discussed in this work &
this video does not a demonstrate a weapon or its production