Premium Only Content

LinkedIn shows publishers why they should not depend on platforms
Are you tired of changing your business because some programmer has tinkered with an algorithm? They say it’s for the sake of the users, but we all know it’s to increase their ad revenue.
LinkedIn recently changed how they promote content on their site. They say they want to make our feeds more relevant and informative, not just “engaging and sticky,” and they don’t want to chase the latest “viral” content.
According to the article I link below, there are two big changes.
* It’s more likely that your followers will see your post.
* Posts that share “knowledge and advice” are prioritized.
How can an algorithm pick out “knowledge and advice”? Apparently they’re looking for people who are building a community around content. But … isn’t that a touch circular, since you can only build a community if people see your content in the first place?
The article points to four things.
* The post speaks to a distinct audience. LinkedIn looks at every post and asks “Who is this relevant to?”
* The author is writing in his core subject area. LinkedIn evaluates whether you’re an authority on the topic.
* The post has meaningful comments. Again, this seems like a chicken and egg problem, but I think the point is that they don’t want “true,” and “this is great,” and that sort of thing.
* The post has a perspective. It’s not just generic goop.
LinkedIn allegedly wants content creators to focus on reaching the right people with relevant content, rather than just reaching lots of people.
I’ll believe it when I see it, I guess, but the larger question for me is whether content creators should allow themselves to be subject to platform rules and changing expectations. If you live by the algorithm, you die by the algorithm.
Now I’m not into comics, but I heard a very interesting interview yesterday with Eric July, who has built his own empire that the tech platforms can’t destroy by suddenly changing their rules. He controls his entire process.
That sounds very appealing – and exhausting.
Most of us use platforms because we want to see what other people are doing and what they’re saying. We want to interact with them. But then people try to game the system, and the platforms have to respond.
It’s a weird sort of a war, reminiscent of the SEO battles.
My recommendation – and my personal strategy – is to use the platforms for their reach until you can build enough of a connection with your customers that you don’t need the platforms any more. Don’t build a long-term strategy that relies on the platforms, because when they change the rules, you’ll be in trouble.
Resources
LinkedIn Changed Its Algorithms – Here’s How your Posts Will Get More Attention Now
https://www.entrepreneur.com/science-technology/linkedin-changed-its-algorithms-heres-how-your-posts/454728
-
21:15
Actual Justice Warrior
13 hours agoJimmy Kimmel DECLARES Victory
5.03K19 -
49:42
Liz Wheeler
15 hours agoWHO is Behind ANTIFA? | Ep 176
31.2K14 -
8:30
MattMorseTV
16 hours ago $7.61 earnedThis just ENDED Newsom's CAREER.
157K52 -
17:11
Nikko Ortiz
13 hours agoIs Poverty Your Fault?
10.7K11 -
41:10
The Connect: With Johnny Mitchell
4 days ago $9.89 earnedInside The Sinaloa Cartel's Fight For Survival: How Mexico's Oldest Cartel Is Making It's Last Stand
40.7K16 -
1:44:47
Side Scrollers Podcast
1 day agoKimmel RETURNS + Twitch University + More! | Side Scrollers
60.2K8 -
5:43
GritsGG
1 day agoBest Way To Get Specialist EVERY Game!
34.2K2 -
LIVE
Lofi Girl
2 years agoSynthwave Radio 🌌 - beats to chill/game to
244 watching -
6:48
Buddy Brown
13 hours ago $13.32 earnedWatch What Happens When you Set up a "Charlie Tent" at HBCU! | Buddy Brown
167K69 -
3:02:05
FreshandFit
14 hours agoObese Black Girls Got Triggered Over THIS...
124K114