'PRINCIPAL REPORTED DEAD IS INTERVIEWED ON VERY SAME PAGE!' - 2012

Published on Dec 21, 2012

"Open description box & PAUSE AS NEEDED
After carefully weighing all the evidence from all sources, this Snippet clearly shows the highly touted Associated Press and Newton Bee interviewing the Principal where the alleged shooting rampage took place AFTER she had been declared dead. In the case of the AP (as clearly shown here) I find it incredible THAT ON THE VERY SAME PAGE THEY DECLARE HER DEAD THEY ACTUALLY INTERVIEW HER, COMPLETE WITH UPDATE LATER IN THE EVENING!
Why are there so many inconsistencies in this story. Witnesses make conflicting statements about how many shots were heard and THE RIFLE IS FOUND IN THE ALLEGED SHOOTER'S TRUNK, STILL IN IT'S CASE! If there is nothing to hide why would the Newton Police threaten to prosecute people for merely seeking information, TRUTH and evidence? I make no allegations BUT I DO know what I see RIGHT HERE, IN PRINT, from a REPUTABLE SOURCE! If this is some random act of Violence my heart naturally goes out to all the victims'' families..
Then there is the "smiling grieving Father". What's the deal with that & him? Certainly this is NO natural human response from a Father who just lost his child BUT THE BOTTOM LINE & CAUSE FOR THIS VIDEO IS TO POINT OUT THE HOLES IN THIS STORY AS REPORTED BY BOTH "NEWTON BEE" & ASSOCIATED PRESS"!

Excerpt placed herein WITH PERMISSION of Original Creator, You Tube User "humanbeing4truth" as shown here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJpTe...

Also, this is public information and falls under FOIA and the following disclaimer for Fair Use. No copyright infringement intended under Fair Use. "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes."

If you appreciate the things I find then might I consider purchasing a few dollars of Sandy Hook Hoax token on the Algorand blockchain https://vestige.fi/asset/1156612691
Things live forever and permanently on the blockchain and if the token gets enough support we can ensure that all of the hard work everyone has done and continues to do doesn't one day get all traces of it eliminated. Keep saving, archiving, seeding, downloading and sharing everything. If you don't you allow them to erase and rewrite history how they see fit. Remember that you pay them to tell you what you can talk about. :)