Premium Only Content

Everything CHANGED In The 80’s
In the 1980s, American politicians began to increasingly rely on large corporate donations as a means to fund their campaigns. This shift was largely influenced by changes in campaign finance laws and the growing influence of money in politics.
One key factor that contributed to this trend was the Supreme Court's 1976 decision in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. This ruling equated campaign spending with free speech and upheld limits on individual contributions to political campaigns but struck down restrictions on independent expenditures. This decision opened the door for corporations and wealthy individuals to spend unlimited amounts of money to support political candidates or causes, leading to the rise of political action committees (PACs).
The emergence of PACs in the 1980s played a significant role in the increased corporate donations to politicians. These organizations allowed corporations to pool their resources and make substantial contributions to candidates they supported. PACs became a way for corporations to gain access and influence in the political sphere, as politicians increasingly relied on these donations to fund their campaigns.
Additionally, the 1980s saw the rise of "soft money" in political campaigns. Soft money refers to contributions made to political parties rather than directly to candidates. While there were restrictions on how soft money could be used, loopholes allowed parties to use these funds for activities that indirectly benefited specific candidates. This enabled corporations to donate large sums of money to political parties, indirectly supporting their preferred candidates without violating direct contribution limits.
The increased reliance on corporate donations in the 1980s had significant consequences for American politics. It led to concerns about the influence of money in shaping political decisions and policy outcomes. Critics argued that politicians became more responsive to the interests of corporations rather than the needs of ordinary citizens. The influence of corporate donations also fueled perceptions of a "pay-to-play" system, where access and influence were granted to those who could afford to make substantial contributions.
Ultimately, the 1980s marked a turning point in American politics as politicians increasingly sought and accepted large corporate donations to fund their campaigns. This shift in campaign financing practices had a lasting impact on the political landscape and raised important questions about the role of money in shaping democratic processes and policy outcomes.
#politics #bigpharma #militaryindustrialcomplex #president #corruption #cia #war #greed #presidentialcampaign #wallstreet #usa #america
-
38:21
Stephen Gardner
2 days ago🔥Is Kash Patel HIDING DETAILS About Charlie Kirk & Jeffrey Epstein? Judge Joe Brown
66.1K187 -
26:33
DeVory Darkins
1 day ago $58.50 earnedRep Omar EMBARRASSES herself in a painful way as Newsom PANICS over Kamala confrontation
98.1K326 -
3:28:14
Badlands Media
1 day agoThe Narrative Ep. 39: The Sovereign Mind
125K39 -
2:17:35
TheSaltyCracker
12 hours agoThe Charlie Kirk Effect ReeEEStream 9-21-25
137K367 -
2:03:07
vivafrei
12 hours agoEp. 283: Charlie Kirk Memorial and other Stuff in the Law World
235K207 -
9:13:12
The Charlie Kirk Show
22 hours agoLIVE NOW: Building A Legacy, Remembering Charlie Kirk
2.19M962 -
1:55:20
The White House
15 hours agoPresident Trump Participates in the Memorial Service for Charlie Kirk
120K97 -
1:02:41
Sarah Westall
13 hours agoDomestic Terror Operation: Death Threats, Smear Campaigns, Gang Stalking w/ Journalist Sarah Fields
76.1K11 -
1:51:40
Nerdrotic
14 hours ago $26.25 earnedGobekli Tepe Discovery and "Reconstruction" | Forbidden Frontier #118
113K13 -
29:07
Tactical Advisor
14 hours agoATF Changes Ruling on SBR & Tacpack unboxing | Vault Room Live Stream 039
112K21