FOREVA EVA @RekietaLaw

We go live at 9AM Pacific!
FOLLOW HERE:
https://rumble.com/user/Divinity143

THIS WEEK WE WILL GO INTO THE APPEAL AND THE 'EVIDENCE'.

HAVE YOU LOOKED?
THE SAME STUFF THE DEFENSE WAS NOT OFFERING 'FOR THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER' THEY ARE TRYING TO ADMIT THROUGH APPEAL.

DOES ANY OF IT HAVE TO DO WITH THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTISLAPP?
ARE THEY PROVING THE 'CHOICE OF LAW' WAS DONE WRONG, OR ARE THEY PROVING HE IS DEFAMATION PROOF?
SPOILER ALERT: IT'S A MONTY BLEED.
WHEN NICK IS ORDERED TO PAY COURT COSTS THIS STUNT MAY COME BACK TO HAUNT HIM.

THE REAL ANNOYING PART:
NICK IS USING ANTI-SLAPP, AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TOOL (HIS WORDS), TO FIGHT UNCONSTITUTIONALITY?

IT'S STUPID AND WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT.

WILL NICK SUCCESSFULLY PROVE THAT INTERNET RUMORS ARE INDEED WORTH LISTENING TO? AND IN THE PROCESS OF THIS DOES HE CONCEED TO THE GROOMING/PEDO APOLOGIST/SWINGING/CUCKING/FRAUD ACCUSATIONS THAT HAVE LONG BEEN ON THE INTERNET ABOUT HIMSELF AND HIS CREW? CAUSE LORE IS... TRUTH? I DONT GET IT.

IT JUST KEEPS GETTING DUMBER.