Premium Only Content
Insurer Not Obligated to Share With Successor Insurer
Other Insurance Clause Only Applies to Concurrent Policies
After the trial court granted the Travelers Indemnity Company and The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut's (collectively Travelers) motion for partial summary judgment finding that indemnity costs incurred by Travelers in connection with the asbestos liabilities of defendants' subsidiary should be allocated on a pro-rata time-on-the-risk basis.
In The Travelers Indemnity Company et al. v. Fishbach, L.L.C., et al., 2023 NY Slip Op 04741, Appeal No. 608, Index No. 657060/21 Case No. 2023-00815, Supreme Court of New York, First Department (September 26, 2023) resolved the dispute.
DECISION
The appellate court agreed with Travelers that it was not liable to cover costs incurred by the insured that occurred outside of the policy period and that any costs it was entitled to cover should be allocated pro rata over the entire period during which damages (personal injuries) occurred.
Finding that the appeal was controlled by Keyspan Gas E. Corp. v Munich Reins. Am., Inc. (31 N.Y.3d 51, 61 [2018]), where the Court of Appeals found that the so-called "unavailability rule," which would require insurers to bear the risk for periods when applicable insurance coverage was not available in the marketplace, was inconsistent with the contract language that provides the foundation for the pro rata approach-namely, the during the policy period limitation-and that to allocate risk to the insurer for years outside the policy period would be to ignore the very premise underlying pro rata allocation
Thus, with respect to insurance policy language like issued by Travelers, which limited indemnification to losses and occurrences during the policy period the insured, and not the insurer, bore the risk for those years during which such coverage was unavailable.
Defendants' contention that Supreme Court (trial court in New York) erred by failing to give effect to the "other insurance" provisions in the Travelers policies was unavailing. New York law is clear that other insurance clauses do not apply to successive insurance policies thus, despite the fact that the subject provision contains no temporal or policy period limitation, when harmonized with the definition of bodily injury, the "other insurance" provision within the Travelers policies pertains to concurrent policies that named defendants (or their subsidiaries) as additional insureds.
Defendants provided no evidence that the 1990 settlement with Travelers had anything to do with litigation commenced four years later the Supreme Court correctly determined that, as "the release explicitly limits itself to current and future obligations and liabilities for premiums," it was irrelevant to the allocation of indemnity costs.
ZALMA OPINION
New York ignored spurious claims and applied the clear and unambiguous language of the Travelers' policies to find that there can be no coverage applied as a result of an "other insurance" clause to other insurance in effect after the termination of the Travelers' policies. Sharing only occurs when policies in effect at the same time for the same loss both have other insurance clauses that require pro-rata sharing of losses not sharing four years after settlement for a different claim after expiration of the policy.
(c) 2023 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com at https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe or at substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/publish/post/107007808
Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01
Follow me on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/comm/mynetwork/discovery-see-all?usecase=PEOPLE_FOLLOWS&followMember=barry-zalma-esq-cfe-a6b5257
Daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – http://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
-
13:02
Barry Zalma, Inc. on Insurance Law
1 year agoMurder Pays
4391 -
53:25
X22 Report
4 hours agoMr & Mrs X - Trump Is Using The Same Tactic As Our Founding Fathers To Rebuild America - EP 17
66.9K17 -
LIVE
PudgeTV
1 hour ago🟣 Arc Raiders - Gaming on Rumble | Going Topside w My Daughter’s Husband
80 watching -
2:05:43
LFA TV
21 hours agoRUMBLE RUNDOWN WEEK 7 with SHAWN FARASH 11.22.25 9AM
139K7 -
LIVE
ttvglamourx
2 hours ago $0.60 earnedGLAMOURX VS CALL OF DUTY LOBBIES !DISCORD
133 watching -
LIVE
DannyStreams
4 hours agoSaturday Morning Tarky
76 watching -
1:12:53
Wendy Bell Radio
7 hours agoPet Talk With The Pet Doc
30.5K20 -
LIVE
CHiLi XDD
2 hours agoFF7 Remake | Materia Hunting at its finest!
53 watching -
33:49
SouthernbelleReacts
21 hours ago $1.43 earnedNOT THE GOPHER ðŸ˜ðŸ¤£ | First Time Watching Caddyshack
13.4K2 -
26:19
marcushouse
5 hours ago $5.74 earnedStarship Super Heavy Just Blew Itself Apart! 🤯 What Happened Here!?
17.5K10