Is Ad Blocking Piracy? Duh!

Observed Creator: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPzt-QaWjps&t=5s

Loading... This one was not easy for me to bear patience to... This is a new tuber I recently ran into for the first time so since this is my day 1 release "Officially" on my channel I figured I would start with a non-biased stranger to kick things off. OK topic is whether or not it is okay to steal from YouTube or any platform for that matter... "I feel as though it is frowned upon to do this and that YES it is in-fact a form of piracy or theft" So this gentleman doesn't mind saying it is okay and admits to endorsing the idea himself on his video... (IN HIS DEFENSE BEFORE YOUTUBE MADE CHANGES RECENTLY WITH ADBLOCKERS HE DID CLAIM TO PAY FOR PREMIUM FOR ABOUT 7 YEARS SO I COMMEND HIM FOR THAT, HOWEVER, TODAY HIS DEMIGRAPHIC ON PROPER ETHICS HAS CHANGED SINCE HE GOT OLDER).

Asmongold's Argument on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YQlhHIXmdc&t=982s

Facts: if you are making really good money on this app as a creator then you should have absolutely no problem paying 14 measly dollars a month... you should be f$#@%# grateful to be here and to have come this far and the fact that YouTube even exist to you as an opportunity... for someone repping youtube as 1 of their creators, in my opinion, you should be suspended for sharing this piracy idea... either way it's on you... on the other hand, I have observed you to be unethical in the way you think about the topic as an opinion...

As House Leader you have been Observed by me, Link to be considered entirely (Dis-authenticated) this is not what common sense thinking is. We hold no subscription to you as a creator or affiliation Thanks for your time, if you want to learn more check our site here. Take Care.

https://commoncents.ju.mp/

Consider Fair Use Before Requesting DMCA Takedown
In 2008, a district court ruled that prior to requesting a takedown notice, a copyright owner must consider the likelihood of a claim of fair use. In that case, Universal Music issued a takedown notice for a video of a child dancing to the song, “Let’s Go Crazy,” by Prince. The owner of the video claimed that since Universal didn’t consider the issue of fair use, Universal could have not had a “good faith belief” they were entitled to a takedown. Faced with this novel issue a district court agreed that the failure to consider fair use when sending a DMCA notice could give rise to a claim of failing to act in good faith. (Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 572 F.Supp.2d 1150 (N.D. Cal., 2008).)

As with fair use, there is no bright line test for determining a de minimis use. For example, in another case, a court determined that the use of a copyrighted poster for a total of 27 seconds in the background of the TV show Roc was not de minimis. What distinguished the use of the poster from the use of the photographs in the Seven case? The court stated that the poster was clearly visible and recognizable with sufficient observable detail for the “average lay observer” to view the artist’s imagery and colorful style. (Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc., 126 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 1997).)