Premium Only Content

Publishers: is this why you can't sell subscriptions?
To sell subscriptions, think about value, not audiences
Bo Sacks sent an email about publishing execs telling advertisers about their ability to grow and engage audiences. That’s getting harder because platforms like Facebook are not promoting publisher content like they used to.
Which gives me a good opportunity to remind everybody not to rely on platforms.
Dominic Carter from The Sun says their audience growth has come from “giving the people what they want,” including coverage of TV celebrities.
At that point I stopped and wondered if this is precisely why media companies are having such trouble selling subscriptions.
The top of the funnel – traffic to the site – is “what people want.” Titillating stuff, I guess. Maybe it’s about who wore what on the red carpet.
That sort of thing attracts eyeballs, and if you do it right you can attract a particular audience, but … what do you have when you’ve done that? Do you have people who are interested in buying something?
Magazine sites struggle to get people to spend $10 on an annual subscription. Meanwhile, people are spending $11 a month on Spotify, and $15 a month on Netflix.
If you can’t sell your product, here are two of the many questions you might ask.
Am I offering something of value?
Am I offering it to the right people?
Is it possible – I’m asking, sincerely – that the “build an audience for advertisers” mindset – and the techniques that come along with it – is a poor match for the “find people who might buy” mindset?
How are you qualifying your prospects?
From an ad perspective, you’re looking for a certain demographic with “an interest” in some subject. But I can have a vague, passing interest in all kinds of subjects where I have no interest at all in spending any money. There’s nothing “need to have” there. It’s just candy. A distraction.
Marketers often talk about the difference between nice to have and need to have. An ad-driven site doesn’t even pass the “nice to have” threshold. It’s lower than that. It’s “nice to take a quick look.” “Nice to distract myself while I’m waiting in line.”
If I want to sell content, I want to focus on things people need to have and are willing to spend money on.
So here’s what I’m wondering. Is it reasonable to expect an ad-supported website to draw an audience that’s interested in paying money?
Is it possible that you need a completely different mindset and approach to create a “top of the funnel” site for selling subscriptions?
Resources
Advertising Week Briefing: Publishers pitch their methods for growing and engaging audiences to marketers
https://digiday.com/media/advertising-week-briefing-publishers-pitch-their-methods-for-growing-and-engaging-audiences-to-marketers/
-
55:40
TheSaltyCracker
1 hour agoIdiots Chug Tylenol PT2 ReeEEStream 9-24-25
58 -
LIVE
Akademiks
2 hours agoYoung Thug Dissing YFN Lucci. Ready to Go back to Jail. Offset vs Cardi b
1,286 watching -
Colion Noir
10 hours agoCalifornia Just Banned All Glocks
2.79K5 -
LIVE
The Jimmy Dore Show
2 hours agoNew Footage Shows Charlie Kirk Shot FROM BEHIND! Google ADMITS To COVID Censorship! w/John Kiriakou
8,582 watching -
2:03:18
The Charlie Kirk Show
2 hours agoTPUSA Presents This is The Turning Point Tour LIVE with Megyn Kelly and Governor Glenn Youngkin!!
162K44 -
LIVE
SpartakusLIVE
4 hours ago#1 Challenge CHAMPION of WZ || Ridin' The GRAVY Train w/ GloryJean
356 watching -
LIVE
Badlands Media
18 hours agoAltered State S3 Ep. 47
1,673 watching -
LIVE
putther
1 hour ago⭐ Bounty Hunting on GTA⭐
85 watching -
58:58
MattMorseTV
2 hours ago $2.57 earned🔴This NEW INFO changes EVERYTHING.🔴
9.66K21 -
LIVE
GloryJean
2 hours ago[MnK] Nighttime Duos w/ Spartakus 🔥 6.7 K/D
107 watching