Premium Only Content
Publishers: is this why you can't sell subscriptions?
To sell subscriptions, think about value, not audiences
Bo Sacks sent an email about publishing execs telling advertisers about their ability to grow and engage audiences. That’s getting harder because platforms like Facebook are not promoting publisher content like they used to.
Which gives me a good opportunity to remind everybody not to rely on platforms.
Dominic Carter from The Sun says their audience growth has come from “giving the people what they want,” including coverage of TV celebrities.
At that point I stopped and wondered if this is precisely why media companies are having such trouble selling subscriptions.
The top of the funnel – traffic to the site – is “what people want.” Titillating stuff, I guess. Maybe it’s about who wore what on the red carpet.
That sort of thing attracts eyeballs, and if you do it right you can attract a particular audience, but … what do you have when you’ve done that? Do you have people who are interested in buying something?
Magazine sites struggle to get people to spend $10 on an annual subscription. Meanwhile, people are spending $11 a month on Spotify, and $15 a month on Netflix.
If you can’t sell your product, here are two of the many questions you might ask.
Am I offering something of value?
Am I offering it to the right people?
Is it possible – I’m asking, sincerely – that the “build an audience for advertisers” mindset – and the techniques that come along with it – is a poor match for the “find people who might buy” mindset?
How are you qualifying your prospects?
From an ad perspective, you’re looking for a certain demographic with “an interest” in some subject. But I can have a vague, passing interest in all kinds of subjects where I have no interest at all in spending any money. There’s nothing “need to have” there. It’s just candy. A distraction.
Marketers often talk about the difference between nice to have and need to have. An ad-driven site doesn’t even pass the “nice to have” threshold. It’s lower than that. It’s “nice to take a quick look.” “Nice to distract myself while I’m waiting in line.”
If I want to sell content, I want to focus on things people need to have and are willing to spend money on.
So here’s what I’m wondering. Is it reasonable to expect an ad-supported website to draw an audience that’s interested in paying money?
Is it possible that you need a completely different mindset and approach to create a “top of the funnel” site for selling subscriptions?
Resources
Advertising Week Briefing: Publishers pitch their methods for growing and engaging audiences to marketers
https://digiday.com/media/advertising-week-briefing-publishers-pitch-their-methods-for-growing-and-engaging-audiences-to-marketers/
-
LIVE
Wendy Bell Radio
4 hours agoThe Heat Is On
6,173 watching -
DVR
Chad Prather
15 hours agoHow God Governs History
25.6K15 -
LIVE
LFA TV
11 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | THURSDAY 12/18/25
3,214 watching -
LIVE
OFFICIAL Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Rumble
2 hours agoWhat Was Your Trump Takeaway? YOU JOIN ME LIVE!
581 watching -
LIVE
The Chris Salcedo Show
12 hours agoDemocrat Proves We Are Ruled By The Inept & Uninformed
530 watching -
8:34
Blackstone Griddles
14 hours agoAnnual Holiday Gift Guide | Blackstone Griddles
27.5K -
48:10
State of the Second Podcast
21 hours agoThe Quietest Suppressor Ever? PTR’s PIP Tech Explained (ft. PTR)
13.1K -
23:10
Demons Row
13 hours ago $6.00 earnedBiker Secrets They Never Say Out Loud (Real MC Rules Exposed)
23.3K5 -
2:06:19
BEK TV
1 day agoTrent Loos in the Morning - 12/18/2025
10.6K -
15:25
unclemattscookerylessons
1 day ago $2.28 earned“Crispy Cheesy Potato Croquettes | Gooey Mozzarella Inside!”
11.4K6