Premium Only Content
This video is only available to Rumble Premium subscribers. Subscribe to
enjoy exclusive content and ad-free viewing.
1
Don't believe what you hear from politicians, it is all written, rehearsed, and fake!
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
DEFUND CANADA and WE ALL WIN except the Predators
PROJECT LIBERTY
Self - Sufficient Communities - Restoring Law and Accountability at the Local level- You may email [email protected] We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/ https://www.thefreedomproject2020.org/to-free-humanity
1
comment
2
Who Are You, better yet what are you before the law. Even more so what is CANADA in law. ANYONE
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/
[email protected]
Credit to video to John https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9G0Ie6gq6A
http://eternallyaware.com/index.html
SHARE to end this shit show thank you https://rumble.com/v2vcrf0-june-20-2023.html
Share to educate more men and women. Here is a collection of Important Information to Actually End the Tyranny!
We have added both Youtube and Rumble channels. as many of you know Youtube deletes facts!!!
Alberta Fires Update -Time to Restore law
https://rumble.com/v2uz93g-alberta-fires-update-time-to-restore-law.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO2sfzmRZps
Christine Ireland This is the year we are Not Escaping this!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwnNqXImiUE
https://rumble.com/v2end2u-christine-ireland-this-is-the-year-we-are-not-escaping-this.html
Is This The Most Important Video in The World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3a1qb4HICYA
https://rumble.com/v2erwlq-is-this-the-most-important-video-in-the-world.html
Adrien Thomas & Dallas Hills discuss UNDRIP, First Nations, Indian Act
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jEaOLiA4ao
https://rumble.com/v2cfpr6-adrien-thomas-and-dallas-hills-discuss-undrip-first-nations-indian-act.html
Serena Bear, & Dallas Hills discuss You are the government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0UwsPxuh0c
https://rumble.com/v2bmq2c-serena-bear-and-dallas-hills-what-is-our-next-step.html
Introduction To Constitutional Conventions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVsWP4i1_IQ
https://rumble.com/vwdzo0-introduction-to-constitutional-conventions.html
Ian Cameron Freedom Network @ Dallas Hills Self Sufficient Not Sustainable Death!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ze0d8TrQGRc
https://rumble.com/v2fy830-ian-cameron-freedom-network-dallas-hills-self-sufficient-not-sustainable-de.html
Every Canadian Must See - Canada a Country Without a Constitution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upBRrhtFMM
https://rumble.com/vprldi-every-canadian-must-see-canada-a-country-without-a-constitution.html
Back To the Future - with Dallas Hills
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ7BpxPZZEc
https://rumble.com/vqjsry-back-to-the-future-stop-repeating-history.html
J WILTON LITTLECHILD V ALBERTA Citizens of WETASKIWIN COURT CASE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxe23uBASus
https://rumble.com/v10ca0r-the-naked-truth-beneath-the-black-robe.html
The Canadian Deception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ib6TAybKw0
https://rumble.com/vprp8e-the-canadian-deception.html
Time to End the Globalist System with FACTS!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8N6xNP-Zz0
https://rumble.com/v12q9ij-time-to-end-the-globaists-system-with-facts.html
Canadian Bill of Rights , Charter of Rights & Notwithstanding Clause
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEz4VAeq-0
https://rumble.com/v28ot7w-canadian-bill-of-rights-charter-of-rights-and-notwithstanding-clause.html
Kim Carlson the Government is Not your Government !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxF9iNqjErw
https://rumble.com/v2enbn4-kim-carlson-the-government-is-not-your-government-.html
Every Canadian Must See- Comments have more info - Stan McDonald and Richard Vobes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlD3S7QI28E
https://rumble.com/v2uu5e6-every-canadian-must-see-comments-have-more-info-stan-mcdonald-and-richard-v.html
Dr 'Daniel Nagase' Why hasn't Justin Trudeau Been Arrested YET!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzlrvfr9YfI
https://rumble.com/v2il2sm-dr-daniel-nagase-why-hasnt-justin-trudeau-been-arrested-yet.html
CANADA IS A 150 YEAR OLD LIE (SHARE)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZuvRQkyHnM
https://rumble.com/v2um8si-canada-is-a-150-year-old-lie-share.html
Magna Carta: The Ugly Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMrIuMu6Itw
https://rumble.com/vqj8xs-december-10-2021.html
Rima Laibow, MD , Jake Jackson @ Dallas Hills discuss Solutions and Unity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jB3m8Gtihc
https://rumble.com/v2fwrt2-rima-laibow-md-jake-jackson-dallas-hills-discuss-solutions-and-unity.html
We have an opportunity to use the viewers of this show to bring more together. Point them to Constitutional Conventions site to research more information.
Once more are educated how we are truly enslaved under the Corporation of Canada the faster we may be able to end this Tyranny!
Thank you
Please contact us if you would like us to email and help promote an event.
We also are asking if organizers would like their emails added so they may be connected in their local areas.
Its our time now as millions are pushing back and have become more educated!
4
comments
3
If you Support the Sound of Freedom your supporting the Enemy !!!Wake UP
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
We hold zooms daily 5- 10 est - YOUR Zoom Room at 5 -10 PM Daily https://zoom.us/j/6945489985 or phone in 647 374 4685 meeting ID 694 548 9985
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/
Oh dear, psyop time again! Remember Balenciaga? Yeah, so they're still going strong. People can't even get rid of the evil right in front of their faces but they think a movie made by Satanists is going to stop child trafficking by raising awareness? People don't even know how evil it is, how connected these people are and how embedded trafficking and breeding is inside their cult. And, still, most people have no idea how the controlled opposition gig happens.
How I'm helping end child trafficking is by holding strong to the truth, educating people about their health and well-being so they can lift themselves and be empowered which is the best protection from this type of evil. I'm also educating myself and others on Equity law to model for and teach people how to get out of extreme poverty which is also one of the major causes of child trafficking. I'm not watching a movie made by Satanists and thinking that's going to change the world and stop evil.
So what are you doing in your life to end human trafficking? P. S. it's not just children that are trafficked but they use that to emotionally manipulate people; can't steal loosh without pulling on heartstrings.
Outrage porn, problem-reaction-solution,
begging politicians to do something, microchipping legislated to "save the children". Did people learn nothing from the convid psyop? Create emotional stressors, enter in with the poisonous solution to further the NWO agenda.
LEARN! DISCERN!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=fkRjcShlKk0
.This is the lead ACTOR from the new movie "sound of freedom" that everyone is talking about and just like I always show you, signs and symbols rule this world and you will ALWAYS know them by their fruit! Satan owns and runs the entertainment industry! Don't think for a second that any of these people in Hollywood are on your side! They're ALL in on it! Open your eyes ladies and gentlemen. This movie is being played in theaters because they want you to watch it. Just another perfect example of controlled opposition!
.
.
#thesoundoffreedom #hollywood #magic #problemreactionsolution #revelationofthemethod #childtraffickingawareness
1.19K
views
45
comments
4
Im 72 Years old and here is My Message to End this System
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT80C
Do You KNOW Canada IS NOT A COUNTRY? Canada DOES NOT HAVE A CONSTITUTION? Learn More https://constitutionalconventions.ca/
1.32K
views
6
comments
LATEST SCRIPT MOVES US EVEN CLOSER TO THE GREAT DECEPTION include Pierre Poilievre to this Club!
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93RNdZSRj4
2
comments
6
Steps to Stop Tax Extortion - income tax, property tax
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT80C
Laura Nina has Shelagh McFarlane live today In England Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2pm EST Time
https://www.shelaw.ca/videos/
Shelagh McFarlane speaking at Simmering Kettle tonight in Barrie - 531 Bryne Drive - 7:30 pm December 13, 2023
Shelagh McFarlane and others invite you to the Strategic Plan Update
Learn What Canada Really is !! https://constitutionalconventions.ca/
https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/
Documents for Creston Deputation: https://www.theawarenessproject.ca/
Developing a clear and concise strategic plan will ensure your Local team is moving towards shared goals.
Educate the Mayors/council they are committing Fraud
1.58K
views
32
comments
7
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Learn What Canada Really is !! https://constitutionalconventions.ca/
Contact [email protected]
https://www.shelaw.ca/2023/10/16/for-immediate-release/
Contact Shelagh [email protected]
Documents for Creston Deputation: https://www.theawarenessproject.ca/
Contact Neil from the website
Claudio Silvaggi https://iyoutome.com/
We are working with some amazing men and women to re-public the trustee offices.Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca [email protected]
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
1.3K
views
9
comments
8
Proof of Claim obligated to pay Property tax, income tax and other taxes
ConstitutionalConventions
https://twitter.com/EndTheFraudCC Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca [email protected]
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
https://rumble.com/v4a4cti-the-hegelian-dialectic-problem-reaction-solution.html
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
3
comments
9
Canadian income tax ( ILLEGAL)(SCAM)(FRAUD)
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Taxpayers have now become the main source of funds for the de-facto government
The original tax act of 1917, a temporary tax to finance the war effort, all eleven pages of it.
The original tax act of 1917 to finance the war effort, all eleven pages of it. Finance Minister White hoped it would be a temporary tax and so insisted it be called a *war tax* so that once the war ended, it might be *revisited*. Instead, in 1921 the government added a *sales tax*, and more over the years since..
Photo Credit: via vimyridgehistory.com
de-facto Canada history, July 25: 100 years of “temporary” tax
July 25, 1917. The First World War was at its height, having dragged on for three years grinding up lives, resources, and money.
On July 25, the federal government introduced a “War Income Tax” in Parliament to help replenish the drained federal coffers. The “Income War Tax Act” would be passed on August 17th, and with Royal Assent, come into effect in September 20th.
It was somewhat of a political gesture as well in that only days before the government announced conscription, which would send more young men to war.
Conscription (obligatory military service) was a highly controversial move, and the fact that wealthier Canadians would have to do more to contribute to the war was not totally unwelcome, although there certainly was opposition.
Editorial cartoon of the day, showing cynicism over the new tax possibly leading the phrase *tax grab*.
Editorial cartoon of the day, showing cynicism over the new tax possibly leading the phrase *tax grab*. ©canadianhistoryproject.ca
While it is generally believed that personal income tax was to be a temporary measure and often was touted as such, in truth the finance minister, Sir Thomas White has suggested that it be “revisited” after the war. However, even at the time, other politicians said that once embarked upon, such a tax would likely remain for years to come.
Sir Thomas White, Finance Minister who introduced a *war tax*.
Sir Thomas White, Finance Minister who introduced a *war tax* in 1917 a *temporary* tax that has risen to become the main source of revenue for the government. ©Archives Canada PA 005106
SIR THOMAS WHITE – Minister of Finance (Leeds): Mr. Chairman, I desire today to lay before this committee proposals for a national measure of income taxation. Hitherto we have relied upon duties of customs and of excise, postal rates and other miscellaneous sources of revenue. Canada has been, and will continue during the lifetime of those present today, to be a country inviting immigration. I have, therefore, thought it desirable that we should not be known to the outside world as a country of heavy individual taxation.
We are, however, confronted with grave conditions arising out of the war. The time has arrived when we must resort to direct taxation. I am confident, Mr. Chairman, that the people of Canada, whose patriotism during this war has been so often and so nobly proven, will, in light of present conditions, which call for it, cheerfully accept the burden and the sacrifice of this additional taxation”.
We cannot see very far ahead in these days. We do not know how long this war will last. We do not know what the attitude of the people of this country will be upon the many questions, social, industrial, financial and fiscal.
Therefore, I have placed no time limit upon this measure but merely have placed upon Hansard the suggestion that, a year or two after the war is over, the measure should be reviewed by the minister of finance of the day, with a view of judging whether it is suitable to the conditions which then prevail.
But since that time, taxes and methods of taxation have dramatically increased, with the government creating new methods and areas to tax.
The Globe newspaper in July 1917 announcing the tax as a headline even superceding war news.The Globe newspaper in July 26,1917 announcing the tax as a headline even superceding war news. ©via vimyridgehistory.com
The original 11-page tax act, has ballooned into a document of over 3,000 pages.
In 1918, a person required to pay taxes would have contributed the equivalent of about 14 dollars in today’s terms, whereas in 2016 that same person would be paying over $4,000.
Income tax, once a minimal source of revenue for the government, has now risen to the point where taxpayers have now become the main source of funds for the government, growing from a mere 2.6 per cent of revenue in 2017, to and expected 51 per cent this year.
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
1.4K
views
8
comments
10
Proof of Claim obligated to pay Property tax, income tax and other taxes
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca [email protected]
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
https://rumble.com/v4a4cti-the-hegelian-dialectic-problem-reaction-solution.html
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny, and if we don’t take action we will be diluted out from ever again being able to take this course of action that will make us the free
Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
Show less
2.83K
views
18
comments
11
How I Took CRA & Corporate Agent to Court and Seized the Agents House
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Good afternoon Darcy,
Thanks for providing your delegation form (attached) earlier this week. In reviewing the document (as well as the information package provided earlier to all members of Council), I wanted to confirm the desired resolution you are seeking. If I understand the request correctly, you are hoping to provide guidance to Council on the legitimacy (or lack there-of) of Council’s jurisdiction. If that understanding is correct, I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province, and if there is concern about validity of jurisdiction, that concern is best directed to the Provincial Government, as it is outside of the authority of Council to change. Our Procedure Bylaw guides our delegation process and matters that fall outside of the scope of Council’s authority are typically not permitted. If I am off-base on the purpose and desired outcome of the delegation, please let me know and I can review further (I will be out of the office for a week or so, but can review upon my return). I can also confirm that even if the delegation is in-scope, we cannot extend the time past 10 minutes as you requested (though additional time can be provided at the meeting by the Mayor for Council to ask the delegation questions).
Sincerely,
RevisedLARGE - Copy
Ross Coupé
Corporate Officer
250.392.1773 | kisspng-computer-icons-fax-encapsulated-postscript-clip-ar-fax-icon-5ae0e4186c9a48 250.392.4408
[email protected]
www.williamslake.ca
City of Williams Lake
450 Mart Street, Williams Lake, BC V2G 1N3
I am grateful to work on the traditional territory of the T’exelcemc people of the Secwepemc Nation.
The information contained in this email message, including any attached documents, is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any review, use, copying, distribution or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete and destroy all copies of this email message.
Good evening Ross,
You must be confused. I did not ask for a "Delegation Request", the MAYOR did! It was the mayor who told you to schedule a meeting with the council and to be sure of unlimited time for this important issue, and to be made public. I have no desired resolution, that is up to the men and women who were voted into a "Public Office", NOT a Public/Private/Partnership with United Nations foreign influence on local matters.
If you did read the package, with complete truthful evidence therein, then you are well aware of the situation the City mayor and councillors find themselves in. They are in an un-lawful, de-facto, and ultra-vires situation, (operating under the color of law) without the lawful or legal jurisdiction to taxation et al without contracts from the people, giving consent to contract with the corporations of BC, Canada, City of Williams Lake, Cariboo Regional District, and the corporation of the United Nations amongst others. Going to the province of BC Inc is pointless since they too are "acting" as a legal government when in fact they're just another corporation in the same unlawful jurisdiction as the city is. Contract makes the law and consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. The City is claiming to have jurisdiction.
In this case the City of Williams Lake is asking for taxes et al without contract or consent to contract. I see that CAO Gary Muraca Cc (unelected and 2nd in command, if not 1st) is well aware of the situation, as are all the other unelected CAO's in the corporations of Canada Inc. et al.
The point of the matter is that the corporation known as the City of Williams Lake CAN NOT collect tax, enforce Acts, Statutes, By-laws et al without contract. Gary Muraca, the CFO, and the city lawyer know this too. So do I. This is my community, my family and others built this community and in law; "He who creates owns." There's enough fraud going around at every level.
Adhesion Contracts are not contracts, tacit contracts made without disclosure, amongst other things are fraud, conversion, and extortion. I need not add more, although I most likely could. Government Service Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of British Columbia et al can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers, and dependants. Their rules do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as "Public Policy." All Acts, Bills, and Statutes created by any level of government corporations only apply to "person."
Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition, page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnership, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of the another. Thus, it does not apply to men and women, to whom this trespass is occurring. Maybe you'd best take this up with a lawyer, they're well aware we're operating under Maritime Law, the law of commerce, which requires contracts. (Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus)
As I told the Mayor, it's his neighbors and friends who voted for what we comprehended was a public, de-jure, and lawful office, to serve the local men and women. Is CAO Muraca's signature on all the documents that our local men and women in office are responsible for with theirs? Their Oath of Office, if I recall correctly, states; "I will be accountable for the decisions that I make, and the actions that I take, in the course of my duties." They swear this Oath to the Corporation of British Columbia and Canada as noted on the top left side, an NGO. (non-governmental office) Where is the CAO Oath of Office? Yet he seems to wield great power in Williams Lake as they do elsewhere. Interesting.
Needless to say, fraud, extortion, and numerous other crimes are being committed against the good men and women of my area. The future will tell how the people will respond when they know of these crimes, especially the one in which the United Nations, through their WHO/ World Health Organization committed great harms, death, and the sterilization of their children. There's no anger than that of a parent so grieved. Personally, I wouldn't want to have to explain that one. And it fell upon Williams Lake with the stroke of a mayor's pen. There's no statute of limitation on fraud.
Simply Ross, I care. I care about my Village. I grew up here and I see a storm a coming. How we deal with that depends on the honesty and courage of all. If you can't give me what our mayor asked for then We the People already have our answer. De-facto, unlawful, ultra-vires, and with Foreign influence. Not looking good for the good men and women we voted in. May god have mercy upon their souls, they're going to need it.
In all sincerity, without any malice, and always with love and respect in my heart,
Darcy Martens, woman
All rights reserved.
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Angie Delainey <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: Delegation Request
To the Enclosed. Specifically, Mayor Rathor.
(Any definitions on words, and noted herein, come from Black's Law 6th Edition, pages for easy reference)
This e-mail with the enclosed responses is being sent to you because you've been Cc'd or have been given this information three times already, most recently in the documented proof sent and received on the 20th of February. I received confirmation of such in February. The fact that it was or wasn't read is not my problem, it's yours. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Ross Coupe in his e-mail to me confirmed what I discussed with the Mayor on March 11th at City Hall. "Council's jurisdiction," and "I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province." Black's Law page 366: Create, To bring into being; to cause to exist; to produce; as, to create a trust, to create a corporation.
The proof of contract law with corporations, now proven through Ross, has been presented with the Clearfield Doctrine, and in paragraphs 4-5 in my response. Contracts make the law; consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant.
Other legal terms necessary to comprehend regarding this situation are:
Pages 265-266, Color of Law, The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under "color of state law." inter alia
Page 416, De facto, or a state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate. Thus, an officer, King, or government de facto is one who is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, but by usurpation, or without lawful title, inter alia
Page 1545, Usurpation of franchise or office, The unjustly intruding upon or exercising any office, franchise, or liberty belonging to another.
( He who creates owns, the men and women of Williams Lake built the village through their work and taxation, therefore, it is the men and women who OWN and thus, are the ones being trespassed upon, having every right to a de jure lawful office of the Mayor, Councilor, or Director)
Black's Law Dictionary 11th Edition, page 537, De jure, as a matter of law, existing by right or according to law. (LAW; Land Air Water, "water" refers to Maritime Law, the law of commerce, the law of contracts.)
Page 1522, Ultra vires, An act performed without any authority to act on subject. By doctrine of ultra vires, a contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of its corporate powers is unlawful. ( Where is the disclosure? See: paragraphs 4-5 in my response, also The10 Points of Contract Law) et al
Pages 660-663, Fraud, An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. inter alia (This began when we, and our sons and daughters were "born", through the fraud of the Bond Birth Certificate, creating the slaves we are today, and so on, and so on.)
Page 585, Extortion, The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. inter alia
Page 332, Conversion, An unauthorized assumption and exercise of right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or the exclusion of the owner's rights. inter alia (Note here, all the foreclosures of property due to taxation fraud, not good on behalf of the corporation of Williams Lake, having done so under all the definitions above.)
Page 1523, Unalienable Right, Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold or transferred. Rights which can never be abridged because they are so fundamental.
Page 572, Exercised Dominion, Open acts and conduct relative to land as evidence of claim of right of absolute possession, use, and ownership.
"All Rights Reserved" Look that up for yourself.
As I stated to the mayor on March 11th, and within the packages to all councillors, CAO Muraca, and the board of the Cariboo Regional District and their CAO; What jurisdiction are you in as a corporation that allows you legal means to taxation, by-laws etcetera, without Consent to Contract? You are all in serious trouble as are those before you operating under the color of law. The men and women in Williams Lake have the Unalienable Right to lawful governance. ( Authorized by, and accountable to, We the People) Mayor Walt Cobb was in office when the WHO/ World Health Organization overstepped their authority as a Foreign Corporation and mandated needles in the arms of the people, without consent!
It doesn't matter what CEO Brian Mulroney signed at the Rio Summit in 1992, because that fell upon the corporation and its employees, against their will too. Where in their employment contracts did they agree to give up their bodily autonomy when accepting employment? This too is coming your way and to the other officers and officials in the municipalities worldwide, who by their signatures allowed this treason? Page 1501, Treason, consists of two elements: adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort.
It was my desire to enlighten my neighbours and friends, who sought and gained office within our geographical area. Knowledge is power and he who has it, wields it with either justice or deception. Operating in ultra vires can be remedied. The conversation must be had though. Swearing Oaths without "Certainty of Meaning and Full Disclosure" (10 Points of Contract Law) affects you too, when done in deception, fraud, and others.
Suffice it to say, I know you know. Others know too, worldwide. Free will is a right we all possess. Use your wisely and with discernment.
Respectfully then and respectfully now,
Darcy Martens
All rights reserved.
1.55K
views
7
comments
12
Wally Dove no such thing as the Income Tax Act
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Wally Dove is one of Canada’s more persistent anti-government activists. Arguably, he is also one of the most successful. Back in 2004 he and Sonya Zenz (relationship unclear) were charged with tax evasion, conspiracy to evade taxes, and false partnership claims. This led to two reported decisions:
R. v. Dove, 2004 CanLII 31861 (Ont. S.C.): http://canlii.ca/t/1hxgc
R. v. Dove, 2004 CanLII 45964 (Ont. S.C.): http://canlii.ca/t/1jdl6
In the first case Wally argued that the accused had not committed tax evasion because there was no such thing as the Income Tax Act. Justice O’Connor put it this way (para. 1):
… Mr. Dove seeks an order dismissing the charges “because there is no law called the Income Tax Act, Chapter 1 (5th Supp.) R.S.C. 1985, as amended”. In the alternative, he seeks an order requiring the Crown attorney “…to place before the Court, the Income Tax Act…, the very act which the charges in this matter have been laid against the Applicant, by producing a certified copy from the Clerk of the Parliaments”.
Dove tried and tried to get a certified copy of the Income Tax Act – he and others phoned government agencies, all in search of the One True Act. The Law Clerk, Parliamentary Counsel, the Clerk of Parliament, and CCH Canadian Limited. No luck. Ergo, if no official copy of the Income Tax Act exists, it can’t really be a law – and the offences are nullities!
And the judge rejected Wally’s application:
[4] I disagree with his position. The solution to his supposed dilemma is simple. However it is one he has chosen to ignore. In response to his letter to the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, Colette R. Charlebois of that office replied on July 28, 2004:
The Clerk of the Parliaments, who is the custodian of the original Acts of Canada and on whose behalf this office prepares certified copies, can only respond to a request that specifies the Act required to be certified with a full citation (i.e. chapter no. and year of statute) to the Statutes of Canada. If only a portion of an Act is to be certified, it should be identified by section number as well as by the full citation.
[5] Ms. Charlebois explains that upon payment of a nominal per page fee, the certified copy requested will be provided. She also provides other suggestions for obtaining copies of public statutes, from local bookstores or from the Canadian Government Publishing, Communication Canada. The Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel gave substantially the same answer and advice to friends and supporters of Mr. Dove in response to similar requests, which responses are contained in his application materials.
[6] Mr. Dove and his supporters have simply failed to avail themselves of the offer to deliver certified copies of the Act or portions of it upon their advising the Clerk what parts of the very voluminous statute they wish certified, i.e. chapter and section numbers, together with a prescribed nominal fee. I am confident they will receive a certified copy upon compliance with this procedure.
[7] I am satisfied the Income Tax Act is a lawfully passed and constitutionally valid statute of Canada.
[8] Mr. Dove’s application for a declaration that the Income Tax Act does not exist is dismissed.
On to judgment #2! This time Wally and Sonya each have lawyers. The accused made an application to stay the charges they faced and … they win! Freedom! So what was the key to their having defeated the C[C]RA? Simply put, delay. Wally and Sonya successfully argued that the delay in their trial had been so great that it was contrary to justice for the proceeding to continue. In total, it had taken 65 months to reach trial, with 108 appearances.
As a consequence the judgment does not directly address whether Wally and Sonya were, in fact, guilty, but it does lay out a little of what they were up to. Both Wally and Sonya were accountants had had set up a partnership that allegedly was structured to evade tax. The scheme was based around an obsolete software package that had been purchased for $8,700, but was valued at $2.85 million. The scheme was to depreciate the software and offset income: para. 4-7.
The Crown argued that Wally had engaged in “antics” and those were a substantial cause for delay (paras. 26-27):
… The crown attorney argued that the manner in which he conducted his defence, most particularly during the 30 month preliminary inquiry was obstreperous, nonsensical and largely a waste of everyone’s time. Some of the time spent at the preliminary inquiry dealt with motions by Dove respecting matters that would not have been advanced by competent counsel on his behalf. For example, he moved to have the court exclude Ms. Lynn Watson, the chief investigator, from the court. The court had ruled at the outset that she was exempt from the order excluding witnesses. He argued at some length that “…the Crown was using this court for criminal purposes…”, allegedly compelling witnesses “…to give evidence against their will.” Of course, the witnesses had been served with proper subpoenas and had little choice about giving evidence. He sought to have the charges dismissed on grounds he was not one of the persons named in the indictment. He took the position he had copyrighted his name and sold it. He also took the position that he was a member of the “Nishwinobi” Nation and that, as an aboriginal person, the court had no jurisdiction over him. He presented no evidence that he is aboriginal, nor that the Nishwinobi Nation even exists, nor why the court would not have jurisdiction to hear these criminal charges against him. He wrote lengthy letters to crown counsel, the investigator, and the preliminary inquiry judge demanding compensation for alleged wrongs, including using his copywrited name without his permission. On several occasions the court adjourned briefly, usually for no more than an hour or two, to permit Dove to consult with duty counsel. …
Both Wally and Sonya argued they were substantially harmed by these delays. For Sonya she ran up a ton of debts and had a hard time finding work: para. 54. Wally suffered even more. Before trial he and his wife had owned two houses and lived a comfortable lifestyle, but instead had run into debt to continue this lawsuit: para. 53. But that was not all (para. 52):
Dove suffered physical and emotional stress over and above that expected and associated with any accused person awaiting trial on criminal charges. The extensive delays in this matter resulted in his becoming depressed, according to his wife and his doctor. Dr. Rick Lindall performed a psychological assessment of Dove and gave evidence of his findings and treatment of him. He said, “Mr. Dove also had an elevated score on the Major Depression scale, within in (sic) the Severe Syndrome scales… Mr. Dove reported that he continues to experience psychological/emotional difficulties as a direct consequence of the lawsuit. The symptoms he experiences include: Anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, frustration, apprehensions about health, somatic problems, changes in sleep pattern, diminished libido, disturbing dreams, marital stress, fatigue, and a compromise in cognitive functioning due to stress. The psychological test findings indicate a significant level of affective distress for Mr. Dove in terms of anxiety and depression…” See Ex. 29. Dr. Warsi, another physician with whom he consulted, said, “He experienced an episode of vasovagal syncope in Dec. 2003…” See Ex. 30. …
Curiously, litigation on the Dove/Zenz con was still going on as late as last year! In February the Tax Court of Canada refused to permit a constitutional challenge of an aspect of an audit of Dolores Romanuk (Romanuk v. The Queen, 2012 TCC 58: http://canlii.ca/t/fq9wf) who had been one of the subscribers to the software depreciation scam. The gears grind slow at times here in Canada…
So, now living free and easy, would Wally make his life afresh and anew? Well, not really. First Wally hooks up with David-Kevin: Lindsay, and in R. v. Maleki, 2006 ONCJ 401 (http://canlii.ca/t/1pwgv) provides affidavit evidence on the non-existence of the Income Tax Act. Yep, basically the same argument. Still doesn’t work.
So what else do we know about Wally? Well, among other things, Dove claims to be a former auditor of the Canada Revenue Agency, at the time named the Canada Customs Revenue Agency. But he defected, as a “deeply religious man”, given the disturbing things he had witnessed. A lot of the accounts of his time with the CCRA seem to have disappeared off the net, but here are some I found: https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=9418
1.61K
views
9
comments
13
Letter to Send to CRA when they are extortion using threat of harm to demand money
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240
Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344
Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html
[email protected]
Date
Bob Hamilton, acting as the Commissioner of Revenue (SIC)
CANADA REVENUE AGENCY
PO BOX 3800 STN A
SUDBURY ON
P3A 0C3
Bob Hamilton
Account identifier - __________, CRA claim against “____________________” (put your all caps name here)
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
Take Notice that we are demanding a “validation” that is, competent evidence that establishes some contractual obligation between (YOUR ALL CAPS NAME - remove brackets)(hereinafter ___ your initials - leave brackets) the Person, or me (collectively Us) and you and/or your company, Canada Revenue Agency obligating us to Pay you or the Agency you represent.
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual or lawful obligations to Canada Revenue Agency. Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to the Laws of (name your province) and Canada and provide Us with following documents, under penalty of perjury;
1. Certified copy of the contract/the alleged Income Tax Act giving rise to alleged debt claimed by your Agency, Canada Revenue Agency.
2. Letter of commitment, signed by an officer of your Agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claim as well as your Agency's full compliance with all the laws, provincial and federal, including but not limited to the Constitution Act governing your Agency’s actions in relation to its claim.
3. An affidavit, by an officer of the Canada Revenue Agency, that the alleged debt claimed is authorized by an Act lawfully passed by the Parliament of Canada, having obtained the “Royal Assent” which is used in the process giving rise to the claim to this claim .
For further clarity, you are commanded to point to “specific legislative authority” in support of ALL actions by your Agency, Canada Revenue Agency and individuals acting and/ or representing the Canada Revenue Agency.
As an Officer of an agency, you should also be aware that making unsubstantiated demands for payment, including via email may constitute fraud under federal and/or provincial laws, including the Criminal Code. Also other applicable legislation, the Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982, before your next communication with me.
Once more, before proceeding any further, You and your Agency are commanded to provide me with:
a- the aforementioned documents/answers; and/or
b- a letter of advise that your agency has NO claim against _________________ (all caps name) within 15 days from the date of this letter considering that the time is of the essence.
Failing to provide the above demanded proof(s) of your claim shall constitute you and the Agency you represent have no claim(s) against me. You must provide me with a letter in writing stating your claim, no longer than 21 days from the date of this communication, which shall bind you and your Agency as well. Otherwise, this shall constitute your tacit consent that you are acting of your own accord having assumed personal liabilities for any, and all possible damages of any kind. The implication of your actions may cause Us damage, the amount of which is at our sole discretion.
Such financial damages, compensation and expenses are due on demand and any delay in full payment shall be subject to penalties and interest solely at our discretion which can change from time to time without ANY Notice and shall be limited only by relevant sections of duly enacted Acts of Parliament of (name province) and/or Canada.
Govern yourself accordingly.
Autograph
___________________
( all caps name)
: first name : last name (write your name in lowercase)
de jure Attorney/ Creditor
C/O Address Lot ___ Block ___
PO Box ___
Village/Town/City
[postal code] note: leave square brackets on postal code
8
comments
LATEST SCRIPT MOVES US EVEN CLOSER TO THE GREAT DECEPTION include Pierre Poilievre to this Club!
Loading 2 comments...
-
22:02
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
17 hours agoDining out is Dying out
2023 -
LIVE
Nerdrotic
4 hours ago $18.19 earnedKathleen Kennedy OUT | Starfleet Academy ISNT Star Trek - Friday Night Tights 389 w YellowFlash
2,852 watching -
1:13:11
vivafrei
4 hours agoCanada's Deal with the Devil! FBI Wrongdoer Promoted Again? AND MORE! Special Guest Kyle Seraphin
66.4K47 -
1:04:58
Russell Brand
4 hours agoThe Money Is Breaking — And So Is the System | Max Keiser — SF670
113K38 -
1:07:38
MattMorseTV
5 hours ago $34.83 earned🔴Trump just CALLED their BLUFF.🔴
69.5K235 -
LIVE
Dr Disrespect
8 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - ARC RAIDERS - SLICE AND DICE
973 watching -
The Nunn Report - w/ Dan Nunn
4 hours ago[Ep 827] Protests, Riots, or Terror? | All-Star Guest Line-Up!!
24K4 -
1:10:22
The Tom Renz Show
3 hours agoJustice For J6? Not Without someone Growing a Spine!
32K7 -
1:46:52
The Quartering
6 hours agoLEFTISTS HAVE LOST THE NARRATIVE ON ICE RAIDS & THEY ARE DESPERATE!
231K120 -
DVR
StoneMountain64
6 hours agoArc Raiders Osprey Sniping and PVP Friday
32.6K1