The Inescapability of Group Dynamic and Form - Blood $atellite

After discussing Chud Kant in a Gooner’s Aristocracy and Wrath of Gnon’s analysis of “The Human Scale” as an ideal measure of scale in human communities, Dimes and Judas build into the fascinating book “Experiences in Groups” by Wilfred Bion. There they explore the psychoanalytic approach of identifying group behaviors as a holistic organism, how everyone lives within the context of groups that form inevitably, and the difference between a basic assumption group and a work group.

Taken from Episode #240 – Chuck Formerly Starts Blinking Linkin Park [“huffing flux vapor”]

Listen to full episodes of Blood $atellite on, iTunes, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Audible, and more.
➡️ Full Content: http://www.bloodsatellite.ca
➡️ Clips: https://odysee.com/@BloodSatellite:3
➡️ Support: https://bloodsatellite.gumroad.com/

★ Store: https://goodsvffer.com/
★ Vanguardist Journal: https://vanguardistjournal.com/
★ Twitter: https://twitter.com/LegallyIronic

Timestamps:

0:00 – Chud Kant and Aristocratic Goonering

08:33 – Generational Categorization as a Media for Fragmenting Identity in Utility Time

17:51 – Utilizing “The Human Scale” for Group Organization

28:12 – “Experiences in Groups” Discussion Begins

32:13 – The Inescapable Negotiation Between Individual and Group

35:23 – Basic Assumption Groups vs. Work Groups

38:36 – The Functional Definition of a Group

43:32 – The Group as a Pool of Desires as Complicity

47:19 – The Proto-Mental Matrix

50:12 – Leaders in Dependent Groups and the Genius/Madman Oscillation

54:58 – The Long-Term Superiority of the Work Group vs. Basic Assumptions