Live Eschatology Discussion with Undevelopment Team - Matthew 24 Parousia Second Coming real meaning

Link to Undevelopement Team channel: https://www.youtube.com/@undevelopmentteam

No guest on my channel reflects my views. I just merely have a variety of people on my shows.

I'm trying to be open minded and just figure out what the best way of viewing these passages are. I am someone who thinks most of "Christianity" has not really allowed open debate and dialogue, and I think much of "christianity" is in a deception and delusion. I do not think if as many were truly biblically sound as they think they are, that the entire world would have got locked down. And many still cheer for the man, Donald Trump, which gave them the lockdown and vaccine.

So, seeing how delusional they are about Trump, why believe these people are not just as delusional when it comes to the Bible?

And yes, bible eschatology does tie into politics, because what people believe determines their attitude and what deceptions they will fall for.

-------------------------

The first 2 hours is basically my Guest going over the Greek word Parousia, which is the word many use to argue for Jesus's second coming. And he goes over various ways that word is translated and what looks to be inconsistent translations of the word.

I was unaware of his Eschatological view. While there is some things I disagree with, I do find his research into the word PAROUSIA interesting.

The last two hours is just a discussion about various things, his view on Revelation 11, the resurrection, Daniel 9.

And i definitely don't believe in the 33 AD crucifixion of Jesus that he does, I believe it had to be 31 AD, and I really haven't seen any evidence that is strong to say otherwise. I think the next time I do a show, I will probably try to get someone like Scott Clem or a panel of people sharing a view closer to his. I would like to have a discussion with people who hold to a 31ad crucifixion on Wednesday, who do not interpret "a day for a year" in any passage that does not call for it. I'm interested in having someone with a contextual historicist view that does not do the "day for a year" in Revelation's "1260 days" and does not do it in other passages that do not call for it either.